PROPOSED PROJECT: DETERMINATION OF LABOR INPUT REQUIREMENTS FOR (1) INDUSTRIES COMPRISING THE 80-ORDER CLASSIFICATION END (2) SPECIFIC PRODUCTS INCLUDED IN THESE INDUSTRIES, BY BOTH PHYSICAL AND VALUE UNITS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP78-04718A002600390047-2
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
10
Document Creation Date: 
December 23, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 12, 2014
Sequence Number: 
47
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 1, 1947
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP78-04718A002600390047-2.pdf894.4 KB
Body: 
Declassified and Approved For Release 2014/03/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A002600390047-2 Tab A S-E-C-R-E-T S.* ISL., ???? *an. Proposed Projects Determination of Labor Input requirements for (1) industries comprising the 80.order classification and (2) specific products included in these industries s by both Ifteical and value units Introduction After exploratory investigation and discussions with technicians in the manpower fields It has been ascertained that the basic data required to conduct a project of thio nature are available from the 1947 Census of Manufactures and individual studiee conducted in the Bureau of Labor Statistics, particularly the Divisions of Interindustry Economicss Pro- ductivity and Technological Developmentss and Manpower and Employment Statistics, It has been suggested that a thorough review of the indivi. dual BLS studies in the productivity and emplortant field be made to es- tablish to what degree of detail it is possible to extend unit man-hour requirernents on a product detail basis which would be consistent with the overell primary product industry approach. For labor input requirements based on the 80-order classifications procedures can be developed. from 1c47 Census data which will yield consistent results, As outlined belows the asic problems apart from the choice of proper standards of measure. ment relates to the transformation of Census data on employment and out- put Aeom the establisheent basis to the primary product wherever produced one. The recently established output control totals for the IO (O sector) industries defined on a primary product wherever produced basiss will enable properly weighted labor inputs to be obtained. Before pro. ceeding to a discussion of the procedures proposed to obtain measures of laboe input requirements on an 80-order industry primary product basis, it ie worthwhile to discuss the three possible measures which can be em. ployed to describe labor input requirements and the advantages and diee advantages of each, I, General Discussion of Labor Input Coefficients Labor input eeacuremente relate to tll.. eeount of labor vequirede Le dollar or plefeicel tarnes to produee A unit of output; they likewiss :ay be expressed In dealer or physical torte. The labor compament included in the labor input per mit of output may refrr to "production and related yorkorei or to "all employeeW which inaludta production and related vsorkore" and "all ono? eeployeeo," 1/ :it invo exception of the unit 17797477?ensua? of Naeaveturess Vol. lin pp. 12elhe e 4 e S.E.CReEer sa. '1.? q1,2 34,40 npriacsified and Aooroved For Release 2014/03/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A002600390047-2 Declassified and Approved For Release 2014/03/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A002600390047-2 S-E-C-R-E-T man-hour requirement approach, labor input per unit of output can be readily expressed in terms of "all employees" or "production and re. lated workers." A. Labor C22fastentil Based on ilmo3j,_..a The labor input coefficient which most closely approximates the usual interindustry flow coefficient relates to the ratio of tctal annual wages and salaries of an industry-i.e., payrolls or money cost of labor-to the annual monetary output value of the industry. The resultant relationship is described as the labor input in monetary terms per designated monetary unit of output. This measure is inapplicable when the objective is to compare relative labor input requirements for the same industries over time or for different industries or economics. Payroll data used in this particular index reflect not only the industrial techniqees, economic activity levels, and labor force compositione.i.e.? full time, part time employeeseebut also the accompanying institutional factors associated with the indalstry. Thus payroll data include payments for such items as vaca- tion,, sick and dismissal pay, and nonproduction bonuses. B. Labor Coefficients Based on Numb.se_gzem! A second index which can be employed is the ratio of either the average yearly number of "all employees" or "production and related workers in an industry" to the total yearly monetary output of the industry; this maybe described as the labor input in physical terms per designated monetary unit of output. This particular labor input is beset with definite limitations which can give rise to serious instability in the coefficients. Although the total number of workers in an industry may not change significantly, yearly hours worked per worker may register wide variations from year to year in an industry due to changing economic conditiona. Thus, if the total number of workers in an industry remains constant for two periods of time and productivity does not change for the two time periods, labor in- put coefficients for the industry may register a decline for the latter period because of increased output over the base year due to an increase in yearly hours worked per worker. Itt Notwithstanding these aforementioned limitations, this particular index of labor input requirements per unit of output mays as indicated below, serve a useful analytic purpose and should not be summarily discarded, r."