BI-WEEKLY PROPAGANDA GUIDANCE

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP78-03061A000200080005-8
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 51
• Document Creation Date: November 16, 2016
• Document Release Date: March 2, 2000
• Sequence Number: 5
• Publication Date: July 27, 1964
• Content Type: REPORT

Approved For Release 2000/04/14: CIA-RDP78-03061A000200080005-8
25X1C1Ob
Next 1 Page(s) In Document Exempt
Approved For Release 2000/04/14: CIA-RDP78-03061A000200080005-8
 Approved For Release 2000/04/14: CIA-RDP78-03061A000200080005-8
27 July l Brie. 221'y Noted
t )3u r Co -nit niss:a. Says Lust-rim 'or ei 'n Minister
Si eah in; at a 4 July me,atinv; of Munich's Catholic Academy,
Austrian Forei n Minister Dr. 3runo Xreis%y said that the practice
of ez-panty ira trade with Corakaunist countries could not alter basic
Co=-amist designs. During discussion of "The Policy of Detente,"
Dr. ",rreis,y stated that "developments in the con-wanist countries
of J:;astern Europe do not constitute a developuent avv ,y -toga
Cott.:aunim~n but are Zleye op en s w tin the omiun s t Ori5:1'46.
:or.tnentin on the itIoscovr-pe!,r,1n0 rift, Dr, ! rei s .y stater]
that "only with thle beginning of this conflict did the .last
recognize the crow-?ny polycentrism within the Soviet 3loc.
This conflict has international importance because these two
Corauaun1st super- states have different opinions on the best wa,,
to co::?.aY?atnniwe the world. And that's all this conflict i eans
ea ll , " the minister added.
On the evolution of pO1ycent-r1su in the 3ast :floc, 11:reisL~:y
jtwl ed tidat all dapenCls on Tthrushchev's successor. "$f the
successor, whoever he is, does not have to :pace rivals, the
desta linization, t?Ii ah has nothing in cotton with denmoc . atimation
jai h t continue. :3ut if the successor Ce s into -rouble h3 V1121
r etur l to a sy teas of terror, thouZh it riay be camozfla;;ed by
alleg,ed ideolo/ica.l necessities. In this case a 'ciath - 0ucow
rapprochement cou_k occur very qt7 c aly .
On the policy tovaarf Cou aunisr, the minister stated that
thae .'; a st shoulc: cleat with the Cortsiuni! sts - -politically lly aaac;
econotl rally - but in all dea1in; s the 47est should insist on
"rthe de aocra ti.c presence)" antl shoulL 1 never i o7.rget the fact that
it is dealing with 'Communists and that "there were no means to
chain e Communists. "
This expression from the Fore- r, P;1if4.st3r of a neutral
country having 1230 h-iiomet?res of cormoL. frontier with Co_,:munist
Bloc countries is a clear remincaer of facts which the Vr ee World
tend to forget. Hatter East-West relations and increased
1 ast-:Zest e,-changes may tend in various ways to erode the des-
potic pourers of Cor -aunist dictators over their subjects. The
visible effects of this erosion fro 4i below are not to he k:aistaJ:en:
as a change in thae purpose or intent of such dictators.
Approved For Release 2000/0014 : -030'tQO?5-8
 Approved For Release 2000/04/14: CIA-RDP78-03061A000200080005-8
27 July lean:
i3r,iof iy Noted
The Competition of Ideas -- Inside the Bloc and Outside
While visiting Tokyo recently, Anastas iikoyan spoke to
an audience of Japanese university students. He told theca (and
his remarks were carried by Tokyo television) : "I becarie a
Marxist after reading not only Marxist books, but also anti-
Marxist and bourgeois books," The more anti-Marxist books he
read, Mikoyan said, the stronger had become his conviction of
the truth of Marxism.
Such are the advantages of having been an Old Bolshevik,
educated under the Tsars. Today the Soviet regime does its
best to shield young Soviets from such two-sided reading. Vihen
ravdla printed a report of Mikoyan's Tokyo speech the next day
(5 tay), the statement quoted above was omitted. Mikoyan of
course intended to show the Japanese a supposed Soviet readi-
ness for a free comparison of ideas. He would not have made
2b)l V 6te'nents in the USS1a.
Approved For Release 2000/04/14: CIA-RDP78-03061A000200080005-8
S ! - U1 414 mr~ (Briefly Noted)
 Approved For Release 2000/04/14: CIA-RDP78-03061A000200080005-8
D97 :3S O V ~1fi?1~ SCAiT A Ii7 T: t S'$
12 Aug European Youth Congress, 12-13 August, Last Berlin.
13 Aug Third anniversary of The Wall, sealing East-West
Berlin border.
16 Aug Cyprus becomes fully independent (under agreement
signed 19 February 195 ending 4-year conflict). 1960.
17 Aug Alliance for Progress Charter signed by US and 19 L.L.
countries (all except Cuba), Punta del Este. 1961.
23 Aug Interparliafnentary Union Conference, 53rd, Copenhagen,
23-23 August.
23 Aug USSR. and Hitler's Germany conclude Ton-Aggression
Treaty, 1939.
apt International Union of Students (IUS) Congress, Ibadan,
Nigeria, 3-13 Sept.
4 Sept Socialist International Centennial Congress, 4-3 Sept,
Brussels. [First International founded, 23 Sept 1364]
3 Sept USSR, Czechoslovakia and Poland refuse to sign peace
treaty with Japan, concluded with 43 nations, 1951.
9 Sept 13th Pugwash Conference on Science and World Affairs
in Cechos1ovau,ia, 9-12 in Prague and 13-19 in
afar lovy Vary.
9 Sept Chinese People's "Liberation Army" enters Lhasa, Tibet,
1050.
13 Sept 11 World Youth Forum sponsored by the Committee of
Youth Organizations of the USS1 (CYO), Moscow, 13-23
Sept.
17 Sept USSR invades Poland, annexes eastern half of country,
1939. Twenty-fifth anniversary,
1s Sept Wee, of International Struggle Against Fascism and
War (Communist) 19-26 Sept.
