ZONING IN DRANESVILLE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00149R000200460001-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
November 11, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 23, 1999
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 9, 1964
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00149R000200460001-2.pdf113.4 KB
Body: 
NQ HERN VIRGI"`T.A SUN. 7 Sanitized - Approved For Release : CIA- JUL .9 1964 STATINTL Zortifag In .Dranesville Editor, Jic SUN: To what extent Ou litical organization assume , re- responsibility of- the caliber and philosophy of candidates it spon- sors for public office, and for their actions subsequent to elcc tion? Does that responsibility ,, come to an end once the work .. of promoting a campaign has been successfully concluded? 0 should it continue? These arc questions which are raised b recent publicity given 'to the pro- nouncements of individual mem- bers of the Fairfax County Boaz of Supervisors. The' board has representative from seven separate districts 'Elected last Fall were 5 Demo- crats,, 1 Republican, and 1 In- dependent. The Independent, Har. 1 riet Bradley, represents Dranes ville District in which both Mc Loan and Great Falls arc 10 cited, ~t e ? CPYRGHT t Li'l If and o- progress the views of a + district his record is a pure one. majority of our citizens. We are He has voted for them all - also pleased that hers has not geed and bad. been a parochial approach; she The Republican is reported to has shown as mzuch concern for acknowledge that Fairfax County the welfare of the entire county. is already overzoned for apart- as for that of her? owl' district. nients but suggests that since, But we now have reason to won- in his view, development will I der what her colleagues have in: not take. place in outlying areas store. for us. during the next five years per- The matter of zoning and, re- hops McLean is appropriate for g been a burning issue in our .! its;. lorsists tart population density has still additional interim overzon- an area community. The Ignored is the statistical. data rrywood zoning dispute was in the "Multiple Family Housing best known, but by no means Study" recently published by the only rallying point for com county which shows that of 1,573 unity sentiment which favors acres already zoned for apart- owth - but along certain lines.nnents in Fairfax County, 273 e desire for relaatively low dcu- acres (14.3 per cent) are in the y, graceful development is . a McLean "Planning District." In ong one, and. it persists. It the high rise category - the most among Domocrats, Ito-? dense use - 154 of the 253 acres teit:her, -The newspapers, however, .' luote one supervisor, a Demo- ?rat, as stating that the better lace for apartmes and other dgh density development is Mc- an, close to the entrance to, I Vashington and next to the riv, r. This view, of course, cell-' " " Year 2000 Plan radicts the , loveloped by the National Cipi- the McLean com-munttj% of 50.6 acres zoned for town or row houses in Fairfax County, 30.9 are in McLean. This certainly is our "fair share" which.' one. su- pervisor has contended'.: we not yet have. Still further, we already have planned and' wider way the larg- est industrial - commercial cone- plex in the .county at Tyson's al Planning Commission and sup-. ! ?C6rner adjacent to still another )orted in principle by our Cowl- substantial existing. commercial y Board. development at the center of Mc- Another Democrat describes Lean. And at Langley we. have is as "vulnerable," and is rc- the C.I.A. building the second x;rted to state that because - ? .- ? ` " ' ? . . 1" She was selected as a caondi date because of her conviction and voting iccord displayed dur ing five years' service on tin County Planning Commission We who helped to elect her' fee Responsible to the public fe what she does. We have note with satisfaction the .fact" tha 'her areas have .been subjected o high density development, 50 how'd McLean:' Interesti ngly .rough, his .district is MYft. Ver-= I ion which shares wills us eo.m non problems and characleris--` cs. r'~o ra:t s a. twelve a 4-616,1 ipred~Ina she has workSattBZf~ the interests of our residents re i ;gtudiess of political _,AgPli*atiO ct+tion placed lmfore hini. Lr our CIA-RDP75-00149R0~ largest or fief. structure in to state of Virginia. We now must ask what course a majority of the board proposes to follow in guiding future growth in cur area. If it is the intention of Democrats, or Republicans for that matter, from other districts to force upon its a changed pat- tern of growth against the wishes of our citizenry, then the partyorganization which put thorn in office should accept a share of the blame.. The selection and election of public officials is serious business. It is not a game which once ration can be forgotten until the next time. The party organization should be willing to be held accountable for the responsiveness of and the record compiled by the people it sponsors for public office, Moreover, the next Dranes- ville District candidate for stt- peivisor sponsored by the same political organization should be expected not to reject what his fellows may have done. He, too, should shoulder a measure of the responsibility. To do less is to adnilt that the party, its power structure, and its political phi- losophy have no sense of Pro- gram or meaning at the local CLIVE L. DUVAL, 2d Chairman DranesviUe Independent ' ? Force 0200460001'-2