?,tation may result from changing proportions Lutween full and part time employees and by *standing the work week at cull and part time *splay-acts. t SeEeC.R.E.T Declassified and Approved For Release 2014/03/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A002600390047-2 Declassified and Approved For Release 2014/03/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A002600390047-2 SE-C-R-E-T C. Labor Coefficients Based on Maxi-hours The unit manehours criterion used to measure labor inputs is defined as the ratio of the total number of man-hours worked per year by "produce tion and related workers" in an industry to the total yearly output of the industry in value terms. Mille the physical labor input coefficient per designated unit of monetary output is seriously hampered by changing cone ditione? other than technological, over time, the unit manehours require. ment index appears to imply straight-line proportionality in relation to the scale of production and thus maybe inadequate, in itself, to indicate the degree of increased output per worker per year, or conversely, the physical labor input requirements per year associated with a stipulated increase in output. The industry unit man-hour requirements which can be computed from Census data represent an average for the whole year. Howe ever, if unit nmnehour requirements are not constant over the entire range of the working year, the ratios obtained may have built-in biases which limit the validity of the proportionality assumption. 2/ D. Observations For individual industries or for the more basic operating units, the problem of unit man-hour requirements may be a more important considerae tion than the physical labor input employed in producing the annual out- put. The former has impact upon the financial status of the operating units, while the latter, being conditioned by increased average hours worked yearly by full or part time employees, may continue to fall and re- sult in rising unit man-hour requirements and, consequently* higher cost per unit of output, assuming wage rates to be constant. However, when mandatory increases in output, irrespective of labor cost, are part of a national program, physical labor input coefficients may SWUM considerable importance* the underlying assumption being that the labor supply is more inelastic over a period of time for all industries as a whole (i.e., the nationel economy) than for specific industries. On an overall national scale, increasing man-hour requirements may serve as indicators and regu- lators of the limiting conditions imposed in the reduction of the labor input coefficients for a given labor force, Thus national considerations might Cemand that certain production be carried to the point where mar- ginal unit man-hoer requirements approach infinity, and, therefore, physical labor input coefficients become irreducible* 7-111S'Oruairiy man-hour statistics reported in the Census of Manufactures and the Annual Surveys of tenufacturos refer only to production and related works and do not include the category of "all other ebc4yees." For cer- tain industries this understateeent of men-hours for "all employees" ele?Y be considerable* '.3 - 11?11. Oar ???? 0110 MVO Declassified and Approved For Release 2014/03/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A002600390047-2 . Declassified and Approved For Release 2014/03/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A002600390047-2 S -R-E7T E. General Conclusions Clearly, both unit man.hour requirements and physical labor input coeffie.ents ("production and related writers") per unit of output are desirable indices to have available for analytic purposes where labor requirements are an essential part of an overall national economic study. In utilizing unit man.hour requirements for inter-year compari- sons in order to project manpower requirements, changes in average hours worked or stipulated per year may be worthy of separate examination inde- pendent of the study of change in unit man-hour requirements resulting from the application of advances in teohnology. Productivity studies which are not based on the division of total man-hours by annual output but on individual performance studies may prove useful in discerning pro- ductivity changes which do not contain the elements of a yearly average. In respect to yearly hours worked per worker, if significant increases are postulated, it may be appropriate to examine the implications in terms of changing unit man-hour requirements and physical labor input require. manta. An estimate of the hours worked per year per worker in an industry can be obtained by dividing the total number of man-hours worked in the industry by the total number of workers employed in the industry. Esti- mates a? average hours worked per year are in themselves rather crude tools welen used to appraise the possibilities and extent of expanding out. put by utilizing the labor force more intensively. Further useful infor- mation would include composition of labor force (i.e., full or part time employees, sex, age) to determine relevant factors tending to restrict expansion of average hours worked per year (i.e., family responsibilities, physical limitations, etc.). Always lurking in the background in this type of analysis is the assumption of sufficient plant capacity and the maintenance of the necessary synchronized flow of