(Sanitized)RECD TDY REPORT (Sanitized) SEPT 66 - 15 JAN 67(Sanitized)

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP78-05601A000100250004-9
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 18
• Document Creation Date: December 9, 2016
• Document Release Date: August 9, 2000
• Sequence Number: 4
• Publication Date: November 15, 1967
• Content Type: PERRPT

Approved For Release gat:11/03/03 : CIA-RDP78-05601A000100250004-9
*411b.
BROD TIM =POW
f3eirt 66 - Jim 67
25X1A2g
25X1A2g
25X1A9a
Approved For Release 2001/Mafel1a6OP78-05601A000100250004-9
Approved For Release 20,01/03/03 : CIA-RDP78-05601A004100250004-9
25X1C4e
41,41104,44T
warns
=MARY
1. Engineering Problems
1.1 Drawings
1.2 Specifications
1.3 GPM
2. Change Orders
2.1 Gpper Comp
2.2 Lower Camp
3. Pield Support
3.1 Station
3.2 Base
3.3
4. Contractor Evaluation
4.1 Personnel
4.2 Workmanship
4.3 Financial Resources
4.4 Crganization
5. Field Criticism of the Construction Project
5.1 Project Management
5.2 Construction Commitments
Recommendations
6.1 Technical
6.2 Managerial
Appendix
A. LettetAILL1 Sept 1966 to
25X1A2g froillIllIl Site Engineer, subject:
Preliminary Drawings.
B. Summary of Lower Capp Change Orde
Lower
Approved For Release 2001/03/03 : CIA-RDP78-05601A000100250004-9
25X1C4e
25X1A2g
Approved For Release2001/03/03 : CIA-RDP78-05601AGI00100250004-9
SECRET
SUMMARY
Delayed and damaged QPM, and a breakdown in communicationS between
Headquarters and the COB were the most eignificant problems encountered
during the course of thip TDY. The 'delved OM set the rate of the job
and prevented earlier coepletion. The breakdown in communications
between Headquarters and the COB resulted in a negative climate which
definitely influenced the COB'; conduct towards those who represented
the Headquarters element. AlthoUgh this report blem areas,
it is not intended to dieinish the fact that the construe- 25X1A2g
tion is rapidly nearing completion under what have been extremely
difficult field conditions.
Reeommendations at the end of this report suggest means of
eliminating the aforementioned and other problems by establishing
procedures which insure greater Supply Division project participation,
designate permanent "project engineers", and call for the establish-
25X1A2g ma of direct Contractor relationships. It should be noted
that these Recommendations are based on field observations which to
some degree may be altered by Headquarters considerations unknown to
this writer.
Approved For Release 2001/03/Q3 ? q14-NP78-05601A000100250004-9
Approved For Release 2401/03/03 : CIA-RDP78-05601A000100250004-9
125X1C4e
SECRET
Problems
1.1 Drawing*
The construction drawings were, for
the most part, a e actory. However, in several critical areas,
they were somewhat lacking in detail, incorrect, and incomplete.
The Upper Camp Operations Building air conditioning drawl
r.
ILmaigimilidomewhat lafilleg.in detail. The Contractor
and the ...Mate Engineer were unable to determine
1.1.,?gtioning Piping layout from this drawing. It should be
pointed out that a person with U.S. equivalent air conditioning
experience would probably have been able to devise and install a suit-
able air conditioning piping viten% without detailed drawings. However,
the Upper Camp Specifications only stipulated that "...the install.ation
shall be accomplished by workmen skilled in thia type of k..."1
The COntractor's position generally supported by was that
he would provide people skilled, by local standards in the all:sal
installation of tha,air conditioning piping, but t this did not
mean that these persons must be able to devise a suitable piping
system. The impasse was resolved when a Electrical Engineer
then at the site agreed to supervise the complete powerhouee inatalla-
Um while the Contractor would commission a European air conditioning
master to devise and install a suitable air conditioning piping system.
In several areas the manufacturers as well as the contract
drawings were incorrect. The pelletiser perma-valk drawings, for
example, were impossible to follow because the drawings were obviously
drawn for a type of pelletizer other than that provided. In the end,
these drawings were discarded and the perma-valk WAS completely
reconstructed. In other instances, the drawings were incorrect in that
they specified items to be a47.44 which were Contractor-furnished, and
other items to be Contractor-furnished, which were OFM.3
3-Section
1S-07, AIR CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT) Specifications for
Upper Camp Paciljtjes, May 1966.
