DRUG ABUSE--JUST WHAT THE DOCTOR ORDERED

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP78-00052R000100100013-3
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 13, 2001
Sequence Number: 
13
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 1, 1971
Content Type: 
MAGAZINE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP78-00052R000100100013-3.pdf494.45 KB
Body: 
Ms A 0 -? ~Vl M A[ J t t rN D o for O,Vdared by J. Maurice Rogers, who has spent century working in mental health. Rogers, whose Ph.D. Is in psy- chology (Stanford, 1959), is director of program de- velopment and research . r".. ' I of the San Francisco L ..w.i d % L...-....i Community Mental. Health Services. As president of the California State t'sychological Association he set up the first special committee on social issues. t to 16 ,1 meinbui of the American Psychological Association's Presidential Commission on Public Policy. Rogers bases his concern about the misuse of psychoactive drugs on the work of his colleague, Henry L. Lennard, whom he describes as "the individual who has done more research than anyone on legal drug abuse." Lennard's book, Mystification and Drug Misuse (Jossey-Bass, 1971) Is a definitive statement of the problem. CIA-RDP78-00052R000100100013-3 bi The continuing and justified alarm over illegal drug use by the young has obscured an underlying problem that is larger and even more threat- ening to society. It is an epidemic of le- gal drug abuse that is just what the doctor ordered. Depression, social inadequacy, anx- iety, apathy, marital discord, children's misbehavior, and other psychological and social problems of living are now being redefined as medical problems, to be solved by physicians with pre- scription pads. Psychiatrists as well as physicians of every other specialty now prescribe a wide variety of mood-alter- ing drugs for patients with emotional. motivational and learning problems, and even the mildest psychological dis- comforts. Model. Physicians who overuse psy- choactive drugs are wedded to an ob- solete medical model of human behavior-the concept that psy- chological problems have medical causes. This viewpoint widens the phy- sician's jurisdiction by classifying more and more persons as potential medical patients, and it allows an earnest medi- cal healer to respond to all who seek his help. The image of the physician as expert and benign begins to evaporate when we see physicians pushing psy- choactive pills whose consequences are not fully understood into patients whose problems require human, not chemical, solutions. Ads. Doctors are strongly encour- aged in their pill-for-every-problem syndrome by drug manufacturers who bombard them with advertisements in psychiatric and medical journals: Another woman? Three kids? No kids at all? Wrinkles? You name it ... If she is depressed, consider Pertofans. And: "SCHOOL, THE DARK, SEPARATION, DENTAL VISITS, MONSTERS. THE EVERYDAY ANXIETY OF CHILDREN SOMETIMES GETS OUT OF HAND. A child can usually deal with his anxieties. But sometimes the anxieties overpower the child. Then Approved For Release 2001/08/30 : CIA-RDP78-00052R000100100013-3 16 %YCHouxiY TODAY, Septsmber 1971 he needs your help. in-ay 1,i - drugs thxci there w?r? 0ers6ns in tWe 6 'U_f6r 'thiri,-vigorous, interesting or chide Vistarll. " And this advertisement, which shows an attractive but worried-looking young woman with an armful of books, and describes the problems that face a new college student: "Exposure to now friends and other influences may force her to re-evaluate herself and her goals ... Her newly stimulated intellectual curiosity may make her more sensitive to and appre- hensive about national and world con- ditiori8. " The headline reads: "TO HELP FREE HER OF EXCESSIVE ANXIETY . . . LIBRIUM." Such advertisements redefine nor.