SEASON'S GREETINGS! (THINGS COULD BE A LOT WORSE)

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP77-00432R000100380001-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
33
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 20, 2001
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 20, 1975
Content Type: 
MAGAZINE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP77-00432R000100380001-5.pdf5.43 MB
Body: 
'--- ---Approved For Release 2001/08/08: CIA-RDP77-00432R000100380001-5? CONFIDENTIAL j -ASUDLA INTERNAL USE ONLY This publication contains clippings from the domestic and foreign press for YOUR BACKGROUND INFORMATION. Further use of selected items would rarely be advisable. 19 DECE BBER 1975 NO. 26 GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS AFRICA Destroy after backgrounder has served its purpose or within 60 days,. Approved For Release 2001/08/08 : CIA-RDP77-00432R000100380001-5 Approved For Release 2001/08/08: CIA-RDP77-00432R00010038'0001-5' TV GUIDE 20 Dec. 1975 Season's Greetings! (Things Could Be A Lot Worse) By John P. Roche This is obviously the week to ask the networks for a, Christmas present. Not, of coume, anything which might be construed as a.payoff, but rather a psy- chological favor. Please, please, dear friends, get off the paranoidal bandwa- gon. It was kind of interesting for a while, but right now the American peo- ple have signed off. It may well be con- ceivable that Vice President Calvin Coolidge shipped President Warren Harding some poisoned crab meat- and Coolidge's alibi was so solid that it might bother Dan Rather-but frankly we don't care. -Sitting as I do hundreds of miles away from those great opinion centers,.New York ~nd Washington, I find my views of the: public need are often very dif- ferent from the accepted wisdom. My Tory brethren Kevin Phillips and Pat Buchanan, for example, seem to think .that Western Civilization is going down' the greased chute, while various liberal .dervishes indicate that, as payment for our sins, we should be volunteering for execution. Maybe I lack the appropriate perspective or conscience, but I would much rather be alive in 1975 than in 1675 and I don't feel a fearful burden of guilt about the misdeeds of the Cen- tral Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation or Chairman Kissinger. - After all, life in 1975 isn't all that bad. Sure, the death rate from cancer and heart attacks is up, but (auto accidents aside) it is hard to die of anything else. To be specific, in 1675 the odds are I would be already among the angels (or-well, let's drop that). The life ex- pectancy of the American white male in 1900 was 45, so you can only guess what it was three centuries ago. More- over, if I were alive in 1675, 1 would probably be digging peat out of some bog and living in a thatched hut with no television to criticize. The problem with my friends who think Western Civilization faces extinc- tion is that they implicitly assume that in 1675 they would have been dukes, not sod cutters, serfs or slaves. I admit a certain anger when I note that my electricity bill has doubled over the past couple of years, but then I recall that had there been electricity a couple of centuries ago, my ancestors could not have afforded it. What I am saying runs up against some polling data that indi- cates Americans are unhappy about the general State of Things, but take a look at the questions. If asked, "Do you think things could be better in the United States?", what red-blooded citizen could conceivably say, "No!"? So much for Western Civilization. Now what about all these calls for col- lective penance and flagellation? What" about all these efforts to reopen the "Strange Death of President Harding" (a book I remember seeing as a kid),- the puff of smoke on a grassy knoll in Dallas, and (at the rate things are going) every other political murder in American history? Efforts to reassess the guilt of: Jack the Ripper, Aaron Burr, John Wilkes Booth, Alger Hiss, the Rosen- bergs and-at the United Nations of all places-ldi Amin's hero Adolf Hitler, seem to be a great growth industry, but the American people are yawning by the million. (American folk wisdom puts a low premium on conspiracy theories, in general accepting Roche's Law: "Those who can conspire haven't got time; those who do conspire haven't got tal- ent.")' Let us take Eunice Kennedy Shriver's sound advice that this search for second guns and third bullets is such a waste of the minds of brilliant men and women. it doesn't lift us up.. or solve anything Well, now that we have disposed. of Western Civilization and the grave rob- bers, what about the tremendous cam- paign against