CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR SELECTION OF CS OFFICERS FOR ASSIGNMENT TO OTR AND INSTRUCTIONS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP78-06369A000100090001-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
5
Document Creation Date: 
November 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 3, 2000
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 8, 1968
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP78-06369A000100090001-8.pdf273.3 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 04/17 : CIA-RQP7$.-0636900010001-8 -~) il/S //_ C4/a DD '? r; d MEMORANDUM FOR: The Deputy Director, for Plans SUBJECT Criteria and Standards for Selection of CS Officers for Assignwent to OTR as Instructors REFERENCE 25X1 A . u sec : Assignment of CS Officers to Instructor Positions in OTR assignment of CS officers to instructor positions in GTA 1. This mem randu. a proposes criteria and standards for selection and assignment of Clandestine Services (CS)' officers to GTA and requests approval by the Deputy Director for Plans in paragraph 3 below. 2. Referent ~ establishes the CS/OTR Subcommittee, of the CS Personnel Management Co;axmlttee. Paragraph 3 of referent M states,. "Tilie subcommittee will develop and recommend to Deputy . Director for Plans for approval, criteria and standards for assizSmsent of CS officers to instructor positions in OTRII. In fulfillment of this directive, the CS/OTR Subcoiamittee'of the CS Personnel 1aaiaagc:aent Committee subra:~ vs the criteria for selection and as set forth in attachuent hereto. 3. It is recoramendeu that tl:io Deputy Director for Plans approve the selection criteria and standards cited in attachment as policy for CS personnel staffing of GTR. instructor requirements. 25X1A Chairman, CS/0T; Subcommittee for Selection of CS officers to be Assigned to OTR CF Approved For Release 2000/04/17 : A-1 bP78-06369A000100090001-8 Approved For Release 2864/17 : CIA-koR6T69A00010001-8 SUBJECT: Criteria and Standards for Selection of CS Officers for Assign lent to OTB. as Instructors COORMaMON: John S. Richardson Director of Training R. L. r' .nerman 3ut~~ Director for Sup;zt 2?ROVAL: ' a u~A. fA..-rrti( W'/~ dl uK .et ~j~ u L~. ~~%44mi1~ a.ww.r~~iMVrM~- T'~:uaa i~IQ r?e~~iae Deputy Director Zr Ps IUD/S' Dlztrion: Ori &.1 - 2 - C/Al? Division I - DD/S Subject 1 - Iii?/S chroj o Approved For Release 2000/04/17 : CIA-RDP78-06369A000100090001-8 6 JAN 1963 Date SEC RE Approved For Release 2AO'AI'64/17 : CIA-FAD.P784 0.6,369A0001000#iQW -8 ATTACXJENT A. General Criteria 25X1A 1. Selection of Former Career Trainees. Approximately lv years of experience in tae ILUndestine 6ervicos. Hope- fully, 15-2u per cent of the total number of the officers selected for operations training would be CTs. Thus, out of g total of 25 nominations, 4 or 5 would be in this category. 2.. M4idcareer Officers. Four or five of the total number should e officers who either have completed the !idcaroer Executive Development Course or who actually have been designated as Mideareer Officers. 3. Potential Chief of Station Designees. One or two officers wixo in then near future may reasonably be expected to be named as Chiefs-of-station should be included in the nominee group. 4. Promotion Status. Where possible, an effort will be made to maintain a reasonable relationship between ae and grade of potential CS instructors in grade GS-14 and under who have been prc:,oted in the last six years. however, $ t is appreciates; there is a significant number of grade G3-13 and GS-14 officers of excellent operational reputat: on, who feet all basic requirements for advancement, but have been delayed as a result of position quotas .ffectitig advancement in. these grades. Further, due to the present bulge in the higher grades in the Agency, which is expected to disappear within the next few years due to ret,irewents there may be rioro GS-15s available than would normally be the case and certain of these may have to fill OTffr slots in Personal Rank Assignments. 5. Fitness Reports. CS officers assigned to -OTR should have an over-411 fitness repo ?t rating of "Strong". however, it is recognized that soi2e rating officers are more demanding than others, hence there will be occasions %vaere a strong officer will receive a ratin of proficient, in which c.ses careful attention will be paid to the narra- tive comments of the rating officer. Approved For Release 200b/04/1 7 (A- [3P78-06369A000100090001-8 approved For l elease t ib4/17 : CIA-RDP78-06369A000100b&69$1-8 25X1A 25X1 C 25X1 C 25X1A 25X1A 6. Special Factors. No officer, possibly for some years to cor.,o, should be no aina.ted to CKIR following completion of an unsatisfactory tour or the commission of a serious "flap" for which the officer was clearly responsible. L. Criteria for Assignment 1. Grades. Predominantly officers in grades GS-13 ahd GS-?1 hough a few officers at the GS-15 lave are acceptabie. Experience. Case oAfieei? background with sub- stamtxal a;exat--iz~endli.n experi nc:o, ,. ~'~ f'--L' 4. Writing-Speaking Skills. Prof:uciency satisfactory for classroom xastruc 6ZZx ro uirc.-monts. 5. Health. Full-duty general. No limitations which would significantly affect ability to carry a normal workload that includes participation in field training c:.ercises. While the CS will not assign officers to who are unable physically to carry a full workload, there may be instances where an operationally co-4.1actent and capable officer may be considered for an assignment, though temporarily denied an overseas assignment due to a phy : ,cal condition or where overseas is ruled out due to as absence of special medical facilities for the officer concerned or a member of his immediate family. 25X1A C. Criteria for Assignment to Headquarte.. a Training Branches 1. Grades. Unlike a higher proportion of more senior r!fleers at the and GS-15 levels is preferred. Approved For Release 2000/04/17 : CIA-RDP78-06369A000100090001-8 Approved For Release 2 4/17: CIA-RDP78-06369A0001006WQ61-1-8 2. Health and Mobility. Full-duty general. Frequent travel and~'iDY abroad required. 3. Foreign Langua?e. Not less than intermediate level capability, ,articularlf in the world languages--Spanish, French, Portuguese. German, Russian, and Arabic are also most desirable. This requirement does not apply to all nominees since some officers without language skills can be used in Covert Training. Foreign languages, are not required for assignment to the rd;oadquarters Training Branch. Approved For Release 2000/04/17 : CIA-RDP78-06369A000100090001-8