BEHIND THE LINES

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79T00428A000200040022-8
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 22, 2005
Sequence Number: 
22
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 30, 1962
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79T00428A000200040022-8.pdf182.63 KB
Body: 
Warren Rogers Jr.-- WASHINGTON. first questions it will ask will be this: how good is our military intelligence on Cuba and Russia? :Kennedy administration officials have been sayin:; all along that it Is very good. They have produced supporting 1.-evidance, including the remarkably clear aerial photo- : (graphs and a good deal of precise information gained .? through other. means. The Administration has not told all it knows eaoat the Soviet shipment of offensive weapons shippea tto Cuba. It has told only enough to make its point. For example, this reporter knows the United States had extremely ac- curate knowledge of what was in those Soviet ships. and the Russians knew we knew. This is not the sort of knowl- edge to be gained through aerial photography and so the obvious inference is that the United States has agents in the ports from which the cargo was shipped. But this is after-the-fact intelligence. Congress will want to know, for example, how the Russians managed to get the rockets to Cuba in the first place and it will ask why the existence of such rockets in the Soviet arsenal was not known in advance-or, if it was known, why this was not made public. Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara has said the medium-range and intermediate-range Soviet missiles are unlike anything the United States possesses. Congress will be asking why this is so. The question is particularly pertinent because Gen. Lauris Norstad, NATO Supreme Commander, has been pressing, for two years for a mobile medium-range missile like the one the Russians sent to Cuba. Gen. Norstad had been scheduled to retire Nov. 1, but is staying in his post until Jan. 1 because of the Cuban crisis. Mr. McNamara has been cool to the idea. He says such a weapon would cost about $2 billion and is of doubt- ful value. But he offered to build one if the NATO coun- .tries would pay for it. So far, it has reached only the first stage, "program definition." This make it too tenuous to be included in the new Defense budget unless it becomes i more urgent matter. FIVE MEN BEHIND THE SCENES Approved For Release 2005/06/01 : CIA-RDP79T00428A000200040022-8 ?U New York -ferO 'T Fd and-mouse game of collecting and analyzing the intelli- gence data on-Cuba.. They_are: -Air Force Lt. Gen. Joseph F. Carroll, chief of the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency. A former top assistant to FBI .director J. Edgar Hoover, Joe Carroll is a brilliant intelligence officer. When the Air Force was organized 15 years ago he created its Intelligence branch. When DIA was formed a year ago, unifying military intelligence for the first time, he was a natural to head it. -Army Lt. Gen. William W. Quinn, Joe Carroll's deputy. "Buffalo Bill" Quinn, a football and lacrosse star at West Point in the 1930s, Is a tough combat commander, a former chief of Army information, and a -wear Adm. Samuel B. Frankel, Joe Carroil's other deputy. He speaks Chinese and Russian and is an expert on Red China and the Soviet Union. His Approved For Release 2005/06/01 : Associated Press TALK TEAM-Two of the three named by President Kennedy yesterday to handle negotiations with Cuba were, left, [der Secretary of State George Ball, and Deputy Secretary of Defense Boswell L. Gilpatric. ?ohn McCloy will head the group. lion of the Central Intelligence Agency. "Pat" Carter served on the Marshall mission to China after World War II, as a military aide in Europe with the rank of ;.sinister, and as a member of U. S. delegations to in- ternational conferences in Rio de Janeiro, Bogota and Mexico City. -Adm. Jerauld Wright, former commander of the Atlantic Fleet, and currently, by special act of a Con- gress, a full-tune consultant to the CIA. His long Naval career involved him intimately with NATO and Caribbean affairs and made him especially valuable during the Cuban crisis. These men will be queried on Capitol Hill during the "military posture" hearings in January. How they answer may well determine, among other things, how fast or slow Secretary McNamara may hereafter proceed with his pro- gram to unify the armed forces. MIST REAL UNIFICATION TEST . Cuba was the first real test of unification. If it is found that unified intelligence did a better job than ,the three services could have done individually, Congress 1 will look more favorably on unification in other fields. Iffnot, the selling job McNamara had done will come unglued. Other questions are tantalizingly persistent. J For example: if the Russians could suddenly come up with a iiia.hiy mobile missile with a 1,100-mile range and also a hitherto unheard-of missile with a 2,200-mile range, what did they do to achieve it? Did they take existing rockets and give them added range by making the nuclear war- head smaller (since there is a direct ratio between range and weight of payload) ? If so, of what effect will this have on Soviet inter- continental ballistic missiles? Will the Russians be able to do what the United States has done-that is, build a lot of small-yield ICBMs, and even put them on sub- marines? If so, will this hasten the day of nuclear stale- mate, when the American umbrella of nuclear superiority will no longer prevail? Much secret data on these points plus pictures far clearer than those made public will be turned over to the NATO Council at its December meeting. The N;'rTO Coun- cil may be forced to make new decisions, in light of obvi- ous Soviet gains in medium-range and it.ttsr i.ti*~c ii'.t range roeketni . CIA-RDP79T00428A000200040022--8 --