NORTH KOREA, COMMUNIST CHINA'S INDEPENDENT ALLY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79-00927A004400020002-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
19
Document Creation Date: 
December 20, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 8, 2006
Sequence Number: 
2
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 6, 1964
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79-00927A004400020002-2.pdf935.61 KB
Body: 
as 06/11/13: CIA-RDP79-00927AO0440'20002-2 6 March 1964 OCI No. 0321/64A Copy No. SPECIAL REPORT NORTH KOREA, COMMUNIST CHINA'S INDEPENDENT ALLY CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY OFFICE OF CURRENT INTELLIGENCE SECRET Approved For Release 2006/11/13 : CIA-RDP79-00927A004400020001R:~"' I Excluded from automatic u:mgrading and declassification 25X1 Approved For Release 2006/11/13 : CIA-RDP79-00927AO04400020002-2 Approved For Release 2006/11/13 : CIA-RDP79-00927AO04400020002-2 Approved For lease 2006/11/13 : CIA-RDP79-009204400020002-2 SECRET NORTH KOREA, COMMUNIST CHINA'S INDEPENDENT ALLY Over the past two years, Pyongyang has emerged as Peiping's strongest Asian supporter in the Sino- Soviet dispute. Moscow, in retaliation, has attempted to exact political concessions as the price for con- tinued economic aid. North Korea's refusal to accept these conditions has clouded prospects for future Soviet economic and possibly military assistance. Soviet aid in some economic spheres has apparently al- ready been curtailed. So far, the North Koreans have not backtracked at all in their espousal of pro-Chinese positions. They do appear, however, to be moving cautiously to avoid further widening the substance of their dispute with Moscow. In recent months, moreover, they have taken pains to show that North Korea is not a Chinese satellite and that their allegiance to Peiping stems basically from consideration of their own national interests. North Korea Opts for Peiping Pyongyang initially attempted to remain aloof from the Moscow-Peiping rivalry. Both China and the Soviet Union had played key roles in developing and sustaining the Communist re- gime in North Korea, and both had retained a strong influence in Pyongyang. The Koreans were, nonetheless, distressed at the magnitude of the de-Staliniza- tion program in the Soviet Union, and Pyongyang's party and state chief, Kim Il-sung, looked with particular concern on the re- laxation of government restraints over the Russian populace, view- ing them as inimical to his own strict, authoritarian controls. Through a full-scale purge of his rivals, Kim had estab- lished a Stalin-like pre-emi- nence of his own by 1960. Ile had also managed to preserve considerable independence of action for his party, despite the presence of numerous Soviet and Chinese advisers. Fearing that liberalization in Russia would have an adverse impact on the attitude of the Korean people toward his regime, Kim began to isolate them from So- viet influence. Relays of Rus- sian broadcasts in Korean were suspended in 1961, and the re- call of some North Korean stu- dents studying in Soviet bloc countries was begun. During 1962, North Korean concern with Moscow widened to include the question of Soviet foreign policy. Pyongyang began to interpret some Soviet diplo- matic moves as weak-willed con- cessions to the West, and strong, albeit indirect, criticism of Moscow appeared in North Korean SECRET Approved For Release 2006/11/13 : CIA-RDP79-00927A004400020002-2 Approved For Release 2006/11/13 : CIA-RDP79-00927A004400020002-2 SECRET propaganda. Pyongyang--which, like Peiping, views the US as the main obstacle to attainment of its goal of national reuni- fication--began to see Peiping's hard-line foreign policy stance as more suited to its own in- terests. Pyongyang felt that the US military presence in South Korea dictated a policy of unyielding hostility. Soviet action during the Cuban missile crisis--the Koreans called it a "capitulation" to the US--ap- parently convinced Pyongyang that the USSR could not be de- pended upon to defend the in- terests of its allies. Korea's Present Position Following the Cuban crisis, Pyongyang expanded its support of China to include all major issues in the dispute. It did attempt, however, to preserve some freedom of maneuver in the controversy. It refrained, for example, from becoming fully involved, as the Albanians did, in the running propaganda ex- change between Moscow and Pei- ping. By and large, the North Koreans seem to take a pragmatic ap- proach to the dispute, quickly commenting on issues of concern to their own