EVALUATIONS OF SOVIET SURFACE-TO-SURFACE MISSILE DEPLOYMENT 29TH REVISION

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: NGA Records (Formerly NIMA)
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP78T04757A000300010027-7
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: T
• Document Page Count: 54
• Document Creation Date: December 28, 2016
• Document Release Date: September 17, 2003
• Sequence Number: 27
• Publication Date: January 1, 1969
• Content Type: REPORT

V,
Copy 111
54 Pages
or Fterease f0b3/12/i s F: CIA-RDP78T04757A0003 11 U1 U'll U1 -
January 1969
EVALUATIONS OF SOVIET
SURFACE-TO-SURFACE
MISSILE -.DE LOYMENT
29TH R E TSI N
A Report of the Deployment Working Group
of the
Guided Missile and Astronautics Intelligence Committee
DECLASS REVIEW by NIMA/DOD
GROUP 1
Eaclud.d Iron ~neHc
dewnpedi.$ and d. 1. ?M~Ra11aw
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A0003000100 717
 ApPFGyed or ReI
SECRET
TOP
EVALUATIONS OF SOVIET
SURFACE-TO-SU RFACE
MISSILE DEPLOYMENT
29TH REVISION
A Report of the Deployment Working Group
of the
Guided Missile and Astronautics Intelligence Committee
January 1969
25X1
25X1
Approved For Rele 59901 ~ : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010027-7
 5X1
ved For Release 20
TOP SECRET
The Guided Missile and Astronautics Intelligence Com-
mittee (GMAIC) wishes to express its appreciation to the
National Photographic Interpretation Center for its as-
sistance in the editing, illustrating, and publishing of
this report.
Approved FoT6pls E?R
 d For T~Ipa RET
Photographic interpreter support is provided by the Imagery
Exploitation Group, NPIC.
25
25
Approved For 1f -*1P
 Appruve
For Ff6Vs?ECRH
Addendum for 29th Revision
29th revision.
issue.
sites and groups and the new totals are as follows:
New Sites
Total
Sites New Groups To
tal Gro
ups
SS-9
3
2
27 0
38
SS-11
27
6
71 3
71
SS-13
9
31 *
0
SS-9 168
SS-1I 570 - 590
SS-13 0 - 10
Six new silos in very early stages of construction were identified
at the Tyuratam Missile Test Range. The excavations and the orien-
tations of these new silos, which have been designated the P group,
appear similar to Type IIIC sites. They are, however, too early in the
construction stages to permit positive identification of the type silo or
any meaningful missile system association.
Additional control buildings like those referred to as "second
control buildings" at Uzhur and Drovyanaya have been identified at
all SS-9 complexes and four SS-11 complexes. The orientations of
antennas associated with these new control buildings suggests that
the facilities may be alternate command and control centers for the
complex. The antennas are oriented in the same direction as those
associated with the original complex hardened command and control
facilities.
*We believe the SS-13 will be deployed in groups of 10. Three launch control facilities (LCF)
have been identified and a fourth may be under construction. No firm association of launch-
ers with the isolated LCFs can be made.
25
25
25
cutoff date and the year-end publication of the
The changes will be discussed more fully in the next
Approved For FtsSK0p12r19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010027-7
 Appr~ed,For R6F agt I j
PREFACE
This report is published periodically by the GMAIC Deployment
Working Group (DWG) to provide a current evaluation of all Soviet
ICBM, IRBM, and MRBM deployment, including numbers, types of
site configurations, estimated construction and operational status,
and other evaluations by the DWG. These data constitute the majority
view of the DWG membership, and may not correspond precisely to
individual assessments by each member. Detailed tables with indi-
vidual site data are included in this publication. In accordance with
the wishes of a majority of recipients, future revisions will be pub-
lished as new information warrants.
Dissemination of the report was previously limited to holders
of the DWG report, Soviet Surface-to-Surface Missile Deployment.
Because the information contained herein is both supplemental and
self-sustaining, distribution will no longer be limited to holders of
the above report.
25
25
Approved For ffo f a T1
 Apff8yed or Release 2003/12
TOP SECRET
CONTENTS
Page
Introduction ...................................... ....... 1
Soviet Missile Deployment .................................... 1
Current ICBM Deployment ................................. 1
Type IIIC Sites ........................................ 4
Type IIID Sites ........................................ 6
Type IIIE Sites ........................................ 11
Current MRBM/IRBM Deployment ........................... 11
Camouflage and Deception ................................ 17
Mobile Missile Facilities (SCALEBOARD) ...................... 17
Activities at Test Facilities .................................. 18
Tyuratam Missile Test Center .............................. 18
Plesetsk Missile and Space Center ........................... 24
Kapustin Yar Missile Test Center .......... ................. 27
Table 1. Summary of Estimated Status of Identified ICBM, IRBM, and MRBM
Launch Positions at Deployed Complexes, I........ 29
Table 2. Summary Evaluation of Soviet ICBM ep oyment .............. 30
Table 3. Summary Evaluation of R&D and Training Launch Facilities, Tyuratam
and Plesetsk Missile Test Centers ........................... 35
Table 4. Summary Evaluation. of Soviet IRBM Deployment .............. 37
Table 5. Summary Evaluation of Soviet MRBM Deployment ............. 38
Table 6. Fan-Shaped Pads and Inactive MRBM Launch Sites ............ 43
Table 7. Summary Evaluation of Selected Launch Facilities, Kapustin Yar Mis-
sile Test Center ........................................ 44
Table 8. Soviet ICBM Systems, Estimated Technical Characteristics and Per-
formance ............................................. 45
Table 9. Soviet IRBM and MRBM Systems, Estimated Technical Characteris-
tics and Performance .. ...... ............ . . . . .... . . . . . . . .. 46
Approved For FT s1~ Elul
OUR
25
25
25
 d For T60a Qf
ILLUSTRATIONS
Page
Figure 1. Deployment of Soviet ICBM Complexes .............. Facing 1
Figure 2. Typical Configurations of ICBM Launch Sites, and
Explanation of Types ................................ 2
Figure 3. Profiles of Soviet Single-Silo ICBM Silos .................. 3
Figure 4. Alternate Command and Control, Site 34F Uzhur ICBM
Complex ........................................ 5
Figure S. Alternate Command and Control, Drovyanaya ICBM Complex ..... 6
Figure 6. Probable SS-11 Training Site, Borovsk ICBM Complex ......... 9
Figure 7. Yoshkar-Ola ICBM Launch Control Facility 22B ............. 10
Figure 8. Deployment of Soviet IRBM/MRBM Complexes .............. 12
Figure 9. Typical Configurations of IRBM/MRBM Launch Sites, with
Associated Missile Systems ........................... 13
Figure 10. Fan-Shaped Pads, Balki MRBM Launch Site ................ 14
Figure 11. Fan-Shaped Pads, Gvardeysk MRBM Launch Site 1 ........... 15
Figure 12. Kurgancha Fixed Field MRBM Site 2 .................... 16
Figure 13. Tyuratam Missile Test Center ......................... 19
Figure 14. Missile at G2A Ready Building, TTMTC ................... 20
Figure 15. Tyuratam Launch Site 02 ............................ 20
Figure 16. Fuel Transfer Operation, Launch Site L9, TTMTC, 21
Figure 17. Oxidizer Transfer Operation, Launch Site L9, TTMTC,
0
Figure 18. Plesetsk Missile and Space Center ......................
Figure 19. Plesetsk SS-13 Ground Support Equipment Facility........... .
Figure 20. Plesetsk Launch Site 21 ..............................
Figure 21. Kapustin Yar Missile Test Center .......................
22
23
24
26
28
25
25
25
25
Approved For FTQaT1
 Approved For Release 2003/12
TOP SECRET
7
B
P~,-
Y
a ( M
n T .,
U d
N
o- ?~ x. N~O O
N N
4) CD
~-= 00 C C
c) Q)
1
Q
O
O O O
~pp O
? \p~ L
d H
o
Approved For RRsSRORf
E
O
w O
N ~ C
'E
Z
25
25
25
 or IW'INE
INTRODUCTION
This report is the 29th Revision of Eval-
uations of Soviet Surface -to -Surface Missile
Deployment, prepared by the Deployment Work-
ing Group (DWG) of the Guided Missile and
Astronautics Intelligence Committee (GMAIC).
The information contained in this and previous
revisions is self-sustaining and supplements
the basic DWG report Soviet Surface-to-Surface
Missile Deployment, which provides detailed
information on launch facilities of the Soviet
Strategic Rocket Forces. The basic report,
dat~January 1962 (Control Number
for the SS-9 and SS-11 systems has continued
into the third quarter of 1968 and while some
additional construction probably will take place,
we believe that both systems may be approach-
ing planned levels.
Additional developments include: 1) con-
tinued, though limited, deployment of the Type
IIIE silos at the Yoshkar-Ola Complex; 2) the
discovery of an isolated SS-11 silo at an instal-
lation of unknown purpose at Borovsk; 3) some
continuation of ineffective attempts to camou-
flage missile sites; 4) further indications that at
least some MRBM sites are being modified;
and 5) some new developments associated with
the Scaleboard mobile missile system.
has been revised and updated on a peri-
odic basis. Further updating is accomplished in
reports prepared and published for GMAIC by
the National Photographic Interpretation Center
(NPIC).
This 29th Revision summarizes and updates
I fissions during t is period, con-
tinuing analysis of previous missions, and other
sources have provided additional information on
the Soviet strategic missile deployment pro-
gram. A summary of the estimated status of
identified ICBM, IRBM, and MRBM launchers
at deployed complexes is given in Table 1.
Cutoff date for information in this report is
SOVIET MISSILE DEPLOYMENT
Significant developments in the Soviet ICB M
deployment program since publication of the
28th Revision include the identification of addi-
tional single silos under construction at de-
ployed complexes and continuing construction
activity probably related to development at the
Tyuratam Missile Test Center (TTMTC), the
Plesetsk Missile and Space Center (PMSC),
and at the Kapustin Yar Missile Test Center
(KYMTC). Although construction of new sites
CURRENT ICBM DEPLOYMENT
No new ICBM completes have been dis-
covered since the 28th Revision; the number
remains 25. See Figure 1 for location of de-
ployed ICBM complexes. These complexes
now contain a total of 1110 confirmed and
probable launchers, of which 142 are soft
and 968 are hard. Included in the hard launcher
count are 890 single silos.
Of the 1110 confirmed and probable launch-
ers, 896 are estimated to have been operational
as of In addition to the
launchers cited above, the Soviets have some
96 launchers which we believe are primarily
for research and development and training.
