CIA FRONT GROUPS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00149R000600180012-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
November 11, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 19, 1999
Sequence Number: 
12
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 1, 1967
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00149R000600180012-7.pdf74.02 KB
Body: 
JAN 2 1967 Release : CIA- CPYRGHT-? ~'?/fi, dt?~s your recent editorial, de- c: iption of t: e Central Intel- ence Agency as standing ltside the law in its capacity ondan,rcring individual se- ", icy With seeming impunity, you overlooked mention of even vaster possibilities for similar type damage inher- er.ti in CIA :rout organizations designoc1 to possess the ob- vious advantage of appearing to be unconnected with covert activities of official .inspira- tion. In such situations,, dam age to individuals is far more insidious if for no other rea- son than the additional diffi- culty of dragging the responsi- ble matrix organization into. the ;publicity spotlight it must preferentially shun. Composed of both agency operatives and "innocents" who are carefully recruited for the timely exploitation of ,heir' professional skills to help mask other activities hardly in keeping with the publicly defined aims and ob- jectives of their apparent em- ployers, front organizations can be and too often are a serious menace to the individ- ual liberties and working ca- reers of their non-CIA affili- ated employes. Many individ- uals of this last category would doubtless' have opted not to join such organizations if their true nature had been manifest to them at the time they were recruited. Other in- dividuals would have been just as content to go along with the acting role required of them and a not insignifi- cant number would have felt happier about being taken into the complete confidence CPYRGHT 180012-7 - FOIAb3b b uSC . them ostensibly in connection with national security i nter- ests and requirements. The basic issue here-and it is but one more concerning which the American public is entitled to an answer - is whether or not the Central In-' telligence Agency has any' moral or legal basis for using and exploiting U.S. citizens, whether in the United States or abroad, without their prior knowledge and fullest consent in, connection with covert ac tivitics while paying them for fulfilling legitimate roles the ultimate success of which are hardly ever allowed, given heir only secondary or tcrti- 'lry importance in relation to the basic purpose of the ma- rix organization in setting up its dummy front.... Worse still in its long range mplications, perhaps, is the image done to the imagery f legitimate organizations in he labor, religious, charitable nd other fields of overseas lctivities by CIA connections vhich may range from levels complete control to that of ontinuing infiltration. It is `uggested that a courageous' ongressional investigation ould certainly bring many urprises to light concerning he extent to which legitimate nd well-intentioned private . ndeavors - not to mention hose deliberately set up for uch purposes - are being sed in connection with sup- osed national security re- tiirements and projections FOIAb3b ome of which at the least al5- or-productive in their con- ('fl CO - JOSEPH J. A'ormcrly of the 41110- tute for Frec Labor Develop. meat (AI-FLD), Washington. L %,/7 x1-o-:3 . Sanitized - Approved For Release : CIA-RDP75-00149R000600180012-7