21 Sept People's Republic of China proclaimed, 1949.
Approved For Release 2000/04/14: CIA-RDP78-03061A000200080005-8
 Approved For Release 2060/04/141: CIA-RDP78-03061AO00200080005-8
PPP ~'T~l1 a v G TID2 { TO CO La ITI a Disasii s,
aaacApOmv JR ' Ref Sc? 24OQ&Q 4e
Princ;,pal Developments:
1. The 'C-5
~I conli~,=aec,1 its anterat to push ahead with
preparations for a world conference by publishing on 15 July
the text of a 7,000word letter which it had sent to the CCP on
lv June in reply to the .7 May CCP letter (the last of the series
of 7 published by the Chinese .on 3 May). Obviously aimed beyond
the CC? :eadezPL-ip to the reluctant leaders of other parties,
the letter argues that a world conference is needed n o w
--
to discuss the many important-changes in the outside world in
the 6 years since the last meeting as well as to overcome the
difficulties in the moveraent. It attempts to establish the
right of the CPU to take the initiative in convoking one (cit-
aa Had rose a In support), declares tae right of all parties
attending the 1357 gnu 1063 meetings to participate --
and to decide in conference whether any new participants h~shou'l d
be invited, and focuse,.i aediat.e attention on convening a pre-
p,aratopy raeett ng of the .,u part es non na -ed by the 1363 conr'-
ence to ca resolution. It concludes with the flat de-
claration that no party can hinder the convocation of, or uni-
laterally dictate terms for a conference. Unconfirmed repots
state that the U distributed copies of this letter or a sun-
Mary of it to ot+aer parties on 15 June. And it has been con-
firiied that hhhrushchev will gather with Go uM:a, Novotny and
Ulbricht in Warsaw on the occasion of the 20th anniversary of
the establishment of "People's Poland," 22 July, Meanwhile, the
Soviet propaganda machine concentrates on the anti-Chinese of-
fensive, with Pravda contributing at least one item alaost daily,
with Izvestiya,"' oraturnaya Gazeta, Partiynaya ghizn (Party
Life), 11[ow-iunist an publications-77 'less authority-
u or y contributing
other raa? era , an; a heavy boradcastthg schedule.
2. The s littin in the Japanese CP described in #32 has
now developed into o en warfare,with rai-e WSJ
publishing two
strong letters it had, sen o the JCP and ~' he JCP publishin ac-
cusations of Soviet interference in-Their internal affairs.
(See Chrono, July 5 and continuing.)
3. The Chinese CP published a 23,033word denunciation of
"thae revisionist 1 hrus,achev clique" and its "phoney Communism, "
the DTE-7-n- he series of joint eople's Dail a ag comnents
OR-
on t e open e eir? of the C?SU.17 Amplifying on its previous re-
buttal of the Soviet line that a "state of the whole people "
has replaced the dictatorship of the proletariat in the USSL1,
it charges that the i hrushchev clique has replaced' the dictator-
ship of the proletariat with that of its own "privileged stratum,"
 Approved For Release 2000/04/141: CIA-RDP78-03061A000200080005-8
(Commentary Cont.) , r
the masses who ark ~lsa~ et:~" cai1' oppozed to them. In a strangely
defensive turn a t t&~,e end, however, the article indicates a
mortal fear -- "a ,matter of life and death for our party and our
country" -- lest Chinese cadres become "corrupted and demoral-
ized" by such rev ,sioFa.'y st ideas and "the whole of China change
its color."
14, The unexpected visit. of the high-level Maurer-led
Rttc aniaa delegation to Moscow, on July 6 ender: with a joint com-
munique on the l Leh which mentioned better mutual understanding
but said notbj of any agreements reached. Meanwhile, the u
Soviet-c strolled, multi-language _!Problems of Peace and Socialism
for July 'published a lQn account, without comment, of ? 3e long
22 April 11umanian "declaration of independence" statement (July
9) -- just as it i ,,,?,;i reported , d (without confirmation as yet) that
the 1umanians have stopped { participation in the 217&4 operation.
51 it is cpe.culate that the death on July 1-1 '11 r nch CP
Chair :aan Thorea might lead to some relaxation of that party's
ri i! d pro-Soviet stance .
S. The C?NJ obtained statements of general alignment
auains$ the CCP line from delegations to Moscow of two of the
worl111's most militant "socialist" parties; the left-wing group
split f o ,a the Italian SP (July u 9) and the Japanese SP
147 lam).
7. The Si no-Covje.t battle continues to disrupt the ac-
tivities of the international fronts: dur n; h,s period con-
flicts erupted in meetings of the . 30 standing secretariat
., (July 11) and the VTF e.aecutirve co xiiittee (July 14).
S;~~ni icance:
The C?SJ is attempting once more to seize the initiative in
international Comm alst, affairs, bola in its long campaign to
convene a world . oa' fere ace and its new s rive to overthrow the
pro-Chinese leadership of the Japanese CP. With the publication
of its l June letter to the C.CP, the C?SU has emphatically as-
serted its right as well as its intent to proceed immediately
with preparations for cpnvol:i.?;? a conference along the lines it
has previously proposed. The Soviet case would seem to male it
very difficult for any "fraternal" party to refuse to participate,
no matter what may be the misgivings regarding the consequences.
It remains to be seen whether these fighting words will be fol-
lowed by equally militant acti, ns.
Meanwhile, there is no evidence of any Soviet progress in
brining the principal hold-ous among the major parties any
closer to support for such a conference, -- but the formula
stated in the above letter would obviate the Yugoslav problem
by limiting participation, at least initially, to those who
participated in the l 57 and lZ*J meet'
Approved For Release 2000/04/14'': CIA-RDP78^-sd3061A000200080005-8
 Approved For Release 2000/04/14 CIA-RDP78-03061A000200080005-8
(Cori,aentary Cont.)
The CPSv ip open Tila l-q!, irTL a AU4a ins k+ the l c? .eiders hip must be
consaderecl a great Zanable, based' on the assuapt.ion that a siz-
able b11a ority o." tile 1ea in q cadres are either inclined toward
the Soviet line or susceptible to Soviet carrot-and-stick treat-
ment. 1i this should grove to e true ansl the Chu Mould be
able to unsex $hp pro-Chinese leaders and prim the party bad :
into the soviet-a~.i ;need cazip, it would be a great, feat -- but we
remain skeptical
Meanwhile, the detailed 'and heavily docuaented Chinese
char ,e of the degeneration o~ the dictatorship of the pro].e-
tariat into a ' cl i ctatorsx4p of the self-serving "reel Class" in
the USSR is a docc: vent, o, hi h importance, paralleling in many
respects the chases of disillusioned former believers such as
M?lovan D j has - thou ;I~ taeChinese draw the opposite conclu-
s?ons. lncid9ns a .1y, gale might note that the statements of
gent-ra . alianr ent With the CU . by two important socialist
parties mentioned above could be taken to confir-ni the t .e ie of
a recent (April 7, Chro'no #27) Albanian Zeri I ?op, unit editori-
al: 'The Modern TZevi s~o jstq o whe ?atha cial 5350crat-ic
Degeneration and of a 1ter er with Social Democracy."
