EVALUATIONS OF SOVIET SURFACE-TO-SURFACE MISSILE DEPLOYMENT 20TH REVISION

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: NGA Records (Formerly NIMA)
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP78T04757A000300010019-6
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: T
• Document Page Count: 71
• Document Creation Date: December 28, 2016
• Document Release Date: September 2, 2003
• Sequence Number: 19
• Publication Date: September 1, 1965
• Content Type: REPORT

Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6
000
TOP SECRET
COPY V- 500
75 Pages ?~r.~....,..~ .,...,
Guided
EVALUATIONS OF SOVIET
SURFACE-TO-SURFACE
MISSILE DEPLOYMENT
20TH REVISION
A Report of the Deployment Working Group j
00
of the 00
00
Missile and Astronautics Intelligence Committee i
25X1 /'
DECLASS REVIEW by NIMA/DOD
TOP SECRET
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6
GROUP I
E vclodvd from aufomvlic
dawvycdirp and declesslllcarlon
 TOP SECRET
EVALUATIONS OF SOVIET
SURFACE-TO-SURFACE
MISSILE DEPLOYMENT
20TH REVISION
A Report of the Deployment Working Group
of the
Guided Missile and Astronautics Intelligence Committee
September 1965
TOP SECRET
 TOP SECRET
The Guided Missile and Astronautics Intelligence Com-
mittee (GMAIC) wishes to express its appreciation to the
National Photographic Interpretation Center for its assist-
ance in the editing, illustration, and publication of this
report.
TOP SECRET
Approved For Release 2003112119
- -
 1
1
I
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
I
IL
GUIDED MISSILE AND ASTRONAUTICS INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE
Photographic Interpreter support is provided by the Photo-
graphic Analysis Group, NPIC.
NOTE: All correspondence relative to this report should be directed to the
Chairman, Guided Missile and Astronautics Intelligence Committee (GMAIC).
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
3 f,&,Tc
IA-RDP78T04757A000300010019-6
I Approved For Releasaw
 TOP SECRET
This report, published bimonthly by the GMAIC Deployment
Working Group (DWG), provides a comprehensive, ready-reference
listing of all ICBM, IRBM, and MRBM deployment locations, types of
site configurations, photographic references, estimated construction
and operational status, and other evaluations by the DWG. These data
constitute the majority view of the DWG membership, and may not
correspond precisely to individual assessments by each member.
Additional data may be added to future revisions.
Dissemination of the report was previously limited to holders of
the DWG report, Soviet Surface-to-Surface Missile Deployment. Be-
cause the information contained herein is both supplemental and
self-sustaining, distribution will no longer be limited to holders of
the above report.
TOP SECRET
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6
 TOP SECRET
P age
Introduction ............................................. 1
Soviet ICBM Deployment ..................................... I
Soviet IRBM/MRBM Deployment ................................ 35
Table 1. Summary of Estimated Status of Identified ICBM, IRBM, and
MRBM Launchers at Deployed Complexes, .... 44
Table 2. Summary Evaluation of Soviet ICBM Deployment .............. 45
Table 3. Summary Evaluation of Launch Facilities,
Tyuratam Missile Test Center .......................... 49
Table 4. Summary Evaluation of Soviet IRBI4 Deployment .............. 50
Table 5. Summary Evaluation of Soviet MRBM Deployment ............. 52
Table 6. Summary Evaluation of Selected Launch Facilities,
Kapustin Yar Missile Test Center ........................ 59
Table 7. Summary Evaluation of Soviet Fixed Field Sites
(SSM Fixed Field Positions) ............................ 60
Table 8. Summary Evaluation of Soviet IRBM/MRBM Sites
Without Support Facilities .......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 64
Table 9. Composition of IRBM/MRBM Complexes ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
Table 10. Soviet ICBM, IRI3M, and MRBM Systems, Technical
Characteristics and Performance ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . 66
TOP SECRET
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78T04757A000300010019-6
 Approve
For sSE /19 : CIA-RDP78T04757A000300010019-6
Page
Figure 1. Deployment of Soviet ICBM Complexes .............. Facing 1
Figure 2. Typical Configurations of ICBM Launch Sites, and
Explanation of Types ................................ 3
Figure 3. Artist's Concept of Missile-Ready Buildings at Type II ICBM
Launch Sites ............................ ....... 6
Figure 4. Artist's Concept of Type IIIC Launch Silo Under Construction .... 8
Figure 5. Launch Site F(6), Zhangiz-Tobe ICBM Complex .............. 9
Figure 6. Launch Site F(6), Imeni Gastello ICBM Complex ............. 9
Figure 7. Type IIIC Launch Site With Control/ Electronic Facility......... 11
Figure 8. Artist's Concept of Launch Site A3(15), Tyuratam ............ 12
Figure 9. Artist's Concept of Launch Site B2(16), Tyuratam ............ 12
Figure 10. Artist's Concept of Launch Complex 1(14), Tyuratam .......... 13
Figure 11. Artist's Concept of Launch Site G7(18), Tyuratam ............ 14
Figure 12. Artist's Concept of Launch Site Kl/K2(13), Tyuratam ........... 14
Figure 13. Schematic Layout, Dombarovskiy ICBM Complex ........... ... 18
Figure 14. Schematic Layout, Imeni Gastello ICBM Complex ............ 19
Figure 15. Schematic Layout, Kartaly ICBM Complex ................. 20
Figure 16. Schematic Layout, Uzhur ICBM Complex .................. 21
Figure 17. Type IIID Launch Site With Support/Control Facility .......... 22
Figure 18. Artist's Concept of Type IIID Launch Silo Under Construction .... 23
Figure 19. Artist's Concept of Launch Site L1(21), Tyuratam ............ 25
Figure 20. Artist's Concept of Launch Site K3(20), Tyuratam ............ 25
Figure 21. Launch Site K3(20), Tyuratam .......................... 26
Figure 22. Artist's Concept of Launch Site G8/G9(19), Tyuratam .......... 27
Figure 23. Schematic Layout, Tyuratam Missile Test Center ............ 31
Figure 24. Deployment of Soviet IRBM/MRBM Complexes .............. 34
Figure 25. Typical Configurations of IRBM/MRBM Launch Sites,
With Associated Missile Systems ....................... 36
Figure 26. Locations of Singly Deployed Soviet IRBM/MRBM Launch Sites ... 38
Figure 27. Ugolnyy Launch Site, Ugolnyy MRBM Complex ............... 39
Figure 28. Kara Babau 2 Launch Site, Sary Ozek IRBM Complex .......... 42
Figure 29. Kara Babau 2 Launch Site, Sary Ozek IRBM Complex .......... 42
Figure 30. Schematic Layout, Kapustin Yar Missile Test Center .......... 43
Approved For s6@Q /19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6
25
25
 pprov
1
d For ~agteftJJ2/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6
II9., o
r--~
2 \ 7
'?o~uzl~n< S
.I". 6mQ ~~utii `.
n~T
Q w
< J Z
Q - W
Yo=
~O~J^\ YV 1~ \ 1
a~o
H ?n
TO \ ~~ ?
N y 0 ,
O j Y ` ~~ll'
~ O ~ U ~ rcW
o a ~'Qy
N ~ s
C 'l
Y O~ ~ ~ ~/yS
r
r
1
I
25
Approved Forfapaste1
 For s5LT" /19 : CIA-RDP78T04757A000300010019-6
INTRODUCTION
This report is the 20th Revision of Eval-
uations of Soviet Surface-to-Surface Missile
Deployment prepared by the Deployment Work-
ing Group (DWG) of the Guided Missile and Astro-
nautics Intelligence Committee (GMAIC). While
information in this and previous revisions is
self-sustaining, it serves to supplement the basic
DWG report Soviet Surface-to-Surface Missile
Deployment, which provides detailed information
on individual launch facilities of the Soviet
Strategic Rocket Forces. The basic report,
dated 1 January 1962
has been revised and updated on
a periodic basis. Further updating is accom-
plished in reports prepared and published for
GMAIC by the National Photographic Inter-
status of currently -operational strategic mis-
sile systems, the pace and extent of current
deployment, and development of follow-on pro-
grams. The results of this review and analysis
are included in this report.
SOVIET ICBM DEPLOYMENT
GENERAL
Significant trends in the Soviet ICBM de-
ployment program at this time include: (1)
continued deployment during If Type IIIC
single silos at the 6 previously identified com-
plexes, at about the same pace observed in
(2) continued deployment of Type IIID silos
at complexes previously associated with these
sites, but at what may be a reduced start rate
(possibly temporary) over that observed in
F1 and (3) a construction pace for both types
pretation Center.
I I and continuing analysis
of previous missions and other sources have
provided additional information on the Soviet
strategic missile deployment program. The
new data are reflected in Table 1* and in the
estimated operational status shown in Tables
2 through 6. Technical characteristics of Soviet
ICBM, IRBM, and MRBM systems currently
operational or under development are given in
Table 10. These characteristics have been re-
viewed and updated since publication of the 19th
Revision. Cutoff date for information contained
in this report is 20 August 1965.
We have completed out periodic in-depth
review and analysis of the entire Soviet ICBM,
IRBM, and MRBM deployment programs, in-
cluding test range facilities and missile firing
activity at Tyuratam and Kapustin Yar. We
have also examined evidence relating to the
*Table 1 has been u dated to include single-silo ICBM
sites detected on
e additional data are
not reflected in the totals given in text, or in Table 2.
of single silos somewhat slower than we had
previously estimated.
Other significant developments in deploy-
ment-related activities of the Soviet Strategic
Rocket Forces include continued flight testing
of a probable new liquid-propellant ICBM; a
flight test of the SS-9 missile, probably from
a single silo at Tyuratam to the Pacific Im-
pact Area; and the launch of a space vehicle
from Launch Site G3/G4 at Tyuratam.
CURRENT DEPLOYMENT
The number of identified ICBM complexes
remains at 25. See Figure 1 for location of
deployed ICBM complexes. These complexes
now contain a total of 378 confirmed and pro-
bable launchers in various stages of construc-
tion, an increase of 9 over the number reported
in our 19th Revision. Of these 378 launchers,
150 are soft and 228 are hard. Included in the
hard launchers are 150 single silos. Inaddition,
we are carrying 15 single-silo sites in the
possible category. An additional 49 launchers
25
25
25
25
25
Approved For s5FejW',2
 25X1
For I VI'ssee
at Tyuratam, including 28 silos, complete the
total force identified to date.
Of the 378 confirmed and probable launchers
in various stages of construction, 224 are esti-
mated to be operational, including 78 in a
hard configuration. In addition, we believe that
34 of the 49 launchers at Tyuratam are oper-
ational; although all are not normally main-
tained in an alert status, they could be used
operationally. The ICBM sites have been
designated by type, as shown and explained in
Figure 2.
Evaluation of all evidence received since
our last revision has resulted in the following
additions at the complexes indicated:
DOMBAROVSKIY, Launch Site G (11),
Probable Launch Sites H (10), I (8),
and J (9), and Possible Launch Site K
(12), Type IIIC, under construction
IMENI GASTELLO, Launch Site K (11),
Type IIIC, under construction
KARTALY, Launch Site K(11) and
Possible Launch Sites L and M, Type
IIIC, under construction
UZHUR, Launch Sites 0 (15), P (16),
and Q (17), Type IIIC, under con-
struction.
older ICBM complexes reveals no significant
change in status at any of the deployed sites
associated with the first- and second-gener-
ation missile systems. In view of the extensive
photographic coverage of the 18 older com-
plexes and Soviet rail system over an extended
period of time, we are virtually certain that
no additional complexes or launch sites for
Approved For F11
bIPTE C l
first- and second-generation systems remain
undetected.
SS-6 Sites
Continuing photographic coverage of the 4
SS-6 launchers at Plesetsk indicates that this
system is still operational. There is no evi-
dence of construction activity or other indi-
cators which we can relate to retrofit of the
Plesetsk launchers for a folow-on system.
We cannot identify any ICBM system cur-
rently operational or under test which might be
compatible with SS-6 launch facilities. If
retrofit were intended for the launchers, we
would expect to see such retrofit preceded by
firing of the new system from SS-6 facilities
at Tyuratam. No such firings have been de-
tected. We expect, however, that the SS-6
ICBM system will be phased out of the inventory
within the next few years.
SS-1 Sites
Total deployment of site configurations
identified with the SS-7 missile system con-
sists of 64 soft sites (128 launchers) and 23
hard sites (69 silos) distributed among 15
complexes. All are operational.
We are still unable to determine with a
high degree of confidence whether the SS-7
or SS-9 missile system is deployed in the later
group of 9 Type IIIA hard sites (see 17th
Revision). We continue to believe that the SS-9
is the most likely possibility.
In our 17th Revision we discussed in de-
tail the possibity that SS-7 sites could be
retrofitted to accommodate the SS-9 ICBM.
This analysis is still valid. We see no evi-
dence that such a program is underway, nor do
we expect to see it begun at an early date.
We base this judgment on the continued utility
of the SS-7 system against many US targets,
the relatively large number of these missiles
estimated to be in the inventory, and the appar-
r
t
 Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6
 Approv4
d For R
Tap sSQQ1
ent intent of the Soviets to accomplish a sig-
nificant increase in the total number of oper-
ational launchers.
SS-8 Sites
The SS-8 missile system remains deployed
in 7 soft (14 launchers) and 3 hard sites (9
silos) at 4 complexes in the USSR. These
sites are all operational.
We can detect no activity at deployed SS-8
sites indicative of retrofit with a newer system.
As is the case for the SS-6, we would expect
retrofit of SS-8 test facilities and firings of
the new system from prototype launchers at
Tyuratam to precede changes at deployed sites.
To date, no firings of missiles other than the
SS-8 have been detected from Launch Sites E
(6) and F (7) at the test center.
We continue to believe that SS-8 missiles
at deployed sites may be phased out during the
next several years, because maintenance of the
few sites deployed will become less desirable
as more advanced missile systems become
operational.
Refire Capability
There is good evidence that Soviet oper-
ational concepts for strategic missile forces
include a refire capability from soft sites, in-
cluding ICBM sites. There is no evidence of an
intent or capability to refire from hard sites
and we do not believe that such a capability
evidence dating back to 1959 establish that
refire from soft MRBM sites was both in-
tended as an operational concept and practiced
in exercises, although no evidence of live
firings of refire missiles is available. There
is little doubt that soft ICBM sites were de-
signed to have a refire capability. The num-
ber and size of missile-ready buildings at de-
ployed sites provide evidence of such an in-
tent, probably adopted on the premise that site
locations would remain hidden from observa-
tion. Recent evidence tends to substantiate that
the refire concept is still valid. During
additional missile-ready buildings were a e
to 5 SS-7 soft sites that had been operational
for periods ranging from a few months to 2
years. Additionally, recent cov-
erage of a missile exercise underway at the
Itatka Complex (see 19th Revision) showed
3 possible missiles at 1 launch site.