These launchers, which probably could be used
in an operational role under certain circum-
stances, are deployed as follows: 1) 23 at
Plesetsk, where 9 are complete and 14 are un-
der construction; 2) 58 at Tyuratam, where 34
are complete, 12 are under construction, and
12 probably are space associated; 3) 15 at
rail-to-road transfer points of SS-9 and SS-11
complexes where there is one site that is not
associated with any group (at each of the six
SS-9 complexes and at nine of the ten SS-11
25
25
25
Approved For OFa&CR5T1
 25X1 Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010027-7
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010027-7
 xi
d For fdVa eoQ, 2/19 : CIA-RDP78T04757A000300010027-7
RET
xi
nEc
xi
t I--o--I
r
PREFABRICA i ED
SECTION
MD
CONCRETE FILLS !
ALL DIMENSIONS
ARE IN FEET
Approved For %jba5f 6RF1
ME
 Approved For Releas
e
20
03/12)
S
t
U
complexes). The ICBM sites have been desig-
nated by type, as shown and explained in
Figures 2 and 3.
TYPE IIIC
Deployment of Type IIIC silos has continued
at the six complexes - -Aleysk, Dombarovskiy,
Imeni Gastello, Kartaly, Uzhur, and Zhangiz-
Tobe--that were identified in 1964. The start
of a new group at each of the six complexes,
since indicates that the deploy-
ment program has remained active. The rate
of group starts for the first half of 1968 is
about the program average. See the following
table for a list of estimated starts by quarter
for each year.
Estimated Starts by Quarter of Identified Type IIIC Groups
and Sites for Each Year.
1
2
1964 Groups 5
1
0
3 9
Sites 12
15
6
6 39
1965 Groups 2
2
1
3 8
Sites 9
24
4
9 46
1966 Groups 2
2
3
4 11
Sites 27
9
18
22 76
1968 Groups 2
4
0
Sites 16
14
6
Total Groups
38
Sites
224
Currently, we have observed 224 of the 228
IIIC sites needed to fill out the 38 identified
groups. We estimate that 156 IIICs are now
operational and that all 228 will be completed
by mid-1970. We believe that the IIIC program
may be approaching its planned goal, but as yet
we cannot determine the precise number of
launchers that ultimately will be deployed. The
fact that two complexes now have eight groups,
while three have six and one has four, suggests
that the Soviets do not plan to have the same num -
ber of launch groups at each complex. The fol-
lowing table reflects the numbers of identified
Type IIIC sites and groups by complex.
Aleysk
24 4
Dombarovskiv
48 8
Imeni Gastello
35 6
Kartaly
33 6
Uzhur
48 8
Zhangiz-Tobe
36 6
*In addition there is one site at the rail-to-road transfer point
of each of the six complexes, which we believe to be prima-
rily for trainirg, but which could have an operational capabil-
ity under certain conditions.
The following is a summary of significant
findings at each IIIC complex since the previous
update of this publication in
Aleysk
The latest group was detected in
The pace of construction
of this group, which was started during the
first quarter of 1968, appears to be somewhat
faster than normal for IIIC sites. Three of
the four groups at this complex are now com-
plete. The activity level noted at the main
support base, including the stockpiling of mate-
rials, indicates that some additional deployment
25
25X
25X
25X
25X
25X
Approved For I PT
 ForTOPPaSECRET
Kartaly
The latest group, which probably was started
Dombarovskiy
The latest group probably was started in
Five of the eight groups are now
complete and the sixth probably is complete.
The seventh group probably will be completed
in early 1969, and the eighth group in late 1969.
Imeni Gastello
The latest group at this complex was
detected in
construction probably began in
Four of the six groups are complete. The
fifth group will be completed by the fourth
quarter of 1968 and the sixth group by the end
of the fourth quarter 1969.
25
25
25
25
25
25
Approved Forae(eVIT/1
Only three sites have been
detected in this group.) Four of the six
groups are complete, and the fifth group prob-
ably will reach completion by the end of the
fourth quarter 1968. The sixth group proba-
bly will be completed during the fourth quarter
of 1969. Levels of activity within the main sup-
port area, including the large stockpile of ma-
terials, suggest additional deployment may be
planned for this complex.
Uzhur
Construction of the latest group, which
was found in
probably began in
are complete and the sixth probably has just
been completed. The seventh group should
25
 TOP SECRET
reach completion in while
the eighth group probably will be completed
by the end of the third quarter 1969. In
Estimated Operational IIIC Groups
The following table identifies the groups
at each complex that
operational as of
Complex Gro
up Designator Number of Groups
Aleysk A
Dombarovskiy A
,B,C
,B,C,D,E,F
6
Imeni Gastello A
,B,C,D
4
Kartaly A
,B,C,D
4
Uzhur A
,B,C,D,E
5
Zhangiz-Tobe A
,B,C,D
4
26
Zhangiz-Tobe
The latest group was identified in
ndprobably was started in
Three groups are complete, a fourth
probably is complete, and the fifth group should
be completed during the second quarter of 1969.
The sixth group probably will be completed during
the fourth quarter of 1969.
TYPE IIID
Deployment of Type IIID silos has been
continued into the third quarter of 1968, but
the rate of starts this year has been reduced
significantly. See the following table for a
list of estimated starts by quarter for each
year.
25
25
25X
25X
25X
Approved For R*ps5FeffT2
25X
 Appruve
Estimated Starts by Quarter of Identified Type IIID Groups
and Sites for Each Year
For DM- SeEfttyI
1964
Groups 1
5
3
2
Sites 3
40
17
25
1965
Groups 1
5
1
5 1
2
Sites 18
38
19
28 10
3
1966
Groups 14
8
2
0 2
4
Sites 102
88
45
24 25
9
1967
Groups 9
4
2
1 16
Sites 52
35
25
24 136
Total
Groups
68
Sites
644
I a total of 79 new IIID single silos were
detected under construction; most are in eight
newly identified groups. We have now identi-
fied 644 IIID silos under construction or oper-
ational in 68 groups. The following table shows
identified Type IIID groups and sites, by com-
plex.
Identified Type IIID Groups and Sites by Complex
Complex
No of Sites
No of Groups
Drovyanaya
50
5
Gladkaya
60
6
Kostroma
45
5
Kozelsk
73
8
Olovyannaya
90
9
Perm
56
6
Svobodnyy
60
6
Tatishchevo
120
12
Teykovo
28
4
Yedrovo
62
7
644*
68
*In addition there is one site at each of nine SS-11 com-
plex rail-to-road transfer points and one expected at the
tenth complex -- Teykovo -- which we believe to have a
primary training role, but which could have an opera-
tional capability under certain conditions.
We estimate that 52 groups (520 launchers) Five Sites in the last group--the L group
that all 68 identified groups (680 launchers)
will be operational by mid-1970. We believe
that the IIID program has nearly reached its
planned level; however, a few additional groups
may appear.
Drovyanaya
The only significant activity at Drovyanaya
was the start of a probable second hardened
command and control facility on the south-
eastern edge of the complex (Figure 5). The
principal features are an underground control
bunker and four above-ground antenna fields.
It is not certain why a second facility has
been started, but it does appear identical to
the second control facility at Uzhur Site 34.
All five groups at Drovyanaya have been ob-
served complete.
Gladkaya
No significant new activity was noted at
this complex during the period; all six groups
are complete.
Olovyannaya
The L group was observed complete; the
first sites were seen complete in and
the remainder later in the period.
the transfer point site was observed complete.
All nine groups at this complex are now com-
plete.
Perm
Eleven new sites were discovered, includ-
ing six in the new L group. The first site in
this group was in the mid-stage of construction
when firs the group probably
started in During Ithe trans-
fer point site was observed comp ete. Four of
the six groups at this complex are complete.
25
25
25
Tatishchevo
--were observed complete in
II
Approved ForTIaSECRMV1
25
 Appruve
For I VTf So 9 I
ing a similar status for the other sites in
the group, all 12 groups at the complex are
now complete.
Kostroma
A total of 14 new site starts were dis-
covered at Kostroma. One site was in the
K group; eight sites were in the L group,
and four sites were in a new M group. This
latest group, the fifth to be started at this
complex, probably began in
the transfer point site was confirmed.
is now in mid-stage but was first seen in
an early stage of construction in
Sites in two groups at Kostroma were
observed complete. All sites in the I group
were seen finished, the earliest in
Additionally, four sites in the J group, in-
cluding the control site, were seen complete
Kozelsk
Twelve new sites were found in four groups
at Kozelsk during the past six months, in-
cluding three in a new N group. All three
sites in this new group were discovered in
the group probably started in = The
remainder of the newly discovered sites were
in the K group (two sites), the L group (three
sites), and the M group (four sites).
Five of the eight groups at Kozelsk prob-
ably are complete. All ten sites in the J
group were observed complete in 0 and
one site in the L group was finished in
The L group, although it began shortly after
the K group, apparently was completed ear-
lier.
Svobodnyy
While no new starts were detected at
Svobodnyy during the period, the complex has
not been totally negated in More -
over, in " several survey towers were
observed southeast of the N group. Because
these towers have been reliable indicators
of new site construction on other occasions,
it is expected that a new group has been, or
shortly will be, started in this location.
All sites in the M and N groups and the
transfer point site were observed complete
in All identified sites at this
complex are now complete.
Yedrovo
Activity continues at a high level, with
the detection of 21 new sites and two new
groups bringing the total groups at this com-
plex to seven. Ten sites in a new N group
were found, all ten probably starting in
Only two sites in the new 0
group have been detected, with both starting
In addition, eight sites in the M
group and one site in the K group were picked
up. The M group sites started in
and bile the K group site
dates back to
Site completions were observed in the
I, J, K, and L groups at Yedrovo. Five more
I group sites were seen finished. All ten
sites in both the J and L groups were ob-
served complete; the first completions in both
groups were seen in Three K group
sites were seen finished, the first in
Teykovo
This complex also continued active, with
21 sites and three group discoveries being made
during the period. The new groups are the
B group, with ten starts, the C group, with
six sites discovered so far, and the D group,
with two sites identified. The B group prob-
pear to have started in " probably the
group dates from this month as well. Three
25
25
25
25X
25X
25X
25X
25X
25X
25X
25X
25X
25X
25X
25X
Approved For Rf@ps5EejT2
 rF Top se ICCl
more A group discoveries complete the total;
two date back to 1967 but one was not started
six sites were observed finished
in the A group, indicating that the group as
a whole is very nearly complete. This will
be the first group to be completed at Teykovo.
Although construction of the propellant handling
facility at the rail-to-road transfer point was
continuing in 0 it presumably will be
complete in time to service missiles installed
in the A group silos.
Slowdown in Start Rate
In our 28th Revision, we noted that there
had been a slowdown in the overall rate of
Type IIID construction starts in early C
as compared with the same quarter in pre-
Approved For FT a~~1
vious years. It appears that this slowdown
has continued and that the average start rate
has reverted to that observed during the first
seven quarters of construction (see Table 4).
