HEINE LOSES CASE AGAINST CIA AGENT

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00001R000400180028-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
November 11, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 22, 1999
Sequence Number: 
28
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 8, 1966
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00001R000400180028-5.pdf99.99 KB
Body: 
DEC 8 1966 Sanitized- Approved-For Release. CIA-RDR7~55 CPYRGHT CPYRGHT CPYRGHT CPYRGHT CPYRGHT trSe the question of the truth or falsity of the charges, because U 1 u non 1.117t accusing a CIA asserted by the United States. Estonia emigre 'leader a Com- which would be presented at Judge l~oszel C. Thomsen is-dilemma which is presented .sued a order summarily dis- now." missing the suit filed two years That dilemma, the judge said, ago by erik Heine, a native fif is whether Raus would be for- facts tif y about 'subuib f Toronto, Canada. 'bidden to tes Heine suit was against Juri' and to call witnesses in order Raus, a Hyattsville engineer for to. prove that what he said the Bur au of Public Roads and about Heine was true. This ,a some me agent of the Central. .inability, he said, might no :Intellig ce Agency. . only make Raus come into The IA has said that Raus court "weaponless before hi adversary," but might den twas an employe of the agency Heine "the opportunity to at and ha been given orders in tempt to vindicate himself f 1964 to spread the word that Heine as a "dispatched Soviet court. " Intellig nee. operative, a KGB The judge said: "Ice way t agent." KGB is the Soviet se- avoid choosing between two evil cret 'po ice agency. s has been suggested or dis Judg Thomson based his dis-!covered." missal of the ,lawsuits on two In upholding Raus' claim tha ground : he has a privilege of immunit He s d that Raus has a,"priv- for his officially ordered state il'ege a ainst liability for defa-: ments against Heine, Judge mation' because he acted-' Thomsen relied on a 1959 Su- "within the scope of his em pronto Court decision in the ployme t by an agency of the case of Barr v. Mat.tco. vullcu ULQ4eJ. 'rho ruling in favor of the 2. T government has a CIA's c "privil e against discovery off tell anylamore~secret Iinformat the secrets of the CIA. . tion about Rails and his actions Thom en's ruling, in effect, 1 ends th lawsuit, unless Heine's was based upon a federal law national lawyer are able to persuade defense designed nsed and d safeguard seccurity urity secrets. s. higher ourt to reverse the rul-, "It is clear that if Raus makes ing. leine s attorneys) have said, further disclosures without thei they w uld appeal if Thomson wouldvn of the agency, he} dismis d their case. They not only violate the sec= have 3 days to file.a formal. recy agreement (that he made, nf appeal with the 4thwith the CIA in 1963), but might! notice ti C irt of Appeals at Rich- violate the statute prohibit in unlawful disclosure of con mond, a. fidential information respect-! Had e judge ruled the other ing the national defense:" way, eine's claims that he The judge said that be "has; was' d amed by Raus would been anxious" to insure that en tried before a jury. Heine "should have the oppor-l "The Same Dilemma ..." itunity to discover whatever tget~ Thomsen, noting that Heine had challenged the truth of the remarks made about him by Raus, said in his opinion today: "A trial,. would not resolve cover and has accorded plaintiff (Heine) that opportun- ity." But the judge made it clear' he felt the CIA had been com- elled to go as far as it should ave been in disclosing data oral affidavits that Raus was role as a Soviet agent because that w necessary to protect "the . tegrity of the agency's) foreign intelligence sources." The gency's.concern about Heine. ppaiently rose in 1963 when 13 'was making a tour of the U fed States and Canada. During his tour, Heine was de-~ scribin what he called his vig ` orous efforts, as an anti-Soviet freedom fighter, and as a result was gaining popularity among the No American community of Est alan emigrants. Boca se of this the agency decide that it had to expose Heine' alleged background as a Comm nisi agent, and chose1 Raus, imself an Estonian im-i migra t, to do the job. In h lawsuit, Heine clamed that o three occasions in 1963; and 19 Raus described him as, a Corn unist and a KGB agent: STATINTL Sanitized Approved For Release : 'CIA-RDP75-00001 R000400180028-5 e me Lases ~,q ? I By'LYLE DENNISTON Star Staff Writer