20enerator Anchor Bolts, Upper Camp
**tor Pool Fuel Pump, laver Camp
3Uhit Heater Ilia Pump, Lower Camp
SECRET
Approved For Release 2001/03/03 : CIA-RDP78-05601A000100250004-9
25X1C4e
25X1C4e
25X1A2g
25X1A2g
25X1A2g
25X1A2g
Approved For Relew 2001/03/03 : CIA-RDP78-05604000100250004-9
SECRET
The most serious 9robi.rte with the drawings, however,
resulted from the fact ttat they were incomplete. Although
V$ advised, in writing,more than a month prior to the signing of
the Lower Cam contract thai seven drawings had beeenmitted,
they failed to inplude these drawings in the final contract drawings.
In fact, the omitted drawings had still not been provided three
menthe later tree-tor was forced to use unofficial drawings
rovided by the Site Engineer.
1.2 Specifications
The specification; were semetimes unclear as to responsi-
occasionally wrong, and often unrealistic. As e. result,
generally ignored by and the
Engineer. An effort vas made by all concerned to provide
ontidered by the boyernment Representatives to le good
practice under the existing field conditions.
The lack of clarity of the specifications is best illustrated
by the following examples. In eonnection With the Upper Camp air
conditioning the Contractor was requested by the Site Engineer
to balance the System and conduct a perforMance Cheek. The Contractor
at first refUsed to perform these operations based on the argument
that the specifications did not require it. ln fact, neither Specifi-
cation M2-13, AIR BALANCING, or M2-16, PERPORMANCE, of the Upper Camp
Specifications stipulate that the Contractor shall perform these
operations. in the end, the ContraCtor did decide to balance the
system and conduct a performance test.
in another instance au attempt was made to get the COntractor
to operationally test the Upper Camp generators. The Contractor
reflood to take ally respons.bi1ity for the operation of theie units
again barged on the argonaut that the specifications did nat require
him to do so and because heron he could not assume any reeponsibility
formistakes whiCh may have occurred at the factor/. Pneoirication
13, GENERATING =TS, DUsX,PZECISItCs Upper Camp Specifications, refers
only to the "installation" and not the "operlii2a1 testing" of the
generating units. ftrtunately, there was aElectrical Engineer
A.
SECRET
Approved For Release 2001/03/03 : CIA-RDP78-05601A000100250004-9
25X1C4e
25X1C4e
25X1A2g
25X1A2g
25X1C4e
25X1A
Approved For Re!eau 2001/03/03 : CIA-RDP78-05601.A000100250004-9
SECRET
at the site at the time vho we able to correct factory errors vhieh
actually did exist in the 4rin of the generators.
X n some cases the specifications were simpiy wrong as with
Specification C-4, FENCE, CHAIN LINE, Lower Camp Specifications for
the "...erection of Government-furnished chain-link fence, complete..."
Although this fence was neither intended to be OFM nor was it
included in the list of OFM, the Contractor simply stated that since
the specification referred to it as GPM, and the drawings did not
contradict this he assumed it ws Oaf. In the end the fence was
purchased by th; Government.
In many cases the specific tions yore simply unrealistic.
FOr example; Lover Camp Specification 3P-0081 SHOP DRAWINGS, requires
that theContractor sUbmit phop draVings on GPM; Lover CanT PPenifica-
tion S145, (=CRETE) SAMPLES AND TEST res that the
Contractor provide test Wlinders vtion no teat lab exigted in
the country for testing them; Lower Camp Specification Sl, CONCRETE,
and 0-3, STASELTZED-AOGROGATE BASE COURSE, re quire aggregate grada-
tions 'Mita the Contractor could not possibly have met using the local
river gravel he had been given . =Iasi= to use; and Lover Camp
Specification E3, GENERATING ta So DIESEL ELECTRIC CLEANING AND
PUNTING 02' UNTERGROGND TANKS, requires that the unlerground tanks, be
coated with coal-tar enamel even thOugh the Contractor *bates that he
ttlIlat the time the 'pacification was written that coal-tar
s not be obtained in the country and that be had DO inten-
tion for coal-tar enamel and rUbstituted cut-back asphalt.