We are unable, however, to determine the
actual number of missiles available for refire
from soft ICBM sites, since no direct evidence
is available. Our analysis has also been tem-
pered by the belief that current US first-strike
and retaliatory capabilities would limit or pre-
clude Soviet refire from a significant number
of soft sites. We also believe that the refire
capability is not uniform throughout the Soviet
ICBM force. This judgment is based on the
fact that the number, size, and configuration
of missile-ready buildings at individual sites
vary considerably. The number ofreadybuild-
ings varies from 1 to 3 at SS-7 soft sites, and
SS-8 soft sites each have 2 buildings. SS-7
sites have 3 different sizes of ready buildings,
but the SS-8 sites have only 1 building (Fig-
ure 3).
A rough estimate of the maximum capability
for refire can be obtained by an analysis of the
capacity of the missile-ready buildings at each
site, assuming reasonable space requirements
for maintenance and checkout as well as storage
of ready missiles. This analysis indicated that
the number of ready missiles in these buildings
could total as many as 400 ICBMs for the 146
soft launchers currently operational.
Some gross limitations as to the magnitude
of the total number of missiles available can be
deduced from evidence of missile production,
although such evidence is inconclusive. This
evidence, based on an analysis of floor space
25
25
25
25
Approved For RsSF 12
 25X1 Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6
 4
1
1
A
For TV 91 - -
at known ICBM production plants and so-called
"batch testing" at Tyuratam, indicates that about
2 missiles are available for each SS-6, SS-7,
and SS-8 soft launcher. These figures are in
addition to a single missile for each operational
hard launcher.
These analyses indicate that the missiles
available to the currently operational force of
224 launchers (including 78 silos) for initial
salvo, refire, and maintenance spaces may
range from a low of about 375 to a high of as
many as 475. It is believed likely that some
sites might have a multiple refire capability
while others have none. In any event, there
is little doubt that the Soviets have available
to their currently operational ICBM force the
number of missiles necessary to meet oper-
ational requirements.
TYPE IIIC SITES*
General
Confirmed Type IIIC single-silo site de-
ployment continues to be limited to the com-
plexes at Aleysk, Dombarovskiy, Imeni Gastello,
Kartaly, Uzhur, and Zhangiz-Tobe. These com-
plexes contain a total of 60 confirmed andprob-
able sites, in construction stages ranging from
early to mid. In addition, recently initiated
construction at Kartaly suggests the start of
another 3 sites and new activity at Dombarovskiy
indicates another possible site under construc-
tion. The launch sites at each complex are
separated by distances ranging from 3 to 6
miles.
Total sites at the 6 complexes range
from a low of 6 at Aleysk and Zhangiz-Tobe
to a high of 17 at Uzhur. Analysis of construc-
tion activity at each of the complexes indi-
cates that planned deployment -- at least in
*See Table 1. Detection of 4 additional Type IIIC sites at
the Zhangiz-Tobe Complex on
is not re-
flected in text, or in fable .
Approved For1aff?.'1
terms of pace of site activation--is not
the same for all 6 complexes. Except for
Dombarovskiy, activation of new sites has
been progressing at a fairly even pace at
those complexes containing more than 6
sites. At Aleysk, however, no new site
construction has been identified since
until some 6 months after
iniation of construction activity at the fifth
site.
The size of the complex support facility at
Type IIIC complexes indicates that all will
contain more than 6 sites. No reliable esti-
mate can be made of the maximum number of
sites to be deployed at any one, or all, of
the complexes. It does appear, ?however, that
all the complexes may not be programmed for
the same number of sites.
Site Composition and Configuration
Type IIIC launch areas consist of a single
silo and a relatively limited site support fa-
cility. In previous revisions we have pointed
out the similarity of the Type IIIC silo to
individual silos accommodating the SS-7 (and
possibly the SS-9) at Type IIIA sites. Con-
tinuing analysis supports this belief. Men-
surations of Type IIIC inner silo diameters
now average abouti the same as
for Type IIIA sites. Silo doors observed at
Tyuratam Launch Sites A3 (15), B2 (16), and
I (14), prototypes for Type IIIC field deploy-
ment, appear identical to those at Launch
Complex D and deployed second-generation
counterparts.
The most advanced Type IIIC sites in the
field are still in a midstage after 17 to 18
months of construction. At most sites, ramps
lead onto the silo structure (Figure 4). How-
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
 1 For I sOl~ 19:CIA-RDP78T04757A000300010019-6 I
1
ever, the most recent coverage of Uzhur indi-
cates that backfilling may have begun at some of
the sites at this complex.
In our 17th Revision, we provided a de-
tailed description of construction procedures
at Type IIIC sites. Subsequent ov-
erage provides further details. Construction
procedures vary slightly at each site, probably
due to geological or environmental conditions,
but generally folow a basic pattern. Usually
a security fence is erected around the pro-
posed site, site support buildings are erected,
and earth moving equipment begins surface
grading. Next an excavation 20 to 30 feet
deep is apparent, with 1 or 2 earthen ramps pro-
viding access into the excavation. At this
time the spoil from the excavation is usually
mounded in a large rectangular pattern on
one side of the excavation; additional spoil is
piled in a square mound, aligned with the silo
excavation and the rectangle, but on the opposite
side of the excavation. This rectangle and square
do not appear at all Type IIIC sites in the field
or at Tyuratam. They probably are constructed
(or in some instances cut) to provide level access
to the silo.
The silo excavation is usually dug with
sheer walls, although at least 2 of the sites
have terraced sides, probably due to soil con-
siderations. Once the desired depth is reached,
the silo coring begins. The time required to
excavate and core at individual sites appears
to vary widely. At Imeni Gastello Launch Site
H (9), it took about 3 months; at Zhangiz-Tobe
Launch Site F (6), 6 months were required. Con-
crete is poured into the silo coring, forming
a cylindrical silo with an inside diameter of
approximately I freet and an outside diam-
eter of about This cylindrical silo
is built up to the bottom of the excavation,
and a beveled ring with an interior diameter
ix
25X
1
I
25X
Approved For ReS*"~
I
 X~
1
For mfp"tl
25
25
t
t
"LED RING
'%1'0 1# T DI
25
Approved For TS"
25
 AppruveL1
For RTbfpS 1VVf/
9: CIA-RDP78T04757A000300010019-6
of approximately and an overall diam-
eter of about 50 feet is fitted onto the top of
the silo core. At Zhangiz-Tobe Launch Site
F (6), on this
beveled ring can be seen being fabricated in
3 segments just outside the excavation (Fig-
ure 5); a beveled "lip" in the center of the base
of the square silo excavation can be seen. At
Imeni Gastello Launch Site F (6), on the same
mission, a similar beveled ring is in place and
2 of the 3 joints can be defined (Figure 6);
at this same site the walls of the square silo
structure, which measures about 65 feet on
a side, are slightly above the base of the ex-
cavation.
In the next visible step, a concrete slab
for the base of the silo structure is poured
in the squared-off bottom of the excavation,
and the vertical walls of the silo structure are
begun. A loop road is usually apparent at
this stage, which averages 9 to 11 months after
initiation of construction. The square form of the
silo structure then takes shape and compart-
mentalization within the structure is evident.
At this point -- some 12 to 14 months from
start -- 1 or 2 construction ramps are in place
from ground level to the top of the silo structure.
The walls of the silo structure are then brought
to their predetermined height, and the silo
structure "capped". At this point, about 17
to 18 months have elapsed from start. Also
apparent at this time, when exposed to iso-
density techniques, are openings on opposite
sides of the silo, probably for venting exhaust
during launch from within the silo. At 4 of
the complexes, Imeni Gastello, Kartaly, Uzhur,
and Zhangiz-Tobe, cylindrical or convex linear
objects, appear on the rectangular mounds ad-
jacent to the silos. The exact nature of these
objects -- which are similar, if not identical,
to those observed at Type IIIA sites -- cannot
be determined precisely, but they are probably
Approved For RTb r q5 M
silo liners fabricated on site. Their appearance
at these sites varies time-wise throughout the
mid- construction stage.
A hardened control facility and an L-shaped
electronic facility are under construction at
only 1 launch site, as indicated, in each of the
following complexes: Aleysk Launch Site C (3),
Dombarovskiy Launch Site B(3), Imeni Gastello
Launch S:.te D(4), Kartaly Launch Site A (1),
Uzhur Launch Site B(2), and Zhangiz-Tobe
Launch Site A (1). The control facility is
located at the apex of the "L", and consists
of a large compartmented building (probably
the primary control building) and a smaller
building (probably for equipment). Both build-
ings are in an excavation and will almost cer-
tainly be earth mounded when completed. The
segments of the "L" are approximately 1,300
to 1,350 feet long. There is good evidence that
each facility will contain several antenna silos,
since these are visible at similar facilities
associated with the prototype sites at Tyuratam.
A typical control/electronic facility is shown
in Figure 7.
Tyuratam Prototypes
We believe that the launch group formed by
Launch Sites A3 (15), B2 (16), and I (14) at
Tyuratam is almost certainly the prototype for
deployed Type IIIC sites. It is also possible
that the launch group formed by Launch
Sites G7 (18) and K/K2 (13) is for the
same missile system, although the signature
of this group differs somewhat from the other
group, and from deployed sites.
Launch Sites A3 (15), B2 (16), and I 14)
appeared complete when last observed on
I photography, although equipment instal-
lation anc checkout apparently was still under-
way and the associated control building at
Launch Site I (14) had not yet been earth mounded.
We believe that these sites are now operational
I
t
1
 ForfapaSEMff
CONTROL
BUILDING
' \
L-SHAPED
ELECTRONIC
FACILITY
Road
-f Fence
- - - - Cable ditching
. Surface mound
,' Excavation
o Building under
construction
D
25
25
25
Approved For s3 Rl2~
UNIDENTIFIED
OBJECT
LAUNCH SILO
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
AMP \
 Approved F
r F psS fMyl
1
Approved For T&SSR"ti
 Approve
For `TdWR"3
(Figures 8, 9, and 10). Each site contains what
appears to be an exact replica of an individual
Type ILIA silo. Only Launch Site I (14) has
a control and electronic facility, and cabling is
visible from it to the other 2 sites, indicating
that control of all 3 sites will be exercised
from a common source.
The silos at Launch Sites G7 (18) and
K1/K2 (13) appear identical to those at Launch
Sites A3 (15), B2 (16), and 1 (14), although they
have not yet progressed beyond a midstageof
construction (Figures 11 and 12). Both sites
are connected by cabling, but only Launch Site
G7 (18) has a control and electronic facility
under construction. The major difference
between the 2 groups is that one consists of 3
separate sites whereas the other contains only
2 sites; Launch Site K/K2 (13) is, in reality,
a single site composed of 2 launch silos approx-
imately 1,100 feet apart and contained within
the same security fencing.
Approved For Is6SMIT2~
Deployment Pattern and Operational Control
Early assessment of Type IIIC site deploy-
ment indicated a pattern of site layout in groups
of 3, (i.e., 1 launch control center for 3 sites).
This judgment was based primarily on the
prototype grouping at Tyuratam and the fact
that we have been unable to identify individual
control facilities at each site. To date, this
assessment has not been borne out. We have
identified a control facility, at 1 of the first
6 sites at each complex, but have not yet ob-
served any firm evidence of a second. There
is good evidence that the sites within a com-
plex will be connected by an extensive cable
network, and we continue to believe that a re-
dundant control scheme will be utilized. Further
coverage will be required before we can define
it more accurately.
To date, only one L-shaped electronic
facility has been identified at each complex.
This fact raises some doubt as to the purpose
25
25
25
 d For F TASSOM"i
Approved For TopaE PT 3
D
 Approve
For - ps5 eRZ l21
of this facility. If it is to serve both a launch
control and guidance function, we would expect
additional "Ls" to appear at each complex. This
redundancy probably would be required since the
electronic portion appears to be softer than the
launch silos and control bunker. Another
purpose of the L-shaped electronic facility may
be to determine, in a combat situation, the
success of missiles in attaining the desired tar-
get trajectories. Such a system would permit
the Soviets to re-target or follow up with al-
ternate or backup missiles based on the assess-
ment of the probable CEPs achieved. The
system would not only assess the probably de-
struction of primary objectives, but would en-
hance maximum effective utilization of the
total force by preventing wasteful overkill.
This is an important consideration for the Soviets
because of the apparent missile gap between US
and Soviet forces.
Construction Timing
Construction of Type IIIC sites at deployed
complexes continues to progress more slowly
than would be expected in view of the probable
availability of SS-9 missiles, and the similarity
between this type of single silo and one type of
silo at the earlier SS-7 hard sites. The last
group of Type IIIA sites was constructed in
17 to 20 months. The average construction time
for all Type IIIA sites was 22 to 24 months.
Additionally, the "brick and mortar" phase of
construction at Launch Sites A3 (15), B2 (16),
and 1 (14), at Tyuratam was completed in
about 16 to 18 months.
coverage since our last revision
indicates that the "brick and mortar" phase of
construction at some deployed sites may take
somewhat longer than the 18 to 21 months we
previously estimated; others may fall within
this time frame. We currently believe that the
"brick and mortar" phase of construction at those
sites now under construction in the field will
require some 18 to 24 months to complete. With
additional time allowed for installation and
checkout of equipment, we believe that individual
sites will require 21 to 27 months to reach
operational status. The estimated operational
dates for these sites, contained in Table 2, have
been modified to assess each site individually
(rather than in groups of 3) on the basis of an
average 24-month construction period.
Logistic Support
Logistic support facilities at the 6 com-
plexes associated with Type IIIC site deployment
consist of a complex support facility, a rail-to-
road transfer point, and relatively limited
individual site support facilities. The following
information updates and supplements the more
detailed description of these facilities contained
in our 17th Revision.
The complex support facilities at all 6
complexes continue to grow in size. They
apparently are functionally similar to the faci-
lities at the 18 older ICBM complexes, but
appear to be somewhat smaller.
Imeni Gastello, Uzhur, and Zhangiz-Tobe,
have similar complex support facilities. Each
facility is located on the edge of town and is
served by a direct rail spur; this spur divides
into 3 branches as it enters the facility. Build-
ings at the 3 installations now number 19, 24,
and 30, respectively. Approximately 60 per
cent of these structures appear to be for storage,
and the remainder includes shops, sheds, and
barracks. Each installation has a probable
transshipment shed located along 1 of the rail
spurs. The roofs of these sheds are arched
and appear to be supported by columns. Each
of the complex support facilities has a motor
pool and a large area for open storage.
The complex support facilities at Aleysk,
Dombarovskiy and Kartaly are similar to those
at the other 3 complexes, but are divided into
3 separately fenced areas, each served by rail
Approved For "s$F12,
25
25
 d For 12-1
I Vr Id.Kf l l
spurs. Aleysk has the largest number of build-
ings, 51, followed by Kartaly with 49, and
Dombarovskiy with 34. As at the other 3 com-
plexes, about 60 percent of the structures appear
to be for storage, and the remainder for shops,
sheds, and housing. The central area in each
of these 3 facilities consists of about 12 shop
and storage buildings, a motor pool., an open
storage area, a probable transshipment shed
and a large U-shaped building. The rail spur
serving this portion of the facility divides into
3 or 4 deadend spurs. The second fenced area,
a military or construction camp, is rail served
and consists of 14 barracks-type buildings, a
messhall , 6 storage buildings, 2 or 3 shop
buildings, and an additional 6 buildings under
construction. The third area is rail served and
appears to be a permanent barracks and housing
camp. It consists of 3 or 4 multistory barracks
with 2 or 3 more under construction), 8 or 9
storage buildings, 2 or 3 shop-type buildings,
and a large motor pool.