the CIA and the FBI? For starters, let me note that it you pump out a septic tank only once every quarter of a century, you are likely to find some strange detritus. With that in mind, the first question should be, "Why didn't Congress fulfill its obligation to the American people by keeping these outfits on a tight leash?" (The answer is that Congress didn't want to, an atti- tude that reflected the views of the public at large. To say this is not to justify the position: when I was national chairman of Americans for Democratic Action I flayed FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover in season and out. Unfortu- nately I played to an empty house.) " Today it's open season on the CIA and FBI and there is a real risk'that these agencies will be effectively destroyed. This would be a disastrous eventuality, particularly since most of the work of the CIA and the FBI has not been re- ,motely lawless. But as President Lyn- don Johnson once observed about his former colleagues on the Hill, "Once that pack tastes blood, they go wild." Moreover, if my reading of the public need (which is knot obtained by lunching daily with those who agree with me) is accurate, the American people want ef- fective intelligence agencies. The big complaint I have heard about the CIA, for example, is not that it tried to knock off Fidel Castro (whom few confuse with St. Francis of Assisi), but that it couldn't do the job right! - To put it differently, the people of this country are not innocents. While they don't articulate their views on "The Necessary Amorality of Foreign Affairs" in the convincing' fashion of Arthur Schlesinger Jr., like him they assume that "saints can be pure, but statesmen, alas, must be responsible." (Harper's, August 1971.) Thus when Sen. .Frank Church comes on like the Avenging Angel, suggesting we are all neck-deep in Sin, the average response is, "What world does he live in? It's- not a bad. question. Naturally nobody is going to get up in this atmosphere of piety and advo- cate political assassinations, but there are 12 or 13 million of us who in our sinful hearts wish that in 1937 some intelligence agent had put a slug into. Adolf Hitler. And, those who have read Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's ' "Gulag Archipelago" must have a similar atti- tude toward Joseph Stalin. Interestingly enough, there is an elaborate literature on the appropriate Christian grounds for tyrannicide.: From - my reading of it, I suspect the Angelic Doctor, St. Thomas Aquinas, might condone an attempt on Castro as a tyrant "ex parte. exorciti," for having, promised the Cuban people freedom and creating a dictatorship.. Before someone starts " a 'move "to expel me from Sunday school, let me make it, clear that I have grave moral reservations about many of the actions of the CIA and the FBI, and I trust that Congress will establish strong controls over their activities. But let's stop beat- ing our breasts and moaning over our collective guilt-things aren't all that bad. Season's Greetings! E Approved For Release 2001/08/08: CIA-RDP77-00432R000100380001-5 Approved For Release 2001/08/08 : CIA-RDP77-00432R000100380001-5 NEW YORK TIMES 19 Dec. 1975 Panel -Backs Bush For C.I.A. as Ford Bars Political Bid By'NICHOLAS M. HORROCK Special to The New York Times WASHINGTON, Dec. 18-The Senate Armed Services Com rcittee voted today to approve the nomination of George Bush as Director of Central Intel- ligence, after President Ford ruled out the 51-year-old for- rr er member of Congress as a possible running mate in 1376. ' The committee's 12-to-4 ap-' proval of Mr. Bush presumably assures his confirmation by the full Senate early next year, but several senior Congression- aF sources said that the political i "cyst" to President Ford was' "excessive." In ruling out Mr. Bush from consideration as a running mate, Mr. Ford reversed a posi- tion' taken last November dur- an appearance on the tele- a~,;eor panel show `:Meet the 'ss." At that time the Pres- h i? n. said he would not rule !'cat Mr. Bush because "I don't g eople with talents, indi :uais with capabilities and :ecord. ought to be excluded rf:,am any further public ser- . n,,Te 99 1~ilr. Bush said today that he had not contemplated his fu- 'ire beyond service in the ?C.LA. Since it was President 7a id - ruling out Mr. Bush as a gunning mate in 1976, rather t rA Mr. Bush making a pledge nc. to run, Mr. Bush presuma- ij' would be free to accept a Vic Presidential nomination( frcm. any other Republican or D. mdsrat. But there is no! sc:?:ous suggestion that one will -~ ; ffered. illr. Ford's action today, r awever, was credited with getting the nomination four ;etas in