A VISIT TO THE SIBERIAN COMPUTER CENTER, NOVOSIBIRSK, USSR (3 JULY - 15 AUGUST 1975)

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP79-00798A001000100013-2
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 10
• Document Creation Date: December 9, 2016
• Document Release Date: July 18, 2000
• Sequence Number: 13
• Publication Date: August 15, 1975
• Content Type: REPORT

-"" V ?
thf,/
A V its pp rromdifornReleambitTIQO 9106rzIQ IAERnentav ameagt000loo o 13-2u GusT 1975)
by STATINTL
Eddie N. Bernard, Lt.(jg), NOAA Corps
STATINTL
*DOC Exemption Letter In EUR File*
I. introduction
1-?
STATINTL
This report describes my participation in the Scientific /Exchange Program under
the US/USSR Agreement on Environmental Protection as frife.d,during the first
meeting of experts of the US/USSR on Integration o Tsunami Wiruing Systems held
2-7 December 1974. (A copy of the record of discus.).:b7ri 1., included at the end
of this report.) My contribution to the program was to perform numerical hydro-
dynamical computations of tsunamis interacting with the Kuril Islands at the
Siberian Computer Center in Novosibirsk, USSR. The length of my visit was from
3 July to 15 August 1975. From 3 July to 7 July I was in Moscow discussing the
objectives of my visit to Novosibirsk with S. L. Soloviev and V. M. Popov. This
report describes the meetings in Moscow, as well as my visit to Novosibirsk.. In
particular, the objectives that were accomplished, the exchange we received .from
the Russians, the working and living conditions, the treatment by the hosts, and
my personal conclusions will be discussed.
11. Moscow Meeting
My wife, Shirley, and I arrived at the Moscow airport on 3 July where we were
met by a colleague of S L. Soloviev. This gentleman escorted us to the Hotel
Warsawa and established a meeting with Professor Soloviev, V. M. Popov, V. K.
Gusakov, Y. E. Kazakov, and an interpreter at the Hydrometeorological Headquarters.
The first part of the meeting was concerned with clarifying several points about
the expedition off the Kuril Islands Commencing 1 August 1975. Since I could not
answer some of the questions, I telephoned G. R. Miller of the Joint Tsunami
Research Effort, Honolulu to resolve the problems. Specifically, I relayed the
following questions for-V. M. Popov.
1) Of what country is D. Y. Shinmoto (an assistant of R. R. Harvey during
the expedition) a citizen?
2) What is the itinerary of R. R. Harvey after the expedition?
3) When will -Dr. G. R. Miller arrive in Sakhalin?
Also, three changes made by the Soviets were relayed.
1) The Soviet ship, was to remain at sea from 1 August to 30 September 1975
around the southern Kuril Islands.
A
2) The Soviets requested that Dr. Harvey remain aboard ship until 30 Septembeli
to handle the instrumentation and equipment of the expedition.
3) The Soviets requested an instrumentation list for equipment brought into
the USSR.
?,
..,..Appr.oved.for...Release200.0/09/0.6_ , ;..,ciA7RDP79-0,0798A001O0Pi00013-?
TheAlso8idtWoPfReleasele000/09/06 ve114-13DP7194007926490d 0.001 9901t312roi ect
Profes'sor Soloviev explained that a. large tsunami had occurred in the southern
Kuril Islands on 20 June. Hp, therefore, wanted the project to emphasize this
portion of the island chain. I showed the members of the committee a preliminary
model I had programmed in Honolulu. Figure 1 shows the area modeled and the grid
size, while Figure 2 shows the discretized form of the model with an initial
disturbance in the center. The data from which I created the gridded bathymetry
was from H.O. chart 96000. This chart, however, is of low resolution (especially
close to the islands), so I therefore requested a more detailed set of charts
would be available in Novosibirsk.. Next we went over the list of objectives I
'hoped to accomplish during my six weeks in Novosibirsk. (This list is located on
page 6.) All members of the committee agreed that these objectives should be
pursued. Professor Soloviev added that he wanted any results from this work to.
be published jointly by the US/USSR.