This return to the earlier rate reflects the
possible termination of site construction at
several of the complexes.
Borovsk SS-11 Silo
An isolated SS-11 silo, not associated with
an operational complex, was discovered in
near Borovsk, about 45 nautical miles south-
west of Moscow. The installation with which
it is located may have a function similar to
that of the facility with an SS-9 silo at the
Kharkov Aviation Institute. The Borovsk silo
is similar to the transfer point silos at SS-11
complexes in having an above-ground control
 Approved
For Release 2003/1
TOP SECRET
building and a walk-in entrance. Its con-
struction pace also compares with typical trans -
fer point silos, starting in early 1965 and reach-
ing completion in
canister was seen in the open silo when photo-
graphed i=Figure 6).
The Borovsk silo is located at a large
installation of unknown purpose. The instal-
lation has a large, tall building and several
drive-through maintenance-type buildings. There
is an SRF higher command engineering school
at Serpukhov, some 50 nautical miles from
Borovsk, and it is possible that both the
Borovsk installation and silo are associated
with this school in some way. The tall build-
ing appears suitable for vertical testing of
missiles; possibly some form of applied re-
search/training on the SS-11 is conducted at
the facility.
Estimated Operational IIID Groups
The following table identifies the groups
each complex that are estimated to be
Complex
Drovyanaya
Gladkaya
Kostroma
Kozelsk
Olovyannaya
Perm
Svobodnyy
Tatishchevo
Teykovo
Group Designator
G,H,I,J,K
F,G,H,I,J,K
I,J
G,H,I,J
D,E,F,G,H,I,J,K,L
G,H,I,J
I,J,K,L,M,N
A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I,J,K,L
Yedrovo I,J,K,L
Total Operational Groups
25
25
25
25X
25X
25X
Approved For R l scj iPJ19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010027-7
 ApprUV
~d For T6Fa nffef`
The 22 new, hard, single-silo launch sites
identified at the Yoshkar-Ola ICBM Complex
during the second half of 1967 and the first
half of this year have been designated Type
IIIE. The launchers and three launch control
centers are under construction. Construction
techniques for the IIIE silos appear similar
to those at US Minuteman launch sites (See
Figure 3). Although the final launcher con-
figuration is not certain, it probably will be
similar if not identical to that of the single
silos in the east portion of the Plesetsk Mis-
sile and 'Space Center. The observed pace
of construction indicates these sites probably
will be completed by mid-1969. The SS-13
(KY-6) solid propellant missile, which is being
tested to ICBM ranges from Plesetsk, probably
will be deployed in the IIIE sites.
The number of launchers in a IIIE group
has not been established. However, at least
three launch groups are indicated by the fact
that three dispersed launch control facilities
have been identified. None of the launch con-
trol facilities is nearer than 1.5 nm to a launch
silo. The following table shows the estimated
IIIE silo construction starts by quarter.
Estimated Starts by Quarter of Identified Type IIIE Sites
for Each Year
1967 -
1968 5
0
3rd 4th Total
7 8 15
7
22
Type IIIE Deployment Trends
The limited deployment of the IIIE sites
identified to date provides little indication of the
extent of future deployment. In the past, the
Soviets have deployed new systems at more
than one complex within a relatively short
time span. The fact that the IIIE silos have been
identified at only one complex more than a
year after deployment began suggests that
deployment of the system may be limited.
On the other hand, the presence of t'en Type
IIIE silos at Plesetsk suggests a largerprogram
which could appear at some or all of the
seven ICBM complexes which do not have
single silos. Perhaps additional fixed de-
ployment will be deferred until the missile
has been tested fully or the missile may be
deployed in a mobile mode.
CURRENT MRBM/IRBM DEPLOYMENT
Several new developments have been ob-
served in MRBM/IRBM deployment since pub-
lication of the 28th Revision. These include
the appearance, at Balki, of fan-shaped pads
similar to those seen at Gvardeysk, two new
fixed-field sites at Kurgancha, and continuing
activity at the Scaleboard sites along the Sino-
Soviet border.
In addition, continuing construction and
modification of sites at the Kapustin Yar Mis-
sile Test Range indicate that one or more
new systems probably will be tested in the
near future.
25
25
25
Approved For'MRaSEC~112/19:CIA-RDP78T04757A000300010027-7
 Approve For Release 2003/14
TOP SECRET
CHEVO
?? _..
BELO
I KA
?
M EROPOL
V 0'
U BIN 5K
K
HA SARy OZE0
EUROPEAN U. S. S. R.
? MRBM SOFT SITE A MRBM HARD SITE BLACK
? IRBM SOFT SITE A IRBM HARD SITE SEA
? SOFT LAUNCH SITE X AEANDONED OR
UNIDENTIFIED SYSTEM GUMMY SITE
^.MRBM LAUNCH FACILITY
Don A
O
A MAYKOP
GROZNYY A GEL Ll
4.
AREA O
INSET A
B AO R E NB U RG$$I KOY////~//
1 ?ANOVObYS?YEVKA
\O
130? ^1315? 00
MNA5TA5YEVKA
Approved For RTOfs SE J2,
25
25X
25X
 25X1 Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010027-7
Next 1 Page(s) In Document Exempt
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010027-7
 6X1
X1
X1
X1
Approved
r Release 2003/1
TOP SECRET
The locations of MRBM/IRBM deployment
are shown in Figure 8. Typical configurations
of the launch sites and the weapon system asso-
ciated with each are depicted in Figure 9.
Fan-Shaped Pads
Fan-shaped pads which are similar to
those at Gvardeysk were first seen at the
Balki site in the Simferopol Complex on Mis-
at Gvardeysk. Near each pad at both places
are three "positioning points" arranged in a
triangular formation. See Figures 10 and 11.
The pads at Gvardeysk appear to be ori-
ented toward the west, while the ones at Balki
are oriented toward the south. The absence of
equipment at both sites precludes identification
of the system to be associated with these facili-
ties; however, their locations, orientations, and
the fact that the sites are associated with MRBMs
suggest deployment of a new MRBM system--
possibly in a mobile mode.
Similar modification activity is suspected
but not confirmed at the one remaining site
at each of the Gvardeysk and Balki locations
and at the two sites at both Paplaka and
Mukachevo.
Kurgancha Fixed-Field Sites
Two new fixed-field sites have been con-
structed at the Kurgancha Complex. The
new sites each have four launch pads arranged
in a line much like the two older fixed-field
sites which have been inactive at Kurgancha
for some time. Near each launch position is
a set of small rectangular positions arranged
in a triangular pattern with the apex nearest
the launch position as shown in Figure 12.
The appearance of the small positions, which
resemble the "positioning points" at the fan-
shaped pads and Scaleboard sites, may indi-
cate that a new system is to be deployed at
Kurgancha.
25
25
Approved For Pa5ENT/1
and again on
25
 25X1 Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010027-7
Next 1 Page(s) In Document Exempt
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010027-7
 For Release 2003/1,
TOP SECRET
sive, including the construction of two rail-
served launch pads, designated G1A and G2A.
Also the old G2 missile-ready building was
lengthened and the propellant storage facili-
ties were enlarged. The addition of a wish-
bone pattern of rail lines forward of both
pads indicates a loading axis of 170 degrees,
as compared to 0 at the old SS-10
pads. This axis may represent a new handling
concept or it may indicate a change in launch
azimuth. Our assessment that the vehicle
associated with these pads is on the order of
100-110 feet long has been further substan-
tiated by the observance of two 95-foot mis-
siles, without payload, in the G1A/G2A launch
area. These missiles appear to be Scarp/
SS-9 airframes without payloads (Figure 14).
No construction progress has been observed
at the three single silos of Launch Group M
for nearly a year. Conversely, work has
continued at a rapid pace on three single silos
in Launch Group 0. Originally it was thought
that this group contained four single silos,
but recent photography has shown that only
three silos and one separate launch control
facility are being constructed. All the 0
silos are in a mid-stage of construction and
located in the western part of the test center.
Each site, including the LCF, was constructed
in a 200- by 100-foot excavation.
foot-diameter silo coring was sunk from the
floor of three of these excavations.
In the last few months construction of
the 0 silos has progressed considerably, with
Manzovka
The garage-type buildings seen at Kara
Babau and Drovyanaya, which house the mis-
sile TELs, have not yet been observed at
Manzovka. The MRBM support area near
Manzovka Site 1 contains several large build-
ings which could house TELs for both Sites
1 and 2; it is expected that garage-type build-
ings will be constructed at Manzovka.
ACTIVITIES AT TEST FACILITIES
TYURATAM MISSILE TEST CENTER
Since the 28th Revision, several
missions have provided good-to -excellent cov-
erage of certain sites at the TTMCC (Figure
13). Highlights of these coverages include
continued inactivity at Launch Group M and
at three single silos in the I group; observance
of an SS-11 propellant loading operation at
Site L9; and considerable construction pro-
gress at the single silos of Launch Group
0. Other significant activity concerns identi-
fication of missiles similar to the Scarp at
recently completed Launch Site G1A/G2A,
and the imminent completion of the triple-
silo Site 17.
Major modifications of Site G1/G2, orig-
inally used to launch the SS-10, were completed
in early 1968. The modifications were exten-
headworks and silo liners
identified at 01 , 02, and 04 (Figure 15).
Liner and headwork characteristics are sim-
ilar, if not identical, to Type IIIC single silos,
suggesting the 0 silos are related to a ve-
hicle of SS-9 size and class. Some tenuous
evidence suggests this system maybe other than
25
25
25X
25X
25X
Approved For sgRRE72,
 Approv
12/19: CIA-RDP78T04757A000300010027-7
25
25
d ForlPa5feR 11
t
nt
aI0,
eau
Approved ForTQPeaSEQRHJ
N aLLU 0
~a fl
O J SW
ur
m =z
25
 25X1 Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010027-7
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010027-7
 d For Bel-eas Q0f1 /19 : CIA-RDP78T04757A000300010027-7 25
a standard ICBM. Implied missile loading
orientations of the 0 silos differ radically,
suggesting that the intended azimuth of launch
from each silo will also be different. While
the significance of this unusual pattern is not
clear, such variations in launch direction might
be related to the testing of an orbital weapon
system.
A probable SS-11 propellant loading op-
eration was observed underway at Site 9 in
the L Group. (Fig-
ures 16 and 17) propellant transporters were
parked adjacent to this IIID silo. The door
was open on both days but the silo opening
was covered. Although the purpose of the
cover is not clear, it may have been used
to prevent propellant from entering the launch
tube. The activity on two successive days
probably indicates that fuel and oxidizer load-
ing operations were performed individually on
separate days. This activity strengthens our
previous assessment that the propellant is
loaded into the SS-11 after the canister con-
taining the missile is placed in the silo.
