ATTACK ON HON. J. EDGAR HOOVER

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00149R000400080009-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
November 11, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 17, 1998
Sequence Number: 
9
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 17, 1966
Content Type: 
OPEN
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00149R000400080009-4.pdf108.41 KB
Body: 
Sanitized - Approved pUF6v C4AtbP75- January 3.7; 1966 FOIAb; He states categorically that he never. to complete the picture of this Soviet smear wrote such a letter. For the information campaign, which amounts to character as- of Senators who are present, perhaps I saUSination. ahnnl'i renA the latter int., the Burr,.,, Sincerely yours, They are part of a concerted' Communist The letter is dated January 11, 1966, time of the Senator from Iowa has ex- and reads as follows: pired. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Mr. HICKENLOOPER. Mr. Presi- FEDSRAL BtTPEAU 'or INvrntloATeoN, dent, I ask unanimous consent that I Washington, D.C., January 11, 1960. may proceed for 1 additional minute. Hon. BOURKE B. HICKENLOOPIM, The PRESIDING OFFICER. With- U.S. Senate, out objection, it is so ordered. Washington, D.C. Mr. ? HICKENLOOPER. Let me con- MT DEAR SENATOR: This is to acknowledge, elude by saying, with respect to the sug- your request for the complete facts as known to this Bureau concerning the anonymous ? gestion In Mr. Hoover's letter that I letter you received containing what pur- might have some question about this ports to be a copy of a personal letter to matter, that, the letter was so crude 'former White House aid Walter Jenkins and so scurrilous that on its face it was over my signature. a forgery. At no time have I had any I am pleased to comply with your re- question as to the truth or falsity of the quest and will begin first by stating with- letter. It is false on its face. I mere- out any equivocation that I never wrote ly wish to clear the matter up so that such a letter. The letter you received In one of many all may know that these things are con- anonymous mailings sent to various Son- stantly going on ? as attacks are made store, Congressmen, and other prominent against our law enforcement agencies. the past In this and other countries by the Soviet Disinformation Department proved Ir- refutably that this was a Communist scheme. You may recall that the nefarious schemes of the Soviet Disinformation Department were exposed in a report prepared by the Central Intelligence Agency last year, The details of that A-enc 's st d 1 t u er d smear campaign which was launched a year ago. The campaign began In January 1066, ? when several letters of this type were re- ceived by individuals who also brought them to my attention. Several more were brought to my attention by Individuals who received them in April 1905. Upon examination, the copy of .the letter supposedly signed by me was getermined.to be a crude forgery. Comparison of all the letters disclosed they bars all been prepared by. the same person or persons. Further y w e pr n e ATTACK ON HON. J. EDGAR HOOVER y In the CONGRESSIONAL RECORD of September Mr. HICKENLOOPER. Mr. President, 28, 1995. 1 had Intended, during the morning hour The study revealed that the Soviet DisIn- on last Friday, to discuss this subject, formation Department of the KGB, the and to put in the RECORD a letter dealing Committee for State Security, wages g a broad-scaled propaganda offensive against with it. However, I was not on the floor U.S. agencies and pointed out that when the Senate suddenly adjourned i and the Federal Bureau of Investigation and I did not reach the Chamber quite are priority targets for attacks. It also dis- In time. closed that the overall objective Is to die- The Information contained in the let- credit U.S. agencies here and abroad and em- ter did leak out in some way, however. phasized that a preferred instrument used by For the RECORD I wish to do now what I the Soviets In their attacks Is the forged had Intended to do last Friday, document. Typical of the tactics used in such efforts About 10 days ago, I received a scur- was the circulation of letters in South Amer- rllous anonymous letter, mailed from lea in the summer of 1064 In that case too Baltimore, alleged to contain a photo- my name had been forged on the letters. static copy of a letter which was alleged They were designed to make it appear that by the writer of the anonymous letter to the Federal Bureau of investigation and the have been written by J. Edgar Hoover, Central Intelligence Agency had something" ' Director of the Federal Bureau of Inver- to do with the Brazilian revolution of April ligation, to Walter Jenkins. 1964. The intricacies of that Communist scheme became further apparent t when we when we The alleged photostatic copy of the determined that my signature has been letter is so scurrilous and putrid that I forged from a letter stolen by Cuban" In do not Intend to put It In the RECORD. Havana in 1060.- I Sent the anonymous letter to Mr. I trust that In making these facts available iloover, for his information and for to you I have satisfied any and all questions fhatever aid and assistance It might be, which the scurrilous anonymous communi- Mr. Hoover wrote me a letter, stating cation you received may. have raised. If not, do not e that he had received the anonymous let- In ooncluolu hesitate slo a. I would call on me like t to again. let with the alleged copy of a letter which to sxpe uay Fetter As sae supposed to have rvHtten a. appreciation to you for. bringing the ess t o atention. as provides another Bait t r to MMRB& t%pprov,6&v"r-mef~ ., Nat-RD"SY001. 49R000400080009-4