MAIN TRENDS IN SOVIET CAPABILITIES AND POLICIES, 1958-1963

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
81
Document Creation Date: 
December 23, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 18, 2013
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 23, 1958
Content Type: 
NIE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8.pdf6.55 MB
Body: 
Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 N 1 E 1-1 ? 4 ? 5 8 23 December 1958 0 3 4 9 8 2 TOP CRET N? 645 NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE ESTIMATE NUMBER 11-4-58 (Supersedes NIE 11-4-57) MAIN TRENDS IN SOVIET CAPABILITIES AND POLICIES, 1958-1963 Submitted by the DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE The following intelligence organizations participated in the preparation of this estimate: The Central Intelligence Agency and the intelligence organizations of the Departments of State, the Army, the Navy, the Air Force, The Joint Staff, Defense, and the Atomic Energy Commission. Concurred in by the UNITED STATES INTELLIGENCE BOARD on 23 December 1958. Concurring were The Director of In- telligence and Research, Department of State; the Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence, Department of the Army; the Assistant Chief of Naval Operations for Intelligence, Depart- ment of the Navy; the Assistant Chief of Staff, Intelligence, USAF; the Director for Intelligence, The Joint Staff; the Assistant to the Secretary of Defense, Special Operations; and the Atomic Energy Commission Representative to the USIB. The Director of the National Security Agency and the Assistant Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, ab- stained, the subject being outside of their jurisdiction. CUMENT NU. .1 OC\ ,T.OP SE ET kr; CHANCE IN CLASS. 0 CLASS. CHANGED TO: IS Ci71) NEXT FiE'fIEW DATE: HR 70-2 DATE; Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 _ , 1 CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY DISSEMINATION NOTICE 1. This estimate was disseminated by the Central Intelligence Agency. This copy is for the information and use of the recipient indicated on the front cover and of per- sons under his jurisdiction on a need to know basis. Additional essential dissemination may be authorized by the following officials within their respective departments: a. Director of Intelligence and Research, for the Department of State b. Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence, Department of the Army c. Assistant Chief of Naval Operations for Intelligence, for the Department of the Navy d. Director of Intelligence, USAF, for the Department of the Air Force e. Director for Intelligence, Joint Staff, for the Joint Staff f. Director of Intelligence, AEC, for the Atomic Energy Commission g. Assistant Director, FBI, for the Federal Bureau of Investigation h. Assistant to the Secretary of Defense, Special Operations, for the Depart- ment of Defense i. Director of the NSA, for the National Security Agency j. Assistant Director for Central Reference, CIA, for any other Department or Agency 2. This copy may be retained, or destroyed by burning in accordance with appli- cable security regulations, or returned to the Central Intelligence Agency by arrange- ment with the Office of Central Reference, CIA. 3. When an estimate is disseminated overseas, the overseas recipients may retain it for a period not in excess of one year. At the end of this period, the estimate should either be destroyed, returned to the forwarding agency, or permission should be re- quested of the forwarding agency to retain it in accordance with IAC-D-69/2, 22 June 1953. 4. The title of this estimate, when used separately from the text, should be classified: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY WARNING This material contains information affecting the National Defense of the United States within the meaning of the espionage laws, Title 18, USC, Secs. 793 and 794, the trans- mission or revelation of which in any manner to an unauthorized person is prohibited by law. DISTRIBUTION: White House National Security Council Department of State Department of Defense Operations Coordinating Board Atomic Energy Commission Federal Bureau of Investigation Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 --T-83NP. SECRET TABLE OF CONTENTS Page THE PROBLEM 1 SUMMARY ESTIMATE 1 DISCUSSION 10 I. INTERNAL POLITICAL DEVELOPMENTS 10 Ascendancy of Khrushchev 10 Role of the Party 11 Issues in Soviet Politics 12 Attitudes in Soviet Society 12 The Longer View 13 II. TRENDS IN THE SOVIET ECONOMY 14 General 14 Shifts in Economic Policy 14 Prospects for Economic Growth 16 Trends in Defense Expenditures 17 Industrial Prospects 17 Agricultural Prospects 19 Trends in Consumption 19 Foreign Trade 20 III. TRENDS IN SOVIET SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 22 Scientific Manpower, Training and Facilities 22 Soviet Capabilities in Major Scientific Fields 25 Space Program 25 Nonmilitary Applications of Atomic Energy 26 Physics and Mathematics 26 Geophysics 26 Chemistry and Metallurgy 27 Medical Sciences 27 Biological and Agricultural Sciences 27 Industrial Technology 27 IV. DEVELOPMENTS AFFECTING THE SOVIET MILITARY POSTURE 28 Soviet Military Thinking and Policy 28 Major Objectives of Military Policy 28 Soviet Attitudes Toward Limited and General War 28 Policy on Size and Types of Forces 30 Military Policy Toward Other Bloc Nations . 31 Special Weapon Developments 31 Nuclear Weapons 31 Guided Missiles 33 Intercontinental Ballistic Missile 33 Chemical and Biological Warfare 34 Electromagnetic Warfare 35 ?label) SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A0110\00020001-8 .TeerIC SECRET TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page Strengths and Capabilities of Soviet Forces 35 High Command 35 Long-Range Striking Forces 36 Long-Range Bombers 36 Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles 38 Other Long-Range Ballistic Missiles 39 Missile-Launching Submarines 40 Capabilities for Long-Range Attack 40 Air Defense Forces 41 Air Defense Weapons 41 Air Defense Radar and Control Equipment 42 Air Defense Concentrations 42 Passive Defense 42 Air Defense Capabilities 42 Ground Forces and Tactical Air Forces 43 Capabilities for Major Land Campaigns 45 Against Western Europe and Scandinavia . 45 Against Greece, Turkey, and the Middle East 46 In the Far East 46 Naval Forces 46 Submarine Construction 47 Capabilities for Naval Warfare 48 V. TRENDS IN SOVIET RELATIONS WITH OTHER COMMU- NIST STATES 49 Relations with the Satellites 50 Prospects 50 Bloc Relations with Yugoslavia 51 Relations with Communist China 52 VI. TRENDS IN SOVIET FOREIGN POLICY 54 Introduction ? The Current Conduct of Soviet Policy 54 Current Soviet Objectives and Main Lines of Policy 55 Attitude Toward War 55 A Posture for "Peace" 56 The Underdeveloped Countries in Soviet Strategy . 57 -Trade and Aid 57 Attitude Toward the UN 58 Disarmament 58 Soviet Policy in Particular Areas 58 The Middle East 58 Asia 60 Africa 60 Western Europe 60 Latin America 62 ANNEX 63 ....7.401' SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 EY'r SECRET MAIN TRENDS IN SOVIET CAPABILITIES AND POLICIES, 1958-1963 THE PROBLEM To review significant developments affecting the USSR's internal political situ- ation, economic developments, military programs, relations with other Bloc states, and foreign policy, and to estimate probable Soviet courses of action through about 1963.1 SUMMARY ESTIMATE 1. New tendencies have appeared on the Soviet political scene during the past year. Externally, the lines of conflict with the West have been drawn more sharply once again, and "reduction of tensions" no longer is the major theme of Soviet for- eign policy. Internally there has been both in the USSR and in the Bloc an attempt to consolidate and stabilize, to check the pace of change, to curb the expectations and discipline the unruly tendencies aroused among the people by the milder policies of the post-Stalin years. There has been a return to a cer- tain rigor in policy and in ideology. Nev- ertheless, the changes which affected almost every aspect of Soviet internal and external policy in the years after Stalin's death have for the most part not been reversed. The flexibility and pragmatism of the current leadership continues; inno- vations in policy may still be forthcoming, particularly in internal affairs. The reference to a five-year period is approxi- - mate. The economic calculations carry through 1965, to conform to the Soviet Seven-Year Plan; some of the political judgments, on the other hand, pertain to periods of less than five years. Trends in Foreign Policy 2. During the course of the last year there has been a distinctly hardening tone in Soviet foreign policy. It is true that many of the new features introduced after the death of Stalin remain in force. The claim to be pursuing policies in the inter- est of establishing "peaceful coexistence" is still made; programs of cultural ex- change and generally freer contact with the outside world have been continued. Nevertheless, a new militancy and asser- tiveness in Soviet policy has emerged more and more clearly. This has been most strikingly manifest in the Quemoy and Middle East crises, and in the developing crisis over Berlin. 3. The Soviet leaders probably decided that the special emphasis they had given to "peaceful coexistence" and easing of tensions had out-lived its usefulness. It had not had the anticipated effect of weakening Western alliances. Some fea- tures of the relaxation line?the new ap- proach to Yugoslavia, the repudiation of Stalin, and the leeway given for some .0--717P SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 dv;=EFAI'V- SECRET national autonomy in the Satellites? proved dangerous to Soviet authority in Eastern Europe. A return to a harder course probably seemed desirable on these grounds alone. But at the same time, it appeared justified by the Soviet leaders' belief that, in power terms, there had been an enhancement of the Bloc's position and a decline in that of the West. This belief probably was based in the first place on Soviet weapons advances and sci- entific achievements. There was also a feeling that the outlook was good for new advances in Bloc economic strength after a period of some difficulty in 1956-1957, while at the same time Western economies were believed to be showing symptoms of economic crisis. Then, too, the Soviet leaders considered that Communist influ- ence was generally growing stronger in underdeveloped countries of Asia, Africa, and the Middle East, while Western influ- ence continued to decline. The confi- dence of the Soviet leaders that they were entering upon a promising phase in the "struggle against imperialism" has been articulated in a new doctrine, namely, that an irrevocable shift in the relation of forces in the world has taken place to the advantage of the Communist Bloc. 4. This more confident and militant atti- tude on the part of the Soviet leadership does not mean that it has revised its atti- tude toward war as an instrument of policy. We continue to believe that the Soviet leaders have no intention of delib- erately initiating general war and still wish to avoid serious risks of such a war. They almost certainly believe that, even with the acquisition of long-range mis- siles capable of striking the US, the scale of damage they would suffer in a general nuclear war would threaten the survival of their regime and society. Moreover, 2 they regard the final victory of Com- munism as inevitable, and to be achieved mainly through political forms of struggle. The maintenance and fur- ther strengthening of great military power is primarily intended to deter a resort to force by the "imperialist" enemy, and to count as a weighty factor in per- suading him to submit peacefully to a succession of political reverses as the revolutionary tide advances. Situations might arise, however, in which the Soviets would judge that military force could be used without unacceptable risk or that an imminent threat left them with no recourse but to initiate military action. 5. Currently, while the Soviets still wish to avoid serious risks of general war, they probably believe that the Bloc can in- crease its pressure on the West and can exploit local situations more vigorously, perhaps even through the use of Bloc armed force, without incurring the same degree of risk as they would have previ- ously. While we have always considered it possible that Bloc forces would be used in overt local aggression if this could be done without much risk of serious in- volvement with Western forces, we do not believe that the likelihood of such aggres- sion has increased. The Soviets may even believe that the West, also conscious of Soviet gains in military power, will be more and more disinclined to react vigor- ously. Consequently, they now seem dis- posed to test Western firmness and probe for weaknesses in the hope that some key position may be abandoned without seri- ous resistance, or that the Western alli- ance will split over some such issue. 6. In employing pressures against the West, the Soviet leadership doubtless in- tends to proceed with care. But its pre- occupation with calculations of power, SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 SECRET and its evident confidence in the strength of the Communist position, may lead it to underestimate dangers. We believe that if the current attitude of the Com- munist leaders persists, the danger of war arising from miscalculations will be in- creased. 7. The USSR has directed a major effort over the last several years toward under- developed countries. Its trade and aid programs, propaganda and cultural of- fensives are intended to displace Western influence, and to orient the policies of such states increasingly toward the Com- munist Bloc. The Soviet leaders believe that if they can associate the aspirations of underdeveloped peoples with their own cause they can increasingly constrict the political maneuverability of their main enemies, the Western Powers. We be- lieve that the Soviet leaders will continue to regard the effort to develop Communist influence in underdeveloped countries as a major facet of their policy. The USSR's targets among the underdeveloped coun- tries may shift considerably, in accord- ance with changing opportunities and local setbacks. In those countries where its efforts are most successful, the USSR may increasingly be tempted to support local communists in attempts to seize power. But the Soviets would carefully weigh such gains against the harmful consequences such a policy would inevit- ably evoke elsewhere. They will prob- ably generally maintain the pose of peace- ful cooperation. Since the claim to a "peace-loving" policy is one of the prin- cipal elements of the Soviet appeal to the neutralist states, the desire to sustain the plausibility of this claim will impose some restraint on the hard and uncom- promising tone of Soviet policy toward the West. 3 8. The major Soviet effort to extend influ- ence in underdeveloped areas has been made in the Middle East, where the West has important economic and strategic in- terests. The USSR will continue its pol- icy of economic and military aid to Arab states, hoping to deepen the conflict of Arab nationalism with the West. The initial aim of this policy is to displace Western and increase Soviet influence, and to make Western access to the re- sources of the area precarious. The So- viet leaders probably also contemplate the eventual achievement of a long- sought Russian goal?land access to the strategic areas of the Middle East. To this end, they will continue to encourage and support such movements as that for an independent pro-Soviet Kurdish state and for a pro-Communist government in Iraq, and will also continue pressures against Iran and Turkey. 9. The Soviets also hope that radical anti- Western nationalism in the Middle East can eventually be given a revolutionary turn toward Communism. While they probably intend for the present to support Nasser's claim to leadership of the Arab nationalist movement, they regard him as a "bourgeois nationalist" whose role is a transitory one. Given a favorable op- portunity in some Arab country, they may encourage local Communists to cap- ture the nationalist movement and at- tempt a seizure of power. An open con- flict between Soviet revolutionary policy and Nasser's claim to leadership of the Arab nationalist movement may occur during the period of this estimate. 10. In South Asia and the Far East, So- viet and Chinese Communist policy will probably continue to emphasize govern- mental contacts, supported by programs of economic aid and cultural exchange SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 ??? Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 4 and an active propaganda, with a view to encouraging neutralist policies and where possible openly anti-Western ones. Short of a favorable opportunity to establish Communist power in a key country, the Chinese and Soviets will probably con- tinue to put their main reliance on diplo- matic action intended to influence gov- ernments rather than to overthrow them, and if possible to associate them with the Bloc against the Western Powers. As regards Africa and Latin America, the Soviet Government apparently views with optimism its prospects for successful dip- lomatic and economic penetration and, in keeping with a current trend, can be expected to intensify its efforts in these areas. 11. Soviet policy in Europe appears to be aimed more at consolidating the USSR's position in Eastern Europe than at an early expansion of Soviet power beyond the frontiers of the bloc. Soviet policy toward Western Europe is concerned mainly with breaking up the NATO po- litical and military alliance and the de- fense structure located in that area. This is the main purpose of their maneuvers and proposals aimed at achieving "Euro- pean security." Apart from the ever- present aim of creating discord among the NATO allies, the more immediate So- viet objectives are to prevent an increase of West German military strength and to prevent the establishment of additional missile bases in Western Europe. 12. The current Soviet diplomatic offen- sive over the status of Berlin is the most striking example of Khrushchev's activist foreign policy. It appears designed to strengthen the East German regime as well as to stimulate a more receptive at- mosphere for other Soviet proposals on Germany and to create divisions among the NATO allies. The Soviet leaders prob- ably intend to be cautious and tactically flexible. We believe that they will try to direct Soviet and East German maneuver- ing in a manner which will avoid military conflict with the Western allies, while at the same time they will be prepared to take advantage of any signs of weakness on the part of the West, or of inclinations to compromise on major issues. Never- theless, they have already committed themselves considerably, and we believe that the crisis may be severe, with con- siderable chance of miscalculation by one or both sides. We do not believe that the Soviets intend to modify the main lines of their policy on the German prob- lem as a whole, but will continue to insist on maintaining the present division of Germany. They regard the preservation of Communist control in East Germany as essential to the maintenance of Com- munist power in Poland and Eastern Europe as a whole. They hope to con- solidate their control of that area and to force Western recognition of the legiti- macy and permanence of the Communist regimes there. 13. Soviet disarmament policy, which has at times shown some flexibility, is de- signed at a minimum to earn credit for the USSR as the leading proponent of "peace." Actual Soviet proposals are aimed mainly at the withdrawal of US military power from Western Europe and other bases, and also at discrediting and inhibiting US reliance on nuclear weap- ons. While it is possible that the USSR would accept some limitations on its own military posture in order to further these objectives, the Soviets would almost cer- tainly not consent to any very extensive scheme for mutually inspected disarma- ment. We believe that there is little like- TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET lihood that the Soviets will desire a broad disarmament agreement strongly enough to move their policy significantly in the direction of the positions now held by the Western Powers. Intra-Bloc Relations 14. In the last year a major effort has been undertaken to consolidate the unity of Bloc states. The conference of Commu- nist parties in November 1957 launched the so-called antirevisionist campaign in order to curb deviationist tendencies which threatened in 1956 to eliminate So- viet influence from Poland and Hungary. The latter regime is again effectively under Moscow's control and the Gomulka government in Poland, while still preserv- ing Party autonomy and some degree of independence in its internal policy, is showing itself more deferential to Soviet guidance. As compared with Stalin's methods, Moscow's authority in the Satel- lites will continue to be exercised dis- creetly out of deference to national sen- sitivities. In the very long run, we be- lieve there will be a tendency for direct Soviet control over these states to be di- luted. Popular dissatisfaction will remain widespread in Eastern Europe, but we believe that the recurrence of popular re- volt or of an attempt by a Satellite Com- munist Party to defy Moscow on vital issues is unlikely at least over the next few years. 15. The scale of China's power and the fact that the Chinese Communist Party has long been organizationally independ- ent of the USSR has made the Sino-Soviet relationship more nearly one of equality. The parallelism of material, strategic, and ideological interests will continue to weigh decisively in favor of cementing the alliance of the two countries, even though 5 frictions over a variety of questions?ideo- logical issues, economic and military sup- port by the USSR to China, competition for influence in other Communist par- ties?may from time to time make the relationship a sensitive and difficult one. We believe that Communist China will attain over the next several years an in- creasing influence on general Bloc policy and Communist ideology. However, so long as the struggle against the Western Powers remains the principal concern of both regimes, there is unlikely to be any serious split between them. Soviet Internal Political Situation 16. Khrushchev's leadership of the Soviet. regime does not seem likely to be seriously challenged so long as his health remains vigorous. In the absence of such a chal- lenge, or of any major setback to his poli- cies, he does not seem likely to attempt a return to the terroristic methods of dic- tatorship employed by Stalin. He ap- pears to recognize that the abandonment of such methods has improved the politi- cal climate within the country. Never- theless, the regime is now again empha- sizing its vigilance against dissenters, and would probably not hesitate to use more severely repressive measures if it judged this to be necessary. We believe that, even though the regime continues to ali- enate many, especially among intellectu- als and the youth, it has gained wider acceptance among the population gen- erally. This is due mainly to the relaxa- tion of police terror, to improvements in material standards, and to pride in the power, world position, scientific and eco- nomic achievements of the Soviet state. 17: We believe that, although there will be differences within the Soviet leader- ship over certain issues of policy, and dis- TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET contents within some groups of the popu- lation, the regime will seldom be con- strained in major foreign policy decisions by concern for internal political weak- nesses. Should Khrushchev die, there would probably again be a period of con- fused jockeying for the leadership. It is unlikely that this would basically affect the continuity of the regime's policies or its ability to carry them out, but such a period might diminish the authority of the Soviet Party within the Bloc and lead to divisions within and among Commu- nist Parties. Over the very long run, loss of belief in the ideological doctrine the regime imposes, and the increasing influ- ence of professional elements who are not ideologically inclined, may moderate the Soviet outlook. At present, however, we see no prospect of change on the Soviet domestic scene so fundamental as to diminish the motivation, will, or capacity of the regime to project its rapidly grow- ing power externally. Trends in the Soviet Economy 18. Soviet economic policy continues to aim primarily at a rapid expansion of the economic bases of national power. We believe that the goals laid down in the new Seven-Year Plan, which begins in 1959, are in the main feasible, except for those in agriculture, and that the USSR's gross national product (GNP) will grow at an average annual rate of about six percent during the plan period. Assum- ing that the US maintains an average rate of growth of about 3.5 percent per year, Soviet GNP in 1965 will be, in dollar terms, about half that of the US, as com- pared with about 40 percent at present. Despite the smaller size of its economy, the dollar value of the USSR's defense expenditure is about equal to that of the 6 US. Our estimates of the probable trend of military expenditures indicate that by 1963 these will be 45-50 percent greater than in 1957. Since growth of GNP in this period is estimated at 45 percent, the defense burden may thus be slightly heavier in 1963 than at present. Despite this, we estimate that Soviet industrial production will grow over the new plan period at an average annual rate of about nine percent, and that per capita con- sumption will be about one-third higher in 1965 than it was in 1957. 19. Beyond what they contribute to Soviet military power, the achievements of the Soviet economy have become a vitally im- portant element in the impact which So- viet policy has on the world situation. First is the direct politico-economic im- pact, arising from the ability of the USSR to initiate and support programs of eco- nomic aid or credit to foreign countries, to import goods from countries which would otherwise be hard-pressed to find markets, and to export various materials in quantities which (if the Soviet leaders so desired) could disrupt previously ex- isting patterns of world trade. In this connection, manipulation of prices is a key weapon of the USSR. Second is the political and psychological effect on un- derdeveloped countries of the successful and rapid economic development achieved by Soviet and Chinese methods. The So- viet and Chinese Communist leaders at- tach , great importance to the possibility of convincing these countries that only by adopting Communist methods and ac- cepting Communist assistance can they too achieve rapid economic growth. Third is the economic impact in a nar- rower sense, arising inevitably from the appearance in the world of a great new producing and trading unit, the influ- TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 7 ence of which could not fail to be great even if it were not deliberately used for political purposes by the Soviet leaders. In all three ways the Soviet economy will present a growing challenge to the West- ern world. Developments Affecting the Soviet Military Posture 20. The Soviets will almost certainly con- tinue to believe that they must have a large and diversified military establish- ment, designed to meet contingencies up to and including general war. Thus they will at all times maintain substantial forces-in-being. Meanwhile, they will press ahead with research and develop- ment programs in order to acquire addi- tional capabilities with advanced weapon systems, and if possible to achieve clear military superiority over the US. 21. The present Soviet nuclear weapons stockpile could include weapons in a range of yields from about 2 KT to about 8 MT. The USSR probably possesses suf- ficient nuclear weapons to support a major attack by its long-range striking forces, but the supply of fissionable mate- rials is probably insufficient for large- scale allocation of such weapons to air defense and tactical uses as well. Since we estimate a substantial and high pri- ority Soviet program for the expansion of fissionable material production and considerable further improvement in nu- clear weapons technology, we believe that current limitations will ease during 1959-1963. 22. The principal Soviet military compo- nent presently capable of long-range nu- clear attack is Long Range Aviation, with about 1,450 bombers (including some con- vertible tanker-bombers), among which are about 950 jet medium bombers and about 100 to 125 jet and turboprop heavy bombers. This force?best suited for attacking targets in Eurasia and its pe- riphery?is capable of large-scale attacks against the US only through the exten- sive use of medium bombers on one-way missions. While the size of the long- range bomber force will probably decline gradually, Soviet long-range striking capabilities will increase markedly as the stockpile of nuclear weapons grows, im- proved bombers are introduced, the readi- ness and proficiency of the bomber force increases, and especially as the Soviet capacity to deliver nuclear weapons by missiles expands.' 23. The USSR will rely increasingly upon missiles as nuclear delivery systems during 1959-1963. Present operational weapons include ground-launched ballis- tic missiles with ranges up to 700 and probably 1,100 nautical miles (n.m.), as well as bomber-launched air-to-surface missiles suitable for use against ships and The Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence, Department of the Army, does not concur in the last sentence of this paragraph. He agrees that Soviet long-range striking capabilities will increase markedly but believes that this increase cannot be attributed to the introduction of im- proved bombers of the types and within the strength levels estimated, or to continued train- ing of bomber crews. In his view, the estimated acquisition by the USSR of a substantial ICBM capability, along with the anticipated increase in the Soviet nuclear weapons stockpile, are factors which far outweigh comparatively routine improvements in the existing force. Therefore, he believes that the last sentence of this para- graph should read as follows: "The Soviets can be expected to introduce improved bombers and to increase the readiness and proficiency of Long Range Aviation units, but the size of this force and its significance in a long-range attack role will gradually decline during the period. None- theless, Soviet long-range striking capabilities will increase markedly as the Soviet missile delivery capability expands and as the stockpile of nuclear weapons grows." TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET certain other targets. A few conven- tional submarines have probably been converted to employ 200 n.m. cruise- type missiles. The USSR will probably achieve a first operational capability with 10 prototype ICBMs of 5,500 n.m. range at some time during 1959. While it is possible that a limited capability with comparatively unproven ICBMs might have been established in 1958, we believe this to be unlikely. We believe that So- viet planners intend to acquire a sizeable ICBM capability as soon as practicable. 24. Air defense capabilities will increase through improvements in the perform- ance characteristics of weapons and equipment, a higher proportion of all- weather fighters, further incorporation of guided missiles in the defenses of numer- ous targets, and especially through wide employment of semiautomatic air de- fense control. But the Soviets will con- tinue to have difficulty in opposing very low altitude attack, the air defense sys- tem will still be subject to disruption and saturation, and the problem of warning time will become more critical. The USSR will probably not have a weapon system with even limited effectiveness against ballistic missiles until 1963 or later. 25. The ground forces, estimated to have 67 mechanized or motorized rifle divi- sions, 75 rifle divisions, 23 tank divisions, and 10 airborne divisions, have been ex- tensively modernized and reorganized, in accordance with revised Soviet tactical doctrine which supplements standard tactics and training with those designed for conditions of nuclear warfare. These forces are closely supported by tactical aviation consisting of fighters trained in the ground attack role (in addition to their air defense role) and light and medium bombers trained in ground sup- port bombing techniques. With appro- priate air and naval support, Soviet ground forces are capable of conducting large-scale operations on several fronts into peripheral areas, separately or con- currently. The increasing availability of nuclear weapons and guided missiles dur- ing 1959-1963 will bring further evolu- tionary changes, but probably no major alterations in size or deployment of forces. Tactical and naval air units, some of which have already received jet medium bombers, will probably receive new super- sonic fighters and bombers. Increasing attention is being paid to the develop- ment of airborne forces and air transport capabilities. 26. The present Soviet force of about 440 submarines includes about 260 long-range craft of postwar design and construction. A recent slowdown in construction prob- ably reflects a shift to new types, includ- ing nuclear-powered submarines and sub- marines designed specifically to employ guided missiles. A submarine-launched ballistic missile system with a missile range of about 1,000 n.m,. will probably be available for first operational use in 1961-1963. Construction of conventional submarines will probably continue, but the greater complexity of nuclear-pow- ered and missile submarines will prob- ably result in a total annual production rate considerably below the high levels of recent years. 