The third part of the meeting was concerned with my living in Novosibirsk. I was
given 400 rubles (40 days per diem) and was told the Soviet government would pay
for my accommodations. I- would, however, have to pay for all my wifecs expenses.
To this I agreed and the meeting was closed.
V. K. Gusakov, who attended the meeting as a representative of the Siberian Computer
Center in Novosibirsk, acted as our host in Moscow. He guided my wife and I around
Moscow and took us to the Moscow Circus and the ballet at the Palace of Congresses
within the Kremlin. On 7 July he escorted us to Novosibirsk on Aeroflot Airlines.
At the suggestion of Dr.. W. .Brown on the State Department, I contacted the U.S.
Embassy inMoscow on 4 July. I talked briefly to Egon Loebner, Science and .
Technology Specialist, about my visit and objectives of the joint project. I gave
him the address and telephone number of the Siberian Computer Center. Upon my
return from Novosibirsk on 15 August, I again contacted him and informed him of the
details of my visit to Novosibirsk.
III. Novosibirsk
The easiest way to summarize the events of the six weeks in Novosibirsk is to
explain certain, areas in detail. For clarification, the scientific community of
Akademgorodok, located 30 km from Novosibirsk, was the location of the Siberian
Computer. Center. It was in this. small community that we stayed for six weeks. To
avoid confusion, whenever Novosibirsk is referred to, it is actually Akademgorodok.
The following breakdown can be read in sections or in entirety as each section is
independent of the others.
A. Accomplishments
A simple way to discuss the accomplishments is to refer to the list of
objectives on page .6. The number of objectives will correspend to the
numbers of explanations below.
ft
1) Two numerical models simulating tsunamis in the Kuril Islands were
run on the BESM-6 computer at the Siberian Computer Center. The first
model was a duplication of the model run in Honolulu. This served as a.
test between the IBM 370/65 and the BESM-6 for accuracy, execution time,
Aippeolied -For- Reidate-2000/091Cr6 CIA=RDP79=00798A001;000t00013-2-
4nd as a check on th- program modifications. The BJ - is kAe-tpAt.h as
Apiirs6Ved Otit kg4eiNe-0000f09/06anCUAGRDRIEVAT9PAW OW til,/ t?i76. imi t a-
tion required some modification in the original model, but by 17 July we had
the model running on the BESM-6. The next logical step was to begin construc-
tion of the southern Kuril Island model. This required the acquisition of
higher resolution bathymetric charts that were promised in Moscow. Not until
5 August did we receive such charts which entailed working many extra hours
to have the southern Kuril Island model before 15 August. We were successful
and the second Kuril model.is shown in Figure 3. This .model has a 2.5 km
grid with 4488 grid points representing the area of Shakata, Kunashu, and
part of Hokkaido.
During the interlude of 17 July and 5 August, we worked on the initial condi-
tion problem for locally generated tsunamis. A numerical model of tsunami
generation created by V. K. Gusakov and A. S. Alekseev provided us with the
sea surface deformation created by an underwater earthquake. We tested
various types of earthquake parameters such as orientation with respect to
the Kuril Trench, magnitude, and initial earth displacement. Finally, we
chose a 100 km vertical dip-slip fault oriented parallel to the Kuril Trench
in the same geographical position of the 20 July 1975 tsunami. Using the sea
surface deformation at a time 50 seconds after the earthquake occurred
provided us with the initial condition for the tsuanmi interaction models.
2) The models were not actually used to help design the field experiment
because the tsunami of 20 June gave a stronger indication of tsunami activity.
The emphasis was on the southern Kuril Islands without the aid of the numeri-
cal models.
3) The models were used to describe response characteristics to locally
generated tsunamis. The output from the codes which I ran are now being
compared with actual observations in the Kurils. There was not enough time
to consider remotely generated tsunamis.