25X1C10b
 Approved For Release 2000/04/14: CIA-RDP78-03061A000200080005-8
25X1C10b
Approved For Release 2000/04/14: CIA-RDP78-03061A000200080005-8
 Approved For Release 2000/04/14: CIA-RDP78-03061A000200080005-8
: C01&4M1IST D ISS"INTS XO It
#33
4.17 July 10u4
July 3-3 : The first national conference of the Indonesian CP
in .ja=ar^ta July 3-0 adopts io resolutions on international
affairs and 12 on internal. One of the former states:
'Tire absolute condition for holding an international
conference of all the Connunist and workers parties is to
make efforts to solve the differences of views and arrange
bilateral tats between' the fraternal parties with a most
objective attitude and the greatest possible patience....'A third plenary Kssiot of the P1I/CC on July G : Chair-
man Aidi V'r sp h calls on all nembe o make utmost efforts
to be...good stuieats, of Mara, Engels, Lenin, and Stalin." ?eh-
ing press publishes the speech on the llth,
July and Continuin The split in the Japanese CP (see Ch ono
#U,, June U an con inuing) has developed into open warfare
between the leaderships of the C?SU and JCP, as demons eo by
e fo ow ng even~,s:
--On ~, ^ '~ % "The Tragedy Must Not Be fepeated I, " a long
article by V. alentinov on the Japanese people's support of
the test-ban treaty, despite the fact that "the pe :in ; preachers
are constantly striving ' to implant in Japan their erroneous view
on the Moscow treaty' to dell a blow to the nuclear disarmament
novenent, and to pro~iagandite their concept 'without trousers
but iivh the nuclear bomb.'" "Moreover, there are people in
Japan who compulsively become Peking's mouthpieces ....
o to mark the O's 42nd
On Oth, at a 'central raAy in '1!o%y
anniversary, -TecyGen Miya ioto condemns "the betrayal by Shiga
and others" who "mai itained contact with certain foreign forces?
and are "plotti Z to ' or ganize a. reVisionis party." T e also
deplores "some Coarmuriis t parties w c are bins y subservient
to a certain influential Communist party in the world."
t+. .There is a certain foreign Corvmunist party which
is trying to justify the anti-Party activities of Shiga
and others and to interfere in the internal problems of
our part- ?
Miyanoto says that "..As for the convening' of an inter-
national conference in the future," the JCP sincerely hopes that
an international conferened Will be held in order to realize the
true unity of the ICU, --but says nothing of the conditions for
one (according to a summary published in JC? daily A lta on
July ln)
3tla pravda's antic?e by ye. Alehseyev on "the first
_.
tt
.e. .s rw..J.~ - - -
i "a"" Sbiga and- Co]. it quotes extensively from a statement y
-3- n.._- 1
 Approved For Release 2000/04/14: CIA-RDP78-03061A000200080005-8
(Chronology Cont.)
the editors: "Ttiiaon-llo ixoe intends to become the read, repre-
sentative o,J. YV R7C1? ... `/
-- On lCth,Tlo. 14 of 'the CPU biwee,ly journal Partiynaya Zhizn
(Party Life) publishes CPSU letters, date 10 April and- _11 July
~n t E C -- can no 1317,75F leave the
y in ignorance to t ~e JCk ,~ saying that 1t 4
a ` of the situation "when the leadership of the
JCL , ...increases attacks on the C SU, ...refuses to undertake
any steps whatsoever to el.min4te the dif-Zerences with the CPSU
and declines to oisc,ass our,, comr,wdely proposals on this matter."
"The JC? delegation [earlier this year (see Chrono 24, Play^^h
13) ] avoided franI: tall: and refused to d~,scuss questions ox
joint struggle against our 'Common enemy -- world imperialism --
and of the concerted l ne o~ action in the most important ques-
tions of our time, After the talks the JC73 delegation refused
to sign any joint corgwanique, with the CP SSU,"
Because . 9, this eltuatton, "and being alarmed by the fact
that the JCP leader ship began more and more openly to retreat
from the agreed line of the, %CM,11 the C?SU sent their 10 April
letter proposing joint efforts to solve differences.
11r't
The C;?SU/CC expresses deep regret that even after
this letter the JC? le 4ers,...embar4 ed on the road of fur-
t aer aggravation of red atio as with the CLSU, to a course
aimme~.d at an open rupture with the CPSU and the 1CM.11
In conel.din;, Mae 11 July letter charges that the 11_30 April
letter has not yet been discussed in the JCP/CC or the Presi,: iu_:m.
-- On lCth (according to press reports), a JC'P statement re-
l.?es directly to the Soviet Charges, accusing the CPU ,~ of seek-
n to disrupt the internal ac* iy es of the jc,?, of having
given active support to ahi a and Suzuki, and asserts that the
Soviets themselves are responsible for the conflict which has
arisen.
Jul 3: At an informal press conference on board a Danube
s ~. at Vipnna, Rumanian -First Deputy Premier Apostol, head
of the economic delega ion to Austria, acknowledged "normal"
differences with the $T"v , reaffirms 1 umanian opposition to
supranational control., and speaks of "improving CEM - statutes"
to permit non-Cot nunist cou4tries to join or associate them-
selves.
JuI & 7: Among the continuing flow of statements of support
^ e C- 1--W by other. parties reported in Soviet media, two are
of particular interest;
-- On :nth, Pravda carries an article by T;. Burnelle, Chairman
of the old- 11.u,e, a gia C? entitled "Failure of the Tlelgiann
Splitters," ti;uo 2n ; ro a a CCP message paying tribute to the
Approves Forelease 06ft/ : i -RDP78-03061A0002000~0005-8
a "'o
2 (Chronology Cont.)
 Approved For Release 2000/04/14: CIA-RDP78-03061A000200080005-8
(Chronology Cont.)
"17hy did the Chinese not inform us through normal
channels about the reasons for a change in their positions?
