PROTECTING AND PRESERVING TAPE RECORDINGS INVOLVING FORMER PRESIDENT M. NIXON

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP76M00527R000700170022-2
• Release Decision: RIFPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 6
• Document Creation Date: December 12, 2016
• Document Release Date: September 4, 2001
• Sequence Number: 22
• Publication Date: December 9, 1974
• Content Type: OPEN

Approved For Release 2001/11/01 : CIA-RDP76M00527R000700170022-2
11446
less, of course, a recipient of a loan de-
faults on repayment.
I urge the adoption of House Resolu-
tion 1485. in order that H.R. 5385 may
be considered:
Mr. MARTIN of Nebraska. Mr. Speak-
er, I yield myself such time as I may
consume.
(Mr. MARTIN of Nebraska asked and
was given permission to revise and ex-
tend his remarks.)
Mr. MARTIN of Nebraska. Mr. Speak-
er, the distinguished gentleman from
Hawaii (Mr. MATSUNAGA) has explained
the resolution, and as that gentleman
said, the resolution provides for an open
rule with 1 hour of debate on the bill
H.R. 5385; the Surface Transportation
Act of 1974.
This bill provides for up to $2 billion
in guaranteed loans to the-railroads to
assist them in improving and inoderniz-
ing their physical plant and the pur-
chase of new freight cars. In addition,
the bill authorizes $15 million to con-
duct two studies, one the national freight
car utilization system and, second, a
railroad electrification study.
I would like to point out, Mr. Speaker,
that rail transportation is by far the
most economical and the cheapest of
any transportation that we have In the
country today. To move 1 ton a mile by
rail, the-locomotive consumes 750 Btu's,
a truck consumes 2,400 Btu's, and a
plane consumes 63,000 Btu's. Rail trans-
' portation is extremely important to our
country. I support the rule and I support
the legislation.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of
my time.
Mr. MATSUNAGA. Mr. Speaker, I
yield 5 minutes to the distinguished
gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. THoMP-
SON).
(Mr. THOMPSON of New Jersey asked
and was given permission to revise and
extend his remarks.)
Mr. THOMPSON of New Jersey. Mr.
Speaker, I shall seek to defeat the pre-
vious question on the rule in order to
amend the rule. I hope to strike the pro-
vision in the rule that makes H.R. 7189, a
nongermane bill, in order as an amend-
ment to the Surface Transportation Act.
In form, H.R. 7189 would amend the
Railway Labor Act. In substance it
amends the National Labor Relations
Act, or Taft-Hartley.
I want to emphasize, however, that I
am In complete support of the Surface
Transportation Act without H.R. 7189
attached to it.
This position, I might say, is expressed
in a letter to the Speaker dated Decem-
ber 9 from the Secretary of Labor. This
position is also supported by Mr. Usery,
the head of the Federal Mediation and
Conciliation Service.
H.R. 7189 would prohibit strikes or
walkouts in the longshore or maritime
industries on the west coast which inter-
fere with shipping between the west
coast, Hawaii, Guam, and the other Pa-
cific islands for a period of 160 days. The
antistrike position is enforceable on peti-
tion to a U.S. district court for an injunc-
tion or temporary restraining order, and
would be In addition to the injunction
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD -HOUSE December 9, 1974
available under section 208 of Taft-Hart-
ley of 1947.
The bill permits an injunction to be ob-
tained whenever there is any Interrup-
tion whatsoever in commerce. Such in-
terruption could be determined to exist
if a single ship is delayed as much as 48
hours. The Federal district court'is not,
under this bill, expected to make a judg-
ment as to whether a genuine emergency
exists before issuing an injunction. Un-
like the National Labor Relations Act,
this proposal ,determines conclusively
that "any disruption" of maritime com-
merce on the west coast automatically
imperils the health ant well-being of the
people of Hawaii and other affected is-
lands. And I would say, parenthetically,
that I am in deep sympathy with the
problems of Hawaii, but Hawaii is not
in any way the only State with this
problem.
The city of New York, for instance,
can be completely isolated by a tugboat
strike.
H.R. 7189 amounts to a virtual prohi-
bition against maritime and longshore-
men strikes in Hawaii. That would be
the practical effect of a 160-day morato-
rium added to the 80-day Taft-Hartley
injunction.
It is generally realized that some eco-
nomic disruption accompanies any
strike, and traditionally we have ac-
cepted such disruption to encourage free
collective bargaining.
I agree with Mr. Usery that the in-
junction provided for in this bill will not
encourage labor or management to seek
peaceful means of resolving their dif-
ferences through collective bargaining.
One may question the wisdom of legisla-
tion on behalf of the State of Hawaii in
this unique and isolated way. One must
seriously question whether Hawaii suf-
fers more seriously than the 37,000 com-
munities in the Nation which are served
exclusively by truck transportation
when there is a truck strike-or the city
of New York, when the tugboats, their
captains and crews go on strike. New
York is also an island.
Mr. PERKINS. Mr. Speaker, will the
gentleman yield?
Mr. THOMPSON of New Jersey. I
yield to the gentleman from Kentucky.
Mr. PERKINS. I thank the gentleman
for yielding.
Mr. Speaker, if I understand the gen-
tleman's amendment and what he is
seeking to do here, we must first vote
down the previous question before the
gentleman from New Jersey will be per-
mitted to offer his amendment. No one
is fighting the Surface Transportation
Act at all.
Mr. THOMPSON of New Jersey. That
is right.
Mr. PERKINS. We just want the Sur-
face Transportation Act to proceed on
its merits without this amendment at-
tached. The Matsunaga amendment does
not belong to it-it belongs in the gen-
tleman's subcommittee-and should be
deleted.
Mr. THOMPSON of New Jersey. The
chairman is exactly correct. The amend-
ment Is on page 2 of the rule to strike
out the sentence beginning on line 10 and
ending with the word "substitute" on
line 13. That simply takes the Matsunaga
bill out of the Surface Transportation
Act, which I shall enthusiastically sup-
port.
The SPEAKER. The time of the gen-
tleman has expired.
Mr. MATSUNAGA. Mr. Speaker, I
yield 5 minutes to the gentleman from
California (Mr. PHILLIP BURTON).
(Mr. PHILLIP BURTON asked and
was given permission to revise and ex-
tend his remarks.)
Mr. PHILLIP BURTON. Mr. Speaker,
I, too, join with my colleague, the gen-
tleman from New Jersey, in opposing the
vote on the previous question. I intend
to vote for the legislation out of the
committee. But I think it is a very ill-
advised procedure that the Committee on
Rules, without a hearing on the merits,
affix this kind of amendment to legisla-
tion being reported out of another com-
mittee.
This House has a way of referring
back to actions of previous Congresses.
On occasion they are called precedents.
