SUMMARY OF PROBABLE LONG RANGE SAM LAUNCH COMPLEXES USSR

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: NGA Records (Formerly NIMA)
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: T
• Document Page Count: 42
• Document Creation Date: December 28, 2016
• Document Release Date: October 27, 2003
• Sequence Number: 27
• Publication Date: July 1, 1967
• Content Type: REPORT

lease 2003/12/19 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
PHOTOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATION REPORT
~~~~~G
,~G
.SUMMARY OF PROBABLE
LONG RANGE SAM
LAUNCH COMPLEXES
USSR
(I JULY 1967)
25X1
SEPTEMBER 1967
COPY ,1, ~, 6
51 PAGES
25X1
Declass Review by NIMA/DOD
GROUP 1: EXCLUDED FROM
AUTOMATIC DOWNGRADING
AND DECLASSIFICATION
Approved For4~ea~~~12/19 :CIA-RDP78T04759A00~~'300010027-8
 25X1 gpproved For Release 2003/12/19 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
 Apprq
ved For Relea~oPO~~~~~:
SUMMARY OF PROBABLE
LONG RANGE SAM
LAUNCH COMPLEXES
USSR
JULY 1967)
Approved For Rele~i~2~'~1T9I: CIA-RDP78T04~59A00730001
25X1
~~~a
 O
5X1
Approved For Release 2003112119 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
U TIED KINGDOM ~ 1 40
60 90 10
0 120 140 160
ALA
NORTH
~
t
SEA i?
?9 b
,? a 9
~?' NORWAY
9
-
/~
dQ~ ~ o
r.C
FEDERA N.. ~r~ V../~.~.~
~ t'
a~
~ ~
CERMANYO t,.,+"9. SWEDEN f L
r j
~
r
o V
r
1 GEiLRANY ed g ~` ~ BARENTS
_
?
EAST SIBERIAN
/
~
d
ti~rr FINLAND %~ SEA
/
~
SEA a'
~ 180
M ? Lie ?p essaare
~
d
?
/
S POLAN ? I l i nn
i
~ai ~ngrad ??~ \~
'
? o
LAPTEV
~
o
ti ~/
~ _ ~~`
rv nin ra
~ KARA
20
; ~ ~ I n $ k
a
sEA
~a
, r,
SW C3
sEA
/' i k~4 i n
..
?
ra
/
,
BERING
~,
~
Babayevo ~ ? Plesetsk~ ~
?
o
Borshchev
~~``
~~
sEA
,
`;`? a tni~t, erepovets ~ ~
i
~
~ 'Ki ev ? ?
5~ ~ ozhaysk.
~
~
~ Kos oma ~
MOSKVA?
?
~
t y
here lavl-Zale s ie
~
?
~
? urashi
~
~
arya o"
~
~~
~ re iki
---
--
?~
160
, hnyay Tura
'
v?~
sEa
a
Fe os
osto Volga izhniy Tagil
~'
a
r
of ?~
BLACK ?
sEa Igograd ? Kapustin Yar erdlovsk
~~
~
P~~?
OKHOTSK p
?
o-
~
'? ?Chelyabins' 06
?~
o
TUR Y) Tomsk ?
?
~
~~,
?
~ e
~
Krasno
rsk
Kh
b
k
.
arovs
a
IRAQ?) `-~
Laka
Balka!
uzhn P?
$
r ARALo Tyuratam
f~ ssA ?
Ang
~~
rsk
`~
S ali sk
cP Sary-Shagan ..-?
????~-?
r
'
2?
~?
~
Lake ~,
?
??
~
Vladivostok
?
Bafkhash ,?
~,J
1
~ "
t
~
CHINA
mo
MO
NGOLIA
~
~
sEA of
IRAN ~ 1.
,1
.
.,'
/\
?
.,
~
/
JAPAN
I,.
v..J .e.I..I"?/?
L
.
~./
r
KOREA ~ 140
r
CHINA
.
