CAREER SERVICE COMMITTEE WORKING GROUP ON EMPLOYEE RATING MINUTES OF 2ND MEETIING 23 OCTOBER 1951 1:30 P.M.

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP78-03578A000300050048-0
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 2
• Document Creation Date: December 12, 2016
• Document Release Date: November 8, 2001
• Sequence Number: 48
• Publication Date: October 30, 1951
• Content Type: MIN

Approved For *0 2002/01/07: CIA-RDP78-035780050048-0
ECURl1Y IHORIATIflN
or
FI
25X1A
30 October 1951
CAREER SERVICE COMMITTEE
l'Torking Group on EMPLOYEE RATING
Minutes of 2nd Meeting 23 October 1951 1:30 P.M.
Sec./Career Service Committee
1. The minutes of the first meeting were approved as distributed.
2. The Working Group first considered whether the rating system
should be separate from the system of evaluations. As a tentative measure,
it was agreed that these two should be treated separately.
3. The Working Group next considered whether it was necessary to
adopt more than one system of Performance Rating to meet the requirements
of the different components of the Agency. It was tentatively agreed to
limit the discussion to consideration of a single system. In view of this
decision, consideration of job families in connection with Performance
Rating was laid aside with the realization that this problem would again
arise when the Working Group considered Evaluation of the employee.
). There was considerable discussion of the manner in which job
descriptions, or statement of duties and responsibilities, would be related
to the performance rating. In view of the tentative status of job descrip-
tions, the flexibility of personnel assignments, and the policy restricting
distribution of job descriptions, it was tentatively agreed that the system
would include a requirement that the rater and the employee indicate whether
the job description had been consulted. There would be no requirement,
however, that the job description be consulted, if it inadequately described
the actual duties. If the job description was not used in the process of
rating, the rating official would give an explanation for failing to do so.
25X1A
5. - was requested to bring to the next meeting a revised
Performance Rating Form based on the above discussions and on the Report,
dated 1)4 June 1950, of the CIA Efficiency Rating Committee.
COM"I
0G AL
0
Approved For ReI as 2002/01 : CIA =RD 8-03578A000 8-
 Approved For "e 2002/01/07: CIA-RDP78-035700050048-0
6. It was agreed that at ,the next meeting the Working Group would
consider Evaluation Systems 'd the relationship of evaluation to job
families.
7. It was agreed that the next meeting would be held on Thursday,
1 November 1951, at 1:30 P.M.
8. The meeting adjourned at 3:45 P.M.
25X1A
25X1A
Approved For Release 2002/01/0.7 ::IA-RDP7803578A000300050048-0