OUTLOOK FOR AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION IN THE SINO-SOVIET BLOC 1955

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
36
Document Creation Date: 
November 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 25, 1998
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 15, 1955
Content Type: 
IM
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1.pdf1.83 MB
Body: 
Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS INTELLIGENCE MEMORANDUM OUTLOOK FOR AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION IN THE SINO-SOVIET BLOC 1955 CIA/RR IM-412 15 July 1955 WARNING THIS MATERIAL CONTAINS INFORMATION AFFECTING THE NATIONAL DEFENSE OF THE UNITED STATES WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE ESPIONAGE LAWS, TITLE 18, USC, SECS. 793 AND 791+, THE TRANSMISSION OR REVELATION OF WHICH IN ANY MANNER TO AN UNAUTHORIZED PERSON IS PROHIBITED BY LAW. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Office of Research and Reports NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 FOREWORD This memorandum is a preliminary analysis of the condition of growing crops in the Sino-Soviet Bloc. It is based on information available as of 15 June 1955. As a qualitative statement, it reflects the prospects for the food supply of the Bloc for the consumption year from 1 July 1955 through 30 June 1956. It should be noted that Sino-Soviet Bloc crops are in the making and that the final outcome will depend on developments during June and July. Should. weather conditions fluctuate, the food situation in the Bloc would become worse or improve correspondingly. After the weather conditions during June and July are known, a further statement on crop conditions will be issued -- probably in September -- and will be followed later by estimates of quantitative production based on acreage as well as yield. The memorandum also indicates the general effect that, pressures exerted by current governmental programs and policies may have on agriculture developments in the Sino-Soviet Bloc. The USSR and China sections of this memorandum have been coordinated with the Department of Agriculture. Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 CONTENTS Page Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I. USSR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 A. General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 B. Weather and Crop Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 C. Outlook for Agricultural Production . . . . . . . . . . . 6 1. General . . . . . . . . . . . . ? 6 2. "New Lands" Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3. Corn Program . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . 11 4. Livestock Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 II. European Satellites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 A. General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 B. Weather and Crop Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 1. Albania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 2. Bulgaria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 3. Czechoslovakia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 4. East Germany . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 5. Hungary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 6. Poland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 7. Rumania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 C. Outlook for Agricultural Production . . . . . . . . . . . 23 III. Communist China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Appendix Source References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 CIA/RR IM-412 (ORR Project 21.744) OUTLOOK FOR AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION IN THE SINO-SOVIET BLOC* 1955 Summary Crop prospects in the Sino-Soviet Bloc indicate that agricultural production in the Bloc will not rise substantially above the mediocre 1951+ levels. Although the agricultural outlook in the USSR is somewhat more favorable than it was in June of 1954, the European Satellites face another year of below-normal food availability, and Communist China's agricultural production will be no better than it was in 1954, a year of near starvation in many areas. In the USSR the failure of the "new course" to raise agricultural production led Soviet officials to launch two rather hazardous pro- grams -- the expansion of grain acreages on "new lands" in which both soil and climate conditions are marginal and the expansion of corn acreages in the Ukraine and in other areas of the USSR not well suited to the production of corn. The first program involves an increase in 1955 of about 16 million hectares, seeded largely to spring wheat and millet. It is probable that this new acreage will increase the 1955 gross production of grain above the prewar average, but on a per capita basis grain availability will remain below that of the prewar base year 1938-39. The second program, raises the corn acreage in 1955 to almost 17 million hectares, a nearly fourfold expansion over the 1954 corn acreage. Production from the additional acreage will increase supplies of grain and fodder somewhat, but unless weather conditions are unusu- ally favorable during June, July, and August, the effect of this increase on the average per capita availability of meat, milk, and other livestock products during 1955-56 will not be large. * The estimates and conclusions contained in this memorandum repre- sent the best judgment of ORR as of 15 June 1955. Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79 00935A000300190001-1 The European Satellites are facing the prosp4ct of another below- normal harvest for 1955, with no hope of improving food availabilities over the poor 195+-55 food consumption year. Ad erse weather conditions affecting crop growth are primarily responsible or the unfavorable outlook for agricultural production. The factors ne,~essary to he:Lp alleviate the weather -- improved agrotechnics, mechanization, the peasant's ince:ative to raise agricultural pr materialized under the new course." The presen uing to socialize agriculture will continue to d it has in the past. In Communist C:aina, drought conditions repor of the country threaten the harvest of early ric and winter wheat ccops in the north. Unless the fall harvests in 1955, the planned 6-percent inc of food crops over the low levels of 195+ may no because the Chinese Communists have failed t of food production during the first 2 years of t Plan (1953-57), thay have found it necessary to goals downward. An additional plan failure in 1 result in harsher rural policies. These policie in order for the regime to fulfill its indus.tria quirements for agricultural products through inc from the countryside. I. USSR. ffects of adverse fertilization, and duction -- have not policy of contin- press production as ed throughout most crops in the south e are above-normal ease in the production be attained. meet planned goals e current Five Year evise their 1957 55 probably will would be necessary and export re- eased procurements A. General. Unless seriously unfavorable drought or other conditions develop before the harvest is completed, the USSR will garner somewhat more grain in 1955 than in 1954. The prospects as of 1.5 J e indicate that small- grain yields will average higher than those of 1,5)+. There are also Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP791j00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 indications of an increase of some 16 million hectares, 17* largely spring wheat and millet, on new lands. There has been, furthermore, an increase of at least 12.5 million hectares of corn, 2J chiefly to produce silage. The corn crop got a late start, and conditions for early growth in the Ukraine and the North Caucasus areas were not favorable. It is therefore improbable that the contributions made by corn as grain will add materially to the advances made by small grains. Although the quantity of grain produced in the USSR in 1955 may exceed the prewar production of 1938, it is improbable that per capita availability of grain will reach the prewar level. There has been a small increase in sugar beet acreage, and production of sugar in 1955 may exceed the low 1954 level, but the increase will not be sufficient to affect per capita availability materially. Cotton has run into difficulties this year. Cold weather killed sprouting plants and necessitated considerable replanting in certain important areas. Danger from insect pests is also reported. The 1955 cotton production may be expected to be about the same as that of 195+ Soviet officials are stressing the need for increase of livestock numbers and productivity. The corn expansion program is directed toward this end. The program initiated this year, if successful, cannot be expected to increase to any material degree the availabilities of meat, milk, and other livestock products during the 1955-56 consumption year. B. Weather and Crop Conditions. On the basis of information available as of 1 June 1955, Soviet crop prospects'for the current year are judged to be relatively favorable. As yet there are no indications of droughts such as plagued the Ukraine and the Volga area in the summer of 195I.. The new lands area of West Siberia and Kazakhstan had favorable fall and winter precipitation, but the spring rainfall has been somewhat less than that of 195-. * For serially numbered source references, see the Appendix. Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00~35A000300190001-1 In the fall of 1954, most of the USSR had "relatively favorable weather for the sowing and growth of fall-sown grains for harvest in 1955. There were, aowever, some areas in the southern Ukraine and North Caucasus where rainfall was light -- a cont nuation of the 1954 summer drought. Temperatures were above normal ii most areas, the first frosts coming much later than they did in t~e fall of 1953. The plan for seeding fall-sown grains was reported to have been overful- filled by October 1.0. 3/ A slight increase in thI p total acreage of fall-sown grains WE.S also reported. J a The precipitation for the winter months was normal or above normal for almost all areas of the USSR, some of the ma4or grain areas receiv- ing especially favorable amounts. There have been several recent Soviet press articles referring to the favorable fall aid winter precipitation in portions of the new lands area of West Siberi' and Kazakhstan. The only winter kill report to date has come from an observer in Moscow who indicates that "severe winter kill of fall-sawn grains was noted along the route traveled in the western oblasts of the central black- soil region. Many fields were being partly or entirely replanted to spring grains." March precipitation was generally somewhat below normal in the southern half of the European USSR and in some areas of the region of grain expansion in West Siberia and northern Kazakhstan. In April the rainfall in most areas was greater than it :aad teen during the previous month. Most of the important agricultural areaq I of the European USSR received near-normal or above-normal precipitation. In the new lands area of West Sibe:^ia and Kazakhstan, wide variations in precipitation continued through April, and many stations in Kazakhstan reported below- normal rainfall. It should be noted, however, ghat even normal precip- itation in this area'in March and April is scanty. Rainfall and tem- perature in May, June, and July are far more crcial in determining crop yield potential. j Rainfall data for May are incomplete, b~t preliminary estimates indicate relatively light precipitation in some; regions of the Ukraine, the North Caucasus, and the new lands area of West Siberia and northern Kazakhstan. In.e:arly May there were press reports from two regions of the new lands area urging that. spring sowing be done promptly because warm steppe winds were rapidly drying the soil YI/ -4 - Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP'9T00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 Field work in the Transcaucasus this spring began almost a month earlier than in the spring of 1954. / In much of the USSR, however, spring field work was delayed by cold weather. In the cotton-growing regions of Central Asia the cold weather necessitated some replanting of cotton, and in the central and northern regions of the European USSR there were complaints about delays in sprang seeding. In May, however, considerable progress in the sowing program apparently was made. In a speech at the All-Union Conference of Industrial Workers on 18 May, Khrushchev stated: "Despite the fact that spring is late this year, spring sowing is progressing consid- erably better than last year. By May 15 the collective and state farms had sown 16.3 million more hectares to grain than by the same date in 1954." 91 Later in the same speech, Khrushchev commented on the moisture situation: "Climatic conditions in most districts this year are good, and there is sufficient moisture everywhere. Should no unforeseen circumstances arise -- however, nature often acts unexpectedly -- there is every reason to expect a good harvest this year." 10 In mid-June, Khrushchev reported that the total. sown area on collective and state farms had increased 21 million. hectares over 1954. ll During the first half of May, observers in Moscow made a trip through part of the Ukraine and reported crop conditions "mostly good to excellent," soil moisture being marginal or slightly submar- ginal in the southern Ukraine but not yet causing serious crop damage. Preliminary indications are that the southern Ukraine received light to moderate rainfall during the latter part of May. Preliminary estimates indicate light rainfall in May for the North Caucasus area, but any shortage probably was offset by above-normal rainfall in the previous month of April. In the new lands area of Siberia and Kazakhstan, spring rainfall appears to have been generally below that of last spring, and there are indications that in May the rainfall was relatively light in many of the areas of expansion of spring wheat and millet. Considering the USSR as a whole,the June and July weather has assumed greater importance this year than in previous years because the wheat crop in the new lands area passes through its critical stages of development at a later date than does that of the traditional wheat areas of the USSR, and because corn, the 1955 acreage of which has been increased by more than three times the acreage of 1954, requires substantial rainfall and warm weather if it is to develop satisfactorily. Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00P35A000300190001-1 C. Outlook for Agricultural Production. 1. General. During -;he past 25 years the USSR hasIbeen unable to increase its agricultural production to keep pace with its expanding population. The present consump-:,ion level, in terms of averag4 per capita food avail- ability, is below t;aat of the later years of the krecollectivization period. J Within the last year and a half, Sovi on the successful development of two projects: ( largely spring wheat and millet -- on 28 million (70 million to 75 million acres) of new crop land River and through southern Siberia and northern is highly precarious, and (b) the expansion of t1'e areas not well suited to growing corn and pa:rtic the production of corn as grain. Other crops mu growing in the lat-.er area, both for silage and supply: t leaders have gambled ) the seeding of crops -- o 30 million hectares eastward from. the Volga zakhstan, where farming acreage of corn into larly not suited to h better adapted for rain, are ava'lable. The USSR is faced with four major problems related to food a. Population is increasing at he rate of about 3 million a year, and it will require ever-increasLng amounts of extra food to feed the lopulace, even at the present low levels of consump- tion. I b, The people in the city and country alike - - particularly the rapidly growing numbers of ind strial workers -- need more meat, m:,lk, and butter to maintain of iciency. c. Food supplies withdrawn fro. stocks during both 1-953-54 and 195+-55, when the USSR was forced b poor crop yields to dip into reserves to meet home needs, must be rplaced. d. The USSR may require large tonnages of grain for export to exchange for other types of goods. I. the past, Tsarist Russia exported as much as 10 million tons of grain a year. -6- Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP 9T00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 At first glance the tremendous land area of the USSR would not suggest that lack of land in itself could be a cause of continuing agricultural problems. The crucial point, however, is the fact that climatic features of one sort or another place critical limitations on the profitable use of a large part of this land mass. In the US a mountain range intervenes between the best farming areas and the western deserts. In the USSR there is"no barrier between the Asiatic desert and the farm lands of northern Kazakhstan, West Siberia, the Volga drainage basin, the North Caucasus, and the Ukraine. Grain and other crops may flourish in the spring only to be withered by hot desiccating winds sweeping across the Caspian Sea, up the Volga River, or north into the region east of the Ural Mountains. Later in the season, cold air from the Arctic may flow southward, bring- ing rain or even snow at harvest