- mat problems of living as medical prob- lems to be solved by drugs. Most small children, of course, are at some time afraid of the dark or anxious about school. A person may become de- pressed after personal loss, upon fac- Ing a new job, having to adjust to new conditions, or upon experiencing llil- potence in the face of Increasing social turmoil. But the advocacy of drugs for such problems is socially irresponsible. Pitch. Drug companies depend or this country's 180,000 physicians to sell their prescription drugs. The doc- tors must be reminded, cajoled, pam- pered. The drug Industry spends over three-quarter;, of a billion dollars each year on advertising directed solely to physicians-over $4,200 per physician per year. The drug companies hold that their advertising is beneficial because it helps doctors learn about new drugs and new uses for old drugs. But many of the drug advertisements are grossly irresponsible, especially those that push psychoactive drugs-sedatives, sleeping pills, tranquilizers, energizers and mood-elevators. They are Irre- sponsible because they make broad, unsupportable claims of benefit and applicability. They are irresponsible be- cause they expand drug usage into areas that call for human coping, not escape via drugs. They are Irrespon- sible because they cajole the physician toward the notion of better psy- chological living through chemistry. Last year there were more pre- scriptions written for psychoactive country-and this does not include pre- scriptions in hospitals and clinics. Role. It is clearly in the financial inter- est of the drug industry to maintain large numbers of persons on drugs just as it is in the interest of the medical pro- fession to define more and more hu- man problems as medical. it is especially important for the drug in- dustry to recruit new groups to drug use aivd to find new uses for its prod- ucts. Flattered and seduced with bountiful free samples from the phar- macological Industry, the physician In- creasirlgly assumes, with legal sanction, a role analogous to that of the pusher. Many young people turn to dan- gerous illegal drugs to relieve unpleas- ant psyGhologicai states and to escape 'The image of the physician as expert and benign begins to evaporate when we see physicians pushing psychoactive pills whose consequences are not lolly understood Into patients whose problems require human, not chemical, solutions." from personal conflicts and problems. When the young seek these goals with drugs bought from a at'reet pusher we are greatly distressed. It Is ironic that the same purposes are accepted as valid and desirable when such drugs are prescribed by physicians. Stay. Because psychoactive drugs tend to produce a psychological de- pendence, people often continue to use a drug after it has served Its imme- diate purpose because they are uneasy about giving it up and relying on their own resources. A club leader may take prescribed tranquilizers because the thought of giving a speech without them makes her anxious. A truck driver who has combated fatigue with pre- scribed amphetamines may come to expect himself to be tired when he drives without them. Women use psychoactive drugs twice as often as men do. Many seek prescriptions for these drugs because they are lonely, anxious, dissatisfied or unhappy; because they are not as pop- beautiful as they have been led to be- lieve they should be. Among the most widely prescribed psychoactive drugs are the tranquil- izers. These chemicals originally were developed for chronically disturbed psychotic patients. But every year they are used more and more in the normal lite-sphere for personal and social problems that physicians and the drug industry have converted into medical problems. When someone dies, for ex- ample, it is not uncommon for a physi- cian to prescribe tranquilizers for the next of kin. The drugged family is then denied the opportunity to resolve a vital human experience. Quiet. Nursing homes often use tran- quilizers excessively to quiet elderly patients. Nelson H. Cruikshank, presi- dent of the National Council of Senior Citizens, has asked Congress to in- vestigate this forced pacification pro- gram. Many doctors, says Cruikshank, "give blanket instructions to nursing- home staffs for use of tranquilizer drugs on patients who do not need them. Exclusive use of tranquilizers can quickly reduce an ambulatory patient to a zombie, confining the patient to a chair or bed, causing the patient's muscles to atrophy from in- action, and causing generai health to deteriorate quickly." One ad that appeared in medical journals shows a smiling, elderly woman sitting in a wheelchair, playing cards with other old persons, "SHE IS GOING STEADY WITH HER PHENOTHIAZINE TRANQUILIZER," says the headline. The ad obviously implies that phenothia- zine will prorrrote sociability. But re- search, ignored by this ad, shows that one of the undesirable side effects of these drugs is that they reduce one's desire and ability to interact with other people. Calm. It is obviously very profitable to a drug company to hold exclusive rights to the only drug on