25X1C4e
1.3 Gover13ment-F4rnished Materials
Most materials, with the exception Of the pa etiex units,
.zrivad at the site in good condition. However, the rate et progress
of the job was constantly set by the rate of arrival of the OFM.
Most mechanical and electricel items arrived in good
condition. However, one trWafOrMer WAS 44MAtled 433d the air conditioning
arrived with all of the mechanical linkages loose.
7b.s.1 in particular, arrived in excellent
condition. This resulted primarily from the fact that all member*
were packed with heavy timbers and angle tron covers on all corners.
Minor erection difficulties were encountered in that all Darts were
met good :matches and it was necessary to use a cutting torch on maDY
holes and some lengths.
SECRET
Approved For Release 2001/03/03 : CIA-RDP78-05601A000100250004-9
Approved For Releate 2001/03/03 : CIA-RDP78-05601 000100250004-9
SECRET
audition of the palletiser units on the other hand WA
fair and in the case of the erected units, deplorable.
for example, had to be completely reconstructed. The
h car vas so completely damaeed that it required 200
onsiderable cost to repair it. The interior Stalls of
ere completely broken out, pipes were broken, the
tntertQr wall covering vas ripped, and the water cloeets were broken.
The unit vas eo constructed that repairs were very difficult to)make,
i.e., mastic sealed plastic sewer pipe and inaccessible aoldered water
pipe connections. Most of this dame reoulted from the fact that there
was ga Peeking of the erected units. the Lower Capp units, with the
exoegion of the erected units, were not severely damaged. Bowever,
at least one-third of the units suffered Same water damage reaulting
in loose and broken linoleum. These units also suffered some damage
to the exposed panel corners resulting from the inadequate packing
in 1/4.inch plywood
lbs rate of progrese of the job waa constantly set by the
rate of arrival of the GPM. Per exemple: from 19 September 1966 to
18 October 1966 the Contractor was deleyed awaiting the arrival of
the Operations Building Solex Lights, eppremimately 50 meters of
chain-link fence, the water pumps and preseure tank*, and the power
house unit heater; from 16 Deceither 1966 until 9 January 1967 the
Contractor vas delayed on the Lower Camp wiring installation because
the GPM vire had not arrived; and from 7 January 1967 until at least
15 January 1967 the Contractor vas delayed on the palletizer erection
because the OM fasteners, flashing, and the eqpipment had not arrived.
2. Change Orders
Change orders were Lsued. either out of engineering nece5aity
or because there was a need for facilities over end above those aUed
for in the basic contract. During the period of this TDY no change
order requested by the COB vas ever refused.
2.1 Upper Camp
7ba final number of change orders was between ko end 50.
The exact number is unknown since no formal procedure existed for
itemising and controlling these work items.
2.2 Lover Camp
Drizgthe period of this TD!, twenty-six change orders were
25X1C4e issued to A rigid procedure for issuing these chm:momm
orders was oUowed in each case. Once it was agreed by the 25X1A2g
Site Engineer and the COB that a change order was neceury1 tmal
signed document was prepared and given to 25X1C4e
Approved For Release 2001/93iO3 itili-RDP78-05601A000100250004-9
5X1C4e
5X1A
Approved For Re!eau 2001/03/03 : CIA-RDP78-056014000100250004-9
SHCRET
This document included a chaege order number, dec'j.tjye title, verbal
description gpplicable gpecifications, and au engineering sketch. A
$ummary Of the Lower Capp change orders issued to is given
in Appendix B.
In addition to the above twenty-six change orders, four
Mr.Vairrig Jointed and administered directly by the
These ehanego orders were for: (1) construc-
tion of an indisenoue toilet in the Industrial Area; (2) inStallation
of interior partitions, interior electrical work, nod heating units
in the Buildings; (3) installatioa of interior palletizer
plembing; and construction of a co line from the Upper to the
Lower Cagp.