time into the northern European USSR, West Siberia, and northern Kazakhstan. Grain often rots in the field before it can be harvested. Despite these and other natural limitations on land resources, it seems certain that the USSR could provide food for many more millions of people at present levels of consumption and could possibly. raise food consumption, both quantitative and qualitative, to even higher levels. The failure to attain such goals has been, to a very large extent, the result of the system under which Soviet agriculture has been forced to operate, with its attendant ineffi- ciencies and general policy of complete unconcern for the plight of the peasant. The morale of the Soviet peasant is low, and under the collective farm system there is little incentive for farmers to exert themselves to more than the minimum of effort. It is difficult to conceive of any very rapid increase in agricultural production until adequate incentives have been provided. The primary incentives at present apply only to the Communist officials who are in control. They live better than their fellows, they have more privileges, and they enjoy power and prestige of a type. -7- Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP791100935A000300190001-1 Beginning in the fall of 1953, -,he c;oilective farmers were granted some so-celled material incentives, inc]4lding somewhat higher prices for producE' sold, tax adjustments, the reluction of some delivery quotas, and money advances during the year, andl-- most recently -- a portion. of the corn crop has been promised as arl inducement for proper planting and harvesting of the crop. To date, Yowever, there appears to have been no s:_gnificant change in the peasan'ts' lack of enthusiasm for the collectiv_zed system. l1 The oration of collective farms theoretically is in the hands of the collective farmers themselves, but actually there has been a tremendous amou:it of high-level centralized panning, and the farm operations have been under the indirect, or even direct, influence of :Local party and government officials. In March?1955 a decree was issued calling for more local initiative and le s detailed central 1~ direction. In suosequent months the government3has insisted on a swift implementation of this decentralized planning program which, on paper at least, delegates greater responsibility to local officials. This insistence on a rapid shift toward decentralized planning has :Led to farther confusion during a season which ven normally Ls busy and rather confused. In Alril 1955 a decree was issued w.ich, in effect, called for the replacement of one-third of the present collective farm chair- men with workers from the Party, local gove:rnme t offices, an3 economic enterprises. The large-scale turnover of farm chairmen probably is aimed at removing not only incompetents but als those chairmen not completely loyal to the present agricultural pr gram. The new chair- men will take over their new duties after a tra'ning period of only 2 to 6 months. 1,ecause many of the replacements will have primarily urban background,, it is likely that there willjbe further organiza- tional confusion, creating another major hindrance to increasing current agricultural output. It is true that agriculture in the USSR has been mechanized, but although mechanization has released manpower for the development of industry, it has not as yet given to agriculture the definite: benefits that have been achieved in the US. Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79 00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 2. "New Lands" Program. One of the means by which Soviet authorities hope to increase agricultural output is by extending production to virgin and abandoned lands.* Nothing so gigantic in the field of agricultural expansion has been attempted before by the USSR or, probably, by any other nation. This "new lands" program envisages expanding by 1956 the total Soviet sown area by about 20 percent, an area larger than the total sown area of Canada. This new area will be seeded to "grain and other crops." As much as 90 percent may be in spring wheat, and most of the remainder will probably be seeded to millet. It does not follow, however, that increasing breadgrain production is the only aim of the program. Although some increase in the breadgrain area will result, the expansion .of the wheat acreage on the new lands may permit a decrease of the acreage in breadgrains on the old lands and permit the expansion of acreage and output of feed grain, vegetable crops, roughages for live- stock, industrial crops, and the like. In principle, these shifts are rational. If the Soviet government could rely for a large part of its breadgrain procurements on the sparsely populated areas of Siberia and Kazakhstan, it could ease its pressure on collective farms in old areas to deliver grain. The government must be aware that its procurements took too large a share of grain production, that consequently not enough was left on the farms to feed animals or peasants, and that sometimes the pressure on supplies was such that not enough remained for seeding. Khrushchev has stated that more grain is needed for better feeding of the people and animals as well as for reserves and export. There can be little difficulty in demonstrating the need for greater production. The Soviet leaders are placing great reliance on the "new lands" program to satisfy this need. * It should be noted that the good lands -- that is, those lands that have been found profitable to cultivate -- are already under cultivation. Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00P35A000300190001-1 In this program there is something ,rhich is new in degree, if not in kind, in agricultural policy in the U SR. It must be borne in mind that in the USSR most of the major prop uncements previously made about agricultural policy changes have led/to little or no sub- stantive change. This "new lands" program, however, is being imple- mented at a fair:.y rapid rate with the necessary inputs -- labor, machinery, petro=.eum, and transportation. Two :finds of statements are freque tly made that imply that the "new la:.ads" program is likely to fail First, it is argued that two decades ago much of this land was plo Jed and seeded without success. Second, it is stated that the climat fluctuates so greatly around a relatively low level of moisture availability that crop failure will occur at least 2 years out of 5. In the last two decades there have, been substantial improve- ments in power machinery and equipment that e it possible to farm areas that coulc. not have been farmed earlier. The success of the "new lands" program, as far as mechanization s concerned, depends on the degree of e:'fectiveness with which hastil trained mechanics can operate machine,, that are unfamiliar and are ifficult to keep in adjustment. The success or failure of the "neii lands" program may also depend more on the average long-term yie ds that the USSR will consider acceptable than on fairly frequent c op failures. This new lands area is a relatively small par-:, of he total cultivated area of the USER. If the USSR follows Joseph's Egyptian policy and erects facilities for storing grain during t "fat" years, it may be possible to maintain workers in the area despite two or more consecutive years of crop failure -- providedd the average long-term yield is high enough. If this program is maintained, contribution t3 the wheat and millet supply high cost. Soviet officials may decide, nev production even though the program is highly found that the combined resources cost of a per hectare (about 6 bushels per acre) in th high as or even higher than that of an 8-cen is bound to raake some f the USSR -- but at a rtheless, thus to augment uneconomical. It may be et yield of 4 centners new areas may be as ner yield in the old areas. Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 Khrushchev has been quoted as saying that the "new lands" program will break even with average yields no higher than l..8 centners per hectare. For official planning purposes, however, yields of 10 centners per hectare have been used. In view of the inputs being placed on the new lands and the top-level backing the whole program is receiving, it is difficult to believe that the project will be quickly abandoned or even seriously curtailed in the event of a serious crop failure. Preliminary studies indicate, however, that natural limi- tations, particularly climate, may interfere with the long-term success of the "new lands" program. 