'CAMPAIGN' AID ASKED BY SEN. DODD

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00149R000200300097-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
November 11, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 20, 1999
Sequence Number: 
97
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 23, 1966
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00149R000200300097-4.pdf176.19 KB
Body: 
0 0 Sanitized - Approved Fo G 9 Les: TO r f ] APR 2 3 1966 The Washington 11Xerry-Go-1'{o'11nd 'Camp-m-laign'.Ai By Drew Pearson and Jack Anderson, (r~ 1966. Ae11-McClure syn1tcete. Inc.' Sen. Thomas J. Dodd (D~ Conn.) has now conceded that this column was correct in re- porting that he put in his own pocket the proceeds from a 1961 testimonial dinner and a 1963 "Dodd Day" breakfast- lunch-dinner. He. made this admission in reply to written Interrogatories from the Sen- ate Ethics Committee. He also did not dispute the column's claim that his net take was $54,555.58 from the 1961 dinner and $47,000 from the 1963 affair - a total of more than $100,000. The Senator contended, how- ever, that the money was raised for his personal use, not his political campaign chest. His associates acknowledged to The Washington Post that po- litical funds diverted to his personal use would be taxable, but, Insisted that the contribu- tions to his 1961 and 1963 tes- timonials were personal gifts, therefore tax-free, This becomes an extremely important distinction, s i n c e Dodd neglected to report this income on his tax returns. It will come as a surprise to the dinner guests that they were donating .to Dodd's per- sonal finances rather than to his campaign. For he. told one and all that he was raising the money for. political purposes. He mailed out more than 1500 letters, typed In leis Washing- ton office and stuffed in his Hartford office ,by" Senate. em- Asked by Sen. ployes, soliciting "campaign contributions" for Dodd Day. If they had known the dinners were for his personal benefit, doubtless in view of the na- tional furor over Nixon's $18,- 000 personal expense fund, they would have been hesitant about contributing. , The claim that the two testi- monials were personal, n o t political, should also startle President Johnson, who was persuaded to be the star at- traction at both events for the specific purpose of helping Dodd raise campaign funds. "Dear 'Lyndon," wrote Dodd on Aug.' 5, 1963, "allow me to thank you again for your gen- erous offer to come to Con- 'nectieut to' assist me in my forthcoming campaign. Since receiving definite word from your office. that you will be available on Oct. 26 (Dodd Day) for the entire day, I have scheduled "a variety of activi- ties that will cover the princi- pal. centei