the Armed Services. CC mmittee and thus permitting to be reported to the Senate floor with the committee's rec- cmmendations. Senator Frank Church, De- mocrat of Idaho, who is chair- .,an of the Senate Select Com- ttee on Intelligence and a leading opponent of Mr. Bush's nomination, said that though he would vote against 'confir- mation, he would not lead a ,floor fight to halt the appoint- ment. Mr. Bush said in an interview that he hoped the President's action would remove "legiti- mate doubts of his willingness to concentrate on.' the intel- ligence post. He said he had "urged and supported" Mr. Ford's decision to take him out' of the running.."I' have no worries about my own fu- ture," he said, Mr.. Bush said he hoped that) the full Senate could, consider, the matter before the Christ-1 Imas recess, but that several; Senators had told him that itl Arrangements by Cline It was reported today that when the first hold arrange- merits on the arms matter were made in 1972, Ray Clfne, then chief of the State Department's intelligence office, told mem- bers of one intelligence group that he "must keep Rogers and Approved For Release 2001/08/08 : CIA-RDP77-00432R000100380001-5 was-clear. his-appointment and several ,appointment be held over until January. Letter to Stennis From the momept Mr. Bush was nominated in November to head the C.I.A.,. White House strategists have. known that' he faced stiff opposition from IDemocrats who believed his political background was unsui- table for the position. But when the committee's ,public hearings on the nomina- tion opened Monday, the oppo- I sition among Democrats to Mr. ;Bush seemed, one source said, "manageable," in the sense that ,the White House "had the votes to win in committee and on the floor." By late Tuesday, however, the White House had learned t'tat seven, and possibly eight, of the committee members would vote against Mr. Bush. The nominee met with Mr. Ford several times Wednesday for a total of about an hour and a half. It was the advice of White House strategists at those meetings that if Mr. Bush. wanted to become C.I.A. direc-' tor without a massive battle' and long delay in 1976, he' must be willing 'to give up hopes of becoming Mr. Ford's running mate. Senator Henry M.. Jackson, Democrat of Washington, who is a committee member, had given the President a relatively graceful opening to deal with I the situation the day before .when he suggested that al- though Mr. Bush might not want to, give up his "right" to run for the Vice-Presidency, 'Mr. Ford could simply rule him out. By 7 P.M. yesterday, the decison had been made and Mr. Ford drafted a letter to John C. Stennis, the Mississippi Democrat who is chairman of the committee. "Ambassador Bush and I agree that the nation's imme- i diate foreign intelligence needs must take precedence over oth-1 er considerations and there should be 'continuity in the C.I.A. leadership," Mr. Ford's .letter said in part. "Therefore if Ambassador Bush is con- firmed by the Senate as Direc- tor of Central Intelligence, I will not consider him' as my -Vice-Presidential running mate in 1976." The committee met shortly before 10 A.M. and debated some 45 minutes in closed ses- sion. It voted in public session and the President's letter was given to'the press. The core of objection to Mr. Bush has been that his partisan political background might create conflict of interest prob- lems -for a Director of Central Intelligence. And a possible Vice - Presidential candidacy' raised' the question that Mr. Bush might leave the C.I.A. in so short a time that his service would be, as- Senator Jackson put it, "merely tran- sient." Responsible Republican Con- gressional sources believe that the White House made a "strategy error" in sending up Mr. Bush's name without being "immediately willing to forget the Vice-Presidential matter" and that it hurts the President's credibility on Capitol Hill when he has to reverse his position completely to get his nominee through. . . If confirmed, Mr.' Bush will be a departure from the kind of men chosen to head the C.I.A. in the past. He will be the first director with a strong- ly partisan political background since the agency was formed in 1947. . In addition to having served as a member of Congress from Texas, Mr. Bush was chairman of the Republican Nationall Committee and United States! bassad'or to the United Nations' before Mr. Ford sent him to the People's Republic of China as chief of tl3e United Stat'es. Liaison Office, NEW YORK TIMES, THURSDAY, DECEMBER, 18, 1975 Cover-Up Is Laid to Kissinger erly informed President Ford. I beal and Brig Gen William) . . By Sp NICHOLAS York Times HORROCK . ( According