3. Corn Program. The Soviet plan calls for an increase in corn acreage from 3.5 million hectares in 1953 to 28 million hectares by 1960. The increase amounts to 60 million acres, about two-thirds of the total corn acreage of the US. For the most part, the proposed acreage lies in an area having growing conditions similar to those in the northern half of Wisconsin and Minnesota and in northern South Dakota. Hence any expansion will have to occur in an area where the climate and soils are relatively unfavorable for corn. Furthermore, only a small part of the acreage can be relied upon to produce grain. Khrushchev proposes to plant almost one-third of the total planned corn acreage on land formerly sown to other grain crops, mostly oats and barley. The remainder of the corn is to be planted on land formerly sown to other fodder crops, root crops, and grasses; on pastures and abandoned land; and also, presumably, on summer fallow land. There is a strong probability that the replacement of other grains by corn will have an adverse effect on total grain production. Compared with other grains, corn requires more knowledge and care on the part of the producer and involves a much greater expenditure of labor, machinery, and fertilizers. In most countries it has been found that the risks are less and the rewards greater in producing other grains on what in the case of the Soviet corn pro- gram must be considered to be more or less marginal lands. Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP791T00935A000300190001-1 In order to evaluate the corn program, studies on farm management covering parts or all of the states of Wisconsin, Minnesota, and the Dakotas must be made. In this area the production of corn for silage as well as for grain is important. In the USSR, much of the proposed corn acreage will be harvested for silage In the US as a whole, in recent years, the labor require- ments per acre of corn have been more than three t mes the labor required per acre of wheat. In Wisconsin, Mirneso a, and the Dakotas the production of corn for grain required 13 man-hours of labor and 8 tractor--hours per acre. Equally if not more important is the fact that corn growers used 14+ short tons of manure and"138 pounds of commer- cial fertilizer per acre. Some areas also require varying amounts of lime. The production of corn for silage requ red almost 15 man- hours of labor and 1J tractor-hours per acre. Each acre also received an average of 15-1/4 short tons of manure and 169 pounds of commercial fertilizer. Assuming that soils and climate are similar, the Soviet corn program, if it is to operate on a basis compazable with US per- formance, would require 780 million to 900 millionllman-hours, draft power equivalent to +80 million to 600 million tractor-hours., 760 mil- lion to 830 million metric tons of manure, and 4 million to 5 million metric tons of commercial fertilizer -- to say nothing of other farm equipment, cribs for storing corn, and silos for caring silage.* The availability of seed corn of any sort is also a real problem, and the development and production of sufficient hybrid seed for such an acreage are tasks that would require many years. Soviet plans call for 275 centners of 4ilage per hectare. This is ll metric tcns per acre, compared with the US national average of about 10 metric tons and that in the US north cent al states of from 5 to 6 * It should also be borne in mind that in the USS as much manpower is ?equired to perform a similar the US. This would be especially true in the case the lack of know-how on the part of Soviet farmers corn culture. two or three times 'arm operation as in of corn because of unfamiliar with Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP791T00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 metric tons per acre. It must be remembered that the latter yields were obtained only through the generous application of manure and ferti- lizer, two items which are unlikely to be available to the Soviet farmer in any appreciable quantities. It is likely that without major inputs of lime, manure, and fertilizer, average Soviet yields of silage corn may be no more than the announced 1954 state-farm average of only 80 centners per hectare (c/ha) instead of the present planned 275 c/ha. At 80 c/ha the fodder units per hectare, according to Khrushchev's figures, will be no more than that obtainable from an oat yield of 11.6 c/ha, even considering the full value of both the oat grain and the straw. Furthermore, the labor, machinery, and material input for the corn would be significantly greater. It is extremely doubtful that within the 1955-60 period the corn expansion program will produce a significant increment per hectare above that already being produced-on the same land. In fact, it is not improbable that the whole program will fall. into disrepute along with the previously abandoned projects such. as the grass rotation program in dry areas. 4. Livestock Program. The ultimate goal of the corn program is, of course, to increase livestock production and thereby to increase the supply of meat and milk. Without an increase in the supply of feedstuffs, the livestock program cannot be fulfilled. Assuming, however, that a major part of the feed program is carried out, some increase in meat and milk can be achieved, but it is difficult to see how the live- stock and meat goals set by the government can be attained. The plan for pork production, for example, calls for 30 centners per 100 hectares of arable land, about 27 pounds per acre. Pork production in the US in 1952 totaled 11.5 billion pounds, with an arable land or crop acreage of about 409 million acres. This is equivalent to an average of about 28 pounds of pork per acre, and in doing this the US utilized about 90 million acres of the best corn-growing land in the world. Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00J935A000300190001-1 I7:. European Satellites. A. General. The European Satellites, as indicated b information available as of :15 June 1955, are once more facing the p ospects of a below-normal harvest. This IE. largely a result of spring weather conditions unfavor- able for the seec.ing and development of crops.1 Rumania and Bulgaria are the only European Satellites for which the 1955 outlook indicates a slightly better grain harvest than in 1954 - primarily the result of an expansion of breadgrain acreage. An early spring would have enabled an area in the European Satellites, and an increa have made up for unfulfilled fall sowing plans barley, but there was a 3- to 4-week delay in This delay resulted in nonfulfillment of sprin weather has prevailed through 1 June, retardin of spring crops and delaying harvests. Despit ncrease in the cultivated e in spring sowing would for wheat, rye, and tarting field operations. planting plans. Cool growth and development efforts to increase mechanization and farm labor, there has been o limited success. It is likely, therefore, that the shorter har esting period and the lack of machineE. and men to achieve a timely Y arvest will result in above-normal harvesting losses and will reducq total production. The capability of the European Satellites to effect a signifi- cant increase in agricultural production during the next 5 years (through 1960) Is very unlikely under present ){policies. Although there has been, and probably will continue to be, a substantial increase in investments devoted to agriculture as a means of increas- ing crop yields and animal productivity, the 11-important role of the peasant will determine the effectiveness f these investments. Despite an initial liberal approach to collet ivization with the announcement of the "new course," recent spee hes indicate that a shift to pre-"rew course" collectivization policy is occurring, with officials stating that complete socializatio is the final objective. As long as this, remains the policy, the 'peas t will not have the incentive to increase production -- as has been so well proved in the USSR. Low productivity in agriculture, One of the most important sectors of the economy, will. continue to plaque the European. Satellite governments for many years to come. - 14 - Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 B. Weather and Crop Conditions. 1. Albania. Agricultural production in Albania in 1955 probably will be somewhat lower than in 1954, which was a relatively good year. According to reports by the Ministry of Agriculture, the plans for sowing grain in the fall of 1954 for harvest in 1955 had been fulfilled 102 percent. 12 The greater portion of the fall-sown crops is wheat, and it is estimated that the area sown to wheat in 1955 was approximately 10,000 hectares greater than that of 1954. There are indications, however, that this increase was made at the expense of the spring-sown crops -- corn and spelt. 