-4) A five-minute 16 mm movie .of the Siberian Computer Center facilities
and the people with whom I worked was filmed by V. K. Gusakov. This film
will be brought to the Joint Tsunami Research Effort by Gusakov when he comes
to Hawaii.
Not enough work wA. accomPlished during my six week's visit to merit a
publication. The beginnings of a detailed tsunami study were initiated and
hopefully interest will emerge from both sides to follow through.
B. Exchange
returned the following to JTRE in honolulu.
1) V. K. Gusakov's program of water suface deformation description by
the generating underwater earthquake (This program provides initial conditions
for present numerical tsunami models and provides a tool for examing different
types of tsunami sources.) A
2) Bathymetric data used in the southern Kuril Island model (This data
will be useful in creating future models of the area. Since the Kurils have
a high occurrence of tsunamis, it is a potential model area to compare models
to nature.)
pprov fR el e'g-2000/09/176-:- CtA
'-RDPM-00798A001-0004-00043-2 ?
? A p proVed Rio n Re lea seittanalg 6t ATP PiPor) 9619 7(9-13 WI 1 MAP m-2writteil
by Y. I. Shokin and L. E. Chebarov (Ibis program will be useful in comparing
linear vs. nonlinear modeling.)
C. Working Conditions
1) Many people, fortunately, at the Siberian Computer Center spoke
fluent English since neither my wife nor myself spoke any Russian.
2) I was assigned a large office close to the library. L. E. Chebarov
and V. K. Gusakov assisted me in learning the use of the BESM-6 and in .
utilizing the other facilities. L. E. Chebarov was instrumental in helping
me overcome the program changes. Without his dedication, I probably would
not have been able to make the models work.
3) The largest problem I faced in my six week exchange was the turn-
around time of the BESM-6 computer. I average two runs a day while at
Novosibirsk. This slow return from the computer severely retarded the
debugging of programs and execution of running programs.
4) The second largest problem was the keypunch machines. These machines
punched a binary code along a row instead of a column (like IBM) and printed
no symbols on the card itself. To verify the card punched, one had to punch
a second card as a check. If the two cards matched, one assumed they were
correct; if not, one assumed one card was mispunched. Since nothing was
printed on the card itself, it was diffucult to insert a card in the proper
place in the deck. To avoid positioning problems, one had to number the cards.
5) The Siberian Computer Center has a Benson plotter but, while I was
there, there was no working software to make plots. .For this reason, the
output from my models had to be plotted by hand.
In conclusion, the people were vei-y helpful and willing to work extra hours
to get the project completed, but the computer system had several technical
disadvantages which impaired our progress.
D. Living Conditions
My wife and I lived .in a. two-bedroom furnished apartment similar to those of
the other scientists living in Novosibirsk. The apartment was equipped With
a refridgerator, radio, and television. The community was located 2 km from
the shores of the Ob Sea (a large lake) which provided a resort. atmosphere.
Also, the community was built within a forest so hiking trails were abundant.
There were two restaurants, a movie theater, and bars for entertainMent.
My wife, who has a Bacheloes degree in education, was asked to teach a
conversational English class. She held a 3-hour session each day for four
weeks to help the scientist A at the Computer Center become more fluent in
English conversation. fler class of ten students enabled her (and, as a result,
me) to get much closer to the scientists there.
Approved EQr-RgleaPqn,Q919910.0 PIA713P.P79,-P971?,ig101990100913,-?,_,
E. Treatment by nos
Approved For ReleaseV000/09/06 : CIA-RDP79-00798A691000100013-2
The people WG worked with were very hospitable. We were invited into the
homes of Y. I. Shokin and V. K. Gusakov.- We went on some excursions
together and enjoyed their friendship immensely. We were taken to a film
festival, an art show, a ballet, and several banquets. A Russian picnic on
an island in the Ob Sea proved to be an unforgetable experience. V. K.
Gusakov helped us with problems of living in Novosibirsk. His patience and
efforts made our stay much more enjoyable than if we had had to depend on.
our Berlitz!