interests--espe- cially the question of support for the national revolutionary movement--but not rushing to defend the Chinese on every point which arises. Pyongyang has not commented, for example, on the issue of Sino-Soviet border friction which has been repeatedly aired by Peiping and Moscow. On the other hand, Pyongyang wasted no time in showing annoyance at Moscow's failure, during the UN session last September, to re- peat its 1962 resolution on the withdrawal of US troops from South Korea, The elimination of US influence from the South and the extension'of Communist control over the whole country remair, Pyongyang's primary pol- icy goal. Any suggestions of Soviet softness toward the pres- ence of US forces in Korea is thus unacceptable to Kim's re- gime. Pyongyang is, by contrast, clearly grateful to Peiping for its tough propaganda backing against the US. Recently, however, the North Koreans have taken some pains to show that while they are ideologically aligned with Peiping, they are not a Chinese satellite. This was evident last fall in the careful recep- tion by Pyongyang of a visiting delegation led by Chinese Com- munist president Liu Shao-chi. It was expected that the visit would occasion a strong and specific North Korean defense of Peiping against Soviet at- tacks. On the contrary, Pyong- yang limited itself to pro for- ma condemnations of revisionism, and only one Korean official-- a member of the second echelon --specifically defended the Chi- nese against Moscow. The conclusion of the visit was marked by an unprecedentedly terse communique, and there were hints in the Chinese press af- ter Liu's return that Peiping was less than satisfied with SECRET Approved For Release 2006/11/13 : CIA-RDP79-00927A004400020002-2 Approved For Refwase 2006/11/13 : CIA-RDP79-00927A0400020002-2 SECRET the treatment of the delegation. The Koreans waited a month fol- lowing the visit before issuing a statement reiterating their political affinity with the Chinese. Pyongyang probably in- tended the delay as a demonstra- tion that its policy of support- ing Peiping was an independent decision, not one forced by Chi- nese pressure. Since Liu's visit, both sides have hinted at undisclosed policy differences. These, in part, may involve the North Ko- rean decision to concentrate during 1964 on the production of consumer goods as an immedi- ate economic goal. Pyongyang has announed plans to channel enough economic resources into this effort to register a 35-per- cent increase in consumer goods this year. Peiping may well look askance at this development since, in the Chinese view, Communist governments should keep tight curbs on consumer satisfaction in order to increase the re- sources available for building the all-important industrial sector of the economy. Pyongyang's decision to concentrate on consumer produc- tion during 1964 was a drastic shift from its past emphasis on development of heavy industry. During 1963, however, the rate of North Korean industrial de- velopment had already begun to slacken. According to statistics released by Pyongyang, the in- crease in gross value of indus- trial output for 1963 was only 8 percent. This compares with the 11 percent planned, and 20 percent claimed, for 1962. The shortfall probably re- sulted in part from problems in the allocation of manpower and material. However, it may also have reflected a partial disrup- tion in the flow of Soviet as- sistance. For example, Moscow has reportedly been stalling on delivery of equipment for key Korean thermal power proj- ects. Pyongyang has implicitly accused the Soviet Union of us- ing economic aid as a weapon for imposing its political views, and has also publicly rejected the concept of an international division of labor as espoused by the bloc's Council for Mu- tual Economic Assistance. Pyong- yang has labeled it a Russian scheme to perpetuate the back- ward economic status of some bloc countries and make them mere economic appendages of the USSR. Late in 1962, Pyongyang publicly adopted a policy of eco- nomic self-reliance and announced that it was planning to build a self-sufficient economy. The North Koreans appear to be uncertain about the pros- pects of future Soviet assist- ance in the industrial sphere. The visit of a Soviet economic delegation to North Korea last summer apparently ended in noth- ing more than a vague agreement in principle to continue economic cooperation. It appears, SECRET Approved For Release 2006/11/13 : CIA-RDP79-00927AO04400020002-2 Approved For Release 2006/11/13 : CIA-RDP79-00A004400020002-2 SECRET moreover, that the regime is no longer