RATING OFFICIAL'S GUIDE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP78-04718A000500160005-6
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
14
Document Creation Date: 
November 17, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 11, 1999
Sequence Number: 
5
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 1, 1944
Content Type: 
REQ
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP78-04718A000500160005-6.pdf770.11 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 20'00/06/13.: CiA-RDP 047 1 5005001600 f, Rating Official's GUIDE Do you use the uniform To All Super= visors efficiency rating system approved by the U. S. Civil Service Commission? If so. . READ THIS CAREFULLY It affects you and your employees. EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1944 FILE FOR FUTURE REFERENCE Approved For Release 2000/06/13 : CIA-RDP78-04718A000500160005-6 Approved For Release 2000/06/13 : CIA-RDP78-04718A000500160005-6 "If we except the light and the air of heaven, no good thing has been or can be en- joyed by us without having first cost labor. And inasmuch as most good things are pro- duced by labor, it follows that all such things of right belong to those whose labor has pro- duced them. But it has so happened, in all the ages of the world, that some have labored, and others have without labor enjoyed a large proportion of the fruits. This is wrong, and should not continue. To secure to each laborer the whole product of his labor, or as nearly as possible, is a worthy object of any good government." A. LINCOLN. NOTE: The "whole product of labor" must be known before a proper award can be made. dy AJ your ou dO Sep t?Yourgop [ ~/ ? do 1ll ingbOrdinat erno nt I1 vLs0 Y_.1 es Job You have well Y tO o k-1204, 4041? Y Jobs/ O logfea1, ? ? Your ur Orga ?u mu O ire result W ? 1001, subord ~lyatio stl It mean ,$ so ti, y that Your its You f lteq 11 ? is Your treat egt R'i11jy may "18 Will b"/le ShOUlcl on'gibilit this in to k, OT " the?'bat is to *U Whey u~ given 0Pnsigte w4y? per ?aeh ?f Y to tell ilrrtlati ~'he d bee Work 411Y ins Od, will the S pt I'll ? au th GaAs so you d0 ththern/ o". It i~ to 1jAr?pa ~rf?NatruQtloll iv? e p,11Ibej1c411tb? rest~4t there 4 your $~d rod the i s ~h$t1 Of ottl hots; to 'must b ntfrel Even cOC7l roso ?R'4 rate 0 u$e the tred, 1$te ~19 1s why to vol u aro OYeos haT be fol ysatisf though d lot b ~auY ?rkPer 111 T , e 4ete Eb IsR'ed by a11~Yto 1.00 e 1 one ~v8e Gov edeoutrat Og an et unroll ouo~ th 0 $ l1~~ OPP o ~t o thest$ g de ay that ti~ e u {l , vpOrf atO?d?nt ? a 41 ~OetJ e8t U ser~'ice. t0 be s", I re vu 't all $ Of s $~ ep~cte?rAiu?a ?ugbuterricOgc eyes t prrnttn~ 0~?8 the Fed ~htbet?n Zs D, 0 Approved For Release 2000/06/13 : CIA-RDP78-04718A000500160005-6 Approved F6r Release 2000/06/13 : RDP78-0 18A0005 Q160005-6 this: Tell your employee- how ey are oing. . low How you go about it S When you do it % Why you do U l Don't argue; don't dominate; just tell frankly and honestly what is required of the employee in his job and how he is meeting the require- ments. Tell him what he ought to know, not what he would like to hear, and make suggestions for improvement. Also, listen to him, he may have some suggestions or facts that will interest you. Discuss his work performance, also his efficiency rating. Prepare for the interview.-Jot down the points that make you feel the way you do about the employee. Relate them' to the efficiency rating. Have illustrations or factual data ready. Try to arrange for privacy during the interview. Don't set a time limit of less than 15 minutes-the interview should not be under pressure. The interview.-Put the employee at ease. Discuss the values of such an interview to you and to him. Discuss his job, his work per- formance and his efficiency rating. Give praise where deserved and criticize straightforwardly and constructively. Let the employee know where he stands. Above, all, do not force the employee to agree with your evaluations of his work performance. Explain things be- cause most grievances or appeals are due to a lack of understanding rather than a disagreement as to facts. Be honest, frank, judicial. Face the facts but show a sincere interest in the employee's problems. Let the employee speak freely, ask questions, and make suggestions. Do not argue with him, but answer his questions, help him analyze his problems, suggest several possible solutions, and offer to help in carrying them out. Conclude the interview.