LETTER TO JOHN SPARKMAN FROM ROBERT J. MCCLOSKEY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP77M00144R001100210023-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
8
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 18, 2006
Sequence Number: 
23
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
LETTER
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP77M00144R001100210023-5.pdf530.08 KB
Body: 
oved For Release 2006/02/07 CIA-RDP77M00144R001100210023-5 DEPARTMENT OF STATE Washington, D.C. 20520 w-. ' r` :1F 4J,ay Honorable John Sparkman Chairman Committee on Foreign Relations United States Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Mr. Chairman: The Secretary has asked me to reply to your letter of February 10 concerning S. Res 351 "To request that the President engage in negotiations with other nations to halt international terrorist activities." As you are aware, the Executive Branch has been deeply concerned by the threat of international terrorism. A major element in our efforts to combat this threat has been the encouragement of international cooperation in bringing terrorists to justice and in denying them safe haven. We have urged that all states become party to and implement the various international conventions on hijacking and the Convention on Prevention and Punishment of Crimes Against Internationally Protected Persons. In 1972, the United States submitted to the UN a working paper containing a draft convention for the prevention and punishment of certain acts of inter- national terrorism. This draft convention would, among other things, obligate those states adhering to it to extradite or to prosecute terrorists who come within their jurisdiction. (A copy of the draft con-- vention is enclosed.) The United States has repeatedly urged that this or a similar convention be adopted by the UN, but. so far, unfortunately, without success. S. Res 351 is closely in line with these efforts to achieve greater international cooperation in the fight against terrorism. We would note, however, that we believe multilateral conventions generally hold out Approved For Release 2006/02/07 : CIA-RDP77M00144R001100210023-5 Approved For Release 2006/02/07 : CIA-RDP77M00144RO01100210023-5 greater prospects for success in combatting terrorism than individual bilateral agreements. Such conventions emphasize the responsibility of the entire international community in dealing with terrorism. Moreover, they stand a better chance of being acceptable to many states whose cooperation in fighting terrorism is es- sential but which would be unlikely to enter into a bilateral agreement on the subject with the United States. With regard to sanctions, we would favor their being applied to nations giving assistance or asylum to terrorists. As a practical matter, however, we have found ?that it is extremely difficult to secure the agreement of other nations on the application of such sanctions. The Office of Management and Budget advises that from the standpoint of the Administration's program there is no objection to the submission of this report. Sincerely, Robert J. McCloskey Assistant Secretary for Congressional Relations 1. Correspondence re Lurned 2. Draft convention Approved For Release 2006/02/07 : CIA-RDP77M00144RO01100210023-5 Approved For Release 2006/02/07 : CIA-RDP77M00144R001100210023-5 5< Working paper submitted by the United Stags of Amer, :r, DRAFT CONVENTION FOR THE, PREVE.ITION AND PUNISHMENT OF CERTAIN ACTS OF Iirt'TERNA`.l'IO1NTA TERRORISM Recalling General Assembly resolution 2625 (XXV) of 2I October 19 O, proclaiming principles of international law concerning friendly relations and co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United. Nations, Considering that this resolution provides that every State has the duty to refrain from ofganizing, instigating, assisting or participating in terrorist ants in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, Considering the common danger posed by the spread of terrorist acts across national boundaries, The State` Parties to this Convention, Considering that civilians must be protected from terrorist acts, Affirming that effective measures to control international terrorism are urgently needed and require international as well as national action, Haye reed as follows: Article 1 1. Any person who uxilaw.fully kills, causes serious bodily harm or kidnaps another person, attempts to commit any such act, or participates as an. accom ]J ce of a person who commits or attempts to comanit" any such act, corr_mits an, offence of international significance if the act (a) Is committed or takes effect outside the territory of a State o which the alleged offender is a national; (b) Is committed or takes effect (i) Outside the territory of the State against which the act is directed, or Within the territory of the State against which act is directed and the alleged off ender knows or has reason. to know a person against whom the act is directed is not a national of that State; (c) Is committed neither by nor against a member of the ax,ned forces of a State in the course of military hostilities; (d) Is intended to damage the interests of or obtain concessions from a State or an international organization.. 2. For the purposes of this Convenl'tion: (a) An "international organi:?..ttion" rnean 3 -