I would urge those who prefer that
this kind of action by, the Committee on
Rules be discouraged rather than en-
couraged bear in mind that "what is
good for the goose in the 93d Congress
may be good for the gander in the 94th
Congress." So I urge a vote against the
previous question and then a vote to
change the rule.
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance
of my time.
Mr. MATSUNAGA. Mr. Speaker, I
yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from
Washington (Mr. ADAMS).
(Mr. ADAMS asked and was given
permission to revise and extend his re-
marks,)
Mr. ADAMS. I thank the gentleman
for yielding.
Mr. Speaker, I want to support the
position of the gentleman from New Jer-
sey (Mr. THOMPSON) and the gentleman
from California (Mr. PHILLIP BURTON)
that the previous question be voted down,
and that the Thompson amendment to
the rule, which simply deletes the ref-
erence to H.R. 7189, be adopted, and the
rule be adopted, so we proceed with the
legislation.
H.R. 7189 was a separate bill that was
considered in separate fashion by the
committee. It was not a part of the Sur-
face Transportation Act. This legislation
may have merit for the gentleman from
Hawaii, and I understand his efforts to
do this and understand why it was placed
in the rule by him. But this is a contro-
versial national issue. It is before the
Committee on Education and Labor.
Those of us on the Committee on Inter-
state and Foreign Commerce did not want
to bring this before the House as part of
our bill.
It is not part of our effort to have this
considered in this rule and therefore I
hope the Members will vote down the
previous question and support the
Thompson amendment and then we will
proceed with the Surface Transportation
Act on its merits in the manner in which
It was voted out of the committee. The
Surface Transportation Act has been ex-
Approved For Release 2001/11/01 : CIA-RDP76M00527R000700170022-2
 Approved For Release 2001/11/01 : CIA-RDP76M00527R000700170022-2
De6ember 9, 1974 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-HOUSE
congressional committees of counsel who
would have been required to take the po-
sition that the materials were public
property.
Ms. HOLTZMAN. I understand the ex-
planation the gentleman is giving me. It
seems to me a little bit inconsistent, how-
ever, to take the position that we, 435
Members of Congress, do not want to de-
cide the matter of ownership but instead
will leave it to the courts to decide, but
at the same time we are not permitting
an adversary proceeding to take place be-
cause the Department of Justice has al-
ready made the decision that the tapes
and the Presidential papers of Richard
Nixon belong to him. I am concerned
there will not be an adequate adversary
presentation of this issue of ownership.
However, I will not object.
Mr. BRADEMAS. Mr. Speaker, I ap-
preciate the observations of the gentle-
woman. I sincerely hope the Department
of Justice will be a serious adversary in
any litigation regarding the issue of own-
ership and that there will be an adequate
adversary presentation.
Mr. Speaker, I would like to say that
the substance of the House provision de-
leted by the Senate amendment was orig-
inally proposed by the gentlewoman from
New York (Ms. HOLTZMAN) and I appre-
ciate her interest in this provision and
her strong support of this legislation.
Ms. HOLTZMAN. Mr. Speaker, I with-
draw my reservation of objection.
The SPEAKER. Is there objection to
the request of the gentleman from Indi-
ana?
There was no objection.
The Senate amendments to the House
amendment were concurred in.
A motion to reconsider was laid on
the table.
GENERAL LEAVE
Mr. 1RADEMAS. Mr. Speaker, I ask
unanimous consent that all Members
may have 5 legislative days in which to
revise and extend their remarks on the
legislation just considered.
The SPEAKER. Is there objection to
the request of the gentleman from In-
diana?
There was no objection.
PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION
OF H.R. 5385, SURFACE TRANSPOR-
TATION ACT OF 1974
Mr. MATSUNAGA. Mr. Speaker, by
direction of the Committee on Rules, I
call up House Resolution 1485 and ask
for its immediate consideration.
The Clerk read the resolution as fol-
lows :
H. RES. 1485
Resolved, That upon the adoption of this
resolution it shall be in order to move that
the House resolve itself into the Committee
of the Whole House on the State of the
Union for the consideration of the bill (H.R.
5385) to restore and maintain a healthy
transportation system, to provide financial
assistance, to improve competitive equity
among surface transportation modes, to im-
prove the process of Government regulation,
and for other purposes. After general de-
bate, which shall be confined to the bill and
shall continue not to exceed one hour, to
be equally divided and controlled by the
chairman and ranking minority member of
the Committee on Interstate and Foreign
Commerce, the bill shall be read for amend-
ment under the five-minute rule. It shall be
in order to consider the amendment in the
nature of a substitute recommended blr the
Committee on Interstate and Foreign Com.-
merce sow printed in the bill as an original
bill for the purpose of amendment under
the five-minute rule, said substitute shall
be read for amendment by titles instead of
by sections, and all points of order against
section 102 of said substitute for failure
to comply with the provisions of clause 4,
rule 34XI are hereby waived. It shall he in
order to consider without the intervention
of any point of order the text of the bill
H.R. 7189 if offered as an amendment to the
committee amendment in the nature of a
substitute. At the conclusion of the con-
sideration of the bill H.R. 5385 for amend-
ment, the Committee shall rise and report
the-bill to the House with such amendments
as me.y have been adopted, and any Mem-
ber may demand a separate vote in the House
on any amendment adopted in the Commit-
tee of the Whole to the bill or to the com-
mittes amendment in the nature of a sub-
stitute. The previous question shall be con-
sidered as ordered on the bill and anmend-
ment3 thereto to final passage without
intervening motion except one motion to
recorimit with or without instructions. After
the passage of H.R. 5385, the Committee on
Interstate and Foreign Commerce shall be
discharged from the further consideration
of tl: a bill S. 1149, and it shall - then be in
order in the House to move to strike cut all
after the enacting clause of the said Sen-
ate bill and insert in lieu thereof the pro-
visions of H.R. 5385 as passed by the House.
The SPEAKER. The gentleman from
Hawaii is recognized for 1 hour.
Mr. MATSUNAGA. Mr. Speaker, I
yieli 30 minutes to the gentleman from
Nel;raska (Mr. MARTIN), pending which
I yield myself such time as I may con-
sume. Mr. Speaker, House Resolution
1483 provides for consideration of H.R.
5385, which, as reported by our Commit-
tee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce,
would, among other things, restore and
maintain a healthy national surface
transportation system, provide needed fi-
nancial assistance, improve competitive
equity among surface transportation
me des, and improve the process of Gov-
ernment regulation of the railroads. The
resolution provides an open rule with 1
hoar of general debate, with the time
being equally divided between, and con-
trolled by, the chairman of the commit-
tee and the ranking minority member.
