SPEC. ASST. (ADMIN.) TO DD/I DIARY

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP79-01041A000100020006-7
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: T
• Document Page Count: 1
• Document Creation Date: December 9, 2016
• Document Release Date: August 29, 2000
• Sequence Number: 6
• Publication Date: December 30, 1952
• Content Type: NOTES

Approved. For Release 2000/09/1 041 A0001000Z~006~7
Spec. Asst. tAO.min. tiV IA)/-L L1Ql.r
25X1A9a
Tuesday, December 30, 1952
25X1A8a 1. Attended the 0/CI Telecon with during which he exchanged .
concerning the pending reduction in
messages with the Chief,
25X1 A6 advised him that he had secured an understand-25X1 A9a
ing with EE to continue with planned chances for rotation and assignment of per-
sonnel during this interim period pending final determinations concerning the
25X1 A6@eneral cutback
2. Discussed with 0/RR the effect of the recent notice prohibiting the pay-
ment of overtime for training. I agreed to discuss the matter with DD/A in an
effort to secure approval for the continuation of overtime payment for the two
Saturday morning courses presently being given by 0/RR.
Discussed with Colonel White, DD/P concurrence in the establishment of
25X1 B4d with the condition that the present DCI
ceiling on the Senior Aep T/U be increased It was agreed that25X1 B4d
he would consider the possibility of a separate 0/RR T/0 for the team rather than
establishing it as an integral part of the Senior Rep's T/0.
b.. In further discussion of the ceiling question, Colonel White advised
that the DD/A was personally reviewing requirements in DD/A area in an effort 25X9A2
to cut their present ceiling allocation. I urged that a special effort be made
25X9A2 to get the DCI to recognize the present overall ceiling allocation approximating
?r rather than to require a cutback to the original figure
White agreed that this issue had probably not been fully discussed with the DCI
and indicated that in future discussions an effort would be made to confirm the
present figure. 25X1A9a
5. Discussed the following with
a. It was agreed that it was desirable in connection with the
establishment of a GS-16 for the Chief of FDD that Classification
& Wage should be requested to survey the current functions and
responsibilities of FDD and that resubmission of the GS-16 re-
quest to the Supergrade Board should await the results of this
survey as well as approval of the NSCID.
b. Discussed pending 0 & M proposal for centralized direction
and administration of graphics services under 0/tilt, to which FDD
enen-
had dissented. As FDD has only one specialized individual
gaged in graphics work) it does not appear expedient
FDD under the plan and I agreed to request an exemption from 0 & M.
6. Learned that the Supergrade report has not as yet been referred to the
DCI - being still under consideration 25X1A9a
M25X1A9a
Approved For Release 2000/09/12 : C pBR9cGi1 41A000100021I O6t7i;epereted from the the it must or)
subjected to individual systematic reviM