materials. Thus, de- pending upon an analysis of these various factors which affect labor re- quirereets, different assumptions may be made as to limitations imposed on marginal unit man-hour requirenents and physical labor input coef- ficiente. Summarizing, it would appear that estimates for both unit man-hour requirements and physical labor input coefficients per designated monetary unit or output should be attempted. I have not as yet had the opportunity to conduct a careful analysis of labor input reqeirements for specific products, in physical and value units, included in the 80 order industries and therefore have refrained from =king any substantive coulents on this subject. I-expect to prepare a nowt owthis tentative phase of the pro- ject at 4 later date. As a final note to the general discussion, it shou2d be .1Anderscored ? that an interindustry and inter.osecnomy inferences to be drawn from allY set of labor input coefficients computed according to tLe indices outlined - 4 e Sae.C.R.E.T Declassified and Approved For Release 2014/03/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A002600390047-2 Declassified and Approved For Release 2014/03/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A002600390047-2 above merit the closest examination to ascertain their validity or, at least, their appropriateness. Labor input coefficients should not be used for value judgments among industry groups within an econogy; for example, one should not infer comparative efficiency or inefficiency as to the use of labor among industries. Labor and plant and equipment may all be equal, but a variance in labor input coefficients may occur among industries simply because of differences in cost of materials in rela- tion to output resulting from the particular stages of production with shich particular industries are concerned. Even if labor and plant and equipment are not the same, variance in labor input coefficients among industries might occur because of differing degrees of industrial inte- gration among industries. It is conceivable that labor inputs, when comm pared to value added for the industries in westion? might yield similar ratios but would show extreme variations when compared to their respective outputs, More appropriate inferences, and perhaps significant as indica- tive of policy decisions, might be drawn from the relative dispersion of labor input coefficients among industries and grouped by annual time periods. This could be shown in graphical form by plotting labor input coefficients along the ordinate and industries (i.e., from 1 to 80) along the abscissa. If any attempt were made to estimate laboi input coefficients for similar industries located in different economies from information ob- tained for industries in the United States economy, it would be necessary to proceed with extreme caution and buttress the estimates with additional information, particularly as to the relative industry capital structures in both economies. y What would appear to be required is information cone corning the scope of the manufacturing processes (degree of integration) encompassed for comparable industries located in the domestic and foreign economies and the capital associated with each manufacturing Step in the integrated industries. Comparable capital structure bases could be ob. tamed ty subtracting from the relevant industries the capital associated with the integrated process tending to create the incorparability. In additior to examining the degree of integration for similar industries located in two different economies in order to neutralize these differences, the amornt of capital plant and equipment per worker would undoubtedly be an in: of the utmost significance for attempts at estimating labor input coefficients for other economies based on estimates derived from the United States ecenomr. If extremely questionable estimates are to be avoided, it would speer that efforts should be directed to ascertaining, at a minimum, the verying effects on the relevantlbor input doeffietients of differing capital structures for comparable industries located in different economies. y7-ps,as a general summary expression, it may be stated that Lebec neat Coefficients for similar industries located in different economise 'my 'vary due to differences in capital structure, &wet., a integration, ocepositton of labor force, hours worked, institutional factors, etc. - 5 - SeEe0eReEeT Declassified and Approved For Release 2014/03/12: CIA-RDP78-04718A002600390047-2 *oeclasS-ifiedandApprovedForRelease2014/03/12:CIA-RDP78-04718A002600390047-2 S-E-C-R-E-T ???? SO. OM. 4?44 II. Operational Procedure to Derive Labor Input Coefficients for Primary Product Industries In order to derive "production and related workers" require- ments for primary product industries based on physical labor input co- efficients and unit man-hours per monetary unit of output, it is necese sery to have yearly primary product industry data relating to the number of "production and related workers," total man-hours worked by "production and related workers," and value of output. These data are either already available, as in the case of primary product industry output control totals, or can be derived from the statistical compilations included in the 109147 Census or Annual Surveys of Manufactures (190, 1950, 1.951, l952)0 Census industry data for "production and related workers," arebased On the establishment concept and hence require adjustment to accord with the concept of primary product wherever produced before they can be employed in the ?resent project. Below is an