CURRENT GOALS OF THE FRENCH COMMUNIST PARTY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79-00927A004500090002-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
7
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Sequence Number: 
2
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79-00927A004500090002-4.pdf505.41 KB
Body: 
ase 2006/10103 :CIA-RDP79-00927A00450~}090002-4 CUH~tE;NT GOALS OF THE . FRENCH COMMUNxST PARTY ~ENTI~AL, LNTELLIGENCEr AGONY GRO~JP I Excluded fre~m autamotc dowrigroding.and declassification Approved For Relea~2006/10103 :CIA-RDP79-00927A0045~090002-4 NJ~~''~FiIAL C[)1~T~'AZ~I S ~NFCD~IY~ATQI~T ~ `I"'I-I~ I~'ATIC)NAL Z?FF1~d~E OF TIDE U~tll~`~1~ ~'. I`~~SII~i T~~ MEANI~'C C~1i' TT~i: EPS!C~Il~AE L ~~~x~~ 1~, r~s~, FCT~c~~s ~9~ .~~~ ~t~~, ~~:~ ~r~~z~- ~caz~ c~ ~~vE~,A~~c~~ ~F wxz~x ~~ ~~~ ~~r~~ ~t~ >~~Et~~r~A~r~c~r~ c~a~~~s dc~cue~t mar ~ vmEt 5p~cs ~c ~ssarr~~r~at~ar~ ~:c~r~~rois Kri caccordr~rsce vwitFi tFie pt?c~v~s~c~r&s of D~Ctt~` 1~~' tea c~ea~urrtarst must be handed withdr~ the frarn~c~r a ~a {ir~~tation so im~os~d. I 25X1 Approved Far Release 2006/10103 :CIA-RDP79-00927A004500090002-4 Approved For Release 2006/10103: CIA-RDP79-00927A004500090002-4 SECRET 24 July 1964 CUR~,ENT GOALS OF THE FRENCH COMMUNIST PARTY The French Communist Party (PCF) continues to base its program on loyalty to Moscow, unseating the Gaullist regime, and reinstituting parliamentary supremacy in France. Currently its dominant politi- cal objective is unity of action with the French Socialist Party (SFIO) which it would use to help it to break out of isolation and win caz~trol of the government. The death of party president.Maurice Thorez on 11 July will not affect this strategy, and may intensify efforts toward commom action with the Socialists and "other elements of the democratic left," As the Soviet threat to Europe appears to wane, part of the French left, notably -the SFIO, may be increasingly attracted by the prospect of a re- turn to power offered by collaboration with the PCF. PCF Strength The PCF is the most tightly organized major Communist party in Western Europe and the most dependably Moscow-oriented. It is second to the Italian Commu- nist Party as the most powerful in domestic politics. In a coun- try with a population of 4S mil- lion, the PCF has an estimated 250,000 to 300,000 members, but it can draw nearly a quarter of the popular vote in national elections. Socialist support would give a new "popular front'' more electoral strength than the Gaullist Party (UNR), which won a dominant position with only one third of the first-ballot vote in-the 196.7. National Assem- bly election. Emergence From Isolation Communist Party leaders are now optimistically estimating their prospects for close ties with the Socialists as better than they were in 1936 or 1945. Tk~y cite as evidence the several SECRET successful joint .actions of their respective unions, notably during the coal strike of March 1963, and joint efforts in other fields such as the campaign against a nuclear strike force, Anxious to exploit fully the increasing Socialist commit- ment to "tactical" electoral co- operation with them, the Commu- nists urge their "fellow Marx- ists" to look at the record. Beginning with the November 1962 national election, both parties have gained notably in the number of national and local representa- tives. During the November elec- tion SFIO Secretary General Guy Mollet directed his followers to back the Communists in constit- uencies where the alternative on the second ballot was a Gaullist. The PCF reciprocated by withdraw- ing candidates in 35 constitu- encies where the Socialists were the best placed anti-Gaullists. Although the support diverted to the Socialists cost the PCF some loss on the second ballot Approved For Release 2006/10103: CIA-RDP79-00927A004500090002-4 Approved For Release ,2006/10103: CIA-RDP79-00927A004500090002-4 SECRET in 1962 (21,8 percent of the popular vote to 21.3 percent), the Communists were able to breach the. isolation they had experi- enced in the 1950s, and to in- crease their National Assembly representation from 10 to 41 seats. In -the March 1964 can- tonal. elections, through similar. Socialist cooperation, the PCF again escaped isolation and al- most doubled its departmental General Council seats from 50 to 99, For their part, the So- cialists in 1962 were able to increase their electoral strength from 12.6 percent on the first ballot to 15,2 