PROSPECTS FOR CLOSER YUGOSLAV ECONOMIC RELATIONS WITH THE USSR

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79T01003A001500060003-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
16
Document Creation Date: 
November 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 17, 2000
Sequence Number: 
3
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 10, 1963
Content Type: 
BRIEF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79T01003A001500060003-6.pdf569.11 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP79TO1003AO01500060003-6 CONFIDENTIAL -4U Current Support Brief PROSPECTS FOR CLOSER YUGOSLAV ECONOMIC RELATIONS WITH THE USSR CIA/RR CB 63-6 10 January 1963 CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Office of Research and Reports CONFIDENTIAL GROUP i Excluded from automatic Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP79T01003 00d'$'$ 0 -6 Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP79TO1003AO01500060003-6 This material contains information affecting the National Defense of the United States within the meaning of the espionage laws, Title 18, USC, Sees. 793 and 794, the trans- mission or revelation of which in any manner to an unauthorized person is prohibited by law. Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP79TO1003AO01500060003-6 Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP79TO1003AO01500060003-6 C -O-N-F-I-D-E -N-T-I-A-L CONTENTS Page Summary and Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1. Recent Developments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 a. Trade and Aid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 b. Economic Systems and Ideologies . . . . . . . . 4 2. Prospects . a. Motivating Factors . . ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? . . b. Limiting Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3. Influence of Western Aid on Yugoslav Policy Table s 1. Yugoslav Foreign Trade with the USSR, 1958-62 . . . 10 2. Yugoslav Foreign Trade with the European Satellites, 11 1958-62 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C -O-N-F-I-D-E -N-T -I-A-L Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP79TO1003AO01500060003-6 Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP79TO1003AO01500060003-6 C -O-N-F -I-D-E -N-T -I-A-L PROSPECTS FOR CLOSER YUGOSLAV ECONOMIC RELATIONS WITH THE USSR Summary and Conclusions The recent rapprochement between Yugoslavia and the USSR has entailed Soviet recognition of the respectability of the Yugoslav brand of socialism and agreements calling for a substantial increase in Soviet-Yugoslav trade. Both sides appear to be playing down ideological differences. At the same time, neither the USSR nor the Yugoslavs have taken any important steps to reduce the actual differences in their economic systems. The new Yugoslav trade agreement with the USSR, if implemented, would bring trade well above the depressed level of the past 2 years, but there are no firm indications that the USSR has extended new credits to Yugoslavia, and Yugoslavia has not as yet gained association with the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance (CEMA). The Yugoslav regime undoubtedly favors increased economic relations with the USSR to derive economic benefits and to protect the country against the uncertain prospects for Western trade and aid. The regime, however, would be reluctant to increase these relations to the point of threatening Yugoslav independence; the uniqueness of the Yugoslav economic system, the benefits of good economic relations with the West, including credits and a better quality and greater diversity of imports; and the special advantages of a "nonaligned" status in relations with underdeveloped Free World coun- tries. Moreover, the decentralized economic system of Yugoslavia makes it difficult for the government to increase greatly imports from the Soviet Bloc even if it so wishes, because of the preference of Yugoslav producers and consumers for Western manufactured goods. Tito no doubt hopes that closer Soviet-Yugoslav relations can be achieved without endangering the US aid program under Public Law 480 and Western European credits. If his actions should provoke suspension of US aid and Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP79TO1003AO01500060003-6 Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP79T01003A001500060003-6 C -O-N-F -I-D-E -N-T -I-A-L supporting measures in Western Europe, he faces a serious short-term problem of maintaining food consumption at a satisfactory level, for the Bloc is in a weak position to help him in tis be expectedngor term, loss or curtailment of Western ass lower significantly the rate of Yugoslav economic growth unless com- pensating credits are obtained from Bloc countries. C -O-N -F -I-D -E -N -T -I-A-L Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP79T01003A001500060003-6 Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP79TO1003AO01500060003-6 C-O-N-F-I-D-E-N-T-I-A-L 1. Recent Developments a. Trade and Aid Recent indications of improvements in Yugoslav relations with the USSR -- such as the exchange of visits by Presidents Brezhnev and Tito and subsequent statements by Khrushchev and Tito suggesting a broadened area of agreement -- raise the possibility of a closer economic relation- ship between the two countries. Such a change presumably would involve a substantial increase in trade between the two countries -- possibly with the stimulus of Soviet credits and technical assistance for Yugoslav indus- trial development. The USSR might also