Little or no construction progress has
been observed at the single silos at Sites
12, 13, and 16 since circular headworks were
identified at
Whether this indicates abandonment or a con-
struction pause is unknown. Work has con-
25
25
Approved ForTQF4aSECRff 1 f /19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010027-7
 25X1 Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010027-7
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010027-7
 Apprave
Forfa~astej
25
25
25
Approved For fRlgpafif C&&1
 or R sjQj /f
tinued at the triple-silo 17 site and the
southernmost silo was essentially complete
A silo door similar in shape
to those at Type IIIC silos was identified
at one of the Site 17 silos which is nearing
completion. Site 17 could reach operational
status by late 1968.
Weapon system activities at the Plesetsk
Missile and Space Center (PMSC) indicate
continued emphasis on crew training and flight
testing. Facility construction has remained at
a high level. PMSC (Figure 18) now contains
38 identified launchers, of which 26 are com-
plete and 12 are under construction. Some
of these launchers are involved in the develop-
ment of at least two new weapon systems. One
of these systems is the solid propellant SS-13
(KY-6); the other is a new, apparently liquid-
fueled, system designated PL-1, which hasbeen
undergoing flight testing since
Other new or continuing activity at
Plesetsk involves: 1) the construction of a
hardened (buried) antenna and communications
receiving facility; 2) approaching completion of
the large receiving, inspection, and checkout
facility; 3). conversion to space use or deacti-
vation of the four operational SS-6 launchers;
4) observation of exercises of SS-13 loading
equipment at a training mock-up silo and at
Site 11; 5) approaching completion of seven
Type IIIE (SS-13) prototype single silos; 6)
identification of a probable Scrooge-type vehi-
cle at Site 21; 7) and a slowdown,
in the construction of the three
silos at Site 15.
Construction of additional communications
facilities began at the PMSC in mid-1967,
when a communications receiving facility was
started 1 nm north of the new airfield. This
facility now contains an arch-roofed control
25
25
25
25
25
25
Approved For R"sS $ir
 Approve
For ?apa ?ffl
building, several support structures, and about
15 Fishbone receiving antennas. This type
receiving facility usually operates in conjunc-
tion with day - night rhombic transmitting
antennas such as those identified in amid-stage
of construction at Plesetsk in
Construction also started on a hardened
(buried) communications antenna during early
1968. This antenna is located about 2 nm
southeast of the main support base in an area
previously associated with communications.
This is the first hardened (buried) antenna
to be identified at any of the Soviet test ranges.
Construction of a large receiving, inspec-
tion, and checkout facility near the main support
base is virtually complete. The presence of
two SS-13 transporter/erectors in the eastern
secured area of this facility indicates that the
area is missile associated. Conversely, facil-
ities in the western secured area probably are
related to the handling of space launch vehi-
cles. The western area contains a multi-
story masonry building (440 by 160 feet) which
resembles both the newly constructed space-
craft facility at Tyuratam Complex A and
the third assembly building at Plesetsk Site
2, which is complete.
Of the 15 original ICBM launchers at
Plesetsk, four have been deactivated; these
represented the total deployment of the SS-6.
One SS-6 launcher at Site 2 was modified for
a space role during 1964-1965 and is being
used to launch SS-6 boosted space vehicles.
Modification of service towers and lack of
operational activity at the other three SS-6
pads strongly implies deactivation. However,
conversion of additional SS-6 launchers for
space use is suggested by construction activity
underway at both Site 1 and in the support
area of Site 3.
Testing of the SS-13 (KY-6) has continued
at the PMSC, where ten silo launchers have
been associated with the solid propellant ICBM.
All ten silos are similar in appearance and
are deployed in an area some 20 nm east of
the original area where the operational SS-7,
SS-8, and space launchers are located. The
Plesetsk SS-13 launchers are at Site 11, which
has two silos, andSites 14, 17-20, and22-24,each
with only one silo. Sites 11 and 14 probably are
used for R&D firings. The others probably make
up at least part of a prototype launch group which
may be used primarily for training but which
also could have an operational capability under
certain conditions.
Construction of Sites 11 and 14 was start-
ed in late Site 11 was
not observed to be complete until
but the site probably could have supported the
first SS-13 launch from Plesetsk on
= Site 14 reached completion in late
Construction of Sites 17-20 was started at dif-
ferent times during while Sites 23 and
24 were started in early All of these
sites were nearing completion in
A missile loading operation was observed
at one of the Site 11 silos two days before
the firing of an SS-13. In
an exercise o loading equipment was
observed at the silo mock-up located in the
SS-13 ground support equipment facility near
the Plesetsk main support base (Figure 19).
These missile loading operations /exercises in-
volved the use of a transporter/loader (50
by 10 feet) which functions similarly to the
US Minuteman trailer. The vehicle appears
similar to a missile transporter/loader shown
on a Moscow TV program in
25
25
25
The absence of a launch control facility
at Sites 17-20 and 22-24 indicates that they
are controlled from off-site, probably the earth-
mounded control building at Site 12 where no
launcher has been identified. This earth-
mounded building is similar to the building
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
Approved For IJpaSEC 14/19: CIA-RDP78T04757A000300010027-7
 Appr~ed,For VostR /19 : CIA-RDP78T04757A000300010027-7
at the control facility for Launch Group L at
Tyuratam. Although the control building at
Site 12 at Plesetsk is similar to that for the
L group at Tyuratam, the sites differ in other
respects. The L group control site has a
launch silo and an L-shaped electronics facil-
ity; Site 12 has neither.
A limited amount of activity has been
observed at Sites 9 and 10 since our latest
revision. This activity involved rail tank cars
parked near propellant storage buildings and
gantries positioned on one of the two rail-
served pads at each site. At present only
one pad at each site is equipped with a gantry
160 feet high. Work on a second gantry is
nearing completion at Site 10 and material
for a second gantry is present at Site 9. The
completed gantry-equipped pads at these sites
probably have been capable of supporting
launches since late 1966.
Good coverage of the two soft pads at
both Site 21 and Site 16 and the three-launcher
hard site at 15 revealed that only the soft
launchers are complete. Site 21 was observed
on I Iwith no significant ac-
tivity apparent. On
Ihowever,atrans -
25
25Xi
25X
25X
Approved For RyOpsSF't2/f9 : CIA-RDP78T04757A000300010027-7
 X1
X1
X1
X1
Approveq
For. b gaqeaQ. i
porter/loader with canister erected was on one
of the pads (Figure 20). Although the photog-
raphy does not permit viewing the base of the
vehicle to determine whether it is wheeled or
tracked, its size and other characteristics are
similar to the Scrooge transporter -e rector-
launcher (TEL). The presence of this vehicle
and the collocation of Site 21 with the mul-
tiple silos at Site 15 imply that the system
may be intended for deployment in both fixed
and mobile modes. The increase in construc-
tion activity at the soft pads at about the time
that work slowed at the hard launchers at
Site 15 suggests that emphasis may now be
on the development of the mobile deployment
mode.
Flight testing of a vehicle, designated
PL-1, indicates that an R&D program which
may relate to a new weapon system is under-
way at the Plesetsk Missile and Space Center.
The limited amount of data gained does not
allow us to understand clearly what type of
system is undergoing test. Thus far there
have been five launches of what appears to
be a new liquid-propellant booster; these tests
may have had different objectives. The first
test on nded in failure
and the lack of participation by any known im-
pact area facilities suggested a space launch.
The four subsequent tests, two of which failed,
were clearly intended for impact on Kam-
chatka Peninsula. The long burning time of
the powered stage observed in telemetry is
more indicative of a space vehicle than a
ballistic missile. However, the apparent ac-
celerometer alignment in the vehicle is remi-
Soviet weapons systems tests. Based on the
data presently available, it is not possible to
determine whether these events are the early
tests of a space weapon system or a ballis-
tic missile system.
KAPUSTIN YAR MISSILE TEST CENTER
The only significant activity noted at the
Kapustin Yar Missile Test Center (Figure 21)
since the 28th Revision, involves Complex C.
A new field launch position has been con-
structed east of Launch Site 2C1. An SS-4
exercise was in progress at that position on
Construction activ-
Site 4C1, where it appears that the silo liner
is being repaired or modified. There is no
indication that the diameter of the silo at 4C1
is being changed as it was at the southwest
silo.
Compartments/rooms are being built in
the 50-foot (approximate) diameter circular
excavation at Launch Site 5C2, and large quan-
tities of construction materials are piled along
the road adjacent to the excavation. There
are similarities between this site and the
launch control facility 7A at the Yoshkar-Ola
ICBM Complex. Although the purpose of the
new facilities at Site 5C2 is not known they
appear to have some association with Launch
Site 6C.
Construction continues at Launch Site 6C,
where silos 6C2 and 6C3 are in late stages.
The headworks are in place and backfilling
is nearly complete. Little work has been done
at 6C1 since but construction
niscent of a ballistic missile and the I I materials remain nearby. Extensive ditching
I is evident throughout the area.
Approved For _A(IHf/1
25
25
25
25
 I For I VI' s ffk9 I
SA-5 SAM
LAUNCH FACILITY
SITE B
I
l I
I
SITE A Sk )s
R & D
\'LA UNCH AREA
SAM WARHEAD AREA_,
__ja?l?T5 ?a
MISSILE CHECKOUT
SAM HOUSING AND STORAGE AREA
AND SUPPORT AREA '"_-
----- Cable ground scar
? SA-2 SAM site
? Instrumentation site
0 SAM training site
INTER FE R&M E TES/
\ FINAL ASSEMBLY
AND CHECKOUT
AREA
COMPLEX N
COMPLEX E,"
e:---
2C
>e3C COMPLEX C
4
DT ..m, 6C
IID
'3D 20 COMPLEX O
AKHTUBINSK/VLADIMIROVKA
- AIRFIELD
25
25X
25X
Approved For R"s3RRt2
C2 A
MISSILE RECEIVING L /
AND CHECKOUT AREA AI/ ? COMPLEX A /
t ?` /i
V 4C ` A
TRANSMITTING AS
ARHEAD'.. CS '\
COMMO FACILITY W AREA
ti ?~~py COMPLEX B
 d Forfb "O l 1
ACTIVE
SITES
LAUNCH
POSITIONS
25
25
IA
IIA
IIB
IIC
IID
IIIA
IIIB
IIIC
IIID
IIIE
3
5
29
7
30
23
3
224
644
22
4
10
58
14
60
69
9
224
644
22
0
10
58
14
60
69
9
156
520
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
68
124
22
IR
BM
III
13
50
50
0
IV
17
51
51
0
TOTALS
30
101
101
0
MR
BM
I
76
308
308
3
2
0
II
47
188
188
0
IV
21
84
84
0
FAN-SHAPED
PADS
2
INACTIVE
SITES
*Figures reflect 3 launch silos at Types IIIA and IIIB ICBM and Type IV IRBM sites, and 4
launch silos at Type IV MRBM sites. Types IIIC, IIID, and IIIE ICBM sites contain single
silos. Types I and II MRBMandType III IRBM soft sites have four launchers per site. The
one exception is the Type III IRBM site at Bereza, which has two launchers.
