CONTRACT INSPECTION REPORT SIMULATED IMAGERY STUDY

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: NGA Records (Formerly NIMA)
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP78B05171A000400010001-1
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: C
• Document Page Count: 2
• Document Creation Date: December 28, 2016
• Document Release Date: June 2, 2005
• Sequence Number: 1
• Publication Date: March 28, 1972
• Content Type: FORM

25X1
25X1
CO?iTR ACT i `+i. _CT i CN REPORT
3
TO: -
C
A T
U u~a
28 Laren 1 l2_
a
INSPECTION REPORT NO. (If final, so state)
ttVV
Final
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE
NAME OF CONTRACTOR
NGA review(s) completed.
-1 -1
TYPE-OF COMMODITY OR SERVICE
Simulated Imagery Study.
THE CONTRACTOR IS ON SCHEDULE
THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROBABLY REMAIN WITHIN ALLOCATED
vE
FUNDS -f] YES 0 ND IF ANSWER IS "NO' ADVISEREC -
S No
OMMENDATION AND/OR ACTION OF SPONSORING OFFICE. ON
PER CENT OF WORK COMPLETED - 10
REVERSE HEREOF. IF KNOWN. INDICATE MAGNITUDE OF AD.
DITIONAL FUNDS INVOLVED.
PER CENT OF FUNDS EXPENDED 100?f
HAS AN INTERIM REPORT. FINAL REPORT. PROTOTYPE. OR OTHER END ITEM BEEN RECEIVED FROM THE CONTRACTOR
DURING THE PERIOD? ^ YES 13 NO (If yes, give details on reverse side )
HAS GOVERNMENT-CWNEO PROPERTY BEEN DELIVERED TO CONTRACTOR DURING THIS PERIOD? a YES - I yl No
(If yes, indicate items, quantity, and cost on reverse side.) 1.01
INCENTIVES
IS THIS AN INCENTIVE CONTRACT 0 YES ]a NO
NOTE:
IF YES. CHECK TYPE
USE REVERSE SIDE FOR COMMENTS.
0 COST ^ AWARD a PERFORMANCE DELF Exe d
Q~ REPORT MUST CONTAIN INCENTIVE EVALUATION.
FEE
OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACTOR
1. D OUTSTANDING 4. ABOVE AVERAGE -7, UNSATISFACTORY
2. ^ EXCELLENT S. ^ AVERAGE
3. VERY GOOD 6? D MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE
IF OVERALL PERFORMANCEOF CONTRACTOR IS UNSATISFACTORY OR MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE INDICATE
REASONS ON REVERSE SIDE.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
0 CONTINUE AS PROGRAMMED ^ WITHHOLD PAYMENT PENDING
SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE
Q CLOSE OUT - ^ OTHER (Specify)
IF THIS IS A FINAL REPORT PUT COMMENTS ON REVERSE IN NARRATIVE FORM ON CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE
-AND CERTIFY THAT ALL DELIVERABLE ITEMS UNDER THE CONTRACT HAVE BEEN RECEIVED. THESE INCLUDE. WHERE
APPLICABLE. THE FOLLOWING,
ITEM
RECD
DOES NOT
ITEM
RECD
DOES NO
APPLY
APPLY--
PROTOTYPES
MANUALS
X
DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS
X
FINAL REPORT
X
PRODUCTION AND/OR OTHER
SPECIAL TOOLING
X
END ITEMS
X
X
OTHER GOVERNMENT PROPERTY
DATE OF LAST CONTACT WITH CONTRACTOR
28 March 1972
12R- 67 1897 0 FT v:. pproQ R7~ a E2005/06/23 : UA R E d'H1A00040064UQ0"T-"1ET
 U
NAR A !vE REPORT I ^ INTERIM ^ FIil1AL
1. During this reporting period, the decision was made to dismantle and
remove the plotter used for producing the simulated imagery. On the basis of
the limited testing which was successfully carried out,it is recommended that
the contracted computer programming work be accepted and be paid.
The contractor performed as well as he could within the constraints placed on
him by the NPIC operating environment (equipment breakdowns, computer system
changes, computer scheduling problems, etc.) The work was completed and
eventually "debugged" to the point where it would run successfully (at least
on the modes which were tried). The contractor submitted reports as required
(although often late) and responded well to technical. direction. The overall
performance of the contractor was above average.
2. The simulated imagery program was initiated to provide unclassified
test material for testing automatic correlation systems such as found on the
High Precision Stereocomparator. Because of unavoidable delays in the program,
however, the immediate requirements for the material expired. The program
may still prove useful to NPIC for other purposes, but in any case, the
routines which drive the plotter will have to be rewritten.
3. The Total Authorized Funds on this contract are
I certify that all deliverable items under this contract have been
received.
25X1
25X1
25X1
Project Officer
^ UNCLASS I
^ SECRET