Why did they not write to us? Why did they not propose an
exchange of opinions through bilateral meetings?... They
tried to sow disarray in the party, to weaken the authority
of the Communist-chosen leadership, to create a deep split
in the ?arty to seize the levers of control. On failinL
this they wanted to split from the party a considerable
part of its member's and leaders to orient them mainly to-
ward anti-Soviet activities. These attempts ended in a
complete fj asco. tt
Burnelle asserts that "anti-Soviet policy is retreating
everywhere" and "the prestige'of the SU has never been greater,"
but he avoids any mention of the great question of a conference.
-- On 7th, No. 13 of party na*a Zhizn publishes, under the head-
ing "Loyalty to the Jointly leormula c1 General Line Must Be
preserved, tt an artI cle fron Ecuador signed by Fernandez (?) t'un-
masling the splitters and their inspirers who have emerged in
the ran ass of the ?'Cs. says:
t'CCP leaders cannot ...conceal their insidious inter-
ference in the af~a1rs ok our party. The case of Jose
Maria 2, our is wail-Itnowrn. At one time he was a seraber
of the PCL/CC. Scretly' lie traveled to . Pelzin where he
was given a large'suia of"money to start pro-Chinese propa-
ganda in Bcuador and to `support the extremist elements.
Upon returning from Peking he was arrested at the airport.
This was a signal for a campaign of repression against the
Co unists and the democrats. let even after this scandal-
ous affair the Chinese did not stop.... (They) did not
even stop short of such unsavory methods as blaclmail an'.
bribery."
Ju? 0 ez 9: Pass annoi ces that "CPSU leaders have met with a
cle:eg2:? on of the Italian Socialist party of Proletarian Unity
(militant left-wing spa rom enni s wh c as arrived
in the SU to re-establish traditional relations between the
Italian Socialists and , the CV`rJ." GenSecy Vecchietti led the
delegation in ''a 1rienc 1y meeting marl-ed by a spirit o pro-
letarian internationalise." On the Dtia radio Moscow broad-
casts in Italian an i .3tervievi with Vecc lietti in which he says:
'r7e consider the Ohinese 'Communists' attitude tD be wrong asmuch from
ass roti the political point of
the ideo point of -~ vievi mess as
9t
and ..e s ecilacall? discu the Chinese attitude
view l
~.ogica~., assessment of t!ostern capatalis.a~ their opinion on nuclear
~ nuclea.r
Sear, and their evaluation of Stalin.
July 7: Pravda reviews Prole. S. L. Tikhvins?,y's new boo'.. Sun
an yore to Political Views and Practice favorably, as -h
red Fighter or {r en? s p 13 e ern t Me wov et and Chinese
60
Foo Wgfeitffi 04fr4 ftbF *Mb%1 b200080005-8
(Chronology Cont.)
 Approved For Release 2000/04/14: CIA-RDP78-03061A000200080005-8
(Chronology Cont.)
"...the Chinese leaders, ignoring their international
duty and consigning Sun Yat-sen's behests to oblivion,
have deve oped propaganda hostile to the US RSA ...
Moscow's Literaturnaya Gazeta article by N. Gribachev,
"The Splitters from Peking," tells "why we Soviet writers
...consider it necessary to express our attitude... toward the
line which the CCP leaders are trying to force on the entire
Communist movement. Referring to Peking Radio ("constructed
with the assistance of the SU"), he writes colorfully:
"The impression of these broadcasts is that of an endless
stream of intellectual garbage which is a mixture of
fabrications and conjectures, of primitive judgements and
groundless emotional outbreaks, of unctious phrases about
equality of rights and obviously vain aspirations to the
role of hegemonic power, phrases about peace and thinly
veiled appeals to adventures.... Do the Chinese leaders
realize in what world and in what century they are living?"
July 8: Pravda carries an article by P. Dolotov on how Chinese
u trarevo ut onary phrases are frequently at odds with their
deeds." "No denial has come from Peking," for example to
Western speculation about impending establishment of diplomatic
relations between Lisbon and Peking. The author then looks
at Macao, which, as` he puts it, throws "some light on the rea-
sonsor Peking's peculiar tolerance far the Salazar re mime."
j y 9: Pravda publishes a dispatch from its Peking correspond-
ence yuzadzhyan about the report of First Secy Hu Yao-pang to
the Ninth ngress of the Chinese Young Communist League, 11-29
June:
"...The Congress was used as a rostrum for casting
aspersions onrSoviet Youth, the Leninist Komsomol, the
Soviet people, and the CPSU.
...Chinese youth will hardly draw any inspirationsfrom the
report's thesis that 'the period of transition from social-
ism to Communism will evidently last for five, ten, or even
more generations.' It was not so long ago, however, that
the Chinese 'leaders said quite the opposite: the 'realiza-
tion of Communism in our "country is not a thing of a dis-
tant future.' Such swings from one extreme to another
breed only uncertainty and speak of a lack of principle
on the'part of the Chinese leaders."
The multi-language Problems of Peace and Socialismfor July
publishes a long account o he long 22 April Rumanian CC "de-
claration of independence" statement, without rebuttal or comment.
The last group of Chinese workers in Mongolia departed,
L A 8-03061A000200080005-8
.! nnn'i nrrv ~nt .
 ,Approved For Release 2000/04/14: CIA-RDP78-03061AO00200040005-8
(Chronology Cont.).
Jul 10: Pravda article by "noted Soviet economist" Lev Leontyev
on as capi Ea st trends in the USSR. A Tass s w ar?a reports:
"? .T ae Pe?:in~n leaders, for instance, attach the
principle of material, incentives and concern for the peoplelb
welfare, depictin these major features of socialist economy
as evidence of you:: j eois degeneration. The purpose of these
attacks is to dptract spu'blic attention from the, apparent
economic failurep of t 4e Chinese leadders.,..,,the Chinese
leaders are tryin to,present want as a virtue...."
July 10-11: Chinese Premier Chou Un-lai and a'orei gn Hinister
an U na;:e an eeted 2-day visit to Pui? a,r~njust 13 dais
after soviet Deputy Prenier Aikaoyan was here., he joint coil-
raunique stated, inter alias that the two leaders "agreed that a
conference on the Lapt.an problem of the 14 Geneva a; ree:ient
powers should be convened,"
July 11: Izvestiya's article, "Peking's y also Tone," by h[.
x, cites facts to demonstrate that :,hind=s nor gn ayd is
low in ouantit and ualit - . The USSR and other caul countries
are re c e ing economic. an ,,technical assistance to 4~ develop-
in countries -- AA , sian, 18 African, and 11 Latin Aneri a:' --
while the CPk ren4erp aid -4o 18, 8 Asian and 13 African. Where-
as the cPr~ 1e1ping these countries to build a hundred fa-
cilities, the CEP,!! countries are building 1,223 various plants
and facilities. :eat industrial enterprises built with C? Z
assistance are less t.ho.n 2'Q% of the total, whereas they made u?
