NOTICE: In the event of a lapse in funding of the Federal government after 14 March 2025, CIA will be unable to process any public request submissions until the government re-opens.

CASTRO TAKES AWAY THE GUNS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00149R000200320015-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
November 11, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 18, 1999
Sequence Number: 
15
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 1, 1965
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00149R000200320015-2.pdf102.98 KB
Body: 
THE INDEPENDENT Sanitized - Approved For i13 ohmser. QJSTATINTL CPYRGHT untra Takes Away The Guns By Robert Tabor The subject is guns. Fidel Castro is currently disarming the Cuban populace, including militia members not on active duty. Senator Dodd seeks to disarm citizens of the United States, and damn the Constitution. There is a distinct relationship of ideas there, and although I am not unduly concerned by the hysteria implicit in the Dodd Bill, currently be- fore Congress, I am concerned- let us say that I have been close enough to the Cuban Revolution to have reason-about what is happening in Cuba. Time was when Fidel Castro boasted that the common people of his revolu- tionary country were armed. Their rifles were the guarantee of their freedom, the token of his overwhelming popularity. lie walked freely among them. If the people chose to depose a regime grown despotic or for whatever reason unpopular-bang[ off with his head. In the most literal way, Fidel staked his life on his popularity. lie bet his life that he was right. Now the bet is reneged. Why? What has gone wrong? Something, surely, for Castro was correct in the first instance: a. country whose citizens are armed is a free country. Bullets hack up ballots- it is not a question of one or the other. if the ballot box fails, and the courts fail, and the parliament and the popular assembly fail, the rifle is-as Che Gue- 'varn has noted-the court of last resort. The founding fathers of these United States understood the principle very well --they had just finished testing it on,the British -and they wrote it into the U.S. Constitution, Connecticut's Senator Thomas Dodd- sometimes registered agent of the Ydi? gorns tyranny In Guatemala, grand' in- quisitor of the Eastland Committee-is (busily trying to write it out..' "The right of the people to bear arms a bow and arrow. The hysteria abou weapons could easily extend that far. unmotivated murder of Jack Kennedy I only a pretext for outlawing rifles. Th truth is that what Senator Dodd renll really fear, is not presidential assassina- tion, not crimes of passion or insanity or common venality, but armed rebellion- the violent assertion of natural rights by those to whom the ballot box has always been a mockery. I am thinking of the recent Watts in- I surrection in Los Angeles. I am thinking of the black rebellion still to come-and shall not be infringed." I suspect that Dodd is thinking similar The Constitution says nothing of arms thoughts. above a certain caliber, or arms that may In the so-called Watts district, a vast tainea ny mail order. It says "arms," pe- riod. It stands as a natter of common sense that honest men ought to be able to arm themselves in order to protect themselves and their families against lawbreakers- who will obtain weapons whether legally obtainable or no. But that is not the primary purpose of the Constitutional amendment which guarantees the right of the people to bear arms. Its primary purpose was to back up an idea that Thomas Jefferson pro- pounded: the right of the people to resist tyranny by force of arms. It was summed up in a sentence on the Jefferson seal: "Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God." Senator Dodd, like most. reactionaries, fears weapons In the hands of ordinary citizens-and if I were In his shoes I might be terrified, too. To Outlaw Mail Order Weapons (The assassination of President' Kennedy has given impetus to Dodds- legislative which the unemployment rate stands at 30 percent and miser i dail y s y company , I a small corps of Negro snipers, armed with weapons looted from pawnshops, the very symbol of poverty, held an army at bay for six days. Property damage from fires set by bursting Molotov cocktails rose to $200,- 000,000. (But how to outlaw gasoline?) Insurance companies all over the country felt the impact. Shudders were felt in every great city with a sizeable Negro ghetto, and ran up and down Dixieland. Armed Negroes, on the rampage. liorrorsl Personally, I am not inclined, despite the tragic toll of human life in Los An- geles, to count the Watts uprising an un- mitigated evil, It was, in fact, long over- due. The evil lies in the social system that has kept 20 million black people-and not a few million white poor-under the grinding heel of poverty in the world's richest nation. The staccato rattl ifl f fi L I e o r e re n os effort to outlaw mail-order weapons, and Angeles delivered a message. The ballot most other firearms. Kennedy was murd- box, had failed, the Congress had failed, ered with a mail-order rifle. Ergo, mail- the courts had failed, and it was time for order rifles are things of evil. Happily# he a change. I suggest that that is what rifles are for. And at the risk of seeming to incite to riot (which is not my purpose), I would : like to see the Dodd Bill killed. I would like to see it killed because I believe that an armed citizenry inspires CPYRGHT a certain respect in its civil servants which does not obtain where the people are disarmed (e.g., the Soviet Union, China). If the authorities fear an armed citiz. enry, then they, the authorities, need to examine their consciences. Memo to Senator Dodd. i Cuban press please copy. Sanitized - Approve For.ReIease : CIA-RDP75-00149R000200$20015-2