seriously concerned with fulfilling its seven-year plan (1961-67) which was predicated on a high level of Soviet eco- nomic assistance. Its decision to turn temporarily toward con- sumer production may be a gap- filling measure while it seeks a long-range substitute for So- viet aid and attempts to straighten existing dislocations in the economy. In an apparent effort to find alternate sources of supply for goods formerly obtained from the Soviet bloc, Pyongyang em- barked during 1963 on a vigorous but so far largely unsuccessful program of trade expansion in the free world. Recent trade agreements with Western sup- pliers involve some items for- merly purchased from the USSR and the European satellites. Pyongyang apparently also de- sires to develop new sources of capital goods to aid industrial expansion. The North Koreans probably also hope that wider diplomatic recognition will come from their expanded trade contacts. They have been notably unsuccessful so far in efforts to erase the stigma of the Korean war by win- ning recognition from non-Com- munist countries. Only?five-- all in Africa--have recognized Pyongyang, and none of these maintains a resident ambassador there. Military Policy There have been some indi- cations that North Korean con- cern over the present level and future nature of Soviet aid ex- tends to the sphere of military assistance. Soviet-provided equipment has long formed the backbone of the Korean armed forces. Pyongyang's air arm, for example, is composed en- tirely of Soviet-built aircraft. Since the Korean war, the regime has put special emphasis on ad- vanced military technology in its bid to obtain armed superi- ority over the UN forces in South Korea. It has thus de- veloped a large and versatile air force, now fifth largest in the bloc, and more than double the size of Seoul's. There were broad hints in Pyongyang propaganda in December 1962 that the Soviet Union had threatened to curtail its mili- tary assistance program to Ko- rea, thus putting additional political pressure on Kim's re- gime. Shortly afterward, Pyong- yang declared it necessary to channel more domestic resources into the maintenance and develop- ment of its military establish- ment. In September 1963, the regime admitted that this policy had contributed to its industrial slowdown. Niuscow is almost certainly con- tinuing to supply defensive equipment, possibly under 25X1 4 SECRET Approved For Release 2006/11/13 : CIA-RDP79-00927A004400020002-2 Approved For Rele'd a 2006/11/13 : CIA-RDP79-00927AO04 0020002-2 SECRET long-standing contract If an over-all curtailment in the delivery of Soviet mili- tary equipment occurred, arms aid from Communist China could fill the gap to some extent. Even with Chinese assistance, however, Pyongyang's over-all military potential would prob- ably decline well below present levels, and it would have great difficulty over the long pull in maintaining a sufficient military counterpoise to the UN forces in South Korea. South following the ouster of the Rhee government in 1960. So far, North Korean ef- forts to capitalize on south- ern instability have achieved little in the way of tangible results. Even less successful have been Pyongyang's efforts at covert subversion in the South. Tight police and mili- tary security there have largely negated attempts to infiltrate the government and set up an underground Communist party. At present, the development of a base from which to conduct a Viet Cong - type insurgency in South Korea seems well be- yond Pyongyang's capabilities. Policy Toward South Korea Despite the strengthening and modernization of North Ko- rean forces during the past ten years, Pyongyang by itself still lacks the capability to reunify the country by force. It has nonetheless gone ahead with a program designed to lay the groundwork for the eventual ex- tension of Communist control to the South. This program in- volves a continuous campaign of political and propaganda sub- version intended to shake South Korean faith in the Seoul gov- ernment and in the durability of US support. Pyongyang pushed this approach with particular vigor to take advantage of the political instability in the There have been signs re- cently of growing public apathy and discontent in North Korea. The situation apparently stems from the tightness of regime controls and the general drab- ness of life. A rising crime rate is reported, including mis- appropriation of public funds and black marketeering. Juve- nile deliquency'has also ap- peared, especially among the youth repatriated during the last four years from Japan. The possiblity