Site support facilities associated with the
individual launch areas at all 6 complexes are
relatively small. They are always located
outside the launch site security fence at dis-
tances of up to 1 mile. The individual site
support facilities at 5 of these complexes
contain 2 to 4 large rectangular buildings of
equal size, and normally parallel to each other.
These appear to be barracks-type buildings.
Several smaller structures are located within
the facility. At Imeni Gastello, there are 6 to 8
smal.~ r buildings instead of the larger rec-
ta1guiar type.
In summary, an analysis of the complex
and site support facilities at the Type IIIC
complexes indicates that the nature and scope
of those facilities cannot be used to determine
either the missile system to be employed or the
number of launch sites to be supported.
Approved For Tur
Associated Missile Systems
We are virtually certain that some, if not
all, of the Type IIIC silos under construction
at deployed complexes are for the SS-9 missile
system. This judgment is based on an analysis
of silo size and configuration, and concurrency of
flight test programs with site construction. In
It is also possible that the SS-10 missile
system is compatible with the Type IIIC silo.
However this system has not been fired since
I and we suspect that the program
may have been canceled. If firings of the SS-
10 missile are resumed, it is possible that this
system also will be deployed in Type IIIC sites.
Development at Deployed Type IIIC Complexes
ALEYSK COMPLEX
Aleysk has not been covered by
photography since our last revision.
confirmed, 3 probable, and 1 possible new
Type IIIC sites in an early stage of construc-
tion at the Dombarovskiy Complex. These
launch sites have been designated G (11),
H (10), I (81), J (9), and K (12).
Launch Site G (11), located approximately
12 nm north of the complex support facility,
I It consists of a shallow square excavation
and several small buildings. Probable Launch
Sites H (10) and 1 (8), located 11 nm northwest
and 3 nm east of the complex support facility,
respectively, can be negated, respectively, on
and Possible Launch
I
 Site K (12) on
Approved
For Ipa JEMPT
No significant changes are visible at the
complex support facility and Launch Site E (17).
A linear object is apparent on the rectangular
mounds at Launch Sites A (4), B (3), and C (2).
These sites remain in a midstage of construc-
tion. Launch Site F (7) can be identified only,
and Launch Site D (1) is cloud covered. Im-
proved roads are under construction throughout
the complex. A schematic layout of the
Dombarovskiy Complex is shown in Figure 13.
IMENI GASTELLO COMPLEX
Highlight of partial
Gastello Complex on
coverage of the Imeni
launch site, designated Launch Site K (11), in
an early stage of construction. This site is
located approximately 20 nm southwest of the
complex support facility. It is first visible on
this mission and can be negated on
No significant changes were observed at
Launch Sites A (1), B (2), C (3), and G (7). The
complex support facility and Launch Sites D (4),
E (5), F (6), H (8), 1 (9), and J (10) were cloud
covered. A schematic layout of this complex
is shown in Figure 14.
KARTALY COMPLEX
The Kartaly Complex was partially covered
by
adjacent to the silos. No significant activity
can be identified at the remaining sites. A
schematic layout of the complex is shown in
Figure 15.
The Uzhur Complex was covered by both
missions and this coverage was high-
lighted by the discovery of 3 new Type IIIC
sites, all in an early stage of construction.
Launch Sites 0 (15) and P (16) are first visible
on and both are negated on
Launch Sites A through F (1-6), H (8), and
K (11) are in a midstage of construction;
backfilling may have begun at some of these sites.
Launch Sites G (7), I (9), J (10), and L through
N (12-14) are in an early stage. Construction
continues at the L 'shaped electronic facility at
Launch Site B (2). Cable trenches le ad from the
vicinity of this site to Launch Sites A (1), C (3),
D (4), and E (5); cable scars are also visible
between Launch Sites A (1) and F (6), D (4) and
C (3), D (4) and E (5), and from C (3) toward
G (7) and D (4) toward 1 (9).
A road now leads from the rail-to-road
transfer point northward to an improved road
running east and west through the complex.
Improved roads lead from this main road to
Launch Sites A (1), B (2), C (3), D (4), F (6),
and H (8). An improved road also leads from
Launch Site E (5) toward the rail-to-road trans-
fer point. Construction continues at the transfer
point and the complex support facility. A
schematic layout of the Uzhur Complex is shown
in Figure 16.
ZHANGIZ-TOBE COMPLEX
The Zhangiz-Tobe Complex has not been
The earlier mission revealed 3 newly identified
areas of activity. One, a confirmed Type IIIC
launch site in an early construction stage, is
designated Launch Site K (11). It can be negated
and is first
The other
2 sites, designated Possible Launch Sites L and
M, are negated on
and first seen on
Probable fabrication of silo liners is ap-
parent at Launch Sites A (1) and D (4), where
linear objects are visible on the rectangles
covered by photography since our last
revision.
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
Approved For I s?[RF12~
 25X1 Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6
Next 3 Page(s) In Document Exempt
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6
 Approve
TYPE IIID SITES*
General
For F iede- sg~2paw 19 : CIA-RDP78T04757A000300010019-6
We have identified a total of about 100 con-
firmed, probable and possible Type IIID single-
silo launch sites, located at the Tatishchevo
Complex and 4 of the older ICBM complexes
(Drovyanaya, Gladkaya, Olovyannaya and Perm).
The latter 4 complexes previously were asso-
ciated only with the SS-7 missile system.
Earliest construction of the Type IIID site
configuration began at the Tatishchevo Complex
about
initiated at
Gladkaya
F
Additional deployment was
in Olovyannaya and
and at Drovyanaya about
*See Table 1. Detection of 11 additional Type IIID sites
at the Olovyannaya Complex and 3 additional sites at
the Tatishchevo Complex on
is not ref ec-
ted in text, or in Table .
Road
Fence
- - - Cable ditching
-D Excavation
Approved For F br SJUQ tl 21
Deployment Pattern and Operational Control
We continue to believe that Type IIID single
silos will be deployed in operational groups of
10, based on i_ coverage of Launch
Groups D (4-13) and E (14-23) at Olovyannaya,
A (1-11) at Tatishchevo, G (7-18) at Drovyanaya,
and Launch Group L (21-30) at Tyuratam. At
each of these launch groups, the support/control
facility and 1 launch silo are in the center of a
generally circular configuration, with the re-
maining launch sites at distances ranging from
2.5 to 4 nautical miles. At 4 of the 5 groups the
sites are interconnected by an extensive network
of cabling.. No site support facility can be
identified at any of the 9 outlying launch sites.
The center sites contain an L-shaped elec-
tronic facility similar, but not identical, to
those at Type IIIC launch complexes (Figure 17).
The length of 1 segment of these electronic
facilities averages about 1,325 feet. It appears
t
t
t
1
 Approve
For f0pa V
that there will be hardened antenna positions at
the extremities of the segments of the L and at
the vertex. The control facility, located in an
excavation at the vertex of the L, consists of 2
control/equipment buildings roughly equal in
size. They appear to be connected by an under-
ground passageway. The control facility, when
completed, will almost certainly be earth
mounded.
We are currently carrying some 14 launch
groups at the 5 complexes associated with Type
IIID site deployment. In many cases, however,
groupings of sites are close together and we
are unable to identify the specific sites as-
sociated with each group. We probably will be
able to identify these groups only after inter-
site cabling is evident. Determination of the
number of launch groups in these instances is
based on identification of central control/support
facilities, total numbers of sites identified, and
their geographic layout. Of the 14 launch
groups, there are 4 each at the Olovyannaya and
Tatishchevo Complexes, and 3 complexes each
have 2 groups.
There is no evidence, as yet, that launch
groups within a complex will be inter-connected,
but we believe that this will be accomplished to
provide maximum flexibility in the event that 1
control center is rendered inoperative.
Site Composition and Configuration
Individual launch sites, other than the 1
containing the support/control facility, are
simple and austere. Each site contains a dough-
nut-shaped silo structure approximately
in diameter (Figure 18); the inner diameter of
the silo is about 15 feet. A small building is
located near the silo. At some sites a small
structure has also been observed near the
appendage on the side of the silo. This structure,
which may contain equipment, apparently is
covered by backfilling.
Approved For FTsgNR 2
25
25
25
25
 or Rfb sj fj/
Coring for the silo is accomplished after the
digging of a small irregular excavation. The
silo is then constructed in the coring. During
this time, the small building is constructed near
the silo and grading for the level access is
accomplished. The network of cables between
sites is also begun during this period. By the
time the silo reaches ground level, the silo
access has been completed except for the
immediate area around the silo. This area
remains open for a period of 2 to 6 months.
Sometime during backfill, an environmental
cover approximatelyl s placed
over the silo opening. The most advanced silos
at deployed launch groups have reached a point
where backfill is complete and the sites have a
clean appearance. Silo doors have riot yet been
identified, however.
Tyuratam Prototypes
We believe that the prototype for deployed
Type IIID sites is Launch Group L (21-30) at
Tyuratam, a 10-site configuration. In addition,
Launch Sites K3 (20) and G8/G9 (19) appear to
have similar silos. However, significant differ-
ences in overall site configuration at G8/G9
suggest that 2 different missile systems may
be planned.
Launch
structed in about 6 months during the spring and
summer In the fall, however, the apex
of the L was reexcavated and 2 buildings added.
Additional excavating was also visible at this
time in the vicinity of the silo, although the
nature of this activity has never been established.
Both of these areas have again been backfilled
(Figure 21). Although we can neither confirm
nor deny the presence of a silo door on existing
photography, the remainder of the site appears
complete and we estimate that it is operational.
It is also possible that Launch Site G8/G9
(19) at Tyuratam may employ the same missile
system. This 2-silo site, begun early in
is currently operational (Figure 22). The silos,
some 385 feet apart, appear to be similar to
other Type IIID silos at the canter and at
deployed sites. The site configuration differs
from the others, however, and there is no
L-shaped electronic facility which can be speci-
fically associated with these silos. This site
can be associated closely with Launch Site
G5/G6 (12; at Tyuratam, a soft site also lacking
an L-shaped electronic facility.
Construction Timing
It appears that Type IIID sites will be
deployed in groups of 10, and we estimate
that they will become operational in groups,
although it is possible that fewer than 10 silos
could have a somewhat earlier operational
and is progressing towardcom-
pletion at a rapid rate. It is currently in a late
construction stage and, if work progresses at
the pace observed to date, the group should be
operational by late summer or early fal~
The center site, Launch Site L1 (21), is similar,
if not identical, to Launch Site K3 (20), except
that the electronic facility at L1 is oriented
north toward the US, while that at K3 is
oriented downrange toward Kamchatka (Figures
19 and 20).
Launch Site K3 (20), containing 1 launch silo
and a control and electronic facility, was con-
Approved For Rr pseSF "~
capability.
It is apparent from continued
coverage of Type IIID launch groups at deployed
complexes that the pace of construction is
deliberate and unhurried. While at Tyuratam
it appears that Launch Group L (21-30) will
be completed in a year or less, some 4 launch
groups in the field have been underway about
14 to 16 months, and only 2 of these are currently
in a late stage. Our previous estimate that
approximately 1 year is required for the "brick
 For SSR"t
I
25
25
25
Approved For sgeeje'r2,
 Approve
GRADED/SURFACED
MOUND
19: CIA-RDP78TO4757AO00300010019-6
I rc)DDICLt
ANTENNA
SILO,
CONTROL/
EQUIPMENT
BUILDING
For R psStl,l(E1f
L-SHAPED
ELECTRONIC
FACILITY
BURIED
POSSIBLE STRUCTURE
Surfaced road
Road
Fence
Closed ditch
Earth-mounded building
Tower
? Probable wave guide/
cable-tray footings
? Launch silo
1000
Approved For sP.SFO l2~
 For.D~Iaa
UF-It t l
25
25
Approved For FIIWs3ER"
25
 For RTe}eP tz4 Y
and mortar" phase of silo construction is still
a median figure, with a range of 10 to 15
months observed at individual sites. No silo
doors have been identified as yet, however,
and several silos have remained unchanged
externally since early= It appears, there-
fore, that installation and checkout of equipment
at these sites has been delayed or is taking
longer than the 6 months we previously esti-
mated. It now appears that it will take from
21 to 24 months for each launch group to reach
an operational status. Estimated operational
dates for the 14 launch groups identified to
date are contained in Table 2, and are based
on a total construction time of 21 months for
each group, the earliest we believe that they
will be operational.
Logistic Support
In our 17th Revision we provided a detailed
description of logistic facilities supporting Type
IIID site deployment. The following information
updates and supplements this information.
The complex support facility at Tatishchevo
is still under construction at the terminus of the
rail spur. It appears to be somewhat smaller
than similar facilities at Type IIIC complexes,
but contains the same functional components.
Tatishchevo is the only complex where the
road network serving the Type HID launch
sites has been improved to any degree. The
improved road which runs through Launch
Group A (1-11) is reminiscent of the complex
main road at the older ICBM complexes; the
site access roads branch off this road.
Deployment of Type IIID launch groups at
the 4 older complexes has resulted in a sig-
nificant buildup in support facilities since
The bulk of the new construction is
barracks-type buildings. At Drovyanaya, a
total of about 125 buildings has now been added
to the complex support facility, and the housing
area to the north. About 40 buildings support
Approved For R?b e T
Type IIID deployment at Perm, and 30 to 35
buildings have been added to existing facilities
at Olovyannaya and Gladkaya.
As previously reported, only 1 support
facility has been identified at each launch group.
It is colocated with the launch site containing
the control/support facility. There is no
evidence of on-site support facilities at the
other launch sites in each group.
A significant buildup of facilities has
been observed at rail-to-road transfer points
supporting Type IIID site deployment. These
facilities include very large rectangular build-
ings, large semiburied tanks, arch -roofed build-
ing(s), a large clerestory building, large rail-
through building(s), and additional rail spurs.
All of the transfer points are similar except
that at Perm. The buildup there is not yet as
extensive as at the other complexes.
Associated Missile Systems
Two missiles are candidates for deployment
in Type IIID silos. The first is a probable new
2-stage liquid-propellant missile, designated
TT-2, which has been flight tested from
Tyuratam to Kamchatka on at least 5 occasions
since Flim Flam backtracks
indicate that the missile is being fired from
Launch Complex G -- possibly from Launch
Site G5/G6 (12), although Launch Site G1/G2 (7)
cannot be eliminated. The present firing rate
of more than 1 per month can be compared to
the early test phase of the SS-7 program. In
that program the rate increased significantly
after the first 10 firings. Should a comparable
increase occur in TT-2 testing, and if the pro-
gram is successful, initial operational capability
could be reached as early as
when the first Type IIID silos also could be
completed.
