COMMENTS ON NEW DRAFT, 21 APRIL 1951, PREPARED BY CIA IN COMPLIANCE WITH NSC ACTION 282

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00662R000300040024-2
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 28, 1998
Sequence Number: 
24
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 21, 1951
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00662R000300040024-2.pdf98.95 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2000/08/27 : CIA-RDP75-00662R000300040024-2 COMMENTS ON NEW DRAFT, 2L April 1951, PREPARED BY CIA IN COMPLIANCE WITH NSC ACTION 282 Nowhere in the text do I find specific reference to the original NSC 282 request to conduct and organize a study of foreign economic intelligence requirements relating to the national security,"including requirements for mobilization planning." It is, therefore, suggested that this reference be included on page 3, as follows (underlining indicates amendments): Page : "6. Therefore, what is needed is a continuing machinery for inswing that the available economic intelligence resources are mobilized around security issues, including requirements for mobilization planning, problem by problem, and that where adequate economic intelligence on a particular security issue is not being provided by any agency, responsibility for its provision will be clearly allocated." The writer does not concur in statement as worded on page 6. In previous discussions of the subject, it has not been implied that the proposed Economic Intelligence Committee should be a committee with powers of final decision, but rather a committee for purposes of facilitating coordination and for preparing recommendations. The following changes on page 6 are therefore suggested (deletions and underlining indicate amendments): Page 6 "(e) In the establishment of priorities and allocation of responsibilities for the collection and analysis to fill specific gaps in the economic intelligence needed for national security, the deeieieas e? the recommendations of the Economic Intelligence Committee with regard to such intelligence, shall gevepa the activities of the 1AG ageaeies in the same maaaer as deeisieas of be submitted to the Intelligence Advisory Committee for decisions. Similarly, Disagreements disagreements as to priorities and allocations may be referred to the Intelligence Advisory Committee. Where disagreements arise with respect to the activities of non-IAC agencies, the Intelligence Advisory Committee may refer these to the National Security Council." Page 14+15: Section E."Economic analysis relating to the availability, the importance to either set of powers, and the vulnerability to interruption of the flow of specific strategic materials and.,services from other areas, principally Africa and Latin America." The following change is suggested: "The general economic situation in areas other than those outlined in B, C, and D above is important for many aspects of United States policy. Rewever; the The impact on our national security position of general economic conditions, capabilities, and intentions in such regions as Africa and Latin America is of less immediate impertaaee than the seatribat4ea these- areas make to supplies e9 eritieal raw materials needed by considerable since the United States depends vitally upon the strategic raw material resources of these areas, the exportable surplus of which has to be shared by the Western Allies. It should also be noted that part of these raw materials are being exported to the Soviet Bloc and-the Western Allies.4he intelligence most urgently required on these areas, then, is specific details on a limited number of resources and facilities, actual and potential7-rather-than-exhaustive--ee$erage* Approved For Release 2000/08/27 : CIA-RDP75-00662R000300040024-2