25
Approved ForTopaSECRET/1
 25X1
25X1
Aleysk
Group A (3)
Group B (8)
Group C (18)
Group D (22)
Dombarovskiy
Group A (3)
Group B (9)
Group C (15)
Group D (21)
Group E (31)
Group F (37)
Group G (44)
Group H (49)
Drovyanaya
Site A (1)
Site B (2)
Site C (4)
Site D (3)
Site E (5)
Site F (6)
Group G (8)
Group H (15)
Group I (33)
Group J (44)
Group K (53)
Gladkaya
Site A (3)
Site B (2)
Site D (5)
Group F (7)
Group G (23)
Group H (27)
Group I (35)
Group J (49)
Group K (60)
Imeni Gastello
Group A (4)
Group B (7)
Group C (17)
Group D (22)
Group E (29)
Site (34) F
Site (32) F
Site (33) F
Site (35) F
Site (36) F
Itatka
Site (1)
Site (2)
Site (3)
Kartaly
Group A (1)
Group B (8)
Group C (14)
Group D (29)
Group E (32)
Site (39) F
Site (40) F
Site (41) F
d For Top s e l
Type
Grp/
Site
52-34N 082-42E IIIC
52-18N 082-49E IIIC
52-24N 083-05E IIIC
52-24N 083-29E IIIC
No of
Launchers
Soft Hard
Group/Site
Negated
Status of Site
When Last
Observed**
Est Opera-
tional Status
Operational
Operational
Operational
U/C
Quarter Group/Site
Est to be Opnl
1 2 3 4
66
67
68
51-07N 059-38E IIIC 6
51-06N 059-51E IIIC 6
50-45N 059-36E IIIC 6
50-52N 060-OOE IIIC 6
51-04N 060-13E IIIC 6
51-20N 059-52E IIIC 6
51-31N 059-58E IIIC 6
50-58N 060-31E IIIC 6
51-25N 113-OOE [IB 2
51-25N 113-04E IIIA 3
51-28N 113-04E IID 2
51-20N 113-O1E IID 2
51-23N 112-50E IIIA 3
51-20N 112-55E IIIA 3
51-35N 113-05E HID 10
51-27N 113-02E HID 10
51-35N 113-26E HID 10
51-16N 113-18E IIID 10
51-26N 113-18E IIID 10
56-20N 092-20E IID 2
56-25N 092-27E LID 2
56-21N 092-15E IIIA 3
56-15N 092-15E HID 10
56-13N 091-50E HID 10
56-14N 092-38E HID 10
56-19N 093-04E IIID 10
56-26N 092-39E HID 10
56-37N 093-06E HID 10
51-07N 066-12E IIIC 6
50-57N 066-OSE [HC 6
51-02N 065-41E IIIC 6
51-26N 066-08E IIIC 6
51-07N 065-44E IIIC 6
51-31N 065-40E IIIC 1
51-24N 065-49E IIIC 1
51-29N 065-48K IIIC 1
51-27N 065-32E IIIC 1
51-21N 065-35E IIIC I
56-59N 085-32E LLB 2
57-OIN 085-39E [IB 2
56-54N 085-39E [ID 2
53-02N 060-26E IIIC 6
53-08N 060-33E IIIC 6
53-01N 060-47E IIIC 6
52-37N 060-37E IIIC 6
52-43N 060-24E IIIC 6
53-04N 060-47E IIIC 1
53-11N 060-50E IIIC 1
53-04N 060-57E IIIC 1
Approved For FWsSWRJ2
C Operational 66
C Operational 67
C Operational 67
C Operational 67
C Operational 68
L Operational 68
M U/C 69
E U/C 69
C Operational 63
C Operational 64
C Operational 63
C Operational 64
C Operational 64
C Operational 64
C Operational 66
C Operational 66
C Operational 67
C Operational 67
C Operational 67
C Operational
C Operational 64
C Operational
C Operational
C Operational
C Operational 67
C Operational 67
C Operational 67
C Operational 67
C Operational 66
C Operational 66
C Operational 67
C Operational 68
M U/C 69
M U/C 69
E U/C 69
M U,'C 69
M U/C 69
M U/C 69
C Operational 62
C Operational 63
C Operational
C Operational 66
C Operational 66
C Operational 67
C Operational 68
M U/C 69
E U/C 69
E U/C 69
E U/C 69
25
25
25
25
 dFor1 FIE&
Type
Grp/
No of
Launchers
Group/Site
Status of Site
When Last
Est Opera-
tional Status
Quarter Group/Site
Est to be Opnl
Site
Soft
Hard
Negated
Observed**
II
1 2
3
4
Site A (1)
58-02N 041-21E IIB
Operational 62
Site B (2)
58-02N 041-06E IIB
Operational 62
Site C (3)
57-59N 041-09E IIB
Operational
62
Site D (4)
58-05N 041-39E IIB
Operational 63
Site E (5)
57-58N 041-14E ILIA
Operational
63
Site F (6)
57-55N 041-IOE IID 2
Operational
63
Site G (7)
58-07N 041-32E IID 2
Operational 64
Group 1 (21)
57-51N 041-16E IIID
10
Operational 68
Group J (12)
58-06N 041-36E IIID
10
Operational
68
Group K (38)
57-39N 041-1OE IIID
10
U/C
68
Group L (48)
57-49N 041-19E HID
10
U/C
68
Site (60) M
57-52N 041-45E HID
1
U/C 69
Site (61) M
57-54N 041-34E IIID
1
U/C 69
Site (62) M
57-57N 041.45E IIID
1
U/C 69
Site (63) M
57-51N 041-38E IIID
1
U/C 69
Site (64) M
57-55N 041-50E IIID
I
U/C 69
Koz els k
Site A (3)
55-54N 035-45E IIC 2
C Operational
63
Site B (2)
53-49N 035-47E IIC 2
C Operational
63
Site D (4)
53-54N 035-51E IIC 2
C Operational
63
Site E (5)
53-.(1N 035-41E IIIB
3
C Operational 64
Site F (6)
53-41N 035.39E IIIB
3
C Operational
64
Group G (7)
53-48N 035-48E HID
10
C Operational
67
Group H (15)
54-02N 035-27E IIID
10
C Operational
67
Group I (32)
53-54N 035-53E IIID
10
C Operational
67
Group J (48)
54-IIN 035-40E IIID
10
C Operational 68
Group K (56)
54-28N 035-32E IIID
10
L U/C
68
Group L (63)
53-46N 035-29E IIID
10
L U/C
68
Group M (69)
54-17N 035-14E IIID
10
M U/C 69
Site (89) N
54-OON 035-15E IIID
1
U U/C
69
Site (90) N
53-59N 035-07E IIID
1
U U/C
69
Site (91) N
54-01N 034-59E IIID
1
U U/C
69
Novosibirsk
Site 1
55-19N 083-02E IIIA
C Operational 63
Site 2
55-19N 083-10E IIB 2
C Operational 63
Site 3
55-23N 082-55E IIIA
C Operational
64
Site 4
55-22N 083-14E IID 2
C Operational
63
Site 5
55-20N 082-56E lID 2
C Operational 64
Olovyannaya
Site A (1)
50-54N 115-48E IIIA
3
C Operational 64
Site B (2)
50-55N 115-45E IIIA
3
C Operational
64
Site C (3)
51-O1N 115-57E IIIA
3
C Operational
64
Group D (7)
51-04N 116-05E HID
10
C Operational
66
Group E (17)
50-56N 115-58E IIID
10
C Operational
66
Group F (40)
50-50N 116-04E 111D
10
C Operational
66
Group G (25)
50-44N 115-45E IIID
10
C Operational 67
Group H (46)
50-40N 115-58E IIID
10
C Operational 67
Group I (55)
50-58N 11.6-12E I1ID
10
C Operational
67
Group J (60)
50-34N 115-56E IIID
10
C Operational 67
Group K (63)
51-12N 116-OOE 1I1D
10
C Operational
67
Group L (90)
50-52N 116-33E IIID
10
C Operational 68
Omsk
Site (1)
25
25
25
25
Approved For iPa ?R3T
 Approve
For TIR?a t&
25
Type
Gr
/
No of
Launchers
Group/Site
Status of Site
When Last
Est Opera-
tional Status
Quarter Group/Site
Est to be Opnl
p
d
t
d
N
Observed**
1 2 3 4
Site
Soft Har
ega
e
25
Perm
Site A (1)
57-41N 0
56-12E I:B
25
Site B (2)
57-44N 0
55-55E IIB
Operational 62
Site C (3)
57-37N 0
56-OSE IIB
Operational 63
Site D (5)
57-42N 0
55-47E IID
Operational 64
Site E (6)
57-45N 0
56-OOE III)
Operational 63
Site F (4)
57-41N 0
56-04E IIIA 3
Operational 64
Group G (13)
57-44N 0
56-17E IIID 10
Operational 66
Group H (29)
57-50N 0
56-28E IIID 10
Operational 67
Group I (10)
57-43N 0
55-51E IIID 10
Operational 66
Group J (49)
57-32N 0
56-44E HID 10
Operational 67
Group K (70)
57-42N 0
56-41E HID 10
U/C
Site (72) L
57-39N 0
56-26E HID 1
U/C 69
Site (75) L
57-37N 0
56-27E IIID 1
U/C 69
Site (76) L
57-35N 0
56-19E IIID 1
U/C 69
Sit
77
L
57-38N 0
56-21E IIID I
U/C 69
e (
)
Site (78) L
56-36N 0
56-14E IIID 1
U/C 69
Site (79) I,
57-33N 0
56-29E IIID 1
U/C 69
Plesetsk
1
i
62-56N 0
40-27E IA 2
C Converted from SS-6
)
te (
S
Site (2)
62-56N
040-32E IA 1
C Converted from SS-6
Site (3)
62-58N 0
40 -41E IA 1
C Converted from SS-6
Site (4)
62-59N 0
40-47E IIA 2
C Operational
Sit
(5)
63-03N 0
40-57E IIB 2
C Operational 62
e
Site (6)
63-01N 0
40-53E ILIA
C Operational 63
Site (7)
62-51N 0
40-35E IIC 2
C Operational 63
Sit
8
62-54N 0
40-47E IIC 2
C Operational 63
e (
)
For Sites 9-24,
s
lities, Tyuratam and Plesetsk Missile TestCenters
Shadrinsk
Site (1)
56-08N 0
63-50E ILIA 3
C Operational
Site (2)
56-10N 0
64-O1E ILIA 3
C Operational 64
Site (3)
56-07N
063-56E ILIA 3
C Operational
Svobodnyy
erational 62
C O
Site A (3)
51-55N
128-09E 11B 2
p
62
Site B (1)
51-49N
128-18E IIB 2
C Operational
Site C (2)
51-53N
128-23E IIB 2
C Operational 62
Site D (4)
51-58N
128-06E IID 2
C Operational 64
6
Site E (6)
51-43N
127-59E IID 2
3
C Operational
6
Site F (5)
51-5I N
128-12E IID 2
3
C Operational
64
Site G (7)
51-3sN
127-57E ILIA
C Operational
Site H (8)
52-03N
128-04E HD 2
C Operational 64
67
Group I (11)
51-53N
128-11E IIID 10
C Operational
Group J (18)
51-43N
127-56E IIID 10
C Operational 67
Group K (25)
51-27N
127-56E HID 10
C Operational 67
Group L (40)
51-16N
127-39E HID 10
C Operational 67
Group M (58)
51-39N
128-15E IIID 10
C Operational 68
Group N (67)
51-50N
128-22E IIID 10