The second candidate, the 3-stage solid-
propellant missile (SAVAGE) displayed in the
9 May 1965 Moscow parade, has not been flight
t
t
 We- q
n6{t2
For F
tur
tested, at least in its full configuration. Initial
operational capability for this missile system
could be reached in late 1966 or early
1967,
if intensive 3-stage testing commences
immediate future.
in the
Development at Deployed Type 1110 Complexes
DROVYANAYA COMPLEX
Launch Groups G (7-18) and H (16-26) were
both covered by
Construction continues at Launch Group G (7-18),
where all of the sites except Launch Sites
G4 (10), G7 (13), and G9 (16) are in a late stage
of construction. Launch Group H (16-26)
remains in a midstage of construction and now
contains 10 sites, following the identifidation of
Launch Site H10 (26) on
This site is negated on
and is first visible on Mission
GLADKAYA COMPLEX
Launch Group F (7-15) and P robable Launch
Group G (16-21) have not been covered by F__
photography since our last revision.
OLOVYANNAYA COMPLEX
Olovyannaya Launch Groups D (4-13), E
(14-23), and Probable Launch Groups F (24)
and G (25 -27) have not been covered byl
photography since our last revision.
PERM COMPLEX
Launch Groups G (7-16) and H (17) have not
our last revision.
TATISHCHEVO COMPLEX
Launch Groups A (1-11), B (12-21), C
(23-27), and D (28-29) have not been covered
by 0 photography since our last re-
PACE AND EXTENT OF SINGLE-SILO DEPLOYMENT
General
It is apparent that the Soviets have designed
their single-silo deployment program to signi-
ficantly increase the total number of operational
ICBM launchers and reduce site vulnerability
through dispersion and hardening. It is signi-
ficant to note that whereas the number of opera-
tional hard launchers at deployed complexes
will probably increase from the current figure
of 78 to over 250 by mid-1967, the number of
aiming points will be increased from 26 to
over 200 in the same period.
It is not yet clear to what extent current
deployment programs will continue, or whether
they will be succeeded by follow-on programs.
We still are unable to determine whether the
Soviets intend to increase the credibility of
their deterrent force by the addition of a signifi-
cant, but relatively limited, number of launchers
in a comparatively short period of time; whether
the rate and pace of construction observed thus
far will continue for several years; or whether
the single-silo deployment program is designed
to eventually match the US program in numbers.
Succeeding paragraphs present our analysis of
existing evidence relating to the pace and extent
of the single-silo deployment program.
Type IIIC Site Deployment
Of the 64 confirmed, probable and possible
Type IIIC sites identified to date, about 38
were begun in = and the remaining 26 in
From this, it appears that deployment
of this configuration is continuing at about the
same rate as in The Soviets are experi-
enced in building this launch site configuration
and do not appear to be having difficulties with
development and production of the associated
SS-9 missile system. Construction of these
sites, however, was apparently scheduled at
a slow and deliberate pace. This site configu-
ration and the missile system it probably will
employ are not compatible with large-scale
economical deployment, as the Type IIID site
and its associated system appear to be. We
think, therefore, that the Type IIIC deployment
25
25
25
25
25
Approved For PsSFORE
 For lFP-aT.?.A83Jj2 19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6
program will continue at about the pace observed
to date and, when complete, will number some
100 to 200 silos.
Type IIID Site Deployment
Of the 100 confirmed, probable, and possible
Type IIID launch sites identified to (late, about
85 were begun in
F
and the remaining 15
11 were begun in=and only 3 thus far in
0
effort the Soviets have yet exerted in terms of
ICBM site activations and sustained construction
activity, it does not appear to be a "crash"
program. Construction progress at individual
launch sites has been relatively slow and
deliberate, for undetermined reasons. We
expect that construction of new sites at identi-
fied complexes will continue, and that additional
complexes may be constructed to accommodate
deployment of third- and fourth-generation
missile systems. In this respect, however, it
should be pointed out that most of the 25 identi-
fied complexes provide room for expansion and
could support a total of several hundred more
launchers if the Soviets decide to limit their
current de-:)loyment program to these instal-
lations.
While the evidence is not yet conclusive, this
may indicate a temporary slowdown in Type
IIID site deployment, possibly related. to missile
system difficulties. As with Type III(: sites, the
pace of construction activity is slow and deliber-
ate. We have not yet identified the missile
system or systems to be deployed in these silos,
but it is apparent that it will be a small missile,
roughly comparable to the US Minuteman in
size, and designed for a deployment program
of several hundred launchers. We believe that,
barring technical difficulties with development
of the missile system, Type IIID site deployment
will continue for the next several years.
Comparison With Previous Programs
It now appears that some 120 identified
single silos were begun during = about
30 more launchers than the previous high
achieved in = In terms of sustained con-
struction activity, the previous high total of
about 140 launchers concurrently under con-
A total of more than 150 confirmed and probable
launchers (including 4 soft sites at Plesetsk)
are currently under construction, and there are
almost certainly several tens more that are
either undetected or will start before the first
single-silo site in the field is operational.
Conclusions
In summary, while the current Soviet single-
silo deployment program represents the greatest
Approved For FMrS1 ddk 0
SOFT SITE DEPLOYMENT AT PLESETSK
Probable Launch Sites G (9) and H (10)
at Plesetsk were covered by
Both remain in a midstage of
construction. Backfilling of ditches at both
launch sites is nearly finished. The pad areas
at both sites are not clearly defined, but we
believe that each will ultimately have 2 rail-
served launch pads. We cannot equate these
probable launch sites to any prototype at Tyura-
tam, nor is there any indication that similar
sites are under construction at other identified
complexes. We also are unable to associate
any weapons system with thse sites.
MODE OF OPERATION OF HARD ICBM SITES
There is good evidence that Type IIIA (SS-7)
and Type IIIC hard ICBM sites are configured
to allow the missile to fly out of the silo. These
silos are similar, if not identical, in size, con-
figuration,and method of construction. Both are
covered by a silo door, indicating
a requirement to protect something more than
the approximateI 1iameter silo aperture.
Severar___~hotographs of both types of sites
 63?OO'
I
LAUNCH
COMPLEX G o L2
-~ Railroad
Road
--- Trail
SA-2 SAM Site
? Launch complex components
Support-type components
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP79T04757A000300010019-e ?145'
LAUNCH
COMPLEX E I
E3 E2 I
25X1
Approved For Re~ga~+39AYE13/r -r, QA P7~,pg47t449p ,300010019-6
B32
0 B32A
B32B
LAUNCH
COMPLEX F \\
o `
L8
1 :1
TO TASHKENT
0
25X1
 19: CIA-RDP78T04757A000300010019-6
single-silo launch site at Tyuratam, and by the
launch of the Proton I space vehicle from Launch
Site G3/G4.
firing of an SS-9 ICBMto Kamchatka
probably represented troop training, since te-
lemetry was reduced and there was no Flim Flam
tracking. On Oa probable SS-9 launch
resulted in an early inflight failure.
a probable SS-9 operation to the 4,500-
nm Pacific Impact Area was accomplished.
Flim Flam evidence indicated Launch Complex
B as the most likely launch point. Launch Site
B2 (16), a Type IIIC prototype, has recently
been completed. This was the 25th identified
launch of the SS-9 ICBM, 18 of which have
been successful.
Launches of the TT-2 missile occurred
on The first resulted in
an early inflight failure. The second, launched
from Complex G, successfully reached the
Kamchatka Impact Area.
Proton I, described as a scientific space
station by the Soviets, was launched on
probably from Launch Site G3/G4 at Tyuratam.
Analysis to date indicates that a new booster
was used in the launching and orbiting of a
payload weighing in excess of 2 tons.
Other ICBM firing activity at the range was
limited to the SS-7 missile system. Probable
troop training firings to Kamchatka took place
on
operation intended for the Klyuchi Impact Area
resulted in an early inflight failure.
Approved For 11as556MI /19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6
For F
lur spee
appear to show apertures on either side of the
silos. Recent isodensimetric studies of Type
IIIC launch sites in a midstage of construction
confirm the presence of these apertures, and we
are convinced that they are exhaust vents.
There is no comparable evidence concerning
the design of Type IIIB (SS-8) hard sites.
However, analysis of recently released Soviet
films indicates that the SS-8 is, in fact, launched
from the silo.
We see no evidence of a venting system at
Type IIID sites, but believe that the missile
will have a fly-out capability, possibly venting
itself in the hole in the same manner as the US
Minuteman. We cannot exclude an elevate-to-
launch technique, but do believe that such a
system would be a backward step inconsistent
with demonstrated Soviet capabilities.
TYURATAM MISSILE TEST CENTER
Test Range Facilities
The Tyuratam Missile Test Center (Fig-
ure 23) was partially covered by -to-fair
quality photography on both
No significant activity could be discerned on
either mission, and the quality of the photography
precluded detailed interpretation of the few
sites that were covered.
Test Range Facilities
Firing activity on the Tyuratam test range
during the period
was highlighted by continued R&D testing of
the liquid-fueled TT-2 missile, by the first
probable launch of the SS-9 missile from a
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
 '% Sx V. V S Z V
? RAKVE
KOZ\ANOVI CHI
KONKOV
BROD
INA DERAZHNYA
RSHCHEVA?5,.ZHMER NKA
?AUMAN
AYA KAMENETS-~ R~NOV
p? NPIC ..oF GA 3
-9 0 V.E T S~A
ANKA
ZHUR
AKTYU BIN SK ?
? FEDOROVKA ANASTAEVKA
SARY OZEGAN CHA ARANO-ORENBURGSKOYE
cP/
KREMOV
I
MOBC
BLACK
SEA
MRBM SOFT SITE A MREIM HARD SITE
IRBM SOFT SITE A IRBM HARD SITE
0 MRBM LAUNCH FACILITY
Approved For F ,I sp eefff
MOR SON
?:SELV\UB
s EL
V \4,MARIN,
c Ii. \
1
 For Ft sg 9 f{t2/19 : CIA-RDP78T04757A000300010019-6
SOVIET IRBM/MRBM DEPLOYMENT
GENERAL
Our recently completed review and analysis
of the Soviet IRBM/MRBM deployment program
shows that significant developments during the
past year include (a) confirmation that deploy-
ment of the SS-5 IRBM system and the SS-4
MRBM system in primary sites has ended; (b)
a current IRBM/MRBM force level somewhat
lower than that previously estimated; (c) a
significant increase in the number of fixed field
sites associated with deployed MRBM com-
plexes; and (d) firm evidence that SS-4s and SS-5s
at deployed hard sites have a fly-out capability.
Based on the quality and frequency of
coverage, and considering the fact
that new site construction ceased in early
0
configuration. These figures reflect a reduction
of some 26 launchers (18 IRBM, 8 MRBM) over
the totals we were carrying a year ago. This
reduction, and probable further reductions in the
number of operational launchers during the next
few months are explained in succeeding
paragraphs.
Inactive or Abandoned Hard Sites
The tables in our 14th Revision reflected
the fact that about 26 IRBM/MRBM launch silos
were still under construction in the summer of
0
Some of these, including all the MRBM
sites, have since been completed. Four IRBM
sites, however, were not completed. One site
at Bolshaya Kamenka has definitely been a-
bandoned. Construction activity at 3 others,
Karakhobda, Novosysoyevka 3 and Taybola 3 has
been lacking for a considerable period of time
and we believe that they are inactive, if not
abandoned. We have dropped all 4 of these sites
from our inventory.
Half Sites
Recent coverage of the Bereza IRBM sites
at the Krolevets Complex (See 17th Revision)
revealed that this launch facility has only 2
launch pads rather than the 4 normally associated
with IRBM/MRBM soft sites. A review of all
other IRBM/MRBM soft sites shows no evidence
that other "half sites" exist.
for the SS-4 and early =for the SS-5, we
believe that few, if any, IRBM/MRBM primary
sites of known configuration remain undetected.
CURRENT FORCE LEVELS
General
The IRBM component of the Strategic Rocket
Forces (Table 4) currently consists of 14 com-
plexes containing 109 launchers at 15 soft and
17 hard sites. All are estimated to be opera-
tional. Figure 24 shows the location of deployed
IRBM/MRBM complexes. Typical configura-
tions of IRBM/MRBM launch sites, with associ-
ated missile systems are depicted in Figure 25.
The Soviet MRBM force (Table 5) currently
consists of 624 identified launchers at 67 com-
plexes containing 156 individual launch sites.
Of these 624 launchers, all of which are opera-
tional, 540 are soft and 84 are in a hard
configuration.
The total identified IRBM/MRBMforce con-
sists of 733 operational launchers deployed at
188 primary launch sites in 81 complexes. Of
the total of 733 launchers, 135 are in a hard
Singly Deployed Sites
Three singly deployed soft sites (1 IRBM,
2 MRBM) have been abandoned during the past
year and there is good evidence that at least 4
of the remaining 6 will also be deactivated in
the near future. These 9 soft sites--5 MRBM
(Kraskino, Marina Gorka, Rozhdestvenka, Sled-
yuki, and Uzhgorod) and 4 IRBM (Bayram-Ali,
Ramoye, Traktovyy, and Zhuravka)--are unique
not only for their single deployment, but also
for the lack of usual administration and housing
facilities (Figure 26). We have never been able
to determine the role of these sites in the
25
25
25
Approved For ?r- EIP;
 25X1 Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6
 For Pp s~ ffl 2
Strategic Rocket Forces. The time frame of
their construction (1962-early 1963) suggests a
relationship with the Cuban missile crisis, but
this can neither be confirmed nor denied.
Numerous personnel and vehicular revetments
have been observed in and around the Bayram-Ali
and Rozhdestvenka launch sites on =lPho-
tography. Their presence, and the fact that
military installations are located in the vicinity
of both sites, suggests a training function. How-
ever, a missile exercise has never been observed
at any of the 9 sites. In fact, activity and/or
equipment has been visible on only 2 occasions:
possible erectors and prime movers at Bayram-
Ali in 0 and vehicles on the access
road to the Rozhdestvenka site in
It appears that whatever the role played by
these sites, they are being phased out. The
sites at Bayram-Ali, Rozhdestvenka, and Sled-
yuki have been dismantled and we have dropped
them from the operational inventory (Table 8).
We are currently carrying the remaining 6 sites
in an operational status, although there are in-
dications that dismantling may be beginning at
4 of the sites. We estimate that all of these
sites will be deactivated by
Projected Force Levels
We believe that planned deployment of the
SS-4 MRBM and SS-5 IRBM in primary sites
was completed by mid-1965 and that, except
for a slight reduction in operational launchers
as the singly deployed sites are inactivated,
this force level will remain relatively constant
through mid-1967. The fact that no new MRBM
or IRBM site starts have been observed since
early respectively, is a
strong indication that construction of primary
sites for the SS-4 and SS-5 has ended. On the
other hand, there is good evidence that all
existing primary IRBM/MRBM sites, other
than the singly deployed facilities, are manned
and operational. Construction activity at site
support facilities indicates that continued occu-
pancy is intended. This construction activity
includes the erection of multistoried barracks,
garages, and, at MRBM soft sites, the addition
of storage tanks. Construction
]is also continuing,
and we expect that in time each will have its
own. There is no activity at any deployed IRBM/
MRBM site indicative that a retrofit program
is underway.