27. Space Programs. We believe that the USSR is presently capable of orbiting earth satellites weighing on the order of 5,000 pounds, of launching lunar probes and satellites, and of launching plane- tary probes to Mars and Venus. Its space program could also include: surveillance satellites and recoverable aeromedical TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 9 satellites (1958-1959) ; "soft landings" by lunar rockets and recoverable manned earth satellites (1959-1960) ; a manned glide-type high altitude research vehicle (1960-1961) ; earth satellites weighing as much as 25,000 pounds and manned cir- cumlunar flights (1961-1962). While each of these individual achievements appears feasible as to technical capability and earliest date attainable, we doubt that the USSR could accomplish all of these space flight activities within the time periods specified. If the Soviets desire to do so, an earth satellite could be launched from the territory of Com- munist China within the next year or so. Soviet Scientific Achievements 28. The USSR's achievements during the last year, including earth satellite launch- ings, weapons development, and the scale of its efforts in the IGY program, have strikingly demonstrated that the USSR has acquired a scientific establishment of the first rank. As a result of a sustained effort over the last three decades, the number of graduates in scientific and technical disciplines has steadily in- creased, research facilities have been greatly expanded, and the quality of So- viet scientific training has improved. Soviet scientists have made marked prog- ress in many areas of fundamental and applied research and in some fields rank among the best in the world. We believe that significant Soviet advances in science and technology are likely to occur in the future with greater frequency than in the past. TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 10 DISCUSSION I. INTERNAL POLITICAL DEVELOPMENTS Ascendancy of Khrushchev 29. Khrushchev's position as the dominat- ing figure on the Soviet scene appears to be well established. There does not appear to be .any other leader or any group able or willing seriously to challenge his position. The Twenty-First Party Congress, scheduled for January 1959, may install still more of his followers in the highest Party organs and further dramatize his personal and ideological authority. Thus, it is likely to be Khru- shchev who will preside over the Soviet re- gime throughout the period of this estimate, assuming that he retains his health and vigor. However, Khrushchev's policies will probably continue to arouse concern among certain elements of the Party, and an attempt to reduce his authority cannot be entirely ex- cluded. 30. Although he is in a sense Stalin's heir, Khrushchev will almost certainly not rule as Stalin ruled. The style of his leadership is characteristic of his own personality, and is reflected in a suitable myth: the new leader is a gregarious man of the people, and re- mains "close to the masses;" he is a rough and practical-minded man, but his political judgment is unerring, and like Lenin he com- mands the Party by the persuasive force of his arguments rather than by the fear he in- spires. This image probably reflects the man- ner in which Khrushchev prefers to rule; he fancies himself as the popular boss-persuader. His method of leadership is also consistent with the needs of the post-Stalin period. Con- sequently, he will be disposed to avoid the use of terror as a main instrument of rule, though the police will be kept strong and employed as necessary. Errors in judgment, even oppo- sition on some issues, will not generally be treated as political crimes. The Central Com- mittee and Party Congresses will probably continue to meet regularly. There will be greater representation of outlying regions at the center, and more concern displayed for local interests. Iii short, the consolidation of Khrushchev's power will probably not mean a return to dictatorship of the Stalinist type. 31. Moreover, there will continue to be pres- sures on Khrushchev which will work to limit his exercise of dictatorial power. Since his authority, unlike Stalin's, does not rest on the use of terror, Khrushchev must to a far greater degree seek to win and hold the sup- port of groups within the Party apparatus. Inner Party maneuverings are complicated by the fact that greater account must be taken of popular sentiment than was true under Stalin; Khrushchev's position in particular is exposed because he is identified with economic and social programs which have stimulated popular desires for further material improve- ment and he is thus personally accountable for maintaining a good record of performance in relation to promises. At some point within the period of this estimate Khrushchev may face the dilemma either of tolerating radically opposing views within the leadership, thus imperiling his control, or of attempting to suppress opposition tendencies, at the cost of a return to terror. If, although we think it unlikely, a serious challenge to Khrushchev's personal position should arise, not all of the allies and associates who supported him dur- ing his rise to power would necessarily remain loyal to him. 32. The ebullient personality of Khrushchev has been considered by some observers as likely to give Soviet foreign and domestic policy an erratic and unstable course. We think this is unlikely. His public manner is probably in large part that of the conscious actor-politician, intended to confound his op- ponents and to impart vigor to the execution of his policies. His advocacy of certain unex- pected departures in Soviet policies in recent years was probably not unrelated to efforts to steal a march on his competitors in the sue- TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 ? Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 11 cession struggle. We think that the sub- stance, as distinguished from the style, of So- viet policy is likely to be little affected by Khrushchev's idiosyncracies. Role of the Party 33. The victory of Khrushchev has been paral- leled by an increasing use of the Party ap- paratus in all aspects of control and adminis- tration. At the top, in the Party Presidium, the majority now consists of Khrushchev's followers who were elevated from the Secre- tariat and of important regional Party secre- taries; the former overwhelming representa- tion of men in leading government positions has been drastically reduced.3 Party person- alities either preside over or play important roles in the regional economic councils which now administer the economy in place of the former central ministries. Local Party secre- taries have also been brought into the district military councils, giving the Party a closer hold on military administration. In rural areas measures have been taken to give the local Party more effective control over agri- culture. 34. This increased role of the Party at all levels of administration was probably intended in part to insure Khrushchev's firm control over the country, since the Party apparatus was his principal instrument of power. But the reforms in industry and agriculture which he has sponsored in recent years ? all involving decentralization and a fuller reliance on local initiative ? have also made closer Party su- pervision more necessary in order to combat local violations of the Party's economic direc- tives. Under Khrushchev much more will de- pend on morale and discipline within the Party at local levels than has been the case in the past. 'At present, 11 of the 14 full members of the Party's Presidium hold key posts in the Party apparatus (including 9 of the 10 secretaries) , and only 3 other than Khrushchev himself hold leading governmental positions. By contrast, at the time of Malenkov's removal in 1955, of the 9 full members of the Presidium 8 were in leading governmental positions, and only Khrushchev was a full time official in the Party apparatus. 35. The increase in authority of the Party apparatus has taken place at the expense of the various interest groupings which compete for place and influence behind the fa?e of totalitarian Party unity. The professional military opposes the system of political com- missars and, despite Zhukov's removal for at- tempting to reduce Party control over the armed forces, this attitude will persist. Gov- ernment administrators and economic man- agers will continue to resent what they regard as the bumbling interference of Party hacks in their technical spheres. Intellec- tuals ? writers, artists, scientists, students ? will continue to press for a greater area of freedom and a loosening of the Party's ideo- logical strait-jacket. While each of these groups has a stake in the success and pros- perity of the Soviet state, each has also pro- fessional interests to further. One purpose of Khrushchev in elevating the Party appa- ratus is to prevent the hardening of these professional interests into self-contained, au- tonomous groups which might ultimately have independent political importance. 36. It has been suggested by some Western observers that, as the Soviet economy matures and becomes more complex, as the needs of society come to be met by more specialized administrative skills, as education is extended and diversified, the totalitarian character of the regime will be diluted. The dictator or the Party as the single focus of power, it has been argued, will give way to autonomy in areas of less immediate political significance. Even in the political field, institutional ar- rangements will have to be found for repre- senting many diverse interest groups: it was possible to see signs of such a tendency in the post-Stalin period of confusion occasioned by the succession struggle. On occasion, the Central Committee of the Party became an arena of political decision with factional and policy differences represented within it. In the post-Stalin period the rulers have also seemed to think it necessary to take account of public opinion generally in framing their policies. Such tendencies to dilute arbitrary power and to broaden participation in policy- TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 12 making beyond the narrow circle of the Party Presidium may reappear at the time of Khru- shchev's death or at some other period of weakened authority. For the present, how- ever, Khrushchev's restoration of one-man leadership, and his manner of achieving it through the Party apparatus, has maintained Soviet society firmly in the totalitarian mold. Issues in Soviet Politics 37. This development does not mean that there will not continue to be group pressures and much pulling and hauling over issues of policy. Even under one-man leadership the normal play of politics is not adjourned, though it may become less visible. There are a number of issues over which lines are likely to be drawn behind the fa?e of unity. For example, whatever the degree of its practical success, the economic reorganization scheme is laden with political significance. It calls for the removal of a host of bureaucrats from Moscow to the provinces, a fate little relished by the migrants. The reorganization could lead to a regionalism which would be a new source of tension, although the revitalized Party must, in Khrushchev's calculation, serve as the cement which binds the periphery to the center. This reorganization, like the ideologically controversial measures Khru- shchev has sponsored in agriculture, has yet to be fully proved in practice. Khrushchev may yet be driven to some agile maneuvering to defend his innovations. 38. Also among the issues likely to affect in- ner Party politics are those related to Soviet economic growth. The growth achieved may not be high enough to attain all the goals ? high rates of investment, increase in agricultural output, rising living standards, modern armaments ? which now have prior- ity in Party programs. Cutting back on any of these objectives could lead to dispute. The leaders of the armed forces, for example, would not willingly accept either a substan- tial cut in the military budget or reduced in- vestment for industries of military signifi- cance. The Party apparatus itself, influenced by the lower ranks where there is direct con- tact with popular pressures, would be re- luctant to sacrifice prospective gains in living standards. Failure to achieve satisfactory rates of growth could produce resistance to further outlays in foreign aid or bring into question Khrushchev's economic reorganiza- tion. 39. There are likewise some purely political issues which may have divisive effects. The Soviet ruling groups would be reluctant to see a return to the systematic use of terror. The question of the control of the secret police is of widespread concern and would become paramount in case Khrushchev's mastery were ever placed in doubt. There must be some in positions of influence who are con- cerned with what seems to them the down- grading of Soviet authority in the Bloc, as represented by toleration of the Gomulka re- gime in Poland and the increasing weight of China in ideological and policy matters. There may be others who question Khru- shchev's policy of alliance with "national lib- eration movements" in underdeveloped areas on the ground that such a policy increases the danger of war arising from clashes with Western interests, and involves support of bourgeois movements which cannot be used to promote Communism. 40. Khrushchev's late arrival at supreme power (he is now 64) will make the prospect of a new succession struggle a lively, if seldom discussed, factor in inner Party maneuverings. As he grows older it will be difficult to sep- arate policy issues like those discussed above from the succession question. Thus major tensions will probably continue to be present within the Soviet body politic despite the stabilization of power at the top, and these will from time to time affect the face which Soviet policy presents to the outside world. Attitudes in Soviet Society 41. The post-Stalin leadership set out to ef- fect a basic improvement in the attitude of the Soviet people toward the regime. The re- laxation of police terror and the greater at- tention to living standards served this end. The greatest material gains so far have been made by the peasantry, but a continuing im- provement of urban standards over the next TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 13 few years, particularly in housing, is also promised. In terms of its standing with the population as a whole, the regime is probably stronger now than it was five years ago. We believe that the measures which have pro- duced this improvement will be continued. 42. Soviet society continues nevertheless to be marked by substantial areas of discontent. There exists, and will probably continue to exist, considerable disaffection among in- tellectuals, particularly among Soviet writers and university students. It is significant be- cause it touches a highly vulnerable area, the regime's ideological authority. Intellectuals are aware of the discrepancies between the Marxist-Leninist ideal and Soviet reality and they also resent the regime's encroachments on private life and professional interests. They doubt that adequate safeguards exist to prevent the repetition of Stalinist terror. They feel contempt for Party careerists. They resent restrictions on travel abroad, and limi- tations on access to Western publications and broadcasts. These discontents do not take the form of active opposition but are limited for the most part to a retreat into an inner world so as to minimize the degree of involve- ment with the Party and the state. 43. There continues also to be dissidence among some national minorities. The peo- ples of the old Baltic states harbor vigorous Russophobe feelings. They feel strongly that they are exploited and that their homelands lag far behind their prewar cultural and liv- ing standards. A considerable residue of anti- Russian sentiment is also to be found in the western Ukraine, as well as in Georgia, where the downgrading of Stalin and the loss of its former privileged status also rankle. It seems probable, furthermore, that many of the two million Jews in the Soviet Union would like to emigrate. Because many Jews hold key pro- fessional positions and have connections abroad, the regime probably regards them as a continuing security problem. 44. We do not believe that any of the discon- tents and tensions described above are likely to have major political significance during the period of this estimate, although they will place restrictions on the regime's ability to mobilize the population for its own purposes. The regime will deal with them by its well- practiced methods of concession and suppres- sion. Moreover, its success in identifying with itself the sense of national pride and power, extending even to chauvinism, is a formidable asset with which to counter dis- content. The Soviet people are well aware that under Communist rule Russia has been transformed from a backward, agrarian, de- feated nation into the world's second most powerful state, perhaps, they would like to believe, the most powerful. The Russian tra- dition takes it for granted that government is by nature tyrannical, arbitrary, and exact- ing. If it fulfills the aspiration to national power, it can be forgiven much. The Longer View 45. Have the processes of change which have operated so broadly and visibly in Soviet so- ciety since the death of Stalin opened up per- spectives for more fundamental change in the long run? It seems undeniable that such a possibility exists. One source of such change could be a failure by the totalitarian Party repeatedly to renew its vitality; this might result in a dilution of its monopoly of power in favor of other interest groups upon which the functioning of the society will increas- ingly depend as its industrialization proceeds. Another could be inability of the Party to maintain its intellectual and ideological au- thority as awareness of the gap between real- ity and ideology increases, a process which will be accelerated as contacts with the West are extended. We consider that the effect of factors like these cannot now be reckoned to have any assured outcome. At present, we see no prospect of change on the Soviet domestic scene so fundamental as to diminish the motivation, will, or capacity of the regime to project its rapidly growing power externally. TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 14 II. TRENDS IN THE SOVIET ECONOMY General 46. The performance of the Soviet economy has become a vitally important element in the impact which Soviet policy has on the world situation. This importance derives from an extraordinary record of growth over the last decade, a growth which is certain to continue at a rate faster than that of the US economy. The strength of the Soviet econ- omy has provided a foundation of great na- tional power for Soviet policy, first and fore- most military power: the USSR has had available the means to maintain military pro- grams and to develop advanced weapons on a scale which no other state except the US can undertake. 47. However, apart from its function as a basis for Soviet military power, there are three other ways in which the impact of the Soviet economy on the world situation is already observable to a greater or lesser degree, and is certain to increase. First is the direct politico-economic impact, arising from the ability of the USSR to initiate and support programs of economic aid or credit to foreign countries, to import goods from countries which would otherwise be hard-pressed to find markets, and to export various materials in quantities which (if the Soviet? leaders so desired) could disrupt previously existing patterns of world trade. In this connection, manipulation of prices is a key weapon of the USSR. Second is the political and psycho- logical effect on underdeveloped countries, achieved through the exhibition of success- ful and rapid economic development by Com- munist methods, and through the encourage- ment of such countries to do likewise under Soviet advice ? the Soviet leaders attach great importance to this aspect. Third is the eco- nomic impact in a narrower sense, arising inevitably from the appearance in the world of a great new producing and trading unit, the influence of which could not fail to be great even if it were not deliberately used for political purposes by the Soviet leaders. In all three ways the Soviet economy will present a growing challenge to the Western world. Shifts in Economic Policy 48. Soviet economic policy continues to be marked by a spirit of innovation and experi- mentation. With the announcement early in 1958 of the program to abolish the Machine Tractor Stations, the present leadership added another to the series of major measures of change it has undertaken in recent years. Most of the steps taken, in particular the reor- ganization scheme of 1957 involving the dis- solution of central ministries and their re- placement by 104 regional economic councils, have figured as issues in the political struggle for Stalin's succession. Ichrushchev's rise to power was probably due at least in part to his initiative in sponsoring novel measures to cope with the problems of economic policy with which the regime found itself confronted at Stalin's death. 49. These problems arose in part because of the great growth and increasing complexity of the Soviet economic system and the failure of the Soviet leadership to adapt its planning and control mechanisms to these develop- ments. Difficulties were aggravated during Stalin's later years by his unwillingness to countenance any departures from the pattern of economic policy laid down during the early Five-Year Plans. Concentration on heavy in- dustry led to imbalances in the economy; agriculture and housing were denied invest- ment and generally neglected. When the So- viet leaders turned to reforming measures after 1953, the problems which immediately confronted them included the increased com- plexity of planning and administration as in- dustrial output became more varied and spe- cialized, the need to employ labor and ma- terial resources more efficiently as these came to be more fully utilized, higher investment requirements to maintain gains in output, and the necessity to provide greater material incentives in order to improve labor discipline and obtain higher labor productivity. TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 15 50. The attack on these problems has involved a variety of measures over the last five years. First, there was a change in the political at- mosphere ? the easing of police terror and penalties for economic dereliction. The in- tention was to improve the conditions for managerial initiative in enterprises and to aid the campaign for faster growth of labor productivity. Second, changes in investment priorities were made in order to alleviate the desperate situation in housing, to lift agricul- tural output out of its stagnation, and to overcome the failure of basic materials output to keep pace with the requirements of fabri- cating industry. These changes also reflected the regime's desire to improve living condi- tions, in the expectation that political and economic benefits would flow from improved attitudes on the part of the Soviet population. Finally, in 1957-1958, the regime undertook a sweeping reform of economic administration in an effort to overcome the impediments which bureaucracy had come to put in the way of efficient operation of the economy. 51. The economic reorganization scheme has been described as a decentralization plan, but it was this in only a limited sense. There never was any intention to weaken the basic apparatus of centralized planning or to give up the political determination of economic priorities in favor of decision-making at lower levels according to economic criteria alone. The plan aimed at eliminating the top-heavy vertical administration of the Moscow indus- trial ministries. It was hoped that this would result in a more efficient response to central plan directives. The theory was that, by al- lowing a greater degree of local initiative and by placing the administrators in the regions close to the enterprises they were supervising, the implementing of decisions would be more realistic and less wasteful. 52. The results obtained thus far probably have included some gains of the kind antici- pated ? better use of local resources, fuller use of transportation facilities, less delay on routine decisions. But the new system con- tains dangers of its own, which have been heavily attacked in the Soviet press under the name of "localism." To the extent that freedom to dispose of resources locally has been allowed it has been difficult to prevent decisions from being taken in local rather than national interests. There evidently has been a tendency, aside from some cases of outright corruption, for the local authorities to divert resources to plans of their own for the greater development of their regions, sometimes to the neglect of centrally imposed plans and priorities. The chronic problem of obtaining conformity to economic goals im- posed by political fiat from the center, with little regard for local desires or the economic criteria which appeal to the managers of enterprises, seems to persist. We believe, therefore, that the regime will continue to experiment with new techniques of economic planning and administration. 53. The Soviet leadership under Khrushchev seems confident nevertheless that it has al- ready overcome the difficulties which emerged in 1956 when cumulative mistakes in planning caused shortages in basic materials and forced abandonment of the Sixth Five-Year Plan. The regime has announced a new Seven-Year Plan which again sets ambitious goals. It reaffirms the traditional emphases upon the rapid growth of heavy industry, and upon maintaining large military programs. But the Plan also provides for other key pro- grams to which the regime has committed itself in recent years. The Soviet leaders in- tend to go forward with increasing living standards. Programs of lesser cost will in- clude maintaining Soviet power in Eastern Europe by supporting the Satellite economies as needed, assisting the industrialization of Communist China, and backing up Soviet political objectives in underdeveloped coun- tries with trade and aid programs. The main question affecting Soviet economic policy over the next five years is whether these multiple priorities, all of which bear on the competitive struggle with the West in which the Soviet leaders see themselves involved, can be met simultaneously. On the whole, we believe that the Seven-Year Plan production goals are feasible, except in agriculture, but that their achievement will impose considerable strains on the economy, and that some programs may have to be modified as the plan period pro- ceeds. TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 16 Prospects for Economic Growth 54. The Soviet economy will grow less rapidly during the next seven years than it did during the last seven. Soviet gross national product (GNP) increased at an average annual rate close to 7 percent from 1950 to 1955, and at about 6.5 percent from 1955 to 1957. This slight slackening in the rate of growth ob- scures a decline in the growth of industrial production from an annual rate of about 11 percent to about 9 percent, and a nearly offsetting acceleration in the growth of agri- culture. Because of favorable weather and a large agricultural output the rate of growth of GNP in 1958 has apparently again risen somewhat. Over the period 1958-1965 we be- lieve that GNP will probably grow at an aver- age annual rate of about 6 percent. At this figure, assuming that the US achieves an average annual rate of 3.5 percent, 4 Soviet GNP in 1965 will be, in dollar terms, about half that of the US, as compared with about 40 percent of US GNP at present. ' This projected rate of the US is approximately midway between the postwar rate and the long run trend. 55. As Soviet GNP continues to gain in size relative to US GNP, the differences between Soviet and US use of national product will continue to be marked. With a GNP only about two-fifths the size of US GNP, the dol- lar value of Soviet defense expenditure is approximately equal to that of the US.5 So- viet investment, in dollar values currently around two-thirds as great as US investment, will grow more rapidly than Soviet GNP dur- ing the next seven years, and will approach still closer the absolute size of US investment. Investment in industry alone was about 90 percent of US investment in industry (manu- facturing, mining, and utilities) in 1957. The dollar value of Soviet total consumption is less than one-third that of the US. Soviet consumption, on the other hand, will increase at a slower rate than total GNP during the 1958-1965 period, thus becoming a smaller share of the latter. (See graph below.) The dollar value referred to here was derived by valuing manpower at appropriate US pay rates and other items of military significance at comparable US costs. SOVIET COVISUMPTION, II11ESTMEHT, AND DEFENSE AS A PEEICENTAGE OF US, 1957 (Measured is Comparable Prices) 100 100 100 98 67 32 - US USSR US USSR US USSR CONSUMPTION INVESTMENT DEFENSE TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 56. The slightly reduced pace of Soviet eco- nomic growth anticipated in this estimate re- flects increasing difficulties in obtaining labor, material, and machinery. The economy may be better able to cope with such difficulties as a result of recent changes in the planning, organization, and implementation of economic activity, but the benefits from these changes will be offset by other factors. Agriculture will tend to grow more slowly following the period of sharp output gains of 1954-1958. Industrial growth will be affected by rising investment requirements per unit of addi- tional output and by continuing difficulties in supplying adequate quantities of key material inputs, especially ferrous metals. In addition, there will be a reduced rate of growth of the labor force, owing to the growing impact of the decline in the birth rate during World War II, at a time when the introduction of a shorter work week in industry may in- crease the need for new industrial workers. Trends in Defense Expenditures' 57. Our estimates of the probable trend of military expenditures through 1963 indicate a defense allocation in that year approxi- mately 45-50 percent greater than the 1957 level. Achievement of the estimated 45 per- cent growth in Soviet GNP would mean that the defense burden, taken in the aggregate, would be slightly heavier in 1963 than at present, though still not as heavy as in the years immediately prior to 1957. Defense requirements will impose burdensome claims upon various types of resources needed for in- vestment and economic growth. 58. Most of the increase in defense expendi- tures will result from increasing allocations to more costly aircraft, to guided missiles, mili- tary research and development, and nuclear weapons. These programs together probably account for about one-third of total expendi- tures at present. By 1963 they are expected to require about twice as much in resources as at present and to account for about 45 percent of total defense programs. Estimates of Soviet defense expenditures are subject to a wider margin of error than other statistical estimates in this section and should therefore be used with greater caution. 17 59. Soviet defense expenditures in recent years, when converted into dollar values, ap- pear to be of roughly the same magnitude as US defense expenditures. As stated above, the USSR, with a much smaller GNP than the US, produces military goods and services with a dollar value roughly the same. It is able to do this primarily because in the USSR mili- tary end-items are less expensive, relative to consumption items, than they are in the US, and because the average level of real pay and subsistence provided Soviet military person- nel is much lower than in the US. Industrial Prospects 60. The eventual aim of overtaking US indus- try in per capita production continues to dominate Soviet planning for industry. Shifts in the allocation of resources during the period 1953-1955 in support of the economic innovations of the post-Stalin regime ? first Malenkov's broad consumer goods program and then Khrushchev's agricultural con- sumer goods and housing programs ? con- tributed to a moderate decrease in the rate of growth of heavy industry. Heavy industry was expected to benefit, however, from a new program of automation and re-equipment and from changes in industrial management, planning and control, introduced during this period. But by 1956 the failure to provide sufficient new capacity in the raw materials industries caused a severe shortage of indus- trial raw materials, particularly steel, coal, and cement. 61. The leadership's response to this situa- tion during the last two years has been to abandon the Sixth Five-Year Plan, cut back industrial output goals for 1957 and subse- quently for 1958, and to order the formulation of a new Seven-Year Plan for the period 1959- 1965. It also launched a remedial investment program which was to increase capacity in raw materials industries while still maintain- ing ambitious programs in agriculture and housing. The reorganization plan of July 1957, as already indicated, was also intended to insure a better utilization of materials by permitting greater leeway for local decisions. TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 18 62. Industrial growth was claimed by the So- viets to be 10 percent for 1957 and for the first three quarters of 1958, and while this claim was probably somewhat overstated, it indicates that the reduced goals of 7.0 and 7.5 percent for these years were set too low. These rates of increase, however, obscure the continuing poor performance of some basic industries, particularly ferrous metallurgy. Moreover, in spite of the remedial investment program, additions to production capacity in these industries continued to fall short of planned goals in 1957, and probably in 1958 also. Production goals for 1965 in the basic materials industries indicate that they must continue to receive priority treatment if planned rates of increases are to be achieved. Substantial overfulfillment of presently planned goals in these industries, although not likely to occur, would be necessary to ap- proach the 11 percent annual increases in industrial production which we believe were achieved during the Fifth Five-Year Plan (1951-1955). However, we believe that the 8.7 percent average annual rate of growth given in the present version of the New Seven- Year Plan is feasible. (See table below for a list of some Soviet industrial output goals.) 