SUGGESTED DCI TALKING POINTS 17 MARCH 1977 SCC SUBCOMMITTEE ON PRM TASK 2

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79M00095A000100040013-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date: 
October 21, 2005
Sequence Number: 
13
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 17, 1977
Content Type: 
NOTES
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79M00095A000100040013-6.pdf132.27 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2005/11/21 : CIA-RDP79M00095AG80100040013-6 SUGGESTED DCI TALKING POINTS 17 March 1977 PRM 11 is (or should be) the culmination of a 2 1/2 year period of investigating the functions, structure, and performance of U.S. intelligence. It should set the course and structure of U.S. intelli- gence for some years to come. A number of vital issues are bound up in PRM 11, notably Task l's examination of the right way to reconcile the legitimate needs of security with an open political process and the rights of Americans under a sound body of law. Tasks 2 and 3 are essentially concerned with missions, structure, and management of the Intelligence Community. The role of the DCI is necessarily at the center of this discussion because the President and Congress have increasingly expected the DCI to take charge of the Community. The President desires a well and tightly managed national foreign intelligence effort. He clearly sees this as requiring a strong DCI. How that role is to be defined and empowered, however, is one of the open questions to be resolved by this PRM and the resultant Presidential decisions. DCI Views Since this PPM is in large part about my job, I can be seen as having a major vested interest in its outcome. But I probably do not have any greater vested interest than do the other major departments affected by it. I am open minded as to how the role of the DCI should be configured. But I shall have to be making up my mind rapidly as we move toward the deadline of 1 June. Approved For Release 2005/11/21 : CIA-RDP79M00095A000100040013-6 Approved For Release 2005/11/21 : CIA-RDP79M00095AQ00100040013-6 Moreover, there is one strong prejudice I do not expect to relax: Namely that the responsibilities and the powers of the DCI must be in balance. If I am to be held accountable by the President and the Congress for certain results, such as a rationally allocated NFIP budget, I shall argue for the powers I see as necessary to achieve those results. I want to assure you, however, that I am very sensitive to the fact that U.S. national intelligence must serve many customers and that those customers must have means to influence and, in some respects, control the services they get. As a military officer, I am especially sensitive to the needs of the Defense Department. The essence of our problem is reconciling the need for a diversity of services to many with tight management of a tight budget and superlative service to our most important customer, the President. Task 2, the focus of this subcommittee of the SCC, is essentially diagnostic and analytical: What is the character of the DCI's role today, and what are its problems? Options and decisions will come in Task 3. To a large degree the stage will be set for them by Task 2. What. degree exactly is something we ought to discuss here. Organization In your folder there is a chart on how we are organizing Task 2. This subcommittee will provide overall direction and will review the product before submitting it to the full SCC. We shall probably meet at least two more times; once in early April and again in mid- April. The next element down is a large working group of inherently flexible composition. It might better be called an argument group. Its purpose will be to argue out the substantive issues of the Task 2 report as they come up. The Executive Secretariat will be respon- sibile for pulling together the representatives and individual experts required for a given issue. This working group will also review draft parts of the report as they are prepared. Approved For Release 2005/11/21 : CIA-RDP79M00095A000100040013-6 Approved For Release 2005/11/21 : CIA-RDP79M000954Qp0100040013-6 I should emphasize here that I have a good understanding with Secretary Brown that intelligence officers sub- ordinate to :him may participate candidly and directly in this process of argument. The Executive Secretariat is really a drafting group headed by It has several officers from the IC Staff, one from CIA, and one, I believe, from OSD. This Secretariat will handle administrative and scheduling matters as well. We already have what seems to me to be a very ser- viceable outline of the report around which we can structure the needed work. It is, of course, subject to adjustment as work proceeds. At present we should not expect the deadline to slip. We must get Task 2 (and also Task 1) finished with sufficient time to handle the contentious issues in Task 3, chaired by Dr. Brzezinski. Approved For Release 2005/11/21 : CIA-RDP79M00095A000100040013-6 Approved For Release 2005/11/21 : CIA-RDP79M00095A000100040013-6 Talking points for 17 March 1977 meeting -- given to DCI, DDCI, and D/DCI/IC only. Mm 3/22/77 FORM 5.75 I'JI EU DITIONSI O11s Approved For Release 2005/11/21 : CIA-RDP79M00095A000100040013-6