Current Deployment Pattern
Deployment of the IRBM/MRBM components
of the Strategic Rocket Forces has remained in
the previously established pattern, covering
targets in Europe, North Africa, portions of the
Far and Middle East, and limited areas in
Alaska and Greenland. Composition of the com-
plexes is given in Table 9.
With 1 possible exception, there is no evi-
dence of any mixing of IRBM/MRBM systems
within a complex. The systems may be mixed
at the Ugolnyy site, located near Anadyr in the
Soviet Far East and targeted against Alaska
(Figure 27). Recent coverage of this launch
facility--carried as an MRBM site--shows that
launchers of 2 different dimensions may be on
each pair of pads. Further analysis of on-site
equipment and vehicles will be required before
deployment of both the SS-4 and SS-5 at this
site can be confirmed.
Refire Capability
We continue to believe that IRBM/MRBM
soft sites were designed to permit the launching
of refire missiles and that these sites carry a
refire missile for each launcher.
MODE OF OPERATION FROM HARD SITES
We are virtually certain that both the SS-4
and SS-5 have a fly-out capability from deployed
hard sites (See 19th Revision). Our original
Approved For F pssLTfit2'19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6
25
25
25
25
 AppFaved fi
or Fj1sg N1 19 : CIA-RDP78T04757A000300010019-6
RAMOYE',
J AREA OF
-)MAIN MAP
AM RI GORKA
~SL.EDYUKt
ZHURAVKA
TRAKTOVYY ? ROZHDE VENKA\
BAYRAM-ALI
- ,r KRASKINO
Approved For F sSeR'T
 For Pel sIR9 19: CIA-RDP78T04757A000300010019-6
BUILDING UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
25
25
25
Approved For TsWRET
25
 c
Approve
For Re leas 20031 19 : CIA-RD P78T04757A000300010019-6
judgment in this respect, contained in our 16th
Revision, was based on analysis of excellent
=photography of several IRBM hard sites in
various stages of construction. It was confirmed
in the launch sequences in the Soviet Film
"Rockets Guard the Peace" televised throughout
Europe in May 1965.
FIXED FIELD SITES
We are still unable to assign a common
function to the 85 fixed field sites identified to
date on photography (Table 7). We
firmly believe, however, that the SS-4 MRBM
is the only currently operational strategic
missile system capable of using such field launch
facilities. Continuing analysis of these sites
indicates that they do not all serve the same
purpose. Indeed, some may be associated with
military units other than those belonging to the
Strategic Rocket Forces. Although some fixed
field positions may actually represent the alter-
nate/reserve positions referred to inC
documents, many, because of their proximity to
parent primary MRBM sites, would make poor
alternate positions. Additionally, winter pho-
tography of some 45 of these sites reveals no
evidence of snow removal, indicating that their
role, if operational, is on a seasonal basis.
Field training for operational crews appears to
be a logical function of some of the pads; training
exercises have been identified at 5 sites, utiliz-
ing equipment removed from a nearby permanent
facility. Some of the older sites probably repre -
sent early deployment of the now obsolete SS-3
MRBM system.
It is interesting to note that of the 85 identi-
fied fixed field sites, the majority were con-
structed Only a few sites constructed
have been identified to date. About 50
of the 67 MRBM complexes have 1 or more fixed
field- sites associated with them. The greatest
number associated with a single complex are
the 4 at Korosten, which contains only 2 pri-
mary sites.
FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS
Evidence of follow-on systems is somewhat
ambiguc--s. The Soviets have paraded what
appears to be a solid-fueled mobile rocket,
designated the SCAMP by the western intelli-
gence community. Marshal Krylov, Comman-
der-in-Chief, Soviet Strategic Rocket Forces,
claims that it is capable of intermediate ranges.
No flight test program for such a vehicle to
strategic ranges (over 600 nm) has been iden-
tified. However, at Kapustin Yar, flight testing
of an apparent new system (s) to tactical ranges
has been underway since This
program could involve component testing for a
follow-on IRBM/MRBM system. In addition,
at Kapustin Yar Launch Site 4C1 (prototype for
MRBM hard sites) 2 silos have been undergoing
modification for over a year; 1 silo apparently
will be rai:. served.
Unless there is a drastic change in tar-
geting requirements, we see no reason for the
Soviets to expand their total IRBM/MRBM force
beyond its present level, in terms of operational
launchers. If a follow-on system is deployed
within the near term, we believe that it will
be road mobile and that a number of soft laun-
chers will be phased out, with possible retrofit
of existing hard launch sites to accommodate
the new system.
Approved For ssLTfi12r19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6
 APPFUV
hardened)
dFor TWJE2 1'fl
It is estimated that the long-term Soviet
trend in IRBM/MRBM systems will be toward
solid-propellant missiles and increased mo-
bility. By 1970 current systems probably will
have been supplemented by solid-propellant mis-
siles deployed on mobile launchers and in
hardened silos which may be modifications of
existing sites. The force will be characterized
by improved flexibility, reliability and reaction
time, and decreased vulnerability.
The total strength of the force may rise as
new systems are introduced, but will not be in-
creased significantly beyond current levels un-
less additional target requirements occur (e.g.
The implications of mobile IRBM/MRBM
missile systems, if successfully developed and
deployed, are significant. They would permit
the Soviets to enjoy the benefits of publicizing the
existence of such a capability without com-
promising the number of operational launchers
available or the location of launch points. Such
systems would probably be capable of undetected
movement and concealment both within and out-
side the borders of the USSR.
DEVELOPMENTS AT DEPLOYED COMPLEXES
General
XP
X covere o and o t e
67 MRBM complexes. Significant observations
are summarized in succeeding paragraphs.
Taybola IRBM Complex
i
Irevealed that
site construction has failed to progress at Tay-
bola Launch Site 3 and we are dropping it from
our tables as inactive.
Sites Without Support Facilities
covered 2 of the
6 remaining singly deployed sites. At Trak-
tovyy, there was no apparent change in fa-
cilities or any further evidence of dismantling.
At Zhuravka, however, a building has been re-
moved from thel
Pending further
coverage, we are continuing to carry this site
in the operational inventory.
Sary Ozek IRBM Complex
showed that
tank-like objects have been removed from the
silo covers at the Kara Babau 2 Launch Site
since F__ I(Figure 28). This launch site
Fixed Field Sites
Five additional fixed field sites, each with
4 firing positions, have been identified since
our last revision, bringing the total sites to 85
and total launchers to 312 (Table 7). New sites
include a fourth fixed field facility at the Dyatlovo
MRBM Complex, a second at the Gomel, Molo-
skovitsy and Torva MRBM Complexes; and the
first at the Kozhanovichi MRBM Complex.
KAPUSTIN YAR MISSILE TEST CENTER
Test Range Facilities
The Kapustin Yar Missile Test Center (Fig-
ure 30) has not been covered since our last
revision. A summary evaluation of selected
launch facilities is given in Table 6.
Test Range Activity-
During the period
from the rangehead. In addition, there were 4
SS-4 firings from Makat to the 1, 050-nm impact
area and a firing of an SS-5 to Kamchatka from
an operational site in the Soviet Far East.
The SS-4 firings from Kapustin Yar were
associated with troop training. The purpose of
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
Approved For I~pra ~31~112/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6
 For RFbTs@. EM 19:CIA-RDP78T04757A000300010019-6
Approved For RTb r Sff/
 XppgMd FnWlea=W03~9 : iDF)47~00 100 M
25X1
25X1
25X1
0
SAM BASE
SUPPORT
COMPLEX
KAPUSTIN
YAR
PROBABLE PROPELLANT
HANDLING AND
STORAGE AREA
COMPLEX C
HOUSING AND
5UPPORT AREA
RANGEHEAD TRANSMITTING
TEST AND COMMUNICATIONS SITE
SUPPORT COMPLEX
Q5X1
m
25X
25
X1
PROBABLE SAM
LAUNCH AREA _+O
MARSHALING.
AREA
SAM LAUNCH
COMPLEX
SA-1
SA-2 SA-3
_--SAM H04JSING AND
5UPPdRT AREA
INITIAL SAM
SUPPORT FACILITIES
TROOP TRAINING AND
SUPPORT AREA -
ELECTRONIC
R IN D SITE
f PROBABLE MISSILE
ASSEMBLY AND
._KAPUSTIN YAR AIRFIELD CHECKOUT AREA
LAUNCH COMPLEX H
SQUARE TYPE INTERFEROMETER
4C SUPPORT AREA
3C LAUNCH COMPLEX C
4C
-COMPLEX D FINAL ASSEMBLY
AND CHECKOUT AREA
INITIAL SAM
^ LAUNCH FACILITIES
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6
 Approved
For RTbreS V /
the Makat firings to Sary Shagan cannot be deter-
mined. The SS-5 firings from Kapustin Yar complex (probably Novosysoyevka) on
were also probably associated with troop train-
ing. One, on was fired to a range of
IIwas the second identified launch of a mis-
2,417 nm -- possibly a fuel depletion test, in
TABLE 1. SUMMARY OF ESTINIATED STATUS OF IDENTIFIED ICBM IRBM, AND MRBM
LAUNCHERS AT DEPLOYED COMPLEXES,
Operational
IC
B
M
IRBM
IA 3
4
4 0
I
II 15 58
58 0
IB 2
4
0 4
I
V 17 51
51 0
IIA 5
1
0 1
0 0
32
IIB 29
58
5
8 0
IIC 7
14
1
4 0
IID 30
60
6
0 0
84, 336
336 0
IIIA 23
69
6
9 0
I
I 5:. 204
204 0
IIIB 3
9
9 0
I
V 21 84
84 0
IIIC** 65
65
0 65
156 624
624 0
IIID*** 104 1
04
0 104
TOTALS 271 3
97
22
4 173
GRA
ND
TOT
AL
*See Tables 2, 4, and 5 for details. Figures include 3 launch silos at Type IIIA and IIIB
ICBM and Type IV IRBM sites, and 4 launch silos at Type IV MRBM sites. Type IIIC
and IIID ICBM sites contain single silos. ICBM figures include 4 Type IIIC sites at the
Zhangiz-Tobe Complex, 11 Type IIID sites at the Olovyannaya Complex, and 3 Type IIID
sites at the Tatishchevo Complex detected on
he additional data are not reflected in text, or in Table 2.