63. One of the factors affecting future indus- trial growth will be the impact of raw ma- terial constraints on the machinery and metal fabricating sector. Despite the current effort being directed into raw materials it is ex- pected that the rate of growth of metals will fall from the 10.5 percent annual average of the past seven years to about 8 or 9 percent per year for the period 1958-1965. This slower growth of metals output will have a restrain- ing effect on the growth of the machinery and metal fabricating sector. Even so, the Seven- Year Plan targets in many of the metals in- dustries are impressive even in terms of past Soviet accomplishments. The announced 1965 goal for steel, stated as 86 to 91 million tons, suggests uncertainty as to what can be achieved in this industry. Even the lower figure represents an increase of 31 million tons over the present level of output, as com- pared with a gain of 24 million tons in 1951- 1958. SOVIET INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION 1957-1965 Product Unit I US-USSR Outputs in 1957 USSR 1965 Goals US USSR USSR as Percent of US Electric Power Billion KWH 754 210 28 500-520 Crude Oil Million Tons 354 98 28 230-240 Coal Million Tons 469 463 99 596-609 Crude Steel Million Tons 102 51 50 86-91 Primary Copper Thousand Tons 1,319 440 33 946 Primary Aluminum Thousand Tons 1,500 550 37 1,830 Cement Million Tons 50 29 58 75-81 Machine Tools Thousand Units 62 130 210 140-200 Generators for Steam Sz Hydraulic Turbines Million KW 10.8 5.6 52 17.5-18.4 Commercial Vehicles Thousand Units 1,100 382 35 750-856 Sulfuric Acid Thousand Tons (100%) 14,700 4,569 31 10,176 Cotton Fabrics Million Meters 8,748 5,600 64 7,700-8,000 Leather Footwear Million Pairs 594 315 53 515 Washing Machines Thousand Units 3,589 377 10 4,048 1 All tonnage figures in metric tons. Except for primary aluminum and copper, which are estimated, the production official Soviet announcements and are accepted as valid. Includes automobiles. ' Since no official goal has been published, this figure represents our estimate. TOP SECRET data are based on Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 19 64. The slower natural increase of the labor force during the period of this estimate may also be a limiting factor on the rate of Soviet industrial growth. Population increase and a continuation of past school programs would provide an estimated increase of only about seven million men in the total civilian labor force over the next seven years. The Seven- Year Plan requires an increase of about 11 million men in the nonagricultural labor force. Moreover, the regime is heavily committed to reduce hours of work and has reaffirmed such an intention in its Seven-Year Plan announce- ment. The goals for gains in productivity reflect the regime's recognition that the labor supply is now a limitation on the rate of eco- nomic expansion. One of the aims of current programs in agriculture is clearly to increase productivity in this area so as to permit the release of workers to industry. Moreover, re- cent and prospective changes in the educa- tional system are in part designed to free additional young people for employment in industry; these changes might release as many as one million to the nonagricultural labor force over the seven-year period. Agricultural Prospects 65. In the years 1954-1958 agriculture ? which had remained largely stagnant during Stalin's last years ? underwent rapid devel- opment. This was due both to the programs for cultivating the new lands and planting corn, and to other less spectacular but no less important measures such as increased farm supplies and greater financial incentives. In the new lands the weather was better than average. No slackening of attention is ap- parent in the Seven-Year Plan and the rela- tively high levels of agricultural investments of the last several years are scheduled to con- tinue. However, the growth rate gains in agricultural output of recent years cannot be maintained. Total acreage is expected to in- crease during the next seven years at a rate only about one-fourth of the earlier period. Most of the future increase will have to come from increased production per unit of land. This is more difficult to achieve, particularly since the unfavorable effect of indiscriminate acreage expansion will manifest itself. Never- theless, the existing potential is by no means exhausted, and a number of measures such as soil improvement will be undertaken. 66. Recent organizational changes and better prices in agriculture probably have softened the critical attitude of the peasant toward the regime, as have other earlier measures which were focused upon tax, product procurement, and income conditions in agriculture. State control over agricultural activity, however, has not been weakened. The central organs continue to determine state procurement goals even though the enterprise manager in Soviet agriculture is likely to exercise more choice over what and how he will produce. Collective farm control over most of the ma- chinery formerly under the MTS may also prove of some significance in increasing out- put by eliminating conflict between the col- lective farm chairman and the MTS director concerning day-to-day operations of the col- lective farm. Proposals have also been ad- vanced recently to introduce more rigorous cost accountability on the collective farms. If carried out, these procedures, taken in con- junction with the gradual introduction of a guaranteed cash wage, will increase the effi- ciency of collective farm operations, and per- haps permit the release of farm workers to industry. Moreover, the improvement in peasant attitudes brought about by the aboli- tion of the MTS and the effect of 1958 reforms in raising the income of the poorer collective farms will probably have a positive effect on peasant work habits. 67. The Seven-Year Plan carries an unreal- istic goal of a 70 percent increase in agricul- ture. We believe that the actual increase will be less than half of this. Dissatisfaction with the progress of agriculture is likely to lead the regime to continue its experimenting in the agricultural field. Trends in Consumption 68. The Soviet consumer will not enjoy as rapid an increase in over-all consumption during the next seven years as he did during the last seven, when per capita consumption increased by approximately 40 percent. This will be true despite recently announced pro- TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET grams to provide more meat, milk, housing, furniture, and clothing. But per capita con- sumption is still likely to be as much as one- third higher in 1965 than it was in 1957, with some qualitative improvement in consumer goods. However, except probably in milk pro- duction, the USSR will not succeed in its an- nounced effort to match US per capita con- sumption of meat and other selected food products in the time periods set. Even if it is able to do so eventually, other areas of con- sumption, such as consumer durable goods and housing, will continue to lag far behind US levels. 69. The increase in the level of consumption anticipated in this estimate should be ade- quate to keep the population reasonably well satisfied with the regime's efforts to provide higher living standards. The regime will con- tinue to exploit the propaganda value of ris- ing consumption levels. The dollar value of Soviet total consumption is less than one- third that of US consumption, and on a per capita basis only about one-fourth that of the US. The Soviet consumer occupies only about one-fifth the housing space enjoyed by the US consumer. Khrushchev's much pub- licized housing program will continue to re- ceive a rising share of investment for the next two years and then may level off at a volume of construction which should provide an in- crease of about one-third in per capita living space over the next seven years. 70. The post-Stalin leadership has sought to make the most out of increases in consump- tion by selectively raising the money incomes of particular groups in the population while holding retail prices relatively stable. Al- though both rural and urban workers have received increases of approximately 18 per- cent in total real income during the period 1953-1957, rural workers gained relative to urban workers during the earlier part of the period and urban workers received the greater share of their increase during the latter part of the period. In industry, wages and sal- aries have been adjusted with the aim of re- lating incomes more closely to productivity in different occupations and in different indus- 20 tries. Continuation of this policy during the period of this estimate should bring consider- able improvement to the Soviet wage struc- ture. Foreign Trade 71. Soviet foreign trade policy will continue to subordinate short-run economic gains to the furtherance of national political objectives. Trade will continue to be utilized in an effort to strengthen Satellite ties with the Soviet Union, to provide capital goods for Chinese Communist industrialization, and to promote Soviet relationships with underdeveloped non- Bloc countries. Trade with the industrialized countries of the non-Bloc world will probably grow somewhat, and economic considerations will be the governing factor affecting such trade. 72. The maintenance of the Soviet empire in Eastern Europe and the alliance with Com- munist China, as well as trade policy toward the underdeveloped areas, will require exports of raw materials and capital equipment which otherwise would be used by the USSR to fur- ther its own economic growth, but the burden imposed upon the domestic economy by this policy will not affect significantly the planned rate of Soviet internal economic growth. On the other hand, internal forces affecting domestic growth will provide incentive for an increase of Soviet trade with the West, al- though such trade will continue to account for only about one-fourth of total Soviet for- eign trade. The aggregate impact of Soviet foreign trade upon the domestic economy is slight because exports and imports together amount to only approximately eight billion dollars or less than five percent of Soviet GNP. However, the export of scarce resources or the import of advanced design machinery and equipment for use as prototypes can be of greater significance to the economy than the total value of foreign trade would suggest. 73. Future developments in Soviet-Satellite trade will be influenced by the outcome of recent attempts to increase intra-Bloc eco- nomic integration and specialization but the effect will probably not be large. Although Bloc economic integration is expected to in- TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 21 crease, the benefits will be of greater impor- tance to the smaller Satellite economies than to the USSR. The Soviet Union imports ma- chinery from the Satellites, though the con- tribution to the Soviet economy of machinery imports from the Satellites will continue to be offset by the necessity of exporting scarce Soviet raw materials. The Soviet export sur- plus in its trade with the European Satellites will be reduced if repayments of credits granted to Satellite countries, scheduled to begin in 1960, are carried out. TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 22 III. TRENDS IN SOVIET SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 74. The USSR has for many years placed great emphasis on science and technology with a view to creating a corps of superior personnel and building a scientific establishment ade- quate to support its aspirations to national power. Soviet scientific effort has been fo- cused preponderantly on the building of a strong industrial base and the development of modern weapons. As a consequence, the USSR's achievements in areas of critical mili- tary and industrial significance are compara- ble to, and in some cases exceed, those of the US. During the past year, the Soviet Union has strikingly demonstrated to the world its maturity in science and technology. Earth satellite launchings, striking progress in weapons development, and fundamental re- search of military and economic significance attest to a rapidly increasing Soviet capability which presents a growing challenge to the Western World. 75. We believe that the rate of advance of So- viet science is accelerating in consequence of the building over the past three decades of a broad scientific and technical foundation. During this period, the number of graduates of scientific and technical curricula has con- stantly increased, research facilities have been greatly expanded, and the quality of So- viet scientific training has improved. The size of the Soviet research and development effort, in absolute terms, has been smaller than that of the US. However, the Soviet effort has been far more highly concentrated on fields related to national power, while re- search in consumer products has been propor- tionately much less. Soviet expenditures on science and technology are increasing yearly and probably permit full utilization of new personnel and facilities. Consequently, sig- nificant Soviet advances in science and tech- nology are likely to occur in the future with greater frequency than in the past. 76. The reorganization of economic adminis- tration in 1957 has probably been accom- panied by improved planning and coordina- tion of science, especially in the formulation of long-range and nation-wide scientific poli- cies. New scientific coordinating bodies have been established with authority to cut across administrative barriers, and planning is be- ing centralized under the State Planning Committee, which heretofore has had only a passive role in science planning. Scientists are being given more voice in planning and Soviet policies in science and technology are likely to reflect their point of view more fully. Concurrently with the centralization of planning and coordination, operational au- thority over research is being decentralized and directors of institutes are being given more administrative authority. 77. Applied research will continue to receive great emphasis in the USSR, although the importance of adequate fundamental re- search is well understood at the planning level. Highest priority will continue to be accorded to military-industrial research and development, but the rapid expansion of So- viet scientific resources will now permit greater flexibility. Greater individual initia- tive within assigned tasks of research will probably be encouraged, basic research in new fields undertaken, and somewhat more scientific and technical effort allocated to the consumer sector of the economy. Scientific Manpower, Training and Facilities 78. The number of scientifically and tech- nically trained people in the Soviet Union has increased approximately three-fold in the postwar period. We estimate that as of mid- 1958, about 1,625,000 graduates of university- level scientific and technical curricula are actually employed in all scientific and tech- nical fields, about 15 percent more than in the US. Although US graduations in scien- tific and technical fields are expected to in- crease, the USSR will continue to enjoy a numerical advantage. Based on current trends, by 1963 the USSR will probably have nearly 35 percent more graduates employed in scientific and technical work than the US, TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 23 as indicated by the accompanying table.7 It should be noted that the bulk of Soviet nu- merical superiority will continue to derive from graduates employed in industrial and agricultural production. The number of So- viet scientists engaged in research and teach- ing in the physical sciences has remained sub- stantially smaller than in the US, and is per- haps half the US total at present. However, Soviet emphasis on research in military and basic industrial fields probably results in a near numerical equality between the two countries in scientific manpower devoted to these critical activities. COMPARISON OF MAJOR SCIENTIFIC GROUPS, USSR AND US 7 (in thousands) Estimated Numbers of Graduates of Higher Educational Institutions Employed in Scientific and Technical Fields * Mid-1958 US Mid-1963 US USSR USSR Engineering 856 500 1,227 630 Agricultural Sciences 228 163 368 183 Health Sciences 382 452 448 492 Physical Sciences 108 184 144 276 Biological Sciences 52 80 79 112 Total 1,626 1,379 2,266 1,693 Estimated Numbers of Soviet Kandidats and American Ph.D.'s in Scientific and Technical Fields ** Mid-1958 USSR US Engineering 27 6 Agricultural Sciences 8 5 Health Sciences 17 1 Physical Sciences 18 34 Biological Sciences 18 Total 78 64 ? Estimates of the current total of Soviet scientific personnel are believed to be correct within plus or minus 10 percent. The probable error of certain groups, however, may exceed this amount. ** In the physical sciences, engineering, and the health sciences, the quality of the Kandidat degree is roughly equivalent to or slightly below that of the US Ph.D. In agricultural and biological sciences it is closer to that of a US Master's degree. 79. In the postwar period the quality of Soviet scientific training has been high. Engineer- ing training, while not as broad as that given 7Such numerical comparisons provide only a rough measure of relative scientific and tech- nical strength, since: (a) the professional cate- gories are not precisely equivalent in the two countries; (b) the figures do not reflect the broader US supply of scientific and technical personnel who hold no degrees; and (c) they give no weight to qualitative differences in training and experience. an engineer in the West, is good within the particular field of specialization. Some de- ficiencies continue in the practical and ex- perimental aspects of training, particularly in some fields of biology and engineering. Recent changes in higher school curricula, intended to overcome these deficiencies, in- clude requirements for more laboratory and independent experimental work outside the classroom, as well as a plan to allow superior students to follow individual study schedules. TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 24 The USSR is not as well supplied as the West- ern industrial nations with nonprofessional technicians, mechanics, and maintenance men. Shortages of skilled technicians will persist, but the number available should in- crease significantly as a result of the high proportion of scientific and technical subjects in the lower grades and the current emphasis on specialized training after lower school. 80. Soviet scientific facilities, in terms of fi- nancial support, organizational direction, and number and quality of laboratories, are gen- erally adequate for the utilization of scientific talent. In a few fields the USSR has facilities which are comparable, if not superior, to cor- responding installations in the West. The continued expansion of these facilities, as well as a Soviet attempt to establish a broader geographic base for research activities, is in- dicated by the establishment of new scientific centers in Siberia. Announced plans call for completion in 1960 of a new "scientific city" near Novosibirsk, consisting of 13 research institutes and a university now under con- struction. Another center near Irkutsk, con- sisting of eight research institutes, is sched- uled for completion in 1965. The regime is making a major effort to attract competent scientific personnel to the new centers by cre- ating favorable living conditions, establishing excellent research facilities, and assigning certain eminent scientists to these locations. 81. Some shortages of complex research in- struments are believed to exist, particularly in low priority fields, but they probably do not significantly hamper research programs of major importance. For example, although the US has a considerably larger number of high speed electronic computers than the USSR, the number of computer hours actu- ally utilized for high priority research is prob- ably nearly the same since Soviet computers are not called upon to serve routine business and government functions. Although Soviet- produced equipment is often the equal of foreign-produced equipment and occasionally its superior, the USSR will probably continue to import equipment for reasons of expedi- ency. During the next five years the USSR will continue to improve its capabilities in scientific instrumentation. Increasing num- bers of highly qualified engineers will proba- bly be made available for the development and production of scientific equipment, and an increasing amount of equipment will reflect original design concepts. However, we believe that the West will continue to lead in the development of scientific equipment except in fields given very high priority by the Soviets. 82. The Satellites have made significant scien- tific contributions to Soviet technological de- velopment in only a few areas, principally in optics, electrical measuring instruments, com- munications equipment, synthetic fibers and pharmaceuticals. We expect an increase in Soviet use of Satellite resources in some basic theoretical and experimental fields. The Council for Economic Mutual Assistance (CEMA) recently expanded the scope of its activities to include greater coordination and exchange in research and development activi- ties. CEMA member-nations are assigned major research, development, and production responsibilities for the entire Soviet Bloc in specified fields. 83. The USSR has become progressively less dependent on Western research and develop- ment. Nevertheless, the Soviet leaders have adopted a policy of acknowledging foreign achievement and encouraging maximum use of foreign experience. The USSR presently has an outstanding program for collection and dissemination of scientific and technical information. The All-Union Institute of Sci- entific and Technical Information of the Academy of Sciences publishes and circulates extensive abstracts of foreign journals and, at least in high priority fields, Soviet sci- entists have access to the full range of scien- tific research published throughout the world. Evidence of Soviet work on such new methods as machine translation, data searching, and data processing suggests that Soviet informa- tion handling facilities probably will improve during this period. 84. The Soviets have evidently profited from espionage in a few key fields. However, on an over-all basis the performance of Soviet sci- TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 25 ence ? especially the number of original con- cepts and discoveries ? reinforces our belief that the aggregate contribution of espionage to Soviet scientific progress has been far less important than the USSR's own achieve- ments. 85. The USSR is clearly anxious to take ad- vantage of the possibilities in international scientific exchange. Soviet participation in international scientific meetings and confer- ences has increased markedly during the last year, primarily in connection with the Inter- national Geophysical Year (IGY) , but involv- ing other scientific fields as well. The Soviet IGY program has been well-executed and comparable to the US program in scope. For the most part, the Soviets probably will live up to their agreements to exchange IGY in- formation, but are likely to withhold the re- sults of related investigations outside the formal IGY program. They are believed to have withheld considerable data derived from their earth satellites. The USSR probably will continue its active participation in the various international committees and organi- zations which are planning to extend pro- grams begun under the IGY. Soviet Capabilities in Major Scientific Fields 86. The USSR's achievements during the last year, including earth satellite launchings, weapons development, and the magnitude of its efforts in the IGY program, provide im- pressive evidence of the present high level of Soviet scientific capability. Animated by a spirit of intense competition with the US, Soviet scientists have made striking progress over the last year in many areas of funda- mental and applied research. In mathe- matics, many fields of physics, and a few fields of chemistry, fundamental research appears to be comparable in quality to that performed in leading nations of the West. In some fields, Soviet scientists are among the best in the world; their potential for wholly new dis- coveries must be considered equal to that of 1 4 Western scientists. 87. Space program.8 The establishment of the Interagency Commission for Interplan- etary Communications, announced by the USSR in April 1955, indicated the existence of a program with manned interplanetary travel as its stated ultimate objective. The program is supported by extensive Soviet re- search efforts in a number of related fields, including rocket propulsion, electronics, me- teorology, space medicine, astrobiology, astro- physics, and geophysics. Activities to the present appear to be directed toward the col- lection of scientific data and experience to provide the basis for future space programs, and to advance basic knowledge in the above fields. Since some satellite vehicles have probably employed basic ICBM hardware and some future space vehicles may also utilize ICBM components, the two programs are to some extent complementary. 88. Soviet successes with ballistic missiles and earth satellites point to a considerable capa- bility for early accomplishments in space. We believe that the USSR is presently capable of orbiting earth satellites weighing on the order of 5,000 pounds, of launching lunar probes and satellites and of launching planetary? probes to Mars and Venus. Its space program could also include: surveillance satellites and recoverable aeromedical satellites (1958- 1959) ; "soft landings" by lunar rockets and recoverable manned earth satellites (1959- 1960) ; a manned glide-type high altitude re- search vehicle (1960-1961) ; earth satellites weighing as much as 25,000 pounds and manned circumlunar flights (1961-1962). While each individual achievement appears feasible as to technical capability and earliest date attainable, we doubt that the USSR could accomplish all of these space flight activities within the time periods specified. 89. Communist China has announced its in- tention to launch an earth satellite, and there are indications that Chinese personnel are studying rocket technology with Soviet assist- ance. The Chinese would value highly the 8For a more detailed discussion of the Soviet space program, see NIE 11-5-58, "Soviet Capa- bilities in Guided Missiles and Space Vehicles," 19 August 1958 (TOP SECRET). TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 26 political and propaganda gains resulting from a launching, and we believe that an attempt in China is a possibility within the next year or so. Using Soviet equipment, and with So- viet direction throughout the project, the Chi- nese Communists could probably perform a successful earth satellite launching in about one or two years after initiation of the project. The USSR itself probably has the capability, with about six months' preparation, to place an earth satellite in orbit from Chinese terri- tory. There is as yet, however, no firm evi- dence of the initiation of any projects to launch earth satellites from the territory of Communist China. 90. Nonmilitary applications of atomic energy. There is evidence of a further reduction in the ambitious Soviet nuclear power program announced in February 1956 as part of the Sixth Five-Year Plan. At that time, the USSR set a mid-1960 goal of 2,000-2,500 megawatts of nuclear-electric generating capacity. How- ever, a Soviet reply to a UN questionnaire in March 1957 described a program which could produce a total capacity of about 1,400 mega- watts by that date. Recent statements by Soviet officials indicate a planned capacity of about 700 megawatts in mid-1960. We esti- mate that an additional 200 megawatts or more could be obtained from dual-purpose reactors installed at plutonium production sites, giving the USSR a total of at least 900 megawatts by mid-1960 if the latest plans ma- terialize. Continued references to the 2,000- 2,500 megawatt goal by leading Soviet author- ities indicate that the progressive decrease in nuclear generating capacity planned for 1960 reflects a slippage in Soviet plans rather than a reduction in the Soviet nuclear power pro- gram. The USSR is conducting extensive re- search on controlled thermonuclear reactions. 91. Soviet employment of radioactive isotopes and radiological techniques in medical, chem- ical, metallurgical, biological, and agricul- tural research lags behind that of the US by up to five years. While the USSR has been actively employing these means in research investigations, little originality has been dis- played and only recently has the quality of this type of research shown improvement. 92. Despite this lag, the USSR has initiated a sizable technical assistance program in nu- clear energy within the Bloc and has offered aid in this field to a number of non-Bloc countries. To encourage collaboration among nuclear scientists within the Bloc, the USSR established in 1956 a Joint Nuclear Research Institute near Moscow. Although the USSR is a member of International Atomic Energy Agency, its attitude toward the agency has been passive. Future Soviet activities outside of the Sino-Soviet Bloc probably will continue to be largely limited to unilateral offers of aid to non-Bloc nations. However, visits by Soviet scientists to Western nations and So- viet participation in international conferences may be increased. 93. Physics and mathematics. Some Soviet scientists in the various fields of physics and mathematics are the equals of those in the leading nations of the West. Greatest capa- bilities are exhibited in theoretical mathe- matics and physics, high-energy nuclear physics, low temperature physics, solid state physics, and acoustics. Research during this period will probably stress a number of studies related to the Soviet missile and space pro- grams, and will also include theoretical anti- gravity investigations, work in plasma physics, and elaboration of present theories of ion, photon, and free radical propulsion. Of great aid to research in physics and mathematics is the considerable Soviet capability in the de- sign, development and application of com- puters with larger memory capacity and in- creased operation speeds, as well as small com- puters suitable for mass production and usa- ble in small computation centers. 94. Geophysics. Soviet performance in the geophysical sciences is believed to be gener- ally equal to that of the US, and superior in some fields, particularly polar geophysics. The large and comprehensive Soviet IGY pro- gram is expected to have a considerable effect on the development of geophysics in the USSR. The orbiting of earth satellites carry- ing heavy payloads of complex instrumenta- tion probably has already given the USSR a lead in these methods of upper atmosphere and space research. The USSR probably will TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 27 make advances comparable to those of the US in meteorology and oceanography. It will probably continue to be among the world lead- ers in seismology, gravimetry, geomagnetism and geoelectricity, and will add to its already considerable achievement in permafrost re- search and geochemical prospecting. 95. Chemistry and metallurgy. The USSR lags behind the US in the magnitude and level of research effort in most fields of chemistry and metallurgy; however, Soviet research in certain areas continues to be of high caliber. A major strength will continue to be in the theoretical aspects of some fields of chemistry. There will probably be a major expansion of all chemical research, with particular empha- sis on fields where the West now leads, such as in petrochemicals, new plastic materials, and synthetic fibers. In metallurgy, research will be especially pushed in the high tempera- ture field and in those areas of metallurgy related to solid state physics, particularly in semiconductors and thermoelectric power generation. 96. Medical sciences. With some exceptions, Soviet medical research is still behind that of the US. Soviet research assets, however, are expanding rapidly and will continue to be concentrated in areas of high economic and military priority. The Soviets are conducting an advanced program in space medicine and astrobiology. The availability of rocket ve- hicles and effective propulsion systems has enabled the Soviets to use animals to test lif e- sustaining systems in space and under space equivalent conditions to a greater degree than has been possible in the US. We believe that they lead the US in rocket flight physiology, studies of possible forms of life on other planets, and in the techniques and equipment for recovery of test subjects from extreme alti- tudes. However, there are no indications that they have conducted prolonged space equivalent work similar to the US manned balloon experiments. The USSR will expand its intensive research program in the control of human behavior, especially in condition- ing techniques. In addition, the Soviets will probably maintain their lead in research on the effects of radiation on the nervous sys- tem. It is possible that they will attain the lead in the study of the effects of cosmic radia- tion on organisms. 