CONTESTED BALLOTS IN ITALIAN 1953 ELECTIONS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79R00890A000200020037-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 16, 1999
Sequence Number: 
37
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 22, 1953
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79R00890A000200020037-3.pdf112.84 KB
Body: 
NO. &l ?I ~~ ~V V ~C ` ~~ d For Release 2000/08/29 :CIA- DP79R00890A000200020037-3 ILLEGIB ce Me~no~~ndunz UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT 7ro : Assistant Director, Current Intelligence DAB: _~~ ~~?mh?~' ~ X53 FROM Chief, Western Division su8~ac~: Contested ballots in Italian 1953 elections A. Approxiriately 1,304,000 ballots in the election of ?-8 June were challenged by poll watchers as invalid for any one of several reasons - writing of any kind on ballot, failure to designate party as well as candidates, handing in blank ba.liot, using ballot not having an official stamp, etc. Examination of ballots by Chamber special committee is not yet complete but findings to date show that between 436,000 and 590,000 were invalid a.nd that from 700.,000 to X60,000 have to be recounted. Of this latter number, at least 100,000 have been recounted so far, according tv a reliable source, with the trend three to one in favor of the center electoral bloc of pasties., If "this is so, center parties gained more than 50 percent of the votes, y.,...-~#.~~se~__,~arch --=-~-- 19~r3 --e I.~?~-taxes}~.. l.a~z_. ma.7~ e e n t,,, d ,, ~t~.:,,s twa~.t h~.r ds o~?-~i~?ab'e r''s~w-yes: 25X1X late in~November as to why .center parties were concealing their victory , s t a.t e d t-ke--#--h~-t~i-~a-n"{~.Ira.~d?~ t krtow"?whxt__-~o-y-_d$?~~vi-th hef ..~.a~,aa~~--~-l~ts..,~1~~-?~ined. ILLEGIB To present,. to parliament would cause a chaotic situation in that body and necessitate new electio s n . ~~ ~~ ~. a announcet ~ the victory woa~ld be a. good device for dissolving Chamber,-~ would only be a. device ~ i~e~t-h~a-n ~~~,~t-he-?~Ss-t~ia.n ~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~ i^ - {~rl.~ would have to be develo ed ~" p e. ~. 7.... 1 L _:. Y.. ~ . 7 .. ~...S _. __ _. ___. __ i t_ ___~_ ~ _ Approved For Release 2000/ 890A000200020037-3 ' Approved For Release 2000/08~~~~DP79R00890A0002000?0037-3 tp~~ ara a f whole issue of the'{'~~-~vr~~ai~ " ~#~: t articularly in view of current efforts to repeal ~.. t ~~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~.~ It is possible that the slowness of recount may be due to general apprehension of the major parties over results and to the center parties' reluctance to bring up issue of the unpopular swindling law. Problem of rea.lloca.ting seats virtually insoluble and new elections probably only solution. . Parties in general do not want new elections. ~. They would be expensive. '~? Center fears extremes of left a.nd right might gain. Fear that unseating Communist deputies might induce violence by extreme left. Recount favoring center parties might call into question legality of present parliament's legis- lation. ~3ills are now in parliament to repeal the 29 March 1953 electoral law. If this is done, the recount would have little real meaning. 25X1A Approved For Release 200 _ 0890A000200020037-3