to C.I.A. docu- Georgi, the commissioner and The New \ M. WASHINGTON, Dec. 17 - ments, an intelligence report: United States-Soviet commissioner of the group as- Some 1973 intelligence reports on Russian -missile-silo con- -signed to monitor compliance. that the Soviet Union might struction was withheld from Under questioning today by have violated the agreements certain top Government off , A. Searl Field, staff director of cials and Congressional leaders the- committee, William R. Hy. strategic-arms limitation Y? were withheld by Henry A. Kis- from June 9, 1973,. until Aug. land, chief of the State Depart. singer from certain top Admini- 8, 1973. ment's intelligence office, ac- stration officials and Congres- The committee staff mem- these knowledged that even though these officials were not told, sional leaders, according ' to bers said there were indications' the matter was raised with the documents and testimony at'a of :"numerous other withhold- Russians on two occasions. House hearing today. ings" in the files they ex- "You mean the Russians were Documents produced at the' amined. According to the testi. told about this?" Mr. Field! hearing showed that' shortly mony, since the."Bold system" asked. "Well, who were we after the arms-limitation ac- meant that the person barred keeping the secret from?" cords were signed in Moscow never -knew the information I Mr. Hyland said ere "hold system" kept pt the material from by President Richard M. Nix-, was developed, in effect he United States officials who had on, Mr. Kissinger, then. the never knew that he had not the clearance to read the intel.' Presidential Assistant for Na- !been briefed. ligence report but had "no poli- tional Security Affairs, ar- I In the 1973 instance, Edwards cy considerations in thsi area. ranged to limit the circulation Proctor, de ut director for in- no particular need to know." of intelligence reports on s p y It was unclear from today's b p po 1 telligence at C.I.A., became so! questioning just who had the sible Soviet violations. Among concerned about the witholding! power to remove the names those affected, it was dis- that he wrote Lieut. Gen. Ver-' of officials from the C.T.A. cir- closed, was William P. Rogers, ' non A. Walters, then acting culation list. Nominally, Mr. 'then the Secretary of State. director of the C.I.A., that "at Proctor agreed, the Director The documents, from the[ of Central Intelligence, at that minimum I think you should time General Walters and later rCentral Intelligence Agency, and seek Dr. Kissinger's assurance Willian E. Colby. designated the testimony were given to that he has informed or will the persons: But the memoran- tile House Select Committee on inform the President of this dums made it clear that the Intelligence. situation and the concern, it National Security Council staff The charge against Mr. Kis- generates." gave the names of persons who A 'Strong Case' could be told or who could er has also bee made on la' __ c,n lA t be to g several occasions by Adm. Elmo At another point in the same R. Zumwalt Jr., retired chief memorandum, he said he would of naval operations, -who told not "presume" to suggest whether key members of Con- a House panel early this month gress should be -briefed, but he that the Russians had commit- said there was a "strong case" ted "gross violations" of the for informing Mr. Rogers, U. 1972 accords but that the Sec- Alexis Johnson, the chief of the retary of State had not prop- United States delegation at the arms talks, and Sidney N. Gray- Approved For Release 2001/08/08 : CIA-RDP77-00432R000100380001-5 - Johnson informed about" alli substantive findings on the arms issue, He' asked for clearance to do so and was, in effect, told to handle the matter informal- ly. Mr. Cline was one of the men who testified today. Mr. Cline said his concern with the "hold-down system" was that it did not have "cer- tain checks and balance" that would rule out the possibility' of "suppression of information) unattractive to policy-makers.."I This has been the thrust of ,the investigation by the com- mittee headed by Representa- tive Otis G. Pike, Democrat of Suffolk. It has conducted; several hearings on whether Mr. Kissinger and others in government and the Intel- ligence community could with- hold vital data from the Pres= ?ident, thus affecting his deci- .. . :'s ion-.making. 