of serious public unrest appears remote. The public security forces doubt- less still constitute an all- SECRET Approved For Release 2006/11/13 : CIA-RDP79-00927AO04400020002-2 Approved r Release 2006/11/13 : CIA-RDP79-0927A004400020002-2 SECRET pervasive and effective police system. Moreover, the regime should have little difficulty in continuing to provide the basic necessities of food and livelihood for the relatively small population. The regime is, however, concerned over pub- lic attitudes, and has recently embarked on a series of propa- ganda campaigns designed to spur the populace to more conscien- tious support of its goals. So far, there are no signs of flagging elan in the party ranks. On the surface at least, the party seems satisfied with Kim Il-sung's leadership and with the progress made under his policies. Kim and most of his chief lieutenants are still young enough to look forward to ten or fifteen years of active political life. A shakeup in the top-level leadership in the party is thus unlikely in the foreseeable future. Pyongyang will probably continue its political alignment with the Chinese Communists, while remaining cautious in ex- panding the ground of its own differences with Moscow. Frus- tration of North Korean irreden- tist aims toward South Korea by the US presence there would also appear to rule out any relaxa- tion in Pyongyang's hostile policy toward the US. 25X1 SECRET Approved For Release 2006/11/13 : CIA-RDP79-00927A004400020002-2 Approved Fifr+'f'Zelease 2006/1'17T3 'Z?A-WDP79-0099M004400020002-2 Approved For Release 2006/11/13 : CIA-RDP79-00927AO04400020002-2 SECRET ease 2006/11/13 : CIA-RDP79-00927P 4400020002-2 6 March 1964 OCI No. 0321/64B Copy No. ALGERIA'S MOUNTING TROUBLES UNDER BEN BELLA CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY OFFICE OF CURRENT INTELLIGENCE SECRET C' cluded from automatic Approved For Release 2006/11/13 : CIA-RDP79-00927AO044000, o,,n ~a 9 and declassification 25X1 Approved For Release 2006/11/13 : CIA-RDP79-00927AO04400020002-2 Approved For Release 2006/11/13 : CIA-RDP79-00927AO04400020002-2 Approved For Rel a 2006/11/13: CIA-RDP79-00927AO 0020002-2 SECRET Ahmed Ben Bella has made little progress in coping with Algeria's massive problems during his 18 months in power. Unemployment is rampant, many Algerians are underfed and without adequate housing, and Ben Bella's popularity is waning. He has secured his own position, however, by steadily tightening his control over the reins of government. Ben Bella recognizes that for the present the Algerian economy must depend on France, but he is moving toward close ties with Communist countries in keeping with his proclaimed socialist orientation. Some of his ad- visers evidently would like to speed this movement. The Harvest of Independence Algeria's economy was close to chaos when the country became independent in July 1962, and matters have continued to dete- riorate. More than half of the country's labor force of 3.5 million is unemployed; one fifth of the population survives only because of American relief opera- tions. Salaries and wages of those lucky enough to be employed by the government or in the mil- itary forces are paid irregu- larly. By the end of 1963, in- dustry was reported operating at only 30 percent of capacity and,even with last year's good harvest, the vast majority of agricultural workers continued to eke out a bare existence. Part of the difficulty re- sults directly from the exodus of French administrators and businessmen. Few Algerians have the skills to fill the gap. The economy has been further dis- rupted by rapid nationalization of two thirds of all agricultural land and the haphazard seizures of many small businesses. While Ben Bella has wanted to move more slowly, he has bowed to pressures for acceleration. Last spring, although committed to nationalize only vacated agricultural properties, the government seized other substan- tial holdings when apprised that local leaders were about to take matters into their own hands. The cooperatives which were hastily organized to manage these properties have in only a few instances produced up to expectations. The government's efforts to show the mass of Algerians some of the fruits of independ- ence frequently conflict with the need to stimulate new busi- ness. Ben Bella now finds him- self caught between conflicting demands from economic advisers --including some Communist as- sociates. Many urge him to honor provisions in last year's nationalization laws which call for dividing profits among the workers. On the other hand, leaders of the General