**Figures do not include 3 sites carried in the possible category.
***Figures do not include 13 sites carried in the possible category.
Approved For RfbpseStn"
 M M M M ~ppao Flea=00342W: JWD1 )47~003M00~ 2W = IM lM
25X1
25X1
Site A(1)
Site B(2)
Site C(3)
Site D(4)
Site E(5)
Site F(6)
Site A(4)
Site BM
Site C(2)
Site 0(1)
Site E 6)
Site F(7)
Site G(l I)
Site H(10) Probable
Site 1(8) Probable
Site 7(9) Probable
Site K(12) Possible
Site A(1)
Site B(2)
Site C 4
Site D 3)
Site E(5)
Site F(6)
Group G (7-18)
Group H(16-26)
GLADKAYA
Site A 3)
Site B(2)
Site D(5)
Group F (7-15)
Group G(16-21)
Probable
IMENI GASTELLO
Site A(1)
Site B 2)
Site C3)
Site D(4)
Site E(5)
Site F(6)
Site G(7)
Site H((8)
Site I(9)
Site 3(10)
Site K(11)
ITATKA
Site A(1)
Site B(2)
Site C(3)
KARTALY
Site A(l)
Site B(2)
Site C 3
Site D 4
Site E 5)
Site F(6)
Site G(7)
Site H(8)
Site I(10) Probable
Site S
Site K(11)
Site L Possible
Site M Possible
Type of
Site
52-27N 82-35E IIIC
52-29N 82-40E IIIC
52-33N 82-42E Ill
52-32N 82-34E IIIC
52-35N 82-30E IIIC
52-36N 82-36E IIIC
51-tIN 59-37E IIIC 1
fl -06N 59-38E IIIC 1
-SiN 59-41E II IC 1
50-58N 59-32E IIIC 1
51-04N 59-28E IIIC 1
51-09N 59-31E II IC 1
51-12N 59-S1E IIC 1
51-09N 59-44E IIIC 1
51-02N 59-57E IIIC 1
51-06N 59-SOE IIIC 1
51-ION 59-58E IIIC 1
51-25N 113-OOE Ill 2
51-25N 113-04E ILIA 3
51-28N 113-04E IID 2
51-20N 113-O1E 1ID 2
51-23N 112-50E ILIA 3
51-20N 112-55E IIIA 3
51-31N 113-041 IIID 10
51-23N 112-57E IIID 10
56-20N 92-18E I'D 2
56-25N 92-27E IID 2
56-20N 92-13E IIIA 3
56-13N 92-13E IIID 7
56-15N 91-45E 1110 1
51-03N 66-06E IIIC 1
51-06N 66-02E 111C 1
51-ION 66-06E Ill 1
51-07N 66-13E IIIC 1
51-13N 66-13E IIIC 1
51-13N 66-05E BIC 1
50-57N 66-09E IHC 1
50-58N 66-OOE IIIC 1
50-58N 66-17E IIIC 1
50-52N 66-19E IIIC 1
50-52N 65-59E IIIC 1
56-59N 85-32E IIB 2
57-01N 85-39E IIB 2
56-54N 85-39E IID 2
53-01N 60-26E IIIC 1
52-56N 60-31E I11C 1
52-555 60-24E IIIC 1
52 -SIN 60-27E IIIC 1
53-OON 60-16E 1110 1
53-04N 60-18E IIIC 1
53-09N 60-42E ^lC 1
53-08N 60-34F IIIC 1
53-09N 60-25E IIIC 1
53-12N 60-39E IIIC
53-12N 60-32E IIIC 1
53-12N 60-IIE BIC
3-05N 60-07E IIIC
Number of
Launchers
Site
Negated
First
Coverage
Latest
Coverage
Stage of Const on Last
Usable Coverage
Mid
Mid
Mid
Mid
Mid
Mid
6?5X165
Estimated
Status
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
Mid 66 U/C
Mid 66 U/C
Mid 66 U/C
Mid 66 U/C
Mid 66 U/C
Early 67 U/C
Early 67 U/C
Early 67 U/C
Early 67 U/C
Early 67 U/C
Early 25X1 U/C
Complete 63 Operational
Complete 64 Operational
Complete 63 Operational
Complete 64 Operational
Complete 64 Operational
Complete 64 Operational
Mid 66 U/C
Mid 66 U/C
Complete 63 Operational
Complete 64 Operational
Complete 64 Operational
Early 66 U/C
Early 66 U/C
Mid 66
Mid 66
Mid 66
Mid 66
Mid 66
Mid
Early 67
Early 67
Early 67
Early 67
Early 67
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
Complete 62 Operational
Complete 63 Operational
Complete 63 Operational
Mid
Mid 66
Mid 66
Mid 66
Mid 66
Mid
Early 66
Mid 67
Early 67
Early 67
Early
Early
Early
Estimated Quarter
Site Operational
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
U/C
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6
 Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6
Stage of Const on Last
Usable Coverage
Date Man Const
25X1
25X1
Site A 1)
Site B 2)
Site C 3)
Site D(4)
Site E 5)
Site F 6)
Site G 7)
Site A(3)
Site B 2)
Site .14)
Site E 5
Site F 6
Site A(2)
Site B(l)
Site C(3)
Site D(4)
Site E(5)
Site A(1)
Site B 2)
Site C 3)
Group D (4-13)
Group E (14-23)
Group F(24) Probabl
Group G(25-27)
Probable
Site A(1)
Site B(2)
Site C(3)
Site D(6
Site E(5))
Site F(4)
Group G(7-16)
Group H (17) 1/
PLESETSK
Site 1(1)
Site 2(2)
Site 3(3)
Site A 4)
Site B 5)
Site C((6)
Site D(8)
Site E((7)
Site F 2/
Site G 9) Probable
Site H(10) Probable
Site A(1)
Site B(2)
Site C(3)
Type of
Site
Number of
Launchers
8-02N 41-22E LIB 2
8-02N 41-07E IIB 2
7-59N 41-09E IIB 2
8-05N 41-40E IIB 2
7-58N 41-14E lllA 3
7-55N 41-10E IID 2
8-06N 41-32E I1D 2
3-54N 35-45E IIC 2
3-48N 35-47E IIC 2
3-54N 35-StE IIC 2
3-51N 35-41E 1IIB 3
3-41N 35-39E IIIB 3
5-19N 83-10E IIB 2
S-19N 83-02E IIIA 3
S5 .23n1 82-54E tllA 3
5-22N 83-14E 11D 2
55-20N 82-56E IID 2
50-54N 115-48E IIIA 3
50-55N 115-45E II IA 3
51-OiN 115-58E 1IlA 3
51-04N it6-06E HID 10
50-56N 115-58E IIID 10
50-51N 115-51E IIID 1
50-46N 115-42E HID 3
57-41N 56-11E IIB 2
57-44N 55-55E IIB 2
57-38N 56-07E IIB 2
57-42N 55-47E IID 2
57-45N 56-DOE IID 2
57-41N 56-04E IIIA 3
57-43N 56-07E 1110 10
57-46N 55-49E HID 1
62-56N 40-27E IA 2
62-56N 40-32E IA 1
62-58N 40-41E IA 1
62-59N 40-47E IIA 2
63-03N 40-57E IIB 2
63-O1N 40-53E IIIA 3
62-54N 40-47E IIC 2
62-51N 40-35E IIC 2
62-52N 40-44E
62-53N 40-51E IB 2
62-53N 40-52E IB 2
56-09N 63-51E IIIA 3
56-ION 64-02E IIIA 3
56-07N 63-57E IIIA 3
Site
Negated
First
Coverage
Latest
Coverage
Date Msn
Complete 6225X1 Operational
Complete 62 Operational
Complete 62 Operational
Complete 63 Operational
Complete 63 Operational
Complete 63 Operational
Complete 64 Operational
Complete 63 Operational
Complete 63 Operational
omplete 63 Operational
omplete 64 Operational
Complete 63
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete 64
25X1
63
2X31
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Operational
Complete 64 Operational
Complete 64 Operational
Complete 64 Operational
Late 66 U/C
Mid 66 U/C
Early 67 U/C
Early 67 U/C
Complete 62 Operational
Complete 62 Operational
Complete 63 Operational
Complete 63 Operational
Complete 64 Operational
Complete 64 Operational
Early 66 66 U/C
Complete 60 Operational
Complete 60 Operational
Complete 60 Operational
Complete 61 Operational
Complete 62 Operational
Complete 63 Operational
Complete 63 Operational
Complete 63 Operational
Mid 65 U/C
Mid 65 U/C
Complete 63 Operational
Complete 64 Operational
Complete 64 Operational
i M r'pp~d F -leaM003M 9: SWDF047~00: 100 M M
 Mpp.l F~Iea'03~: tDP~47!003M001r M M
25X1
25X1
Type of
Site
Number of
Launchers
Site
Negated
First
Coverage
Latest
Coverage
Stage of Const on Last
Usable Coverage
Estimated Quarter
Site Operational
Estimated
Status
Site AN
25X1 Site B(1)
51-55N 128 OE LIB 2
51-49N 128-19E IIB 2
Complete
Complete
25X1
62
Operational
Operational
Site C(2)
51-53N 128-23E IIB 2
Complete
62
Operational
Site D(4)
51-58N 128-07F I'D 2
Complete 64
Operational
Site E(6)
51-43N 128-OOE lID 2
Complete
63
Operational
Site F(5)
51-52N 128-13E IID 2
Complete
63
Operational
Site G(7)
51-38N 127-58E IIIA 3
Complete
64
Operational
Site H(8)
52-03N 128-06E IID 2
Complete 64
Operational
Group A 1-11)
(
51-48N 45-39E IIID 10
Late
65
U/C
12-21)
Group B
51-33N 45-29E IIID 10
Mid
66
U/C
Group C(22-27)
Sl-30N 45-1SE 111D 5
Early
66
U
0 Group D(28-29) 3/
TEYKOVO
51-29N 45-34E HID 3
Early
66
/C
U/C 0
Site A(1)
56-55N 40-27E IIB 2
Com
l
62
con Site B(2)
56-56N 40-33E IIB 2
p
ete
Complete
62
Operational
Operational
Site C(3)
Site D(4)
56-55N 40-17E IIB 2
56-59N 40-40E 1ID 2
Complete 63
Complete
25X1
63
Operational
Operational ri
Site E 5)
56-49N 40-IOE IID 2
Complete
63
Operational
Site F(6)
25Xrn
56-55N 40-22E lID 2
Complete
64
Operational
ri
Si
A
te
N
Site C(2)
56-52N 65-34E IIC 2
56-51N 65-27E IIC 2
Complete
Complete
63
63
Operational
Operational
Site A(1)
Site B(2)
55-20N 88-43E IIIC
55-18N 89-38E IIIC
1
1
Mid 66
U/C
Site C(3)
Site D(4)
55-20N 89-33E IIIC
55-17N 89-26E IIIC
1
1
Mid 66
Mid 66
U/C
U/C
Site E 5)
Site F 6)
55-13N 89-33E IIIC
55-25N 89-39E IIIC
1
1
Mid 66
Mid 66
U/C
Site G(7)
55-22N 89-27E IIIC
1
Mid 66
/
Site H(8)
55-19N 89-20E IIIC
1
Early
66
U
C
Site 1 (9)
55-13N 89-21E IIIC
1
Mid
66
U/C
Site J(10)
55-12N 89-09E IIIC
I
Mid
66
U/C
Site K(11)
Site L(12)
55-16N 89-IOE IIIC
08N 8
55
1
Early 67
Mid 67
U/C
U
C
Site M(13)
-
9-37E IIIC
55-13N 89-42E IIIC
1
I
Early
67
/
U/C
Site N(14)
55-25N 89-15E IIIC
1
Early
67
U/C
Site 0(15)
Early
67
U/C
Site P(16)
55-OIN 89-33E IIIC
1
Early
67
U/C
Site Q(17)
55-02N 89-43E IIIC
1
Early
67
U/C
VERKHNYAYA SALD
A
Early
67
U/C
Site A(2)
8-09N 60-16E IIB 2
Complete 62
Operational
Site B 1)
8-06N 60-21E IIA 2
Complete
61
Operational
Site C 3)
Complete
61
Operational
Site D 4
8-12N 60-34E IIB 2
Complete
62
Operational
Site E 5)
8-14N 60-55E 1IB 2
Complete
62
Operational
Site F 7)
8-14N 60-41E IIIA
3
Complete
63
Operational
Site G 8
8-13N 60-49E IIIA
3
Complete
63
Operational
Site H 9)
8-05N 60-13E LID 2
Complete
63
Operational
Site 1(10)
8-09N 60-32E 1ID 2
Complete
63
Operational
Site A(2)
7-48N 33-36E IIB 2
Complete
62
Operational
Site B(1)
7-48N 33-14E IIB 2
Complete
62
Operational
Site C(5)
7-49N 33-08E IID 2
Complete 64
Operational
Site D
(4)
7-48N 33-28E IID 2
Complete
63
Operational
(
Site E 8)
7-52N 33-18E IIIA
Complete
63
Operational
Site F(6)
7-44N 33-06E 11D 2
Complete
63
Operational
Site G(7)
7-47N 33-02E IID 2
Complete 64
Operational
Site 1(3)
7-52N 33-27E IIIA
Complete
63
Operational
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6
 Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6 25X1
25X1
25X1
Site A(i)
Site B 2)
Site C(3)
Site D(4)
Site E(5)
Site F'(6)
Site A(2)
Site B(1)
Site C(3)
Site D(4)
Site 15(5)
Site F(7)
Site G(6)
Site H(8)
Site 1(11)
Site d(9)
Site K(10)
Site A(1)
Site B 2)
Site C(3)
Site D(4)
Site E(5)
Site F(6)
Type of
Site
Number of
Launchers
56-35N 48-09E IIB 2
56-35N 48-18E IIB 2
56-32N 48-27E JIB 2
56-31N 48-20E IID 2
56-34N 48-13E IID 2
56-36N 48-28E IID 2
59 ION 49-32E IIA 2
59-09N 49-4015 IlA 2
59-13N 49-25E JIB 2
59-16N 49-22E JIB 2
59-23N 49-17E ILIA 3
59-21N 49-1415 IIB 2
59-04N 49-51E ILIA 3
59-11N 49-47E IID 2
59-21N 49-25E IID 2
59-06N 49-45L IID 2
59-13N 49-18E ILIA 3
49-12N 81-00E IIIC 1
49-16N 80-59E IIIC 1
49-11N 80-54E IIIC 1
49-ION 81-04E Inc 1
49-06N 81-03E IIIC 1
49-08N 80-58E 111C 1
252 150 228
Site
Negated
First
Coverage
*TDI site designators are indicated in parentheses.
**To clarify the terms used in referring to construction stages at single-silo sites, identifiable steps in the
construction process have been categorized as follows: early stage, clearing and grading, open-cut silo
excavation, silo coring; midsta e, silo under construction, silo backfilling; late stage, final backfill and
grading, silo door installed; complete final configuration apparent; operational, equipment installed
and checked out (estimated).
1/ See 19th Revision, page 9.
2/ Not considered an operational ICBM site (see 16th Revision).
3/ See 19th Revision, page 9.
Latest
Coverage
Stage of Const on Last
Usable Coverage
Estimated Quarter
Site Operational
Complete
25X1
Complete
62
Operational
Complete 63
Operational
Complete
63
Operational
Complete
63
Operational
Complete 64
Operational
Complete
61
Operational
Complete
61
Operational
Complete 62
Operational
Complete
62
Operational
Complete
62
Operational
Complete 63
Operational
Complete 64
Operational
Complete
63
Operational
Complete 64
Operational
Complete 64
Operational
Complete
25X164
Operational
Mid 66
U/C
Mid 66
U/C
Mid
U/C
Mid
66
U/C
Mid
66
C/C
Mid
66
U/C
_ M 004ppMd Fy&leag003 jW9 : fWDFI047JW003 100' M M
 = = = NWpp=d Fg&IeaM003VM9 : fWDFk047JW003J100Aft 2L
25X1
Complex Al(l)
A2
A3(15)
A4
Complex B12)
B2(16)
B3(17)
Complex CI(3)
C2
C3
Complex Dl(4)
D2(9)
Complex El(6)
E2
E3
Complex F(5)
Complex Gl/G2 7)
G3/G4(11)
G5/G6(12)
G7(18)
G8/G9(19)
Complex H(8)
Complex I(14)
Complex J
Complex K1/K2 (13)
K3(20)
Launch Group L (21-3
Total
Type of
Site
5-55N 63-21E I
5-55N 63-21E I
5-54N 63-20E IIIC p
Number of
Launchers
I 1
6-OON 63-34E IA p 1
5-59N 63-33E IIIC I
6-OON 63-34E II 1
5-48N 63-39E II P I
5-48N 63-39E II 1
5-48N 63-39E II 1
5-59N 63-57E IIIA p 3
5-59N 63-57E IIIA 3
5-48N 63-12E IIC p 1
5-48N 63-12E IIC 1
5-48N 63-12E IIC 1
6-02N 63-06E IIIB p 3
6-03N 62-56E 1 2
6-03N 62-56E 1 2
6-05N 62-54E II 2
6-04N 62-56E IIIC P 1
6-04N 62-57E Ill 2
5-59N 63-42E I 2
5-56N 63-26E IIIC P 1
5-54N 63-64E I 2
6-02N 63-03t IIIC p 2
6-02N 63-02E IIID P 1
6-03N 62-59E Ill _ 10
21 28
*TDI site designators are indicated in parentheses.
P Prototype.
Site
Negated
First
Coverage
Latest
Coverage
Complete Operational
Complete Operational
Complete Operational
Complete Operational
Complete Operational
Complete Operational
Complete Operational
Complete Operational
Complete Operational
Complete Operational
Complete Operational
Complete Operational
Complete Operational
Complete Operational
Complete Operational
Complete Operational
Complete Operational
Complete Operational
Complete Operational
Mid U/C
Complete Operational
Complete Operational
Complete Operational
Early U/C
Mid U/C
Late Operational
Late U/C
25X1
25X1
25X1
Estimated
Status
Stage of Const on Last
Usable Coverage
Date Man Const
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6
 Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757AO00300010019-6
25X1
25X1
25X1
AKTYUBINSK Launch Complex
PETROVSKIY
BELOMORSK Launch Complex
RAMOYE
FEDOROVKA Launch Complex
TRAKTOVYY
GELLI Launch Complex
KAKASHURA
GELLI
PARATTT.