adjustment procedure intended to transform the relevant Census data to the proper base and thus enable the' computation of the desired labor input requirements for primary product industries. A- teroffeniety In the Census of Manufactures industry statistics, the data caviled refer to both primary and secondary products produced in an industry. Consequently, the relationships between the labor employed in an industry and the output of that industry which can be derived from Census data are -inapplicable for this project, Schematically, the labor input coefficients (and ure.t man-hours) which can be derived from Census data may be presented ae folleeet 1. Labor input coefficient for Census industry i 5/ ? a0 labor input coefficient for primary products of Census industry i (output of primary product of Census industry 1) t b, labor input coefficient for secondary products of Census industry i (output of secondary product of Census industry ?I). c. Beth (a) and (b) are divided by total output of Ceeeus industry i. 20 A allilar presentation may be eada for unit man-heu(te Er7LT-Titfars P 111011.Akbee ) ?(i) io(i)0 tAD i PP 0 ilsp -1 or alternativay ) LIC(Opp LIC(i)sp = 6 Declassified and Approved For Release 2014/03/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A002600390047-2 . Declassified and Approved For Release 2014/03/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A002600390047-2 =MP 11.1. IMO Ono ????? ;ontirrued tilerefore 20.) LIC(1) ?= LIC.1(i)pp a 0(i)pp 4.. LIC(i)sp /0( 1), N.rheret LIC(i) = 3.abor input coefficient for Census industry P = "production and related writers" for :;ensus industry o( i) = output. of Census industry 1.; and subscripts pp and sp refer to piary products and secondary products, respectively? ,Obje.ctives of the lid ustment Procodure Given primary product industryoutput control totals, which wore derived in order to comp..te primary product irxut coefficients, the prob- lem in this project is xeducod to detemininn for each Census industry the distribution or the amber of f,production and related writers" and their total man-hours between primary and secondary production and -then transferrinc the estimates relatinc to secondary production to the proper primary ;,..,1roducine industries? The rationale for this transfer procedure is outlined belotn. Total ic of "production and related workers" in Census inalstry less: number of "production and related workere attributable to secondary production of Census industry plus: nonbor of "production and related uorhors" of other Census in?iustIles attributable to t o production outside of 1Lr,...E3 industry A of its r: product, ?goals: I Its? :Lc f.er ot Census ". a.loi related uorkers'. atirltutunle to the pxduction ol! products classified as pr ry Census industry in 2'i 4, similar prowl-lath= is required for 7mn.heurso y q--T-613s. -ffaav? Rafor Census industries were combined to ront T.0 indue- .ries and thas the .3perstion described in Ott tine* can be palmed c* mere .aggregativebie tilan indicated, if he purpose of this project, estivate" have to be Dade of the umber ot. proirlootima end ..clated worlmrs _ -1.-.;:i-ars) that wou.l. to- r e.quircit prviucti ettepetitive inports anti inventory depletione for letteyiejr,. 8' -4.4- a Declassified and Approved For Release 2014/03/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A002600390047-2 Declassified and Approved For Release 2014/03/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A002600390047-2 S-E-C-R-E-T C. The Proposed Adustment Procedure A preliminary operation in the adjustment procedure is the aggrega- tion, where necessary, of Census industry data for production ane related workers and their total manehours to the 1-0 industry definition. For ease of operation, the next step is to determine the taunter of production workers and their total manehours attributable to primary products of Census industries produced in Census industries other than the producing one (the soecalled "transfers-in"). 2/ If the assumption is mace that the manehours required to produce a designated unit value of primary pro- duct in industries other than the primary producing one are the an as the manehours required to produce a designated unit of output in the primary producing industry, total manehour estimates attributable to "transfers-in" can be derived. The total value of "transfers-inv meItie plied by unit man-hour requirements of the industry receiving the "trans- fersein" can be utilized as an estimate of the total number of Ion-hours attributable to the production of primary products outside of the primary producing indmTMry. The concomitant estimate for the nueber of "produce tion and related workers" attributable to "transfers-in" cant secured as follows For each industry transferring out secondary products, it is possible to estimate the hours worked per year per worker by dividing the total man-hours worked by "production and related workers et by the total number of production workers. Assuming that for the traneferring-out industry the hours worked per year per worker is the name for both primary and secondary production, an estimate of the number of workers attributable to each "transfer-in" can be obtained by Cividing the man-hour require- ments for each "transfer-in" by the hours worked per yearper worler in the transferring-out industry. .The increments for the "number of pro- duction and related workers" and their total manehoure resulting from industries receiving "transfers-in" need t? be offset, of course, by appropriate decrements to the transferring-out industries. Since Census industries usually ireaude secondary products in their outputs, unit manehour requirements for industries which are computed from Census data, in order to estimate total man-hours for "trensfers- contain a bias. It is believed that where secondary products (trans- fers-oul are not sieniricant, the resultant bias in the labor input measurements will not be significant0 however, for industries in which the production of oecondary products is important (e.g., more than lOper- cent of direct .inauto)? the bias maybe sektantial. It is preponed, .4.7.7".