3 Field Swop
3.1 Station
The Station logistical support was very good. The Log
obtained all materiels that were requested and delivered them
site vitas, the time limits epecified. (Won* occasion he wee
able to completely fabricate and deliver to the site several hundred
anchor bolts of widely different sizes in leas than five days.
3.2 Buie
A large amount of material eepport, including gelvanized
antenna hardware and special tools ehich were not available in the
country, vas provided by the Base. Durieg Ulmer Capp construction
this MilltCrial 145 provided only with the greatest reluctance and
solicitude. However, during Lower Camp construction the situation
improved and all requested support WAI freely provided.
25X1C4e 3.3
25X1C4e
were cepable and the inspection
provid was good. In several instances, these representutives
suggested valuable engineering changes which were incorporated by
change order.
25X1C4e
On the other hand, support provided by the District Office
was very poor. 'Or example, although the Chief of the 4Iet*ict Construc-
tion Branch wee informed, in eritiug,5 as early as 11 September 1966
58es Appendix A.
Approved For Release 2001/tf/Cf3!61X-RDP78-05601A000100250004-9
25X1A
25X1A
25X1C4e
25X1A
25X1A2g
25X1C4e
25X1A2g
Approved For Releue 2001/03/03 : CIA-RDP78-05604A000100250004-9
SM0RST
Capp drawings had been omitted frau the preliminary
drawings, he failed to imam& these drawings, or other
eneeted in the letter, in the final contract drawings released
to the ContretO2' on 22 OetOber 1966. MO stated that there was not
to make the requested Changes or include the missing
a result most Of the ()Pitted work and requested Changes
ed on a Change order and more expensive basis.
25X1A
des
and guard hauae. Although they agreed to provide these services, they
actually provided only drafting Services and the EnSiteers then
at the site had to do the complete de?ign including all details.
third instatce following Upper COM completion
visited the :site and
at on the lover e I change orders must be
be him for approval and that he it turn would immediately
the order to proceed On the Change Order to the Contractor.
flowerer although twenty-six Change 'orders were forwarded to the
in the period 14 October 1966 through 25 December 1966,
of 29 December had not received the first order to
on this Ohm& Order work. Letters and messages
inquiring about these change orders were never
the Contractor in practice began working on
Asubp basie of caebot copies of signed correspond-
the 111E1 Site &silo-leer to
a final example, repreeentatives of
etated on 11 December 1966 that a design for the Upper-Lower Camp
it OM week for change order
eatedly
answerB were
e Engineer requested
another instance,
a scope cr
was requested to
generator building
Line would be re
ions. Although
requested information on the
fortMoming. On 29 December 1 e
by mornge that change order negotiation on the Como Line be initiated
immediately. On 30 December an ameverwas received at the site stating
that the design would be ready ou 2 January 1967. On 15 January
Praimimary COIMM0 Line draVings were finally received at the site and
vire unsatiefactory. The drawinge were Standard details using
hardwire only available in the U.S. and using steel poles burled 6
feet in solid rock. On 18 January 1967 a meeting wee held with
repreientatives to discuss the design. At this meeting it was decided
that a eogpletely underground lime 'would be the most economical.
Melly, on the afternoon of 18 January 1967 the Contractor was
ippromehed officially concerning this work.
SXCR3 T
Approved For Release 2001/03/03 : CIA-RDP78-05601A000100250004-9
25X1A2g
25X1C4e
25X1C4e
25X1C4e
25X1C4e
25X1C4e
25X1A5a1
25X1A5a1
Approved For Releage 2001/03/03 : CIA-RDP78-05604A000100250004-9
4. -49,r aluation
4,1 Peri 1
The project
See
SECRET
and site invert ;Aga were perm
Other
on en,
employees with limited skill levels hired for the dura-
Although the COntractor was able to realize a finan-
through the use of largs nuMbers of indigenous eMployees,
of the work and adequacy of the supervision sufrered
WOrkmanship
Ths workmanship wea? cxce13.nt by local stntadz, but was
ObZY average by U.S. or European standards.
4.3 Financial Resources
The Contractor was cepa and willing to continue the job
.v* wtiexi PlYnents were Wit forthcoming. As a case and point, the
Contractor received the first artial payment for the t.er Cmmlo
oonstruction on 24 October at a time when construct on Wee over
98 permit coMPlete.