C Operational 68
Tatishchevo
Group A (1)
51-48N
045-40E :IID 10
C Operational 66
Group B (12)
51-37N
045-30E HID 10
C Operational 66
Group C (26)
51-29N
045-10E HID 10
C Operational 66
Group D (36)
51-43N
045-14E 1111) 10
C Operational 67
Group E (77)
51-55N
045-50E HID 10
C Operational 67
Group F (58)
51-53N
045-20E 1110 10
C Operational 67
Group G (67)
52-03N
045-27E HID 10
C Operational 67
Group H (110
)
52-09N
045-39E RID 10
C Operational
Group 1(91)
52-15N
045-23E IIID 10
C Operational 67
Group J (94)
52-OON
046-03E HID 10
C Operational 67
Group K (124
)
51-51N
046-OSE IIID 10
C Operational 67
Group L (146
)
51-40N
045-42E HID 10
M Operational 68
25
Approved For R ($RsSK T2i1
 Approvo
Type
Grp/
No of
Launchers
Group/Site
Status of Site
When Last
Est Opera- Quarter Group/Site
tional Status Est to be Opnl
Site
Soft
Hard
Negated
Observed**
1 2 3 4
Site (1)
56-55N 040-27E IIB
Operational 62
Site (2)
56-56N 040-33E IIB
Operational 62
Site (3)
56-55N 040-17E IIB
Operational 63
Site (4)
56-59N 040-40E IIB
Operational 63
Site (5)
56-49N 040-10E IIB
Operational 63
Site (6)
56-55N 040-22E IIB
Operational 64
Group A (13)
56-52N 040-44E IIID
10
U/C 68
Group B (23)
56-42N 040-26E IIID
10
U/C 69
Site (24) C
56-55N 040-18E IIID
1
U/C 69
Site (25) C
56-56N 040-23E IIID
1
U/C 69
Site (33) C
56-55N 040-14E IIID
1
U/C 69
Site (34) C
56-57N 040-14E IIID
1
U/C 69
Site (35) C
56-57N 040-OSE 11I1)
1
U/C 69
Site (36) C
56-53N 040-06E IIID
1
U/C 69
Site (37) D
56-25N 039-52E IBD
1
U/C 69
Site (38) D
56-22N 039-49E IIID
1
U/C 69
Tyumen
Site (2)
56-51N 065-27E IIC 2
C Operational 63
Site (3)
56-52N 065-34E TIC 2
C Operational 63
For Tyuratam S
it
unch Facilities, Tyuratam and Plesetsk Missile
Test Centers
Uzhur
Group A (2)
5-18N 089-38E IIIC
6
C Operational 66
Group B (8)
55-19N 089-20E IIIC
6
C Operational
Group C (12)
55-07N 089-38E IIIC
6
C Operational 67
Group D (21)
15.03N 089-25E IIIC
6
C Operational 67
Group E (27)
55-15N 089.54E IIIC
6
C Operational 67
Group F (34)
55-13N 090-15E IIIC
6
M U/C 68
Group G (43)
55-21N 090-44E IIIC
6
M U/C 68
Group & (46)
55-34N 089-31E IIIC
6
E U/C 69
Verkhnyaya Sald
Site (1)
a
58-06N 060-22E IIA
2
C Operational
Site (2)
58-09N 060-16E IIB
2
C Operational 62
Site (3)
58-ION 060-28E IIA
2
C Operational
Site (4)
58-12N 060-35E IIB
2
C Operational 62
Site (5)
58-14N 060-55E IIB
2
C Operational
Site (7)
58-14N 060-41E IIIA
3
C Operational 63
Site (8)
58-13N 060-49E IIIA
3
C Operational
Site (9)
58-05N 060-12E IID
2
C Operational
Site (10)
58-OSN 060-32E IID
2
C Operational
Yedrovo
Site A (2)
57-48N 033-36E IIB
2
C Operational 62
Site B (1)
57-48N 033-14E IIB
2
C Operational 62
Site C (5)
57-49N 033-OSE IID
2
C Operational 63
Site D (4)
57-48N 033-28E HD
2
C Operational 63
Site E (8)
57-52N 033-18E IIIA
3
C Operational 64
Site F (6)
57-47N 033-06E IID
2
C Operational 63
Site G (7)
57-47N 033-02E IID
2
C Operational 64
Site H (3)
57-52N 033-27E IIIA
3
C Operational 63
Group I (11)
57-52N 033-37E HID
10
C Operational 67
Group J (27)
57-48N 033-13E IIID
10
C Operational 67
Group K (37)
57-58N 033-40E 1110
10
C Operational 68
Group L (41)
57-47N 033-53E IIID
10
C Operational 68
Group M (64)
58-07N 033-08E IIID
10
M U/C 68
Group N (76)
57-31N 032-52E IIID
10
U U/C 69
Site (82) 0
57-31N 032-52E HID
1
U U/C 69
Site (83) 0
57-30N 032-46E IIID
1
U U/C 69
Approved ForWRaSECR?1/1
 a r o r T6tp s?yyn I
Type
Grp/
Site
Site (2)
Site (3)
Site (4)
Site (5)
Site (6)
Site (8)
Site (9)
Site (10)
Site (12)
Site (13)
Site (14)
Site (16)
Site (17)
Site (18)
Site (25)
Site (27)
Site (28)
Site (29)
Site (30)
Site (31)
Site (32)
Site (34)
Site (1)
Site (2)
Site (3)
Site (4)
Site (5)
Site (6)
Site (9)
Site (10)
Site (11)
Group B (10)
Group C (14)
Group D (21)
Group E (30)
No of
Launchers
Soft Hard
56-35N 048-18E 1:0 2
56-32N 048-27E IIB 2
56-31N 048-20E HD 2
56-44N 048-42E IIIE 1
56-48N 048-20E IRE 1
56-55N 048-16E IIIE 1
57-OON 048-26E HIE 1
59-21N 049-14E IIB 2
59-11N 049-47E IID 2
59-06N 049-46E IN) 2
Status of Site
When Last
Observed**
Est Opera-
tional Status
Quarter Group/Site
Est to be Opnl
1 2 3 4
C Operational 62
C Operational 62
C Operational 63
C Operational 63
C Operational 63
C Operational 64
L U/C 69
L U/C 69
NI U/C 69
L U/C 69
L U/C 69
M U/C 69
NI U/C 69
L U/C 69
M U/C 69
NI U/C 69
M U/C 69
M U/C 69
M U/C 69
NI U/C 69
N1 U/C 70
M U/C 70
M U/C 69
E U/C 69
M U/C 70
E U/C TO
E U/C 70
E U/C 70
U/C 69
U/C 69
U/C 70
C Operational 61
C Operational 61
C Operational 62
C Operational 62
C Operational 62
C Operational 64
C Operational 63
C Operational 63
C Operational 64
C Operational 64
C Operational 64
49-22N 080-.58E IIIC 6
49-10N 081-22E IIIC 6
Group/Site
Negated
*For launch groups, TDI number, BE number, and coordinates are those of the group control site.
**E = early; M = midstage; L = late; C = complete; U = undetermined.
***No grouping established so IDC estimated about two years after estimated start of construction.
C Operational
C Operational
C Operational
C Operational
M U/C
U U/C
25
S.
25
25
25X
Approved For RppsSK2j
 X1
TOP SECRET
Table 3. Summary Evaluation of R&D and Training Launch Facilities, Tyuratam and Plesetsk Missile Test Centers
TYURATAM
Launch Complex A
Site Al
Site A2
Site A3
Launch Complex B
Site 131
Site B2
Launch Complex C
Site C1
Site C2
Site C3
Launch Complex D
Site D1
Site D2
Launch Complex E
Site El
Site E2
Site E3
Launch Complex F
Launch Complex G
Site G1-G2
Site G3-G4
Site G5-G6
Launch Complex H
Launch Group I
Site 11
Site 12
Site 13
Site 14
Site 15
Site 16
Site 17
Launch Complex J
Launch Group K
Site K1
Site K2
Site K3
Launch Group L
Launch Group M
Site Ml
Site M2
Site M3
Launch Group N
Site Ni
Site N2
Site N3
Launch Group 0
Site 01
Site 02
Site 04
Control Site 03
Type of
Site
Number of
Launchers
Soft Hard
45-55N 63-21E 1
45-55N 63-21E 1
1
46-OON 63-34E IA
46-OON 63-34E II
45-48N 63-38E II
45-48N 63-39E II
45-48N 63-39E II
45-59N 63-57E IIIA
45-59N 63-57E IIIA
45-48N 63-12E IIC
45-48N 63-12E IIC
45-48N 63-12E IIC
46-02N 63-06E IIIB
46-03N 62-56E I
46-03N 62-56E I
46-05N 62-54E II
45-59N 63-42E I
45-56N 63-26E IIIC
45-57N 63-26E III
45-57N 63-26E III
45-54N 63-20E IIIC
45-59N 63-33E IIIC
46-OON 63-31E III
45-57N 063-28E III
45-54N 63-54E I
46-02N 63-03E IIIC
46-02N 63-03E IIIC
46-04N 62-56E IIIC
46-02N 63-02E IIID
46-04N 62-57E III
46-04N 62-57E III
46-OON 63-IOE III
45-56N 63-03E III
45-59N 62-54E III
46-O1N 63-03E N/A
Approved ForTGNWM/1
Stage of Const on Latest
Usable Coverage
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
MID
MID
Complete
Complete
Early
Late
Late
Complete
Complete
Complete
MID
MID
MID
Complete
Complete
Complete
MID
MID
MID
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
U/C
U/C
Operational
Operational
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
Operational
Operational
Operational
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
25
 Approved For Release 2003/1
- -
25
TOP SECRET
Location
T~
Type of
Site
~
Stage of Const on Latest
Usable Coverage
T~
PLESETSK
Site 9
62-53N 40-51E IB 2 L ate U/C
Site 10
62-53N 40-52E IB 2 Late U/C
Site 11
62-58N 41-27E Dual IIIE 2 Complete Operational
Launch Control 12A
62-58N 41-32E L ate U/C
Site 13
62--52N 40-44E II 2 Complete Operational
Site 14
62-58N 41-34E IIIE 1 Complete Operational
Site 15
62-58N 41-24E III 3 Late U/C
Site 16
62-47N 40-35E II 2 Complete Operational
Site 17
62-55N 41-24E IIIE 1 L ate U/C
Site 18
62-58N 41-40E IIIE 1 L ate U/C
Site 19
62-56N 41-36E IIIE 1 Late U/C
Site 20
62-55N 41-40E IIIE 1 Late U/C
Site 21
62-58N 41-23E II 2 Complete Operational
Site 22
62-53N 41-46E IIIE 1 Late U/C
Site 23
63-O1N 41-32E IIIE 1 Late U/C
Site 24
63-O1N 41-33E IIIE 1 Late U/C
25X
Approved For R9112/
 Approve
For RgJRst2(143L'l2
Table 4. Summary Evaluation of Soviet IRBM Deployment.