13 Reports indicate that in the spring sowing program there have been failures which can be attributed partially to above-normal dry weather in the spring and lack of organization on the part of the Machine Tractor Stations. 14 Government plans for 1955 call for a 25-percent increase in wheat production over that of 1954, a 45-percent increase in corn, - a 61-percent increase in cotton, a 102-percent increase in sugar, and a 12-percent increase in tobacco. 15 Because there is only a 10-per- cent increase over 1954 envisioned for the total sown acreage, L6/ it is to be assumed that increases in production are to be achieved by increased yields. Under favorable weather conditions, a slight increase in wheat production may be attained in 1955, but corn and industrial crops probably will remain static or -- if dry weather continues to persist -- may be less than in 1954. Plans for 1955 and the projected output for 1960 indicate a continuing emphasis on agricultural production. The recently an- nounced investment program for 1955 implied a 35-percent increase over 1954. A large portion of this increase undoubtedly will go into land reclamation and irrigation. The long-term outlook for Albania, barring peasant resistance, indicates an increase in the contribution of agriculture to the total national income. The strongest factor Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP791(00935A000300190001-1 favoring a dynamic growth is the reserve of land still available for exploitation. Continued investments for reclaining this land and the introduction of new techniques, education, and acquired skills of mechanized farming could improve the si-:uatibn. 2. Bulgaria. TherE! are indications that 1955 ov production in Bulgaria will be somewhat greater Seeding of grain crops in the fall of 1954 for r-all agricultural than that of 1954. harvest in 1955 onth later than nd the early spring apparently was completed in November, about 1 r9 planned, 17 but the winter was mild and wet, condition of fal:_-sown crops was good. Because of an early spring, 1955 fi relative to the ;;ame period in 1954. In spite criticized failures to meet time schedules for and medium-ripen:ng grains. Above-normal :prec' delayed planned .;chedules and encouraged weed to the development of pastures. Cool weather ' below-normal rainfall during April and May pos growth in the no:'th, but by June the harvestin was in progress In the southern part of Bulgar' Gove:?nment planning for 1955 indic production appro;cimately 21.7 percent greater A larger share of the increase is to result fr stock program. :3ome increase in yields of the but otherwise there has been no indication of crop patterns -- except an expansion of perenn_ which is in line with the current emphasis on industry. 20 ._J I Planted investments in agriculture to be 50 percent greater than during 1954, wit share going into the lagging livestock industr grams. Long-term planning in Bulgaria. thr greatest effort being directed toward increasi and related prodacts. Because of the existing - 16 - eld work was advanced, of this, the press has the sowing of early- pitation during March rowth but was favorable n early spring and ibly retarded rapid of early grain crops a. 18 tes an expected gross han that of 1954. L m an expanded live- major crops is planned, change from the past al fodder grasses, xpanding the =_ivestock during 1955 are expected a proportionately larger and afforestation pro- ugh 1957 shows the g livestock numbers low ratio of ?asture Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP791J00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 availabilities to planned numbers of livestock, modified goals have been projected. The dynamic planned growth of livestock numbers is further hampered by the relatively rigid and inflexible pattern of food and forage crops. With such limitations, it is not expected that any acreages taken out of food crops will be able to supply the additional feed required for carrying larger numbers of livestock. Preliminary production estimates tend to favor a slight increase over 1954 grain and potato production and possibly heavier slaughter weights for livestock.. The situation of industrial crops indicates a static level of production. Although the over-all agri- cultural production in Bulgaria in 1955 probably will be greater than in 1954, the planned increase of 21.7 percent is unrealistic. 3. Czechoslovakia. The present outlook for agriculture in Czechoslovakia for 1955 indicates that the over-all production may not be any better than the below-average production in 1954. Despite significant increases in agricultural investments during 1954 and those planned for 1955, weather and peasant apathy are once again working counter to the desires of the government. The failure of the fall agricultural campaign was well summed up by Prime Minister Siroky when he stated on 11 February 1955 that despite favorable weather conditions the farm work in the autumn of 1954 was not completed. Sowing of grain in the fall of 1954 for harvest in 1955 was greatly delayed, and the plan for increasing the acreage of arable land was not fulfilled. 21 The failure to fulfill tall work plans is further confirmed by the fact that, according; to the Czechoslovak Minister of Agriculture, only 67.3 percent; of fall sowing operations was completed by 25 November 1954, the established deadline. 22 In addition, fall plowing by the Machine Tractor Stations was fulfilled by only 71.4 percent by 5 December 1.954. 23 Adverse weather during December prevented further field operations, and both sowing and fall plowing plans were drastically underful- filled. - 17 - Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79 00935A000300190001-1 An early spring would have enabled farmers to increase spring grain acreage, but there was a late spring, and the start of spring field operations was delayed by nearly 30 days. 24 As a result, an abnormally larger amount of work hai to be performed in a shorter period of time. It is estimated that because of this situation the sewing plans for grain, potatoes and sugar beets were not fulfilled. The entire spring has been characthrized by below-normal temperatures and inadequate sunshine, and the .evelopment of spring- planted crops has been retarded. Field observers reported near-freezing temperatures in the northern half of Czechoslovakia and heavy frost as far south as Roznava as late as 18 May. 25J The late spring means that the harvest of field crops will have to be performed in a shorter than normal period of time, as was the situation ir. 1954. In view of inadequate arm mechanization and labor shortages, high harvesting losses may re. Is ult. Unless exceptionally good weather prevails, the prospect for any increase in agricultural output, especially of field crops, over the low 1954 level is unlikely. Planned increases 26 in yields per hectare of 20 percent for grain and more tian 30 percent for oil crops will definitely not be attained. In 1955-56, Czechoslovakia, a foo -deficit country attempting to increase its level of self -suffipiency as part of the "new course," will once again be dependen'; on imports for a signifi- cant share of the food requirements of the urban population. Because of the low agricultural production in 1954, coLipled with insufficient food imports during 1954-55, Czechoslovakia is closing the consumption year ending 30 .:une 1955 with a shortage of food supplies. 4. East. Germany. Pre;uent indications are that the ]955 over-all agricultural production in East Germany may be lower than ghat of the poor 1954 crop year. Any drop below the 1954 level would make even more critical the present low availability of food. - 18 - Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP791j00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 Although rather favorable weather prevailed in East Germany during the fall of 1954 for the seeding of grains to be harvested in 1955 (winter grains), it is probable that plans were not fulfilled 100 percent for wheat, barley, or oilseeds. The Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry announced that as of 6 December the sowing of winter wheat was 93.3 percent completed. 27 No mention of barley was made, which could be interpreted as indicating an unsatisfactory situation. It is likely that above-normal precipitation prevented the seeding of grain any later than 1Q December. Seeding of winter rye was claimed. to have been fulfilled by 96.5 percent 28 as of 3 November, and, therefore, the plan probably was fulfilled. The 1955 plan, however, calls for about 150,000 hectares less area devoted to rye than was sown in 1954. 