F. Conclusions
I feel that the visit to Novosibirsk was successful in executing what we
originally planned. We accomplished the important objectives and learned
valuable information about the BESM-6 system. I feel that future trips,
where American numerical modelers might go to the Siberian Computer Center,
should only be taken realizing that the facilities available are less
advanced than most modern US facilities. From my experience at other US
computer facilities (especially the National Center for Atmospheric Research),
it is apparent that more work could be accomplished with less time and effort
at a US computer facility.. My suggestion is. that the Russians bring their
tsunami data (bathymetric, runup, and other pertinent data) to one. of our
computer facilities and do the numerical modeling on US machines. The time
and expense saved by not having to convert an existing program to fit the
BESM-6 could be used to do more of the problem. The exchange could be to
introduce the codes running on US machines to the Soviets and lot them
return with programs they could modify for their machines. In this manner,
all the time spend by US experts will be in solving the scientific problem,
not in _learning about a computer system 5-10 years old.
I also feel that the opportunity to participate in this exchange program has
been one of the greatest experiences of my life (my wife's also). ?I learned
great respect for the hardworking Russian people I associated with and I
lope that exchange programs similar to this one continue to exist so that
both countries can work together to solve mutual problems. Certainly in the
area of tsunamis, the RuSsians have much to contribute in a scientific
understanding of the problem.
ft
lkekai'e 2'000109706"Yerk-RDP79:00798A001p00-11)001-3-4'
r"
Approved For Relea4ttri
Weiii)giUrWar
,..00798A901000100013-2
Objectives of Visit
I) To conduct research utilizing numerical hydrodynamical models
especially of the Kuril Islands on the BESM-6 computer at the
Novosibirsk Computer Center, USSR
2) To use the models to determine tsunami characteristics within
the island system to aid in the design of the field experiment
to be conducted in August 1975
3) To use the model to determine response characteristics of the
Kuril Island system to locally and remotely generated tsunamis
4) As a second priority task, to document photographically (16 mm)
this portion of the Cooperative Tsunami Research Project for
use in a movie of the entire pr.oject
Responsibility of Executing Objectives
Objectives 1, 2, and 3 will be carried out by E. N. Bernard on the
BESM-6 computer in Novosibirsk, USSR. He will work cooperatively
with the staff of Professor A. S. Alekseev, Director, Siberian
Computer Center. Objective 4. may be carried out with assistance
from photographers at the Siberian Computer Center with the under-
standing that the film will be used as part of a documentary film
of the entire project. The Joint Tsunami Research Effort will
compile the movie and give copies to each component involved in the
Cooperative Research Project. 'Plus, a result of calculations will
be published jointly for both the USSR and US.
ft
Approved For Release 2000/09/06 : CIA-RDP79-00798A001000100013-2
-
Approved For Release 2000/09/06 : CIA-RDP79-00798A001000100013-2
N5C 50"?V?
KUTIL ISLANDS
771-7
77r:1:1
-r
771-17,
150'
?,)
6 ?
Approved For Release 27-)i)t09/06 : CIA-RDP79-00798A001000100013-2
NZ? 5'
1C;t7
? o
155w
. ? ?
? 11.U-1-LUAU
LLLLILLLL'
LL .LLL ...
LL.LLLL
..Apprciied .1111:000004e39.91Mtg?7.P1?0,17,13
? ? ? ? -
' LI
LL..LL
LL..LL
LLL
? ? ?
LI
LL
LL
Lt
LL
LL
LLL
I
. ? ?
.......
ILL
P
tr ? ? 60 ? re LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
L
La L
" L
L"
...
0 1
'5cC51
377a
?)22
??
? ? ?
?
,???? ..... ?LLL
LLL
;
LLL
LL
LLLL
....... LLL
LLL
LIL
LLL
LL
LL
? ? ?