-Tell the employee to think about what he has been told and to cpme back if he wants to discuss certain things further, that you are ready to help him. As often as possible. Find time for it. If you haven't done it during the rating period, by all means do it. before he receives a cold, formal, unexplained notice of his efficiency rating. Every employee, yourself included, should know at all times where he stands, how he is doing. Such knowledge encourages greater effort and efficiency. Employee interviews, if done properly, lubricate the machinery and make the organization run smoother because they reduce friction and irritation. They also create confidence that your attitudes and judgments are unbiased and fair. 92182?--46 `4 Approved For Release 2000/06/13 : CIA-RDP78-04718A000500160005-6 Approve- d For Release 2000/06/13 : CIA-RDP7718A000500160005-6 Ito this! How you go about it! When you do it! Why you do it! Fill in or, verify entries in heading of rating form. Name-Check with a list of employees, if necessary. Indicate by check mark in the blanks on the top of the form whether the rating is regular, probational, or special. Ratings made under administrative instructions for other purposes should be checked "Administrative-Unofficial." A regular rating is made as of March 31. It is an official rating made for all who are not serving a probational period and who have worked in the agency at least 90 days in the grade of the position held on that date or, when such coverage is not practical or feasible, it may be made if the employee has worked at least 90 days under the rating official. A probational rating is made 60 days prior to the end of the pro- bational period. It is an official rating. No "Regular" (March 31) rating is made during the probational period of an employee. A special rating is made when there is no appropriate cu:rent official rating and one is needed for salary advancement or reduction in force. A special rating is official for all purposes even though it is for less than 90 days. Classification symbols and title of position.-Enter official desig- nations. Check with available official records, if necessary. Period from ------ to ------ -Refer to employee's personnel records. Regular rating.-Frorn April 1 to March 31 or as much of this period as employee was on active duty (at least 90 days) under the conditions stated above. Probational rating.-Prom the beginning of probational service in the agency in the grade of the position held on the date the rating is due to its due date, provided it covers at least 90 days. Special rating.-Indicate the period that the employee served in the agency (1) from the date of the last official rating on record, or (2) from the date the employee entered in the grade, whichever is later, to the date the special rating is made. Organization in which position is located.-This is a matter of general knowledge. If in doubt, check with organization charts or with head of unit. Do it before you start to rate-as soon as you get the efficiency rating forms. It should be completed before the end of the period covered by the :rating. To identify employee. To indicate kind of rating. To identify employee's position. To indicate the period of service to be considered in rating work performance. To indicate the place of the position in the organization structure. 