-reTe.aMtl information for egreonder, products is availible from the ;ark done for t'e turrent priecry product industry project. SeE-Genene? ????? 41. Declassified and Approved For Release 2014/03/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A002600390047-2 Declassified and Approved For Release 2014/03/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A002600390047-2 S-E-C-R-E-T therefore, that the ?transfer-in" adjustments be performed first for industries where the impact of secondary products is not considered to be significant. Then intermediate estimates can be made to include all relevant revisions resulting from recording "transfers-in" for the rela- tively homogeneous industries and from partial revisions on the "trans. fers-out" aide for both the relatively homogeneous and heterogeneous industries. The objective of this intermediate computational stage is to reduce as much as possible for heterogeneous industries the number of "production and related workers," their total man-hours, and the industry output attributable to eecondary products. After completion of this stage, "transfer-in" revisions for the heterogeneous industries are to be undertaken following the procedure outlined above. After all relevant data are available in terms of primary product in- dustries (i.e., number of "production and related workers," their total man-hours, and monetary output), the data must be aggregated to the 80. order industry classification before the desired physical labor input coefficients and unit man.hour requirements are computed. Do Coefficienta for is .proposed that the data in the 1947 Census of Manufactures be employed to obtain the basic estimates. If desirable, labor input re. quirementsestimates for the years 1949, 1950, 1951 and 1952 can now be constructed. A series such as indicated would require several adjust- ments to the data in order to achieve comparability with the bane year, 1947. The "nueher of production and related workers," their total man.,, hours, and Census industry output appearing in the Annual Census Survey of Manufaetures would have to be adjusted for industry definition (i.e., from Census industry to I-0 industry and front the I-0 industry establish- ment basis to a primary product one) and for changes in price level of output in relation, to the base year. The Bureau of Labor Statistics has developed interindustry wholesale price indices (1947 8 100) for I-0 industries for each subsequent year throsgh the first half of 1953. These price indices can be applied to appropriately aggregated annual Census output data to achieve compara- bility with the lease year. Scalar factors (coefficients) employed in the primary product industry project tc achieve a transedrmation of out- put control totals tram an establishment to a primary product industry basis can be emeleeied to adjust the annual price corrected industry out- put estimates derived 'rot Census data0 In order to *Move labor input relationships Which are consistent with the prieere- !Product industry definitien, the following adjustment should be *Wit . 0 . S.E.C.R.E1 Declassified and Approved For Release 2014/03/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A002600390047-2 Declassified and Approved For Release 2014/03/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A002600390047-2 CONFIDENTIAL 1* The statistics total industry man-hours for "production and related workers" (on an I-0 industry basis), can be adjusted by applying a coefficient which will transform man-hours from an establishment to a primary product industry base* This coefficient maybe defined as the ratio of the 1947 primary product total manehours estimate for "production and related workers" to the 1947 total man-hours for "production and re- lated workers" on an establishment basis. 2. Total nuMber of Census "production and related workers" (adjusted to an I-0 industry basis) can be transformed to the primary product industry concept by applying a factor representing the ratio of the 1947 primary product industry number of "production and related workers" to the 1.947 number of I-0 industry production and related workers on an establishment basis* It it were desired to adjust the physical labor input coefficients to the 1947 bases an average hours worked per year per worker series (properly weighted with 19)47 e 100) would be recleirede Unddjusted estimates of physical_ labor input coefficients for years other than 1947 may prove useful, along with information available at the same time concerning the relative change of average hours worked per year per workers in analyzing the potential maximum utilization of a given labor force* The difference between a stipulated potential maximum utilization of labor and the utilization of the labor force for any given period may indicate the possibilities of intensifying labor force utilizations assuming the availability of necessary plant capacity and materiels* Declassified and Approved For Release 2014/03/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A002600390047-2