After general debate, the bill would be
read for amendment under the 5-minute
rule. It would be in order, under the
5-minute rule, to consider the amend-
ment in the nature of a substitute
recommended by the Committee on
Ir terstate and Foreign Commerce and
watch is now printed in the bill as an
original. bill. The substitute would be
read for amendment by titles instead of
b:i sections, and all points of order
against section 102 of the substitute for
failure to comply with the provisions of
c:.ause 4, rule XXI, would be waived.
It would also be in order to consider
without the intervention of any point o*'
order, the text of the bill, H.R.. 7189, If
cifered as an amendment to the commit-
tee amendment in the nature of a sub-
stitute.
H 11445
. At the conclusion of the consideration
of H.R. 5385 for amendment, the com-
mittee will rise and report the bill to the
House with such amendments as may
have been adopted, and any member may
demand a separate vote in the House on
any amendment adopted in the Commit-
tee of the Whole to the bill or to the
amendment in the nature of a substitute.
The previous question will be consid-
ered as ordered on the bill and amend-
ments thereto to final passage without
intervening motion except one motion to
recommit with or without instructions.
After the passage of H.R. 5385, the Com-
mittee on Interstate and Foreign Com-
merce will be discharged from the further
consideration of the bill, S. 1149, and it
will then be in order in the House to
move to strike out all after the enacting
clause of S. 1149 and to insert in lieu
thereof the provisions of H.R. 5385 as
passed by the House.
Mr. Speaker, several decades ago.
America's rail network was its lifeline.
Most of the country's freight and travel-
ers were carried by the railroads. The
railroad industry was then in excellent
financial condition. But all that has
Changed in recent years.
Today, railroads move less than 40 per-
^ent of the intercity freight, and only a
traction of the intercity passengers. Ma-
jor rail companies In the Northeast are
in bankruptcy, and several others in the
Midwest are in serious financial difficul-
ties.
The rail Industry just did not keep up
with an expanding economy and a fast-
changing technological revolution. How-
ever, irrespective of the question of the
industry's lack of necessary innovations,
government-at both State and Federal
levels-must assume Its share of the
blame. The cumbersome, slow process of
ratemaking, division of rates, merger
proposals and other vital -matters to the
industry have caused enormous road-
blocks to rapid, necessary changes in
the industry.
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 5385 is designed to
give new life to America's rail Industry.
Based on the industry's urgent needs, the
reported bill, for example, would:
First, Provide Federal Government
backing for up to $2 billion in loans for
railroads to modernize and develop their
physical plant and acquire new freight
cars;
Second, authorize an appropriation of
$15 million to the Secretary of Trans-
portation to conduct two studies: Na-
tional freight car utilization system and
railroad electrification study.
Third, ban discriminatory taxation of
transportation property by States or
their subdivisions.
Fourth, give the Interstate Comm--rce
Commission a maximum period of 2
years, from the date of enactment of the
bill., to establish and maintain standards
for determination of adequate rate levels
for surface transportation modes; and
Fifth, mandate or prohibit certain
other ICC activities, all designed to assist
the railroads and their employees.
Mr. Speaker, the only cost of the pro-
gram provided under H.R. 5385 will be
the $15 million authorized for the De-
partment of Transportation studies, un-
Approved For Release 2001/11/01 : CIA-RDP76M00527R000700170022-2
 Approved For Release 2001/11/01 : CIA-RDP76M00527R000700170022-2
H 11444
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD -HOUSE December 9, 4974
paid out of the general fund of the Treasury
of the United States such amount or amounts
as may be adjudged just by that court."
These amendments combine two sec-
tions in the House-passed measure-sec-
tions 103 and 106-to make clear that the
U.S. District Court for the District of
Columbia shall have exclusive jurisdic-
tion to hear all challenges to this legis-
lation, including challenges to the
legal and constitutional validity of this
title and any challenge regarding the
question of title, custody, possession, or
control of these tapes and materials and
the payment of "just compensation"
which may be required. The amendment
also deletes the provision for a three-
judge court with direct appeal to the
Supreme Court. This amendment would
thereby enable a single judge of the
U.S. District Court for the District of
Columbia to hear any challenge to this
legislation. The amendment provides
that any challenges to this legislation
receive priority consideration and that
all appeals be heard on an expedited
basis.
The amendment would allow for an
expeditious review of any legal challenge
to this legislation. There is now pending
before a single-judge District Court for
the District of Columbia a proceeding in
which the major issues have already been
briefed and argued and in which the
major parties are present. Under the
amendment, the pleadings in the pend-
ing litigation could be amended to take
into account additional issues regarding
the validity of the legislation and the
United States could be added as a de-
fendant to any claim for compensation
by Mr. Nixon.
The amendment also deletes the ex-
press language in the House-passed bill
which provides that the bill takes no
position on ownership of the material
prior to enactment.
The legislation still takes no position
on ownership. However, the Senate felt
that this language was unnecessary be-
cause the legislative history in the Sen-
ate and House is clear on this point.
(1) on.page 14, line 22, delete section 107,
relating to participation in certain court
actions by the appointment of a special
counsel.
Section 107 was initially proposed to
respond to the problem of relying on the
Department of Justice to -epresent the
public interest in any challenge to this
legislation in view of Attorney General
Saxbe's legal opinion which concluded
that the material is Nr. Nixon's private
property.
The Senate amendment deletes a pro-
vision in the House-passed bill that au-
thorizes the House Administration Com-
mittee and the Senate Government Op-
erations Committee to appoint, either
jointly or separately, a special counsel
to intervene in relevant litigation to in-
sure proper and adequate presentation
of the issues.
This section was deleted by the Sen-
ate because it was felt to be inconsistent
with a fundamental assumption of this
legislation that the Congress, in this bill,
is taking no position on ownership of
the material prior to enactment of the
legislation. This section in the House bill
would provide for the appointment by
congressional committees of counsel who
would be required to take the position
that the tapes and materials are public
property.
Further, the amendment was viewed
by. the Senate as unnecessary for the
following reason. The new "judicial re-
view" section, section 105, would provide
that any challenge to this legislation -
could be considered as part of litigation
which is now pending in the U.S. District
Court for the District of Columbia. Since
most of the issues in this litigation have
been fully briefed and competently
argued, and since the issues in any chal-
lenge to this litigation will be essentially
the same, the public interest will be fully
represented. And, if it becomes apparent
that a particular point may not be ade-
quately represented, the judge presiding
over such litigation could appoint an
amicus curiae to argue these points.
Mr. CLEVELAND. Mr. Speaker, pro-
ceeding further, under my objection, the
gentleman from Indiana has explained
the Senate amendments. I was interested
in the reason why they deleted the lan-
guage that referred to title. I would
like to ask him if he is fully satisfied
with the legislative history in both the
Senate and House which has made clear
that this legislation is in no way going
to be interpreted as affecting title to or
ownership of Presidential papers, et
Mr. BRADEMAS. Mr. Speaker, I agree
fully with the interpretation of the gen-
tleman from New Hampshire.