4.4 Organisation
The Contractor's headquarters organization is divided into
nein diviiions: (1) Tolustriel; (2) Highwaya and Roads; (3)
MudiahiP4 end (4) HeevY Construction. The head of the Buildings
Division is in charge of all overseas operations. Overseas operations
are in turn broken down geographically. Each overseas fice
apparently has a large measure of autonomy and only depends on the
headquarters element for financial and some logistical support. The
Site Superintendent on this job had rull authority to accept for the
company any Change orders. /he Project Manager had contracting
euthority in the neighborhood of one million dollars.
SECRET
Approved For Release 2001/03/03 : CIA-RDP78-05601A000100250004-9
Approved For Release 2001/03/03 : CIA-RDP78-05601A000100250004-9
R B T
Field itiiam of the PnetFactdon Proolect
ticisms of the conotruction project are iwen below.
plplatineplitaKplir trip, but are particularly impor-
represent a breakdown in communications which
influenced the COB's conduct towards those who represented
adquarters element.
5.1 Project Management
The COB was of the opinion that although he was responsible
for all field activities in his area' he was neither sufticientlY
sonsulted nor kept adequately advised of the plans, schedules, and
Beadquarters actions connected with the construction project.
5.2 Construction Commitments
The COB felt that varioua RECDpersomael had. made construe-
on commitments which they had tailed to halm. Ay wt17 of example: he
states that he was assured that the final plans would include a security
fence around the entire Lover Camp area ani a commnnicattons line from
the fter to the Lover Camp. These items were not included in the
final plans.
6. Recomoepdations
6.1 Technical
a. The use of local materials, and meth
should be stressed on all projects where cons
primary consideration.
of conatruction
tion time is the
b. When local materials ond methods of construction are
inadequate and time permits, prefab metal buildings should be
used in preference to palletizer type construction for all purposes
including housing.
c. Xf palletizer type construction is d.? it should be
restricted to the "basic" housing units only. The use of erected
units and units requiring flaehing or pluMbingwork should be
eliminated. The only exception to this would be the use of
palletizer construction whicE is campletel,y transported, erected,
and sold erected-at-site by the manufacturer.
d. No prefab units of any type should be purchased without,
as a minimum, an inspection as to the adequacy of the packing.
SECRET
Approved For Release 2001/03/03 : CIA-RDP78-05601A000100250004-9
25X1C
25X1A2g
25X1A2g
Approved For Releass.2001/03/03 : CIA-RDP78-056014000100250004-9
SECRET
On all jobs involving 4 great deal or 07M a Supply
be assigned to RECD to advise on lead times,
re, verify the adeemecy of all peekine, follow
nts and function as the final authority on
procurement matters.
forailliru prepared by
se eaticjagi be cet,e1y revi
eve
before they are released for construction. afr
,
6.2 Mansaertal CL jtu
a. Cue engine &Auldbe&Wald al 1**Igact eadinfter" CrQ-11)/
for eseh Job from its ,conseption to its ccupletion. %hie indivi- , 7
levject coordiaation.. Be should be assigned regardless of
dual should be responsible for all M externa
D l as well as internal yirk
enansering branch for hes, 461 "prOjeCt engineee, wOULd be serving
in a stanagerial rather than technical capacity. Be
ver, continue tO serve in las area of technical
VocialitY. Such a procedure would issure continuity, fix
responsibility, and improve project coordination.
b. When aey RECD representative has conversations with field
personnel which might be construed to *omit RECD to some course
of action, a Simoraztdxsu of Conversation should be written and sent
to the tieldZon coneurrenee. %his would prevent misunderstandings
concerning RECD construction commitments.
e. Prior to the= of am RECD engineer to the field, he
and his supervipor should prepare a guideline outlining hie field
4144i404 functions, and authorities. A copyjof this guideline
would then be forwarded to the area division and CDS. The prepare-
tion or this document would Insure that the ludividual and his
supervisor agree 46 to. the ;Individual's intended field activities.
