PSF -- ANAMORPHIC SYSTEM FOR (Sanitized) HIGH-POWER STEREOVIEWER

Document Type: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP78B04770A000700010005-0
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
8
Document Creation Date: 
December 28, 2016
Document Release Date: 
November 2, 2004
Sequence Number: 
5
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 5, 1966
Content Type: 
LIST
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP78B04770A000700010005-0.pdf275.07 KB
Body: 
Appr d 7 V For Release 2004/11/30: CIA-RDP04770A000700010005-0 CON FI DETIAL 25X1 25X1 PSF -- ANAMORPHIC SYSTEM FOR HIGH-POWER STEREOVIEWER 1. There is no current project-in existence which will render this Project Suggestion unnecessary. 2. This attachment to the =High Power Stereoviewer will allow the operator to obtain differential magnification between perpend- icular axes of the optical field of this instrument. This permits stereo pairs with certain distortions to be fused by the operator. This characteristic is totally lacking in existing High Power Stereoviewers. 3. The present equipment is inadequate in that it does not permit stereoscopic fusion of imagery taken from a large angle of obliquity. 4. The existing equipment is presently totally inadequate to perform the requirement described in # 2 and 3 above. 5. The High Power Stereoviewer is used for detailed analysis; however, when the operator is studying a stereoscopic image taken from a large obliquity angle, stereoscopic fusion over a considerable area of the image is impossible. The lack of this capability detracts from the usefulness of this instrument. 6. N.A. 7. It is most definitely probably that a sufficient improvement will be made because anamorphic systems have been fabricated for other optical instruments; e.g., thelZoom 70. 8. No, there will be no changes in the characteristics of other equipment as a result of this project. 9. No other practical alternative methods are avaailable to accomplish the necessary task in a reasonable time frame. 25X1 10.1 s the estimated R&D cost. 11. The estimated time for completion of the R&D effort is 18 months from date of project assignment. 25X1 12. The first production units can be expected in two years. 13. The estimated unit cost for production quanties of this item is Declass Review by Nr proved For T P NT'e-RDP78B04770A00 Appr d For Release 2004/11/30: CIA-RDPB04770A000700010005-0 CONFIDENTIAL 14. Approximately thirty units will be required by the Center. 15. There is no known R&D effort that will decrease the value or need for this project. 16. This project will not significantly increase the maintenance cost of a High Power Stereoviewer and it will not decrease the life expectancy of a unit. Approved F Q /1 iP : CIA-RDP78BO477OA000700010005-0 Appr d For Release 2004/11/30 CIA-RDP78-B04770A0007000100Q Proof of Need for a?Project to Support a Proceed Recommendation from the Evaluation Committee, For Equipment Prototype Development. (Answers should be estimates based on previously performed tests, outside experts9opinions and experience of members of P&DS.) 1. Is there presently a project in existence which will render this,Project Suggestion unnecessary? 2. What is the performance limit of present equipment for each characteristic which is anticipated to be improved? 3. Is present equipment inadequate in any of these characteristics for present work and if so by how much? 4. Is present equipment inadequate in any of these characteristics for future work; if so by how much and what is the date for the future requirement for which present equipment will be inadequate? 5. Is it clearly a part of the Center's mission to rectify the stated inadequacy? Justify your reply by quoting from mission statements if possible. 6. Is it necessary to improve all of the characteristics listed in reply to question one but not listed as inadequate in reply to question two or three? Approved For Release 2004/11/30 : CIA-RDP78BO477OA000700010005-0 Appr d For Release 2004/11/30: CIA-RDP 04770A000700010005-0 11 f 7. Is it probable that a sufficient improvement can be made to meet the inadequacies listed in questions two or three? State the estimated numerical improvement and the source of the estimate. 8. Will there be changes in other characteristics of the equipment as a consequence of the desired improvement in some characteristics? If so, what are they. Should there be an .investigation of the possible changes, during the first phases of the project to determine if these changes in other characteristics are tolerable? 9. Are there any alternative methods of achieving the required performance improvements? List them,. state after each whether or not the alternative method should be investigated as being a possible better means. of achieving the improvement, during the early phases of the project. 10. What is the-estimated cost of the R&D effort? 11. What is the estimated time of completion of the R&D effort? 12. Approximately when would the first production unit be delivered? 13. What is the estimated cost of each production unit to the Center? 14. Approximately how, many units will be required by the Center? Approved For Release 2004/11/30 : CIA-RDP78BO477OA000700010005-0 Apprrd For Release 2004/11/30: CIA-RDPP0477OA000700010005-0 15. Is there an R&D Project or other work going on that will decrease the value or need for this project? 16. Will the project materially increase the maintenance cost or decrease the life of a unit? If so should this cost factor be investigated in early phase of the project? 17. Should the Project Suggestion become a Project? Approved For Release 2004/11/30 : CIA-RDP78BO477OA000700010005-0 ?2? Approd or e e e ZUQ4 - 04770A000700010005-0 Hasse .cation PROJECT SUGGESTION ROUTING SHEET (PSRS) a. At each numbered step a copy of the updated PSRS shall be sent to-the Designee except in steps 10 and 11. b. Use charge # ~ when working on any Project Suggestion. 1 . PSRS originated by Designee of Eval.. Coin. Chinn. on 8 April 1966 ,: Date To Eval Coin Chm f Instructions: F3. Date of review C ] Agree - Stop L.4. To Eval. Coin. Chmn. for assignment to Branch Assigned to Dev. Dr. ~ To Assigned Branch Chief for 25(1