97. Biological and agricultural sciences. There has been a notable improvement in the quality of Soviet research in certain areas of the biological and agricultural sciences. Ex- cept in a few specific fields, however, the USSR still lags behind most Western coun- tries in these sciences. Although Lysenko retains some limited political support, ideo- logical theories are probably no longer per- mitted to interfere with sound research in biology and agriculture, and Soviet genetics research should improve markedly. We be- lieve that agricultural research and develop- ment will receive increasing support, which should assist the Soviet effort to increase food supplies. 98. Industrial technology. For the immedi- ate future, we estimate that the general level of Soviet industrial technology will remain below that of the US. However, the most modern Soviet plants are already on a par with those in the US, and the average level of heavy industrial technology will probably im- prove. Striking progress has been made over the last few years in the theory and practice of automation. Additional semiautomatic and possibly fully automatic production lines will be established during the period of this estimate. There will probably be increased emphasis on engineering process research and on shortening the lead times necessary to bring developed items into production. How- ever, research and technology in consumer goods fields will continue to lag far behind that of the US. TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 28 IV. DEVELOPMENTS AFFECTING THE SOVIET MILITARY POSTURE SOVIET MILITARY THINKING AND POLICY Major Objectives of Military Policy 99. Soviet military thinking and policy since the end of World War II, and particularly since the death of Stalin, have been strongly influenced by a growing appreciation of the devastation inherent in nuclear war and of the threat to the USSR's objectives and se- curity posed by Western nuclear capabilities. The Soviet leaders have made strong efforts to build a substantial offensive nuclear capa- bility of their own and to improve their air defenses; indeed, to build up a broad range of offensive and defensive capabilities, both nu- clear and nonnuclear. At the same time, Soviet political activity has aimed at reducing the military and political usefulness of US nuclear capabilities by attempting to make US overseas bases untenable and to increase the inhibitions attached to any use of nuclear weapons. 100. We believe that despite these efforts the Soviet leaders appreciate that if they launched a general war at present, even with surprise nuclear attacks, the USSR would suffer un- acceptable damage from US nuclear retalia- tion. On the other hand, they are probably confident that their own nuclear capabilities, even though not as great as those of the US, have grown to the point where they consti- tute a powerful military deterrent to the US. It is therefore probable that in the Soviet view both sides are now militarily deterred from deliberately initiating an all-out nuclear war or from reacting to any crisis in a manner which would gravely risk such a war, unless vital national interests at home or abroad were considered to be in jeopardy. 101. The Soviets probably see this situation as a great improvement over the relation of forces which existed some years ago. Nevertheless, we believe that the Soviet leaders will con- tinue to seek ways to achieve, if possible, a clear military superiority over the US. To this end they will continue their intensive weapons research and development, particu- larly in such fields as long-range missiles, air- craft and missile-launching submarines ca- pable of attacking the continental US, air defense weapons and associated equipment. But despite further improvement in Soviet capabilities over the next five years, we believe that the USSR will still not become confident that it can attack the US without receiving unacceptable damage in return. This judg- ment assumes the maintenance and improve- ment of US armed strength and the absence of an unforeseen Soviet technological break- through of major military significance. 102. While strengthening their capability for waging general war, the Soviets will endeavor to maintain forces which they consider ade- quate to insure military superiority in situa- tions short of general war. To the extent that Western inhibitions against vigorous reaction in local situations are increased by the USSR's growing capability for general war, superiority in forces for local conflict will enable the So- viets to exert greater political pressure in local situations, and even give them greater freedom to use force in such situations. In sum, the Soviet leaders will view large deterrent and other military capabilities as an essential sup- port to their foreign policy and to the USSR's status as a leading world power. Soviet Attitudes Toward Limited and Gen- eral War 103. As indicated elsewhere (Chapter VI, par- agraphs 224-227) we believe that the Soviet leaders do not at present intend to pursue their objectives by employing their own forces in warfare, limited or general. But they will also recognize that, particularly in consequence of the policies they are pursuing to compel a retraction of Western power by political means, situations might arise in which the use of force on a local scale would seem essen- tial to one side or the other. In such situa- tions the Soviets would prefer to provide log- istic and other support for local operations in which only non-Soviet forces participated di- rectly. Their objectives in such operations would be limited, and they would seek to avoid direct Soviet involvement, to limit the geo- TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 29 graphic area of engagement, and to prevent the use of nuclear weapons by either side. 104. Soviet planners probably consider, how- ever, that such limitations might be impossible in some instances, and that encounters be- tween their own and Western forces might result. They would prefer to minimize the amount of force employed in such situations, in order to limit the scale of conflict and the degree of their own involvement as much as possible. For example, they would almost certainly wish to avoid the use of nuclear weapons. In deciding whether to employ their own forces in any particular local situ- ation the Soviets would have to balance the risk of provoking a train of counteractions, possibly leading to general war, against the stakes involved in the area of local conflict. They probably believe that the West's military posture and doctrine rest increasingly upon the use of nuclear weapons, even in limited wars. But they probably also view their own nuclear deterrent capabilities as already hav- ing raised the threshold at which the West would react in such a manner. 105. It is impossible to forecast how the So- viets would behave in all the situations of local conflict which might arise. Despite the confi- dence they evidently now have in the power of their own deterrent, we believe that they would handle such situations with the greatest caution. They would realize that the dangers of miscalculation would mount as each side increased the scale of its involvement. There- fore we believe that the Soviets would seek to prevent any crisis from developing in such a way as to leave themselves only a choice be- tween accepting a serious reverse and taking action which would substantially increase the likelihood of general war. The Soviet leaders would almost certainly not decide to precipi- tate general war unless they concluded that conceding a position to the West would sooner or later threaten the survival of their regime. 106. We believe that the Soviets recognize that very great advantages would accrue to the side striking the first blow in an all-out nuclear war, and that therefore, in the event that they decided on general war, they would themselves initiate it by strategic nuclear attacks. The primary objective of such attacks would be to destroy or neutralize Western nuclear retali- atory capabilities?or at any rate to achieve the maximum possible reduction in the weight of Western retaliation that would have to be met by Soviet air defenses. To an extent con- sistent with this first priority, other key US war-making capabilities would probably also be attacked. 107. The outbreak of general war would prob- ably find the USSR at a state of military readiness beyond that of ordinary peacetime, but short of what Soviet planners might be- lieve best for the most rapid exertion of their total military effort. During any local war or crisis which they viewed as likely to become increasingly serious, Soviet planners would almost certainly prepare against the possi- bility of a general conflict. However, they would not want to push preparations so far as to convince the US that general war was im- minent, lest this lead the US to strike the first all-out nuclear blow. The probability of in- creased Western readiness during a crisis, together with the normally widespread deploy- ment of Western nuclear striking forces in the US and overseas, would make it doubtful that the Soviets could count on achieving surprise against all of these forces, but they would almost certainly attempt to do so. 108. Soviet recognition of the importance of surprise in modern military operations has been reflected in articles and statements over the last few years, but it is evident that Soviet military theoreticians do not regard surprise as the decisive factor in the outcome of a major war between great powers. In fact, they hold that in such a war the strategic attack capa- bilities of both sides might expend themselves and leave eventual victory to the side with the greatest residual strength, capacity for recov- ery, and ability to occupy territory. They visualize an important role for their ground, tactical air, and naval forces in a general war, which in their view would probably become a protracted war of attrition.9 'The Assistant Chief of Staff, Intelligence, USAF, believes that as written this paragraph does not correctly reflect the Soviet judgment of the role of surprise in a general war. He believes it is evi- dent that Soviet military theoreticians consider surprise probably would be the decisive factor in the outcome of a war between great powers. TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 30 109. In the event of general war, Soviet ground, tactical air, and naval forces would probably be launched in major campaigns against Europe, the Middle East, and the Far East, in order to defeat those Western forces within reach and to seize military objectives in those areas as well as their industrial and economic resources. The USSR would prob- ably plan to commit its ready forces to an of- fensive against NATO, especially through Western Germany, as soon as possible consist- ent with its attempt to achieve surprise for its initial assaults against the US, overseas US and allied nuclear bases, and naval striking forces. Campaigns in other areas would be of lesser priority, but we believe that in a general war situation they would probably be initiated with little delay. 110. In addition to participation in inital stra- tegic attacks and support of other major Soviet campaigns, the major offensive effort of the Soviet Navy in general war would be the world- wide interdiction of Western sea communica- tions and reinforcement, intended to isolate overseas theaters from the US. The major defensive effort of Soviet naval forces would be to prevent Western carrier strikes and sub- marine-launched missile attacks against Bloc targets. Policy on Size and Types of Forces 111. In assessing the size and types of military forces which would best fulfill their major objectives, the Soviets will almost certainly continue to believe that they must keep a large and diversified military establishment, de- signed to meet various contingencies, up to and including general war. While they will work to acquire additional capabilities with advanced weapon systems, they will at all times maintain substantial forces-in-being. Nevertheless, there will be increasing competi- tion among military requirements of different types, and between military requirements and the demands of highly important nonmilitary programs, resulting in part from the cost and complexity of new weapons and equipment. In deciding whether to produce complex new weapon systems in quantity, the USSR will probably apply increasingly severe tests as to whether these would add greatly to current capabilities or tend significantly to alter the world balance of forces, and as to whether costs were justified by likely periods of use before obsolescence. There may therefore be a growing tendency in some fields to make do with existing equipment until significantly advanced weapons can be acquired. 112. We also believe that for several years the Soviet leaders have been interested in finding ways to reduce the number of men under arms. The reasons for doing this will continue to apply, and in the future may become more compelling. An important factor will be the pressure imposed by a shortage of manpower for the rapidly growing Soviet economy (see Chapter II, paragraph 64) . Other reasons in- clude the desire for economies in order to ease the burden of increasing costs of new equip- ment, and the propaganda value of force re- ductions. The importance of the last of these factors has been evident in the USSR's well- publicized announcements of military person- nel cuts over the last three years. Reductions amounting to over 1.8 million men in the 1955-1957 period have been claimed, and in January 1958 a further planned reduction of 300,000 men was announced, bringing the total to more than 2.1 millions. 113. On the basis of Soviet conscription trends, published labor statistics, and other indirect data, we believe that there has in fact been a substantial reduction in the number of men in service since the peak reached during the Korean War. A considerable portion of this reduction apparently occurred prior to the first Soviet announcement of cuts in 1955. Reductions are known to have been made in nonessential supporting and administrative elements. It is probable that other reductions were accomplished by cutting down the strength of certain units and by the transfer of labor troops from military to nonmilitary status. On the other hand, we have acquired no evidence of the deactivation of any major units and we are fairly certain that most of the units withdrawn from satellite areas in recent years were merely moved to locations within the USSR. TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 114. The evidence suggests that in their an- nouncements the Soviets took propaganda ad- vantage of fairly substantial reductions made after the Korean War, and that additional reductions were in fact begun but were de- layed or cancelled entirely. The apparent failure to carry out the announced cuts may have been due in part to increased tension in the satellites, and in the world situation gen- erally, beginning in the fall of 1956. It may also have resulted in part from Soviet dis- covery that reductions in some elements were to a large extent offset by the increased need for technically-qualified personnel to serve new and more complex equipment. 115. On the basis of available order-of-battle information, we estimate present Soviet mili- tary manpower strength at somewhat more than 4 million men, of whom about 2,650,000 are in ground force units, about 835,000 are in the air forces (including about 110,000 naval aviation personnel) , about 765,000 are in naval units, and about 75,000 are in air defense con- trol and warning. In addition, we carry about 400,000 men in border guard and internal se- curity forces.1? While there has been no re- liable evidence of reductions over the last year, we do not exclude the possibility that the So- viet leaders believe that some additional cuts can be made without danger to Soviet security. But we think it unlikely that in the present state of the Bloc's relations with the West further reductions of substantial size would be made. 116. Military policy toward other bloc na- tions. The Soviet leaders view the East Eu- ropean area as vital to the military posture of the USSR, both as an extension of the defense perimeter of the homeland and as a base for offensive power; Communist China and North Korea similarly strengthen the strategic posi- tion of the USSR. The Soviets will therefore continue to provide substantial military aid to the Satellite and Chinese Communist mili- tary establishments, including weapons, equip- 1? For more detailed estimates of the personnel strength of Soviet and other Bloc forces, see Annex, Tables 1 and 2; it should be understood that these figures are only approximate and that there is considerable uncertainty inherent in this type of estimate. 31 ment, and training assistance. They will continue their efforts under the Warsaw Pact to develop and maintain reliable and effective forces in the East European Satellites, but they probably do not contemplate any signifi- cant expansion of these forces. It is unlikely that Soviet planners would count on East European forces in general to make an impor- tant contribution to Soviet military opera- tions, except perhaps in air defense and in maintaining security for lines of communica- tion. 117. The Soviets probably regard the increas- ing military capabilities of Communist China with mixed feelings. While Chinese military strength is a valuable addition to the power of the Communist Bloc, as this strength grows it will also give China increasing weight within the Bloc. It will be many years before the Chinese have a large and modern arms industry of their own, a development the So- viets might view with misgivings in any case, and in the interim the Chinese will press for Soviet aid to effect a costly modernization of their forces. We believe that the Soviets will probably try to restrain the pace of Chi- nese military development in order to prevent the Chinese from achieving too large a degree of military independence. But they will prob- ably also feel that they have no choice but to support such development. It is probable therefore that they will continue to assist the Chinese in developing and producing certain types of modern equipment. They will also probably begin to supply such Soviet-made weapons as jet medium bombers, advanced fighters and guided missiles for air defense, and possibly short-range missiles for offensive use as well. The USSR would probably retain control over any nuclear weapons based in the territory of Communist China or other Bloc nations. SPECIAL WEAPON DEVELOPMENTS Nuclear Weapons 118. The USSR is known to have conducted more than 70 nuclear tests since August 1949 in its program to develop a variety of nuclear weapons. Two test series were conducted during 1958. In the first series, 13 tests were conducted at two widely separated TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 32 proving grounds during the three months pre- ceding the USSR's announcement of a uni- lateral test suspension on 31 March 1958. The Soviets resumed testing in a second series which began in September 1958. Explosions in the latest series have included two of about seven megatons, about twice the yield of the largest Soviet explosion detected previously. The latest two tests were of low yield and were conducted in the general vicinity of Kapustin Yar. From the present technical evaluation of the 1958 tests, it appears that the Soviets made further advances in the development of high yield weapons suitable for use in bombs or missile warheads. They also apparently sought to improve low yield weapons from the standpoint of size and economy of fissionable materials, probably in order to meet air de- fense as well as other requirements. 119. We estimate that at present the Soviet stockpile could include nuclear weapons in a range of yields from about 2 KT to about 8 MT; we do not exclude the possibility that untested bombs with yields of as much as 20 MT could be in stockpile on an emergency or provisional basis.11 We have insufficient evidence to sup- port a firm estimate of the numbers and types of nuclear weapons in the Soviet stockpile. There is, however, considerable evidence from the Soviet nuclear test program and from other intelligence sources, providing indica- tions as to what types of weapons the USSR may be stockpiling and on what delivery sys- tems it contemplates. Based on an analysis of various factors involved, we believe that: (a) nuclear weapons, including high-yield weapons suitable for bomber delivery, are now widely deployed to Long Range Aviation units, and the Soviets will seek to provide such weapons for all bombers of this component which are designated for weapons delivery; (b) nuclear warheads are being and will be produced in numbers sufficient to equip sub- stantially all operational submarine-launched missiles, and ground-launched ballistic mis- siles of 700 n.m. range and greater; " For a detailed estimate of the present and future Soviet nuclear weapons development potential, see NIE 11-2-58, "The Soviet Atomic Energy Pro- gram," 14 January 1958 (Limited Distribution) . See also the forthcoming NIE 11-2-59. (c) Soviet doctrine contemplates the tacti- cal use of nuclear weapons by ground, tactical air, and naval forces, and some such weapons are probably now available for this purpose; (d) the Soviets' emphasis on air defense will lead them to provide nuclear warheads for some proportion of their surface-to-air and air-to-air missiles, but a sizable allocation for such purposes has probably not yet been made. 120. Considering the estimated availability of fissionable materials and the level of Soviet nuclear weapons technology, we believe that at present the USSR probably possesses sufficient nuclear weapons to support a major attack by its long-range striking forces, but that cur- rent stockpiles are probably insufficient for large-scale allocation to air defense and tacti- cal use. We estimate a substantial and high priority Soviet program for the expansion of fissionable material production through the period of this estimate, and we believe that the USSR is capable of considerable further im- provement in nuclear weapons technology. Thus, by the end of the period the current limitation on the allocation of nuclear ma- terials to air defense and tactical operations will have eased, although even then and for a longer period, limitations imposed by the avail- ability of fissionable materials will still be felt.12 121. Prior to its suspension of testing in March 1958, the USSR had probably developed types of nuclear weapons which could meet most of its major requirements for such weap- ons. However, strong technical motivations have continued to exist for further testing, for example in the categories of lighter-weight, more efficient warheads for air defense and other purposes, higher yield warheads, and antimissile defense techniques. The USSR's reasons for conducting nuclear tests in the fall of 1958 probably included the desire to " For estimates of present and future cumulative availability of fissionable material in the USSR, see NIE 11-2-58. For theoretical ranges of mixed nuclear weapon stockpiles, as well as illustrative stockpiles showing reasonable maximum and minimum limits for certain categories of weap- ons, see the Supplement to NIE 11-2-58, "Possible Soviet Allocations of Fissionable Material to Weapons Stockpiles," 1958-1962, 30 September 1958 (Limited Distribution). TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 33 fulfill technical requirements and, to a lesser extent, the desire to create a situation in which there would be increased world pressure for a ban on further testing. Considering the achievements of the Soviet nuclear test pro- gram to date and the broader advantages the USSR may feel it can achieve by negotiating a multilateral test cessation, we believe that technical requirements alone would not pre- vent the USSR from joining in a test ban. We also believe that if an agreed ban with a suitable control system were negotiated, the Soviets would be unlikely to attempt to carry out a concealed test or abrogate the agree- ment, at least for some time, but would in- corporate into their weapons program such refinements as could be achieved without new test explosions. 122. Although we do not know the Soviet esti- mate of minimum stockpile requirements for fissionable materials, we doubt that such re- quirements have been met and we know that production facilities are expanding. There- fore, while the USSR might enter negotiations on cessation of weapons material production, we believe it would neither unilaterally cease such production nor agree to mutual cessa- tion in the near future. Guided Missiles 123. The USSR continues to press ahead with an extensive research and development pro- gram embracing all major categories of guided missiles. Soviet achievements in surface-to- surface ballistic missiles have been especially impressive, and substantial success has also been achieved in developing surface-to-air missiles. While available evidence is not suf- ficient to indicate comparable emphasis and success in other Soviet missile programs, we believe the USSR now has a variety of missile systems available for operational use. It is capable of developing advanced systems in all categories during the period of this estimate, and the experience it has already acquired in missile production, troop training, logistics, and deployment procedures will facilitate the expansion of its operational capabilities." 124. On the basis of considerable evidence concerning the research and development program, we believe that for several years the USSR has had available for operational use surface-to-surface ballistic missiles with maxi- mum ranges of about 100 n.m., 200 n.m., 350 n.m., and 700 n.m. It has also been develop- ing and probably now has available for oper- ational use a ballistic missile of 1,100 n.m. maximum range. In addition, a very short range antitank missile is probably now oper- ational. 125. Intercontinental ballistic missile. Since the completion of NIE 11-5-58, we have con- ducted an intensive re-examination of the Soviet ICBM test firing program and its im- plications. On the basis of sufficient intelli- gence coverage to establish with a high degree of confidence the number of Soviet ICBM test firings, it is clear that over the past year this number has not been as great as we had an- ticipated. Nevertheless, considering the So- viets' progress in the whole field of missiles and the capabilities demonstrated in their ICBM, earth satellite, and other ballistic mis- sile launchings, we continue to estimate that the USSR will probably achieve a first opera- tional capability with 10 prototype ICBMs at some time during the year 1959. While it is possible that a limited capability with com- paratively unproven ICBMs might have been established in 1958, we believe this to be unlikely." 13 ? 14 For an extended discussion of the USSR's guided missile development program, and of factors likely to affect its acquisition of substantial oper- ational capabilities, see NIE 11-5-58, "Soviet Capabilities in Guided Missiles and Space Ve- hicles," 19 August 1958 (TOP SECRET) . NOTE: Some statements by high Soviet officials during the past year have indicated that the USSR already possessed, or at least wished us to think it possessed, a considerable operational ICBM capability. Such a capability cannot be ruled out as impossible if the Soviets have had a test philosophy involving fewer long-range tests and more reliance upon component tests at Kapustin Yar than we think likely. Such a philosophy would run greater risks of failure and provide less assurance of accuracy and reliability but also (if all went well) much more rapid achievement of operational capability. The So- viets may have believed the political and psycho- logical value of ICBMs is so great as to justify extreme measures to attain a substantial and early deployment. TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 126. When it first becomes operational, the Soviet ICBM system will probably be capable of delivering a nuclear payload to a maximum range of about 5,500 n.m., with an accuracy (CEP) of about 5 n.m. and a reliability of about 50 percent after launching. (Some ad- ditional percentage of missiles, which we are unable to estimate, would prove unserviceable before launching.) We estimate that the So- viet ICBM is designed to carry a nuclear pay- load of about 2,000 pounds, although there is a possibility that it is designed to carry about 5,000 pounds. Reliability will probably be considerably improved by the early 1960's. At the beginning of the period 1962-1966, the CEP could be about 3 n.m. with radio com- mand/inertial guidance, and could be re- duced to about 2 n.m. later in that period. In 1960-1963, an all-inertial system with a CEP of 3-5 n.m. will probably be available. 127. For air defense, the USSR now has avail- able two different types of surface-to-air mis- siles, one of which is employed in the fixed missile complex around Moscow and the other of which is probably suitable for employment with the Moscow system or with a semimobile system. These missiles have greatest effec- tiveness against aircraft at altitudes of 30,000 to 60,000 feet; they are relatively short range (15-30 n.m.) and almost certainly neither is effective at very low altitudes (below about 1,500 feet) . During 1959-1961, surface-to-air systems with increased range and improved high and low altitude capabilities will prob- ably become operational for defense of fixed targets, field forces, and naval vessels. Short- range air-to-air missiles (up to 6 n.m.) suitable for employment with currently operational Soviet fighter aircraft types are probably also available, and a longer-range missile (15-20 n.m.) will probably be developed by 1960. In 1963-1966 the USSR will probably achieve a first operational capability with a surface-to- air system of limited effectiveness against ICBMs and possibly against IRBMs. 128. For employment by submarines, the USSR probably now has available a subsonic cruise-type missile system capable of deliver- ing nuclear warheads against land targets 34 within about 200 n.m. of the launching sub- marine. These missiles could be launched by a submarine only after surfacing. In 1961- 1963 the USSR will probably have available for first operational use a submarine-launched ballistic missile system capable of delivering nuclear warheads from a submerged subma- rine to a range of about 1,000 n.m. It is also possible that the USSR will develop a 1,000 n.m. cruise-type system for first operational use in 1960. 129. A Soviet air-to-surface missile system is now capable of carrying nuclear warheads at subsonic speed to a range of about 55 n.m. against ships and other targets clearly defin- able on radar. The USSR will probably have operational in 1960-1961 a supersonic air-to- surface missile with a range of at least 100 n.m., suitable for employment against a wide variety of targets. Chemical and Biological Warfare 130. Current Soviet tactical doctrine recog- nizes the potentialities of CW and BW as use- ful complements to other weapons. Soviet military forces receive thorough training in the offensive use of CW as well as in defense against it. A stockpile of CW agents is be- lieved to be maintained at the World War II level and may have been increased. It prob- ably consists of the nerve agents, principally Tabun (GA) and in lesser quantity Sarin (GB), as well as standard agents such as mus- tard. A nerve agent of the "V" type, far more persistent and toxic than the "G" agents, may have been in production in the USSR since 1956. Research is probably also under way in the field of nonlethal, incapacitating agents. 131. The Soviets possess standard munitions for the dissemination of toxic agents by artil- lery shells, and it is probable that a supply of such munitions is normally carried by ar- tillery units. CW agent dispersion by bombs and aircraft spray is also contemplated. Im- proved aerosol-producing devices necessary to the effective employment of "V" agents are believed to be under development. It is also possible that CW warheads have been devel- oped for certain types of guided missiles. TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 132. The existence of an active Soviet BW re- search and development program has been confirmed, through identification of a re- search center and field test site as well as through extensive Soviet literature applicable to this subject. While most known Soviet re- search is also applicable to public health prob- lems, we believe the Soviet program includes research on antipersonnel, antilivestock, and possibly anticrop agents. There is no evidence of the existence of a mass-production facility for BW agents, but existing plants for the production of biologicals, together with other laboratories, could easily produce BW agents in quantities sufficient for clandestine employ- ment and probably for larger-scale use. 133. In the field of defense against BW and CW, present Soviet capabilities are at least comparable to those of the major Western na- tions, and in the case of CW are probably superior. Soviet troops are well-equipped with satisfactory CW defense items, many of which are also suitable for use in defense against BW. The current issue gas mask affords ade- quate protection against inhalation of known toxic agents, and articles of protective cloth- ing issued to all troops afford protection against toxic agent spray and area contamina- tion. Extensive programs continue to indoc- trinate the civilian populace as well as mili- tary personnel in defensive techniques. Electromagnetic Warfare 134. We believe that at present the USSR has an appreciable capability for jamming West- ern radars at frequencies up to 10,000 mc/s and possibly higher, and especially for jam- ming at lower frequencies normally used in Western long-range radio communications. The Soviets are now producing magnetrons and traveling wave tubes suitable for jamming in the microwave frequencies, and research in this field is continuing. They are also cur- rently employing passive detection equipment believed capable of detecting signals from the very low frequencies up into the microwave spectrum. By 1963, the USSR will have in operational use equipment capable of jam- ming at frequencies from 10 kc/s through 35 36,000 mc/s, including all frequencies likely to be employed by Western communications, radar, and navigation equipment. 