Mr. CLEVELAND. With that assur-
ance, Mr. Speaker, I withdraw my res-
ervation of objection.
Mr. DENNIS. Mr. Speaker, further re-
serving the right to object, can my friend
from Indiana tell me whether all the
Senate amendments. are germane?
Mr. BRADEMAS, Yes.
Mr. DENNIS. And why is it that we
are proceeding here on this rather com-
plicated matter without any conference
report before us?
Mr. BRADEMAS. I might respond to
my colleague by reminding him that last
week we did pass this bill by unanimous
vote, by voice vote. It was therefore not
thought to be controversial.
The bill was reported by-the subcom=
mittee unanimously, reported by the
Committee on House Administration by
a vote of 20 to 0, and, as I have just said,
was unanimously approved by the House.
Because it did not seem to be a contro-
versial matter and because it was worked
out with close bipartisan cooperation,
most particularly with the help of the
gentleman from New Hampshire (Mr.
CLEVELAND) and the gentleman from
Idaho (Mr. HANSEN), it was thought quite
appropriate to move on the bill today.
Mr. DENNIS. Will the gentleman yield
further?
Mr. BRADEMAS. Yes.
Mr. DENNIS. As I understand it, the
bill does preserve the right to determine
the question whether these papers are
personal property of the former Presi-
dent and to litigate that, and it provides
that if it is held that they are, that there
will be compensation, as provided by the
Constitution; is that correct?
Mr. BRADEMAS. The gentleman is
correct.
Mr. DENNIS. If I may ask the gentle-
man a further question, why is it that
the possibility of raising those questions
is confined only to one U.S. district
court,-namely, that in the District of
Columbia, rather than being able to bring
it in the district of southern California,
or elsewhere, as would normally be the
case?
Mr. BRADEMAS. The answer to that
question is, of course-if my colleague
from Indiana will yield further-most of
the materials which are presently in-
volved in this particular matter are
located here within the District of Co-
lumbia or the Metropolitan Washington
area, and most of the participants, more-
over, are in this area.
Mr. DENNIS. I might ,point out to the
gentleman that if the former President
should want to litigate the question-
and I should imagine that he might be
one who might wish to do so-he is
located in the California district, but he
would have to come here to do it, which
is a somewhat unusual provision.
. Mr. BRADEMAS. If I may respond
to my colleague, it is my understanding
that the former President is at present
litigating with respect to many of these
issues now and is represented here in the
District of Columbia by counsel.
Mr. DENNIS. Mr. Speaker, on the
representation that my friend from New
Hampshire is reasonably well satisfied
and that my colleague from Indiana is
more than reasonably well satisfied, I
will withdraw my reservation.
Mr. BRADEMAS. I thank my colleague.
The SPEAKER. Is there objection to
the request of the gentleman from
Indiana?
Ms. HOLTZMAN. Mr. Speaker, reserv-
ing the right to object, I would like to ask
the gentleman from Indiana a question
with respect to the Senate amendments,
because I am concerned, too, about who
will represent the interests of the people
of the United States on the questions as
to who will ultimately have title, wheth-
er or not there is to be just compensa-
tion paid.
It is my understanding that the Sen-
ate at the conference deleted an amend-
ment that would have permitted the
House committee and the Senate com-
mittee to appoint a counsel; is that cor-
rect?
Mr. BRADEMAS. Yes. If the gentle-
woman will yield-
Ms. HOLTZMAN. I will be happy to
yield. -
Mr. BRADEMAS. We did not go to con-
ference on this matter. The section was
deleted by the Senate, and the point that
was made by the Senate was that it was
inconsistent to have such an arrange-
ment, in view of the fundamental as-
sumption of the legislation, that Con-
gress, in acting on this bill, was not tak-
ing any position on ownership of the ma-
terial prior to enactment of the statute.
Under the House version of the bill, pro-
vision was made for the appointment by
Approved For Release 2001/11/01 : CIA-RDP76M00527R000700170022-2
 Approved For Release 2001/11/01 : CIA-RDP76M00527R000700170022-2
December 9, 1974 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD -HOUSE
Speaker's desk the bill (S. 4016) to pro-
tect and preserve tape recordings of con-
versations involving former President
Richard M. Nixon and -made during his
tenure as President, and for other pur-
poses, with Senate amendments to the
House amendment thereto, and concur
in the Senate amendments.
The Clerk read the title of the bill.
The Clerk. read the Senate amend-
nients, as follows:
Page 3, line 4, of the House engrossed
amendment, after "as" Insert: "hereafter".
Page 3, line 21, of the House engrossed
amendment, strike out "purpose," and in-
sert: "purpose which is consistent with the
provisions of this title, subsequent and".
Page 3, line 22, of the House engrossed
amendment, strike out "104" and Insert;
"103".
Page 4, line 2, of the House engrossed
amendment, strike out "current".
Page 4, line 4, of the House engrossed
amendment, strike out "104" and Insert
"103".
Page 4, of the House engrossed amend-
ment, strike out lines 5 to 16, inclusive.
Page 4 line 19, of the House engrossed
amendment, strike out "104" and insert:
;.103".
Page 5, line 4. of the House engrossed
amendment, strike out "105" and insert
"104".
Page 6, of the House engrossed amend-
ment, strike out lines 1 to 7, inclusive, and
insert:
"(6) the need to provide public access to
those materials which have general historical
significance, and which are not. likely to be
related to the need described In paragraph
4I); and".
Page 7, line 6, of the House engrossed
amendment, after "the" the second time it
appears insert: "Senate and the".
Page 7, line 7, of the House engrossed
amendment. after "Representatives," insert:
"respectiveh,".
Page 7, line 8, of the House engrossed
amendment strike out "the House," and in-
sert: "each House, respectively,".
Page 7, cf the House engrossed amend-
ment, strike out line 12 and insert: "of either
House to change such rules (as far as relat-
ing to the procedures of that House) at".
Page 7, line 14, of the House engrossed
amendment, stirke out "the " where it ap-
pears the second time and insert: "that".
Page 7, lines 14 and 15, of the House en-
grossed amendment, strike out "in the House
of Representatives".
Page 7, tine 17, of the House engrossed
amendment, after "House" insert: "or by the
President of the Senate, as the case may be".
Page 8, sine 10, of the House engrossed
amendment, strike out "in the House of
Representatives".
Page 8 of the House engrossed amend-
ment, after line 24 insert:
"(d) The provisions of this title shall not
in any way affect the rights, limitations, and
exemption:; applicable under the Freedom of
Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 1552 et seq.