LLLL
LLLLL
LLLLLL
'LLLLLL
LLLLLLLLL
LLLLLLLLLLL
LLULLLL 07p,o0798A00-1-000-1-000173-4
L,LLuL LLL
IL
1.0000000004040OLLOLLM-0000700000000. .0,..000?4LLL1-1-1-L.- 4004-006.01;
?LLLL ? LL.LLLL
?
I. 0 00410 0.000 00 4041.LLLO 00000 40000001 I ?46.000?0?0?? 045 r-.5;..1, 0:000z
1
1 " LL
Io?6 4.60..0 000001-L0 a LI.. ? 0 o o o 04002000
LL..LL
I ?00 9 00 0 0 0 0 4 0 400 I. L00000004 0000000 I
LL 1
7
00 000 0000 0 0 0 ?
10 0000 00 00 0?20 00 Olt-40000
T LL T
1 ..... 00?0000?0001-L00000000004000400-
I
1 LL I
1000 0 4 00 0 0 ? 4 ? 0 00 .L1-0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 004 0 0 ? T 6
T LLL
I 00410 400?0 0 C O? 0 OLLO 4 0040 00 44 0 40 00400 .
1 LLL
4 40 CO 006
I ................................. 0 4 I
1 LL,
10,.....1.0.00,014.4LL00904000Q.094.9004)00401
L
7 'L 000000
LL
.... 0"0.0000L1-410000006
30
00?0000000 0001
00 000 00,10000
1..00600..6000000
I0000C0000C0000D000003,,,0.........
IC000r,COCJL:OLLL000UU000u00
I000000000OLLL 000300000........
70060600000aL 000(.00C
1000 OLLL1 11 0000000.00.00
10 1.11% 11 000000
10 1I I 11.11 .,. 1
I 0i-i-900,11, 1 0r:0000
I 0-i4..---+.$ II 00000..0.0
I 0G:r.-..-..--- 11
I 0---0 .3----0 11 00000
I . 0-4-4-?2----1%-1 11
I 0,F, ' 01i1
10 114ii--0 11
103 1111 2 1 Ilitpc!cwoo.......
OvI
10300 00 11 1
1000000000000KLL1
IC060C00)000ld.000!
I00on00ooLLL--
1.0 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 00 00 .40 00 0 0 0000 000 06000 0 0 I
I 1
lame. 00 a 00 000 04 0 LI- I. ..., .. 0 0000 0000600T
a LLL T
I
1600 0 400 ?00000 OLLL000000090000000 000 1
I LLL I
1.??.....9.....LLL,,......470.0.0.0I
,
1 "....LI. T
1.0.000000.00000LL0000000004000000041
II
I0000660400000:
160004000000,000000I
I La 1 LL 7
Io,o0oloo00000000LULLLo00909oo0000001
I Lt.:J.1AL I
I. ...... O? 0014 ?0 LLLI-LLLLLo 04 4 0000 000 :
LLLLLLLLLLL I
1 - .. I
100400
0000 ?000?0 ?OOLLLL.909. ? ?0
L LL
1.06,00?000.000??OLLO01.1-600,000? ? 40 De ft Di
LLL
1?90 00 000?002000 ?LL4 0 00004 00 0000004 01
LL
I?000? 44 0.14000 0?01.1.4 0 000 0 00000600041
LL
10.4040
LL
?
I000000"0000000LLLoo0.0o0o?oe?ooco0i
100J00000.00
IC0)N700:).)
ICO00000.,;000
,I0OUC100U)00...,LL00000%0000.......00T
I000C0t)000)00uLL000000000.00.00.1
100:.)000000)000LL
00 ?? 4000 04 OLLoo40004 00?040000? 1
6o o LLLO 0 0 00.0 ? ?? 0 00000001
0400'60003CI:CI0oo0000o0000:
? ? L 71r )..11. P.)
...,:::i
I(13,(J22)
.)01 C.);)0,..1
IG,GOPO 1J
00
1-7
0')."1.;.:11 ILLL----E1=,40 ZI
Iee{:'---O LLL v ot;o0
Q
ocro:
cruto:
T176'O;
-"e;
L'.:, .--C.