,`.?
./
??~..~
'-
r4
~
,
APCxANISTAN ~,; ob
able long ra
ge SAM launc
xes
r ~~~jPAKISIPN lam~mu \
Boundaries are not neceun.il~- those
PIC
a n
?
60 r'' Kzehml~ ~ r cognized by the U.S. 6~vernmenc
fsi.w. ~~ ai,?w.)
10
0 N
L"9551
120
FIGURE 1. DEPLOYMENT OF PROBABLE LONG RANGE SAM LAUNCH COMPLEXES, USSR.
Approved For Release 2003112119 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
25X1
25X1
 ~praNed For Release 2003/12/19 : CI
TOP SECRET
INTRODUCTION
t?5X1
This summary report presents a construction chronology and the status of .
41 probable long range SAM (PLRS) complexes as of (Figure 1). 25X1 D
All complexes discovered following the cut-off date of this photography are
reported in cables and photographic interpretation briefs, and will be included
in subsequent summary reports. Figures 2 and 3 depict the construction starts
and the categories of PLRS complexes. An annotated photograph of each com-
plex is included in Figures 4-44, and 1 typical air-warning radar facility with
associated unidentified areas is shown in Figure 45. Figure 46 depicts a PLRS
launch position at Moskva SAM Site E24-3.
Discussion in this report, excluding current information, is limited to that
information extracted from Table 1 and photography. 25X1
Users of the table are cautioned t a e a es listed are first observation
on photography and should not be construed as the initial construction or equip-
ment installation dates. Analysis of the chronology indicates various components
were constructed simultaneously, i.e., missile-handling area, support area, air-
warning radar facility. This conclusion should be tempered, as a complex may
not have been observed in its initial stages but first identified in a mid-stage of
construction. Some dates refer to modifications of existing facilities to accommo-
date the Tallinn system.
Each complex is listed by year and month when construction was first
observed on photography.
CURRENT INFORMATION
PLRS equipment has been identified in storage at 10 locations. Eight storage
areas are at SAM support facilities (Kirov, Chelyabinsk, Irkutsk, Vladivostok 2,
Nizhniy Tagil, Nizhnyaya Tura, Tomsk, and Plesetsk); 1 at a SAM site (Kostroma
B21-2); and 1 at a military barracks (Pidula Army Barracks). All storage areas
are near known PLRS complexes.
DISCUSSION
Although construction chronologies vary at each complex, some generaliza-
tions can be made which are applicable for most complexes. Construction of the
launch sites and the tracking/guidance facility is usually started first. The sup-
port area usually is constructed concurrently with the launch sites and the
tracking/guidance facility, but extensive construction at the missile-handling
area generally is not observed until other components at the complex are near-
ly complete. The air-warning radar facility may be constructed at virtually any
stage of complex construction. Where coverage permits, it has been observed
PROBABLE LONG RANGE SAM CONSTRUCTION STARTS
(including modification of Leningrad complexes)
* As of 1 Jul 67.
FIGURE 2. PLRS LAUNCH COMPLEX CONSTRUCTION STARTS, USSR.
-1-
NPIC ~-s ss
Approved For Release~~3/S~1~1~~~1 - 0730001002
25X1
5X1
 Approved For Releas~~3~~l~~~
Table 1. Co~aPdex Sb?tus, as of 1 Judy 1967
I `:
~
a
fi
;? . ~ . va .ofi fi
ti' J4 ti ro~ ~ ~ti w0
~ fi 6 JQ ~ ~ J U
?~~
a .y
. m
~,?