offer Yugoslavia some form of participation in CEMA. Yugoslav trade with the USSR has recently declined to only 5 or 6 percent of its total turnover compared with a share of 9 percent in 1959, and trade with the European Satellites has declined moderately, to about 16 percent of Yugoslav turnover (see Tables 1 and 2). Expecta- tions of increased Yugoslav trade with the USSR and the Satellites rest largely on new trade agreements for the next several years. A new agreement with the USSR, covering 1963-65, projects a trade turnover of $750 million during the 3 years compared with the old agreement for 1961-65 that scheduled a turnover of $800 million during the 5 years and was not being fulfilled. The Soviet-Yugoslav trade protocol for 1963 schedules a turnover of about $180 million -- an amount about three- fifths larger than turnover in 1960 (a more normal year than 1961) and much larger than turnover in 1962, judging from data for 9 months. Whether or not any such growth of trade with the USSR will actually take place remains to be seen, for earlier agreements specifying large in- creases in Soviet-Yugoslav trade sometimes were not realized. Yugo- slav complaints that the USSR would not deliver the desired types and qualities of goods have been common. Even if both governments agree that a much larger volume of exchanges is desirable, the carrying out of the policy may be hampered by the freedom that Yugoslav producing and trading enterprises have in deciding what to produce and where to market it most profitably. C-O-N-F-I-D-E -N- T-I-A-L Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP79TO1003AO01500060003-6 Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP79T01003A001500060003-6 C-O-N-F-I-D-E-N-T-I-A-L There is little firm evidence so far that the USSR has extended or soon plans to extend credits to Yugoslavia. Since the suspension-in 1958 o of of Soviet and other Bloc credits extended during the preceding t e riod rapprochement, Yugoslavia has received no new tries except possibly for one credit from Poland. The efforts last July of a Yugoslav economic delegation in Moscow to arrange reinstitution of the suspended Soviet credit do not appear so far to have been successful. The Yugoslav regime has been interested for some time in gain- ing observer status in CEMA, apparently believing that such an associa- tion would further the country's development and would be accepted by Western countries without a violent reaction if it were accompanied by efforts to obtain some form of association with the European Common Market. So far as can be determined, however, Yugoslav participation in CEMA has not yet been approved. b. Economic Systems and Ideologies The recent Soviet-Yugoslav rapprochement has involved Soviet ciali recognition of the respectability of the Yugoslav by bransided desf so The Sovietand the playing down of ideological differences regime once again has formally recognized Yugoslavia's status as a socialist state in spite of the differences in approach and in economic systems. The USSR has strengthened Yugoslavia's ideological position and. Finally in agricultural policy by accepting a similar deviation in discussion in the olUSSR and the by greatly widening the area of acceptable m European Satellites on possible ways of reforming the eco omch c ysted (for example, the discussion of the "Liberman proposal, USSR has give greater freedom of action to enterprise managers), the made the unique aspects of Yugoslav socialism outside agriculture more s ze For its part respectable within the Bloc. ideological differences with heaBpoc but to be willing to deem,p without retreating from its established ideological line. The main ideological differences between the USSR and Yugo- slavia, however, still exist. Moreover, recent institutional changes in the two countries have done little to make the two systems more C-O-N-F-I-D-E-N-T-I-A-L Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP79T01003A001500060003-6 Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP79T01003A001500060003-6 C -O-N-F-I-D-E -N- T-I-A-L similar, and a sharp contrast remains between Yugoslav decentralization and workers' management and the strong central control and detailed planning of the Soviet system. In the USSR, recent changes have been wholly administrative in character and, if anything, have tightened central controls over the economy. The Liberman proposal and other liberal proposals, if adopted, would indeed bring the Soviet system closer to the Yugoslav, although none of the proposals would go so far as to allow the market to regulate an important part of economic activity as in Yugoslavia. These proposals, however, have not been implemented, and the prospects for any drastic changes in the Soviet economic system in the near future are small. The Yugoslav system, which had been further liberalized in 1961 with the adoption of a uniform foreign exchange rate and a reduction of controls over the expenditures of enterprises, appears to have weathered a period of faltering industrial growth and stagnation of exports in 1961 and the first half of 1962 without any major damage, and the economic situation, except in agriculture, has improved considerably, in the past few months. Some restrictions over enterprise activities and foreign exchange spending were reimposed, but the regime apparently relied mainly on indirect methods of control such as a tightening of bank credit, resisting the temptation to attack current economic problems through direct intervention by the state. In agriculture, however, economic pressure on private farmers to enter into some form of association with cooperatives increased considerably, although there was only a small increase in the area under socialized farming. 