)
"-.i
- CO
? 7!0.:!v '-,-!
0000000 ----?= CO!!
-itVV 121 --, !!I!
?!:
? " - ...,_;-,:, ,-- --4 -:,- :!-;),..:71I
0 ? C:'.)
,
: --3:, ,-,4--,,-11JCOI
1;3.0t7:2,111 : 1 C 1 1 -; 1 .00;;Ci-:.:,Of
0:1.il..1.:;7:7
ItIr.,;-:121 --77f) ?7 1 v11 k.r)-:;.!!
111 ',11: , 11 00000-3I
,
I. Cd?Q
I.
10410 0
ICi..00000000
I000000000000.0
100:2,0 00200
10000 0000c;-)6
7CjL;U0000000
100060000C263..
I00000G000u...
100..) 000000
10000 00000
1000000301
10000000
,1 7
LLL.7=77.7.:0O 1
LL----.;0 11 0:).)0000...1
LL00000 11 0000....T
LLL 1 .0000000
LLL1111 0000000
OLL 000-)00:::0
6C,:i00G00()C0C00
00000007'1-y10
.iLLLnLoc,pc,
L'L
.LLL
L'
LL
LL....
LLLL
LLL LI.
LLLLLL
L'LLLLL
LLLULLLL .
LLLLLLLLLLL
Figure Computer simulation of tsunami generated by an earthquake in the central Kurils.
Approved For Release 2000/09/06 : CIA-RDP79-00798A001000100013-2
Approved For Release 2000/09/06 : CIA-RDP79-00798A001000100013-2
,
ISEAMPLITUDcCOCUr,FOW THPAOMuMr. 10.00000-01 CoRfIr.nPUM0INtl TO?S Mr;OL 9 AND;Wi TH Oi. i3ANO.:=:
. r
, .,: , '?:;:55556?03,
. .. ......
.? . -
.. ,
, 11111,111/111111111111111111 ,0000000000qt.,,!!,L.;...,,?..?,.7
! 1111111111111111111111111/1111 00000000P.i. !
I 11111111111111111111111111 .1/1 .9000000,,!!!.4tio 4 CIT
1111111111111111111111111111.1 , li '000t0004,4",
1111111111111111111111i 1 1 22 1 ,copopo.,..:4. ITI-11.0.!
11111/11111111i111111111 .2 -221.1....,foo000.*44,? . rrixraLLIALT
I1111111111111i11111110, 12 3 2 1 0000044. ' A.*pLLLLLLLLLLI,LLLT
1111111111111111.1111111 01 :5 122()042qP0.,4*Ai
, -LL LLLLLUALLLT
11111111111141111.1? l L323
ii11111113.111i, 1 .10 3 .12,0000? ,
6!... ....! !'? LL 04.,"!,LLLLLLLI
t1- a
I11 11. .1 0 AR74543100000;i4?,
1.11
2 111 .a0 :Rs
I 0 n .Q 54'2 00000.'1,..4;
[, 00 E. 434 00060.EtA
( ,_. .R11 31. 000"..;,.:: --6.!%!..#!4i4
.1 ' .11131 .3.'2 3 OO '?.A'4'$? ... *
111 2.,11
22222
11 . -11.1 LLLLL 1 _ LLLL
111111
00 000000000000 ka.IA?Tk!.1 A4 k -LLLL
.44.4?4444444pePp,A1.,
I'
0000000G0000000000.?,
' k.41b.pppips4 44 'Pi.! 4 4i4`4.*
., ,.. .
0000000000P000 ...... 4.44??li. .... ..ii ,i,,,,.+.?
oc000po'
110 J1 4 00000 .
ci)
,.(t:,,,??.t?A/tw?????.". LLLLLL!.
./,...?!;...c46,??????????,,,LLILLLT
;4-1 1 '.1' .... f 4' . .4 ... ? ; .. . LLLLLLT
,..?4,,:;:??.,..,....:?. LLLLLLLLT
LLLLLLLLT.