~ 3Q ' 0 G~ ~~
L ro U ~Q ro ~ 0
?
ro
.ofi ~0 0 ~ ~~' ~ ofi ~ ~~
a c; @ 0 0 0 ~~ fi 0
fi
fi
G
~
~
~
0
~ ~ ro ~C
tifi
fi~ ~ ~
o m O roi ro ro ~;
~
0
fi~
fi 0 ~
0
O
~ ~
tit
~
~
q
a ~
a ~ ~, ~; . o .~~ . o ~ ~~ ~
~
~
ti
0
fi
~ 0
.~
, O
~
.~~ a ?~~ .ofi ~' ~' ~ 4
~
'
fi
~
.,~
0 .,~h
.,~
~ @
~, 4 O
wG
,~Q~
.~
~4
. O
0 '~
CO 0 SO 64
0
. 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 @ ~, Ofi
'~ ,~,~ 0 ~ ~ Q' 0 ro sr 0 tit rot fi Q
~'
9' ~,
~
ro ? o
Q '~
0 '~
~' ti
~ ~?
~ ^p '
ro
0
G ~~, ti,~ 0 'tifi ti ~ fi ? fi
ro ~' p Q 0 fi ?,~ ~,~ qti m~
CC
a ,q q
~ +' c ~ '
~
~0
~
~
0
ti
~
ti
u v
a0 S ~0 m fi fi * * Q * 0 ~ ro . ro
S
t
0 S *
Q
~
,
,
ti
0~ 0 fi * ~ro Ofi ~ro ~ro a4
tG
0~ ,~
cp LO m~ ro~ 0a ~ ~~ ~ 0~ ~ ~ tro
fi
`'
JQ
M `~
~~ pfi q ~ '~L .~ C L 6
~
fi
G
40
~
N U ~S Q' 0 ~ L ~ ~ ti
Complex 0 0 a ~
~ '~ ti
~ V N ti
Q O
~ P O
~
Cherepovets
3a
Complete 5 30 5 x 4
4
25X1 D
Leningrad NW4
1
Complete 5 30 5
5
Tallinn
2
Complete 5 30 5 x 4
6
Leningrad NE4
1
Complete 5 30 5
7
Liepaja
3a
Complete 5 30 5 x 4
8
Murashi
3a
Mid-Late 5 18 0 x 0
9
Leningrad SW4
1
Complete 5 30 5
10
Nizhniy Tagil
3d
Mid 3 0 0
11
Sary-Shagan 1
3d
Complete 3 18 3 x 4
12
Sary-Shagan 2
3d9
Complete 2 12 2 x 4
13
Feodosiya
3b
Mid-Late 3 9~~ 3 x 0
14
Sverdlovsk
3d
Mid-Late 3 6 2 x 4
15
Nizhnyaya Tura
3b
Mid 3 0 0 x 4
16
Kalinin
4
Mid-Late 3 12 2
17
Kimry
3d
Mid 3 0 0 x 0
18
Pereslavl-Zalesskiy
4
Mid-Late 3 12 2 x 4
19
Babayevo
48
Mid 3 0 0
20
Volgograd
4
Mid 3 0 0 x 0
21
Mo~haysk
4
Mid 3 0 0 xlo 0
22
Tomsk
3c
Early-Mid 3 0 0
23
Kapustin Yar
49
Mid 2 0 0 x to 0
24
Plesetsk
4
Mid 3 0 0 x 0
25
Angarsk
4
Early-Mid 3 0 0 x 0
26
Krasnoyarsk
3d
Mid 3 0 0
27
Chelyabinsk
4
Early 3 0 0
28
Khabarovsk
4
Mid 3 0 0
29
Kostroma
4
Mid-Late 3 12 2 x 4
30
Kuressaare
4
Mid 3 0 0
31
Sharya
4
Early 3 0 0
32
Vladivostok
4
Early 2 0
33
Kiyev
4
Early 3 0 0 x 0
34
Rostov
4
Early 3 0 0
35
Bereaniki
4
Early 3 0 0 x11 0
36
Neya
4
Early p
37
Barshchev
4
Early 1 0
38
Minsk
4
Early 0
39
Ventspils
4
Early 3 0 0
40
Kaliningrad
4
Early 3 0 0
41
Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk
4
Early 1 0
42
Tikhvin
4
Early 1 0
43
Tyuratam
4
Early 1 0 0
44
*Tracking/Guidance
~*Air Warning
1. Early--survey lines, tree clearance, missile-handling and launch site service roads.
Mid--rails, revetments, radar mounds, support buildings.
