GEMS PROGRAM; DISPOSITION OF

Document Type: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP78B04747A000700010007-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
28
Document Creation Date: 
December 28, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 29, 2002
Sequence Number: 
7
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 11, 1967
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP78B04747A000700010007-7.pdf1.07 MB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2002/06/17 : CIA-RDP78BO4747A000700010007-7 Declass Review by NIMA/DOD STATINTL NUMBER DUE DATE DATE COMPLET] M-~ease 2002/66/17 : ~~$-RDP78B04747A0007000 07-7 __ =JO - ,-- mvtTNC S Approved For Release 2006A-RDP78B04747A000700010007-7 D RAF T NPIC/TDS/D- -67 19 October 1967 SUBJECT Contract Performance Evaluation - Graded" Estimated Measuring Samples (GEMS) 1. OBJECT: To evaluate the performance achieved under the current contract covering "GEMS Development" in order to detexmiine the advisability of pursuing the project further. 2. SCOPE: This memorandum covers the correlation of the "Scope of Work" set forth in the contract with the performance realized and, the dependent extrapolation of anticipated contractor performance under any subsequent pursuit of the project. 3. SUMMARY: Based on (1) a detailed study of the contract and con- comitant documents and correspondence, (2) an interview with the presently assigned NPIC Technical Development Staff Contract Monitor, and (3) an interview with personnel in the NPIC, Technical Intelligence Division involved in the "Psychophysical GEMS Test", it is concluded that: a. With the imminnt receipt of certain reports, the present contract will have been satisfied. Approved For Release 200 AL.CLp-RDP78B04747A000700010007-7 Approved For Release 20021 Q. 4RDP78B04747A000700010007-7 b. The sought after simulation of photography at spatial frequencies up to 200 cycles per milimeter was 11 not realized. c. Performance of the contractor was characterized by delays and a certain lack of aggression. Execution of the present contract by the contractor indicates that he will be able to develop a useable set of GEMS (simulated photography at spatial frequencies approaching 200 cycles per millimeter) within about one year. It is recommended that the GEMS project be continued for the express purpose of producing a useable set of GEMS pf Pseud6 ' GEMS which include simulated photography at spatial frequencies up to at least 180 cycles per millimeter. 4. HISTORY: In early 1964, the began active 25X1A pursuit of the initial "GEMS Development" This resulted 2~* in some simulations of aerial photography, wherein the photographic parameters of exposure, haze, granularity, and modulation transfer function were varied experimentally. Work under the above mentioned contract, which terminated in mid 1965, was directly related to a previous effort known variously as the "Photographic Image Simulation Program". A commentary on the work performed under this previous effort and the initial "GEMS Development" contract was given in a "Report on the Image Quality Evaluation Program, July 196, prepared by our I Included in this commentary Approved For Release 2002/06/17 : CIA-RDP78BO4747A000700010007-7 SEC tT Approved For Release 2002/&E1? ATRDP78B04747A000700010007-7 were cetain recommendations relative to continuation of "GEMS Develop- ment". Expanding on the recommendations contained in the "Report on the Image Quality Evaluation Program, July 1965", 25X1A submitted a proposal for further work on "GEMS Development". This proposal 25X1A On 9 February 1966, a contract was offered to the under which they would provide all of the manpower, facilities, services, and materials required to accomplish the GEMS Development Program described 25X1A 25X1A acknowledged and accepted by the contractor on 21 February 1966. The estimated cost of performance (exclusive of the fixed fee) was The fixed fee for performance was The period of performance expiration date was stipulated as 30 June 1967. Verbal authorization to proceed with this contract was apparently given on or about 10 January 1966. Basically, the proposed program consisted of four tasks: a. GEMS Specification Study b. Alternate GEMS Fabrication Technique c. GEMS Viewer Study d. GEMS Matrix Fabrication Approved For Release 2002/06/17 : CIA-RDP78B04747A000700010007-7 25X1A 25X1A ` (,`LI Approved For Release 2002/06S #Q El DP78B04747A000700010007-7 A fifth task was delineated, which involved preparing specifications, estimated fabrication costs, and a fabrication cycle for the GEMS Viewer. Included in the GEMS Specification Study was a provision for a psychophysical testing program to be conducted by a subcontractor, utilizing NPIC personnel. Conclusions reached early in the "GEMS Development" program indicated that a GEMS matrix should consist of about 1000 to 1500 distinct GEMS. Con- tinuing study by the contractor resulted in the development of a theoretical technique which would eliminate the need for such a large GEMS matrix, reducing the required number to about 10. This technique, although appearing to be technically sound, had not been investigated experimentally On 8 November 1966, an amendment to the master contract was offered was acknowledged and accepted by the contractor on 17 November necessary to set up a "Psuedo-GEMS Breadboard" and undertake experiments therewith in accordance with their proposal MW-M-1536, dated 1 September 1966. This offer, designated Amendment No. 1, Task Order No. 8, Contract 1966. The estimated cost of performance (exclusive of the fixed fee) was 0 under which they would perform all work The fixed fee for performance was increased to All other term" 'conditions, and requirements of Task Order No. 8 remained unchanged. 25X1A Approved For Release 2002/06/17 : CIA-RDP78B04747A000700010007-7 Approved For Release 204REfA-RDP78B04747A000700010007-7 Promising results from the Pseudo-GEMS investigation plus certain ..a technical problems encountered in the= =work prompted the contractor to submit a "Propos, 1 Change-in-Scope for the GEMS Study Effort" dated 6 January 1967. Accordingly, on 16 March 1967, an amendment to the master contract under which they would re- direct their efforts in the performance of the Task Order in accordance I Change-in- with their proposal dated 6 January 1967, entitled "/ropos 17"" cope for GEMS Study Effort". This offer, designated Amendment No. 2, Task Order No. 8,1 was acknowledged and accepted by the contractor on 28 March 1967. The period of performance expiration date was extended from 30 June 1967 to 30 September 1967. All other terms, conditions, and requirements of Task Order No. 8, as amended, remained unchanged. 5. CONTRACT SCOPE OF WORK: Under Task Order No. 8, Contract No. accepted by the contractor on 21 February 1966, agreed to provide all of the manpower, facilities, services and materials required to accomplish the program described in Section 3.0 of their proposal with the following exception: "Such psychophysical experiments and tests as are required shall be performed at the customer's facility with the assistance of the customer's personnel. 0 0 shall provide for the supervision of these experi- ments and tests by mdans of a,pubcontract with II 25X1A 25X1A 25X1A Approved For Release 20021P6/17 : CIA-RDP78B04747A000700010007-7 Approved For Release 2002/06/17SCL~8B04747A000700010007-7 The specific objectives and deliverable material included in the program, described in Section 3.0 of the contractor's proposal were: Item #1. Preparation of a two dimensional GEMS matrix wherein a, modulation transfer function is varied against exposure. Item #2. Performance of a psychological test with the-objective of jaling the matrix elements in psychologically equal intervals among modulation transfer function and exposuree Item #2a Application of the staled matrix to the assessment of mission photography to determine the extent to which the tent to which individuals agree with one another. Item #2b Repeat application of the s/aled matrix as described under Z a. item #14, utilizing additional GEMS in place of mission photography the objective being to establish accuracy Item #2c Prepare a final report on results of psychological tests (scheduled for delivery in October 1966). Item #3. Conduct a study toward refining existing simulation techniques, by determining the precision with which d,,of the image ZA4V quality parameters i