MISSION 1031 PHOTOGRAPHIC EVALUATION INTERIM REPORT (PEIR)

Document Type: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP78B04558A001200040013-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
6
Document Creation Date: 
December 28, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 26, 2008
Sequence Number: 
13
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 28, 1966
Content Type: 
CABLE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP78B04558A001200040013-1.pdf223.97 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2008/03/26: CIA-RDP78BO4558AO01200040013-1 I OUT58358 T O P S E C R El 281522Z 15 4~Z 33 REF: SUBJ: MISSION 1031 PHOTOGRAPHIC EVALUATION INTERIM REPORT (PEIR) 1. NUMERICAL SUMMARY MSN NO AND DATES: 1031-1, 7-14 APRIL 1966 1031-2, 15-18 APRIL 1966 LAUNCH DATE AND TIME: 7 APRIL 1966/22 03Z VEHICLE NUMBER : 162 7 CAMERA SYSTEM: J-30 PAN CAMERA NOS: FWD-LOOKING (MASTER) 184 AFT-LOOKING (SLAVE) 185 S/I CAMERA NOS: MSN 1031-1: D93/101/99 MSN 1031-2: D86/106/86 RECOVERY REVS: D113 AND D177 2. CAMERA SETTINGS 2 8 APR 1966 Advance WAY Sanitized FWD-LOOKING: 0.225 INCH SLIT, WRATTEN 23A FILTER AFT-LOOKING: 0.150 INCH SLIT, WRATTEN 21 FILTER 3. PERFORMANCE SUMMARY A. THE OVERALL QUALITY OF THIS MISSION IS CONSIDERED TO BE BETTER THAN MISSION 1030. CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THE MISSION pup SECRET 25X1 m :9 I t. A~tiadia~ 1979 ~' ft!Lat'st1 Approved For Release 2008/03/26: CIA-RDP78BO4558AO01200040013-1 Approved For Release 2008/03/26: CIA-RDP78B04558A001200040013-1 ? ARE AS GOOD AS ANY OBSERVED IN RECENT MISSIONS. THERE WAS, HOWEVER, AN OVERALL REDUCTION IN QUALITY DUE TO ATMOSPHERIC CONDITIONS. THE GENERAL EFFECT OF ATMOSPHERICS ON 1031 IS CONSIDERED TO BE AS SEVERE AS WITH 1030. THIS CONDITION IS DISCUSSED FURTHER IN PARA 5, COMMENTS. B. ONLY ONE RESOLUTION TARGET WAS IMAGED. THIS HIGH CONTRAST TARGET, COVERED UNDER POOR WEATHER CONDITIONS BY THE FWD CAMERA, INDICATED ALONG TRACK (IMC) RESOLUTION VALUE FEET AND CROSS TRACK (SCAN) RESOLUTION VALUES IN GENERAL, THE IMAGE QUALITY OF THE FWD-LOOKING PAN CAMERA WAS CONSIDERED, BY BOTH THE PI'S AND THE PET TEAM, TO BE BETTER THAN THE AFT-LOOKING CAMERA. THE FWD-LOOKING CAMERA IMAGE QUALITY ON 1031 WAS CONSIDERED BETTER THAN FWD CAMERAS FROM OTHER RECENT MISSIONS. 4. ANOMALIES ANOMALIES INCLUDING THOSE. REPORTED IN THE 31 MESSAGES (REF A AND B) WERE REVIEWED. A. NO AFT-LOOKING CAMERA FILM RETURNED ON MISSION 1031-2. CAUSE: UNKNOWN. THERE IS NO INDICATION OF ANY ANOMALIES ON MISSION FILM THAT CAN BE ATTRIBUTED TO THIS FAILURE, NOR DOES AN EXAMINATION OF THE DATA AVAILABLE TO THE PET SHED ANY FURTHER LIGHT ON THE CAUSE OF THE FAILURE. ACTION: CONTINUE INVESTIGATION (MONITOR: B. SCRATCHING ON AFT-LOOKING CAMERA FILM. 25X1 25X1 1 Approved For Release 2008/03/26: CIA-RDP78B04558A001200040013-1 Approved For Release 2008/03/26: CIA-RDP78BO4558AO01200040013-1 ? CAUSE: PROBABLE INTERFERENCE OF THE FILM CHUTE IN 1031-1 RECOVERY SYSTEM. ACTION: FUTURE FILM CHUTES HAVE BEEN DESIGNED WITH ADDITIONAL CLEARANCE AND IMPROVED ASSEMBLY TECHNIQUES. NO FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED. C. ABNORMAL IMAGE QUALITY FALL-OFF AT FORMAT EDGE ON 1031-2 INDEX. CAUSE: APPARENT ERROR IN POSITIONING OF FOCAL PLANE FOR MAXIMUM AWAR. ACTION: EXAMINE FOCUS SETTING CRITERION (MONITOR: D. VEILING OF STARBOARD HORIZON CAMERA IMAGERY. CAUSE: UNKNOWN. ACTION: AWAITING CORRELARY DATA FROM GEMINI MISSIONS AND EXAMINATION OF MISSION 1032 MATERIAL WHICH WILL BE A NOSE FORWARD