135. In recent months a trend toward greater frequency diversification in Soviet radar and radio equipment has appeared, in contrast to the earlier concentration of frequencies in a few narrow bands. The USSR is capable of further increasing the spread of frequencies employed and of developing improved anti- jamming techniques, but through 1963 So- viet electronic systems will probably still be subject to disruption by properly employed techniques. STRENGTHS AND CAPABILITIES OF SOVIET FORCES 136. High command. Top control over all ad- ministrative and operational activity in the Soviet military establishment is vested in a single authority, the Minister of Defense. Di- rectly under the Minister of Defense is a single general staff, organized along functional lines into operations, intelligence, communications, military transportation, organization and mo- bilization, historical, and topographical sec- tions. The major administrative elements of the Soviet armed forces include the chief di- rectorates of ground, air, air defense, and naval forces, each headed by a commander-in- chief who reports directly to the Minister of Defense. Operational control flows in a direct chain of command from the Minister of De- fense to the commanders of the major opera- tional elements: military districts, groups of forces, naval fleets, air defense forces, Long Range Aviation, and possibly airborne forces. 137. Despite extreme centralization of re- sponsibility, the Soviet command system re- tains sufficient flexibility to effect integrated employment of all types of forces in either large- or small-scale operations. Constant at- tention to new requirements will bring about significant changes in armament and some re- alignment among components, but we antici- pate no radical alteration of the Soviet high command structure in the near future. In the following paragraphs, the different types TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 36 of Soviet forces are discussed in terms of their capabilities to perform those military missions which we believe would be assigned by the Soviet high command, i.e., long-range attack, air defense, major land campaigns, and naval warfare. Long-Range Striking Forces 138. Since the end of World War II the USSR has devoted a major effort to the develop- ment of nuclear striking forces capable of attacking distant military, industrial, and other targets, not only in and near Eurasia but in North America as well. This effort has been dictated by the fact that the US, itself possessed of long-range striking forces, lay beyond the range of traditional Soviet mili- tary power. The principal component of So- viet military strength presently capable of long-range nuclear attack is Long Range Avia- tion, equipped with medium and heavy bomb- ers. The medium bombers of Naval and Tac- tical Aviation, as well as the light bombers of these components, contribute to the Soviet capability for attack on targets in Eurasia and its periphery. Ground-launched and sub- marine-launched guided missiles probably now supplement the bomber capability. 139. Long-range bombers. We estimate the strength of Soviet Long Range Aviation, as of 1 October 1958, at approximately 1,450 bomb- ers, including about 400 obsolete BULL pis- ton medium bombers, about 950 BADGER jet medium bombers, and about 100 to 125 BISON jet and BEAR turboprop heavy bombers. At least one-fourth of the BISON and BADGER regiments in this force have some aircraft of these types which are convertible tanker- bombers. Medium bombers have also been supplied to other components?there are now about 250 BADGERs and a few BULLs in Naval Aviation units and about 100 BADGERs in Tactical Aviation units. 140. The capabilities of Long Range Aviation have been markedly increased in the last five years, through the introduction of large num- bers of modern aircraft, more realistic and larger-scale training exercises, improvement of potential staging bases in the Arctic, de- velopment of inflight refueling, and improve- ment of electronic equipment for ECM, bomb- ing, navigation and other purposes. Nuclear weapons storage sites have been identified at many Long Range Aviation home bases, and we believe that nuclear bombs are now the primary weapons of this force. A few BADGER units of both Long Range and Naval Aviation are probably now trained and equipped to employ air-to-surface missiles suitable for use against ships and other well- defined targets. 141. Despite these improvements Soviet Long Range Aviation still consists primarily of me- dium bombers, best suited for operations against targets in Eurasia and its periphery, and capable of attacking the continental US only through extensive use of one-way mis- sions. The history of the Soviet heavy bomber program leads us to believe that despite the efforts devoted to developing the BISON and BEAR, Soviet planners probably decided within the last year or two to forego a rapid build-up with present heavy bomber models. This decision may have been reached as a result of one or more of the following factors: dissatisfaction with the performance of BISON and BEAR; progress in developing new or improved bombers; confidence in Soviet ability to acquire an ICBM capability at an early date. Contributing to the decision may have been a Soviet belief that the USSR's me- dium bomber force, together with a small heavy bomber capability, is at least tempo- rarily acceptable as a deterrent force, and for use against the US should general war occur. 142. The Soviets will almost certainly con- tinue to strive for technological superiority over the US in intercontinental weapon sys- tems. Presumably they set great store by the ICBM as posing an entirely new type of threat. But Soviet military planners almost certainly feel that even though they have good pros- pects of acquiring a substantial long-range striking capability with missiles, manned bombers will still be required. Manned bombers, especially advanced types, will pro- vide the Soviets with flexibility and diversifi- TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET cation of attack capabilities, and will remain particularly applicable for attacks on small, hardened targets, damage assessment, and reconnaissance. We therefore believe that the USSR will retain a large force of long-range bombers throughout the period of this esti- mate, although its size will probably decline gradually. Its inflight refueling techniques will probably be improved and extended to a larger part of the force; however, there is no present evidence of the development of an aircraft specifically for use as a tanker. Im- proved electronic and other supporting equip- ment will probably be provided. Air-to-sur- face missile launching capabilities will prob- ably be augmented as more effective missiles are developed. 143. Future projections of the strength and composition of Soviet Long Range Aviation are complicated by the fact that at present the entire Soviet medium and heavy bomber industry is in a state of transition, involving considerably less current production than a year or two ago. Production at BADGER plants now appears to be tapering off, al- though it will probably be sufficient to provide moderate further increases in the jet medium bomber force. The one identified BISON plant, at Moscow, has continued to produce aircraft of this type at a low and uneven rate, while its design bureau has been working to develop a new type of large bomber. A total of about a dozen BISONs have been completed since April 1958, bringing cumulative produc- tion to about 100 aircraft. While considerably less evidence is available on BEAR production, we believe it unlikely that any new BEAR bombers have been produced for well over a year, or that more than 50 to 60 were produced altogether. In the interim, the one identified producer has probably been overhauling exist- ing BEARs, modifying some aircraft of this type for transport use, and building a few new transports of the CLEAT type (similar to the BEAR). Despite the decline in long-range bomber production, the USSR's plant capacity suitable for production of large aircraft has been considerably enlarged over the last few years, and there is some evidence to suggest 37 that several plants are preparing to produce large bombers or transports. 144. Research and development in new bomber types has continued and we believe that it will be intensively pursued throughout the period of this estimate. Considering the demonstrated level of Soviet technology in such fields as aircraft propulsion and aero- dynamics, and the normal development of these capabilities, we have estimated that within the next few years the USSR could probably place into operational units: (a) improved versions of the BISON and BADGER, at any time; (b) a new subsonic heavy bomber with range and other performance characteristics somewhat better than those of an improved BISON, in 1959 or 1960; (c) a new medium bomber with supersonic "dash" capabilities and a range approximat- ing that of an improved BADGER, in 1960 or 1961. 145. Since none of these aircraft types would add substantially to Soviet capabilities for two-way intercontinental operations, we have reasoned that the USSR might proceed di- rectly to more advanced types, such as a heavy bomber powered by high-energy chemi- cal fuel, capable of supersonic speed and high altitude, or possibly a subsonic nuclear- powered aircraft capable of long endurance, even at low altitudes. We continue to esti- mate that some aircraft of either or both these types could probably be in operational units by mid-1963. We also believe that with- in the next few years the USSR could fly an airborne nuclear testbed, with at least one nuclear power unit providing useful thrust during some phase of the flight.15 The attainment of a nuclear propulsion sys- tem for operational use in supersonic air- craft would probably require a long test and 15 The Assistant Chief of Naval Operations for In- telligence, Department of the Navy, and the Director for Intelligence, The Joint Staff, believe that the USSR could fly such a testbed during 1959. The Assistant Chief of Staff, Intelligence, USAF, believes that an aircraft nuclear propul- sion system could now be undergoing flight tests in a prototype airframe. TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 38 development program extending beyond the period of this estimate.16 146. Recent evidence of Soviet developmental efforts includes the observation at Moscow of a new bomber, designated BOUNDER, of large size and heavy weight, with a modified delta-wing configuration apparently designed for supersonic flight. With the limited in- formation available, it has not been possible to determine the BOUNDER's intended mission, but we believe it could repre- sent a significant step forward in So- viet bomber design. Preliminary analysis indicates BOUNDER to be powered by four turbojet engines. The use of conventional fuels would give it a range marginal for in- tercontinental bombing. The possibility for. development of BOUNDER with a more ad- vanced propulsion system exists, and the de- sign intent for a nuclear-powered vehicle can- not be excluded at this time. However, present information is inadequate to permit an estimate of BOUNDER's probable devel- opment. 147. Our evidence also continues to support the existence of one or more other proto- types of new or improved long-range bombers. Past experience cautions that existing pro- totypes may represent competitive designs. The Soviets may not yet have evaluated such prototypes in relation to each other or to " See SNIE 11-58, "Possible Soviet Long Range Bomber Development, 1958-1962," 4 March 1958 (SECRET) , and SNIE 11-7-58, "Strength and Composition of the Soviet Long Range Bomber Force," 5 June 1958 (TOP SECRET) . For esti- mated performance characteristics of Soviet long-range bombers for operational use to 1961, see Annex, Table 6. their missile programs. Such evaluation will have an important bearing on the future strength and composition of Long Range Aviation. 148. We continue to project Soviet heavy bomber and tanker strength for mid-1960 as lying within the range of 100 to 200 air- craft. The high side reflects a Soviet option to produce additional aircraft of BISON and perhaps BEAR types, and perhaps to intro- duce a few of a new heavy bomber into op- erational units. The low side reflects their option to forego a further build-up in heavy bombers through mid-1960, relying primarily on their one-way medium bomber capability against the US for at least a little longer. Our estimates of trends in Long Range Avia- tion beyond 1960 are more uncertain, but reflect our belief that the USSR will prob- ably introduce new or improved interconti- nental bombers during the period of this estimate. Should Soviet planners desire a large force of heavy bombers and tankers, there is no question that they could have five or six hundred BISONs, BEARs, and new heavy bombers in units by mid-1963. As indicated in the table below, however, it seems to us more likely that the heavy bomber and tanker force will remain con- siderably smaller than this?say, about two or three hundred, including some of new types. 149. Intercontinental ballistic missiles. We believe that Soviet planners intend to acquire a sizable ICBM operational capability at the earliest practicable date. However, we have insufficient evidence to judge the magnitude and pace of a Soviet program to produce SOVIET LONG RANGE AVIATION (Estimated Strength in Operational Units) HEAVY BOMBERS 1 Oct 58 Mid-1959 Mid-1960 Mid-1961 Mid-1962 Mid-1963 AND TANKERS 100- 125 100- 150 100- 200 150- 250 200- 300 200- 300 MEDIUM BOMBERS AND TANKERS Jet 950 1,025 1,100 1,100 900 800 Piston 400 300 150 TOTALS 1,450-1,475 1,425-1,475 1,350-1,450 1,250-1,350 1,100-1,200 1,000-1,100 TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 39 and deploy ICBMs. Considerable preparations for a build-up of operational ICBM capabilities could already have been made without detec- tion by intelligence, as implied by Khru- shchev's recent statement that the production of ICBMs has been "successfully set up." In the light of such indirect evidence as exists, we have considered those factors which would affect an operational ICBM build-up, includ- ing the Soviet capacity to produce missiles and associated equipment, and concurrently to complete launching facilities, establish logistic lines, and train operational units. 150. Taking into account the complexities of the tasks which would have to be accom- plished, we believe that the Soviets could achieve an operational capability with 500 ICBMs 17 about three years after first opera- tional capability date. Based on our estimate that a first operational capability will prob- ably be achieved in 1959, we therefore be- lieve that a capability with 500 ICBMs could be achieved some time in 1962. With over- riding priority and exceptional success in the test and production program, this capability might be achieved in as little as two years after first operational capability date, i.e., some time in 1961. Assuming a build-up in three years from first operational capability to a capability with 500 ICBMs, a capabil- ity with 100 ICBMs 18 would be achieved in about a year and a half; assuming a two year build-up, 100 would be achieved in about a year. The achievement of operational ca- pabilities such as these within the time periods estimated would require an extremely high order of planning and accomplishment, and would also require an increase in the average rate of ICBM firings for test and training purposes. 151. There is evidence that mobility is an important consideration in Soviet ballistic missile development generally. For an ICBM system a degree of mobility could be obtained by use of rail transport to previously pre- " " These numbers of ICBMs are selected arbitrar- ily in order to provide some measure of the Soviet production and deployment capacity; they do not represent an estimate of the probable Soviet re- quirement or stockpile. pared launching sites, some of which would have only a minimum of fixed equipment. This would provide flexibility and security through the use of relatively simple alternate launching sites which would be difficult to identify and locate. Our estimate of the So- viet capacity to acquire ICBM operational capabilities, given in the preceding paragraph, applies to either a rail-transportable system or a system of moderately hardened fixed launching sites, or a combination of the two. 152. Other long-range ballistic missiles. The Soviets probably consider ballistic missiles of 700 and 1,100 n.m. maximum range as con- tributing primarily to their capabilities to de- liver nuclear payloads on distant, fixed tar- gets in Eurasia and its periphery, although shorter-range ballistic missiles could also be employed for this purpose within their range. We estimate that nuclear warheads would be provided for virtually all missiles of 700 and 1,100 n.m. range, but we do not exclude the possibility of CW use in some 700 n.m. mis- siles. On the basis of available intelligence, we cannot judge the present scale of produc- tion and we have not identified any units equipped with these missiles. It is possible that at present the USSR has only a very limited capability to employ them in military operations. But considering such factors as estimated Soviet requirements, nuclear ma- terials availability, and experience in shorter range missiles, we believe that the USSR may now have an operational capability with as many as several hundred ballistic missiles of 700 n.m. range, and with a few 1,100 n.m. missiles. 153. The wide availability of medium and light bombers capable of reaching Eurasian targets probably reduces Soviet requirements for missiles of these ranges. Since the 700- mile missile has probably been operational since 1956, we believe that the Soviets may meet their requirements for this missile early in the period of this estimate. A build-up in 1,100 n.m. missiles would take longer. Missiles of these types are probably designed for road or rail mobility. They are probably not deployed in Satellite areas at present, but some operational units may exist within the USSR. TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 154. Missile-launching submarines. A few conventional submarines have probably been converted for topside stowage and launching of 200 n.m. cruise-type missiles. The Soviets could convert a large number of existing sub- marines, but the problems involved lead us to believe that such conversion is not likely to be large-scale. A total of about 20 long- range submarines could be converted within 4-6 months of a decision to do so. The USSR is probably also developing one or more new types of missile-launching submarines, de- signed for internal missile stowage. These types will probably include ballistic missile submarines for first operational use in 1961- 1963, and possibly cruise-type missile sub- marines at an earlier date. If the latter are in fact developed and constructed, the USSR may have about 35 submarines, some nuclear and some conventional-powered, equipped for internal missile stowage by mid-1963. 155. Capabilities for long-range attack. Pres- ent Soviet capabilities for attack on the con- tinental US are limited by the relatively small numbers of operational heavy bombers, the requirement to stage most bombers through forward bases in the Arctic, and the lack of a substantial infiight refueling capability. Nevertheless, by employing their entire heavy bomber force, many of their medium bombers, and their small submarine-launched missile capability, the Soviets could mount large- scale initial nuclear attacks against retali- atory strengths and other war-making cap- abilities in North America. The actual weight of attack launched against the US would de- pend upon the Soviet judgment as to the optimum combination of surprise and weight of attack against all areas where US and Allied nuclear retaliatory capabilities and other essential targets are located. Against those Western capabilities deployed on the periphery of the Bloc, the Soviets could em- ploy medium bombers, light bombers, and ballistic missiles with ranges up to 700 and probably 1,100 n.m. Bombs and air-to-sur- face missiles could be employed against West- ern naval forces possessing nuclear strike capabilities. All Western targets of impor- 40 tance in North America and overseas, as well as major naval operating areas, are within range of one or more of the Soviet weapon systems described above, although most of the Soviet bombers would have to be dis- patched on one-way missions to reach targets in the continental US. 156. Soviet long-range striking capabilities will increase markedly as the stockpile of nu- clear weapons grows, improved bombers are introduced, the readiness and proficiency of the bomber force increases, and especially as the Soviet capability to deliver nuclear weapons by guided missiles expands.19 The USSR will rely increasingly upon missiles as long-range delivery systems as the period ad- vances. While Soviet planners almost cer- tainly recognize that ballistic missiles can impose maximum surprise and difficulty of interception, they probably consider that for some years the accuracy and payload capacity of such missiles will be inferior to those of manned aircraft of comparable ranges. We therefore believe that through the period of this estimate, Soviet long-range striking ca- pabilities will lie primarily in a mixed force of manned bombers (probably equipped increas- ingly with air-to-surface missiles) and ballistic missiles. The Soviets may consider that bal- listic missiles can best be employed to neu- tralize Western retaliatory and other capabil- ities temporarily in an initial blow, relying upon bombers for follow-up attacks of maxi- mum weight. In any event, effective Soviet employment of long-range striking capabili- ties against Western retaliatory and other es- sential targets will still face great difficulties of timing and distribution of attack against widely deployed, mobile, and ready Western strengths. The USSR's missile-carrying sub- marines will contribute further to its capabili- ties, but the scale of their use in an initial attack would depend upon the Soviet judg- ment of the risk of premature disclosure of intent. 19 The Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence, Department of the Army, does not concur in this sentence. See his footnote to paragraph 22 of The Summary. TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 411. Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 41. Air Defense Forces 157. All Bloc forces useful for air defense are organized for participation in an integrated system which places primary emphasis on providing defense in depth for key administra- tive, industrial, and military centers within the USSR. We believe that air defense will continue to be given high priority. 158. Air defense weapons. The principal current weapon system for defense of Sino- Soviet Bloc targets against high-altitude at- tack is the high-performance jet fighter, of which there are over 14,000 in operational units throughout the Bloc. More than 10,000 of these fighters are in Soviet units, about 4,200 of them in units whose sole mission is air defense and the remainder in units with air defense as one of their primary missions. The principal day fighter in Soviet forces is the subsonic FRESCO, although about 1,200 su- personic FARMER day fighters were in units as of 1 October 1958. Also in service are the FLASHLIGHT all-weather fighter, as well as the FRESCO "D" and FARMER "B" with lim- ited all-weather capabilities, but their intro- duction has proceeded at a relatively slow pace. Total Soviet strength in the FLASH- LIGHT and FRESCO "D" types was about 1,730 as of 1 October 1958, with some FARMER "B" types also in operational units. 159. Most Bloc jet fighters in operational units have combat ceilings of 50,000-55,000 feet; FARMER and certain FRESCO versions prob- ably have combat ceilings on the order of 60,000 feet. During 1959-1963 the USSR will probably introduce new day and all-weather fighter types, whose characteristics will em- phasize speed and altitude at the expense of combat radius. By 1962 the latest operational Soviet fighters will probably be capable of operating at altitudes up to 67,000 feet, and of climbing to 40,000 feet in less than two min- utes." Air-to-air missiles are probably now available to improve the kill capabilities of Soviet interceptors, although we have no evi- dence that they have as yet been supplied to operational units. Total numerical strength " For estimated performance characteristics of Soviet fighter aircraft, see Annex, Table 9. in fighters will probably decrease after another year or two, because of the growing destruc- tive power of individual interceptors, greater demands on industrial capacity resulting from the advent of more complex fighters, and the increasing availability and capabilities of sur- face-to-air missile systems. 160. Surface-to-air missiles designed for op- timum effectiveness at altitudes of 30,000- 60,000 feet and probably having limited effec- tiveness at 80,000 feet are now in operation in a dense and costly complex of 56 sites around Moscow. This complex, which could include a limited number of missiles with nuclear war- heads, can probably direct a very high rate of fire against multiple targets under all weather conditions. It is probably ineffective against very low altitude attack, however. We believe the USSR may have altered an earlier inten- tion to install a somewhat similar surface-to- air missile complex around Leningrad, and that the missile defenses of this and other critical Soviet targets will employ systems with greater flexibility and less cost than that at Moscow. There is now some evidence of the installation of surface-to-air missile sites in a few other key areas, such as Baku. We believe that more such sites will be built through the period of this estimate as improved systems for both high and low altitude defense become available, and that surface-to-air missiles will be provided for numerous Soviet fixed targets as well as field forces and naval vessels. Sur- face-to-air defenses in key areas will probably become effective both at very low altitudes and up to 90,000 feet during the period. 161. The Soviets continue to employ antiair- craft guns for defense of field forces and fixed targets, including airfields. More than 25,000 light and medium antiaircraft guns are be- lieved to be available to Soviet forces at pres- ent; in addition, about 5,000 are available to East European forces and nearly 4,000 to Com- munist China, North Korea, and North Viet- nam. Large numbers of automatic antiair- craft machine guns are also available to field forces. As suitable surface-to-air missiles be- come available in quantity, a large portion of the medium and some light antiaircraft guns will probably be phased out of the air defenses of static targets in the USSR. TOP. SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 162. Air defense radar and control equipment. Radar coverage now extends over the entire USSR and East European Satellite area, ex- cept for certain inland portions of central and eastern Siberia; coverage also extends along the entire coastal region of Communist China. The long-standing gaps in radar cov- erage in the Soviet Arctic are now believed to have been filled, although this deployment is probably not as extensive as in many other areas. About 1,200 heavy prime radars, pri- marily of the TOKEN type, and about 3,000 light auxiliary radars are employed in various combinations at about 1,700 radar sites in the Sino-Soviet Bloc. Under average conditions, TOKEN radars can probably detect jet me- dium bomber aircraft, penetrating at altitudes up to their combat ceilings, at distances be- tween about 80 and about 180 n.m. from radar sites. New radars of much higher quality, in- cluding radars capable of more accurate height-finding, are already in service and will probably be widely deployed during 1959- 1963.21 163. For several years the Soviets have been developing computers and other components suitable for data-handling use. The use of such equipment will have a marked effect in increasing traffic-handling capabilities, reduc- ing system reaction time, and improving co- ordination within the Soviet air defense sys- tem. For example, it is expected that data- handling equipment will increase the traffic capacity of each Soviet radar reporting site to at least 20 simultaneous tracks. We believe that an air defense system with some semi- automatic features, including a data-link sys- tem for vectoring interceptors, is being widely deployed in western USSR in association with early warning and GCI sites. This system is believed to be similar in concept to the US SAGE system, but less complex. It will prob- ably come into use throughout the USSR and East Europe within a few years. The Soviets are also introducing a new IFF system which will probably be fully operational by 1960. 164. Air defense concentrations. The areas of highest concentration of Bloc air defense 21 Estimated performance characteristics of Soviet early warning and ground-controlled intercept radars are given in Annex, Table 10. 42 weapons and associated equipment include that portion of European USSR from the Kola Peninsula to the Caspian Sea, East Germany, Poland, Czechoslovakia, and the Maritime and Sakhalin areas of the Soviet Far East. High defense concentrations are also found at some specific locations outside these areas, such as Tashkent, Novosibirsk, and Khabarovsk. The approaches to Moscow are by far the most heavily defended of these areas, including (in addition to the surface-to-air missile complex mentioned above) about 1,100 day and 275 all-weather fighters as well as about 700 anti- aircraft guns. We believe the Moscow de- fenses are a unique case, dictated by the im- portance of that area to the USSR. 165. Passive defense. Large passive defense organizations contribute to the air defense readiness of both military personnel and the civilian population. Civil defense training is a normal part of the program of DOSAAF, the Soviet paramilitary mass organization whose recruitment has been stepped up markedly in recent years. The incorporation of air raid shelters into newly constructed buildings is a program of long standing in the USSR. This program probably now affords some degree of shelter for roughly one-sixth of the urban population of the USSR, and this proportion will probably rise considerably during the pe- riod to 1963. Although most existing shelters were not designed for protection against blast from nuclear weapons, some newer building shelters are of heavier construction. It is probable that up-to-date protection is avail- able to selected elements of the government, but the general population is inadequately prepared against large-scale nuclear attack. 166. Air defense capabilities. Present Soviet air defense capabilities against attack by air- craft and cruise-type missiles can be sum- marized in general terms as follows: (a) Against penetrations conducted during daylight and in clear weather, at altitudes be- tween about 5,000 feet and about 45,000 feet, capabilities are greatest. (b) At altitudes above about 45,000 feet, capabilities would decrease progressively as altitude increased, except in the limited areas equipped with surface-to-air missiles where TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 43 capabilities would be unimpaired to at least 60,000 feet. (c) At altitudes below about 5,000 feet, capabilities would decrease progressively as altitude decreased, and would probably be seri- ously reduced at altitudes below about 1,500 feet. (d) Against penetrations conducted at night and under conditions of poor visibility, the capabilities of the system would be greatly reduced because of the limited availability of all-weather fighters and surface-to-air mis- siles. (e) Against varied penetration tactics uti- lizing altitude stacking, diversionary maneu- vers, decoys, and electronic countermeasures, the capabilities of the system would be dimin- ished through disruption and saturation. 167. The amount of warning time available significantly affects the capabilities of air de- fenses in various areas of the Bloc. Early warning radar could now give Moscow and many other targets in the interior more than one hour's warning of attacks made with pres- ent Western bomber types. The more limited early warning time available in Bloc border areas would reduce the effectiveness of the de- fenses of even heavily-defended targets in such areas. As the speeds of Western delivery ve- hicles increase, the problem of warning time will become more critical, despite probable So- viet employment of picket ships, airborne ra- dar and other extensions of warning capa- bilities. 