percent on the second, and to increase their National Assembly seats from 43 to 64. In the 1964 cantonal elections the SFIO managed, with PCF support, a modest increase from 267 to 286 General Council seats. SFIO-PCF Dialogue In January 196:4 the Social- ists initiated a public dialogue with the Communists in their newspaper Le Populaire. They delin'eatedZ?omm'un s~ positions with which they felt there could be no compromise, notably the PCPs subservience to Moscow, its ultimate objective of a single-party state, and its lack of internal party democracy. However, they also alluded to common Marxist goals. The PCF reply in Pliarch in L'Humanit~ to the principal So- Tlis~ accusations seemed half- hearted and vaguely worded. It reserved its few eloquent pro- nouncements to elaborate on so- cial and political objectives that should appeal to ali i~~larx- ists. The PCF urged joint ac- tion to bring about increased outlays for education, to end public financing of church-con- trolled. schools, to improve hous- ing, to expand workers' benefits, and to oppose France's nuclear policy. Such mutually acceptable objectives were supported by the appeal for "-joint action between Communists, Socialists, and all other democrats" to defeat "the personal po~~~er of De Gaulle" and '"re-establish" democratic insti- tutions in France, This call for action,: by stressing legis- lative sxzpremacy, appealed di- rectly to Guy Mollet, SFIO sec- retary general, the only major non-Communist political figure publicly committed to this theme. The PCF response to the Socialist challenge tried to blur the basic ideological differences between the two parties with a siren song detailing the immediate advan- tages of closer collaboration,. Fealty to Moscow and Party Discipline The PCPs campaign to win SFIO converts to a "popularr front" has been accompanied by relentless efforts to assure strict uniformity within its own ranks, At the 17th party congress in May the leadership reaffirmed its Moscow orienta- tion and warned the relatively small pro-Chinese elements and. the somewhat larger "impartial" segment to conform. The congress vigorously decried the "deforma- tions and schismatic activity of the leaders of the Chinese Commu- nist Party" and called for a world Communist conference to condemn their actions, Party presic',ent Thorez' death an 11 July is not expected SECRET Approved For Release 2006/10103: CIA-RDP79-00927A004500090002-4 Approved For Release, 2006/10103: CIA-RDP79-00927AOOa500090002-4 ,SECRET to alter the sthong pro-Soviet stance of the PCF in the current Soviet-Chinese feud. The "impartial" PCF member- ship includes the Un~.on of Com- munist Students (UDC) which follows the Italian Communist lead and argues that the Chinese "should be heard." The PCF failed to coerce the students by forcing the dissolution of their congress last spring, anct later withdrew support of their publication when it wished to print an article by Italian Com- munist Party secretary general Togliatti in preference to one by Thorez. The students never- theless published the controver- sial article. The party congress therefore decided to merge the UEC and other party youth groups into a single body directly under top party control. Greater Internal Democracy The party congress tried to balance its disciplinarian tactics with a show of internal democ- racy,,; both to help persuade its own Italian-oriented deviation- ists and to impress the Social- ists. In the interest of "ad- vancing democracy within the PCF" a resolution was adopted calling far the election by se- cret ballot of party officials at all levels including the cen- tral committee. The ''democratic centralism" of the PCF, however, remains essentially unaffected, since the one candidate permitted to run for each vacancy must be confirmed by nominating commis- sions controlled by the pax?ty organization. Voters may simply approve ar c)isapprove a candi- date selected by the central authority. Critics in the party who urged a free voter Selection of officials were admonished for being "overly attached to bourgeois democracy." Other ef:Forts to present an image of "rl.emocratization" seem equally unconvincing. The most striking internal initia- tive, perhaps, was the replace- ment of old-guard "Stalinist" Maurice Thorez as secretary gen- eral by Waldeck-kdochet, a A+Ios- cow-trained agricultural special- ist, This was partly to appease the more liberally inclined PCF elements as well as