2. Prospects a. Motivating Factors The Yugoslav regime has both ideological and economic reasons for seeking closer relations with the Bloc. Communist ideology fosters a desire on the part of the Yugoslav leaders to have the "socialist" status of their country accepted by other Communist countries. It is probable that profitable opportunities exist for increased trade and other forms of economic cooperation with the Bloc that have been slighted in C-O-N-F-I-D-E -N-T-I-A-L Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP79T01003A001500060003-6 Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP79T01003A001500060003-6 C-O-N-F-I-D-E-N-T-I-A-L the past for political reasons. Finally, increased economic relations with the Bloc are also sought because of the uncertainties of Western policies concerning trade and aid. Prospects for aid from the US must seem uncertain to the Tito regime. Whether or not the loss of most- favored-nation status for Yugoslav exports to the US can be reversed in the near future is also uncertain. Boycotts and demonstrations in some US communities against goods from Communist countries have caused concern in Yugoslavia. The Common Market seems certain to have adverse effects eventually on Yugoslav trade with Western Europe e amp merxibrship can unless some special status Germany, associate eseems present arranged -- a step that to oppose. b. Limiting Factors Although the Yugoslav regime wants to expand its economic rela- tions and improve its ideological relations with the Bloc, it is apparently as determined as ever to maintain Yugoslavia's full independence and the distinctive economic system evolved over the last decade. Moreover, the regime would be reluctant to forego the economic benefits which have re- sulted from "nonaligned" status and from extensive trade with the West -- US and other Western aid, a wider variety and better quality of imported for trade with the Bloc, and the ability goods, a good bargaining position to sell "socialism" and expand trade in underdeveloped countries without the onus attached to membership in a "bloc. " It seems unlikely that Tito is willing to make any substantial changes in the Yugoslav economic system to accommodate the Russians, and he is deeply committed to an independent Yugoslav approach to Communism. Neither is it likely, however, that a Yugoslav retreat in these areas would be made a condition of closer relations with the USSR. Acceptance of the avoid- respectability of the Yugoslav both sides seem to constitute an adequate ance of ideological attacks by basis for closer economic relations. Yugoslavia probably could above increase relatively lowylethe share f vel of reoeuthe Soviet Bloc in its foreign trade years without risking its independence but not without some economic cost. If the increase in trade with the Bloc occurred at the expense of C-O-N-F-I-D-E-N-T-I-A-L Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP79T01003A001500060003-6 Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP79TO1003AO01500060003-6 C-O-N-F-I-D-E-N-T-I-A-L trade with the West, Yugoslavia would suffer a loss in the quality and diversity of its imports. The rapid expansion of trade with the West, as well as Western credits, has been an important stimulus to Yugoslav economic growth, which averaged 10 percent annually during 1957-61. Moreover, a large expansion of trade with the Bloc would be dif- ficult to achieve -- even if the regime wished it -- with present institu- tions, which permit Yugoslav enterprises to choose their markets. The preferences of Yugoslav buyers usually are for Western goods, at least with respect to manufactured goods. Bloc countries can promote trade with Yugoslavia by making more attractive goods available, but in many instances they are not in a good position to compete. Bloc exports of raw materials, however, generally do not suffer from a disadvantage. The Yugoslav regime can arrange for the equipment for centrally planned investment projects to come from the Bloc, even though Western equip- ment might be more profitable. Such an arrangement was made to ex- pand the Zenica steel mill. The regime could also discriminate in favor of the Bloc by means of tariffs, quotas, or multiple exchange rates, but by so doing it would be retreating from the reforms of early 1961 and thus impairing its chances of receiving favorable treatment in the West. In seeking a rapprochement with the Soviet Bloc,..:the':Yugbslav. regime probably will try to retain the influence its nonaligned status gives it among the underdeveloped countries of the Free World. So long as Yugoslavia is not regarded as an instrument of Soviet power, its influence, bolstered by a program of trade and aid for these underde- veloped countries, seems unlikely to be much affected by a rapprochement with the USSR. 3. Influence of Western Aid on Yugoslav Policy The effects of possible expansion of Yugoslav economic relations with the USSR depend not only on the nature and extent of the measures taken but also on the reaction of Western countries, especially the reaction of those that have been sources of grants and credits. Tito no doubt realizes that at some point his foreign policy -- which increasingly seems like nonalignment against the West -- may lead Jthe US to discontinue its aid C-O-N-F-I-D-E-N-T-I-A-L Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP79TO1003AO01500060003-6 Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP79TO1003AO01500060003-6 C-O-N-F-I-D-E -N- T-I-A-L program and to urge supporting action by Western European countries. An important volume of aid is at stake, including not only US deliveries of surplus wheat under Public Law 480 (valued at about $90 million for the 1962/63 crop year), but sizable credits from Western Europe, in- cluding a $78 million credit obtained. from Italy last summer, another $78 million credit obtained from a British consortium last November for construction of a steel works in Macedonia, and a $30 million French commodity credit covering 1963-65. Yugoslavia's trade deficit with the US -- a rough measure of total US aid -- rose from. $50 million in 1960 (when US aid reached its low point) to $145 million in 1961. The deficit during the first 9 months of 1962 was $130 million. Suspension of US aid at this time probably would soon have a serious effect on the level of Yugoslav food consumption. What the continuing effect might be is difficult to foresee, as it would depend on future har- vests and Yugoslav success in importing grain from other sources. It is clear, however, that Bloc countries are in a poor position to replace Yugoslav imports of wheat from the US. US deliveries of grain to Yugo- slavia under Public Law 480 -- the mot important element of US aid -- declined substantially several years ago but have again become large. The grain deliveries scheduled for 1962/63 make up an estimated one- fourth of the average daily Yugoslav food consumption of about 2, 900 calories per capita. The Yugoslav regime has wanted to dispense with these deliveries for some time and did succeed in reducing them to a low level in 1960 after the excellent harvest of 1959. Reduced grain harvests since 1959, however, have again impelled the regime to re- quest large deliveries, as shown in the following tabulation: C-O-N-F-I-D-E-N-T-I-A-L Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP79TO1003AO01500060003-6 Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP79TO1003AO01500060003-6 C-O-N-F-I-D-E-N-T-I-A-L Yugoslav production (thousand metric tons) Wheat, rye, and corn Wheat and rye only US deliveries of wheat under Public Law 480 (thousand metric tons) US deliveries of wheat as a percent of Yugo- slav production Wheat, rye, and corn Wheat and rye only 1958/59 1959/6o 1960 61 6,641 11,065 9,963 2,691 4,395 3,803 838 241 148 13 2 1 31 5 4 1961/62 1962/63* 7,910 8,000 3,360 3,200 942 1,400 12 18 28 44 Unless grain production in 1963 recovers to something like the 1959 level, cancellation of US deliveries could cause an extremely difficult temporary situation for Tito. The weather so far during the 196Z/63 crop year has not been particularly favorable, but much depends on crop conditions next spring and summer. Western grants and credits to Yugoslavia have increasingly become a factor supporting an unusually high rate of investment and economic growth rather than emergency assistance facilitating the estrangement of Yugo- slavia from the Soviet Bloc. The main long-term effect of loss or reduc- tion of US assistance probably would be a significant lowering of the rate of growth unless substantial credits were obtained from Bloc countries. * Preliminary figures for production and scheduled amount of US deliveries. C-O-N-F-I-D-E -N-T-I-A-L Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP79TO1003AO01500060003-6 Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP79TO1003AO01500060003-6 C-O-N-F-I-D-E-N-T-I-A-L Table 1 Yugoslav Foreign Trade with the USSR 1958-62 Jan-Sep 1958 1959 1960 1961 . 1962 Value of trade (million US $) Turnover with the USSR J 94 105 log 83 59 Imports from the USSR 58 58 57 32 38 Exports to the USSR 36 47 53 51 22 Deficit with the USSR J -21 -10 -4 -16 Share of Yugoslav totals (percent) Turnover with the USSR 8.4 g.0 7.9 5.6 5.2 Imports from the USSR 8.4 8.4 6.9 3.5 5.6 Exports to the USSR 8.2 9.9 9.3 8.9 4.6 Deficit with the USSR 8.8 4.9 1.6 b 7.8 a. Because of rounding, components may not add to the totals shown. b. Yugoslavia had a trade surplus of $19 million with the USSR but an over-all trade deficit of $341 million. Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP79TO1003AO01500060003-6 Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP79TO1003AO01500060003-6 C-O-N-F-I-D-E-N-T-I-A-L Table 2 Yugoslav Foreign Trade with the European Satellites 1958-62 Jan-Sep 1958 1959 9 1960 1961 1962 Value of trade (million US $) Turnover with the European Satellites a/ 221 212 283 262 183 Imports from the European Satellites 135 112 154 137 93 Exports to the European Satel- lites 86 99 129 125 90 Deficit with the European Satel- lites -49 -12 -25 -12 -3 Share of Yugoslav totals (percent) Turnover with the European Satel- lites 19.6 18.2 20.3 17.7 15.9 Imports from the European Satel- lites 19.7 16.E 18.7 15.1 13.7 Exports to the European Satel- lites 19.5 20.9 22.8 21.9 19.0 Deficit with the European Satel- lites 2.0 5.9 9.6 3.7 1.5 a. Because of rounding, components may not-add to the totals'shown. Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP79TO1003AO01500060003-6 Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP79T01003A001500060003-6 Analyst: Coord: C-O-N-F-I-D-E-N-T-I-A-L 25X1A C-O-N-F-I-D-E -N-T-I-A-L Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP79T01003A001500060003-6 Approved For Release 1?O1ARDP79TO1 003A001 500060003-6 CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 2000/06/07 : CIA-RDP79T01003A001500060003-6