Late--missile-associated equipment at complex; construction appears complete.
Complete--radars, launchers, and dollies in operational positions.
2. Refers to year construction was first observed on photography at each complex.
3. Date refers to any construction observed before the complex could be identified.
4. Date refers to modifications of complex to accommodate Tallinn system.
5. Date refers to initial construction of the drive-through missile assembly/checkout building annotated on Figures 5, 7, and
handling facility along with buildings in the support area which existed before construction of the drive-through building.
6. An active SA-2 SAM support facility 2.5 nm SE of the complex is probably used as the missile-handling area.
7. Modification of existing SAM support facility near the complex to possibly accommodate Tallinn system.
8. Gemplex consists of 2 circumferential-road launch sites and 1 loop-road launch site.
9. Complex consists of only 2 sites, but fits into this category because of general design.
10. Probable.
11. Suspect.
TOP SECRET
10. This building probably serves as part of the missile-
25X1
25X1
Approved For Release 2003112119 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
 25X1 gpproved For Release 2003/12/19 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
 roved For Relea~~OS~/~F~~ - 9A0073000100~
equipped before the other 2.
Construction time varies from 3 months to over 2 years. Launch Complexes
1 and 2 at Sary-Shagan ATC were constructed and equipped within 3 months,
while Liepaja has taken over 2 years to reach the same status. Eighteen to 30
months appears to be an average construction period.
that launch sites A and C at three-site complexes usually are completed and
equipped before site B; 3 sites at a five-site complex usually are completed and
The number of construction starts of launch complexes identified from ~ 25X1
s shown in Figure 2. Because of the lack of photo cover-
age, some complexes may have been started the preceding year, rather than the
year listed.
No five-site complexes were begun after The Ural complexes 25X1
were started between mid- and late and surveyed in anticipation of 5 sites,
but only 3 sites appeared.
PLRS Launch Complexes 1 and 2 at Sary-Shagan were constructed about the
time of an apparent transition from five- to three-site-complexes. Launch Com-
plex 1 was the first complex specifically designed as a three-site complex. Three
sites were planned at PLRS Launch Complex 2, but only 2 sites were constructed.
For convenience in this report, the various categories of complexes and an
example of each type are listed below.
Category 1: Leningrad
Category 2: Tallinn
Category 3a: Murashi
Category 3b: Feodosiya
Category 3c: Tomsk '
Category 3d: Kimry
Category 4: Kalinin
Figure 3 contains a sketch of each category.
Excluding the Tallinn and Leningrad complexes as unique cases, 2 other
launch complex designs remain. The first design (categories 3a through 3d)
utilizes aloop-road pattern at the launch sites; the second design (category 4)
has acircumferential-road pattern at the launch sites. Murashi, Cherepovets,
and Liepaja, the 3 remaining five-site complexes (excluding Tallinn and Lenin-
grad), utilize the loop-road pattern.
Evolving from the five-site complexes were 3 categories of three-site com-
plexes with loop roads. The first category uses sites designated . A, B, and C;
the second category sites B, C, and D; and the third category sites C, D, and E.
At the three-site complexes, the missile-handling area has not been relocated
but remains in nearly the same relative position as if 5 sites had been construct-
ed At three- and five-site complexes the complex access road and support area
are usually located behind site A.
Only 1 category of launch complex uses the circumferential-road pattern.
The launch sites at these complexes are arranged in an arc, about equal distance
from the tracking/guidance facility, and are not staggered as at complexes with
loop-road patterns. The missile-handling area is located opposite Launch Site B.
The complex access road and support area are usually in the vicinity of Lrunch
Site A.
Although Babayevo is designed for the circumferential-road pattern, 1 site
has aloop-road pattern. Though unusual, this complex will not be considered
as a separate category.
