Study on Criteria for Promotability List
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP79-00317A000100020037-8
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
S
Document Page Count:
2
Document Creation Date:
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date:
January 22, 1998
Sequence Number:
37
Case Number:
Content Type:
MEMO
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
CIA-RDP79-00317A000100020037-8.pdf | 46.63 KB |
Body:
SECRET
Approved F.p,C'Release')Q3/oNA-RDP79-00A000100020037-8
SUBJECT: Study on Criteria for Promotability List
b.
Professional Experience
GS Points
Equivalent per Year
Max.. No. Max.
of Years. Points
Jr. Engineer or Scientist
7 -
1
2
2
9
1
2
2
Jr. Engineer or Scientist
11
1
3
3
Engineer
12
2
3
6
peri~nze $e,N 6e~' 1uP6R
13
2
3
6
Years in Grade
2
3
6
c. Performance Rating (Division Chief)
W -
0 Points
A -
10 "
P -
15
S -
20
0 -
25 "
d. General Impression on Panel Members
In the competitive evaluation, the first three elements,
education and training, professional experience, and
supervisor's rating, would all be taken from the individual's
personnel folder. The fourth category - general impression
on Panel members - would be derived at the scheduled Panel
meeting for the appropriate grade.
5. Promotability List
At the April, August, and December Panel meetings, the
Promotability List for all ORD personnel would be reviewed; it is still
recommended that a Division Chief make a promotion recommendation
whenever he deems it appropriate. Recommendation and consideration
Approved For Release 2006EY S : DtfP79-00317A000100020037-8
SECRET
SECRET
Approved F@ReleasjffOOIA-RDP79-003, jA000100020037-8
, fif
should be a two-month process. The D/ORD's recommendation is
strongly endorsed that there be no minimum time in grade criteria for
a promotion.- the qualified is thus not held back and the unqualified is
no encouraged to raise the point periodically.
EY S 0EY
Approved For Release 2006/03/T6 : IA- 9-00317A000100020037-8
SEC
SUBJECT: Study on Criteria for Promotability List