Pb? the COSA this document would nerve am an introduction to the
individual and insure that there would eat be any mieunderstandimge
regarding the individuel'e future actions.
d. radependent relatbicsaihips should be astialished with
several vorId.wide contractors capable of performing "turn-key"
3ob? Such relationships, restricted to the highest members of
ths convany? would provide amens whereby jobs requirilu; mini-
NOM teentruction times could. be "controlled" directly blY RECD
iiiiiratherthanthroughathirdparty.Suchanarreenentwould
25X1C
Amtwed For Release 2001ema RCIA-RDP78-05601A000100250004-9
25X1C
25X1A2g
25X1C4e
25X1A2g
Approved For Re!ewe 2001/03/03 : CIA-RDP78-056Q4A000100250004-9
SECRET
11 Septnber 1966
De (Chief,
Attsabed are the comments by personnel here concerning
the Lower CamP preliminary drawings.
Two points are of particular concern to (COB). First) the
possible contamination of the spring from our case poolo (Comment a,
Sleet 114441-).c1), and seeond, the need for more room for expansion
hftris(partstudexitecainent g, Sheet 16-06-10-2C). (COB),
gad T will cheek into these two items and
forward our comments to you as soon as possible.
I hoe 0111111tElectrical Engineer) found time to review theae
drawings vbile in (Capital City). If not, he cen do so here.
einaer.41
SECRET
Approved For Release 2001/03/03 : CIA-RDP78-05601A000100250004-9
25X1A2g
25X1A9a
Approved For Relel,?e 2001/03/03 : CIA-RDP78-056Q4A000100250004-9
SECRET
Sheet
Comment
11 Septedber 1966
11+01-01
a.
Dip section should be indicated on plan view.
1C
b.
WIN in the Dip slab and temperature steel in the
Dip Dige Beam are required.
c.
Rip rap Should be used on both sides of the Dip
section.
d.
Steel dowels Should be used at the transverse
contraction joints to prevent differential
settlement when cracking occurs.
16-06-01
a.
Structural details of the culverts of and
1C
culvert headwalls should be provided.
b.
Rip rap should be provided at the downstream end
of all culverts to prevent undermining.
c.
An (Eastern) washcar shouldte provided in the
Industrial Area near the (Western) waahcar (GFE).
d.
An "A" frame for unloading cargos should be
provided Lear the warehouse. (Di trict Office)
has SketChes.
e.
There mmst be. facilities either inside or near
the Motor Pool for washing vehicles.
16-06-01
a.
The Como car must be moved to a location on a
2C
hill.slightlY to the south of the site. It will
be neeesSary to eonetruct several antenna founds,-
tics* and a Comm cable system between the Upper
and Lower Cps.
b. The Recreation Building should face the roadway.
e. Bldgs. 110 through 114 should exit on a walkway
running between these Bides. and Bldg. 115
through 118.
Approved For Release 2001/0%/83C:tWiRDP78-05601A000100250004-9
Approved For Release 2001/03/03 : CIA-RDP78-05604A000100250004-9
Meet
16-06-01
2C
SECRET
d. Bldg:R. 115 through 118 all face Bldg'. 110 through
U. Bence the walkway behind Bldga. 115 through
ila should be eliminated.
e. The drive between Bldg.. 118 and 119 is for
garbage pickup only.
The walkway between Bldgs. 122 and 123 should
extend 004 only to Bldgs. 120 and 121, but also
to the front of Bldg. 119, and thence down steps
to the roadway and parking area.
g.
It msy be necesiarY to increase the area between
Bldg*. (115 - 112) and Bldg. (109 - 114) to
provide for expansion of the student area.
16-06-01 a. Culvert encaaement should indicate reinforcement.
5C
b. CUIvert should have rip rap at downstream face
to prevent undercutting.
c. Nanholo base should indicate reinforcement.
11-04.01 The cesspools appear to be located near the
la source of the spring which will be used for water
supply. Contamination of the spri result.
Beecomendstions will be made to
11..04-01
a.
Bldis. should be grounded. 25X1C
1E3
26-03-02
a.
A buil line trench should be provided.
1S1
b.
Pad bolt spacing is incorrect. See OCE Dwg.
G. 346-91 3/17/66.
26-03-02
a.
Generator sizes indicated are incorrect. See OCE
Dwg. No. 346-9, 3/17/66. Apparently, the wrong
OCE powerhouse drawing was copied.