Twelve complexes have aloop-road pattern, 24 complexes use the circum-
ferential-road pattern, and Babayevo has a combination of both patterns. Twelve
of the 15 complexes started in ~ncluding Babayevo, and all of the com-
plexes started in ~ use the circumferential-road pattern indicating that this
will probably be the exclusive design in the future.
Six different revetment designs have been identified. They vary in protec-
tion of the launch position from the nearly totally enclosed revetments at
Tallinn to complete absence of revetments at launch positions 3 and 4 at loop-
Approved For Rele~S~ 2~~~ :CIA-RDP78T04759 00730001
i
 roved For Relea~~Og~/`F~~~
CIA-RDP78T04 59A0073000100~
road pattern launch sites. Each launch position is revetted to some degree at
launch sites with acircumferential-road pattern. At launch sites with aloop-
road pattern, all launch positions are revetted except positions 3 and 4. No re-
vetments have appeared at Murashi or the Ural complexes (Nizhniy Tagil,
Nizhnyaya Tura, and Sverdlovsk), although they have been under construction
for about 2 years.
Control center revetments are U-shaped at launch sites with aloop-road
pattern and are drive through at sites with acircumferential-road pattern. The
exception appears to be at Babayevo where the loop-road site has adrive-
through control center revetment.
Two probable, 1 suspect, and 16 confirmed air-warning radar facilities have
been identified between 2.5 and 5.0 nm from each of 19 launch complexes. A
typical facility consists of 4 mounded radar positions upon which 2 BACK NET
and 2 SIDE NET radars have been seen. A central revetment, a probable control
building, and 2 nearby, associated, unidentified areas are also present at a typi-
cal air-warning radar facility.
Each of 6air-warning radar facilities has 2 associated unidentified areas.
The 2 unidentified areas are located about 3,000 to 5,000 feet from the air-warn-
ing radar facility. Each of the 2 areas contains 1 to 3 probable bunkers/mounded
structures with a small apron or road in front of each. Figure 45 is a photo-
graph of a typical PLRS air-warning radar facility with the associated unidenti-
fied areas.
1
1
Approved For Rele~~t 29~7P~1T9
251
25X1
25X1
 Approved For Release 2003112119 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
Next 5 Page(s) In Document Exempt
Approved For Release 2003112119 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
 25X1
25X1 D
App~oved For Releas~
Approved For Releas~460~~T IA-RDP78T04759
25
25
 25X1 D gpproved For Release 2003/12/19 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
Next 2 Page(s) In Document Exempt
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
 Apps
oved For Releafi?PO(~~-Cl(~
FIGURE 14. FEODOSIYA PLRS LAUNCH COMPLEX. (Inset: air-warning radar facility 3.5 nm NWT.
Approved For Rele21~2(~3Y~~1 :CIA-RD~7aT047
25~
25
 25X1 D gpproved For Release 2003/12/19 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
 25X1 I Approved For Relear~?PO~~~~l~~
25X1
FIGURE 16. NIZHNYAYA TURA PL RS LAUNCH COMPLEX. (Inset: air-warning radar facility 3.5 nm NE1.
Approved For Rele~Z~2bf~~ :CIA-RDP78T0~759A007300010b27-8
25~
25
 25X1 D gpproved For Release 2003/12/19 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
Next 2 Page(s) In Document Exempt
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
 pp
oved For Relea~o~0~~/~~~:
- 9A0073000100~
Approved For Rele2s~.{1~7~~
25~
25
 25X1 D gpproved For Release 2003/12/19 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
Next 1 Page(s) In Document Exempt
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
 r ri r~ r ar r~ r r~ ri ar r r~ ,r r r ~r ~r rr r~ rr r~ r r r
Approved For Release 2003112119 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
25X1
0
rn
5X~'
rn
5X1
FIGURE23. iOMSK PLRS LAUNCH COMPLEX.