29. j~d The mild winter and above-normal precipitation gave winter grains a good start. Contrary to the situation in 1953-54, when high losses occurred as a result of winter kill, there was no evidence of winter kill this year. In March 1955 it was estimated that winter grain and forage crops looked better than they did a year ago. 30 Above-normal precipitation and below-normal temperatures during February, March, and April delayed spring field operations by some 3 to 4 weeks. 31 This meant that an above-normal amount of field work had to be done in a short period -- at a time when the government was demanding a 15-percent increase in field crops. 32 It is doubtful that spring planting plans were fulfilled. One source claimed that only a few Agricultural Producers' Cooperatives fulfilled their spring plans. 33 Another problem in spring planting in East Germany was the shortage of seed. It is not known how serious the situation was, but the agricultural press admitted that difficulties may arise in the planting of oats, barley, and potatoes. 34 The weather during May and the first 10 days of June has been cold. This has delayed both planting and development of spring crops (particularly vegetables) throughout East Germany. As a result the entire harvest season will be later than usual, causing an overlap in harvesting of different crops. With the inadequate mechanization and labor shortage in agriculture, this could mean high harvesting losses. Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79Tf00935A000300190001-1 { Unless there is warm weather and more sunshine, yields of crops maybe less than in 1954. It is believed, however, that total production of grains will be more than in 195!+ because of less loss of acreage from winter kill in 1955 and good soil moisture reserves. Pro- duction forecasts for potatoes, sugar beets, oil drops, and,the like are premature at th::s date, but, assuming normal eather from 10 June to the harvest of these crops, production could bq expected to approx- imate 1954 levels. With more normal temperatures land sunshine, yields of forage crops should be above average. 5. Hungary. I The ove:-all agricultural production in Hungary in :955 probably will be unsatisfactory even though it will be somewhat larger than in 1.954, a drought year. The outlook for 1955 is that the govern- merit's planned increase in production of 7.3 pert nt over 1954 probably will not be realized. 35 Following in the wake of the serious 4ecline in grain produc- tion in 1.954, the government announced its plan fcr sowing almost 2 million hectares in the fal:L of 1954 for harvest in 1955, an expansion of 300,000 hectares over the previous year. 36 Reports as of March 1955 indicate serious shortcomings in the fulfillment of this plan, especially in the private farming secccor. 37 These shortcomings are primarily the result of poor operation of the Machine Tractor Stations even though their equipment had been Lncreased during the year. On the whole, the crops sown in the fill of 1954 weathered the winter without serious damage. There were some r ports of severe freezing, but apparently the -proportion of winter kill was -of greater than normal. A late and wet spring has caused additional delays in field work, and the sowin:; of spring fodder crops was reportedly unsatisfactory. In addition, a shortage of spring wheat seed prev nted the peasants from filling gaps left b;y underfulfillment of fall sowng plans. 38 Field work was hampered by cold weath rain in April, and the development of both fall- has been retarded by the continuing cold weather Hungary. The below-normal precipitation in May h meat of corn, parti2ularly. in March and excessive d spring-sown grains ersisting throughout s delayed the develop- Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP791T00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 After the devastating experience in the agricultural sector in 1954, the Hungarian government has allocated to agriculture 26.2 percent of all budgetary investments in 1955. 39 This artificial stimulant comes too late, however, to offset the depressing effects of the extremes of weather and the underfulfillment of plans because of organizational difficulties. As of early June, the outlook for the 1955-56 food supply, although slightly better than that of 1954-55, is unsatisfactory, and it may become worse. 6. Poland. Indications are that 1955 over-all agricultural production in Poland will about approximate that of 1954 and that the 6.2-percent increase planned for 1955 40 probably will not be achieved. This generally unfavorable outlook in Poland is, in part, the result of failure to fulfill the plowing and sowing plans in the fall of 1954 for seeding and harvest in 1955. 41 Failure to fulfill these fall plans, in turn, has increased the workload in the spring, thus reducing the probability of fulfillment of ambitious spring sowing plans. Over 60 percent (9 million hectares) of Poland's arable land was to be sown in the spring of 1955, and, in addition, 160,000 hectares of fallow land were to be put into cultivation. 42/ In view of the chronic inefficiencies of the Machine Tractor Stations -- especially low tractor productivity, which was largely responsible for the nonfulfillment of plans in the fall of 1954 -- it seems unlikely that spring sowing operations were fulfilled. Furthermore, bad weather in March and April delayed sowing operations as much as 3 weeks, L3/ and lagging sowing plans were severely criticized in the Polish press as recently as early May. 44 Although favorable weather conditions prevailed. throughout most of May, plant growth was set back in late May and early June by a cold spell which in some regions resulted in killing frosts. In many areas, grains seeded in the fall of 1954 for harvest in 1955 (winter grains) were underdeveloped, and planting of potatoes was still in progress in early June. 45 This increased the necessity for favor- able weather conditions throughout June and July to insure a fair crop. Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 The chief tasks of the Polish agricul, include increasing agricultural production by exp; and increasing the ;yields per acre. Considerable socialist enterprises -- collective and state fare plated, although government hopes of by 3,000 units annually in 195 55 are precisely these socialist enterprises, however, w laggards in fulfillLng government plans. aural program in 1955 nding the sown area expansion of the s -- is also c:ontem- e socialist sector t plan. 46 It is kith are the greatest The 1955 agricultural program is to b financed by an alloca- tion of 12.1 billion zlotys from the Polish budge , an increase of 21.8 percent over the alLocation in 1954. 47 As mentioned above, 160,000 hectares of fallow Land were to be put into cultivation during 1955 as part of the government's long-range plans to increase the arable land. Inputs of fertilizers during spring sowing alone were to increase by 130,000 metric tons over 1954. 48 It is unknown whether or not these inputs were realized, but general availability of fertilizers should be greater than in :L954 because of expansion of fertilizer p oduction in the newly opened Kedzierzyn giant and the expansion of the herzow and Tarnow plants. 49/ Increaees in livestock numbers have -been noted. Because of the emphasis on livestock production as well as increased per capita human grain consumption, 50 however, Poland has ecome a grain-deficit country and has hat. to resort to imports to supplement domestic produc- tion. In the past 12 months, Poland imported almost 1 million tons of grain from non-Bloc; countries. 51 In view of p esent conditions, it seems likely that grain production in 1955 will e no greater than the 11, million tons produced in 1954- 52 In that case, Poland will have to continue to import grains to support the present livestock develop- ment program and to maintain the present human consumption pattern. 7. Rumanil. I The over-all agricultural production in Rumania in 1955 probably will be somewhat greater than that of 1954. In the fall of 1954 some 3.4 million hectares (chiefly wheat and rye) were seeded for the harvest of 1955. This was approximately 300,000 hectares more than was seeded in 1953 for harvest in 1954. 53 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP791j00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 Because of more favorable weather, a larger amount of field work was performed during the fall of 1954 than during the fall of 1953. The winter was relatively mild, with conditions about normal, and fall- sown crops wintered well. Ground moisture was considerably increased by above-normal precipitation during the fall and winter months. Spring field work and sowing were delayed, however, because of cold weather and continuous rains during March and the beginning of April. 