MUSIC DEBATE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00001R000400010015-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
November 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 26, 2000
Sequence Number: 
15
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00001R000400010015-7.pdf30.81 KB
Body: 
Approved For Rel Lette /" "MUSIC DEBATE ' TO THE EDITOR: May I add a bit to the de- bate stirred by your recent debate on modern niusjc- "Modern Music : 'A Dead Art by Henry Pleasants and "Mod- ern Music : 'Fresh and Dif- ferent' ..by Aaron cople,nd (March 13) ? Mr. Pleasants, in his inter- esting and provocative article, advances the theory that "mod- ern music is performed be- cause performers, recording companies and, to a consider- able extent, serious music audi- ences believe that they owe the composer a hearing." If this is true, then at least one of the artistic inequities of our times is solved. However, I am of the opinion that the opposite is more often true; I think there are many talented composers who .do not receive. a hearing because of the pies- se 2000/05/24: CIA-RDP75-00001 RO cures endemic in the music business. It is to be hoped in t>ze future that all compos- er's W1I1, at leas%, be allowed Further,' the artist, if he aware, acknowledges that his only debt is to the public who pay to see or hear him per- form. If, by chance, the work he performs is by a new and unknown musician, there is great satisfaction to be gleaned from the introduction of a fresh talent to a receptive audience. JAN PEERCE. New Rochelle, N. Y. Approved For Release 2000/05/24: CIA-RDP75-00001 R000400010015-7