old-line Socialists who found it diffi- cult to forget caustic exchanges of the past. Waldeck-k~ochet, however, is a proven party stal- wart, and Thorez had been as- signed to the newly created post of party president with the under- standing that he would remain active in the party affairs. Thorez' death aboard a Soviet liner on 11 July.. precludes an evaluation of just how his au- thority may have been affected. It is doubtful, however, that his death will greatly influence the organizational procedures of the F - chet as 25X1 -CIi~PS~L'~"pow r e iT~scenes" for the past few years. The party congress also reorganized the central commit- tee, ostensibly to inject some young blood into the party leader- ship. The ages of nearly one third of the ?0 full members now average in their mid-30s; but SECRET Approved Far Release 2006110!03 : CIA-RDP79-00927A004500090002-4 Approved For Release 2006/10103: CIA-RDP79-00927A004500090002-4 SECRET ~ most members were previously alternates and are tested ortho- dox leaders of the provincial organizations, The secretariat, which was decreased in strength from seven to five members, now includes a new one, a 31-year- old former mechanic from pro- vincial France. Outlook The meager relaxation of "democratic centralism" confirms the Socialists' criticism that the PCF prohibits freedom of choice within its own organiza- tion. The SFIO's appetite, how- ever, for mutually beneficial pragmatic cooperation remains unimpaired. This is apparent in its preparation for the mu- nicipal elections scheduled for early 1965, The recently passed munic- ipal election law introduced a rigid list system in cities of aver 30,000 population, re- moving the option of ticket .splitting and party combinations on the second ballot. Parties, consequently, must form viable combinations on the first ballot. The Gaullist LTNId, sponsored the law to farce polarization and to win the smaller center and center-left parties to the Gaul- list banner because of their presumed fear of a leftist, Com- munist-dominated "popular front." The SFIO is thereby encouraged into further arrangements with the PCF to score in the municipal elections. Socialist leaders allege, however, that such ar- rangements will-continue to be purely tactical. The PCF has avoided desig- nating a candidate for the pres- idential race, which must con- stitutionally be held before the end of 1965. It continues to insist that it will not sup- port the SFIO candidate, Gaston Defferre, unless some understand- ing on a common platform is reached between-the two parties. Defferre has stated publicly that as the only viable candidate of the left he can count on PCF support without making any com- mitments to the Communists. The arithmetic of the elections would clearly indicate, he points out, that if the PCF presented a can- didate, the Communists would place second after De Gaulle in plurality votes on the first ballot, and would thus be pitted against the general in the run- off. Virtually all non-Commu- nists would then probably rally to De Gaulle as the better of the alternatives, inflicting a stunning defeat on the PCF. To avoid such an anti-Communist coalescence--and incidentally an impressive Gaullist victory-- the PCF must cooperate with the more universally acceptable SFIO and acquiesce in a Social- ist candidate. The PCF, despite this cogent argument, is still demanding some. quid pro quo for such cooperation, and at the recent party congress SECRET Approved Far Release 2006110!03 : CIA-RDP79-00927A004500090002-4 Approved For Release 2006/10103: CIA-RDP79-00927A004500090002-4 SECRET Waldeck-Rochet flatly declared that the PCF would not support the .SFIO candidate without a clear statement on a common program, It is probable that this "electoral arithmetic" looms large in Waldeck-Rocket's think- ing, and that he may ultimately settle for less than a common platform to support the SFIO presidential candidate. A re- laxation of PCF resolve on this issue, however, may encourage a further reappraisal of the par- ty's position on current issues, and party elements eager to cap- italize on Thore~' death caulcl insist on a more open approach to other parties an all questions. This implies a threat to direct controls by Moscow, but it also suggests a real danger far the splintered democratic 25X1 surer sing y ree of appre- 25X1 hension concerning collab rat' with the Communists. SECRET Approved For Release 2006/10103: CIA-RDP79-00927A004500090002-4