GRANOV Launch Complex
GR.ANOV1
GRANOV 2
KALNIK
KROLEVETS Launch Complex
KROLEVETS1
KROLEVETS2
BEREZA
LEBEDIN Launch Complex
LEBEDIN 1
LEBEDIN 2
LEBEDIN 3
NIGRANDE Launch Complex
NIGRANDE
SKRUNDA
VAINODE
NOVOSYSOYEVKA Launch Complex
NOVOSYSOYEVKAI
NOVOSYSOYEVKA 2
PERVOMAYSK Launch Complex
KAMENNYY MOST
SEMENOVKA1
SEMENOVKA 2
BE NUMBER COORDINATES
NO OF PADS,'
LAUNCHERS
DATE OF LATEST
PHOTOGRAPHY
0-00-30N 56-58-OOE IV
53-25-15N 62-23-OOE III
42-26-30N 47-28-30E IV
42-47-30N 47-23-OOE IV
48-56-15N 29-30-15E III
48-50-OON 29-28-45E IV
48-59-30N 29-21-45E IV
51-36-45N 33-29-30E III
51-40-45N 33-31-15E III
51-43-45N 33-43-45E III
70-33-OON 34-25-45E iii
50-35-45N 34-24-30E III
50-38-OON 34-27-30E III
56-31-OON 22-02-15E III
56-35-30N 21-49-15E IV
56-28-30N 21-50-15E IV
44-11-45N 133-26-15E III
44-07-15N 133-28-30E IV
47-58-OON 30-53-15E IV
47-58-45N 30-59-OOE IV
47-53-30N 30-58-45E IV
25-X l
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
259 Impletc
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Corny)] pete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
M N o M M MjjAp1 d Frele~00:9 : MRD~04 r I00 1 OOM M M M M
 MW1ppMd FW&lea)03*W9 : WWDFO47jW002M100'66 - ' M M
25X1
25X1
25X1
0
0
N
25
M
SARY OZEK Launch Complex
KARA BABAU 1
KARA BABAU 2
KARA BABAU 3
SMORGON Launch Complex
SMORGON I
SMORGON 2
SSIORGON 3
TAYBOLA Launch Complex
TAYBOLA1
TAYBOLA 2
ZHURAVKA Launch Complex
ZHURAVKA
44-32-OON 77-46-15E III
44-31-OON 77-58-41E IV
44-30-15N 77-41-15E IV
54-31-45N 26-17-30E III
54-26-OON 26-18-30E IV
54-36-15N 26-22-30E III
68-28-OON 33-15-30E IV
68-30-30N 33-23-15E IV
NO OF PADS/
LAUNCHERS
25X1
DATE OF LATEST
PHOTOGRAPHY
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
25X1 Complete
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6
 Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6
25X1
25X1
25X1
O
a
25)
M
M
AKHTYRK.A Launch Complex
.AKHTYRK.A 1
.\KHTYRKA2
Al UKSNE Launch Complex
LEJASCIEbIS I
RUSKI
LEJASCIE\1S 2
AN.ASTASYEVKA Launch Complex
ANASTASYEVKA I
ANASTASYEVKA2
BALTA Launch Complex
RAI,TA 1
BALTA 2
BARANO-ORENBURGSKOYE Launch Complex
SOME ALEKSEYEVSKOYE
BARANO-ORENBURGSKOYE
BELOKOROVICHI Launch Complex
OLEVSK I
OLEVSK 2
RUDNYA ZLOTINSKAYA
BORSHCHEV Launch Complex
SKAI,A PODOL SKALA 1
SKALA PODOLSKAYA 2
BREST Launch Complex
BREST 1
BREST 2
BRODY Launch Complex
BRODY 1
BRODY 2
BERESTECHKO
DERAZHNYA Launch Complex
DERAZHNYAI
DERAZHNYA 2
KHSIELNITSKIY
NO OF PADS/
LAUNCHERS
50-16-OON 34-50-15E II
50-22-OON 34-57-00E II
57-21-OON 26-44-45E II
57-25-155 26-50-OOE II
57-13-OON 26-33-30E IV
48-34-15N 135-37-45E II
48-35-45N 13.5-41-00E II
18-01-45N 29-34-OOE II
48-07-OON 29-34-30E II
44-16-15N 131-22-30E I
44-19-45N 131-30-45E I
5I-OS-45N 28-03-15E I
51-10-80N 27-59-30E I
51-03-305 28-07-30E IV
48-51-DON 26-08-30E I
48-52-465 26-03-30E I
51-48-45N 24-00-45E II
51-51-45N 24-01-45E II
50-06-OON 25-12-15E IV
50-12-46N 25-05-00E I
50-20-OON 25-05-30E I
49-21-OON 27-26-30E II
49-26-15N 27-29-OOE II
49-24-45N 27-08-45E IV
PHOTOGRAPHY
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
25X1COn,plete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
O
0
M
M M M M MWp1 d F~le~003=11 9: MRDi047'00=1100M M a M M
 M M Njj~ppMd F'IeaSW03JW9 : 1DF O47JWOOt100jft 24" = M
25X1
25X1
25X1
DISNA Launch Complex
DISNA
ZELKI
BORKOVICHI
DOLINA Launch Complex
DOLINA 1
DOLINA 2
BOLEKHOV
DROGOBYCH Launch Complex
MEDENITSA
DROGOBYCH
STRYY
DYATLOVO Launch Complex
DYATLOVO
BEREZOVKA
ZBLYANY
GOMEL Launch Complex
BORKHOV1
BORKHOV 2
GRESK Launch Complex
GRESK 1
GRESK 2
URECHYE
GROZNYY Launch Complex
SUNZHENSKOYE
NESTEROVSKAYA
ACHKHOY-MARTAN
GUSEV Launch Complex
GUSEV 1
GUSEV 2
GVARDEYSK Launch Complex
GVARDEYSK1
GVARDEYSK 2
JELGAVA Launch Complex
IECAVA 1
IECAVA 2
IECAVA 3
55-35-15N 28-16-OOE I
55-35-45N 28-24-30E I
55-41-45N 28-27-OOE II
49-03-30N 24-03-30E I
49-06-15N 24-08-30E I
49-06-45N 23-51-15E IV
49-22-15N 23-45-30E I
49-25-30N 23-34-45E I
49-16-45N 23-43-OOE IV
53-32-45N 25-16-45E I
53-35-30N 25-17-30E I
53-35-45N 25-27-30E II
52-18-30N 30-42-45E II
52-24-45N 30-39-OOE II
53-14-15N 27-42-30E I
53-17-OON 27-40-45E I
53-11-OON 27-58-30E II
43-08-15N 44-54-15E I
43-11-30N 44-57-OOE I
43-10-30N 45-10-30E IV
54-41-30N 22-05-OOE I
54-44-OON 22-03-30E I
54-40-30N 21-07-30E I
54-45-15N 21-09-15E I
56-35-30N 24-04-OOE II
56-39-45N 24-07-30E II
56-33-OON 24-20-30E IV
NO OF PADS/
LAUNCHERS
DATE OF LATEST
PHOTOGRAPHY
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
0
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757AO00300010019-6
 Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6 25X1
25X1
25X1
JONAVA Launch Complex
KARNIELAVA
JONAVA
KAMENETS-PODOLSKIY Launch Complex
KANIENETS-PODOLSKIY
DUNAYEVTSY
KIVERTSY Launch Complex
KIVERTSY I
KIVERTSY 2
TROSTYANETS
KONKOVICHI Launch Complex
PETRIKOV
KONKOVICHI
KOROSTEN Launch Complex
KOROSTEN 1
KOROSTEN 2
KOZHANOVICHI Launch Complex
KOZHANOVICHI 1
KOZHANOVICHI 2
KRASKINO Launch Complex
KRASKINO
KRASNOZNAMENSK Launch Complex
VIESVILLE
RAGNIT
KRENMOVO Launch Complex
KIZEN10VO
LYALICHI
KURGANCHA Launch Complex
KURGANCHAI
KURGANCHA 2
TYNI
LIDA Launch Complex
LIDA I
LIDA 2
54-57-15N 24-05-45E II
55-01-OON 24-14-15E II
48-51-15N 26-42-30E II
48-55-15N 26-59-OOE II
50-53-15N 25-31-OOE I
50-56-OON 25-36-15E I
50-58-30N 25-39-30E II
52-10-30N 28-34-45E I
52-15-30N 28-37-45E I
50-51-45N 28-18-15E II
50-52-15N 28-31-OOE II
52-10-15N 27-51-30E I
52-11-30N 27-48-OOE I
55-01-30N 22-23-OOE I
55-01-15N 22-11-15E I
44-01-24N 132-20-39E I
44-02-30N 132-26-26E I
39-37-45N 65-57-30E I
39-37-30N 65-57-00E I
39-35-15N 65-42-45E IV
53-47-30N 25-20-30E I
53-57-15N 25-27-45E I
NO OF PADS/
LAUNCHERS
25X1
DATE OF LATEST
PHOTOGRAPHY
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
('omplete
P' `1 Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
M M M M MMApl d F@ele~003E9 : MRD1047100~1100M M M M M
 M gMtppMd FgWIeaN003~9 : ?WDFk047jW00 100' M
25X1
25X1
25X1
O
25X
LUTSK Launch Complex
LUTSK 1
LUTSK 2
VLADIMIR-VOLYNSKIY
MARINA GORKA Launch Complex
MARINA GORKA
MAYKOP Launch Complex
KURDZHIPSKAYA
SHIRVANSKAYA
MOLOSKOVITSY Launch Complex
MOLOSKOVITSY 1
MOLOSKOVITSY 2
GURLEVO
MUKACHEVO Launch Complex
MUKACHEVOI
MUKACHEVO 2
NADVORNAYA Launch Complex
PARYSHCHE
NOVA VES
OTYNYA
OSTROG Launch Complex
OSTROG 1
OSTROG 2
OSTROV Launch Complex
A SANOVSHCHINA
SHEVELEVO
REDKINO
PAPLAKA Launch Complex
PAPLAKA1
PAPLAKA 2
PINSK Launch Complex
IVANOVO
MOTOL
NO OF PADS/
LAUNCHERS
DATE OF LATEST
PHOTOGRAPHY
50-46-45N 25-03-OOE I
50-50-30N 25-04-15E I
50-48-30N 24-42-30E IV
44-31-45N 40-00-45E II
44-25-30N 39-54-OOE IV
59-28-45N 29-06-OOE II
59-29-30N 29-12-15E II
59-25-OON 28-53-15E IV
48-18-45N 22-30-45E I
48-19-30N 22-37-15E I
48-37-45N 24-42-OOE I
48-39-30N 24-48-15E I
48-47-30N 24-50-30E IV
50-14-OON 26-43-15E I
50-17-15N 26-41-OOE I
57-31-45N 28-12-15E I
57-37-OON 28-12-15E I
57-24-30N 28-26-OOE IV
56-24-OON 21-17-30E I
56-25-OON 21-16-45E I
52-10-45N 25-41-15E I
52-12-30N 25-44-30E I
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
25`0mplete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6
 Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6
25X1
25X1
25X1
POLOTSK Launch Complex
POLOTSKI
POLOTSK 2
POSTAVY Launch Complex
POSTAVY 1
K0ZYANY
POSTAVY 2
PRUZHANY Launch Complex
PRUZHANY 1
PRUZHANY 2
RAKVERE Launch Complex
SIMUNA
VAIKE MAARJA
RISTI Launch Complex
RISTI 1
RISTI 2
RUZHANY Launch Complex
KRUPA I
KRUPA 2
SATEIKIAI Launch Complex
SALANTAI I
SALANT.AI 2
ZEMAICIU KALVARIJA
SIMFEROPOL Launch Complex
MAZANKA
VALKI
SLONIM Launch Complex
BYTEN 1
BYTEN 2
SOKAL Launch Complex
SOKAL 1
SOKAL 2
SOKAL 3
55-22-30N 28-44-30E II
55-24-15N 28-33-45E II
55-09-45N 26-53-45E II
55-20-30N 26-51-30E II
55-06-15N 27-00-15E IV
52-30-30N 24-08-45E II
52-33-30N 24-06-15E II
59-08-45N 26-26-45E II
59-11-15N 26-20-45E II
59-04-OON 24-04-30E I
59-07-45N 24-06-45E I
52-47-45N 24-42-30E II
52-49-15N 24-45-30E II
55-59-45N 21-38-15E I
56-02-15N 21-41-30E I
56-01-45N 21-54-30E IV
44-53-45N 34-20-OOE I
44-57-OON 34-26-OOE I
52-52-30N 25-21-30E I
52-55-45N 25-22-15E I
50-22-45N 24-18-15E I
50-27-15N 24-20-OOE I
50-20-15N 24-26-15E IV
NO OF PADS/
LAUNCHERS
DATE OF LATEST
PHOTOGRAPHY
25X1
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
25X1"omplete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
M M M M MMApp:d Fgele~003M 9: MRD~04 r 100~100M M r r M
 M M M M MM4ppMd FUWIeagW03 jW9 : JWDFjW047JW001001" 2 M M M
25X1
25X1
0
SOVETSK Launch Complex
SLAVSK 1
SLAVSK 2
SUCHAN Launch Complex
NOVITSKOYE
SEVERNYY SUCHAN
TAURAGE Launch Complex
TAURAGE1
TAURAGE3
TORVA Launch Complex
TORVA 1
TORVA 2
TSIRGULIINA
UGOLNYY Launch Complex
UGOLNYY
UKMERGE Launch Complex
VEPRIAI
UKMERGE
UMAN Launch Complex
MOLODETSKOYE
MANKOVKA
KISHENTSY
USOVO Launch Complex
OVRUCHI
OVRUCH 2
LIPNIKI
UZHGOROD Launch Complex
UZHGOROD
VORU Launch Complex
VORU 1
VORU 2
VSELYUB Launch Complex
VSELYUB I
VSELYUB 2
54-59-15N 21-36-30E I
54-59-45N 21-28-30E I
43-01-45N 133-17-OOE I
43-10-OON 133-20-05E I
55-10-15N 22-20-30E I
55-05-OON 22-20-OOE I
57-56-OON 26-04-OOE I
57-59-15N 26-05-OOE I
57-49-45N 26-12-30E IV
55-07-45N 24-38-30E I
55-11-OON 24-42-30E I
48-53-45N 30-27-45E I
48-57-45N 30-23-45E I
49-00-15N 30-13-45E IV
51-17-15N 28-16-15E I
51-18-30N 28-10-30E I
51-12-15N 28-26-30E II
57-46-OON 26-47-15E Ii
57-49-OO N 26-50-30E II
53-45-45N 25-43-00E I
53-48-OON 25-46-45E I
NO OF PADS/
LAUNCHERS
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757AO00300010019-6
25X1
DATE OF LATEST
PHOTOGRAPHY
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
25X1
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
 Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757AO00300010019-6
25X1
25X1
25X1
O
25)
M
YELSK Launch Complex
YELSK 1
YELSK 2
ZAGARE Launch Complex
ZAGARE 1
ZAGARE 2
LIELELEJA
ZHITOMIR Launch Complex
ZHITOMIR 1
ZHITOMIR 2
BERDICHEV
ZHMERINKA Launch Complex
GNIVAN
ZHMERIN KA
VINNITSA
ZNAMENSK Launch Complex
ZNAMENSK1
ZNAMENSK 2
51-42-30N 29-12-30E I
51-47-15N 29-18-15E I
56-23-15N 23-19-15E I
56-29-OON 23-20-45E I
56-24-30N 23-36-45E IV
50-04-45N 28-15-45E II
50-10-OON 28-16-15E II
50-05-30N 28-22-OOE II
49-09-OON 28-1l-45E II
49-10-15N 28-05-00E II
49-17-30N 28-20-15E IV
54-32-45N 21-11-15E I
54-35-15N 21-07-30E I
NO OF PADS/
LAUNCHERS
DATE OF LATEST
PHOTOGRAPHY
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
25X1
Complete
Complete
Complete
0
0
N
n
Complete
Complete
M M M MAp1d FMeleAMOO: I9 : MRD_O4i 0005 OOlm M M M M
 M*pp=d Filea)03jft9 : 2D 47 003 00'ftb = = SW
25X1
25X1
25X1
0
25
X1
Complex A
Launch Site lAl
Launch Site 1A2
Launch Site 2A1
Launch Site 2A2
Complex C
Launch Site ICI
Launch Site 1C2
Launch Site 1C3
Launch Area 2C
Launch Area 3C
Launch Site 4C1
Launch Site 4C2
Launch Site 5Ct
Launch Site 5C2
Complex E
Complex G
Complex H
BE
Number
* R&D/Trng site on first coverage
p Prototype.