Union of Algerian Workers (UGTA), Algeria's only labor federation, believe SECRET Approved For Release 2006/11/13 : CIA-RDP79-00927A004400020002-2 Approved Fc'r Release 2006/11/13 : CIA-RDP79-0 997AO04400020002-2 SECRET that the workers in nationalized enterprises should be content just to have jobs, forgo their profit-sharing rights, and thus permit earnings of operating enterprises to be used to reopen other potentially' profitable ones. As a pacesetting example, the 600 workers in a tJGTA-directed bakers' cooperative recently de- cided that their profits of some $120,000 would be:used to reopen two plants which could employ dozens of workers. The dispute over disposition of profits has stirred bitter personal animosi- ties and opened some possibly serious rifts among the regime's supporters. The government's failure to show significant progress has cut sharply into Ben Bella's popular standing.; In contrast to the spontaneous adulation he received at the time of inde- pendence and when he achieved power, the regime now has to drum up crowds tohear him. On one recent occasion, buses ap- proaching the forum where Ben Bella was making a major address were required to discharge all passengers to constitute an audi- ence. Most soon slithered away, while those who remained were apathetic to his pronouncements. The unemployed have publicly reacted to the regime's failure to provide enoughjobs; a dem- onstration in Oran in January appears to have seriously dis- turbed Ben Bella. While he is normally conciliatory toward his critics, this time he threatened to "break the backs" of the bourgeoisie,counterrevolution- Approved For Release 2006/11/13 : CIA-RDP79-00927AO04400020002-2 aries, speculators, and all the "numerous animals" who attack his revolution. Ben Bella,who is premier as well as President, seems in little danger from active op- position, however. He has elim- inated from his regime many in- dividuals whose views conflict markedly with his own. He has imprisoned a few would-be op- position leaders or otherwise restricted their activities, but has avoided creating a martyr by executing any of them. Ferhat Abbas, the moderate former president of the Constitu- ent Assembly who had jumped on the Ben Bella bandwagon in mid- 1962, retired to semioblivion a year later when the two dis- agreed on the form of govern- ment to be provided by the con- stitution. Hocine Ait Ahmed, who shared with Ben Bella the early leadership of the Algerian rebellion and nearly six years of imprisonment, resigned from the Constituent Assembly to lead the Kabylie Berbers into open defiance when the assembly failed to respond to his warnings against personal dictatorship. Ait Ahmed has been virtually isolated in the rugged and populous Kabylie area since the defection of Col. Mohand ou el Hadj, his principal lieutenant. So far the potential op- position has remained ineffec- tive and fragmented largely be- cause individual opposition lead- ers are unable to compromise SECRET Approved For Rele 2006/11/13: CIA-RDP79-00927A0044N020002-2 SECRET their differences and concert their activities. Ben Bella relies heavily on the National Liberation Front (FLN) to consolidate his control. This coalition of nationalist groups, which was formed to di- rect the fight for independence, is named by the constitution as the country's only legal politi- cal organization. The FLN is charged with determining national policy, and Ben Bella, as secre- tary general of its political bureau, has gathered power to himself. The political bureau has four other members. Hadj ben Alla, the FLN's chief organizer and president of the Constituent Assembly, is the party's second most powerful figure. He over- sees the work of a central di- rection committee which is charged with executing top-level party policies. Two other members of the bureau are Mohamed Khider and Rabah Bitat, who until last spring were its prime movers but have since lost influence. The fifth member, Mohamedi Said, a deputy premier, also apparently does not count for much in the decision-making processes. Ben Bella continues to de- lay holding a long-promised FLN national congress to set guide- lines for a "national politico- socio-economic philosophy." Last fall he said that it would be held by March, although it is not likely at this stage to take place before April at the earli- est. He said also that all ele- ments of political opinion would be represented on the planning committee, whereas in fact none of the regime's critics is a mem- ber of the body. Position of the Army The army, whose backing en- abled Ben Bella to achieve