1vE7d YORK TIlES 18 Dec. 1975 Cuban Party Talks .Open With Castro" Accusing the C.I.A.1 I . MIAMI, Dec. 17 (AP)-Prime Minister Fidel Castro opened, the First Cuban Communist, Party Congress before morel than 3,000 delegates and 86 foreign delegations in kavana today by listed crimes he said had been carried out against his country by the United States Central Intelligence Agency. "The Central' Intelligence Agency organized dozens of attempts agains the lives of the leaders of the Cuban revo- lution," Mr. Castro said in part of a long, historical account of his regime's 16 years. Mr. Castro read his statement in an emotionless, steady mo- notone; it was carried over nationwide radio and television and monitored in' iami. "Leading members of the Mafia were also contracted for these ends," Mr. Castr o said in his first public comment on reports of assassination plots against him. ' I Among the actions to be to-I ken during the six-day gather-i ing is the adoption of a new Marxist-Leninist constitution, endorsement of the country's first five-year economic plan and appointment of new mem- bers of the party's. Central Committee. Friday, Dec. 19, 1975 TH ' WASFOGTON POST By Genrge Lardner Jr. Washington Post Staff Writer The Senate intelligence committee is drafting legislation to create a suc- cessor committee that could pick up any unfinished in- vestigations early next spring. The proposal would create a permanent Senate oversight committee with far-reaching jurisdiction over the CIA and all other intelligence agencies and with investigative authority over spy work conducted by the FBI or any other federal law enforcement agency. Intelligence committee Chairman Frank Church (D- Idaho) said the recom- mendation will be submitted next month-before his committee's final report-and will be scheduled for im- mediate hearings before the Senate Government Operations Committee "Now is the moment for reforms,", Church said in an interview. "If we wait, the shock effect of the revelations we've made will wear away." He said he hopes for Senate action on the bill by March 1, the day after his committee is scheduled to complete its work. The legislation would also require action by the House, since the proposed new committee would have statutory authority. "The committee would then have powers beyond what a Senate resolution could confer," Church said. "For example, the legislation would - WASHa NGTON POST 14 DEC 1975 impose an affirmative duty on the CIA to keep the committee fully advised of all significant activities." Other senators on the Church committee have privately voiced concern that their investigation is being wrapped up too quickly, to meet Church's desires to run for the presidency. Staff investigations into a number of areas, ranging from the super-secret National Security Agency to problems of executive branch "command and control" over the intelligence community, have received only limited exposure at public hearings. Church insisted that enough momentum for reforms has already been generated and that no further public hearings are needed. The committee is scheduled to spend its last 2 ii't months behind closed doors. New public disclosures are to. be limited to printed reports. "There'll never be a point where we can finish this work," Church said of the abuses that might,be un-, covered. "We've already extended our charter six months past the original (Sept. 1 expiration) date. The function of the committee has been discharged when we have sufficient basis for legislation, for reforfns. If Congress follows through with an oversight committee, that committee will have the time to devote to any unfinished business." Colby S,"ores British TV dhow By Morton Mintz Washington Post Staff Writer C IA Director William E. Colby went on local public television last night to charge that a British TV program on ? the agency was "tendentious, partial and biased." Colby made the charge in an interview on WETA, which had carried the British program, produced by Granada Television, last week. Replying to a question about assassination CIA Colby told interviewer Paul Duke that it "is not justified, and I've Issued directives against it, and I've turned down Colby declined to provide suggestions from high of- details. He- said he had made ficials in the past that that be ' the statement before and had done. I have no question about read it in print, although he that. Certainly it should not be could not immediately recall done, except in time of war, of where. course... ' A CIA spokesman who Colby had proposed, a reporter asked him about the suggestions for assassinations he had turned down. The director made clear that he was referring to a period of time after he became a CIA operations officer 25 years ago, but before President Nixon named him to head the agency. The permanent oversight legislation, still being drafted, would put the new Senate committee in charge of all laws, including budget authorizations, for the CIA, the NSA, the Defense