25X1 D
0
m
5X1
m
25X1
Approved For Release 2003112119 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
 5X1
25X1 D
App
roved For Relea0~~~~~r
FIGURE 24. KAPUSTIN YAR PL RS LAUNCH COMPLEX. ~Inseh air-warning radar facility 3.5 nm NW~.
-26-
Approved For Relea~~0~~1~~
25~
25
 1
t
25X1 D
~rpved For Releas~'~A3~~T~. IA-RDP78T04759A0 730001002
Approved For Releas~Q~O~~~~T IA-RDP78T0475 A0073000100
25X1
125X1
25X1
25X1
 Approved For Release 2003/12/19 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
 t
1
1
25X1 D
Approved For Relea~P10~~~1~~1~ CIA-RDP78T04
roved For Relea~~0(~~~~
CIA-RDP78T04 59A00730001002~8
25X1
25X1
 roved For Relea~Og~:
A00730001002~
Approved For Relea~?~0~1'~~~:ICIA-RDP78T04~59A007300010
i
i
25~
25
 25X1 D
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
 Approved For Release 2003112119 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
25X1
0
-v
rn
5X1
rn
5~IX1 D
FIGURE 30. KOSiROMA PLRS LAUNCH COMPiEX, Inset: air?warning radar faility 4.0 nm S~.
25X1
Approved For Release 2003112119 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
it ri rr r~ Mr it rr rr rr ~r rr r~ r ~r rr r~ ~r r~ r~ r Mr r~ rr rr
 Approved For Release 2003/12/19 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
Next 1 Page(s) In Document Exempt
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
 ved For Releas~0~ip~~i~T IA-RDP78T04759 00730001002
t
25X1 D
Approved For Relea~?~0~~~~:
25X1
25X1
 roved For Relea'~?~0~~~:
A00730001002~
FIGURE 34. KIYEV PL RS LAUNCH COMPLEX. (Inset: air-warning radar facility 2.5 nm EN~.
Approved For Relea~~0~~~~
25X~
25X
 25X1 D gpproved For Release 2003/12/19 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
 oved For Releas~0~3~1~~1~9T
FIGURE 36. BEREZNIKI PL RS LAUNCH COMPLEX. (Inseh air-warning radar facility 3.5 nm SE~.
Approved For Relea~~~'~'(~'[~T: IA-RDP78T047 9A007300010
t
1
t
t
25~
25
 App~^~~Q For Release 2003/12/19 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
 5X1
25X1 D
oved For Release~Q0~3~1~,~,1 - 0730001002
Approved For Relea~?B0~'~E~~
25
25
 Apq'
1
t
25X1 D
roved For Relea~?~0~~~:
Approved For Relea51~P09~/'4~9 CIA-RDP78T047
E
25X1
25X1
25X1
 Appr~
ved For Relea0~~~~1~
007300010027
25X,
i
Approved For Releal~~20~~~1~;
25~
25
 Appr~
ved For Relea~~05iE'9~: -
-43-
25X1 D
Approved For Relea~~0~~1~1~
25X1
25X1
25X1
 Approved For Release 2003/12/19 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
 25X1 D
Apps
oved For Releas~~PO~/~~~T
Approved For Releas~QBO~~~T
25X1
25X1
25X1
 Approved For Release 2003/12/19 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Approved For Release 2003112119 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
0
m
5X'~v'
rn
5X1
25X1
O
rn
5X1
rn
25X1
25X1 D Approved For Release 2003112119 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
 25X1 D gpproved For Release 2003/12/19 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 :CIA-RDP78T04759A007300010027-8
 pp
oved For Relea~0~~~:
0073000100 7-8
25X1 D
1. NPIC. Summary of Probable Long Range SAM Launch Complexes, USSR, Jun 67 (TOP SECRET
REQUIREMENT
CIA. C-DI7-84,255
NPIC PROJECT
11248/67 (partial answer)
Approved For Relea~~~0(~f'F211.9' I CIA-RDP78T04759IA007300
25X1
25X1