50% of Soviet ass st oe , ,Ioreover, "non-observance of aids
schecdu3.es by the Chinese has become a co ' aon thing." Projects
have fallen viay behind schedule in TTepal, Guinea, Canbodia, Bu Fa
and lnc'onesia. Thus,, 'but of the 103 projects which the C7
Govt pled ed to build, there have actually been built only five
industrial plants, three hospitals, and a few facilities." Worst
of all, the plants supplied by the CPII often fall shoat of inter-
national stai da ; c:s, Last year the CPL was forced to give up
buildin a metallurgical plant in Cambodia because the survey-
ing tivor?; done by Chinese specialists was very inferior.
Pravda .carries a ,arti,cle by its Cairo correspondent based
on"an ar' 'Ole in 41 a'aou the spl.tters' efforts to sow
discord in the 3;asp l-e, peace fighters." It says that the
n~Q stanc~in c secretariat received invitations to participate
in jo an ,-n ti~ e - e one conferences in Japan, one in To'.-yo
and one 11, , ` rya and accepted bo E.
"The Ci ,ne a anti ;apanese representatives, however, ummexpect-
edly. spoke against participation in the Hiroshima confer-
ence ofl e groan s that it is bein organized by 'Japanese
react ,onary forces in concert .with international. ir, parial-
i st . t , a, . The J ..anese representatives on the stanc; in;;
secretariat, ; awa awa and his wife, hreatened' the Soviet
re rose itat ve that the Japanese ilationa. Council for the'
Approv tY b6(1 its
nvitat. on..to the .u 'U is attend the ,oho coil ernnce 737
else chappions supported the Uirosbina Meet _xig."
 Approved For Release 2000/04/14: CIA-RDP78-03061A000200080005-8
(Chronology Cont.)
Literaturna?Ta Gazeta carries a lone; article by S. IS i nov
against the unser-OPUI-OUS literary critics of the Chinese
raagwzine Wen l-pao, who are deliberately distorting the facts
of Soviet reality."
death o : ailing I reach Cp Chaiwr_.aan Thorez (on l a Soviet
xl
ae
liner) is seen by co aen Ito ^s as possibly press inu a relaxa-
tion of the PCFts r igi=:l support of a CL'J-style conference.
July 13: Tokyo daily Asahi thiimbun reports that Vlao told the
.panese Socialist deleLation under S sa%i which had spent two
weeits in Mina (see Chrono #32, June 27/23) : "Communist China,
in principle, is in favor ol"Japan's deraancl to the Soviet Uon
for the return of I. -norther-as an ds. Jiao was also quo t.e :
as say. n that occupied cons erable land" in the A.raur
region and in 2a: t Europe.
Pe%ine people!-s Daily devotes 4 pa-;es to encerpts frogn,
recent Covfi e L anti 3ina statements, v th an editor's note.
In c~z e e iall1re s or -pri l, May and June this year show" that
the soviet press has published "more than 1, 33'0 articles and
other items atta'c -.iig China. These attacibs, or, to be enact,
slander and fabrications, are, as before, len ;thy, rancid, and
e.ctre_.iely preposterous . ""
July 14: The Chinese p,aayis~ another in the series of joint,
27-2 1 is Dai1y/raecl Fla- articles: a 3 1". arus be hev s ? rhoL1ey C o - and its ! ~:~.s cor c Lessons for the World -- Coraraon t. on
the Open Letter of the CC/CL U (IX) ." (See ez.tensive sun:a:.:aary
of this 23,333 wore? statement in the Ldclencla. a.)
The joint co=:unique at' the conclusion of the 3 i,' July
friendly visit to 'hie .soviet pion" o a h~ ;h-level liu ;ianiaan
.S. T.... d+ TtnM ~rrsa G923']r'(~
of opinions ooh place" on questions of t urianian-Soviet rela-
ollabora'c on
f
c
tions, y~7I -C?SU relations, current questions o
araonS socialist countries," the situation in the ICbI, and tile
struggle for peace, The meeting "tool: place in a cor=aradely,
sincere atr7osohe e conntrihuti ng to better ;:.autua1 understanding,"
4,
btwt nothi;l was sat:.", about any specific ac peen ent .
lass reports froba ?:.daiest on t~he "air:l .cious sand slanderous
atta,;,-.s on the General line of 7FDY at its executive cor.rmittea
meet's n :
"The Chinese delegate's outbursts aroused the indignation
ox meL1bei~s of tIde eec ative' cormai ttee and uaet with a ~ it-
tine; rebuff. De1e ate6 of youth organizations of the CIDD61
South Africa, Iran, France, Argentian and other countries
emphatically rejected his concoctions and conderanec the
disruptive ;policy of the Chinese leaders. Speakers sharply
criticized the at We: pt to convene a separate Afro As ian
Approved For Release 2000/04/14:
SIA-RDP78-03061 A( Qigq% 0 ,,t.)
 Approved For Release 2000/04/14: CIA-RDP78-03061A000200080065-8
(Chronology Cont.)
conference zaac'e last January by the Chinese leaders behind
the back of the 7i). Dalej,ates of Lebanon, the Sudan,
Senegal, and other African countries resolutely rebuffed
atteripts by the splitters to isolate the Afro Asian soli-
darity aiovauert, tear it avaay from the Thr Y, and subordi-
nate it to their special aims. ft
July lS No. 10 of the CPSU theoretical journal Xo .a ufti st
pu es the tent o.:'! a 7,000-word CPSU letter date ' =une
x'apl yi.ng to the CCP "::t ier of may 17, see Z!hron5 iP23 or
ear er Items In c -c e ter exchange), In a departure
parallelin Chinese practice, X o.nu list also publishes" the 7
May CCP letter. In contrast to the earlier CL-03U letters, this
is obviously written for readers other than the CCP leaders to
vil on it is addressed, polemically reef -firming,' the CPSU posi. tfon
vis-a-vis the CC'? aneh justifying its intent to call a world con-
ference without farther delay.