the market for a certain disorder. Sales of the drug will increase if there is an epidemic of that disorder, or if the disorder comes to be defined so vaguely that more and more human problems can be seen as symp- toms of it. There are drugs for "simple Approved For Release 2001/08/30 CIA-RDP78-00052R0001.00100013-3 nervous tension,.' "worry "anxiety,", an outside agent. And you can't arbi- ",lack of energy"--maladies that a!e de. I trarily assume that as an adolescent he fined so broadly that everyone can rec- will give up this paltorn." Such a drug ognize some of the symptoms in i program, Dernburg believes, "would 4italin and other drugs that normally function as stimulants (Dexedrine, -rof- ranil) have been found to have a para- doxical effect on certain children who aauffer from the childhood disorder called minimal brain dysfunction. Such children are described as overactive, 6ostructive, hostile and unmanage- able. With daily doses of stimumnt drugs they allegedly cairn down, be- come more sociable, ano increase their attention span. Unfortunately, tree Symptoms of minimal bs ein dysfunction are so vague they border or the normal hyperactivity of children. An alarming n+.criber of children nave been given these drugs without the neurological and psychological examinations that are r ecosaary for a diagnosis of min- imal brain dysfunction. Exuberant chil- siren may have Ritalin prescribed primarily because parents want to quiet them down, or because teachers report that they are fidgety and inattentive in the classroom, In Omaha, Nebraska school officials recently discovered { that between five and 10 per cent of the grade-school children in that city were being given medically prescribed I amphetamines to rnooity their class- room hyperactivity or inattention. Caution. The Food and Drug Admin- istration has warned that these drugs are physiologically addictive and must be used with extreme caution. Despite this, their use under medical auspices expands alarmingly. About 250,000 children now take Ritalin daily: CiBA Pharmaceutical Company reportedly sold 10 million dollars' worth last year. Dr. Leon Wanerman of the Mount Zion Hospital and Medical Center in San Francisco asserts that "the deci- sion to place a child on medication Is too often made without careful study But if you put a child of seven on drugs for a protracted period of time, what are you telling a child about drugs and how they make you feel better?" Dr. Ernest Dernburg, also of Mount Zion, feels that such practices imply to the child "that he doesn't have the ca- i pability to get people to like him without uttimateiy prevent the child from devel- oping his own abilities to deal with his feelings." iedlets. Physicians after decades of considering the heroin addict untreat- able are now advocating treatment of this addiction by another drug, meth- ado::?ne, which is equally addictive. The advantages claimed foi methadone are that it does not disrupt normal function- mg as much as horoin, that it can be c:ycrlbed legally, and that it will re- duce carne But this treatment is a qur stioriable exchange for the dis- order--vvii:hdr,vtal from methadone is as severe as withdrawal from heroin and them is a questionable assumption "Exuberant children may have Rita 1/n prescribed primarily because parents went to quiet thein down, or because feathers report that they" are fidgety and inattentive in the, classroom. " that the antisocial behavior pattern of a heroin user will vanish once he is ad- dicted to a legal narcotic. The advocacy of methadone therapy for heroin addiction gives us a vivid dejia vu experience: heroin Itself was originally introduced by physicians as a cure for opium addiction. Similarly, co- caine was introduced to the European medical community as a cure for opium addiction (arid for other things, in- ciuding depression, digestive dis- orders, typhoid fever and alcoholism) in an essay by the then-young Vien- nese physician, Sigmund Freud. Opium itself was once recommended in a medical jouoiai as a sound treat- ment for alcoholism. In a Cincinnati Lancet Clinic article in 1889, Dr. J. R. black prese?ted his thesis in terms re- nmarkabiy sire lat to those now used to promote methadone: ' O ium is iess inimical to a healthy, life than alcohol. It calms in pace of ex- citing the baser passions, and hence is loss rroductive of acts of violence and c Continued on page 24) Approved For Release 2001/08/30 : CIA-RDP78-00052R000100100013-3 1