Intelligence Agency and all o1ther agencies devoted to strategic intelligence. The oversight committee would, for example, take over the confirmation hearings for CIA director, now handled in the Armed Services Committee. For the F'BI and other law enforcement agencies now largely under the judiciary Committee, the Church committee is considering asserting only the power to investigate their intelligence- gathering activities. The House could amend the bill to provide for a joint congressional oversight committee, but Church in- dicated that he thought it safest to propose only a Senate committee. . The House intelligence committee; headed by Rep. Otis G. Pike (D-N.Y.), is expected to submit its final. report and recommendations at the end of January, in- cluding perhaps a joint oversight committee. Its proposals may run into far heavier opposition It seems likely, however, that the House would let the Senate set up whatever kind of com- mittee it. wants. accompanied Colby to the interview said he had been present on occasions when Colby had made the statement to reporters, but could not say where it had been printed. The Granada Television program was produced several months ago and was shown on public television in New York in September. 3 A rweved-FIGF ease .CIA-RDR77-00432F O=0038QQAl.5. ,a-_ Approved For Release 2001/08/08 : CIA-RDP77-00432R000100380001-5 THE WASHINGTON POST Thursday, Dec. 18, 1975 SAL TyDaul But Secrets Were Shared With Russia, Probe Told By George Lardner Jr. Washington Post Staff Writer High-ranking government officials, including a- Secretary of State, have been routinely denied top-secret information even after it has been shared with the Russians, the House in- telligence committee was told yesterday. White House aide William G. Hyland told the committee that he saw nothing wrong with the practice and said it was much less ominous than House investigators seemed to think. Former State Department intelligence chief Ray S. Cline said, however, that he fought against the system un- successfully before leaving the government and said he considered it `contrary" to the 1947 law creating' reating the Central Intelligence Agency. The practice was applied to intelligence concerning the 1972 Strategic Arms Limitation agreement under strict rules laid down by Henry A. Kissinger's National Security Council staff, primarily to guard against "leaks" of such information. As a result, Hyland acknowledged, in mid-1973 reports of possible Soviet arms control violations were kept from then Secretary of State William P. Rogers and other top government officials even after the Russians themselves had been told of the information in two separate diplomatic notes. The House committee's staff director, Searle Field, protested repeatedly that the system kept "our people," including officials closely connected with SALT negotiations and monitoring. in the dark without any justification. "Who, were we keeping it (the information) secret from?" Field demanded. "The people who read the (U.S.) intelligence bulletins," responded -Hyland, a : former ? State Department aide to Kissinger and now deputy White House assistant for national security, affairs. He contended that there was "no particular need" for Rogers or others, such as the U.S. am- hassador in charge of con- tinuing - strategic arms negotiations, to have been informed of the possible Soviet violations... _ _ , _ _. , . JOURNAL, Lansing, Mich. 29 November 1975 ence Agency. Some recent revelations made by the Senate's Select Committee on Intelligence not only, have been extremely damaging to. the CIA's credibility but also could have a strong impact on the nation's foreign policy. . Kissinger, obviously concerned about the fu- ture of,detente,policies, told a Detroit audience the other day it was time for Congress to direct its at- tention away front "disruptive" investigations of Field pointed out that the information was not even included in the daily in- telligence bulletins given President Nixon at the time, but CIA Deputy Director The testimony at vester- Edward Proctor, who also day's hearing indicated that testified, said Nixon was in- Ambassador Johnson and formed through "other Sidney INC Graybeal, the arms channels." .. control- agency4s . special The secret information at assistant for SALT, were issue concerned the detection b 1 b t h of Soviet construction of several silos in Jure, 1973, while Communist Part. leader Leonid I. Brezhnev was visiting the United States. It later turned out that the silos were not for missiles. Proctor wrote a three-page memo to the acting. CIA director on July 13, 1973, expressing growing concern about the information's. being