The letter beta rs by toiling the 'tDear C , araaes" ol the
CCp that in their 7 May letter they ttvirtually refuse to tteet
w the representatives of the parties...:' It asserts that "tphe
ove : whe1 ling . a ority o: the fraternal parties have declared
for conve'nine .a aseetin , without delay.,"" and that "as far as 'via
, the leadership oZ no party,with the exception of the CC?
Imo vi
and the Albanian Mori:ers Party, rejects the necessity for col-
lective measu 'es' to overcome the difficulties in the Cozffaun'lst
movement and prof note its unity."
Citing Ctp letters supporting a conference `in 1D62, 63 and
64, the letter says:
...you never ae?ow^e thou-ht seriously of a conference, any
tore than you do now, Because you cook not count on sup-
port foi iceol.ogical anc political platfof n in, a
world Co wan .st for,=...you are in fact afraid to attend
a world Corxiu alst conference....
Lithourcfi a.iz.itt na that-'the conference a;r not fully suc-
ceed in ar ~lvi.n at .a co:zraon view on all raat .ers," the C'?SU is
convinced that such an o itco a world not amount to a split,
given "eie::1Qnta ?y concern for unity,erance, and moo--'tai thy,
which the Communist 4:iovenent has a ri ;h - to expect Iron all its
contingsnts.
On the other hind, "4 years have pa.sse.1 since the last
world con-~:erende, tt a=: "many important changes have to C aen place
which require study, generalization, and conclusions."
"In the 1.1 ;;I:$ o.-f these taSkiS, the CC"?/Cc's proposal for
putting of `a &i wwbrld conference is particularly unacceptable.
All indications are- that the con: eronce is indispensable anc:,
the question of convening it cannot be shelved."
7 (Chronology Cont.)
Approved For Release X000/04114: CIA-RDP78-03061A000200080005-8
 Approved For Release 2000/04/14[: CIA-RDP78-03061 A000200080005-8
(Ch?onology Cont.)
Taking up the Chiriesip claizi that no one party has the
right to call . a co a: erenco now, the CPSU letter says that
"From the vievWpoinnt of the democratic principles on Fah; ch
the Communist .tnovenaept is. based, it must be recognized
that arty ors oup of parties is free to taz:e such an
.xa ~ e..~ .. The decision ac o ted by the 1J eeting
re as: 4-n ugt the CPU with the function ou convening
_eG' e, s ox i oraaun s a, a-n-ff wor_ par es in consu ta-
on with. the ,1772s, This decision was passed unanibaously,
with the CCP 4elegation participating, What is more
Co a :e ao tzuig....said that it is necessary to reco-
ni.e.. Le is , par y which should l; ace the initiative
in calling raeetinas."
Turnia to the question of the meeting's coraposition,
"V/e are of the opinion that all those parties which parti-
cipated in the,. 3nd 1x30 meetings, which signed their
documents, are entitled to participate in the con:2:erence.
.... Q theYcon erence . itself has a right to cleci e3
rte.. i i?
whether . an- nxyzpa._ Gicipan s shout: be i.nvi,ted. '?.3r :ng
. r r
in several couAtries parties which awee with and imple-
ment the general lins..,, Naturally those parties are
entitled to exaect an invitation to attend.... But when
the CQZI/CC poses tine question of inviting new participants,
41#.3t is thin!-..n not of those parties but of anti-party
factional groups which it has brought into being anc' which
it designates y the high-sounding name of parties....
No matter how Jtarc1 you try to represent those imposters as
revolutio4: axle , they are outside the Coramunis : raove:aent,
and no power on cart; can push thheun into its r-nks. "
The CT? sU rejects the {CCP s for .~ Proposal fO~ an agS^eellent on re-
ciprocal publishing of each other is polemics, saying: "Ho Con .-
munist party has ,ever un~,ertai:on to reprint, circulate, and
propagate slanderoup rna ei . a.1 alien to socialism,"
The CPSU concludes by reaffirminu Its position on a con-
ference:
su ?est
" that in he
a(!
agree inpprinc .eathat a iinee ng est iat be conve'e we we anshould
c:i
that it should, not be, put Off or 1one;, an as agreement
on its specific date as well as on its agenda and cora-
positi on shou1c be reached. througi? further consultations
with tlae frate"nal parties.
The C?SU/ C co ss ders that at the present stage the
gain e o rt s :qu .d be, concentrate l on hio sing a preparatory
con erence. 7e reiterate our proposal a,as ... i should
~~:teTl~e ~ y
Approvesla i e waNbOM tx, I '" C Elms
 Approved For Release 2000/04/14: CIA-RDP78-03061A000200080005-8
(Chronolozy Cont.)
Consider it necessary to reach a ree~~ent cri the fraternal
parties on the sped Li c date of such a conference in the
irnediate future.
06.11o party can, without breai:ino with international-
or unilaterally
ism, hinder the convocation of the i eetin
Lol
dicta e ter s un .er which such a xaeetin- nus be held."
9ravda publishes a joint statement by the high.-level
JaDan-e' sa ;'`o"cialist Party e e a ion eac ed by GenSecy iiarita,
cra? ch had oeen vit i in the since 29 June (see c hrono s; 0. ,
June 27/28), and the CPSISJ. As reported by Tass, the state.ient
said that, "ITottritlastanflin differences in views in the sphere
of ideology and some political problems, the positions of the
C7SU and the J mainly coincide on a nuriber of questions, spe--
cifically the struSoie for peace, democracy, and national in-
dependlence."
July 17: eves a iya compares statetients of the Chinese leaders
vrii 'extracts-' from cloc xnents of the CCP/CC made in the past fear
years to show "a sharp l33-degree about--lace on important ques-
tions of theory, policy, party and voveri ent practice." (As
reporter by Tass: text not yet available.)
(Chrono og y)
Approved For Release 2000/04/14 CIA-RDP78-03061A000200080005-8
 Approved For Release 2000/04/141: CIA-RDP78-03061A0002000 0005-8
Acdendum'to Chronology #33
summary of Chinese Joint People's ally/ ed la ; article dated
13 y l
lion Khrushchev's phony Comtaunism and its Fistorical I"ssons
for the t,iorld -- Cog ent oh the open Letter of the CC/C ?S J (I").