168. Over-all Bloc capabilities against aircraft and cruise-type missiles will increase, however, through improvements in the performance characteristics of most Soviet air defense equipment and especially through the wide employment of semiautomatic air defense con- trol. Air defense guided missile capabilities will increase. Higher-performance fighters will be employed, and the proportion of all- weather fighters in Soviet forces may increase to about 60 percent. But the Soviets will con- tinue to have difficulty in opposing very low altitude attack and air defense electronic sys- tems will still be subject to disruption and saturation. The USSR will probably not have an operational weapon system with even lim- ited effectiveness against ballistic missiles un- til the very end of this period or later. Ground Forces and Tactical Air Forces 169. The Soviet ground forces represent the largest part of the Soviet military establish- ment and are closely supported by tactical aviation, consisting of fighters trained in the ground attack role (in addition to their air defense role) and light and medium bombers trained in ground support bombing tech- niques. These forces are well-balanced, ably led, and equipped for the most part with ex- cellent materiel of modern design. Units are distributed among 17 military districts in the USSR and three groups of forces in the Euro- pean Satellites. The strongest concentrations are in East Germany, the western and south- ern border regions of the USSR, and the Mari- time area of the Soviet Far East. Stockpiles maintained in these areas are believed suffi- cient to support large-scale ground combat operations for several months without replen- ishment from current production. 170. The order of battle of Soviet Army ground forces is estimated at about 175 line divisions plus supporting units. These divisions prob- ably average about 70 percent of authorized wartime strength, although the manning level in some interior districts may be as low as 30 percent. All units probably have a high proportion of authorized officer strength, how- ever, and full equipment is believed to be kept locally available. These peacetime manning practices, together with standard conscription and stockpiling programs, would probably en- able all Soviet line divisions to be brought to full strength by M+ 10. Conversion to a war footing could be executed rapidly, and about 125 additional line divisions could be mobilized by M+30. 171. There has been an extensive program over the last several years to modernize and reorganize the Soviet ground forces to meet the requirements of modern warfare. More advanced designs of practically all types of equipment have appeared. The firepower of individual units has been increased markedly, additional vehicles (including amphibious ve- TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 44 hides) have been provided, and communica- tions equipment has been augmented. 172. A reorganization in the Group of Soviet Forces, Germany, during 1957 produced a new type of Soviet line division?the motorized rifle division?which appears well-adapted for fast, hard-hitting action. The mechanized divisions were converted to the new motorized type by removing heavy tank and assault gun units, and the rifle divisions were converted by addition of medium tanks, armored per- sonnel carriers and rocket launcher. During the same period a resubordination of divisions resulted in the creation of "tank armies" com- posed exclusively of tank divisions to provide for rapid, deep exploitation in enemy rear areas. The other units remain grouped into "combined arms" armies, now composed of motorized rifle and tank divisions. We be- lieve that similar developments have been un- der way since 1956 throughout the Soviet ground forces. 173. These changes are in line with revised Soviet tactical doctrine which emphasizes the need to supplement standard ground force tactics and training in order to meet the con- ditions of nuclear warfare. New doctrine stresses firepower, mobility and maneuverabil- ity, greater initiative, deeper objectives, inten- sified reconnaissance and the protection of individuals and units against the effects of atomic and chemical weapons. It also envis- ages the tactical use of nuclear weapons in support of Soviet field force operations. 174. Surface-to-surface ballistic missiles with ranges of 100 n.m., 200 n.m., and 350 n.m. have probably been available for operational use since 1954. We believe these missile types are intended for mobile use in support of field forces, and for attacking fixed targets such as air bases. Depending upon operational consid- erations and the availability of nuclear war- head materials, nuclear, HE, or CW warheads could be employed. We have only a small amount of evidence of military units equipped to launch ballistic missiles, and it is possible that at present the Soviet capability to em- ploy them in military operations is quite small. On the other hand, the Soviets have had experience in producing missiles in the 100-350 n.m. range class, probably have an extensive production capacity, and have had ample time to train troops in their use. Very recent evidence indicates that Soviet missile units equipped with 100 n.m. missiles may have been deployed to East Germany. It is possible therefore, that the USSR's present operational capability in the 100-350 n.m. range class comprises as many as several thou- sand missiles, although in view of other So- viet requirements for nuclear materials it is unlikely that many would be equipped with nuclear warheads at present. Missiles of these types may now be held in the high com- mand reserve, but as their availability in- creases they will probably be organically as- signed to field armies. Some 700 n.m. missiles may also be allocated to the support of Soviet field forces. 175. Air support for ground operations is pro- vided mainly by Tactical Aviation, the largest single component of the Soviet air forces. Its units are assigned to the military districts and groups of forces. Tactical Aviation has ac- quired at least some nuclear delivery capabil- ity. It is now equipped (as of 1 October 1958) with jet aircraft estimated to include about 4,700 fighters and 2,800 light bombers. The fighter units are predominantly equipped with FAGOTs and FRESCOs; however, the more advanced FARMER day fighter and FLASH- LIGHT all-weather fighter are also in service. Tactical bomber units are still equipped with the obsolescent BEAGLE, although a few units have received BADGER jet medium bombers. Prototypes of several new fighter types and two new jet light bombers have been displayed since 1956, but none of these aircraft has been identified in an operational unit. 176. The increasing availability of nuclear weapons and guided missiles during 1959-1963 will bring further changes in equipment and organization of Soviet ground and tactical air forces and a steady improvement in their ca- pabilities. We believe that these changes will be evolutionary in nature, and do not antici- pate any major alterations in size or deploy- ment. While nuclear weapons and guided missiles probably will be used in support of tactical operations, conventional field artillery and unguided rockets will continue to provide the major direct fire support for units in close TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET combat. Tactical Aviation will probably re- ceive new supersonic fighters and bombers, but both fighters and bombers are expected to decline in numbers as increasing reliance is placed on guided missiles. 177. The USSR has sizable airborne forces, estimated at 10 divisions and a total strength of about 100,000 men. Airborne troops are well-equipped, but the air transport compo- nent has lagged far behind combat air units in the Soviet aircraft re-equipment program. Aviation of Airborne Troops now comprises approximately 500 light transports of the CAB, COACH, and CRATE types, 200 BULL medium bombers converted to transport use, 200 helicopters and 200 gliders. This strength could be augmented substantially by other military and civil transports. 178. The appearance of new transports and air-transportable equipment indicates that the USSR is now paying increasing attention to the development of its airborne forces. So- viet airlift capabilities will probably increase considerably during 1959-1963 as additional helicopters and transports are introduced. The BULL will probably be employed as an interim medium transport until late in the period, when it will have been replaced by the CAMP twin-turboprop assault transport (which has, however, not yet appeared in units) and possibly other advanced types. Better auxiliary transport will also become available as improved aircraft are introduced into civil aviation. In 1957, a number of new transports were displayed, including the CAT and COOT turboprop medium transports, a four turbojet transport designated COOKER, and a turboprop heavy transport, the CLEAT. Of these aircraft, only the COOT is now in service, and there is some evidence that tech- nical difficulties have caused the transport program to proceed more slowly than previ- ously estimated.22 Capabilities for Major Land Campaigns 179. Soviet ground forces are capable of con- ducting large-scale operations on several 22 For estimated performance characteristics of Soviet transport aircraft, see Annex, Table 8. 45 fronts into peripheral areas, separately or con- currently. These operations could be sup- ported by the large available air forces, but the high priority assigned to air defense would limit the availability of fighter aircraft for such support operations in the initial phase of a general war. Surface naval vessels, naval aircraft and submarines would be available for operations in Bloc coastal areas in support of ground campaigns. The logistic environment is an important limitation on these capabili- ties, and the capacities of military transporta- tion systems have been considered in the fol- lowing estimates of Soviet offensive capabili- ties against selected land areas. These esti- mates do not take into account the effects of an initial nuclear exchange, of direct Western opposition to advancing Soviet forces, or of Western interdiction of essential logistic lines. Moreover, these are not estimates of the num- bers of divisions the USSR would consider it tactically feasible or necessary to employ in the areas discussed. 180. Against Western Europe and Scandi- navia. Without prior build-up, Soviet forces in East Germany and Poland could initiate an offensive campaign into Western Europe with 22 line divisions, half tank and half motorized, supported by about 1,400 tactical aircraft. To augment the strength of the initial attacks, a maximum simultaneous airlift of two lightly-equipped airborne divisions of 7,500 men each could be mounted by Aviation of Airborne Troops based in Western USSR. If approximately one-half of the civil transport aircraft normally in the area also participated in the airlift, the equivalent of an additional 2-3 divisions could be lifted in a one-day op- eration. However, we doubt that the Soviets would risk loss of strategic surprise by as- sembling such a large number of civil air- craft prior to an initial attack. In addition to airborne reinforcements, a maximum of four divisions could be lifted in merchant ships across the Baltic Sea. Air reinforce- ment could be drawn from the nearly 2,000 aircraft of Tactical Aviation units in West- ern USSR, and ground reinforcements from the 56 divisions in Western USSR could be brought up rapidly. Lines of communication through the northern satellites are estimated TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 46 to be capable of supporting a theoretical logis- tic maximum of about 160 divisions. 181. Soviet campaigns to seize Norway and Sweden could be launched from northwestern USSR through Finland and from west central Europe through Denmark. Forces immedi- ately available in northwestern USSR consist of nine line divisions and about 2,600 tactical and naval aircraft. Operations against Nor- way would be limited logistically in the north to four divisions over Finnish land routes plus one water-borne division, and in the south to a maximum of five divisions water-lifted from Denmark. If Sweden were also attacked, as many as six additional divisions could be moved across Finland and a maximum of nine divisions could be ferried from Denmark to southern Sweden. Additional reinforcements might be water-lifted across the Baltic from the USSR to Sweden, and airborne forces could be used in securing debarkation facili- ties. 182. Against Greece, Turkey, and the Middle East. Forces available for operations in this area include 44 line divisions and 2,750 tacti- cal and naval aircraft in southern and south- western USSR. For operations west of the Black Sea, lines of communication would be adequate to support as many as 10 divisions against Greece or as many as 16 against Tur- key, but not more than a total of 22 could be supported concurrently. At most, 14 of these divisions could be supported in an extension of this campaign into northwestern Anatolia, while seven divisions from the Caucasus could move against eastern Turkey. Three addi- tional divisions could be water-lifted to the northern Turkish coast, provided that port facilities could be secured. One or two air- borne divisions could be employed in the area. Lines of communication could support a force of 15-20 divisions in offensive operations- against Iran. 183. In the Far East. The USSR has 31 line divisions, approximately 2,350 tactical and naval aircraft and sizable naval forces avail- able in this area. These forces could renew hostilities in Korea, either alone or in conjunc- tion with North Korean and Chinese forces. One airborne division could be employed against Japan. A seaborne force equivalent to three lightly-equipped divisions could be launched against Japan, using a mixed group of ships and other craft. Provided port facil- ities could be secured, fully-equipped forces equivalent to 5-6 divisions could be landed al- most immediately in a follow-up operation. The same technique could be used in other areas of the Far East within range of land- based aircraft. Adverse climate, terrain and logistic environment would probably limit op- erations in Alaska to one airborne division and a seaborne force of about 6,000 troops. Naval Forces 184. During the postwar years, Soviet naval forces have been greatly strengthened by an intensive building program concentrated on light cruisers, destroyers and submarines. The Soviet submarine force is the largest ever assembled by any single power; over half of its present strength consists of long-range craft of postwar design and construction. Due to a recent slow-down in the naval con- struction program, which included a tempo- rary halt in submarine production, there has been little quantitative change in Soviet naval forces since last year. We estimate Soviet naval strength as of 1 October 1958 at 28 cruisers, about 140 destroyers and 80 destroyer escorts, and about 440 submarines. These totals include vessels of postwar design num- bering 20 light cruisers, 110 fleet destroyers, 80 destroyer escorts, about 260 long-range sub- marines (18 "Z," 4 "F," and 237 "W" class) and about 35 medium range submarines ("Q" class). They are grouped in four major forces: the Northern Fleet, located in the Barents Sea area; the Baltic Fleet; the Black Sea Fleet; and the Pacific Fleet, concentrated largely at Vladivostok. 185. The surface forces are supported by So- viet Naval Aviation, which comprises more than 15 percent of total Soviet air strength and is now the second largest naval air force in the world. Approximately 3,200 aircraft are assigned to the Soviet fleets, including about 1,750 fighters, 600 jet light bombers, 250 jet medium bombers and nearly 700 mis- cellaneous types. The combat aircraft are the TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET same types as are assigned to Tactical Avia- tion: FAGOTs, FRESCOs, FARMERs, FLASH- LIGHTs, BEAGLEs, and BADGERs. We be- lieve that selected naval bomber units have been assigned an atomic delivery role and there is evidence of a developing air-to-surface missile capability in naval BADGER units. Lack of aircraft carriers limits the operational effectiveness of Soviet Naval Aviation to the combat radius of its shore-based aircraft. 186. The operating efficiency and equipment of Soviet naval forces, while still below US standards in some fields, are quite high and will continue to improve. The great increase in world-wide unidentified submarine contacts in recent years probably reflects the intensified training of the Soviet submarine force, par- ticularly in long-range operations. In the naval weapons field, in addition to the develop- ment of submarine-launched guided missiles, the Soviets have vigorously pushed the produc- tion of more effective mines with magnetic, acoustic and pressure actuated firing devices. We estimate that the USSR has stockpiled mines of advanced types as well as conven- tional mines. It is technically capable of adapting nuclear warheads to mines, torpedoes and depth charges. Nuclear tests in the No- vaya Zemlya area have probably included the testing of naval weapons. The Soviet Navy has become increasingly aware of its initial failure to keep pace with the rapid postwar technological advances in antisubmarine war- fare. In recent years there has been a steady improvement in its ASW tactics and equip- ment and a major effort has been made in the construction of escort ships in order to overcome this deficiency. The Soviet Navy is also quite limited as to amphibious capability. To meet the lift requirements of divisional- size units the USSR would have to rely almost exclusively upon merchant ships. 187. Several important developments in Soviet naval forces are likely during 1959-1963 as a result of changing weapon systems and new concepts of naval warfare. In addition to conversion of some submarines for the launch- ing of surface-to-surface missiles, new sub- marines specifically designed for this purpose probably will enter service. Some Soviet 47 cruisers and destroyers will probably be equipped with dual-purpose surface-to-air/ surface-to-surface missiles. Nuclear propul- sion will be applied to submarines, and im- provements in submarine hull design are ex- pected early in the period. We believe that antisonar coatings have probably been applied to some Soviet submarines. To meet the threat from US missile-launching submarines, the USSR probably will continue to emphasize improvement of its antisubmarine warfare capability. This could include construction of new and better antisubmarine vessels in- cluding "killer" submarines, use of specialized aircraft and helicopters, development of im- proved detection systems (both sonar and ra- dar) and more sophisticated antisubmarine weapons including guided missiles. Naval Aviation will probably receive aircraft of im- proved performance as they become available, as well as improved air-to-surface missiles. 188. Submarine construction. The USSR will probably continue to place primary em- phasis on submarines in its naval construction program. Since 1950 the Soviets have built about 290 submarines of the medium-range "Q" class and the long-range "W" and "Z" classes.23 Construction of "Z" class subma- rines ended in 1955, but the "W" class and "Q" class programs continued into 1957. Their termination probably marked the initia- tion of new submarine programs. A new class of conventionally-powered long-range subma- rine has been in production at Leningrad since the beginning of 1958. This class (designated "F") is apparently a torpedo-attack type, larger than the "Z" class and with improved sonar. Four "F" class submarines are be- lieved to have reached operational status. Additional submarine programs believed to be under way include a nuclear-propelled type and submarines specifically designed to em- ploy guided missiles. 189. Although the evidence is not firm, we believe that the USSR may already have com- missioned one or more nuclear-powered sub- marines. Soviet capabilities in this field have 23 For estimated characteristics and performance of these submarines, see Annex, Table 12. TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 48 been indicated by the development of the icebreaker Lenin, which will probably become operational in 1959. The Lenin is powered by three nuclear reactors of a type which would be suitable, with some redesign, for use in a submarine. We estimate that by mid-1963 the USSR will have about 25 nuclear-powered sub- marines. 190. Construction of conventional submarines will probably continue but, because of the greater complexity of nuclear-powered and missile submarines, annual submarine produc- tion almost certainly will not reach the high levels of recent years. Considering such fac- tors as the decommissioning of obsolete boats, the possible conversion of some additional sub- marines to missile use, and the development of new propulsion and weapons systems, we esti- mate that the total force will approximate 470 submarines in mid-1963. 191. Capabilities for naval warfare. A grave threat to Allied naval forces and merchant shipping is posed by the Soviet submarine force, which is about eight times the size of the submarine force with which Germany entered World War II. In the event of war, Soviet submarines could conduct intensive operations against Allied sea communications in most of the vital ocean areas of the world. Mining could be undertaken on a large scale and would constitute a serious threat to Allied sea communications. This threat is greatest in waters relatively close to Soviet-controlled air and naval bases, but Soviet submarines pro- vide a distant minelaying potential of major proportions. Soviet Naval Aviation could at- tack Allied naval forces, shipping and port facilities within range using bombs, mines, tor- pedoes and air-to-surface missiles. Soviet Long Range Aviation probably would also con- duct attacks on naval targets, but its partici- pation at the outset of a war presumably would be limited to missions of the highest priority. Although the primary threat to Al- lied naval forces in the Atlantic, the Pacific and the peripheral seas of Eurasia would come from Soviet submarines and aircraft, the sur- face navy would play a role in preventing at- tacking forces from operating with impunity close to Soviet shores. Naval exercises of the last several years, stressing defense of the sea approaches to the USSR, indicate a strong defensive capability in the fleet operating areas. 192. The Northern Fleet, with more than 100 long-range submarines and direct access to the open Atlantic, is considered the most formid- able of the Soviet fleets. Northern Fleet sub- marines could deliver attacks throughout the North Atlantic and the large "Z" class sub- marines could operate in the Caribbean. So- viet seizure of Norway would greatly extend the submarine and air offensive capability of this force. The geographic position of the Baltic and Black Sea Fleets limits their offen- sive capabilities. Seizure of the Baltic exits would allow the Baltic Fleet submarine force to join in the interdiction of Allied sea com- munications in the North Atlantic and would increase the potential of Baltic Fleet surface forces for operations in the North and Nor- wegian Seas. Similarly, seizure of the Turk- ish Straits would permit submarines of the Black Sea Fleet to range throughout the Medi- terranean and threaten Allied sea communica- tions in that area. Submarines from both the Baltic and Black Sea Fleets might also be de- ployed outside of home waters prior to the ini- tiation of hostilities. Aircraft and subma- rines of the Soviet Pacific Fleet could attack Allied sea communications in the North Pacific and adjacent Far Eastern waters from the out- set of hostilities. 193. The capabilities of Soviet naval forces will improve steadily throughout this period with the acquisition of more advanced subma- rines, aircraft, and naval weapons. The prin- cipal weaknesses of the USSR as a naval power will continue to derive from the wide separa- tion of its sea frontiers and its inability to control the sea routes between these areas, although improvements in inland waterways will increase its ability to interchange smaller vessels including submarines. The lack of adequate supply lines to its Northern and Far Eastern fleet areas and the land-locked posi- tion of its fleets in the Baltic and Black Seas are additional handicaps. TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 49 V. TRENDS . IN SOVIET RELATIONS WITH OTHER COMMUNIST STATES 194. The USSR's relations with other Bloc states continue to be of pressing concern to the Soviet leaders. During the past year Mos- cow has moved energetically to repair the damage done to its political control and ideo- logical authority by developments of the last several years. To this end, it sponsored an international Communist conference ? her- alded as the most significant in more than 20 years ? broke the three-year old rapproche- ment with Yugoslavia, ordered the execution of Imre Nagy, held a dual CEMA and Warsaw Pact meeting in Moscow, and began publica- tion of an international Communist periodical designed to replace the defunct Cominform journal. The Moscow conference of Commu- nist parties in November 1957 produced a codification of nine fundamental Marxist- Leninist "laws" to which all true (Soviet- oriented) "socialist" states must adhere. It was the signal for an intensified drive against "revisionism" calculated to inhibit departures from the approved norms by member parties, especially those which might be infected by the spirit of nationalism. 195. These efforts have been intended to cope with what has become one of the fundamental problems in the Communist world: how to preserve ideological conformity and political unity. The Communist parties in the various states are confronted with quite diverse local conditions in "building socialism:" they are tempted to resort to practical expedients which have no counterpart in Soviet experi- ence and require ideological justification in terms close to "deviationism." In addition, as parties now possessing state power they are bound to think in terms of their own state interests, not always identical with those of the Soviet state, and to show some deference to the national sensitivities of their peoples. Consequently, there are present within the Communist parties elements and factions which harbor latent or open resentment of Moscow's domination, and they are strength- ened by the knowledge that within the gen- eral population anti-Soviet sentiment con- tinues to be vigorous and widespread. 196. The tradition of the Communist move- ment took little account of localist proclivities or the autonomy of national parties; it was "internationalist" and centralist. This tend- ency was enormously reinforced during the period of Stalin's ascendancy. He rose to un- disputed mastery of the Soviet party at a time when other Communist parties were weak and had little prospects of attaining power. His organizational controls, his unquestioned ideo- logical authority made him as much the abso- lute dictator over them as he was in the USSR itself. Only the Chinese Communists, iso- lated in the interior reaches of China, estab- lished organizational and even some degree of ideological autonomy. In the postwar period, after the Communist parties gained power in Eastern Europe and China, Stalin had become a towering historic figure in the Marxist- Leninist hierarchy. Even where Moscow had other and more direct means of control over Satellite parties, its authority rested to a con- siderable degree on the magic of Stalin's name and myth. Only the Yugoslays challenged his authority and survived the assault of the whole Communist world, though they had to pay the price of exclusion. The Chinese, al- though able to go their own way, nevertheless accepted the ideological authority of Stalin. 197. Stalin's death left a legacy in Eastern Eu- rope of inefficient maladjusted economies and of hatred for Soviet domination; Moscow's ideological and organizational control was crippled. The confusions resulting from divi- sions within the Soviet leadership, Moscow's modification of Stalin's oppressive controls and policies, the attempts to redefine ideologi- cal positions under new conditions, and the partial repudiation of Stalin himself contrib- uted to factionalism in the Eastern European parties and facilitated the overt expression of latent popular hostility to Soviet domination. Communist China, which initially at least ap- peared to view with sympathy the desire of TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 50 some Satellite regimes for greater local au- tonomy, emerged as a second ideological cen- ter within the Bloc. Since the events of 1956 in Poland and Hungary, the Communist lead- ers of all Bloc states, including especially the Chinese, have presumably recognized that the interests of all in the struggle against the non-Communist world depend upon preserv- ing unity on essential issues. In Communist terms a necessary means of enforcing such unity is conformity to ideological programs. This was the point of the 12-party pronounce- ment of November 1957 and subsequent in- sistence on ideological conformity. 198. On the surface, unity has been restored and the leading position of the USSR has been re-emphasized. But the unity of ideological program was achieved by collective discussion in which at least some of the parties evidently played an independent role, however heavy may have been the weight of Soviet views in the final outcome. We believe that the front of unity ? both ideologically and in terms of state policy on the international stage ? will be effectively preserved for some time. But over a longer period the divergence of state interests and the need to develop policies in accordance with local conditions and nation- alist sentiments will tend increasingly to dilute Moscow's control over the Communist Bloc. Relations with the Satellites 199. The Soviet approach to the European Satellites during the past year represents, in essence, an attempt to synthesize the post- Stalin trend toward greater autonomy with the post-1956 efforts to re-establish the sta- bility of the Bloc structure. While this has meant renewed emphasis on Soviet hegemony, it has not led to a general resumption of police terror, nor has it involved an abandonment of Soviet economic aid and equitable trade rela- tions. Further, the Soviet leaders ? though now playing down the possibility of "many roads to socialism" ? still concede limited freedom of action to Satellite leaders and tol- erate certain divergencies ? in the case of Poland substantial ones ? based on differing internal conditions. 200. The Soviet leaders thus appear to retain their belief that Stalinist methods were in- efficient and dangerous; even if they should want to return to Stalinist policies toward the Eastern European Satellites, the example of Communist China's relative independence and the special position of Poland would make such a move exceedingly difficult. The Soviet lead- ers still have not discovered any definitive answers to the basic questions concerning intra-Bloc relations: How best to reconcile the contradictions between a policy toward East- ern Europe which is at once "soft" (designed to insure the Satellites economic and political growth) and "hard" (intended to guarantee stability and Soviet overlordship) ; and how best to adjust to the changes since 1953 in the USSR's position as Bloc leader. 201. With the exception of Gomulka in Po- land, and possibly Kadar in Hungary, all of the Satellite leaders have responded with vigor to the Soviet call for ideological con- formity and fealty to the USSR. Needing no encouragement to combat "revisionist" trends, they have been able to thwart those elements which have sought basic reforms. Moreover, their efforts to assure internal security have been successful; there has been no serious threat to the stability of any of these regimes during the past year. 202. Popular hostility to the Communist sys- tem and to the USSR has probably not been reduced, however, although there may have been some diminution in public resentment in countries where there has been a gradual im- provement in living standards. Popular un- rest does not appear to be an immediate prob- lem except in Poland, where it still could lead to strikes and riots, and in East Germany, where continuing emigration to West Ger- many reflects active discontent and remains a seemingly insoluble problem. 203. Prospects. A continuation of the current pattern of Soviet policy toward the Satellites for the next few years is probable so long as outside events or developments within the Satellites themselves do not force a change. In general, the USSR is likely to limit its direct interference in Satellite affairs as much as it believes feasible, striving to give these TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 51 regimes the appearance of full sovereignty. Most of the orthodox Satellite leaders will probably be allowed to exercise day-to-day control over internal affairs, provided they re- tain control over their own parties and con- form to Soviet-established guidelines. The fact that these leaders depend on Soviet sup- port for their position and share many of the same interests tends to reduce the risk for the USSR in such a policy. The apparent right of Bloc leaders to speak relatively freely and frankly to the Soviets about their own problems and about intra-Bloc economic af- fairs will probably be maintained, although this right is undoubtedly viewed in Moscow solely as a consultative one. The renewed Soviet effort to push Bloc economic integra- tion and to achieve a better division of labor will receive continuing emphasis. But past resistance to this program, based on the na- tional economic interests of the individual Satellites, has been stubborn and persistent and will almost certainly not be eliminated over the next few years. 