4 Approved For Release 2000/06/13 : CIA-RDP78-04718A000500160005.6 Approved For Release 2000/06/13 I-RDP 8-04718A0Q0 0 160005-6 this t Select or verify the efficiency rating elements per- tinent to the position. How you go about it s When you do it s Why you do it s Think of the different positions or arrange rating forms according to classification grade and class; for example: Stenographers CAF-2 separate from Clerks CAF-2. Think of the employee's position. Refresh your memory of the position's intended scope, duties, and responsibilities by reading again the official job description and by referring to assignments. Determine whether the position is or is not administrative, super- visory, or planning. Decisions are indicated by placing a check mark in one of the two boxes at the upper right-hand side of the rating form. The elements in italics are to be used for rating administrative, supervisory, and planning functions in the position. The elements not in italics are to be used for rating other functions whether in administrative, supervisory, or planning positions or in other types of positions. Become familiar with the various elements on the rating form. You will find on the last few pages of this. material some informa- tion that will assist you in doing this. REMEMBER THE ELE- MENTS HAVE MEANING ONLY IN REFERENCE TO A PARTICULAR POSITION. Select the elements, and only those elements, that are pertinent to the position. The elements used should be the same for like positions. In some cases, the efficiency rating committee will. have suggested the elements. If you have any disagreements with the suggested selections, check with the committee. If you are working on the forms and you feel that additional elements are pertinent, encircle the element number in red ink, or if any suggested element is not pertinent, cross out its number in red ink. Changes should be made uniformly for like positions. These changes should be cleared, if possible, with the committee. The committee will see them anyway when it reviews your ratings for approval. The best time to do this is in time for the employee to know, close to the beginning of the rating period, which elements are going to be considered in rating his work performance during the coming period. If it hasn't been done at the beginning of the rating period, it should receive attention as soon as the rating, forms are received. If it has been done at the beginning of the rating period, make sure the employee's position hasn't been changed before you use the elements for rating at the end of the period. The efficiency rating is not an evaluation of the employee but of his work performance. The work performance is measured by the yardstick of reasonable job requirements., Job requirements must be related to activities found in the position. In other words, a char- woman should not be rated on her effectiveness in meeting and dealing with others because, regardless of how effective or ineffective she might be in this respect, this activity is not found in that position. Approved For Release 2000/06/13 : CIA-RDP78-04718A000500160005-6 Approved For Release 2000/06/13 : CIA-RDP78-04718A000500160005-6 Do this S now you go ,about it S When you do it ! Why you do It l jr Determine the adjective efficiency rating. The evaluations with respect to each of the elements used are consolidated into an adjective efficiency rating by following the "standard" found on the rating form. It is to be noted that the markings on the underlined (especially important) elements are given more consideration than the others used. The standards for the adjective ratings of "Good" and "Fair" call for the use of judgment in determining whether weaknesses represented by minus marks on underlined and non-underlined elements are overcompensated by outstanding performance repre- sented by plus marks on underlined and non-underlined elements. Your judgment should, not be based on the theory that one plus mark balances a minus mark. Rather, you must consider the kind and level of position and determine the relative importance of. the items marked plus and: minus. If you have for consideration any ratings made by another supervisor covering performance in a position of the same grade, do not mechanically or mathematically consolidate, average or combine them with. your rating-consider them in the process of making your rating. The standard will give proper results in the great majority of cases. Where its use does not give a proper adjective