54 Because of reported better organization of Machine Tractor Stations and the increase of other farming equipment, a greater part of the spring work was completed before the end of April. 55 The rapid development of weeds necessitated extra work in corn fields, but up to June the development of small grains was satisfactory. Favorable weather in May helped the rapid development of wheat, rye, and barley, 56 and abundant ground moisture has given a good start to the corn crop. . The announced government program to increase agricultural production in 1955 made specific reference to grain production as the most important factor in agricultural development. The 1955 plan calls for a grain production of 10 million metric tons, of which 60 percent is reflected in the expanded corn program. The 1954 grain crop was estimated at 6 million metric tons. 57 The acreage of grain has been slightly expanded, and weather conditions up to June have been favorable. The prospects for the 1955 grain harvest indicate a somewhat better crop than in 1954, but the planned figure of 10 million metric tons of grain in 1955 is unrealistic. C. Outlook for Agricultural Production. One important problem that the European Satellites have in common is their low agricultural production. This problem was brought to the attention of the world with the announcement of the "new course" policy measures in the summer and fall of 1953. These announcements stressed the fact that agricultural production had not attained prewar levels and in some areas was in a state of decline. Two major reasons were given -- directly, the inadequate agricultural investments, and, indirectly, the collectivization program. Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79 00935A000300190001-1 Investments were immediately increasd for agriculture, and increases have continued into 1955. The investments have primarily been channeled into machinery, fertilizer, buildings, and livestock. As in the past, the socialized sector was favored. The collectivization program, which temporarily cane to a halt in some countries and was slowed down in o4ers, was revitalized in the last half of 1954. Propaganda and possib.y economic pressures are once again being applied in the countryside in order to increase the membership of the collectives. Each of the European Satellite governments has announced that eventual socialization of agriculture is the answer to increasing both agricultural production and procure- ment of farm produce. I One incentive which the European Satllite governments thought might raise agricultural production and Zielp them procure a larger share of the production was an increase o~ the peasants' supply of manufactured consumer goods. In 1954, produc ion in light Industry was emphasized, and there was an increase in thesupply of consumer goods to the rural areas. The increase, howeverl was not enough to effect an increase in either production or procu'ement of agricultural products in 1954. As of 15 June, no appreciable increase over 1954 is foreseen in the 1955 availability of manufacture consumer goods for the countryside. Phis will mean a continued shortage of incentive consumer goods that might at least cause the pea ant to market a greater share of his production. T On the basis of these facts, it is estimated that no signifi- cant increases in agricultural output (especiall livestock) will take place in the European Satellites during the next 5 years -- to the extent that prewar levels will be attained -- other than what may result from excellent weather Ln any one year. The Co>unists have failed to consid the human element Ln agricultural production. A knows that he will eventually have to give up hi collective, there Is no incentive for him to mak ments in his farm necessary to raise crop yields A similar situation prevails in the socialist se r the importance of long as the peasant land and join a the increased invest- and animal productivity. tor, where the collective and state farm members do not have the personal nterest in the tending and caring for field crops and livestock, and th result is lower Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP791j00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 production than on privately held land. This has been proved by Soviet experience. Therefore, should there be a drive toward complete collec- tivization of the European Satellite farmers, or at least a reversion to the pre-"new. course" collectivization policy, agricultural production could well decline. In any event, it is estimated that the European Satellites, in total, will not be ab1_e.to increase agricultural output at a'rate higher than that of the increase in population and that they will not attain prewar levels of production by 1960. Under present Communist policies the problem of trying to establish an agricultural production base adequate to meet requirements will be with the European Satellites long after 1960. Communi t;China. Communist China is faced with new agricultural setbacks which threaten the industrial development and military modernization programs. To counter these threats and to maintain exports of foodstuffs, the Communist regime has been tightening controls over food consumption in both rural and urban areas.- Some open unrest resulting from these measures has been reported. The production outlook for the early crops being harvested, in June in most of Communist China is poor, but the harvest will relieve somewhat the general food shortage and the starvation prevalent in certain locali- ties. The crops sown last fall, which are about to be harvested, normally constitute about 30 percent of Communist China's annual food output. These crops have been hit by a series of disasters -- planting problems caused by undrained land, 58 other aftereffects of last summer's disastrous floods, 59 a severe winter, 60 and the spring drought which has affected all of China except Manchuria and the Yangtze Valley. 61 The Chinese Communist press has already conceded that in the North China plains, a major wheat-producing area, there have been losses to the. wheat crop as a result of the drought. / The drought in the South China province of Kwangtung is said by Communist sources to have been the most severe in more than 90 years. 63 The food situation there is expected to remain critical until after the late summer rice harvests. 61+ Meanwhile, thousands of refugees and destitute farmers are reportedly fleeing to Macao and Hong Kong. 65 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP791J00935A000300190001-1 As ;yet there as been no announcement o' mitigation of agricultural taxes in kind or cf quotas for peasants' forced sales, both of which are set on the basis cif norms. To combat the condition of general. scarcity, the Chinese Communist government, which con-crolsl the distribution of most of the country's food, has intensified the austerity campaign by reducing allocations to both rural and urban markets lath this spring. / In recent months, rationing in cities, first adopted on a wide scale last year, has been extended to more items in more areas. 67 Recently adopted urban austerity measures appear designed to reduce the food rations of popula';ion groups less favored by the regime. 68 Another gover:unent action taken this spring to cope with agricultural problems has been the strengthening of the Part Cadres, the real rulers of rural China. 6'Tj This effort to increase Patty control over th~vests peasants probably indicates that immediately after the 1955 fall there will be stricter procurement policies anda renewed drive for the development of Agricultural Producers' Cooperatves, an elementary form of collective. To cope with food riots in the starvation fleas and with other manifestations of hostility, the Chinese Communist regime apparently has strengthened security forces in the country0ide. Communist control of any appreciable area, however, apparently ha not been seriously endangered. Because of the disastrous 1954 floods in the Yangtze Valley, China's "rice-bowl" area, this year's planned exports of rice to Ceylon -- about 300,000 metric tons -- have been coming from Caton, 70 despite the critical food situation in South China. Rice exports from South China to Macao were increased in late 1954, and ~axpoAs to Hong Kong were re- sumed in early 1955 after an interval of sever4 years. 71 Moreover, the Chinese Commimists continue to ship rice to the USSR. The Communist regime has contracted to buy from Burma this y ar 300,000 metric tons of rice, which will offset part of the Chinese Co' ist rice exports. The Chinese Communists have often publicly! expressed the:Lr determina- tion to export foodstuffs to pay for industria'- imports. 