This argutnentaiiv8, repetitious 20,000word tract elabc-
rates on previous Chinese denunciations (see especially sections
17 and 18 of the 14-'June 1,033 CC' letter) of the Soviet line on
the replacement of the dictatorship of the proletariat in the
USSR by a "state of the whole people." It charges the "usu.!r-
pation of the leadership of the Soviet party and state" by the
"revisionist Khrushchev clique," and its replaceLent, under the
"signboard of to M aism," of the dictatorship of the proletariat
by a dictatorship of the Khrushchevian "privileged stratum",
which is "appropriating the fruits of the Soviet people's labor
and living the life of bourgeois lords" and "stands diametri-
cally opposed to the Soviet people" and "extremely antagonistic
to the masses of the population who comprise over 00% of the
world's pou1at-ion." It contains 73 footnotes to references --
Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Khrushchev and other recent Cl--,SU
statements, Soviet press reports, Rush,, Douglas-Tome, and J.7.
Dulles.
The text is grouped under six un-numbered headings, with
almost one-third of the total in the first section: "Socialist
Society and the ictatorship of the 'Proletariat .11 Marx and
Lenin are quoted on the need for continuing the dictatorship of
the proletariat ('. of _ over "a very, very long historical
.
stage" until the social revolution is complete and conditions
are ripe for the transition from socialism to communism. "Lenin
pointed out a'numberof times that ... (inter alia)...political
degenerates and new bourgeois elements may emerge in Ze ran s
and
o e cro Min . c ass an among government functionaries,
"life has"con irmeil these conclusions." Comrade Mao points out
that "the complete' victo:cy of socialism cannot be brought about
enerations; to resolve this question thoroughly
in one or two g ~
requires live or ten enera.tions or even longer." In fact,
o?Iy ay emancipating all man n can -the pro etariat ultimately
Stalin, "a great Marxist-Leninist," . errec when, tii.-uLL uW
foreign experience to go-by," he "Prematurely declared... that
there were 'no longer antagonistic classes Tn the Soviet
Union a`n 7 : that it `Bras 'free of class conf l.icts. ' The article
then cites' iu""accounts fion the current Soviet press of the
operations of bour`;eois elements in the US SR, such as the manag-
er of a furniture factory in Kharkov who set up an "illegal
knitwear worltshop" and carried on secret operations in the
factory, accumulating "several wives, several cars, several
houses," etc.
Approved For Release 2000/04/14: CIA-RDP78-03061Ad000200, 8000a
(Aciden um on inuec
 A r I 000/04/14: CIA-RDP78-03061A000200080005-8"`
"Thus, ntis9c a1jst activities are nothing if not the
sharp class $t;;ugg1e of the bourgeoisie against the pro-
s nothing ter- i fying about this so long
as the leadership the party and stake remains Marxist-
Leninist. Batt ?in the Soviet Union today, the gravity of
the s,it tatioA lies in the fact that the revisionist Khru-
shc1 ev clique has usurped the leadership of the Soviet
party and state and, that a privileges' bourgeois stratum
has emerged in Soviet society.
The nezzt section, headed "The Soviet Privileged Stratum,
and the d eyiaionjst IP'rushchev Clique," starts with the un-
equivocal statement :
"The ;civile ed stratum (PS) in contemporary Soviet
soe Ptyis cozapose o ? eenera e elements from, among; ae
enterprises, and farms, as well as ubourgeoisG&intellectuals;
it stands in opposition to the workers, the peasants, and
the OWSrvhelz,ing.majority of the intellectuals and cadres
of the soviet, Union,"
Stalin "waged a staunch struggle against the forces of
capitalism,,, the Trots?:yites, Zlnovievites, and Buhharinites,"
although "it cannot be denied that before Stalin's death high
salaries were already being paid to certain groups and that
some cadres bpe alreacy degenerated and become bourgeois ele-
Monts. " However, "since ithrushchev usurped the leadership...,
there has been a fundamental change .... IN, has carried out a
series of revisionist policies serving the interests of the
bourgeoisie and rapidly swelling the forces of capitalisym in
the Soviet Un1.on.
"On the pretext of 'combatting the personality cult,'
I. has defaeo the B. ofuP. any, the socialist
system and this in fact paved the riay for the restoration
of capitalism,in the-Soviet Union. In completely negating
Stalin, he has in fact negated M-L, which `-bas upheld by
Stalin, , , 0X has, substituted 'material incentive' for the
socia1...st, p? inciple '...to each according to his wor!:.' He
has wi.cened', not narrower, the gap between the incomes of
a sma .. minority and those of the caori ers, peasants, and
ordin y Intellect~sals. He has supported the degenerates
in leaOn; posit ions,, encouraging then to become even more
unscrupulous in abusing their poi*wers and to appropriate
the f'ru,ts of labor of the Soviet people. Thus he has a--
celerated
the oolariza ion of classes in Soviet society."
VIN.,pot only have the new bourgeois elements increased
in nun eras never before, but their social status has
fundament4ily changed.
't 'i Before ', , , ,their activities were
restricted In many ways and they were subject to attar -
_I-But sire?xx, took over, ...the new bourgeois elements have
gradually ri ep to the ruling position in the o and:
ApproveMc ta~2 /Ou KAi' a IAA- Fb~.8 k61 Q QPKOP Soviet
e ,T.. , .the main social aaSi.s of the rev sionist
clique.
 Approved For Release 200a'104/14:, IA-RDP78-03061A000200080$05-8
(Addendum Cont.) '
"T46 revisionist fit. clique has carried out ' one purge
after a of e~ ..'.th ou hoot the coua try...,I early 70%
the member s of the CPSU/CC elected at its 10th Congress is
152 were pur;;e in the course of the 20th and 22nd c asses
,,,in 1056 and `l0C1. And nearly O% of the members of the
CC elected at the 23th Congress were purged at the time of
the 2n s Congress...."
"T trough this series of changes the Soviet _13S has
gained control'of the party, the government, and other i -
portant,or'ganizations...(They) appropriate the fruits of
the Soviet' people's labor and pocket incomes dozens or even
a hundred 'times those'of the average Soviet worker and pea-
sant. They not only secure high incoaes in the fora of
high salaries, 'high ar;ards, high royalties, and a great
variety of personal subsidies, but also use their privileged
position to anproT)ri:ate public property by graft and bribery.
Completely divorced from the working people of the Soviet
Union, they live the parasitical and decadent life of the
bourgeoisie."
",.,they are turning the Soviet state under the D. of
P. intoa`state under the dictatorship of'the revisionist
K. cliq e and, step by step, they are turning soda i
ownership by the' whole people and socialist collective
ownership into ownership of the PS."