kept in a tightly restricted "hold" status for so long. He said he thought "a strong case" could be made at that point for informing, at the least, Rogers, SALT am- bassador U. Alexis Johnson, and the top officials of the standing consultative com- mission that had been set up to. deal with arms control compliance. Apprehensive that the furor over the Watergate scandal and other problems may have left Nixon unaware of the problem, Proctor also recommended that Kissinger -be pressed for assurances that . ""he has informed or will in- form the President of this situation and the concerns it generates." su Sequen y roug t up to date, but that Rogers may, inever have been. Both Hyland and Proctor said that the restrictions on arms-control information stemmed from an agreement that there be no public disclosures of suspected violations until the Russians had been queried first. The two witnesses also contended that in practice it was assumed that the un- derlings at the State Depar- tment, such as Cline, who were privy to such in- formation, would inform their superiors about it even though this.was not, on paper, per- missible. Cline denounced such. logic and said it overlooked the fact -that a system denying the, Secretary of State information he "had every right to have" had been established. Although he could have ignored it and informed Rogers, he- said. "any violation of instructions from the White House were met, :with great wrath from the Nadel al Security Council staff.'- intelligence agencies and toward an aggressive de- tente policy as well as a strong defense policy. . -President.. Ford has also been-stressing that -l the nation's foreign intelligence system, whatever the problems of the past, must not be damaged be- yond repair in the present investigations. Certainly the CIA needs some regrouping and a-chance to repair the damage resulting from re-' cent public testimony about past CIA operations, i including a series of assassination plots. The nature of some of the plots apparently-, proposed but never carried out against Cuban Pre-, mier Fidel Castro were so bizarre that one won-', ders what kind of mentality dreamed up such mea- sures and how they were given any serious . thought in such a formidable intelligence organiza- tion. The CIA has rightly been put through the meat grinder. But, as Kissinger suggests, it is time to start trying to put the pieces back together. We hope Congress will do that, and a first step would be the re-establishment of a tough, congressional committee to oversee CIA operations so that such abuses of power can never happen again. : . It is also essential that a weeding out process take place to fire any of those still around who played any major role in the clandestine assassi- nation plots. We hope the Senate committee wilt start moving in that direction soon. ' Secretary of State Henry Kissinger has good reason to be upset about ongoing investigations of the strange past activities of the Central Intellig- Approved' For Release 2001/08/08: CIA-RDP77-00432R000100380001-5 Approved For Release 2001/08/08 : CIA-RDP77-00432R000100380001-5 Io% Anccleg Mime Wed., Dec. 17,1975 BY JACK NELSON and RONALD J. OSTROW Times Staff Writers NVASHINGTON-The" Senate In- telligence Committee's report on CIA assassination plots disclosed that President John F. Kennedy had a "close friend' who, also associated with two underworld figures that were principals in one death plot. But the report concealed that the friend was a California woman. Ju- dith Campbell Exner,' who in re- sponse to recent reports of her rela- tionship with Kennedy has called a press. conference for today in San Lego. Officials of the Senate committee 'Tuesday confirmed published reports that the friend was a woman who met Kennedy-then a senator-at the 1960 Democratic convention in Los Angeles, which nominated him for the Presidency. ' She was in contact with him fre- quently thereafter, according to the Senate committee reports. It said. that records showed a total of 70 telephone calls between her and the White House over 54 weeks in 1961 and 1962. The woman. was identified by a committe source Tuesday as dirs. Ex- ncr, a dark-haired artist who, accord- ing to her attorney, has been living in San Diego for the past year. The committee discovered Mrs. Ex- ner's relationship with Kennedy while investigating a Central Intel- ligence Agency plot to assassinate Cuban Premier Fidel Castro. The plot involved two underworld figures, Sam Giancana and John Roselli, who the FBI learned were friends of M , Exner. Giancana, a Chicago Mafia leader, was murdered last June shortly be- fore he was scheduled to testify be. fore the Senate