In addition to the above comment:, the following OCE dr a
have not been incorporated in the plan:
Naintenance Bldg. Layout
Warehouse Layout
OCT 346.12 4/8/66
OCE 346-13 4/8/66
SECRET
Approved For Release 2001/03/03 : CIA-RDP78-05601A000100250004-9
Approved For Release 2001/03/03 : CIA-RDP78-05684A000100250004-9
SECRET
Motor Poo3.. Electrical OCE 346-11A 10/66
Warehouse rlectrical OCE 346-13A 4/8/66
Maintenance Bldg. Electrical OCE 345-12A 4/8/66
Motor Pool Bldg. Layout OCE 346-11 4/5/66
Lover Coup Plumbing OCE 346-4B 6/5/66
SECRET
Approved For Release 2001/03/03 : CIA-RDP78-05601A000100250004-9
Approved For Releasa2001/03/03 : CIA-RDP78-05601A000100250004-9
25X1A2g
3"
SECANT
of Industrial Area Bldgs. and iome roads
liPProxinatekv 15.0m west, 5.0m south, 14 Oct 66.
2. Relocation of some Rousing Area pelletisers, 16 Nov 66. Complete
3. Addition or reinforcement to Roadway Dip Section and Cancelled
revision of generator pad anohor bolt*, 16 Nov 66.
Complete
4 Addition of tie-down hooks to center palletixer support Cnp1ete
an all palletisers, 17 Nov 66.
5. Installation Q: drop manholes at Manholes No. 5 and 6 Complete
Lower Camp Rousing Area, 17 Nov 66.
6 Construction of foundation for WM "A" frmse, 20 Nov 66. In Progreas
7. Construction of vehicle wash stand to be located mear 31 Progress
Industrial Area Motor POol, 20 Nov 66. (As amended)
8.
20 Nov 66.
Elimination or one the Industrial Area Leaching Cesspools, Complete
Realinement ot the site access road so ea to terminate Complete
at the (Main) Road, 27 Nov 66,
10. Construction or two additional single culverts on the Complete
site access road, 27 Nov 66.
U. Constrution of four CM antenna foundatioos, 27 Nov 66. Complete
12. Oorrection of ratter fabrication error 1'oill11111111 Complete
Maintenance 314., 28 Nov 66.
13. Dilation of water connection to Bldg. No. 116, Lab, Cancelled
5 Deo 66.
14. Addition of Manholes NO. 7, 8, and 9 to Rousing Area Complete
sow llme, 5 Dec 66.
ONCRNT
Approved For Release 2001/03/03 : CIA-RDP78-05601A000100250004-9
25X1A
Approved For Relwe 2001/03/03 : CIA-RDP78-056WA000100250004-9
SECRET
441.1
Status
15. Deletion of two Street ",&" culverts and one Acceas Complete
Road culvert, 5 Dec 66.
16 installation of two drop manholes in Industrial Area Complete
sewer lima, 8 Dec 66.
17. Installation of Grease Trap for both Mess Bldgs., Complete
10 Dec 66.
18. Removal of four, 4-71 Genarator Sets from Upper Camp Complete
Powerhouse and installetipn of said generators in Lower
Comp Pewerhouse, 10 Dec 66.
19. installation of GPM 10,000 liter fuel tank at Lower CalMD /n Progress
Powerhouae, 15 Dec 66.
20. Installation of GPM 4,000. liter fuel tank and 50m Of In Progress
COntreet fUrmithed distribution liue in Housing Area,
15 Dec (As amended)
21. Construction of 1353m of 7-strand barbed wire fence with It Progress
drop-bar gate, 20 Dec 66.
22. Erection of am Chain link fence around Commo Palletizer In Progress
N. 1231 21 Dec 66.
23. increase in length of GPM chain link fence around Mater Cancelled
Supply Area, 21 Dec 66.
24. Construction of 200m of protective rip-zap drainage in Progress
ditches around the Industrial Area, 25 Dec 66. (As
amended)
25. Construction of Motor P001 ?mace Pit wall voids for Complete
future light and receptatile installation, 25 Dec 66.
26. imetellotion of A/C water lines up to bine Housing Complete
Area Buildings, 25 Dec 66.
SECRET
Approved For Release 2001/03/03 : CIA-RDP78-05601A000100250004-9