LLLLLT
? ..4 .0 4 46
LLI
LI
LT ?
4.44.4 ? ? Lt
t
? 6 ??? 44, 'LL T.? -
"it Lt ?
.t?.1.4,4?,z_ ?
,....,?.. 10-7
'ULU'
... ?-.. i?& ?ft LLLLLT
LLLL..404.0...., LULLLT
LLLI?.4
4 .. ! . ik, i LLIAL' pi
-011$ i 444, 4146,i 4 44 4.19.J.14 . i .. LLLLL . ..i.i?...i?,...ILLLL
4 ? ? 4 4 .. 4 i A 1 A,Ir ? ? 4 A 4 6.? 4A 4 A IA4 4 AL AL4LL ... ,.? ? .44 . 4 .4 ... .pP,.. LLLL ?? Y67
'.-.'
4...t044.4 4 d $
? 4' 4-4 ,?? ? ? ? ? .....
.4?;: LLLLLEALLLI, ?...?.!, " 4 ? 140 ? ? ??
;#.,. .. ? .. ????.i.f LLLLLLLLLLL 4????{4t ...*. . .i.f
.4. .!,1?.,LILkLLLLIALL
r!4? . .. 7 ?
Y-4!46.#1p4K.440044LLLLL t 4 4 4, A ...... . 4 i 4 4. .. i ... ' .. 4 p ?!!
. i a s 4 ...... ? ? 4 ? 4 ? ?,4.? . LLL ??,;?.,;???1?,....???? ,??? ..a..04.?417
o ? ?di
LLLLL1.1 ... Cieet,.
1. . . 4 ?4 . II** ? .? ? 4
441 ? ? ? 4 ? ?? t ? 4 A 4,4, # II ? ? ? a ..... # ? ? # .4 ? 7
, . ? .
fr' .d;t4169,44444444w#.4.4,
1..,,, L1..1.1.1.11;604: .
... ; . ??,,,,?4??444:4:44,6,0;1146#44.? 9?Al.i4,?,4-4,4,44.6
#4f LLLLLLLI
. . ? ? ? ? # .4 ? 44. ; 4 4 44 ; ; ? ; ? ; ; ; ? ; 4.; 4 ? ? '4 ? '? ? ? ???4 ? .? 4 4. 4 4 t .
ebt?d-4.?."...L
. Lie ? igf
1- 'Of D'19 i6 -
3,. q2 ILI7Q3P6-
q. N prs'g 6
Approved For Release 2000/09/06 : CIA-RDP79-00798A001000106013-2
(41 '
Approved For Releasai2000/09/06 : CIA-RDP7dipitOKIR100010
Itinerary - Dr. V. V. Ez
April 6, 1976
April 7
April 8-19.
April 20
April 20-30
April 30
April 30-May 17
May 17-21
May 22-May 31
May 31
June 1
June 2
Ar. Washington, D.C. (from Moscow)
Lv. Washington, D.C. via TWA 63
Ar. San Francisco, CA
U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA
Lv. San Francisco via PSA 172
Ar. Burbank, CA
California Institute of Technology
Clarence R. Allen
? University of California, Santa Barbara
John C. Crowe.11
Lv. Santa Barbara via UA 388
Ar. San Francisco
11"--1-,02.
cr?P'-z"-"'
U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA
Field trip to Nevada with Robert E. Wallace
U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA
Lv. San Francisco via TWA 44
Ar. New York (Kennedy)
Hotel: Algonquin Hotel
59 W. 44th Street, New York
,Lv. New York (Kennedy) via Aeroflot
ft
City
312
5:40 p.m.
8:38 p.m.
8:45 a.m.
9:40 a.m.
8:00 a.m.
8:48 a.m.
10:00 p.m.
6:12 a.m.
9:30 p.m.
Approved For Release 2000/09/06 : CIA-RDP79-00798A001000100013-2