power in September 1962, remains the backbone of his regime. Despite its demonstrated inadequacies during the border conflict with Moroccans last fall, the army has been the principal force for main- taining internal order, both against such dissidents as the Kabylie Berbers and against ur- ban demonstrators. The army's commander, Col. Houari Boumedienne, as deputy premier and defense minister, is Ben Bella's top lieutenant. He is also the most likely con- tender for ower Just as he has broken with other associates, Ben Bella is probably looking for the proper time to eliminate Boumedienne. Apparently as a step toward this end, in October he appointed a veteran guerrilla chieftain, Col. Tahar Z'biri, as army chief of staff. SECRET Approved For Release 2006/11/13 : CIA-RDP79-00927A004400020002-2 Approver Release 2006/11/13: CIA-RDP79- 27AO04400020002-2 SECRET Z'biri is reported to be an antagonist of Boumedienne, as are Col. Chaabane ;and Col. Mohand ou el Hadj, who also were brought into the general staff hierarchy last fall. It remains unclear what part each is playing in a reorganization ofthe Algerian military structure now under way. Relations With Communist Bloc Ben Bella's effort to bal- ance his country between East and West has tilted Algeria mark- edly toward the East. He pro- claims that Algeria is neither Communist nor anti-Communist and is developing its'own unique form of Arab-Islamic socialism. Never- theless he placesthis Algerian socialism "in the'tradition of the great revolutionary experi- ments of the twentieth century pioneered by the Soviet Union, Communist China, Yugoslavia, and Cuba." Many Algerian leaders, in addition to being grateful for Communist assistance in the struggle for independence, evi- dently believe that their situa- tion is similar to the earlier stages of development of those Communist countries. Ben Bella has frequently expressed affec- tion for their leaders, particu- larly for Castro., In recent months, he and most government officials have even affected the Cuban leader's mode of attire. Algeria's demonstration of friendship has brought it sub- stantial economiccredits and some military aid; from Communist countries. Moscow has granted a long-term credit of $100 mil- lion, Communist China $50 mil- lion, Yugoslavia $20 million, and Bulgaria $6 million. Sev- eral hundred technicians from Communist countries have gone to Algeria. For dramatic im- pact early this year, the USSR presented Ben Bella with an IL- 18 command aircraft; its ten- man Soviet crew will remain in Algeria for a year to train an Algerian crew. Algeria has also exchanged many official and un- official delegations with bloc nations. Much of the Algerian Army's equipment is of Soviet manufac- ture, although in large part ob- tained from Egypt. Last fall Algeria obtained armor and artil- lery direct from the USSR as well as from Egypt and for the first 25X1 time from Cuba. SECRET 4 Approved For Release 2006/11/13 : CIA-RDP79-00927AO04400020002-2 Approved For Releate 2006/11/13 : CIA-RDP79-00927A00i00020002-2 SECRET Several hundred Algerian naval and air personnel are receiving train- ing in the USSR and the European satellites. Algerian officials fre- quently appear unhappy with their experiences with Commu- nist personnel, however The propaganda value of Bulgarian doctors, for example, has been reduced because of language difficulties. Ben Bella is at the same time permitting continuation of some military training by West- ern countries: France is con- ducting a training program for several hundred military tech- nicians in Algeria, while ten Algerian naval cadets are un- dergoing long-term training in the UK. Most importantly, Ben Bella has shown a keen appreciation of Algeria's continuing reliance on France for trained personnel and for financial assistance. Under the Evian Accords of March 1962 which paved the way for Al- gerian independence, France pledged financial aid in the amount of some $200 million an- nually for three years. This year it will provide $30 million in technical assistance, plus $160 million in other aid, of which half must be used to pur- chase French goods. Present in- dications are that France will sharply curtail assistance when the three-year period expires next year. Ben Bella also realizes that France is an important out- let for Algeria's excess man- power and an important tradi- tional market for its exports. At the present time, there are more Algerians in France (nearly 500,000) than French nationals remaining in Algeria (about 180,- 000). More than 80 percent of Algeria's trade is with France. In his