Page 9, of the House engrossed amend-
ment, strike out lines 2 to 13, Inclusive, and
insert:
"SEc. 105. (a) The United States District
Court for the District of Columbia shall have
exclusive jurisdiction to hear challenges to
the legal or constitutional validity of this
title or of any regulation issued under the
authority granted by this title, and any ac-
tion or proceeding involving the question
of title, ownership, custody, possession, or
control of any tape recording or material re-
ferred to in section 101 or to payment of any
Just compensation which may be due in con-
nection therewith. Any such challenge shall
be treated by the court as a matter requir-
ing immediate consideration and resolution
and shall have priority on the docket of such
court over other cases."
Page 9, after line 21, of the House en-
grossed amendment, insert:
"(c) If a final. decision of such court holds
that any provision of this title has deprived
an individual of private property without just
compensation, then there shalt be paid out
of the general fund of the Treasury of the
United States such amount or amounts as
may be adjudged just by that court."
Page 9, of the House engrossed amend-
ment, strike out all after line 21 over to and
including: line 10 on page 10.
Page f3, line 12, of the House engrossed
amendment, strike out "108" and insera:
"106".
The SPEAKER. Is there objection to
the reruest of the gentleman from
Indiana?
Mr. CLEVELAND. Mr. Speaker, I re-
serve the right to object so I may inquire
of the gentleman from Indiana about
the chr.nges which were made in the
Senate to this legislation. I assume the
gentlerr an will address himself to that
point. It Is difficult to digest the changes
in the very few moments that I have had
access to them.
Mr. 73RADEMAS. Mr. Speaker, if my
colleague, the gentleman from New
Hamps. mire, will yield, that is what I pro-
pose to do.
Mr. CLEVELAND. Mr. Speaker, I yield
to the gentleman from Indiana for the
purpose of making that explanation.
(Mr. 13RADEMAS asked and was. given
permission to revise and extend his
remark s.)
Mr. 73RADEMAS. Mr. Speaker. S. 4016
would provide that the Federal Govern-
ment xetain custody of the Nixon tapes
and other Presidential material and
would establish a 17-member commission
to study the handling of documents of
all Federal officials.
S. 416 was passed by the House on
Tuesday, December 3, 1974, under Sus-
pension of the Rules, by unanimous voice
vote.
The Senate amendments are gen-
erally technical and clarifying in nature:
(a) On page 8, line 4, after the word "as",
add tha following: "hereafter."
This; will make clear that the tapes
and other materials may be destroyed
only as provided by a law enacted in the
future, not by an existing law,
(b) On page 8, line 21, after the word
"purpose", delete the comma (",") and add
the following: "which is consistent with the
provisions of this title, subsequent and;"
This is to make clear that Mr. Nixon's
right of access shall be consistent with
the provisions of this title: for example,
that the originals cannot be removed
from the Washingotn metropolitan area,
and they shall not be destroyed and that
access shall not be provided until se-
curit;r regulations have been issued pur-
suam; to section 103.
(c) On page 9, line 1, delete the following:
"currant."
This is a technical amendment to snake
clear that the Government may use the
material for any official lawful purpose.
(d) On page 11, line 1, subsection (6)
would read as follows:
"(C) the need to provide access to those
H 11443
materials which have general historical sig-
nificance, and which are not likely to be re-
lated to the need described In paragraph
(1)."
TF.F.e phrase "related to the Presidency
of Richard M. Nixon" has been deleted
from this section in the House-passed
bill because it is redundant.
The phrase "in a manner which is con-
sistent with procedures which have been
used to provide public access to mate-
rials of former Presidents" has been de-
leted because it could be interpreted to
mean that Richard M. Nixon could direct
the Administrator to place restrictions
on access to the Presidential material.
The inteniton of that phrase was to allow
the Administrator to place limited re-
strictions on access to material which
mar bear on national security or which
ma,- be particularly sensitive.
In my judgment, the other subsections
of section 104 provides an adequate basis
for the Administrator to limit general ac-
cess or to set timetables for access where
apr :'opriate.
Further, the language deleted suggests
that there is some established procedure
for determining access to Presidential
materials; however, procedures utilized
by former Presidents have not been uni-
for'n. While GSA might want to refer to
other Presidential experiences in devising
regulations, it may be confusing if they
art explicitly instructed to conform their
regulations to some set of procedures
which do not exist.
(-) On page 12, line 6, and all related
am ~ndme nts.
These amendments simply conform the
Se _ate procedure for disapproving regu-
lai.ions issued by the Administrator to the
procedure for House disapproval which is
in the House-passed bill.
f) On page 13, line 24, delete the period
("e") and insert in lieu thereof the following:
(d) The provisions of this title shall not
in any way affect the rights, limitations or
ex.ensions applicable under the 'Freedom of
In"ormation Act, 6 U.S.C., sec. 552, et seq.' "
This language is Intended to make clear
that access to the material which may
otherwise be authorized by the Freedom
of Information Act shall not be limited
by the provisions of this title.
:g) On page 9, delete lines 4 through 15:
prge 14, delete lines 2 through 13 and insert
in lieu thereof the following:
"SEC. 105. (a) The United States District
Court for the District of Columbia shall have
exclusive jurisdiction to hear challenges to
the legal or constitutional validity of this
title or of any regulation issued under the
ai 1 thority granted by this title and any action
os proceeding involving the question of title,
ownership, custody, possession, or control of
any tape recording or material referred to
its See. 101, or involving payment of any just
compensation which may be due In connec-
t!on therewith. Any such challenge shall be
treated by the court as a matter requiring
Immediate consideration and resolution, and
stall have priority on the docket of such
court o?7er other cases."
(h) On page 14, at line 21, insert the fol-
1,wing new subsection:
"(c) If a final decision of the United States
District Court for the District of Columbia
holds that any provision of this title has de-
prived an individual of private property with-
( tit just compensation, then there shall be
Approved For Release 2001/11/01 : CIA-RDP76M00527R000700170022-2
 Approved For Release 2001/11/01 : CIA-RDP76M00527R000700170022-2
December 9, 1974 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD -HOUSE
Mr. Moorhead of Pennsylvania and Mr.
Broomfield for, with Mr. Fisher against.
Mr. ;Bangel and Mr. Rodlno for, with Mr.
Mills agipst
Mr. Coin and Mr. McFall for, with Mr.
Gray againsii
Mr. Robis of New York and Mrs. Chis.
holm for, with' s. Holt against.
Mr. Rostenki and Mr. Cotter for, with
Mr. Clark against:
Until further no
Mr. Howard with Mr shleman.
Mr. Carey of New Yorith Mrs. Green of
Mr. Blatnik with Mrs. Griffiths,
Mr. Chappell with Mr. Luken.
