LETTER TO JOHN(Sanitized)

Document Type: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP78B04770A001600010027-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 28, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 2, 2005
Sequence Number: 
27
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 4, 1966
Content Type: 
LETTER
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP78B04770A001600010027-6.pdf133.09 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2005/05/20 : CIA-RDP78BO477OA001600010027-6 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY THE ENGINEER GEODESY, INTELLIGENCE AND MAPPING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGENCY FORT BELVOIR, VIRGINIA 22060 4 April 1966 Declass Review by NGA. Reference is made to our telephone conversation on 4 April 1966, pertaining to our reply tol letter, dated 1 April 1966, subject: "Confirmation of March 29, 1966 Meeting." It is recommended that the body of our reply letter read as follows: 1. The second paragraph of your letter, dated 1 April 1966, subject: "Confirmation of March 29, 1966 Meeting." 2. Paragraphs 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3 of the purchase description for the Contact Duplicating and Reseau Printer. The Government will co-operate in any way possible to ensure that the films employed in the tests under paragraph 4.2 will be sufficiently representative of the real media to be utilized in the tests under paragraph 4.3. It is not to be construed that the Government will guarantee acceptance of the printer based on the tests under paragraph 4.2. It is suggested that this letter be forwarded tol as soon as possible in order to prevent a possible misunderstanding on the Contractor's part. 25X1 25X1 p cia rojec s rant Technical Plans & Systems Analysis Division 7 ti, a e A proved F Release205/0i/2 CIA4A78B04770A001600010027-6 Approved Foe-Release 2,005/05120Tr P781304770A00 2~4 April 1, 1966 Ref: 195/PLI-82 P. 0. Box 6788 Fort Davis Station Washington, D. C. 20020 Attention: Reference: I ((Printer #1) Subject: Confirmation of March 29, 1966 Meeting Gentlemen: presented its position that the additional exceed, principally in the area of frame edge detection, was effort above and beyond the scope of the contract. This claim was based on the general premise that had no access to the real media within which the frame edges were to be detected; nor, did the specification in the contract explicitly define the frame edge condi- tions to be accommodated. It was during the course of the contract that the Government established the 0.2 density difference as the minimum density difference which the printer would be required to sense frame edges. However, because it is impossible to demonstrate the difference between this definition, the implication in the specifica- tion, and the intent of the contract,Igreed to relinquish its claim for the additional fee applicable to those items which we consider Change In Scope. placed particular stress on the continuing problem we face in designing and testing a printer without direct access to the input film it must process and on which the printer will be tested. The inability of the Government to permit this access, and additionally, to provide samples which are equivalent of this material, has been a major source of design difficulty and program dela To circum- vent this problem, it was reaffirmed that I Iwould make up test samples representing the conditions suggested by the "This materia cor.,aiss in~ocmrtfon affecting the national defense of the united States witfiln the meaninS of the esr?e :e;6 lava, Title 18. U. S. C., sections 793 end 794, the transm?ssion ar revufation of which in air manner to an wa authorized person 1s prohibited by saw," 0, 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 Approved For Release 2005/05/20 : CIA-RDP78BO477OA001600010027-6 1 25X1 April 1, 1966 -2- Ref: 195/PLI-82 Government. It was agreed that Government representatives would examine and measure these samples to determine their validity as test media. It was agreed that the Government would certify such samples as being sufficiently represen- tative of the real media and that the Government would base its acceptance testing of the Printer on these samples. =6~ 1j8BO477OAOOO& This letter will serve also to confirm the new delivery schedule for Printer #1 established on the March 29 meeting and listed in Attachment No. 1. Yours truly, . 25X1 "This ma,er"z! cc :arrs innrr,;,;!;on a;fec,inR the r,:ional defense of the United Statcs win tho meaninS of ti :e es, c-c-c Ti[io 13, U. S. t;., Se.cfona 793 and 794, the transmission or revcta,,on of which in any manner to an wty authorized person is prohibited by law, z Approved For Release 2005/05/20 : CIA-RDP78BO477OA001600010027-6 Approved For Release 2005/05/20 : CIA-RDP78BO477OA001600010027-6 April 1, 1966 Ref: 195/PLI-82 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PRINTER 1 DELIVERY SCHEDULE AS OF MARCH 29, 1966 Test and Inspection Start May 9, 1966 Complete May 14, 1966 Final Test'Report June 14, 1966 Operator's Manual May 14, 1966 Maintenance Manual June 14, 1966 Delivery of Contact Duplicating and Reseau Printer May 20, 1966 Drawings and Documentation June 14, 1966 List of Recommended Spare Parts April 25, 1966 Delivery of Pre-view and Punch Station May 20, 1966 Approved For Release 2005/05/20 : CIA-RDP78BO477OA001600010027-6