Type of
Site
Number o
Positions
R&D/Trng 1
R&D -
R&D -
48-36N 46-17E Space R&D* 1
Probable Space 1
Probable Space 1
48-35N 46-17E R&D/Trng 2
48-34N 46-17E R&D/Trng 1
48-34N 46-17E Type IV -.
MRBMp
48-33N 46-17E Type IV -.
IRBM p
48-32N 46-17E Undet 2
48-32N 46-17E -- 2
48-46N 46-18E Undet 1
48-24N 46-17E Trng 2
48-48N 46-20E Undet 2
I
Site
Negated
First
Coverage
Latest
Coverage
Stage of Construction on
Last Usable Coverage
Estimated
Status
Comg5X 1 Operational
Complete Operational
Complete Operational
Inactive Inactive
Complete Operational
Complete Operational
Complete Operational
Complete Operational
Complete Operational
Complete, Undetermined
being modified
Complete Operational
Never completed Abandoned
Complete Operational
Complete Operational
Mid U/C
25
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6
 Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6
25X1
AKHTYRKA
Akhtyrka
ALUKSNE
Lejasciems
ANASTASYEVKA
An astasyevka
BARANO-ORENBURGSKOYE
Sofiye Alekseyevskoye
BELOKOROVICHI
Rudnya Zlotinskaya
BORSHCHEV
Skala Podolskaya 1
Skala Podolskaya 2
BREST
Pishcha
Z am sh any
BRODY
Yazlovchik
Stanislavchik
DERAZHNYA
Khmelnitskiy
Letichev 1
Letichev 2
DISNA
Dernovichi
Demidovo
DOLINA
Berezhnitsa
Rakuv
DYATLOVO
Ruda
Yavorskaya 1
Ruda
Yavorskaya 2
Ruda
Yavorskaya 3
Berezovka
GOMEL
Gomel 1
Gomel 2
50-19-30N 34-51-30E
57-15-15N 26-41-15E
48-32-15N 135-31-45E
44-12-OON 131-24-OOE
51-08-30N 27-59-45E
48-53-30N 026-13-30E
48-52-30N 026-16-OOE
51-35-15N 23-46-45E
51-50-05N 24-02-05E
50-05-45N 25-02-OOE
50-07-OON 24-56-30E
49-25-OON 27-06-30E
49-22-45N 27-43-45E
49-25-15N 27-45-OOE
55-47-45N 28-20-OOE
56-01-15N 28-18-45E
49-12-45N 23-57-30E
48-58-21N 24-05-35E
53-23-15N 25-10-30E
53-23-15N 25-12-45E
53-23-15N 25-13-30E
53-42-3ON 25-30-30E
52-20-45N 30-51-30E
52-24-30N 30-50-30E
25X1
NO OF LAUNCH
POSITIONS
25X1 4
25X1 4
0
M
M
M M M M ~ pplMd F~lea10031=1 9: WRDI'047I'00=1100=1 M M NO r
 M M M M MjWppMd F IeagWO3~9 : ?WD1 D47WOO 1OOVft 25" M -'
25X1
GUSEV
Tolmingkemsk
GVARDEYSK
Geroyskoye
Vvsokove
JELGAVA
Jelgava 1
Jeloava 2
JONAVA
Kaisiadorys
KA\IENETS-PODOLSKIY
Yarmolintsv
Vinkovtsv
KIVERTSY-
Kivert=v
KONKOVICHI
Novoselki 1.
Novoselki 2
KOROSTEN
Litki 1
Yemilchino 1
Yemilchino 2
Litki 2
KOZHANOVICHI
Lyudenevichi
KRASNOZNA\IENSK
Krasnoznamensk
Sudargas
KREMOVO
Manzovka
KURGANCHA
Kurgancha
LIDA
Va ilishki
LUTSK
Gorokhov
54-45-45N 21-25-15E
54-44-30N 21-33-45E
56-38-45N 23-52-45E
56-44-15N 23-55-15E
49-12-OON 26-46-45E
48-58-20N 27-12-05E
5223-OON 28-42-45E
52-25-45N 28-41-OOE
51-01-30N 28-27-45E
50-52-30N 27-53-00E
50-52-00N 27-53-00E
51-01-15N 28-24-15E
54-57-30N 22-35-00E
55-00-305 22-35-OOE
44-12-0ON 132-34-OOE
39-41-OON 65-59-OOE
58-44-00N 24-56-15E
50-35-45N 24-48-45E
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757AO00300010019-6
255X1
NO OF LAUNCH
POSITIONS
25X1
4
 Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6 25X1
25X1
0 F LAUNCH
4
25X1
M M M M WnAp1 d Frele~003_9 : MRD.047'00~100M M M r i
MARINA GORKA
Shatsk
MAYKOP
TulsKaya
May lop
MOLOSKOVITSY
Kotly 1
Kotly 2
NADVORNAYA
Ivanovtsy
OSTROG
Slavuta
Shepetovka
OSTROV
Shabany
PINSK
Lychkovtsy
POLOTSK
Plissa 1
Plissa 2
POSTAVY
Sivtsy
Bogatoyc
Kobylnik
PRUZHANY
Strigovo
Shcherby
RISTI
Kloostri
RUZHANY
Shchitno 1
Shchitno 2
49-31-15N 40-14-15E
44-33-30N 39-57-45E
59-37-45N 28-41-30E
59-39-15N 28-30-OOE
50-16-45N 26-57-45E
50-12-30N 26-59-OOE
57-23-45N 28-13-15E
52-15-OON 25-21-45E
55-12-30N 28-01-45E
55-1.1-30N 27-54-45E
55-09-30N 26-53-45E
54-57-15N 26-28-45E
54-56-30N 26-37-15E
53-23-15N 24-14-30E
52-23-OON 24-10-OOE
52-43-15N 24-58-15E
52-41-OON 24-57-30E
 _ M _Appid FMmWleqWOO339 : fftRDO47)OOVW1OOMl 24 -PP M M
25X1
0
N
25XX
;v
rn
S1TEIKIAI
Tel iai
Al.=edziai
SLONIII
B\ ten
S\IORGON
Smorgon
TAURAGE
Skaudvile
Taurage
TORVA
Valga 1
Valga 2
UKMERGE
Gel vonai
Balninkai
USOVO
Luginy
YELSK
Felak
ZAGARE
Dobele 1
Dobele 2
ZHITOMIR
Berdichev
ZH\IERINKA
Vianitsa
Bar
ZNA\IENSK
Pravdin=k
Domnovo
55-56-455 22-07-OOE
56-00-155 22-06-00E
52-54-30N 25-22-OOE
54-34-45N 26-21-30E
55-23-OON . 22-31-OOE
55-10-005 22-14-30E
57-50-15N 25-54-15E
57-55-15N 25-46-30E
55-07-15N 24-43-45E
55-13-OON 25-02-OOE
56-40-OON 23-11-45E
56-40-45N 23-06-45E
49-13-15N 28-18-45E
49-05-30N 27-43-OOE
54-23-00N 20-59-45E
54-25-30N 20-53-OOE
NO OF LAUNCH
POSITIONS
25X1 4
4
-I
25X1 0
3
1
TOTAL 312
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757AO00300010019-6
 25X1
Complex/
Site
Bayram-Ali
Bayram-Ali
Belomorsk
Ramoye
Bykhov
Sledyuki
Fedorovka
Traktovyy
Kraskino
Kraskino
Marina Gorka
Marina Gorka
Uzhgorod
Uzhgorod
Zhuravka
Zhuravka
37-46-OON 62-12-OOE III
IRBM
64-25-45N 34-18-15E III
IRBM
53-41-30N 30-20-30E II
MRBM
53-25-15N 62-23-OOE III
IRBM
42-44-OON 130-40-15E 11
1ARBIvi
53-26-30N 27-45-30E II
MRBM
45-47-lSN 133-43-30E II
MRBM
48-33-30N 22-13-15E II
MRBM
54-36-30N 76-39-45E III
IRBM
Date Msn
Msn Status
Dismantling
First Observed
25X1
Last Msn
Site Intact
2 ft arks
2 barracks-type bldgs, RIM bldg
removed; ready bldg bulldozed
destruction
confirmed on
2 barracks-type b,,ldgs^dgs & RIM RIM
bldg removed on!
bunkers between never completed
25X1
25X
Abandoned oall 25X1
structures removed; 55'~X~(`11
C-~
present 25X1 5X1
barracks-type bldgs, 1 small
bldg, & a RIM bldg removed
Abandoned on en-
trances to some bldgs ap-
pear sealed; bldgs partially
destroyed
No barracks-type bldgs seen
associated with launch area
1 barracks-type bldg & RIM
bldg removed on
bldg at
facility removed since
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6
25X1
con
M
25X1
25X1 m
25X
25X
25X1
25
M M M MAp1-d FlMele~00- 19 :~RD~04MI000M100M M M M
 ppgd FMWIeaM03~9 : tDF_47~00~009 = = = M
25X1
TABLE 9. COMPOSITION OF IRBM/MRBM COMPLEXES
O
vn
25XR
rn
Containing
Containing
Containing
Soft Sites Only
Hard Sites Only
Hard and Soft Sites
No of
Complexes
One Site, No
One
Two
Three
One
Two
Three
Two Soft,
One Soft,
One Soft,
Housing or
Site
Sites
Sites
Site
Sites
Sites
One Hard
One Hard
Two Hard
Support dU111LY
Site
Site
Sites
IRBM
3
3
2
2
5
1
5X1
4
1 1 2
MRBM
3
3
43
1
36
6
21
20
1
TOTALS
81
6 1
36
8
1 1 2
21
2
3
 Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6 25X1
a
25XM
70
rn
Initial operational
capability (IOC)
range 4/ (NRE, non-
rotating earth)
Guidance Inertial
Circular error
probability (CEP)
Initial
Improved/year
Re-entry vehicle
weight (lbs)
Warhead weight (lbs)
Gross lift-off
weight (lbs)
Configuration
Propellant
1.25 nm 1.0 nm 2.0 nm 1-2 nm 1.0 nm 0.5-1.0 nm 1.0 nm (approx)
.. _ _ n Q ...., n ec-I n 5 nm /I 968- 1 970 n R nm /1 967
3,200, ? 500 2,500-4,000
2,000, ? 300 2,000-3,200
88,000 200,000
(approx) (approx)
Single-stage Single-stage
Storable liquid Storable liquid
Table 10. Soviet ICBM, IRBM, and MRBM Systems,
Estimated Technical Characteristics and Performance
SS-5 I SS-6 I SS-7 SS-8
6,000 nm 6,000 nm
Inertial Radio inertial Inertial
Reliability rates: 8/
Alert 807, 80%
Launch 907o 8570
Improved/year
Inflight 900 90%
Improved/year
Warhead
950%
7570
950%
757,
Weapon System
Improved/year
Force
Improved/year
0
8,000, ? 1,000
3,000-4,000 6/
2,500-4,000
10,000, ? 1,000
4000-8000 N
rn
25X1
n
6,000, ? 1,000
2,400-3,200
2,000-3,200
8,000, ? 1,000
Undetermined 70
rn
500,000
(approx)
Parallel
Non-storable
300,000
(approx)
Tandem 2-stage
Storable liquid
165,000
(approx)
Tandem 2-stage
Non-storable
400,000
(approx)
Tandem 2-stage
Storable liquid
275,000
(approx)
Tandem 2-stage
Liquid 7/
-i
liquid
liquid
8070
8097,
80%
85%
85%
85%
850
85%
80QI
80%
850]0/1967
850]0/1968
85%
850
85%
90%/1967
900%/1968
9597,
95%
95%
95%
95%
7570
75%
75%
65%
65%
75%/1967
75%/1968
6070
60%
550%
557,
6557,/1967
65%/1968
_ r M Ml App"d Fv&leaW003AN9 : i&RD O47JW00- 100 = M 00
 M = = MWppNJ F lea~03A9 : . DPI47'00~001 25PIM M = M
Table 10. (Continued)
I
SS-7
1
SS-9 1/
Reaction time from
ready condition: 9/ Soft
Hard Soft
Hard
Soft
Hard
1-3
-- 1-3
-- 12 hrs
1-3
1-3
hrs
hrs
(minimum)
hrs
hrs
Condition 2 15-30
5-15 15-30
5-15 1-2 hrs
15-30
--
30-45
30-45 5-15 5-15
min
min min
min
min
min
min min min
Condition 1 5-15
3-5 5-15
3-5 1 hr
3-5
3-5
5-10
5-10 3-5 3-5
O
min
Hold time in ready
condition 1 10/ hrs-
min min
days hrs-
min (approx)
days 1 hr
min
hrs
min
days
min
1 hr
min min min
1 hr days days
days
days
(approx)(approx)
25X
R
Refire time 11/ 2-4
-- 2-4
-- 12 hrs
2-4
--
2-4
-- 25X1
7C
rn
hrs
hrs
(minimum)
hrs
hrs
--
1/ The SS-9 is believed to be intended for deployment primarily in hard sites.
2/ Tentative estimates based on limited data.
25
If intense flight testing is renewed in the immediate future. The long stand-down in the SS-10 program
(last fired II makes its role in the ICBM force uncertain.
Operational range is dependent on weight class of payload used.
It is believed that the SS-9 has an additional all-inertial guidance capability with a CEP of 1-1.5 nm.
More than one re-entry vehicle exists within these limits. Another, weighing as much as approx. 5,000 lbs
(warhead 4,000 lbs) has been tested to a reduced range (4,700 nm).
Probably a storable propellant if used as an ICBM; probably cryogenic if related to a space program.
These reliability rates may be too high since they may not sufficiently take into account the effect of Soviet
operational methods and troop training, which are at least as important as technical characteristics in deter-
mining system reliability. We have little basis for estimating these effects.
9/ Readiness Condition 3 is believed to be the normal readiness condition for missiles deployed at soft sites,
and Condition 2 for hard sites.
10/ An unfavorable environment could seriously degrade these hold times. Because of the protection afforded a
missile in a hardened site, it is given a longer hold time than its soft counterpart. We believe the cryogenic
properties of non-storable propellants probably limit these missiles to a hold time of about 1 hour.
11/ Refire capabilities are applicable to soft sites only. Estimated refire times are based on the assumption
that the launch sites were designed specifically for an efficient refire capability and that no major refurbish-
ment of ground support equipment or launch stand is necessary.
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78TO4757A000300010019-6
 Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78T04757A000300010019-6
TOP SECRET
TOP SECRET
Approved For Release 2003/12/19 : CIA-RDP78T04757A000300010019-6
1
1
1