FLIGHT E. STELLAR CAMERA SHUTTER MALFUNCTION; INTERMITTENT DELAY IN SHUTTER CLOSING. CAUSE: EXCESSIVE INTERNAL FRICTION IN SHUTTER. ACTION: INVESTIGATION UNDER WAY USING STRONGER SHUTTER CLOSING SPRING F. SERIOUSLY FOGGED FILM ON LAST 13 INCHES OF BOTH STELLAR /INDEX CAMERAS. CAUSE: PROBABLY CAUSED BY CRACKING OF FIBERGLASS Approved For Release 2008/03/26: CIA-RDP78BO4558AO01200040013-1 Approved For Release 2008/03/26: CIA-RDP78BO4558AO01200040013-1 0 ? RECOVERY CAPSULE COVER. ACTION: EXAMINE DRAWINGS AND MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES TO DETERMINE CAUSE OF FAILURE G. SEVERE FLARE OVER STELLAR IMAGERY ON MISSION 1031-2. CAUSE: UNKNOWN. ACTION: UNDER INVESTIGATION H. CHARACTERISTIC ANOMALIES THERE ARE CERTAIN CHARACTERISTIC ANOMALIES THAT ARE CONSIDERED INHERENT TO THE OPERATION OF THE CORONA SYSTEM. WHILE THESE ITEMS WARRANT ATTENTION TO PREVENT FURTHER DEGRADATION, IT IS NOT FELT THAT SPECIFIC ACTION ITEMS SHOULD BE ASSIGNED. A SUMMARY OF THESE ITEMS AND THE DEGREE OF DEGRADATION IS PRESENTED BELOW. (1) SCRATCHES IN THE FORMAT OF THE AFT-LOOKING CAMERA WERE GREATER THAN NORMAL (SEE B ABOVE). SCRATCHES IN THE FORMAT OF THE FORWARD-LOOKING CAMERA WERE NORMAL. (2) RAIL SCRATCHES FROM BOTH PAN CAMERAS WERE NORMAL. (3) RAGGED FORMAT EDGES FROM SCRAPED EMULSION WERE LESS THAN NORMAL. (4) STATIC DISCHARGE ALONG THE EDGES OF BOTH PAN CAMERA FILMS WAS LESS THAN NORMAL. (5) LIGHT LEAKS AFFECTING BOTH PAN CAMERA FILMS WERE LESS THAN NORMAL. THE LIGHT LEAKS NORMALLY PRESENT FROM THE -1 ABLATIVE SHELL WERE NOT PRESENT ON THIS MISSION 1 Approved For Release 2008/03/26: CIA-RDP78BO4558AO01200040013-1 Approved For Release 2008/03/26: CIA-RDP78BO4558AO01200040013-1 DUE TO THE INCORPORATION OF THE FILM CHUTE. (6) MULTI-DIRECTIONAL, PLUS DENSITY STREAKS APPEARED IN THE FIRST SEVERAL FRAMES OF STELLAR CAMERA FILM. THIS CONDITION IS NORMAL. 5. COMMENTS A. FOR THE FIRST TIME A WRATTEN 23A FILTER WAS USED IN THE FWD-LOOKING CAMERA. THIS WAS USED WITH A NARROWER (0.225 INCH) SLIT. IT IS FELT THAT THE RESULTING IMAGE QUALITY WAS SLIGHTLY BETTER THAN NORMALLY ACQUIRED WITH THE FORWARD-LOOKING CAMERA. B. AN ANALYSIS OF THE INDEX CAMERA MATERIAL WAS MADE FOR SNOW AND ATMOSPHERICS. IN THIS ANALYSIS THE NUMBER OF CLEAR TERRAIN FRAMES WERE NOTED. THE DATA BELOW CLEARLY ILLUSTRATES THE LOW PERCENTAGE OF CLEAR TERRAIN INDEX FRAMES OBSERVED. (1) MSN 1031-1 (TOTAL INDEX FRAMES 419) TOTAL CLEAR TERRAIN FRAMES - 33 OR 8 PER CENT TOTAL CLEAR AND SNOW FRAMES - 63 OR 16 PER CENT (2) MSN 1031-2 (TOTAL INDEX FRAMES 426) TOTAL CLEAR TERRAIN FRAMES - 24 OR 6 PER CENT TOTAL CLEAR AND SNOW FRAMES - 91 OR 21 PER CENT C. THE MINIMUM DENSITY VALUES RECORDED WERE GOOD. SOME MAXIMUM DENSITY VALUES WERE HIGH, WITH MOST OF THESE OCCURRING IN SNOW COVERED AREAS. CALCULATED LUMINANCE VALUES 1 Approved For Release 2008/03/26: CIA-RDP78BO4558AO01200040013-1 Approved For Release 2008/03/26: CIA-RDP78B04558A001200040013-1 0 -6 ? WERE HIGHER THAN NORMAL WITH SNOW COVER AND ATMOSPHERICS AFFECTING THESE VALUES. D. THERE WAS A LOW GAMMA TEST RUN ON MISSION 1030-1. THE PET TEAM CONCURS WITH THE PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS CONDUCTED AT 4081 NOT SENT TO AND AGREES THAT FURTHER TESTING IS WARRANTED. THE CAMERA PROGRAMS OF FUTURE MISSIONS SHOULD INCLUDE THE NECESSARY ENGINEERING OPERATIONS FOR THE ACQUISITIONS OF SUITABLE TEST MATERIALS. A TEST PLAN WILL BE PREPARED BY THE PET TEAM. T 0 P S E C R E T END OF MESSAGE Approved For Release 2008/03/26: CIA-RDP78B04558A001200040013-1