No of Pads/
Launchers
AKTYUBINSK Launch Complex
PETROVSKIY
GELLI Launch Complex
KAKASHURA
42-38N
47-27E IV Operational
GELLI
42-46N
47-28E IV Operational
PARAUL
42-47N
47-23E IV Operational
GRANOV Launch Complex
GRANOVI
48-56N
29-30E III Operational
GRANOV 2
48-50N
29-28E IV Operational
KALNIK
48-59N
29-21E IV Operational
KROLEVETS Launch Complex
KROLEVETS 1
51-36N
33-29E III Operational
KROLEVETS2
51-40N
33-31E III Operational
BEREZA
51-43N
33-43E III Operational
LEBEDIN Launch Complex
LEBEDIN 1
50-32N
34-25E III Operational
LEBEDIN 2
50-35N
34-24E III Operational
LEBEDIN 3
50-37N
34-27E III Operational
NIGRANDE Launch Complex
NIGRANDE
56-31N
22-02E III Operational
SKRUNDA
56-35N
21-49E IV Operational
VAINODE
56-28N
21-50E IV Operational
NOVOSYSOYEVKA Launch Complex
NOVOSYSOYEVKA 1
44-11N
133-26E III Ope rational
NOVOSYSOYEVKA 2
44-07N
133-28E IV Operational
PERVOMAYSK Launch Complex
KAMENNYY MOST
47-58N
30-53E IV Operational
SEMENOVKA 1
47-58N
30-58E IV Operational
SEMENOVKA 2
47-53N
30-58E IV Operational
SARY OZEK Launch Complex
KARA BABAU 1
44-31N
77-46E III Operational
KARA BABAU 2
44-30N
77-59E IV Operational
KARA BABAU 3
44-31N
77-41E IV Operational
SMORGON Launch Complex
SMORGON 1
54-31N
26-17E III Operational
SMORGON 2
54-26N
26-18E IV Operational
SMORGON3
54-36N
26-22E III Operational
TAYBOLA Launch Complex
TAYBOLAI
68-28N
33-15E IV Operational
TAYBOLA 2
68-30N
33-22E IV Operational
UGOLNYY Launch Complex
UGOLNYY
Approved For F 1ea$M1
25
25
 X1
Approved For Release 2003/
TOP SECRET
X1
AKHTYRKA Launch Complex
AKHTYRKAI
AKHTYRKA 2
ALUKSNE Launch Complex
LEJASCIEMSI
RUSKI
LEJASCIEMS 2
ANASTASYEVKA Launch Complex
ANASTASYEVKA 1
ANASTASYEVKA 2
BALTA Launch Complex
BALTA 1
BALTA 2
BARANO-ORENBURGSKOYE
Launch Complex
SOME ALEKSEYEVSKOYE
BARANO-ORENBURGSKOYE
BELOKOROVICHI Launch Complex
OLEVSK 1
OLEVSK 2
RUDNYA ZLOTINSKAYA
BORSHCHEV Launch Complex
SKALA PODOLSKAYAI
SKALA PODOLSKAYA 2
BREST Launch Complex
BREST 1
BREST 2
BRODY Launch Complex
BRODY 1
BRODY 2
BERESTECHKO
DERAZHNYA Launch Complex
DERAZHNYA1
DERAZHNYA 2
KHMELNITSKIY
DISNA Launch Complex
DISNA
ZELKI
BORKOVICHI
DOLINA Launch Complex
DOLINA 1
DOLINA 2
BOLEKHOV
[BE Number
0-16N 34-50E II
150-22N 34-57E II
57-20N 26-44E II
57-25N 26-49E II
57-13N 26-33E IV
48-34N 135-37E II
48-36N 135-41E II
48-O1N 29-34E II
48-07N 29-34E II
44-15N 131-22E I
44-20N 131-30E I
51-08N 27-59E I
51-ION 28-03E I
51-03N 28-07E IV
48-51N 26-08E I
48-52N 26-03E I
51-48N 24-OOE II
51-51N 24-O1E II
50-06N 25-12E IV
50-12N 25-05E I
50-20N 25-05E I
49-20N 27-26E If
49-26N 27-28E II
49-24N 27-08E IV
55-35N 28-16E I
55-35N 28-24E I
55-41N 28-27E II
49-03N 24-03E I
49-06N 24-08E I
49-06N 23-51E IV
No of Pads/
Launchers
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
25
25X
Approved For FTqWEHM@Tl
 For RR0psSF t2
DROGOBYCH Launch Complex
MEDENITSA
DROGOBYCH
STRYY
DYATLOVO Launch Complex
DYATLOVO
BEREZOVKA
ZBLYANY
GOMEL Launch Complex
BORKHOVI
BORKHOV 2
GRESK Launch Complex
GRESK 1
GRESK 2
URECHYE
GROZNYY Launch Complex
SUNZHENSKOYE
NESTEROVSKAYA
ACHKHOY-MARTAN
GUSEV Launch Complex
GUSEV 1
GUSEV 2
JELGAVA Launch Complex
IECAVA 1
IECAVA 2
IECAVA 3
JONAVA Launch Complex
KARMELAVA
JONAVA
KAMENETS-PODOLSKIY
Launch Complex
KAMENETS-PODOLSKIY
DUNAYEVTSY
KIVERTSY Launch Complex
KIVERTSY 1
KIVERTSY 2
TROSTYANETS
KONKOVICHI Launch Complex
PETRIKOV
KONKOVICHI
Approved For Qas~ -9&/1
No of Pads/
Launchers
49-22N 23-45E I
49-25N 23-34E I
49-16N 23-42E IV
53-32N 25-17E I
53-35N 25-27E I
53-35N 25-17E II
52-18N 30-42E II
52-24N 30-38E II
53-14N 27-42E I
53-16N 27-40E I
53-11N 27-58E II
43-OSN 44-54E I
43-11N 44-57E I
43-ION 45-IOE IV
54-41N 22-04E I
54-44N 22-03E I
56-35N 24-04E II
56-39N 24-07E II
56-33N 24-20E IV
54-57N 24-05E II
55-OON 24-14E II
48-51N 26-42E II
48-55N 26-59E II
50-53N 25-30E I
50-56N 25-36E I
50-58N 25-39E II
52-ION 28-34E I
52-15N 28-37E I
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
25
25
 X1
Forf&ag2f
X1
KOROSTEN Launch Complex
KOROSTEN 1
KOROSTEN 2
KOZHANOVICHI Launch Complex
KOZHANOVICHI 1
KOZHANOVICHI 2
KRASNOZNAMENSK Launch Complex
VIESVILLE
RAGNIT
KREMOVO Launch Complex
KREMOVO
LYALICHI
KURGANCHA Launch Complex
KURGANCHAI
KURGANCHA 2
TYM
LIDA Launch Complex
LIDA 1
LIDA 2
LUTSK Launch Complex
LUTSK 1
LUTSK 2
VLADIMIR-VOLYNSKIY
MAYKOP Launch Complex
KURDZHIPSKAYA
SHIRVANSKAYA
MOLOSKOVITSY Launch Complex
MOLOSKOVITSY 1
MOLOSKOVITSY 2
GURLEVO
NADVORNAYA Launch Complex
PARYSHCHE
NOVA VES
OTYNYA
OSTROG Launch Complex
OSTROG 1
OSTROG 2
OSTROV Launch Complex
ASANOVSHCHINA
SHEVELEVO
REDKINO
Approved For sa RfjT2~
~5-O1N 22-23E I
5-01N 22-11E I
14-O1N 132-19E I
114-02N 132-26E I
9-37N 65-57E I
39-36N 65-52E I
39-35N 65-42E IV
53-47N 25-20E I
53-57N 25-27E I
50-46N 25-02E I
50-50N 25-03E I
50-48N 24-42E IV
44-31N 40-OOE II
44-25N 39-53E IV
59-28N 29-05E II
59-29N 29-12E II
59-25N 28-54E IV
48-37N 24-42E I
48-39N 24-48E I
48-47N 24-50E IV
50-14N 26-43E I
50-17N 26-41E I
57-31N 28-12E I
57-37N 28-11E I
57-24N 28-26E IV
No of Pads/
Launchers
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
25
25
 For AUYTECREl - -
PINSK Launch Complex
IVANOVO
MOTOL
POLOTSK Launch Complex
POLOTSKI
POLOTSK 2
POSTAVY Launch Complex
POSTAVY 1
KOZYANY
POSTAVY 2
PRUZHANY Launch Complex
PRUZHANYI
PRUZHANY 2
RAKVERE Launch Complex
SIMUNA
VAIKE MAARJA
RISTI Launch Complex
RISTI 1
RISTI 2
RUZHANY Launch Complex
KRUPA 1
KRUPA 2
SATEIKIAI Launch Complex
SALANTAII
SALANTAI2
ZEMAICIU KALVARIJA
SLONIM Launch Complex
BYTEN 1
BYTEN 2
SOKAL Launch Complex
SOKAL 1
SOKAL 2
SOKAL 3
SOVETSK Launch Complex
SLAVSK 1
SLAVSK 2
Approved ForTQPeaaCaff/j
No of Pads/
Launchers
52-ION
25-41E I Operational
52-12N
25-44E I Operational
55-22N
28-44E II Operational
55-24N
28-33E II Operational
55-09N
26-53E II Operational
55-20N
26-51E II Operational
55-06N
27-OOE IV Operational
52-30N
24-08E II Operational
52-33N
24-06E II Operational
59-08N
26-26E II Operational
59-11N
26-20E II Operational
59-04N
24-04E I Operational
59-07N
24-06E I Operational
52-47N
24-42E II Operational
52-49N
24-45E II Operational
55-59N
21-38E I Operational
56-02N
21-41E I Operational
56-O1N
21-54E IV Operational
52-52N
25-21E I Operational
52-55N
25-21E I Operational
50-22N
24-18E I Operational
50-27N
24-20E I Operational
50-20N
24-26E IV Operational
54-59N
21-36E I Operational
54-59N
21-28E I Operational
25
25
 X1
A ra Quad For 1- Release QQ-3-L]
X1
SUCHAN Launch Complex
NOVITSKOYE
SEVERNYY SUCHAN
TAURAGE Launch Complex
TAURAGE1
TAURAGE3
TORVA Launch Complex
TORVA 1
TORVA 2
TSIRGULIINA
UKMERGE Launch Complex
VEPRIAI
UKMERGE
UMAN Launch Complex
MOLODETSKOYE
MANKOVKA
KISHENTSY
USOVO Launch Complex
OVRUCH1
OVRUCH 2
LIPNIKI
VORU Launch Complex
VORU 1
VORU 2
VSELYUB Launch Complex
VSELYUB 1
VSELYUB 2
YELSK Launch Complex
YELSK 1
YELSK 2
ZAGARE Launch Complex
ZAGARE 1
ZAGARE 2
LIELELEJA
ZHITOMIR Launch Complex
ZHITOMIR 1
ZHITOMIR 2
BERDICHEV
ZHMERINKA Launch Complex
GNIVAN
Z HMERINKA
VINNITSA
ZNAMENSK Launch Complex
ZNAMENSK 1
ZNAMENSK 2
No of Pads/
Launchers
43-01N 133-17E I
43-ION 133-20E I
55-10N 22-20E I
55-05N 22-19E I
57-56N 26-04E I
57-59N 26-05E I
57-49N 26-12E IV
55-07N 24-38E I
55-IIN 24-42E I
48-53N 30-27E I
48-57N 30-24E I