rating, devi- ations from the standard are permissible but have to be explained on the back of the rating form. Deviations may be permissible when the employee's performance is so outstanding in certain especially important respects that it completely overshadows the inadequacies. They are also permissible when the employee's performance is so defective in certain respects that it nullifies his performance in all other respects. Write in the adjective efficiency rating in the blank space provided for the Rating Official. As soon as you are satisfied that the element evaluations are correct, that is, they properly reflect the work performance as meas- ured by the reasonable requirements of performance in that kind and level of position. The adjective efficiency rating completes the picture of the em. ployee's work performance. Its determination takes into account the inadequacies of the efficiency rating system which reduces to a method what is by its nature a judgment process. The adjective efficiency rating is used in such formal actions as salary advancement, reduction in force, salary reduction, . aqd dismissal for inefficiency. Approved For Release 2000/06/13 : CIA-RDP78-04718A000500160005-6 Approved ror Release 2000/06/13 : Q A-RDP78-04718A000500160005-6 ." this g i Check your work. How you go about it 2 When you do it l Why you do It l Assemble the rating forms and arrange them according to classi- fication grade and class; for example: Stenographers CAF-2 separate from Clerks CAF-2. Review all the ratings, comparing the rating of each employee, one with the other, within each class and grade (for instance, all Clerks CAF-2) for the purpose of making sure that: 1 You have maintained the same reasonable requirements of work performance; 2 You have not been influenced by such personal considerations as personal loyalty, sympathy, friendship, or prejudice; 3 You have not allowed your rating to be influenced by instances of success or failure in the elements of the job that are not typical of.the employee's general performance; 4 You have used correct judgments in your rating regardless of whether others might say that you have rated liberally or conservatively; 5 You have not considered length of service in your ratings; 6 You have not been influenced by the employee's previous regular rating; 7 The rating form is complete in all respects. Immediately after you have rated the work performance of all employees under your supervision. The rating of work performance is not a responsibility that can be taken lightly. Too much depends upon it. If the ratings are not fair to all employees or to the agency in which they work, the actions based on the ratings will not be fair to all employees or to the Govern- ment agency. Approved For Release 2000/06/13 : CIA-RDP78-04718A000500160005-6 Approved For Release 2000/06/13 : CIA-RDP78-04718A000500160005-6 Do this s Sign and date the report and give it to the reviewing officiall.. How you go about it l When you do It ! Why you do it S On the blank spaces at the bottom of the rating form after the words "Rated by," write legibly in ink your name, your titlo, and the date of your signature. Then give the ratings to your immediate, supervisor who will either be the Reviewing Official or will transmit them to hire. If there is no one who fits the description "the supervisor highest in line of authority above the rating -official who has personal know- ledge of the general performance of the employee to be rated and of the standards of performance of the unit in which the employee is assigned as compared with standards in other units," submit your ratings directly to the efficiency rating committee or the person who gave you the rating forms. After you are satisfied that you have rated work performance properly and are willing to stand behind your judgment. The whole job of efficiency rating for all your subordinates should be completed within 10 days or 2 weeks after you have received the rating forms. A supervisor is required not only to make judgments but also to stand behind them. The responsibility for the part he plays in the whole process must be definite and a part of the record. Approved For Release 2000/06/13 : CIA-RDP78-04718A000500160005-6 Approved F6r Release 2000/06/13 :`ACA-RDP78-04718A000500160005-6 H m ) q.q bA ~G bA -,tea 0 U4~ d q,UG O N Ocd q aE-1 "C q ~ U F?I 9 cc330 NO ' q O O q g P. a7 ?bb as Gx~ a~ O H I ?N b-0 O N "IQ ID O U, azi 100 q 0 8 ?o c q c: a> w O a-~ G O 0 ??q 'd '~ a0i'~ q q r~i ~w r~ o b O H ti y H ~ F DVS H a a~B N H O ~+ U2 FP bI apq Oq O H N 4 0 b410 F. m qb cl ?0 0 d 41 0 ai q ?' v bA~~ O CD 06 U d ~m ?IV. Gl C7 4. ?N o O k bf) O'er q H U O U q0p "o bUyQ' qQq . 