204. We believe that the recurrence of popular revolt or of an attempt by a Satellite Commu- nist party to defy Moscow on vital issues is unlikely at least over the next few years. Such developments are possible, however, and even probable if Soviet policies should again be- come indecisive, or if, because of Soviet in- ternal or foreign policy considerations, con- trols should be significantly relaxed. In the event of a rebellion in the Satellites beyond the capacity of the local regime to repress, the Soviet leaders would almost certainly inter- vene militarily. Soviet reaction to an attempt of a Satellite to secede from the Bloc would probably be the same. In the event of an- other Satellite party "coup" like that in Poland ? aimed at greater autonomy rather than secession ? the Soviet response would be dependent on the particular local and inter- national circumstances of the moment. One of the aims of the current "antirevisionist" campaign is to prevent any disaffected inner party faction from organizing a challenge to the official leadership. 205. We believe that the Soviet Union will al- most certainly maintain or increase its efforts to reduce or eliminate the distinctive features of the Polish regime. But, since Gomulka would almost certainly resist pressures on any fundamental aspects of his policies and would have the support of the Polish people in doing so, we think that the Soviet approach will be cautious. If moderate pressure proves ineffec- tive, however, the USSR might work for Gomulka's ouster. Even in this case, we think that the USSR would resort to military intervention only if developments in Poland were likely to jeopardize the political or mili- tary security of the Bloc.25 206. Concerning East Germany, the Soviet leaders will almost certainly continue their campaign to build up the GDR as an ostensi- bly sovereign power. Internally, the political and economic weakness of the East German regime will continue to pose major problems for the Soviets. Attempts to give greater stability to the GDR through more liberal in- ternal policies would involve political risk and would probably require greater economic sub- sidy from the Soviet Union, something the Soviet leaders would be reluctant to give. On the other hand, turning up the screws to en- force popular submissiveness and to make the GDR more economically self-dependent has led to the mass flight of key professionals, and may lead to other serious losses. Thus the Soviet tactical approach to the GDR regime will probably continue to show signs of vacil- lation and uncertainty. Bloc Relations with Yugoslavia 207. Concern over their position as Bloc leader and prime center of Communist doctrine, and fear that the acceptance of Yugoslavia as a non-Bloc Communist power was at least potentially a serious danger to that position, were probably the principal causes of the So- viet leaders' decision to break off the rap- prochement with Yugoslavia. The Soviet effort to re-establish close relations With Tito in the summer and early fall of 1957 was aimed at inducing Yugoslavia to identify itself with the Soviet camp. When it became clear ? as it evidently did at the Interna- 25 See NIE 12.6-58: "The Outlook in Poland," dated 16 September 1958. TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18 CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 52 tional Communist conference in Moscow in November 1957 ? that Tito was unwilling to so align himself on Soviet terms, the break in the rapprochement was probably inevitable. The appearance of the "revisionist" Yugoslav Party program the following spring probably only helped to shape the nature and timing of the subsequent Soviet campaign. 208. For the foreseeable future, the USSR is unlikely to attempt any essentially new ap- proach to its Yugoslav problem. The tenor of the Bloc anti-Yugoslav campaign, however, will probably vary somewhat with time and place, the greatest weight being given to it by Albania, Bulgaria, and Communist China. Moscow evidently does not intend to resume the program of development credits for Yugo- slavia and will probably also hamper the nor- mal flow of trade from time to time, while denying that these measures are intended as economic sanctions. Though it wishes to exert pressure on Yugoslavia in order to dis- courage independence-minded and revisionist elements in Poland and the other European Satellites, it is fearful that dramatic anti- Yugoslav measures would do real harm to Soviet relations with the uncommitted na- tions. However, the USSR will continue its attempts to discredit Yugoslav foreign policy, particularly in the Middle East and Asia, and will try to link Tito with the colonial powers in the minds of Afro-Asian leaders. Relations with Communist China 209. Communist China over the past several years has emerged as a nearly-equal partner of the USSR within the Communist world. The preponderant influence is still in Mos- cow, but this appears to operate through dis- cussion and persuasion rather than by the exercise of authority or control. The founda- tions of the alliance remain unimpaired: a common ideology, which charts the broad course of domestic developments and posits hostility toward the capitalist enemy; a mu- tual dependence, economic and military in the case of China, political and strategic in the case of the USSR; and a shared realiza- tion that any major disruption of the alliance would probably have catastrophic effects on the future of the entire Communist movement. We thus believe that the bases for the Sino- Soviet partnership are compelling, that the two regimes will remain closely allied over the period of this estimate, and, indeed, that neither regime is likely to believe that it could afford a break even if serious divergencies arose. 210. We also believe, however, that there are certain differences between them which have perforce led to compromises or which have been glossed over. Such divergencies are more likely to grow than to diminish over the next few years and we believe that because of them, and because of its growing power and prestige, the Peiping regime poses a potential threat to the kind of Sino-Soviet Bloc which the Soviet leaders would like to envisage for the future. Although the USSR will retain its senior posi- tion, it is possible that the process of reconcil- ing differences between the two may increas- ingly involve compromises on the part of the USSR, with corresponding adjustments in Soviet policy. 211. Possible Chinese Communist differences with the USSR in policy or tactical ap- proach ? but not ultimate goals ? have in- cluded the doctrinal innovations of 1956 and 1957 concerning the "100 flowers" concept and the possibility of "contradictions" between the party and the masses; and the apparent sentiment in 1956 that the USSR had over- played its role of Bloc leader and was, in fact, guilty of "great power chauvinism." At present Peiping and Moscow may view rela- tions with the West somewhat differently; the Chinese Communists appear to be more mili- tant than the Soviets and less fearful of the consequences of a "high risk" policy. In addi- tion, there have been differences at least in propaganda emphasis concerning various in- ternational questions. 212. In the future, areas of friction may arise from the general question of Communist China's influence as an ideological and politi- cal force within the Bloc as a whole. The unprecedented Chinese organization of "com- munes" must be a development ideologically embarrassing to the Soviets, since it implies that the Chinese are advancing toward Corn- TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 53 munism more rapidly than the Soviets them- selves. There may also be Soviet concern over a Chinese tendency toward "adventurism" in pushing for Communist advances, and over the role to be played by Communist China in those areas of the Far East where it has in- dependent interests. Thus far these matters do not seem to have occasioned serious dif- ficulty, although even if they had every effort would certainly be made to conceal the fact. Peiping has been in the forefront in proclaim- ing Soviet leadership of the Bloc, the USSR has acknowledged Communist China's high place in Bloc councils and its ability to make independent contributions to Marxism-Len- inism, and to date Sino-Soviet interests in the Far East apparently have not clashed. 213. Problems associated with Sino-Soviet eco- nomic and military relations could also lead to friction. However, Soviet aid programs have apparently gone forward on the planned scale, and there is no evidence that the Chinese have sought more aid than they are getting; Pei- ping's desire for more assistance probably has been counterbalanced by its wish to limit the degree of its economic dependence. The ques- tion of nuclear weapons may be a delicate one; the Chinese have presumably sought them from the USSR, or will do so. The USSR is probably reluctant to supply them because of unfavorable repercussions on the Soviet dis- armament position, the attendant loss of So- viet leverage over Communist China, and the potential military risks involved. We believe that nuclear weapons have not been given to China, but that the Soviets may make them available in the future under some form of Soviet control. 214. In sum, we believe that Communist China will attain over the next several years an increasing influence on general Bloc policy and Communist ideology. The Soviet leaders themselves are almost certainly aware of this likelihood and probably view it with concern. Moscow will wish to retain its pre-eminent position in the Bloc and, to the extent that it fears the eventual emergence of an actual rival, will attempt cautiously to minimize Pei- ping's influence within the Bloc. On the other hand, Peiping's growing stature strengthens the Bloc both internally and externally and in this respect is welcome in Moscow. More- over, both partners recognize the importance of solidarity to over-all Communist objectives and realize that mutual adjustments are in- evitable consequences of the alliance. TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 54 VI. TRENDS IN SOVIET FOREIGN POLICY Introduction?The Current Conduct of So- viet Policy 216. Soviet foreign policy, over the more than five years since Stalin's death and increasingly since the consolidation of Khrushchev's per- sonal power, has acquired certain character- istics which are important to note in gauging the threat posed to US security. Though they relate more to manner than to content, these characteristics taken together are revealing as to the development of Soviet policy in re- cent years, and as to the changing assump- tions about the world situation which under- lie it. 217. Most striking perhaps has been the fact that the conduct of Soviet foreign policy has shown itself more energetic, assertive, and rapid both in response and in seizing the ini- tiative. In part, of course, this reflects the impress of Khrushchev's personal style of leadership, in part also Soviet consciousness of the USSR's growing military and economic power. But it also reflects the Soviet belief, first, that a more dynamic posture would be effective in the present world situation, and second, that the main struggle with the West lies at present in the world political arena, rather than at the military frontiers between the power blocs. Soviet policy has come to employ its propaganda weapons with greater aggressiveness and shrewdness, attempting to build the image of a "peace-loving" yet for- midable power, confident that by so doing it can effectively alter the alignment of political forces in the world. 218. Tactical and ideological flexibility has be- come another hallmark of current Soviet for- eign policy. The Soviet leaders have shown themselves willing to entertain a variety of new policies without regard to positions taken up earlier and have accommodated ideology more and more to the changing requirements of policy. Thus in 1956, in support of the tactics of peaceful coexistence, they under- took a major revision in Communist doctrine: they found that war with capitalist states was no longer "fatally inevitable." They also found it expedient to abandon Stalin's rigid division of the world into the socialist camp and the capitalist encirclement; instead of assuming that all countries beyond the Bloc were tools of world imperialism, they came to discriminate various shades of political align- ment, even among allies of the US. 219. There has also been an extension of the scope of Soviet foreign policy. There are no longer any neglected areas in the world as there were in Stalin's time. Since 1955 the Soviet leaders have taken major initiatives in the Middle East, and have become far more active in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. The Soviet press frequently tells its readers that no longer can any issue in the world be resolved without taking account of Soviet views. Doubtless there is an element of prop- aganda bravado for domestic consumption in this, but it also reflects an increasing disposi- tion to regard the USSR as now one of two great world powers, and therefore entitled to have global concerns. In situations of crisis everywhere there has been a tendency to put forward the Soviet view assertively and to refer to the factor of Soviet military power in a more blunt fashion. 220. Finally, Soviet conduct is marked by an apparently high and genuine confidence. The Soviet leaders evidently believe that, despite the many and serious problems which face them, the movement of events increasingly justifies their long-held hopes for the ultimate triumph of "world socialism" under Soviet leadership and tutelage. This mood probably reflects satisfaction with Soviet economic and scientific advances, and with the growth of Soviet military power, as well as gratification over the sharpening difficulties for Western interests in certain areas of the world. While we do not conclude that the Soviet leaders are so overconfident that they would be tempted to incautious behavior, this is one TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 55 of the hazards which might attend any strik- ing new advance of Communist power or reversal for the West. Current Soviet Objectives and Main Lines of Policy 221. How do the Soviet leaders view the out- look over the next several years and what are the immediate objectives which they consider feasible to pursue in moving toward an ex- pansion of Communist power? In broad terms, they probably believe that there is an accelerating trend toward enhancement of the world power position of the Communist Bloc and a corresponding decline in that of the US and its allied states. This is the traditional view which springs from Marxism-Leninism, but which they will see as confirmed recently by their own gains in economic power, their weapons advances, and the sharp political disturbances in the non-Communist world. At the same time, they appear to believe that the strength of the Western states continues to be formidable and that it should not be frontally challenged. 222. Consequently, the main strategy of Com- munist policy continues to be that of reducing the Western power position by gradualist means and enhancing that of the Bloc. The Soviet leaders probably list their principal objectives over the next few years as follows: (a) reinforcing the unity of the Communist Bloc and pushing rapidly its growth in mili- tary and economic power; (b) encouraging political divisions within the non-Communist world, particularly with a view to isolating the US and constricting the deployment of its military power and the extent of its political influence; (c) seizing whatever opportunities may offer for alignment of non-Communist states with the Bloc, and, where expedient, for outright territorial expansion of Communist power. 223. The means which the Soviet leaders in- tend to employ in pursuing these objectives are various. As indicated, they will of course push the actual expansion of their own eco- nomic and military power base as rapidly as they can. They see this as the foundation of their policy. But they will also use all the means at their command to make it widely believed that Communist power is great and growing, that in some important respects it already outpaces the West, and that the fu- ture belongs to their kind of society and their power system. To project this image of them- selves and of the world situation they will press the programs they have developed in recent years: an active diplomacy, a large- scale propaganda effort, trade and aid, and cultural exchanges. 224. Attitude toward war. We believe that at least for the period of this estimate the Soviet leaders will continue to put their main reliance in the struggle with the West on such political weapons. Despite the con- tinuing growth of their military power, in particular their acquisition of growing ca- pabilities for nuclear attack on the US, we con- tinue to believe that they will not deliberately initiate general war. They will probably es- timate that even with a lead in long-range missiles, they could not be certain of winning a general war, and that the scale of damage in such a war would threaten the survival of their society. 225. In the Soviet conception, military power should be used in the first instance and by preference as a political weapon. The enemy should be maneuvered into such a vulnerable military-political situation that he forfeits key positions without military resistance. Actual use of military power is envisaged only if there is confidence both that the gains will outweigh the losses, and that the risks are acceptable. Therefore, the immediate ques- tion posed by the growth of Soviet military power is whether the Soviets will be increas- ingly tempted over the next several years to use the threat of their military power more overtly and boldly as a means of pressure on the West. 226. Another serious question arises from the increasingly aggressive conduct of Soviet foreign policy on the one hand and the con- tinuing growth of Soviet military power on the other: will the Soviets employ their own or other forces controlled by them in local military actions, estimating that the US will TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 A Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 56 be deterred from making an adequate mili- tary response by fear of general war or of adverse political consequences? 227. National Estimates have stated consist- ently over the last several years that the So- viet leaders would try to avoid general war and that they would seek to avoid situations which in their view involved serious risk of general war. We believe that this estimate can be reaffirmed. However, we also believe that the Soviet judgment with respect to the kind of situations which do involve serious risk may be changing. The advance of their \ own military power, together with the grow- ing political vulnerability of key Western po- sitions, will probably lead the Soviet leaders to increase their general pressure on the West and to exploit local situations more vigor- ously. While we have always considered it possible that Bloc forces would be used in overt local aggression if this could be done without much risk of serious involvement with Western forces, we do not believe that the likelihood of such aggression has in- creased. However, we do believe that the So- viets will combat more actively than hitherto the presence of Western influence in con- tested areas, relying upon threats to prevent the West from taking counteraction to pre-) serve its influence. In this sense, we believe that there is currently a tendency on the , part of the Soviets to view the risks of a more aggressive policy as less serious than in the past. This tendency could be reversed as a result of Western actions or as the result of a change in the Soviet leadership. But so long as this tendency persists we believe that the danger of war by miscalculation will be increased. At present, we believe that this danger is somewhat greater than our esti- mates in recent years have indicated. 228. A posture for "peace." Even if Soviet political warfare does become more vigorous and increasing pressure is applied against the West, Soviet policy will continue to garb it- self with the slogans of "peace." It will not go over to an overtly and frankly ag- gressive posture. Rather it will continue to present itself as still striving for "peaceful coexistence" and as leading the "struggle for peace." The Soviet leaders recognize that the world-wide fear of war is so intense that great political strength is added to that side in the power struggle which can capture the force of this sentiment, and thus align large bodies of opinion with its own cause. Identification of the USSR with hopes for peace and the US with war and aggression will remain a prin- cipal aim of Soviet propaganda strategy. 229. To some extent, the desire to maintain the plausibility of this posture imposes in- hibitions on the use of force; this is one reason for regarding open aggression by Bloc forces across state frontiers as unlikely. In general, Soviet leaders, believing they can con- tinue to reap rewards with their "coexistence" tactics with little risk, are likely to view open military aggression as politically undesirable and unnecessary. Instead it will be their aim to create, mainly by political means, situations in which the West must either concede a Communist advance or resort to the use of force under unfavorable circum- stances. Western concessions could then be construed by Soviet propaganda as bowing to the Soviet deterrent. If the West elected to use force, it would be compelled to do so under political and perhaps military handi- caps. In either case, the Soviets would ex- pect to intensify divisions within free world alliances and to align the uncommitted more closely with the Communist camp. 230. The Soviets will probably continue also to display an apparent readiness to engage in direct negotiations to settle outstanding is- sues. Proposals for high level talks will prob- ably be renewed at any juncture the Soviet leaders find favorable to themselves. They will regard such meetings as primarily of a demonstrative character,, intended not to re- sult in freely negotiated settlements, but rather to force the Western Powers under pressure of world opinion to accede to Soviet- proposed formulas. They will attempt to pose the alternatives of "peaceful coexistence" on the one hand, or of tensions bringing a rising danger of nuclear war on the other, hoping by occasional measured reminders of the latter to stimulate acceptance of the former on Soviet terms. TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 57 231. The underdeveloped countries in Soviet strategy. The effort to align the USSR in apparent support of broadly held popular as- pirations takes its most general form, other than in peace propaganda, in identification with various "national liberation movements." People in underdeveloped countries are being told that the USSR champions peace, progress, and national independence, while the West stands for war, reaction, and colonialism. Moscow clearly sees the underdeveloped coun- tries?with their weak economic and political systems, strong nationalist and anticolonialist sentiments, neutralist tendencies, and resent- ment at past and present domination by Western European countries?as the most susceptible ground for expansion of Soviet in- fluence at Western expense. It is this calcu- lation which underlay the Soviet attack in recent years on Western interests in the colonies and former colonial countries of the Middle East, Asia, and Africa. 232. In part this campaign is intended to deny resources and bases in these areas to Western use. But the Communists have ap- parently come to believe also that it is pre- cisely in underdeveloped and colonial areas that the best prospects for Communist ad- vances now lie. At a minimum, they hope to bring national movements and states in these areas under Soviet diplomatic and economic influence. By thus entering into what in cur- rent Soviet parlance is called the "zone of peace" these peoples would enhance the weight of the Bloc in the world political balance. At a maximum, the Soviet leaders hope that anti-Western national movements can with native Communist participation be given a gradually more radical complexion, a process which would result ultimately in the estab- lishment of Communist or Communist-con- trolled parties in power. They anticipate that rising expectations in these areas will far out- run the possibilities of fulfillment, thus giving the Communists a chance to seize the revolu- tionary initiative. We believe that the effort to capture a dominant position in underdevel- oped areas of the world will continue through the period of this estimate to be one of the main preoccupations of Soviet policy. 233. The USSR's targets among the underde- veloped countries may shift considerably dur- ing the period under consideration, in ac- cordance with changing opportunities and local Communist successes and reverses. Frictions between Moscow and Afro-Asians will tend to arise in many countries?as they have already arisen in some instances?as the first bloom of friendly cooperation wears off. Moreover, the basic rationale for Moscow's present collaboration with most Afro-Asian countries?their common anti-Western orien- tation?may even be somewhat eroded as some of the current points of difference between the rising nations and the former imperial powers diminish. At the same time, Moscow will seek out new areas for the expansion of its political and economic influence, par- ticularly in Latin America and Africa. In those countries where its efforts are most successful, the USSR may increasingly be tempted to resort to more direct means, that is, support of local Communists in attempts to seize power. But the Soviets would care: Lu_lly weigh such gains against tlfe?harrntur consequences such a policyl ineyitably evoke elsewhere. 234. Trade and aid. Soviet trade and aid programs are the economic adjunct to the strategy of penetration in underdeveloped areas. The underdeveloped countries, many of which are also politically uncommitted, are generally receptive to Soviet offers of aid and offer the prospect of high political gains in return for comparatively small economic investment. Rather than being widely dis- persed, aid has been concentrated on coun- tries which are especially susceptible to So- viet influence and also in most cases are of political or strategic interest to the West. 235. From January 1954 to June 1958 the USSR extended approximately $1.2 billion in credits to underdeveloped countries in the free world, of which $300 million has already been used. Credits and grants by other Bloc coun- tries bring the total to more than $2 billion, of which $1.3 billion has been obligated and $740 million has been expended. About three- fifths of the total Bloc credits expended have been in the form of arms deliveries to Syria, TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET Egypt, Yemen, Afghanistan, and Indonesia. These same countries plus Ceylon, India, Burma, and Cambodia have received the ma- jor part of the economic aid. During the first half of 1958 there were at one time or another an estimated 3,700 Bloc technicians (including military specialists, totaling about one-third of this number) in 17 underdeveloped coun- tries, representing an increase of more than 50 percent over the preceding six months. In magnitude these programs are relatively small compared with Western efforts on a global basis, and the burden they impose on the Soviet economy is slight, annual expendi- tures thus far being only a few tenths of one percent of Soviet national product. 236. Attitude toward the UN. To the extent that the Soviets succeed in gaining influence over the policies of underdeveloped and neu- tralist countries, and as the number of Afro- Asian members increases, the UN will become a more attractive forum for them. They probably expect ultimately to find issues on which they can align majorities against the US and obtain endorsement of Soviet policies. They calculate that such a demonstrative iso- lation of the US would disturb US-allied rela- tions and curtail US influence in many areas. If the UN then became an issue in US domes- tic politics, the repercussions abroad would compound the Soviet advantage. We believe that the Soviets consider the chances for polit- ical warfare victories within the UN frame- work to be sufficiently promising so that they will continue to give that body major atten- tion. 237. Disarmament. The Soviet leaders evi- dently believe that by showing an active inter- est in disarmament they can enhance their claim to leading in the cause of peace. More specifically, they hope to neutralize Western nuclear striking power by intensifying the stigma attached to nuclear weapons and thus inhibiting their actual or threatened use by the West. They may also believe that dis- armament negotiations can help to reduce the chances of nuclear war. They will almost cer- tainly, when circumstances seem to them ap- propriate, press for a continuation of such negotiations. 58 238. It is possible that the Soviets will con- clude limited agreements in the field of dis- armament, even if these involve some limita- tions on their own military capabilities, in order to gain what they would consider to be a net advantage. Probably they have not yet resolved on the precise shape of agreements which would meet this prescription. We be- lieve that their deep suspicion of the West and their aversion to extensive inspection in the USSR will forbid their acceptance of any truly comprehensive disarmament scheme, and will make negotiations on even the most limited measures highly complicated and drawn out. Soviet Policy in Particular Areas 239. The Middle East. This area has offered since 1955 the most striking example of the attempt by Soviet policy to support anticolo- nialism and nationalist movements against Western interests and influence. The USSR did not create the Arab nationalist movement, but in providing the political backing of a great power, together with substantial mili- tary and economic assistance, it has enor- mously increased the power and effectiveness of the movement. 240. The immediate Soviet aim is to deny this area to the West and to expand Soviet influ- ence there, rather than to gain direct control of it. If Soviet policy can deepen the con- flict between Arab nationalism and the West to the point of irreconcilability, several results follow: closer association of Arab states with the Bloc tends to alter the world political alignment in the latter's favor; Western mili- tary bases in the Arab states are eliminated; Western control of the oil resources becomes tenuous. Consequently, we believe that So- viet policy will continue to present itself in the Middle East as the friend and supporter of Arab nationalism in the latter's struggle against Western "imperialism," and more par- ticularly, will for the present support Nasser as leader of the Arab nationalist movement. Further military and economic assistance will be made available to the United Arab Repub- lic; UAR positions on Jordan, Lebanon, the Aden Protectorate, and other trouble spots in- volving Arab-Western conflict will be sup- ported in Soviet propaganda and in the UN. TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 241. The Soviet leaders probably believe that at some stage the Arab nationalist movement can be given a revolutionary turn toward Com- munism and brought under Soviet control. They believe that a sharpening of the Arabs' conflict with the West, to which their propa- ganda and Communist subversive elements in the area can contribute, will facilitate this development. To the extent that such a rev- olutionary turn towards Communism actually takes place, the basic incompatibility of Soviet aims with those of the present leaders of Arab nationalism, whom the Communists regard as "bourgeois nationalists" playing a transient historical role, will emerge. Communist pene- tration and subversion of the nationalist move- ment may occur unevenly in different Arab countries and the Soviets may at some point be tempted to abandon their restraint and en- courage a Communist takeover in some key Arab state, provided they consider the stakes high enough to compensate for the resulting damage to Moscow's relations with other Afro- Asian neutrals. 242. Insofar as Western influence is elimi- nated from the area the Soviets will seek to reduce Nasser's pretensions and to make him increasingly their prisoner. They will try to deny him the opportunity to pursue a truly neutralist policy in which he tries to keep lines open to both power blocs. They will seek to displace his influence over other Arab states with their own and to prevent the consolida- tion of Arab unity under his aegis. They will oppose his suppression of local Communist parties and try to bring these into the open as leaders of the nationalist movement. There are already some signs, in Iraq for ex- ample, that the Soviets are opposing Nasser's leadership of the Arab nationalist movement in these ways. We believe, however, that they will be extremely cautious in their efforts to undermine-Nasser and, before moving openly against him, will await a time when they be- lieve that the local Communists have captured control of the mass movement or when Nasser has so isolated himself from the West that he can no longer hope to get its support against the Soviets and the Communists. An open conflit_betwenNasserism and Communist- e)sp.o,nsienism-seems unlikely in the immediate 59 future, but it might develop during the period of this estimate. 243. The Soviet leaders must be aware that the Western Powers are bound to attach the high- est importance to the protection of their inter- ests in the Middle East. How do they evalu- ate the possibility that their pledges of sup- port to the leaders of the Arab nationalism, who cannot be fully controlled by them, may entrain the USSR in situations of great risk? Developments in the area over the past few years have probably led Moscow to place con- siderable confidence in the growing effective- ness of a Soviet deterrent against Western use of force to overthrow an Arab government friendly to the USSR. The Soviet leaders probably also believe that the Western Powers in most instances would be restrained from such action by the unfavorable political re- actions that would follow, both in the area and in the neutralist countries throughout Asia and Africa. Nevertheless, the intervention of the US and UK in Lebanon and Jordan dem- onstrated that there are circumstances in which Western powers would be willing to use military force. If the Western Powers became involved in conflict in the area, the Soviet leaders would probably not engage Soviet forces openly or take other actions which in- volved in their view serious risk of expanding hostilities. However, we believe that the Mid- dle East is one of the areas where the danger of war by miscalculation has increased. 