effort to maintain cordial relations with France, Ben Bella has been notably reti- cent about French atomic tests in the Sahara. Algerian media have made no mention of France's most recent test, and Ben Bella has taken no steps to carry out the threat he made last spring, in response to agitation aroused by a test series at that time, to renegotiate the Evian military clauses. He also has indicated that he does not intend to na- tionalize Algeria's petroleum re- sources, but is insisting that Algeria have preponderant con- trol over a third pipeline which is to be constructed to move Al- gerian crude. Ben Bella, moreover, is pro- moting ties with other Western nations, and has concluded ne- gotiations for economic develop- ment aid from Britain, West Ger- many, and the US. The Algerians are also seeking to diversify SECRET Approved For Release 2006/11/13 : CIA-RDP79-00927AO04400020002-2 Approvedr Release 2006/11/13: CIA-RDP79-0A004400020002-2 SECRET their trading relationships in Europe, especially by extending contacts with other Common Mar- ket countries. 'Ben Bella, in fact, would like special as- sociation arran,ements with the Common Market, if not actual membership. despite the current air of rec- onciliation. Bourguiba, for his part, has alleged Algerian complicity in an assassination attempt against him. Differ- ences have been smoothed over in recent months, but Bourguiba probably will still look askance at his larger neighbors. Position Among African States Of all foreign leaders, Nasir appears to be the one who has made the greatest impression on Ben Bella. Fen Bella's con- cept of nonalignment appears close to that of Nasir. Although some misadventures during Nasir's visit to Algiers last May tem- porarily disturbed the relation- ship, Egypt responded with alac- rity to Algeria''s requests for aid last fall when the Kabylie dissidence and the border fight- ing with Morocco broke out. Ben Bella's aspirations to the leadership of a federated North Africa have fallen far short of fulfillment, however. Relations with the two leaders whose cooperation would be nec- essary,, Tunisia's President Bourguiba and Morocco's King Hassan, have been beset with mutual suspicion and recrimina- tion. Hassan suspects that Ben Bella supports Moroccan re- publican elements, some of which have taken refuge in Al- geria, Bitterness from last fall's border clashes will trou- ble relations for.some time, Ben Bella has continued helping liberation movements in the African dependent areas, mainly Portuguese, by furnish- ing arms, training facilities, and some funds. He recently reiterated his willingness to send some 10,000 Algerian troops to assist in the liberation of Portuguese Africa. Despite these steps, he has not received the continent-wide recognition as an African statesman that he apparently covets. Unless removed by assassina- tion or incapacitated by serious illness, Ben Bella seem likely to maintain his pre-eminent power position and may even tighten his authority. There is, how- ever, a vast reservoir of un- solved problems which would-be rivals could exploit, and a fur- ther loss of popularity seems indicated as the economy con- tinues to flounder. In any event, dissident groups will continue to appear and inter- mittent disorders seem likely. SECRET Approved For Release 2006/11/13 : CIA-RDP79-00927A004400020002-2 Approved For Rele 2006/11/13 : CIA-RDP79-00927A000020002-2 SECRET Meanwhile, there is the like- lihood of a further leftward drift. many of his advisers are much more prone than Ben Bella him- self to cultivate the friend- ship of Communist states. Among them are Mohamed Harbi, editor of the Communist-oriented Rev- olution Africaine and leading theorist of the regime, Michel Raptis, architect of the worker- management policy, and Mohamed Lebdjaoui, a government and FLN official who emerged as spokesman during the visit of a high-level delegation to the USSR. Despite Ben Bella's desire to keep open SECRET the doors to the West, pres- sures from such advisers are likely to increase his already heavy reliance on bloc sources for technical and financial as- sistance. Further clarification of Ben Bella's intentions may soon appear. In addition to his cur- rent visit to Belgrade (5 to 12 March), he has indicated that he expects this spring to visit the Soviet Union, where he is likely to conclude arrangements for use of the $100-million credit. Approved For Release 2006/11/13 : CIA-RDP79-00927AO04400020002-2 Approver Release 2009f'f'11'1~'` IDP79-0 7AO04400020002-2 Approved For Release 2006/11/13 : CIA-RDP79-00927AO04400020002-2 SECR E T