SUGAR PRODUCTION AND THE GROWTH OF THE CUBAN ECONOMY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79-00927A004900090004-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
8
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Sequence Number: 
4
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79-00927A004900090004-8.pdf331.66 KB
Body: 
2 July 1965 Copy No. 52 SPECIAL REPORT SUGAR PRODUCTION AND THE GROWTH OF THE CUBAN ECONOMY CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY O F F I C E O F R E S E A R C H A N D R E P O R T S SECRET GROUP I Excluded from automatic downgrading and declassification Approved For Release 2006/08/30: CIA-RDP79-00927AO04900090004-8 Approved For Release 2006/08/30: CIA-RDP79-00927AO04900090004-8 Approved For Release 2006/08/30: CIA-RDP79-00927AO04900090004-8 1%W1 *Aar SECRET SUGAR PRODUCTION AND TIIE GROWTH OF THE CUBAN ECONOMY The growth of Cuba's economy depends to a very large extent on production of sugar, which accounts directly for about 25 percent of its gross national product (GNP) and provides about 85 percent of its foreign exchange income. This income is needed to finance imports of virtually all its capital goods, most of its fuels, a vital part of its raw materials, and about one third of its foodstuffs. Thus, sugar not only makes the largest single direct contribu- tion to Cuba's GNP but, indirectly, it provides the imported goods upon which all the rest of the econ- omy depends. The starting point for the analysis that fol- lows is the working hypothesis that sugar produc- tion will reach 10 million metric tons in 1970, the goal set by current plans. The economic effects of this growth in sugar production are then explored in terms of two roughly limiting sets of assump- tions: the least and the most favorable circum- stances that may reasonably be expected to prevail between now and 1970. Estimates of Sugar Production n import Capacity Table I assumes the follow- ing: that world sugar prices will average about 2.5 cents per pound during 1966-1970; that sugar exports to Communist coun- tries other than the USSR will remain at about 1.0 million met- ric tons while exports to the USSR will rise after 1968 to the 5.0 million tons called for by the 1964 Cuban-Soviet agreement; that sugar exports to the free world will remain at about 2.0 million tons until exports to the bloc reach their maximum; finally, that aid to Cuba from the Communist countries will be reduced gradually and in propor- tion to the increasing value of Cuba's exports. There is one modification to the free world price assumption, i.e., that the sharp increase in sales to the free world in 1970 will depress prices to 2.0 cents per pound. Table II assumes: first that free world prices will im- prove in 1966--probably as a re- sult of re-establishment of the quota system under the Interna- tional Sugar Agreement--a.nd will average about 3.5 cents per pound during 1966-1970; that Cuba will maintain exports to the free world at about 2.0 mil- lion tons, either voluntarily or as a result of the workings of a new quota system; that the Communist countries will absorb all of Cuba's increased exports and, finally, that aid from Com- munist countries will remain at the $225 million estimated for 1965. SECRET Page 1 SPECIAL REPORT 2 July 65 Approved For Release 2006/08/30: CIA-RDP79-00927AO04900090004-8 Approved For Release 2006/08/30: CIA-RDP79-00927AO04900090004-8 SECRET SECRET TABLE I Economic Significance of Rising Cuban Sugar Production Under Least Favorable Assumptions Total Capacity to Import (Millions US Dollars) Year Sugar Production Volume to Bloc Volume to Free World Bloc Aid From Bloc From Free World Total (1,000 MT) (1,000 MT) (1,000MT) (Million US $) 1965 6,000 3,500 2,000 225 745 170 915 1966 6,500 4,000 2,000 165 745 150 895 1967 7,000 4,500 2,000 100 745 150 895 1968 8,000 5,500 2,000 -- 775 150 925 1969 9,000 6,000 2,500 -- 840 180 1,020 1970 10,000 6,000 3,500 -- 840 195 1,035 TABLE II Economic Significance of Rising Cuban Sugar Production Under Most Favorable Assumptions Total Capacit (Million U y to Imp S Dollar ort s) (1,000 MT) (1,000MT) (1,000 MT) (Million US $) 1965 6,000 3,500 2,000 225 745 170 915 1966 6,500 4,000 2,000 225 805 195 1,000 1967 7,000 4,500 2,000 225 870 195 1,065 1968 8,000 5,500 2,000 225 1,005 195 1,200 1969 9,000 6,500 2,000 225 1,135 195 1,455 1970 10,000 7,500 2,000 225 1,260 195 1,455 Past Cuban Imports For Comparison (Million US Dollars) SECRET Approved For Release 2006/08/30: CIA-RDP79-00927AO04900090004-8 Approved For Release 2006/08/30: CIA-RDP79-00927AO04900090004-8 SECRET Both tables assume that domestic consumption will remain at about 500,000 tons annually; that Communist countries will continue to pay about 6 cents per pound for Cuban sugar; and that other exports will continue to earn about $100 million an- nually--$60 million from Com- munist countries and $40 million from the free world. To permit comparison with the past, Table III gives annual import totals for 1955-58 and 1962-63 and es- timates imports last year at almost a. billion dollars, up from $633 million in 1955. Of the various assumptions, those relating to prices and to Communist aid policy are the most critical in estimating which of the limits will come closest to reality. With respect to the price paid by the Communist countries, there is no credible evidence that the principal bloc pur- chasers--the USSR and Communist China--now intend to adjust their buying price of 6 cents per pound. How long this situa- tion will continue, however, is open to speculation. The free-world price of 2.5 cents per pound assumed in Table I probably is too low. The spot price is now about 1.8 cents a pound, but prices currently being quoted in 1966 future markets range between 2.6 cents for March and 3.0 cents for October. Fur- ther, there is considerable in- terest (even on the part of the Cubans) in the restoration of a marketing quota system under in- ternational agreement; if re- stored, such a system would help to revive prices. It probably will be difficult, however, to achieve a radical improvement. The present International Sugar Agreement called for a minimum price of 3.25 cents per pound which its quota system