Mr. Evins of Tennessee with Mr. Holi
Mr. Donohue with Mr. Bell.
Mr. Reuss with Mr. MeSpadden.
Mr. Brown of California With Mr. Brown
of Ohio.
Mr. Jones of North Carolina with MTir'.
Chamberlain.
Mr. Ryan with Mr. Devine.
Mr. Meeds with Mr. Minshall of Ohio.
Mr. Grover with Mr. Maraziti.
Mr. Hillis with Mr. Mathias of California.
Mr. Macdonald with Mr. Railsback.
Mr. Ruppe with Mr. Roncallo of New York.
Mr. Sandman with Mr. Schneebeli.
Mr. Towell of Nevada with Mr. Wyman.
The result of the vote was announced
as above recorded. -
ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. FuL-
TON). Pursuant to the provisions of
clause 3 (b) of rule XXVIII, the Chair
announces that he will reduce to a mini-
mum of 5 minutes the period of time
within which a vote by electronic device
may be taken on all of the additional
motions to suspend the rules on which
the Chair has postponed further pro-
ceedings.
FLOOD DAMAGE
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. FUL-
ToN). The unfinished business is the
question of suspending the rules and
passing the Senate bill (S. 2201). -
The Clerk read the title of the bill.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The ques-
tion is on the motion offered by the gen-
tleman from Louisiana (Mr. BREAUX)
that the House suspend the rules and
pass the Senate bill (S. 2201), on which
the yeas and nays were ordered.
The vote was taken by electronic de-
vice and there were-yeas 172, nays 185,
not voting 77, as follows:
[Roll No. 6591
YEAS-172
Abzug
Bowen
Clay
Adams
Brademas
Cochran
Addabbo
Breaux
Collins, Ill.
Alexander
Breckinridge
Conyers
Anderson,
Brinkley
Corman
Calif. _
Brooks
Culver
Annunzio
Burke, Calif.
Daniels,
Armstrong
Burke, Fla.
Dominick V.
Aspin
Burke, Mass.
Davis, S.C.
Barrett
Burlison, Mo.
de la Garza
Bennett
Burton, John
Dellums
Bergiand
Burton, Phillip Denholm
Bevill
Carney, Ohio
Dent
Bingham
Casey, Tex.
Diggs
Blatnik
Clausen,.
Dingell
Bolling
Don H.
Dorn
Downing Kyros
Dulski Leggett
Eckhardt Lehman
Edwards, Calif. Long, La.
Esch Lott
Fascell McCloskey
Flood McCormack
Flynt Madden
Foley Mathis, Ga.
Ford Matsunaga
Fountain Melcher .
Fraser Metcalfe
Fulton Mezvinsky
Fuqua Mitchell, Md.
Gettys Mizell
Gilman Moakley
Ginn Moorhead, Pa.
Goldwater Morgan
Gonzalez Moss
Gubser Murphy, Ill.
Hanley Murphy, N.Y.
Hanna Nedzl
Hanrahan Nix
Hansen, Wash. Obey
Harrington Owens
Hawkins Patten
Hebert Pepper
Hechler, W. Va. Perkins
Heckler, Mass. Pickle
Helstoski Poage
H man Reid
Hos Reuss
Hun Rhodes
Johns Calif. Roberts
Jones, A Roe
Jones, Te Roncalio, Wyo.
Jordan Rooney;.Pa.
Karth Rose
Kazen ousselot
Kluczynski Germain
Koch banes
Abdnor
Anderson, Ill.
Andrews,
N. Dak.
Archer
Arends
Ashley
Bafalis
Baker
Bauman
Beard
Biaggi
Biester
Blackburn
Boland
Bray
Brotzman
Brown, Mich.
Broyhill, N.C.
Broyhill, Va.
Buchanan
Burgener
Burleson, Tex.
Butler
Camp
Carter
Cederberg
Clancy
Cleveland
Collier
Collins, Tex.
Conable
Conlan
Conte
Coughlin
Crane
Cronin
YS-i 85
Green
Gross
Gude
Gunter
Guyer
Hamilton
Hammer-
schmidt
H11441
Schroeder
Wyatt
Yatron
Young, S.C.
.Seiberling
Wydler
Young, Fla.
Zion
Shuster
Si
k
Wylie
Young, Ill.. ,
Zwach
s
Smith, Iowa
NOT VOTING-77
Staggers
Andrews. N.C.
Flowers
Mink
Stanton,
Ashbrook
Giaimo
Minshall, Ohio
J. William
Badillo
Grasso
Mosher
Stanton,
Bell
Gray
Passman
James V.
Boggs
Green, Oreg.
Podell
Stark
Brasco
Griffiths
Price, Tex.
Stephens
Broomfield
Grover
Railsback
Stokes
Brown; Calif.
Haley
Rangel
Stubblefield
Brown, Ohio
Hays
Rarick
Stuckey
Byron
Hulls
Robison, N.Y.
Studds
Carey, N.Y.
Holifield
Rodino
Sullivan
Chamberlain
Horton
Rogers
Symington
Chappell
Howard
Roncallo, N.Y.
Teague
Chisholm
Jones, N.C.
Rooney, N.Y.
Thompson, N.J.
Clark
Landrum
Rostenkowski
Thornton
Clawson, Del
Latta
Roybal
Tiernan
Cohen
Long, Md.
Ruppe
Traxler
Cotter
Luken
Ryan
Treen
Danielson
McFall
Sandman
Udall
Davis, Ga.
McSpadden
Schneebel l
Ullman
Van Deerlin
Donohue
Madigan
Taylor, Mo.
Vander Veen
Eilberg
Maraziti
Towell, Nov.
Vanik
Eshleman
Mathias
Calif.
Wyman
Waggonner
Evins, Tenn.
,
Meeds
Young, Alaska
Waldie
Whit
Fisher
Mills
e
Whitten
So (two-thirds not having voted in
Wilson, Bob
favor thereof) the motion was rejected.
Wilson,
Charles H.,
The Clerk announced the .following
Calif.
pairs:
Wilson, On this vote:
Charles, Tex.
Wrrieht Mrs. Boggs and Mr. Rodino for, with Mr.
Yates
Young, Ga.
Young, Tex.
Zabiocki
Nelsen
Nichols
O'Brien
O'Hara
O'Neill
Parris
Patman
Heinz Quill
Hinshaw Rees
Holt Regula
Huber Riegle
Hudnut Rinaldo
Hunt Robinson, V
Hutchinson Rosenthal
Ichord Roush
Jarman Roy
Johnson, Colo. Runnels
Johnson, Pa.
Jones, Okla.