committee. Rosselli, once a protege of Giancana, testified in secret session about a week after Giancana's slaying, Both Committee Chairman Frank Church (D-Dia.) and Vice Chairman John G. Tower (R.Tex.) denied Tuesday, . that there had been "any effort to cover up any informa to pertinent to the committee's assassination enquiry. Church said that there was no evidence that the woman 1new anything about the plot against Castro and that "no' one on the committee thought that the President's person:: relationships with her, whatever they were, were the r business of the committee. "We would have been accused of being salacious and sensational and rumor-mongering if we had tried to go: into personal relationships and it would have, been highly improper," Church said. "Any attempt to characterize the tfport as a coverup is really outrageous." '"The Senate committee's two-page reference to Kenne 4y's "close friend" in its 347-page assassination report Went largely unnoticed when the report was issued Nov. 20. Attention focused on the committee's central findings that the CIA under four American Presidents had plotted the death or overthrow of five foreign leaders. Kennedy's telephone contacts with Mrs. Exner were cit- ed in a section of the report entitled, "Did President Ken- nedy learn anything about assassination plots as a result of the FBI investigation of Giancana and Rosselli?" !The report concluded that there was no way to know f' sure, but said that Kennedy could have learned about t se Castro plot from the FBI investigation. Shortly before the committee's report was released last month the Washington Post and Scripps-Howard newspa- pers reported that the committee had established a link between Kennedy and a Judith Campbell. The news- ac-o cunts also mentioned her relationship with Giancana and Rosselli and said that the committee was attempting to determine whether Kennedy could have learned from her About a CIA plot to kill Castro. The report, however, gave few clues to the identity of iennedy's "close friend," mentioning neither sex nor age. That prompted New York Times Columnist William Sa= fire to charge Monday that the committee "has attempted. a? coverup from the government's end; the Mafia, by atiencing Giancana forever, has clamped down the lid:. from its end." 'Satire, who served in the White House under former" ]resident Richard M. Nixon, said it was "the public's busi-' tress" when a President shares a close friend with a Mafia figure selected by the CIA to arrange the assassination of, Castro. Church denied Safire's charge of coverun, iMrs. Exner, who was in her mid-twenties when she first net Kennedy, testified in close session that she had no knowledge of any assassination plot against Castro. Rc- Belli also testified that the woman had no knowledge of the plot. "Rosselli could not be reached for comment Tuesday, but ? a source close to him said, "Rosselli became very annoyed at the committee for trying to defame American woman- hnod and the reputation of a past President." The source said that Rosselli refused to answer. some questions about the Kennedy-Exner relationship. The committee report noted that all living CIA:officials who were involved in.the underworld assassination at- tempt or who were in a' position to have known of the at- tempt had testified that they never discussed the assassin- ation plot with the President. By May, 1961, however, the President's brother, Atty, Gen. Robert F. Kennedy and FBI Director J. Edgar Hoov- er had reason to know that Giancana was involved in the. plot, the committee reported. Although there was no evidence to indicate that anyone ins the FBI had concluded that Giancana was involved, the report continued, the committee uncovered "a chain of events.... which would have given Hoover an opportuni- ty to have assembled the entire picture and to have re- ported the information to the President." The committee reported that it had evidence indicating "that a close friend of President Kennedy had frequent Contact with the President from the end of 1960 through mid-1962. FBI reports and testimony indicated that the President's friend was also a close friend of John Rosselli and Sam Giancana and saw them often during this same pCriod." Mention of the telephone calls between Kennedy and ,his friend was made in a footnote: "White House telephone logs show 70 instances of -phone contact between the White House and the Pres- .ident's friend whose testimony confirms frequent phone contact with the President himself." On Feb. 27, 1962, the report continued, Hoover sent identical copies of a memorandum to the attorney general and Kenneth O'Donnell, special assistant to the President,