49-OON 30-13E IV
51-17N 28-16E I
51-18N 28-10E I
51-12N 28-26E II
57-45N 26-47E II
57-49N 26-50E II
53-45N 25-42E I
53-47N 25-46E I
51-42N 29-12E I
51-47N 29-18E I
56-23N 23-19E I
56-28N 23-21E I
56-24N 23-36E IV
50-04N 28-15E II
50-10N 28-16E II
50-05N 28-22E I:
49-08N 28-11E I;
49-10N 28-04E II
49-17N 28-20E IV
54-32N 21-10E I
54-35N 21-07E I
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Approved For If 4E05T1
25
25
 X1
ed For TOPaSECRET1
25
Table 6. Fan-Shaped Pads and Ina
ctive MRBM
Launch Si
tes
No of
Laun
Pads/
chers
X1 G
VARDEYSK Launch Complex
GVARDEYSK 1
54-40N
21-07E
I
4 6/7 fan-shaped
pads
M
GVARDEYSK 2
UKACHEVO Launch Complex
54-45N
21-09E
I
4 Inactive
MUKACHEVO 1
48-18N
22-30E
I
4 Inactive
P
MUKACHEVO 2
APLAKA Launch Complex
48-19N
22-37E
I
4 Inactive
PAPLAKAI
56-22N
21-17E
I
4 Inactive
S
PAPLAKA 2
IMFEROPOL Launch Complex
56-25N
21-16E
I
4 Inactive
MAZANKA
44-53N
34-19E
I
4 Inactive
BALKI
44-56N
34-26E
I
4 7 fan-shaped
pads
25
Approved ForTopaMMIT/1
 25
Stage of
Number of
Construction
Complex/Area/Site
BE
Coordinates
Type of
Positions
Site
on Latest
Remarks
Number
Site
Pad Silo
Negated
Usable Coverage
Table 7. Summary Evaluation of Selected Launch Facilities, Kapustin Yar Missile Test Center
Launch Area 2C
*R&D/Trng site on first coverage,
p Prototype.
TOP SECRET
SRBM
R&D
R&D
Probable Space 1
Probable Space 1
48-35N 46-17E R&D/Trng 2
48-34N 46-17E R&D/Trng 1
48-34N 46-17E Type IV --
IRBM,
pads
Complete
Complete
Inactive
Operational
Abandoned
Abandoned
Complete Operational
Complete Undet
Complete Undet
Complete Operational
Complete Operational
Complete, operational
being modified (SW silo being
modified)
Complete Operational
Complete Operational
Never completed Abandoned
U/C
Complete Operational
Complete Abandoned
Complete Undet
48-33N 46-17E -- --
48-33N 46-17E -- 3
48-46N 46-18E Undet 1 --
48-24N 46-17E Trng 2 --
1 -1
25
25X
Approved For R91~se/
 App roe
Initial Operational
Capability (IOC)
Maximum operational
T
d ForTIOP SECRET
25
25
range (N.R.E.-nm)
6,500/5,500
6,000
6,500/5,000./
5,500
About 5,500
Reentry vehicle
3,500?500 3/
3,500?500
10,000?1,000 /
1,500?300
About 1,000
weight (lbs)
4,200?500
12,500?1,000/
Warhead weight (Ibs)
2,800?4003/
2,800?400
8,000?1,000
1,100?300
About 750
3,300?400
10,000?1,000 A/
Accuracy (CEP-nm)5/
1.0-1.25
1.0
About 0.5
1.0-1.5
1.0-1.5 (hard)
About 0.75
(inertial)
Deployment
Reliability (percent)
Launch
Soft/hard
90
Soft/hard
80
90
95
85 80
Inflight
95
85
90
95
80 80
Warhead
95
95
95
95
95 95
Weapon system &/
80
65
75
85
65 60
Alert rate 1/
85-95
85-95
90-95
90-95
90-95 80-90
Force J SJ
70-75
55-60
70-75
75-80
55-60 50-55
Improvement -
-
--
70-75/IOC 60-65/IOC
Time to fire S
From normal readi- 1
oft Hard
-3 5-15
Soft Hard
1-3 30-45
3-5
0.5-3
+ 1 year + 1 year
0.5-2 J
ness condition h
From peak readi- 3
rs min
-5 3-5
hrs min
5-10 5-10
min
3-5
min
0.5-3
min
0.5-2 0.5-2
ness condition
Hold time
(At peak readiness) h
Refire time 2
min min
Many days
rs
-4 --
min min
About 1 hr
2-4 --
min
Unlimited
--
min
Unlimited
--
min min
Unlimited About 1 day
h
Configuration
Approximate gross 3
rs
Two stage
25,000
hrs
Two stage
165,000
Two stage
430,000
Two stage
100,000
Three stage
100,000
Lift-off
Weight (lbs)
Guidance I
S
l
nertial
torable
iquid
Radio
inertial
Nonstorable
liquid
Radio
inertial &
Inertial
Storable
liquid
Inertial
(poss radio
inertial)
Storable
liquid
Inertial
Solid
J The SS-6 had been phased out of the Soviet ICBM force by mid-1968; for characteristics of this system in previous years,
see Table 10 in 23rd Revision.
Based on the Savage parade missile and the KY-6 flight program.
These ICBMs have operational reentry vehicles (RV) of different weights and warheads with different maximum ranges;
the heavy RV goes to the shorter ranges and vice versa.
We project possible multiple reentry vehicles (MRV's) on the heavy payload version of the SS-9.
CEP (circular error probability) is the radius of a circle centered on the extended target, within which 50 percent of the
arriving missile warheads are expected to fall.
Weapon system reliability is the product of launch, inflight, and warhead reliability.
J A spread of reliabilities is given for Alert Rate and Force Reliability. The low side indicates day-to-day posture, and
the high side reflects a generated alert condition in time of international tension. It is estimated that storable liquid
propellant missiles could be held in a generated alert condition for about 2 weeks. Solid propellant missiles could be
held for about 30 days.
Force reliability is the percentage of the operational missile force that, in the absence of countermeasures, will suc-
cessfully detonate within 3.5 CEPs of the intended targets. It is the product of alert rate and weapon system reliabil-
i ty.
It probably would require about 30 minutes after arrival at the launch site for a mobile system to reach peak readiness;
thereafter the missile probably could fire in about 1 minute.
25
Approved ForeSEGJ/112/19: CIA-RDP78T04757A000300010027-7
 For PW?sNP I
Initial Operational Capability (IOC)
Maximum range (nm)
Guidance
CEP (nm)
Reentry vehicle weight (lbs)
Warhead weight (lbs)
Gross liftoff wt. (lbs)
Configuration
Propellant
Reliability (percent)
Launch
In-Flight
Warhead
Weapon system/
Alert rate
Force//
Time to fire
From normal readiness condition
From peak readiness condition
Hold time (Condition 1)
1,020
Inertial
1.25
3,300?500
2,200?500
88,000
Single stage
Storable liquid
Fixed
90
95
95
80
85-95
70-75
2,200
Inertial
1.0
3,500?500
2,800?400
About 200,000
Single stage
Storable liquid
Fixed
90
95
95
80
85-95
70-75
Soft Hard Soft Hard
1-3 hrs 5-15 min 1-3 hrs 5-15 min
3-5 min 3-5 min 3-5 min 3-5 min
Many Days Many Days
hours hours
2-4 hrs -- 2-4 hrs --
About 1,500
Inertial
0.5-1.0 (fixed)
1.0-1.5 (mobile)
About 1,000
About 750
About 35,000
Two stage
Solid
Fixed Mobile
85 80
80 80
95 95
65 60
90-95 80-90
55-60 50-55
70-75/IOC+ 60-65/IOC+
1 year 1 year
Hard Mobile
About 1 min 5/
About 1 min About 1 min
Unlimited About 1 day
Based on the use of the second and third stages of the SS-13.
Weapon system reliability is the product of launch, in-flight, and warhead reliability.
3/ A spread of reliabilities is given for alert rate and force reliability. The low side indicates a day-to-day posture, and
the high side reflects a generated alert condition in time of international tension. It is estimated that liquid propellant
missiles could be held in a generated alert condition for about two weeks. Solid propellant missiles probably could be
held for about 30 days.
Force reliability is the percentage of the operational missile force that, in the absence of countermeasures, will suc-
cessfully detonate within 3,5 CEPs of the intended targets. It is the product of alert rate and weapon system reliabil-
ity.
It probably would require about 30 minutes after arrival at the launch site for a mobile system to reach peak readiness;
thereafter the missile probably could fire in about 1 minute.
Approved For R?MEWT
25
25
25
 Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010027-7
TOP SECRET
Approved For Release 20U3Q2/19Stg- i3P78T04757A000300010027-7