Kastenmetor
Kemp
Ketchum
King
Kuykendall
Lagomarsino
Landgrebe
Lent
Litton
Lujan
McClory
McCollister
Daniel, Dan McDade
Daniel, Robert McEwen
W., Jr. McKay
Davis, Wis. McKinney
Delaney Mahon
Delienback Mallary
Dennis Mann
Derwinski Martin, Nebr.
Ruth
Sarasin
Satterfield
Scherle
Sebelius
Shoup
Shriver
Sikes
Skubitz
Slack
Smith, N.Y.
Snyder
Spence
Steed
Steele
Steelman
Steiger, Ariz,
Steiger,.Wis.
Stratton
Symms
Talcott
Taylor, N.C.
Dickinson Martin, N.C. Thomson, Wis.
Drinan Mayne Thorre
Duncan Mazzoli Vander Jagt
du Pont Michel Veysey
Edwards, Ala. Milford Vigorito
Erlenborn Miller Walsh
Evans, Colo. Minish Wampler
Findley Mitchell, N.Y. Ware
Fish Mollohan Whalen
Forsythe Montgomery Whitehurst
Frelinghuysen Moorhead, Widnall
Frenzel Calif. Wiggins
Frey Murtha Williams
Froehlich Myers Winn
Gaydos Natcher Wolff
Rarick against.
Until further notice:
Mr. Hays with Mr. Rooney of New York.
Mr. Chappell with Mr. Gray.
Mr. Cotter with Mr. Rarick.
Mr. Rostenkowski with Mrs. Griffiths.
Mr. Howard with Mr. Carey of New York.
Mr. Donohue with Mr. Davis of Georgia.
Mr. Eilberg with Mr. Fisher.
Mr. Evins of Tennessee with Mr. Luken.
Mr. Macdonald with Mr. Chamberlain.
Mr. McFall with Mr. Ashbrook.
Mrs. Mink with Mr. Del Clawson.
Mr. Giaimo with Mr. Devine.
Mr. Flowers with Mrs. Grasso.
Mr. Haley with Mr. Bell.
Mr. Brown of California with Mr. Grover.
Mr. Badillo with Mr. Holifield.
Mrs. Chisholm with Mrs. Green of Oregon.
Mr. Meeds with Mr. Hillis.
Mr. Shipley with Mr. Horton.
Mr. Ryan with Mr. Jones of North Caro-
lina.
Mr. Rogers with Mr. Latta.
Mr. Rangel with Mr. Clark.
. Andrews of North Carolina with Mr.
gan. -
Mr. Lo
den.
Mr. Roybal
Mr. Cohen
Mr. Eshleman
Mr. Passman
Mr. Sandman wi
York.
Mr. Young of Alaska
Nevada.
The result of the vote-was announced
as above recorded.
REPEALING THE REQUIREMENT
THAT COMMANDERS OF AIR
FORCE FLYING UNITS BE PILOTS
The SPEAKER. The unfinished busi-
ness is the question of suspending the
rules and passing the Senate bill, S. 3906.
Approved For Release 2001/11/01 : CIA-RDP76M00527R000700170022-2
 H.11442
L J_Q S{o(
.c
Approved For Release 2001/11/01 : CIA-RDP76M00527R000700170022-2
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOUSE December 9, 1974
The Clerk read the title of the Senate
bill.
The SPEAKER. The question is on the
motion offered by the gentleman from
New York (Mr. STRATTON) that the
House suspend the rules and pass the
Senate bill, S. 3906.
The question was taken; and (two-
thirds having voted in favor thereof)
the rules were suspended and the Sen-
ate bill was passed.
A motion to reconsider was laid on the
table.
A House resolution (H. Res. 1421) was
laid on the table.
VETERANSAND SURVIVORS PEN-
SION ADJUSTMENT ACT OF 1974
The SPEAKER. The unfinished busi-
ness is the question of suspending the
rules and passing the Senate bill, S. 4040,
as amended.
The Clerk read the title of the Senate
bill.
The SPEAKER. The question is on the
motion offered by the gentleman from
South Carolina (Mr. DORN) that the
House sus;?end the rules and pass the
Senate bill. S. 4040, as amended, on which
the yeas and nays have been ordered.
The vote was taken by electronic de-
vice, and there were-yeas 357, nays 1,
not voting 76, as follows:
[Roll No. 6601
YEAS-357
Abdnor
Cederberg
Flynt
Abzug
Clancy
Foley
Adams
Clausen,
Ford
Addabbo
Don H.
Forsythe
Anderson,
Clay-
Fountain
Calif.
Cleveland
Fraser
Anderson, Ill.
Cochran
Frelinghuysen
Andrews,
Collins, 111.
Frenzel
N. Dak.
Collins, Tex.
Frey
Annunzio
Conable
Froehlich
Archer
Conlan
Fulton
Arends
Conte
Fuqua
Armstrong
Conyers
Gaydos
Ashley
Corman
Gettys
Aspin
Coughlin
Gibbons
Batalis
Crane
Gilman
Baker
Cronin
Ginn
Barrett
Culver
Goldwater
Bauman
Daniel, Dan
Gonzalez
Beard
Daniel, Robert
Goodling
Bennett
W., Jr.
Green, Pa.
Bergland
Daniels,
Gross
Bevill
Dominick V.
Gubser
Biaggi
Davis, S.C.
Gude
Biester
Davis, Wis.
Gunter
Bingham
de is Garza
Guyer
Blackburn
Delaney
Haley
Blatnik
Delleyback
Hamilton
Boland
Dellums
Hammer-
Bolling
Denholm
schmidt
Bowen
Dennis
Hanley
Bray
Dent
Hanna
Breaux
Derwinski
Hanrahan
Breckinridge
Dickinson
Hansen, Idaho
Brinkley
Diggs
Hansen, Wash.
Brooks
Dingell
Harrington
Brotzman
Dorn
Harsha
Brown, Mich.
Downing
Hastings
Broyhill, N.C.
Drinan
Hawkins
Broyhill, Va.
Dulski
Hebert
Buchanan
Duncan
Hechler, W. Va.
Burgener
du Pont
Heinz
Burke, Calif.
Eckhardt
Helstoski
Burke, Fla.
Edwards, Ala.
Henderson
Burke, Mass.
Edwards, Calif. Hicks
Burleson. Tex.
Eilberg
Hinshaw
Burleson, Mo.
ErlenbOrn
Holt
Burton, John
Esch
Holtzman
Burton, Phillip Evans, Colo.
Hosmer
Butler
Fascell
Huber
Camp
Findley
Hudnut
Carney, Ohio
Fish
Hungate
Carter
Flood
Hunt
Casey, Tex.
Flowers
Hutchinson
Ichord
Nedzi
Stark
Jarman
Nelsen
Steed
Johnso a, Calif. Nichols
Steele
Johnsd:i, Colo.
Nix
Steelman
Johnso a, Pa.