Saying that "people have seen" how in Yugoslavia the Tito
clique took, the road of revisionism, transferring it into a
"dictatorship of the bureaucratic bourgeousie" with "state
capitalism " the at'ti'c le adds that"K. looks to Belgrade as his
Plecca." P!iis section concludes:
.",,.The uoviet S represented by the revisionist K.
clique constitutes only a few percent of the Soviet popula-
tion...,The' cant radiction between the Soviet people and
this is novi the p7rincipal contradiction inside the Soviet
Union, and it is an irreconc a e anc7, antagonistic c ass
con raeietioas. ? ..
'-Thie broad masses of the Soviet workers, 'collective
faraez;s, a,: nt'elleetuals are seething with discontent
against the o6p3ressabn and explo a ion arac ce by
e
.The, broad masses of the Soviet people, Communists, and
cadres are :sin, various means to resist and oppose the
line of the !1. clique .... The great Soviet people
are LIZ, .0
to::defend the glorious traditions of the Great
^
Octo dr yevouions to preserve the great gains of socialism,
and to s,.-farm the plot for the restoration of capitalism."
The third section, headed "refutation of the o-caned State
of the ;7ho1e people,'Ibegfns with citations from Phi C L asserting
that the necessary for "the entire historical pa:.-ice,
which separates cafl talis:n fromn...Communism." The varl. clique
Approve aFor tele at ?4?fUnA4-A - 61 b 5.~$istoxt
ase ,
E f
(Adedendu:a Cont.)
 Approved For Release 2000/04/141: CIA-RDP78-03061 A0002000q'0005-8
(Addendum Cont.)
it by quoting it out of context," and the article refers to a
Soviet quote f o i the marx critique of the Gotha 1 program. "As
it happens, Lenin seems to have foreseen that the revisionists
would make use o:41 O is phrase to distort Marxism... (and) gives
an excellent explanation of it." (Explanation follows.)
The section turns to Ms's talk of "de oc ca y , fo l the whole
people" and first cites Lenin on the dialectics of the develop-
ment of democr c...: "Proud absolutism honour; Bois democracy;
roan bourgeois to proletarian democracy; from proletarian demo-
cracy to none."
"Under the rule ',of the K. clique, there is no democracy
for the Soviet,worlcji people; there is democracy only for
the handful ofp0ople belonging to the revisionist K. clique,
for the PS and for the bourgeois elements, old and new....
"t,n the SIJ today, anyone who persists in the proletarian
stand, upholds M-L, and has the courage to speak out, to
resist or to fight, is watched, followed, summoned, and even
arrestec', imprisoned, or ia nose as menta'T y ili" and
seta to "men ospiatals, recently e Soviet press has
deelarod that .t is necessary to 'fight' against those who
show even the slightest dissatisfaction, and called for
'relentless battle' against the 'rotten hookers' (footnote)
who are so bold as toy, wake sarcastic remarks about IC's agri-
cultural policy. It is particularly astonishing that the
rev. K, c~ique should have on more than one occasion bloodi-
ly Su pressed strikinng workers and the masses who put` up
resin anc
The brief fourth section moves on to "Pefutation of the So-
called Party of the entire,. People." "On this question, too, K.
is a worthy disciple of Trotskiy."
The fifth, " Khr ushchev's phony Communism," repeats previous
charges and carries them forward to new extremes:
is truly an incorrigible wastrel. He has squandered
the grain reserves built up under Stalin and brough great
cult ,es into the: lives of the Soviet : people .... (Le) is
serving as a m scion Y
a the decadent American culture
...,Because of Ulm, ~nanua.C`
labor s again considered sordid
"thus it oan,, be seen that it's 'communism' is indeed
'goulash Co:r.iunism' -- the 'Communism of the American way of
life' and 'Gortw4unism eeking credits from the devil.' ..."
After citing Secretary Eusk, prim Minister Douglas-Home,
and former Secretary Dulles on the preferability of "goulash Com-
munism," the section concludes:
Approve For ? O% l~ happy
DOTn,e ,.. e zetYvisfouXst ruw_ONcl que suffer from the
_
4
 Approved For Release 20Q0/04/141: CIA-RDP78-03061A000200040005-8
(Addendum Coat.)
same kind of disease as the imperialist ruling clique:
they are extremely as ,a onist=ac to the masses of the people
*ho combrise over :3% of the world's population, and there-
fore they, too, are deal: and powerless and are paper tigers."
The final se t ..on, "111storical Lessons of then of p," is
largely a 15-,point review of "the main contents of the theories
and policies advancewi by Corarade Lao Tse-tung in this connection."
This is followed by referefices to a previously unreported 0 May
1D33 Mao "note" turnaing unexpectedly and defensively to in .ernal
Chinese problems.
"In the l.ght of the historical lessons of the L. of
P., Comcirade Mao Tse-tara has stated: class struggle, the
struggle for production, and scientific experiment are the
three great revolutionary movements for building a mighty
socialist country..
in the absence of these movements, the landlords,
rich peasants, countor-revolutionaries, bad elements, and,
ogres of all kinds were allowed to crawl out, while our
cadres E-re e to: shut their eyes to all this and in many cases
fail a to d f r^ t to between the enemy arcs ourselves,
u were to co agora o with the enemy and become corrupted'
and de aorali our cadres were thus dra ged into the
enemy cane or the enomiy were able to sneak into our ranks,
and if may of our rworkers, peasants, and the intellectuals
were d, fe s l s anst both the soft and the hard
tactic o c ae, apemy,. then it would not eke on , per perhaps
Only veral years or a decade, or several cec es at most,
,
o t1ona restoration on a national
before a ..nt
scalelneVIV9317 occurred , e M-L party would undoubtedly
become -P Tevis ox s spar y or a fascist party, and the whole
of Chl a would change its color....
"111 short, it is an extremely important question, a
mat der O~ 1i f e aid ~.~ or our party and our ' country . It
is a ques Mon of daziental importance to the proletarian
revolutionary 'cause for a hundred, a thousand,'nay ten thou-
sand years...:}'
But the a{ticke conc]udes on a defiant note of confidence:
"Regarding the emergence of the rev,. clique in the
SU, our attitu ;e as 1-Ls is the same as our attitude toward
any 'disturbance' -- first, we are against it; aecend, we
are not afraid o it, We 'did not wish it and are oppose:,
to it, but...tl:.ere is nothing terrifying about it, and there
is no 40'o6 for; afar