45 02 4 o ? ~q H'~ H ri COJ GG O P N 0 ~b o yP~ Eo ''O" O c8 Rw O H 0 2 V R"q a .0 abO F? m? m F,d F. M -, 0 cg ~o~bnq bb b N m. q F F H q O CJ O `~ q H aq R N o P a) W4-mobp bD ab iya 0 0 'a2 O q ~ ' S. ~w m O Qi F m 0 y qo U 0 a.~ U 0 ~ tiw 0 O+ 01 m m gwzy U y C 0 ID b b 4-y U b)D p F 4 0 R Cl) q 03 g N q F. ri R4 eoi "4L O'F H 0 0 O 01 b ! O . H w ~ o.,- a qp 0 o D q3- C3 0 0 o a M 01 q 0 a 0~a0R 01 ~a O U O ri~0N0~ q Q1 v +, w Approved For Release 2000/06/13 : CIA-RDP78-04718A000500160005-6 Approved For Release 2000/06/13 : CIA-RDP7818A000500160005-6 i.7 0 w C) cc77 0? C bA VS y"~ O ,ter ^~'~ - F17 > a? F~aa F4 i. +1+~'gaa ))C) i3 0C) 0 a q bbJ goy Q O 'co .~e-i! Cy ~ 'CS Cr.) oU 'm' m i~ ~ do ggcdsa. .~'' bD 64^-' bA bp ' m pG y "" i q N W Eq O m N~ -S 41 ~ q O O o I pO 44 c E 0. G)O ~ bp~ .. q A ~ Py o O ~tiq M?~ q bD am -0 ~4 ~ Q1 y ? . za O O ~ q N ~~ V ? 0 ^r : . q 2 7 V w C q O . 0 0!5 2 y 0 47 `j ;~~ bA m A . cad N N ?- C)0C qrf m~q ?N o ?~ V U ~ G gZ a q g m '~ C> ~ .o f, +~ a F P v cd?7 oqa m C1 m ~ o N .?S gaFrq m~~'y_ "m~ 0 00 Q- bqD N ' ~ W 0 q 'vs O C1~ CS a q m? Ow q O N 0 00 O# m O w '"V 0 4~a F~ . Fi ar 00 10 q 60 0 CS ? N ,a. tiA. d Gi acid cdC>.~, O H Fi V+i F P. co ti t1 q m Q o iJ ?N N N Fw .~,: r0a G VO m ?p7 ti 04--4 Q"P.0 0 o #~ ,w '~r~ b q3 O q qy p'q q G$ oa C~Cnm 4~;L mom q O Fcad C) -- '0 Py a?~ G~ U F 04 N F+ T1 ? O 6q.0 F v2 O 'Zi I ?~ 00 bow 91 q q 0 eiC) C ' p g w ~ dl v.n Ca 02 ro 2, ?N q2 ? q U 0 O Fi V O q q O 4 N F 0p C w O O U Ci C) c i C) 12.&:j q.0 C) 12 V y ~ 0 E C) td V.yw W 0 cd C ~O R o 0. 00 C) C3 cq m 06 ri rl ~?ti 0 mq m C).0 ? UIC Q 0,2 cd N w ?b q ~-~ r-I 12 Approved For Release 2000/06/13 : CIA-RDP78-04718A000500160005-6 Approved For Release 2000/06/13 Ovbp ? - .! ^d o o .F I N o N~ off d H on C3 , ID y.Q ~ ~- 01 0 bA p H y'?@ y j' ~ b' ~ q O ~ q Pa 9~ C 0 .~, ? N bA bOA ? qQ w ++++II N a0 y 0 0 qC ?.. O FA r. bD? q ul 'U 0 ~0 ?o aHi v, d' ,m II1!IN oa "0;8 ~S 0 y? o~ q~ q v C) p'N q m:~j 0 a g m 11 bj F 0 U , ads 0 O pH-, cd ,p m A q cd ai O O F.~ V y, H N g H ? *' b0.0 ,.~?d ~?R,'P q e?R.m O G> ~. d y 00 y 4 'm c~ cd:~ P, y a ~+.~ o cd A g m O N.,., H a~. y ~'c t d p 0bn wacd ~` ~I:Wo~~e , 0 0 bDO"D69 bnoy,; ena +^=a? y, bn ~~ami ~~v~?~ I by??+~bA Qajygbp ~~~ .-Pi 'C1bOA~A ? 0~ OUH P. w 0 0~ 0 bAhO?y?~ y 0+' o q uc~ H cj O ff. 0q`. O.D G. 0 O O O O Q 440 -P z (D 4 0b0 .Q bp?s aoR'og m y R7 N rJ , . O H N Ze 11 bl, 00 a -~ A.~q M U~ o P y y (D 0 13 -W 0 m o m~ owl q ?- a v I N H C1 H a '0 H m 0 01~ P. tl R~ Q+ r2 H H ~ V Ga .., H w ugl- 0 P4 0 ~^s? ~ Fr RO 41 t~! P, N 1 1 HDg iy~"C1 Rmr~y 2 C a a a .u n N O 0?b +L 0 cd~IH 0 Q N A's -S U >w aOcdcd'Ca3a> + b ~ o v 11 ce 0~ -p 0 w(D 0 0~0 cd A n 0 bA bD~ Gd Q3 ~ ~ H 0 1 F, ? H I I 1= -F- 1 1 o? e, CS0'0~0Ca ~o3P aC0a H FOi O b pti `4. CS bp 0 c ~q orb p q p+~ c0, F' H ccwdd O .C! b0 ? H O F v H 0 0 _ .0 b?ti aHi pl"0 s?, 0^ Oa dw a> qw NOS F"O a3 .11 .C aa+3~i N ',3 qEq H Cd b ,= H '~ m471 F a O q CB N 02 -64 03 0 ?4 ~.m ?4 m 0 d H m E~I 03 HwOa3,.~ 0~v _ 0 41 ym0 00~y,~ ~mG bA U2 0 oe~ ~~cd~PAm aHA Approved For Release 2000/06/13 : CIA-RDP78-04718A000500160005-6 I Approved For Release 2000/06/13 : CIA-RDP78-04718A000500160005-6 . I o~q o p b A' v? o y cma ?' g ti b ammw o 0 14 C., oP. cdq bfl I~. bf1-+a m- ? a+~ Fw vi ca bDw' "d- F L2,m P+~ bDgW F a`" i~ F' ?i' m m ?Ty o Pp f.,0 00m~y d~.Cc?.?'~~,m.b ?bDb.~"~y,c0.^Q '~P,d?~ ?~C).O bAV~~ .QG a'F ?~'N q o Ix p' + m R s~ ~. m Fyy w d PI (IN, c) m (1) 4 0' W 14 7~ o~ol,odq 0 boas ~~~~ 0~do bl) v qG Oo C Fai m yca~cd CS0 v .6 w 4AI ~.~F