Obey
Steiger, Ariz.
Jones, eila.
O'Brien
Steiger, Wis.
Jones, Okla.
O'Hara
Stephens
Jones, Tenn.
O'Neill
Stokes
Jordan
Owens
Stratton
Karth
Parris
Stubblefield
Kasten, neier
Patman
Stuckey
Kazen
Patten
Studds
Kemp
Pepper
Sullivan
Ketchum
Perkins
Symington
King
Pettis
Symms
Kluczy] raki
Peyser
Talcott
Koch
Pickle
Taylor, N.C.
Kuyker.dall
Pike
Teague
Kyros
Poage
Thompson, N.J.
Lagom.rsino
Powell, Ohio
Thomson, Wis,
Leggett
Preyer
Thone
Lehman
Price, Ill.
Thornton
Lent
Price, Tex.
Tiernan
Litton
Pritchard
Traxler
Long, La.
Quie
Treen
Long, M d.
Quillen
Udall
Lott
Randall
Ullman
Lujan
Rees
Van Deerlin
McClor7
Regula
Vander Jagt
McClos ey
Reid
Vander Veen
McCollister
Rhodes
Vanik
McCort tack
Riegle
Veysey
McDade
Rinaldo
Vigorito
McEwen
Roberts
W aggonner
McKay
Robinson, Va.
Waldie
McKinney
Roe
Walsh
Madden
Roncalio, Wyo. Wampler
Madigan
Rooney, Pa.
Ware
Mahon
Rose
Whalen
Mallary
Rosenthal
White
Mann
Roush
Whltehurst
Martin Nebr.
Rousselot
Whitten
Martin, N.C.
Roy
Widnall
Mathis, Ga.
Roybal
Wiggins
Matsur aga
Runnels
Williams
Mayne
Ruth
Wilson, Bob
Mazzola
St Germain
Wilson,
Melcher
Sarasin
Charles H.,
Metcalf e
Sarbanes
Calif.
Mezvin Sky
Satterfield
Wilson,
Michel
Scherle
Charles, Tex.
Milford
Schroeder
Winn
Miller
Sebelius
Wolff
Minish
Seiberling
Wright
Mink
Shoup
Wyatt
Mitche:1, Md.
Shriver
Wydler
Mitchell, N.Y.
Shuster
Wylie
Moakle7
Sikes
Yates
Moliohrn
Sisk
Yatron
Montgc mery
Skubitz
Young, Fla.
Moorhead,
Slack
Young, Ga.
Calif.
Smith, Iowa
Young, 111.
Morgar
Smith, N.Y.
Young, S.C.
Mosher
Snyder
Young, Tex..
Moss
Spence
Zablocki
Murphy, Ill.
Staggers
Zion
Murphy, N.Y.
Stanton,
Zwach
Murths.
J. William
Myers
Stanton,
Natche
James V.
NAYS-1
Landgrebe
NOT VOTING-76
Alexander
Evins, Tenn.
Minshall, Ohio
Andrews, N.C.
Fisher
Mizell
Ashbro )k
Giaimo
Moorhead, Pa.
Badillo
Grasso
Pasaman
Bell
Gray
PodeIl
Boggs
Green, Oreg.
Railsback
Braden as
Griffiths
Rangel
Brasco
Grover
Rarick
Broomfield
Hays
Reuss
Brown, Calif.
Heckler, Mass.
Robison
Brown, Ohio
Hillis
Rodino
Byron
Hogan
Rogers
Chisholm
Jones, N.C,
Ruppe
Clark
Landrum
Ryan
Donohue Meeds
Eshleman Mills
So (two-thirds having voted in favor
thereof) the rules were suspended and
the bill, as amended, was passed.
The Clerk announced the follow pairs:
Mrs. Boggs with Mrs. Green of Oregon.
Mr. Rostenkowski with Mr. Clark.
Mr. Macdonald with Mr. Rooney of New
Ycrk.
Mr. Howard with Mrs. Grasso.
Mr. Cotton with Mrs. Griffiths.
Mr. Byron with Mr. Collier.
Mrs. Chisholm with Mr. Mills.
Mr. Donohue with Mr. Davis of Georgia.
Mr. Landrum with Mr. Rarick.
Mr. Rangel with Mr. Gray.
Mr. Moorhead of Pennsylvania with Mr.
Ryan.
Mr. Shipley with Mt. Chamberlain.
Mr: McFall with W. Luken.
Mr. Brademas with Mr. Hogan.
'Jr. Badillo with Mr. Maraziti.
Mr. Brown of California with Mr. Devine.
Mr. Rodino with Mr. Mathias of California.
'Jr. Rogers with Mr. McSpadden.
Mr. Reuss with Mr. Minshall of Ohio.
Mr. Meeds with Mr. Mizell.
Mr. Evans of Tennessee with Mr. Ashbrook.
Mr. Giaimo with Mr. Passman.
Mr. Carey of New York with.Mr. Eshleman.
Mr. Chappell with Mr. Railsback.
Mr. Danielson with Mr. Broomfield.
Mr. Holifield with Mr. Robison of New York.
Mr. Jones of North Carolina with Mr. Ron-
ca-lo of New York.
Mr. Alexander with Mr: Sandman.
Mr. Andrews of North Carolina with Mr.
Brown of Ohio.
Mr. Del Clawson with Mr. Ruppe.
Mr. Cohen with Mr. Grover.
Mrs. Heckler of Massachusetts with Mr.
Schneebeli.
Mr. Horton with Mr. Taylor of Missouri.
Mr. Latta with Mr. Towell of Nevada.
Mr. Young of. Alaska with Mr. Wyman.
The result of the vote announced as
above recorded.
A motion to reconsider was laid on the
table.
i'URTHER MESSAGE FROM THE
SENATE -
A further message from the Senate
by Mr. Arrington, one of its clerks, an-
nounced that the Senate agrees to the
report of the committee on conference on
tie disagreeing votes of the two Houses
on the amendments of the Senate to the
bill (H.R. 14214) entitled "An at to
amend the Public Health Service Act and
related laws to revise and extend pro-
grams of health revenue sharing and
health services, and for other purposes."
The message also announced that the
Senate agrees to the amendment of the
.-~ar e4iC1i'ndments of the Senate
to a bill of the Senate of the following
titles:
S. 4016. An act to protect and preserve
tape recordings of conversations involving
former President Richard M. Nixon and made
during his tenure as President, and for other
purposes.
PROTECTING AND PRESERVING
TAPE RECORDINGS INVOLVING
FORMER PRESIDENT RICHARD M.
NIXON
Mr. BRADEMAS. Mr. Speaker, I ask
unanimous consent to take from the
Approved For Release 2001/11/01 : CIA-RDP76M00527R000700170022-2