sought to maintain. Nevertheless, during the three years before that quota system was suspended at the end of 1961, the minimum price was rarely achieved. Prices per pound averaged 2.98 cents in 1959, 3.10 cents in 1960, and 2.91 cents in 1961. On the question of Commu- nist aid, there is virtually no evidence that can be called upon for guidance concerning the al- ternate assumptions made in the tables. For 1965, at least, the USSR did maintain its aid com- mitment to Cuba. at the 1964 level, even though significant increases in sugar exports were clearly expected. But this obviously is no guarantee that the same pat- tern will hold throughout the next five years. Concerning the hypothesis that sugar production will reach 10 million tons by 1970, about all that can be said is that the industry is making a good recovery from the depressed levels of re- cent years. From a. low point of 3.8 million tons in 1963, sugar production rose to 4.6 million tons in 1964 and evidently has approached 6.0 million tons in the harvest now being completed. At this point, there appears to be a good chance that output will increase to 6.5 million tons in SECRET Page 3 SPECIAL REPORT 2 July 65 Approved For Release 2006/08/30: CIA-RDP79-00927AO04900090004-8 Approved For Release 2006/08/30: CIA-RDP79-00927AO04900090004-8 NW-V SECRET 1966. Beyond that, it is dif- ficult to forecast. There is little doubt that Cuba has the agricultural poten- tial to grow 10 million tons, but harvesting capacity can be expanded only by extensive mech- anization. In order to harvest this year's crop, extra. labor had to be recruited from almost every sector of the economy. This expedient solution to the harvesting problem obviously has its limit, and Cuba is prob- ably approaching it. Mechaniza- tion, moreover, has met with only limited success thus far. The most important step in this di- rection was taken this year with the introduction of 500 cane combines into the harvest. Cuban officials admit, however, that the combines are still only in the experimental stage. In short, it is still too early to say whether or not harvesting com- bines can be developed to work satisfactorily and supply a major impetus to sugar produc- tion under Cuban conditions. Imports and Economic Growth Data on Cuba's foreign trade in the pre-Castro period indicate that from the late 1940s through the late 1950s, imports increased at an average rate of about 5.5 percent an- nually. During the same period, Cuban GNP grew at an average annual rate of approximately 3 percent. This suggests that at the present stage of Cuba's de- velopment a given growth rate for GNP may require a somewhat higher rate of increase for im- ports. The relationship between the two growth rates is obviously not fixed, however. To the extent that Cuba emphasizes the growth of its agricultural sector, which requires a relatively small input of imported materials, the rate of increase in GNP should rise relative to the increase in im- port capacity. Further, if growth in either industry or ag- riculture results in competitive domestic output of products for- merly imported, this will also increase the rate of growth in GNP relative to import growth. Cuba's current emphasis on agricultural development should produce more GNP growth for a given import rate, but little priority is being given to re- placement of imports by domestic production. Some import sub- stitution is being developed in the textile industries. Food production, however, is being hurt by expansion of the sugar sector. Production of several basic foodstuffs such as rice, corn, a.nd beans has already de- clined, and cotton production evidently has been cut. Import substitution in textile manufac- ture therefore will be largely offset by the need for larger food and raw fiber imports over the next few years. Inspection of Table I shows that, if the least favorable cir- cumstances prevail, the level of imports will tend to stagnate over the next five years. Further, since rising sugar production would require some increase in imported supplies, imports for other areas would need to be cut. Thus, general development of the economy would be strangled. SECRET Page 4 SPECIAL REPORT 2 July 65 Approved For Release 2006/08/30: CIA-RDP79-00927AO04900090004-8 Approved For Release 2006/08/30: CIA-RDP79-00927AO04900090004-8 SECRET Table II presents a sharp contrast. The average annual increase in imports projected under the most favorable assump- tions is nearly 9 percent, enough to support a consider- able growth of the whole economy. Potentials of Import substitution A brief commentary needs to be added concerning the conse- quences if sugar production fails to reach the 10-million-ton goal. Cuba presently has no other ex- port commodity that could sustain adequate growth of import capac- ity and no prospect of develop- ing one within the next five years. If it proves impossible to push sugar production above some Limit considerably short of 10 million tons, then the in- crease of import capacity will be cut short even under the most favorable circumstances. It would be a mistake, how- ever, to conclude that the pos- sibility of economic growth would necessarily be short circuited. As suggested earlier, import sub- stitution offers Cuba an alternate route to economic development, at least temporarily. Cuba could divert resources from further ef- forts to expand sugar into the ex- pansion of other sectors of agri- culture or into industry; such a policy might not increase exports but it could reduce the need to import many foodstuffs and some manufactured goods. Import sub- stitution of this type which is reasonably competitive has the same economic effect as an in- crease in exports. Of course, for a country like Cuba, with a relatively small internal market and a number of resource con- straints, import substitution has its limits. But for a term of, say, five to ten years it could provide an adequate channel for further economic development. SE CRE T Page 5 SPECIAL REPORT 2 July 65 Approved For Release 2006/08/30: CIA-RDP79-00927AO04900090004-8 Approved For Release 2006/08/30: CIA-RDP79-00927AO04900090004-8 SECRET SECRET Approved For Release 2006/08/30: CIA-RDP79-00927AO04900090004-8