72 72/ They are expected to try -"o maintain net exports at the level of previous years. - 26 - Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP791j00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 The Communist regime has announced a 1955 food target calling for an increase of 6 percent over last year's production. 73 This goal may not be reached unless the fall harvests are larger than normal. As has happened in all other years since the Communists came to power in 191+9, food production on a grain equivalent basis again may fail. to reach the average output of the prewar years from 1931 to 1937. These failures, reminiscent of the difficulties experienced in the USSR during the early years of Soviet economic development, appear to have been a principal factor behind the acceleration of socialization and state controls and the adoption of increasingly harsh austerity policies in Communist China during the past 2 years. The peasant hostil- ity aroused by the regime's actions is regarded by some observers 71+ as constituting a major potential source of instability -- unless, of course, the regime chooses to moderate its policies at the expense of the current rate of industrial and military development. There are no indications, however, that the regime is inclined toward such a major shift in its planning. Recent official statements indicate that the Communist regime now recognizes that the rise in food output dur- ing the first two Five Year Plans (1953-62) will be limited because of the low priority assigned to allocation of investment resources to the agricultural sector of the economy. The Communist regime has clearly abandoned hopes expressed early in the First Five Year Plan for an in- crease of as much as 70 percent in food output by 1962. Actually, during the first two Five Year Plans the rise in food output probably will not exceed 9 or 10 percent and may be much less. 75 Estimated population growth during this period will almost certainly keep pace with the rise in food production. After that it will be impossible to maintain an equilibrium without substantial inputs of fertilizer. The two principal means of achieving agricultural increases in. China -- the application of chemical fertilizer and the opening up of new land with mechanized equipment -- will not be attempted o:n a large scale until the Third Five Year Plan (1963-67), according to a March 1955 76 report by the Minister of Agriculture to the State Council. - 27 - Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00 35A000300190001-1 It is estimated that the supply of chemical! fertilizer in Communist China will rise from about 500,000 metric tons ;n 1953 to only 1 million metric tons in 1;60. At least 10 million to 15 million metric tons are needed to achieve significant crop increases. TO A modest plan to expand acreage during the 'next 5 to 7 years was recently announced. The plan envisages the ad ition of only 6 percent to Communist China's present cultivated acreag . 78 Meanwhile, Communist China plans to ccncen*rate on expansion of ir- rigation and water conservation works as its min effort to expand food output, and modest increases can be expected from this program. 79 In view of these unfavorable long-range prospects the rising needs of the regime fc,r foodstuffs are to be met by ~n accelerated drive to increase in several ways the regime's control over agricultural output. These unfavorable agricultural prospects, the drive toward socialized farming, and other harsh rural policies of th regime have led some observers to conclude that during the first t o Five Year Plans there is in Communist China a reasonable possibilit of a peasant reaction similar to that of an important portion of the peasants in the USSR during its First Five Year Plan. 80 Neither this possibility nor that of a more open peasant revolt appears tolworry the Communist regime, which has already developed effective security controls in the countryside. 'Unless such a serious reaction occurred,Jagricultural failures probably would have no great effect on Chinee Communist military plans. The wo:,st food situation in the regi e's history occurred in early 1950. Liter in the year the Chinese Communists intervened in Korea. The fo3d situation remained poor butlwas slowly recovering in 1951, and early 1952 when the Chinese Conmuni is committed and supplied some 700,000 Chinese Communist troops in the Korean War. 8W - 28 - Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP779T00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 SOURCE REFERENCES Evaluations, following the classification entry and designated "Eval.," have the following significance: Doc. - Documentary A - Completely reliable B - Usually reliable C - Fairly reliable D - Not usually reliable E - Not reliable F - Cannot be judged 1 - Confirmed by other sources 2 - Probably true 3 - Possibly true 4 - Doubtful 5 - Probably false 6 - Cannot be judged "Documentary" refers to original documents of foreign governments and organizations; copies or translations of such documents by a staff officer; or information extracted from such documents by a staff officer, all of which may carry the field evaluation "Documentary." Evaluations not otherwise designated are those appearing on the cited document; those designated "RR" are by the author of this report. No "RR" evaluation is given when the author agrees with the evaluation on the cited document. 1. Army, Moscow. DA IN 147602, 18 Jun 55, WEEKA 25 AGR, C. Eval. RR 2. 2. Ibid. 3. Selskoye khozyaystvo, 14 Oct 54, U. Eval. RR 2. Sovkhoznaya gazeta, 17 Oct 54, U. Eval. RR 2. 4. Pravda, 21 Jan 55, U. Eval. RR 2. Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP791100935A000300190001-1 ,Selskoye khozyaystvo, 10 and 11 May 55, U. val. RR 2. Army, Moscow. DA IN 141660, 21 May 55, WEEK 21 AGR, C. ]Eval. RR 2. Pravda, 6 May 55, U. Eval. RR 2. Selskoye khozyaystvo, 13 May 55, U U. ivai. ttrc e. TT 11.. Army, Moscow. DA IN 147602, 18 Jun 55, WEE 25 AGR, C. Eval. RR 2. 12. CIA.. FDD, Summary, no 438, 1 Apr 55, p. 1, . Eval. RR 2. 13. FitAb39D, Summary, no 367, 31 Jan 55, p. 2, C. Eval. RR 2. 19. CIA., FDD, Summary, no 438, 1 Apr 55, p. 4-6, C. Eval. RR . Eval. RR 2. 21. State, Prague. Dsp 275, 17 Feb 55, U/OFF US ~ 22. CIA. FDD, Summar , no 357, 24 Jan 55, 1). 2,1C. Eval. RR 2. 27. CIA. FDD, Summary, no 384, 14 Feb 55, C. E al. RR 2. 28. CIA. FDD, Summary, no 348, 18 Jan 55, p. 5,1C. Eval. RR 2. 29. 30. State, HICOG, Berlin. Dsp 2l, 20 Apr '55, U. val. RR 2. 31. CIA. Current Support Memorandum 261, 23 Mar 55, C. 32. State, HICOG, Berlin. Dsp 821, 20 Apr 55, U. Eval. RR 2. 33. 34. State, HICOG, Berlin. Dsp 21, 20 Apr 575, U. Eval. RR 2. 25X1A2g 25X1X7 25X1A2g 25X1A2g Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP791(00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 25X1X7 FOIAb3b 25X1X7 FOIAb3b FIQ1Ab,te, Warsaw. 42. Ibid. F)IAb~te, Warsaw. Dsp 483, 3 Jun 55, C. Eval. RR 2. te. Warsaw. Dsp 154. 12 Oct 54. U/OFF USE. Ev 49. Ibid. 50. CIA. FDD, Summary, no 478, 4 May 55, U/OFF USE. Eval. RR 2. (tr from Nowe drogi, Feb 55,U) 51. State, Antwerp. Dsp 382, 3 May 55, U/OFF USE. Eval. RR 2. 52. CIA. FDD, Summary, no 478, 4 May 55, U/OFF USE. Eva:L. RR 2. OIAb3br frnm Nrmra rirnai Wale rr, TT1 F&Ab ' ORR Project 10.402, Probable Developments in the European tellites through 1957 and through 1960 (unpublished S. Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79TO9935A000300190001-1 59. Ibid. 6o. Ibid. 61. Army., Hong Kong. Dsp 2356, 28 May 55, JOINT IEEKA 21, C. Eval. RR 3. F it erce, Weather Bureau. Maps, 1951+-55, C. 1 Eval. RR 2. 3.. Stage, Hong Kong. Survey of the China Mainlnd Press, no =_0 12 May 55, in:?o 11 May 55, U. Eval. RR 3. 61+. State, Hong Ko:ig. Dsp 21+17, 3 Jun 55, JOINT;IWEEKA 22, S. Eval. RR 3. 65,. Ibid. 66. Ibid.. 67. Army, Hong Kong. Dsp 21+18, 3 Jun 55, JOINT WEEKA 22, C. Army, Hong Kong. Dsp 2356, 27 May 55, JOINTJWEEKA 21, S. Eval. RR 2. 68. Ibid. 69. Army, Hong Korg. Dsp 21+17, 3 Jun 55, JOINT EEKA 22, S. Eval. RR 2. 70. State, Columbc,. Dsp 515, 21 Apr 55, C. Eva1. RR 2. 1. IA. OCI, Current Intelligence Digest, 3 May 55, item 10, F~IAb Eval. RR 2. 73. Ibid. 1 71+. State, Hong Kong. Dsp 696, 21 Oct 51+, U. val. RR 3. FQkAb3bDid. 77. Shen, T.H. Agricultural Resources of China Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1951, p. 36, U. Eval. 4 2.. FC~~Ab3ate, Hong Kong. Survey of the China Main and Press, no 963, T._ _.. C TT 1T_.... I M73 5 2 80. State, Hong Yong. Dsp 696, 21 Oct 54, u/00 USE. Eval. RR 3. 81. CIA. OCI, Ci:.rrent Intelligence Weekly Revi6 w, 24 Feb 55, S. Eval. RF; 3. Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1 NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS Approved For Release 1999/09/21 : CIA-RDP79T00935A000300190001-1