244. While Soviet policy in the Middle East is not aimed primarily at military gains, the Soviet leaders probably view the developing situation there as offering opportunities to build potential military assets. They un- doubtedly calculate that in the event of So- viet military operations in this area they would benefit from their earlier peacetime introduc- tion of military technicians, Soviet type weap- ons, fuel and materiel, from their increased capabilities for espionage and subversion, and from the improvements which have been made in local airfields, harbors and other facilities. The Soviet leaders probably also contemplate the eventual achievement of a long-sought Russian goal?land access to the strategic areas of the Middle East. To this end, they TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET 60 will continue to encourage and support such movements as that for an independent pro- Soviet Kurdish state and for a pro-Communist government in Iraq, and will also continue pressures against Iran and Turkey. 245. Asia. The USSR will probably rely on its current policies?propaganda about the successes of Communism, support of national independence against Western imperialism, and offers of trade, aid, and cultural ex- change?to sustain and deepen neutralism, promote pro-Soviet alignments, and gradually to erode Western influence in Asia. Further increase in the strength of the Communist parties in Indonesia and India might induce the Soviet leaders to switch to open support of them, but it is more likely, in the case of India at least, that for the next several years Soviet policy will find greater advantage in cultivating the existing governments. In Asia, it is probably these two countries which are of primary interest to Communist policy at present. 246. Policy toward Japan will probably con- tinue along the routine line laid down over the last several years?propaganda to stimulate Japanese neutralism, disturb Japanese-Ameri- can relations, and maintain pressure for denial of bases to the US. The Soviet leaders prob- ably do not believe that they have the means to alter the situation in Japan in any impor- tant way for the present. Likewise, they prob- ably regard the situation in Korea as stale- mated, although they will continue to agitate for withdrawal of US forces. 247. Soviet policy in Southeast Asia appears to operate jointly with that of Communist China on the principle of shared influence. The Soviets will probably continue to give pri- mary emphasis to cultivating closer relations with neutralist governments in the area. They will maintain their effort to disrupt SEATO and to align uncommitted states with the Sino-Soviet Bloc on all broad international issues. They will also stress their willingness to extend economic aid to the Southeast Asian states and will tout the value of Communist methods as the best way to achieve the eco- nomic development these countries so desper- ately seek. However, we believe that, should favorable opportunities arise and should they estimate that the gains would outweigh the losses, the two Communist powers might sup- port a local Communist party in an attempt to seize power. At present, Indonesia or Laos seem the most likely places for such a development eventually to occur. 248. Africa. As part of its effort in the underdeveloped areas, the USSR will almost certainly increase its activities in Africa dur- ing the next five years. It is already develop- ing diplomatic and economic relations with the newly independent states of Morocco, Tunisia, and Ghana, and is devoting some- what greater efforts to Libya and the Sudan. It has offered trade, aid, technical assistance and, in some cases, arms. Although Soviet policy is somewhat constrained by the desire not to appear to compete too obviously with Nasser in the primarily Arab and Moslem areas in which he hopes to extend his influ- ence, the USSR will almost certainly expand its efforts to establish its diplomatic and eco- nomic presence on the continent, to encour- age nationalist and anticolonial movements, and to attempt to end the exclusiveness of Western influence in most of the area. 249. Up to the present the USSR has followed a policy of restraint toward North Africa, largely out of regard for Soviet relations with France and for the position of the French Communist Party. At some point, however, the USSR may abandon this policy. Internal developments in France or in Algeria might convince the Soviet leaders that they would gain more from open support of North African nationalism. In any case, material support may be given to the Algerian nationalists, though probably through Egypt rather than directly. Arms and economic aid offers will probably be pressed on the Tunisian and Moroccan Governments. 250. Western Europe. Current Soviet policy in Europe appears to be aimed more at con- solidating the USSR's position in Eastern Eu- rope than at an early expansion of Soviet power beyond the present frontiers of the Bloc. In order to achieve greater security for Communist control of Eastern Europe, as well as to weaken the position of Western Europe, TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 M-E#T SECRET 61 the Soviets are bound to regard the dissolu- tion of the NATO alliance and the withdrawal of US military power from Europe as basic objectives of their policy. These are the main purposes of all their maneuvers and proposals aimed at achieving "European security." The more immediate Soviet objectives are to pre- vent an increase in West German military strength and the establishment of additional missile bases in Western Europe. Soviet dis- armament policy and its attendant propa- ganda is directed largely at these targets. Moreover, the Soviet policies in the Middle East, Asia, and Africa, apart from their in- trinsic importance, are themselves calculated to impose material and political losses on Western Europe and to encourage divisions there. 251. The current Soviet diplomatic offensive over the status of Berlin is the most striking example of Khrushchev's activist foreign policy. The Soviet leader must be aware that there is virtually no point of controversy be- tween East and West on which the West has so thoroughly committed itself, and that there can scarcely be a more dangerous interna- tional issue to push to the point of crisis. In raising the issue, the Soviets have had in mind the achievement of a number of major objectives. They seek to compel the Western Powers to deal with East Germany and thus to accord at least tacit recognition to the GDR. This in turn would constitute an im- portant step toward a ratification of the status quo in Eastern Europe, a development which the Soviets have long sought. Further, the removal of the Western presence from Berlin would permit the Soviets to handle the escapee problem and generally to reinforce the inter- nal security of their East German Satellite. They probably further calculate that the Ber- lin initiative, even if only partially successful, will stimulate a more receptive atmosphere for other Soviet proposals on Germany, par- ticularly disengagement and peace treaty ne- gotiations. In addition, the Soviets probably expect that a serious Western retreat on Ber- lin would bring into question for many West Germans the desirability of the NATO al- liance. 252. It is not clear why the Soviets have chosen the present moment to raise the Ber- lin issue, but their action is certainly in ac- cord with the generally hardening tone of their foreign policy. This in turn is related to their growing conviction, manifest over the last year or so, that their relative power posi- tion has improved. They are presumably act- ing on the assumption that what they de- scribe as "a shift in the relation of forces in the world arena" in their favor gives them an opportunity to test the solidarity of the Western Alliance over a major issue. The Soviet leaders probably intend to be cautious and tactically flexible. We believe that they will try to direct Soviet and East German maneuvering in a manner which will avoid military conflict with the Western allies, while at the same time they will be prepared to take advantage of any signs of weakness on the part of the West, or of inclinations to compromise on major issues. Neverthe- less, they have already committed themselves considerably, and we believe that the crisis may be severe, with considerable chance of miscalculation by one or both sides. 253. We do not believe that the raising of the Berlin issue signalizes a Soviet willingness to move toward a settlement of the German problem as a whole on other than Soviet terms. We foresee no change at present in the USSR's adamant opposition to German reunification despite the handicaps this im- poses on Soviet maneuverability in Western Europe. The Soviet leaders cannot contem- plate abandonment of East Germany because of the threat which would probably develop to their whole position in Eastern Europe, beginning with Poland. Over the longer run, a major political change in West Germany, such as might develop after the death of Chancellor Adenauer, could lead to a new and seemingly more flexible Soviet and East Ger- man approach to Bonn and to the reunifica- tion problem. The Soviets probably believe that a period of political uncertainty would ensue, and that party realignments would give them new opportunities to promote West Germany's separation from NATO and the withdrawal of Allied military forces, to achieve SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 SECRET international recognition of East Germany, and eventually a reunification scheme ac- ceptable to the USSR. 254. Moscow probably has come to view the Communist Parties in Western Europe more as a vehicle for propaganda and agitation than as the basis for revolutionary action, at least for the next several years. While the long-range subversive and political poten- tial of these Parties will be cultivated, their present role is mainly to support Soviet for- eign policy objectives, such as arousing popu- lar concern against West German nuclear armament and the stationing of missiles in Europe. 255. Latin America. The trend noticeable in the last year of increased Soviet attention to Latin America will continue during the coming five years. The USSR apparently esti- mates that current economic and political 62 differences between the US and Latin America and the elements of political instability in certain countries provide a promising op- portunity to expand Soviet influence. In the immediate future, Moscow will concentrate on broadening its diplomatic and cultural relations and on trade or eaonomic assistance offers in selective, politically sensitive situa- tions in order to expand Soviet influence on the governmental level and to facilitate both the overt and the subversive activities of local Communists. The most significant recent Soviet economic moves in Latin America have been the conclusion in October 1958 of a $100 million credit to Argentina for the pur- chase of Soviet petroleum equipment (the largest Soviet credit offer extended to any non-Communist country outside the Afro- Asian Bloc) , large-scale Soviet purchases of Uruguayan wool, and the conclusion of a barter deal with Brazil. --T-aed3- SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 SECRET ANNEX Tables of Sino-Soviet Bloc Military Forces SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 SECRET TABLE 1 ESTIMATED ACTUAL STRENGTH OF BLOC ACTIVE MILITARY PERSONNEL, 1 October 1958 ARMY GROUND FORCES AIR FORCES (Including Naval Aviation) NAVAL FORCES AIR DEFENSE CONTROL AND WARNING MILITARIZED SECURITY FORCES TOTALS (Excluding Security) USSR (Rounded totals) 2,650,0002 835,000 2 a 765,00024 75,000 400,000 4,325,000 EE Satellites (Rounded totals) 880,000 100,000 40,000 300,000 1,020,000 Albania 25,000 1,500 900 10,000 27,400 Bulgaria 110,000 16,000 6,200 30,000 132,200 Czechoslovakia 170,000 23,000 45,000 193,000 East Germany 75,000 8,000 12,000 45,000 95,000 Hungary 100,000 5,500 35,000 105,500 Poland 200,000 34,000 5 12,000 45,000 246,000 Rumania 200,000 13,500 9,200 60,000 222,700 Communist Asia (Rounded totals) 3,230,000 105,000 55,000 35,000 3,390,000 Communist China 2,625,000 87,0000 48,000 2,760,000 North Korea 334,000 20,000 7,000 361,000 North Vietnam 270,000 250 2,000 35,000 272,250 BLOC TOTALS (Rounded) 6,750,000 1,050,000 850,000 75,000 750,000 8,725,000 Figures in this table are based on estimated order of battle. Estimates of this type yield approximate rather than precise measures of strength at any given time, and can lag considerably behind changes in actual strength. These figures do not include ground, naval, and air forces personnel permanently assigned to the air defense forces (PVO) with air- craft control and warning as their primary duty. For purposes of this table, an estimated 110,000 Naval Aviation personnel are included in total Soviet air forces personnel strength. Does not include KGB naval forces which in this table are carried in Soviet security forces total. Includes 2,000 naval air. Includes 8,000 naval air. SECRET 63 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 SECRET TABLE 2 ESTIMATED STRENGTH OF BLOC GROUND FORCES IN LINE DIVISIONS, 1 OCTOBER 1958' Rifle Divisions Mechanized Divisions Motorized Rifle Divisions Tank Divisions Airborne Divisions Total Country No. TOE Actual No. TOE Actual No. TOE Actual No. TOE Actual No. TOE Actual No. USSR 2 75 13,335 8,850 40 15,415 9,800 27 13,150 9,300 23 10,630 8,300 10 9,000 7,000 175 Communist China 114 17,600 15,000 3 7,850 6,000 3 8,300 7,000 123 East Germany 5 12,500 6,000 2 10,500 6,000 Poland 5 11,500 8,000 7 14,000 10,000 2 11,500 7,000 14 Bulgaria 9 11,500 5,500 9 Czecho- slovakia 8 11,500 7,000 4 14,000 8,000 2 11,500 7,000 1 6,000 4,000 15 Hungary5 0 Rumania 12 11,500 8,000 1 14,000 8,500 1 11,500 9,000 14 North Korea 18 10,700 9,600 18 North Vietnam 14 12,640 10,250 14 TOTAL 255 52 32 33 14 389 6 1 Actual strengths of divisions vary. The figures shown represent estimated averages. = Additional Soviet combat units are estimated to include 20 artillery divisions, 80 antiaircraft artillery divisions, and 120 separate brigades. Estimated dispositions of Soviet line divisions: Occupied Europe, 25; Northwestern USSR, 9; Western USSR, 56; Southwestern USSR, 20; Southern USSR, 24; Central USSR, 10; Soviet Far East, 31. The total of Chinese Communist divisions includes 3 small cavalry divisions. The Hungarian Armed Forces not now considered to be effective; ground force in process of formation will amount to some 4 divisions. ? Estimated breakdown by major groupings: USSR, 175; Communist China, 123; European Satellites, 59; North Korea and North Vietnam, 32. SECRET 64 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 'f -fe Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 SECRET TABLE 3 ESTIMATED ACTUAL STRENGTH OF BLOC AIR UNITS, 1 OCTOBER 1958 to MID-1963 FIGHTER MID-1958 MID- 1959 MID- 1960 MID-1961 MID- 1962 MID-1963 USSR E.E. SAT CCAF NVAF NKAF USSR USSR USSR E.E. SAT CCAF NVAF NKAF USSR USSR E.E. SAT CCAF NVAF NKAF Jet (Day) 8,415 2,165 1,930 7,930 6,950 5,600 2,910 1,920 4,410 3,380 2,715 1,805 Jet (A/W) 1,730 70 60 2,370 3,200 4,150 610 580 4,890 5,520 835 765 Prop - 10 35 - - - - - - - - - ATTACK Jet (Ftrs) 325 35 300 - - - - 30 - - Prop - 560 70 - - - - - - - LIGHT BOMBER Jet 2,875 170 540 2,650 2,440 2,270 270 880 2,100 1,930 275 875 Prop - - 165 - - - - - - - - - MEDIUM BOMBER/TANKER Jet 1,325 - - 1,475 1,675 1,725 - 60 1,575 1,475 - 60 Prop 435 - 20 300 150 - - 60 - - - 60 HEAVY BOMBER/TANKER Jet & Turboprop 100 to - - 100 to 100 to 150 to - - 200 to 200 to 125 150 200 250 300 300 TRANSPORT Jet (Med) - - - 5 5 5 - - 20 20 - - Prop (Lt) 1,670 105 210 1,465 1,455 1,440 165 330 1,440 1,400 175 330 Prop (Med) 190 - - 275 330 360 - 15 405 440 - 40 HELICOPTERS Light 355 25 90 - - - - - - - - - Medium (Large after 1958) 10 - - 595 715 735 130 115 735 735 210 185 RECONNAISSANCE Jet (Ftrs) 65 30 40 - - - 150 75 - - 150 105 Jet (Lt Bmrs) 490 10 20 410 395 375 40 90 360 345 40 140 Prop 145 80 10 175 220 225 30 10 225 225 30 10 UTILITY/LIAISON Jet (Lt Bmrs) 130 - - 140 140 140 - - 140 120 - \ - Prop 145 15 100 - - - - - - - TRAINER Jet (Ftrs) 765 195 200 850 850 820 280 200 810 700 285 205 ROUNDED TOTALS 19,200 3,500 3,800 18,800 18,700 18,000 4,600 4,400 17,400 16,600 4,700 4,600 SECRET 65 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 SECRET TABLE 4 ESTIMATED GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF SOVIET AIRCRAFT BY ROLE, 1 OCTOBER 1958 FIGHTER Eastern EUROPE' North- western USSR 2 Western USSR' West Central USSR 4 Caucasus USSR 5 East Central USSR' Far East USSR' Total Jet (Day) 810 1,215 2,035 1,375 1,050 535 1,405 8,415 Jet (A/W) 145 255 425 290 240 105 270 1,730 ATTACK Jet (Ftr) 90 75 ? 75 85 325 LIGHT BOMBER Jet 230 375 1,145 235 290 80 520 2,875 MEDIUM BOMBER 8 Jet ? 230 787 104 15 ? 189 1,325 Prop ? 18 159 134 42 ? 82 435 HEAVY BOMBER ? ? 40 to 50 50 to 60 ? ? 10 to 15 100 to 125 TRANSPORT Jet ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Prop (Lt) 110 180 415 375 75 40 485 1,670 Prop (Med) ?. 30 130 ? ? ? 30 190 HELICOPTER Light 20 45 100 100 5 5 80 355 Medium ? ? ? 10 ? ? ? 10 RECONNAISSANCE Jet (Ftr) 45 ? 5 ? 5 10 ? 65 Jet (Lt Bmr) 55 90 160 20 40 30 95 490 Prop (Seaplane) ? 50 10 ? 25 ? 60 145 UTILITY/LIAISON Jet (Lt Bmr) 50 20 30 ? 30 130 Prop (Misc) 40 ? 25 10 15 55 145 TRAINER , Jet (Ftr) 110 117 175 106 80 36 141 765 ROUNDED TOTALS 1,700 2,600 5,700 2,800 2,000 1,000 3,400 19,200 'East Germany, Poland, Hungary. Northern and Leningrad MD's. Baltic, Belorussian, Carpathian, Kiev, and Odessa MD's. 4 Moscow, Volga, Voronezh, and Ural MD's. 'North Caucasus and Transcaucasus MD's. Turkestan and Siberian MD's. Far East and Transbaikal MD's. Includes medium bombers assigned to Naval and Tactical Aviation. SECRET 66 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 SECRET TABLE 5 ESTIMATED DISTRIBUTION OF SOVIET AIRCRAFT BY ROLE WITHIN MAJOR COMPONENTS, 1 OCTOBER 1958 67 FIGHTER TACTICAL AVIATION FIGHTER AVIATION OF AIR DEFENSE LONG- RANGE AVIATION NAVAL AVIATION AVIATION OF AIRBORNE TROOPS TOTAL Jet (Day) 3,260 3,700 ? 1,455 ? 8,415 Jet (A/W) 665 750 ? 315 ? 1,730 ATTACK Jet (Ftr) 325 ? ? ? ? 325 LIGHT BOMBER Jet 2,390 ? ? 485 ? 2,875 MED. JET BOMBER and TANKER 115 ? 960 250 ? 1,325 MEDIUM BOMBER Prop ? ? 420 15 ? 435 HEAVY BOMBER and TANKER ? ? 100 to 125 , ? ? 100 to 125 TRANSPORT Prop (Lt) 730 110 225 140 465 1,670 Prop (Med) ? ? ? ? 190 190 HELICOPTER Light 80 ? ? 90 185 355 Medium ? ? ? ? 10 10 RECONNAISSANCE Jet (Ftr) 65 _ _ ? _ 65 Jet (Lt Bmr) 410 ? ? 80 ? 490 Prop (Seapin) ? ? ? 145 ? 145 UTILITY/LIAISON Jet (Ftr) ? _ _ ? _ ? Jet (Lt Bmr) 50 ? ? 80 ? 130 Prop (Misc) 145 ? ? ? ? 145 TRAINER Jet (Ftr) 365 280 ? 120 765 ROUNDED TOTALS 8,600 4,850 1,700 3,200 850 19,200 SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Combat Radius/Range (nm) a. 25,000 lb. _bombload one refuel 2 b. 10,000 lb. bombload one refuel' c. 3,300 lb. bombload one refuel' Speed/Altitude (kts./ft.) a. Maximum speed at optimum altitude 7 b. Target speed target altitude' Combat Ceiling (M)' Terminal Target Altitude (ft.) 8 a. 25,000 lb. bombload b. 10,000 lb. bombload c. 3,300 lb. bombload SECRET TABLE 6 ESTIMATED OPTIMUM PERFORMANCE OF SOVIET MEDIUM AND HEAVY BOMBERS For Operational Use to 1961 (Calculated in accordance with US Mil-C-5011A Spec except that fuel reserves are reduced to permit a maximum of 30 minutes loiter at sea level, and aircraft operate at altitudes permitting maximum radius/range) CURRENT MODELS POSSIBLE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT BULL BADGER BISON BEAR BADGER 19588 BISON 1958 8 BISON 19608 MB 1960-61 2600/4900 3750/7100 2750/5200 2950/5600 3500/6600 5100 3700/7000 3950/7500 1800/3300 1600/3100 1800/3400 2800/5500 4200/8100 3000/5800 3200/6300 2400/4500 2300/4200 3650/7400 5750 2400/4600 4000/7800 4300/8500 2050/3700 1800/3600 2950/5800 4400/8700 2000/3900 3100/6100 3300/6600 1950/3800 '3 2750/5000 2500/4800 3700/7800 6100 2650/5200 4150/8200 4450/8900 2650/5100? 350/30,000 550/13,200 530/18,000 495/21,600 555/14,000 540/18,800 540/18,800 1085/35,0008 310/30,000 475/40,800 460/40,900 410/41,900 475/42,300 460/43,400 460/43,400 865/47,000 8 36,500 45,400 44,000 41,200 46,700 46,500 46,500 57,500 8 52,500 48,200 54,200 54,200 41,500 50,000 52,500 61,000 54,200 50,000 55,800 55,800 42,000 51,500 54,800 51,000 54,300 56,500 56,500 62,500 Additional possible developments during the period of this estimate, for which no detailed performance characteristics have been estimated, are men- tioned in the Discussion, Chapter IV, paragraph 144. 2 Refueling estimates based upon use of compatible tankers which provide approximately 30-40 percent increase in radius/range. 8Future improvements of BISON and BADGER aircraft are based on normal expected improvements through the 1960 period; in particular, replacement of the present 18,000 lb. thrust engines with those having a thrust of about 20,500 lbs. 'Jet medium bomber with supersonic "dash" capability. 5 Capable of carrying 100 n.m. range ASM, of approximately 11,000 lb. gross weight. ?Includes 500 n.m. "dash" at Mach 1.5. 'For 10,000 lb. bombload unless otherwise indicated. 'For 3,300 lb. bombload. 'Service ceiling at maximum power with one hour fuel reserves plus bombload aboard. No range figure is associated with this altitude. SECRET 68 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 SECRET 69 TABLE 7 ESTIMATED OPTIMUM PERFORMANCE OF SOVIET LIGHT BOMBERS 1959 1950 1951 1954 1951 MADGE SUPERSONIC 4 BEAGLE MADGE ' BEAGLE BOSUN (Turboprop) Tactical Combat Radius/ Range (n.m.) 735/1,400 580/1,450 745/1,400 765/1,510 950/2,200 9002/1,6008 Bombload (lbs) 4,400 3,000 4,400 4,400 4,400 6,600 Maximum Speed at Optimum Altitude 460/15,000 165/SL 480/9,000 475/15,000 270/5,000 705 (Mach 1.23) (Kts/ft) /35,000 Target Speed/ Target Altitude 385/39,000 110/5,000 395/42,200 400/35,100 610 (Mach 1.06) (Kts/ft) /43,300 Combat Ceiling 43,800 20,200 46,900 39,500 22,000 49,400 (or 57,300 with after- burning) I May also be used in antisubmarine warfare. 'Includes 50 n.m. supersonic dash. 3Includes 100 n.m. supersonic dash. 'Expected to become operational in the 1958-1963 period. SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 iv V o Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 SECRET TABLE 8 ESTIMATED PERFORMANCE OF SOVIET TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT (Calculated in accordance with US Mil-C-5011A Spec) AIRCRAFT CAB COACH CRATE CAMEL BULL TYPE COOT CAMP CLEAT COOKER CAT TURBOJET Operational Date 1937 1947 1955 1956 1956 1958 1959 1959 1959 1959 1960 Soviet Designation Li-2 11-12 11-14 Tu-104 11-18 Tu-114 Tu-110 An-10 (Moskva) (Rossiya) (Ukraina) Power Plants Number 2 2 2 2 4 4 2 4 4 4 4 Type Piston Piston Piston Turbojet Piston Turboprop Turboprop Turboprop Turbojet Turboprop Turbojet Combat Radius/Range (n.m.) 530/1215 665/1335 710/1560 900/2050 1670/3150 1500/2800 730/1440 2500/5200 1400/2900 665/1300 1800/3800 Payload Troops or 20 21 21 60 42 110 80 230 125 125 185 Passengers or 15 18 18 50 - 75 - 120 78 84 100 Cargo (lbs) 3300 5000 4600 23,000 25,700 27,000 20,000 55,000 30,000 30,000 45,000 Speed/Op. Alt.1 165/5000 220/10,000 231/10,000 580/SL 300/20,000 410/27,000 280/17,000 500/20,000 550/13,750 400/28,000 535/20,000 (Kts/ft) Cruise Speed/Alt. 2 130/13,000 165/10,000 140/10,000 430/32,800 198/10,000 315/25,000 230/15,000 400/25,000 425/33,000 300/25,000 425/33,000 (Kts/ft) Service Ceiling 16,600 26,599 24,000 37,700 39,550 30,000 31,000 40,000 43,000 33,400 50,000 Remarks Soviet version of DC-2 Transport design based on Transport version of BULL Assault Transport called New transport based on Prototype not observed BADGER Whale by BEAR Soviets 1 Normal rated power. 'Constant altitude mission. SECRET 70 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 SECRET TABLE 9 ESTIMATED OPTIMUM PERFORMANCE OF SOVIET JET FIGHTERS' (Calculated in accordance with US Mil C-5011A Spec. except that fuel reserves are reduced to permit a maximum of 20 minutes endurance at sea level and aircraft operate at altitudes permitting maximum radius) FAGOT Day fighter FRESCO A, B Day fighters FRESCO C Day fighter FRESCO D' All-weather fighter FARMER Day fighter FLASHLIGHT A All-weather fighter FACEPLATE Day fighter All-weather fighter FITTER' Day fighter All-weather' fighter All-weather fighter Operational Current Current Current Current Current Current 1958 1958 1958 1959 1962 Maximum Speed (Kts) Sea level 580 615 635 635 680 610 700 690 800 825 800 35,000 ft 530 550 570 570 735 540 885 860 1,185 1,150 1,440 40,000 ft 525 545 570 570 725 535 850 1,150 Combat Ceiling (ft) = 51,100 55,100 59,200 58,700 61,100 49,300 61,300 60,000 60,400 62,000 67,000 with external fuel 50,800 53,400 58,600 58,300 59,700 48,700 59,100 60,000 58,300 62,000 67,000 Combat Radius (n.m.) 290 450 380 380 290 450 215 250 140 130 200 with external fuel 490 700 640 640 655 530 610 675 480 440 Time to climb to 40,000 ft (mins.) 7.6 7.3 4.7 4.7 2.6 7.8 3.8 2.6 3.5 2.2 1.7 with external fuel 8.8 10.6 6.8 6.8 7.9 8.4 6.3 5.6 5.1' Armament Guns 2 x 23mm lx 37mm 2 x 23mm 1 x 37mm s 2 x 23mm lx 37mm 3 x 23mm 2 x 23mm 1 x 37mm 2 x 37mm and 3 x 23mm and 2 x 30mm and 2 x 30mm and 2 x 30nun and Rockets 76 x 55mm or 76 x 55mm 2 x 325mm 76 x 55mm 4 x 325mm 76 x 55mm or 38 x 55mm 05 4 x 220rrirn 4 x 325mm Or 2 x 325mm or 2 x 220mm 4 x 220mm 4 x 220mm or or or Or Or or Guided Missiles 4 AAM 2 AAM 4 AAM 2 AAM 2 AAM 4 AAM ' Unless otherwise noted, performance figures are calculated with internal fuel only. Highest altitude at which aircraft can climb at the rate of 500 feet per minute with maximum power. Data shown at gross take-off weight with maximum power unless otherwise noted. 'FRESCO D and E have a limited all-weather capability (i.e., equipped with search radar, but without tracking capability) . The E version, however, has no afterburner and has about the same performance as the A and B. FISHBED, the delta-wing version of FACEPLATE, is believed to have similar performance characteristics. 'FISHPOT, the delta-wing version of FITTER, is believed to have performance characteristics somewhat inferior to FITTER's. However, it is estimated that the USSR will con- tinue to develop and improve FISHPOT as an all-weather fighter for first operational use in 1959. FISHPOT appears compatible with installation of a search-track radar. Military power (without afterburning) . SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 - 71 r, Declassified and and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 SECRET TABLE 10 ESTIMATED PERFORMANCE AND CHARACTERISTICS OF SOVIET EARLY WARNING AND GCI RADARS Year in Frequency EARLY WARNING RADAR GROUND CONTROL INTERCEPT RADAR Type Service (mcs.) Detection Range (n.m.) Altitude Tracking Range (n.m.) Altitude Coverage Medium Bomber Fighter Coverage (ft.) Medium Bomber Fighter DUMBO Current 70-75 50-140 35-85 70,000 50-110 40-75 60,000 TOKEN Current 2700-3100 80-180 70-100 60,000 80-110 50-70 80,000 TOKEN/ROCK CAKE Current 2700-3100/ 2615-2630 KNIFE REST Current 70-85 50-140 35-85 75,000 GAGE Current 2700-2800 160 100-160 80,000 GAGE/PATTY CAKE Current 2700-2800/ S-Band 70-90 40-60 80,000 BIG MESH Current S-Band 2700-3130 170-210 100-120 80,000 100-120 80-90 80,000 L-Band 550-600 170-210 100-120 80,000 STRIKE OUT Current 2700-3100 170-210 100-120 80,000 STRIKE OUT/ Current 2700-3100 100-120 80-90 80,000 ROCK CAKE New Type 1960 up to 3000 250 100-160 100,000 150 100,000 New Type 1965 up to 3000 300 100,000 250 100,000 Notes: 1. All radars listed as currently operational are believed to have height-finding capabilities, with the exception of GAGE and STRIKE OUT when used in an early warning role. 2. With the exception of DUMBO, all of these radars are believed to be equipped with antijamming devices. 3. All of these current types are believed to be mobile except for the DUMBO, the GAGE and the GAGE-PATTY CAKE combination. SECRET 72 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 t Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 SECRET TABLE 11 ESTIMATED BLOC NAVAL SHIPS 1 OCTOBER 1958 ? MID-1963 YEAR 1 October 1958 Mid- Mid- Mid- 1959 1960 1961 Mid- 1962 Mid-1963 FLEET AREA Baltic Northern Black Sea Pacific Total All Fleets Total All Fleets Sat. & Corn. Com. Corn. COUNTRY USSR Sat. USSR Sat. USSR Sat. USSR China USSR Sat. China USSR USSR USSR USSR USSR China Major Surface Ships' Heavy Cruisers 2 ? ? ? 2 2 ? 6 ? ? 5 3 1 1 1 - ? Old Heavy Cruisers ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 1 3 5 5 5 ? Light Cruisers 5 ? 6 ? 5 ? 4 ? 20 ? ? 19 19 19 19 16 ? Old Light Cruisers 1 ? ? ? 1 ? ? ? 2 ? ? 2 2 2 2 2 ? Guided Missile Cruisers ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 1 1 3 6 9 ? Destroyers 41 3 33 ? 26 1 36 4 136 4 4 145 135 120 120 118 3 Old Destroyers 3 1 1 ? 3 4 ? ? 7 5 ? 7 17 32 32 34 10 Guided Missile Destroyers ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 1 4 10 16 22 ? Escorts 12 2 19 ? 16 1 34 4 81 3 4 86 91 96 101 106 7 ? ? 53 6 76 8 252 12 8 267 275 288 302 313 Total 64 6 59 20 Submarines 2 Long Range New Construction 8 35 ? 105 ? 59 ? 56 7 255 ? 7 255 255 255 255 255 32 Long Range New Design 3 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 4 ? ? 10 20 30 40 40 0 (Nonnuclear) Other Long Range 5 ? 13 ? ? ? 2 4 20 ? 4 12 7 2 0 0 0 Old Long Range 7 ? 16 ? 3 ? 9 ? 35 ? ? 39 37 32 27 23 0 Nuclear (Torpedo) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 1 3 5 9 14 ? Nuclear (Guided Missile) 4 - - - - - - - - - - 1 3 6 9 12 ? Guided Missile (Conventional Power) ' ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 2 5 11 18 22 ? Guided Missile (Converted to Topside Stowage) Estimate 2 (W and/or Z class) now converted. Whenever decision taken to do so, estimate Soviets could convert up to 20 of this type within 4 to 6 months. SECRET 73 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 ca t 06 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 SECRET TABLE 11 (Continued) Mid- Mid- Mid- Mid- YEAR 1 October 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 Mid-1963 FLEET AREA Baltic Northern Black Sea Pacific Total All Fleets Total All Fleets Sat. & Com. Com. Corn. COUNTRY USSR Sat. USSR Sat. USSR Sat. USSR China USSR Sat. China USSR USSR USSR USSR USSR China Submarines' (Continued) Medium Range New Const. 3 33 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 33 ? ? 38 43 43 43 43 ? Other Medium Range 5 8 ? ? ? ? ? ? 4 8 ? 4 7 5 3 2 ? ? Old Medium Range 2 1 ? ? 3 ? 2 ? 7 1 ? 7 6 6 6 8 1 Short Range 5 26 6 ? ? 5 3 19 4 50 9 4 47 47 47 42 33 13 , Old Short Range 3 0 3 ? 13 3 12 1 31 6 1 29 21 12 12 19 6 Total 123 7 137 ? 83 6 100 20 443 16 20 448 452 452 463 469 52 In addition to the major surface ships shown, we estimate in mid-1958 there were 1,980 minor surface ships in the Soviet service, and 599 in the Satellites and Communist China. Minor surface ships include amphibious, mine warfare, and patrol ships. "Old" surface ships are those more than 20 years old. 2 "Old" submarines are those 14-20 years old. a Conventional submarines of post-World War II design and construction, including "W," "Z," and "F" Class long range, "Q" Class medium range, and a new medium range submarine. 'New Soviet submarine programs now under way will probably include ballistic missile submarine systems, and possibly also submarines designed for internal stowage of cruise-type missiles. While there is little evidence on the progress of such programs, the figures given here take account of both possibilities. For further information as to types, see Chapter IV, paragraph 154. 6 Submarines older than post-World War II but less than 14 years old. SECRET 74 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 LJ Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 SECRET TABLE 12 ESTIMATED CHARACTERISTICS AND PERFORMANCE OF SOVIET "Z," "W" AND "Q" CLASS SUBMARINES Length/ Displacement (tons) Diving Armament Performance ? Speed (Kts) /Endurance (n.m.) Operation Radii * Class Beam (ft) Surfaced/Submerged Limit (ft) Torpedo/Mine Surfaced Snorkeling Submerged n.m./days on station 290/26 1950/2290 650 24/48 Maximum 16/6900 11/7100 17/8.5 6600/1 (Long range) Cruising 10/17,200 8/12,400 3/108 6000/17 240/22 1300/1450 650 14/26 Maximum 15/6000 11/5100 16/8 4500/1 (Long range) Cruising 10/12,000 8/8300 4/144 4000/16 165/17 400/465 450 8/12 Maximum 16/1700 12/1300 15/7.5 1500/1 (Med. range) Cruising 4/4600 8/2500 4/144 1000/15 * These radii are based upon the following arbitrary patrol conditions: Each day of transit consists of 12 hours of surface running at 10 knots during hours of twilight and darkness and 12 hours of snorkel running during the day at 8 knots. Fuel consumption on station is based upon submerged running at 3 knots with sufficient snorkeling to maintain batteries. TABLE 13 ESTIMATED COMPOSITION OF BLOC MERCHANT FLEETS MID-1958 and MID-1963 (Ocean-going vessels, 1,000 GRT and up) Mid-1958 Mid-1963 Non-tanker Tanker Non-tanker Tanker No. GRT DWT No. GRT DWT No. GRT DWT No. GRT DWT USSR 707 2,426,308 3,089,535 95 546,768 816,039 972 3,701,620 4,657,860 141 915,718 1,369,634 EE 120 493,271 682,961 5 31,872 48,355 171 707,471 961,421 13 110,930 166,942 China 120 313,941 350,357 8 11,394 13,821 146 398,903 477,797 17 44,694 57,821 Total 947 3,233,520 4,122,853 108 590,034 878,215 1,289 4,807,994 6,097,078 171 1,071,342 1,594,397 SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 '75 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8 TOP SECRET TOP SECRET Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/12/18: CIA-RDP79R01012A011000020001-8