WHO ASSASSINATED PRESIDENT KENNEDY?

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP75-00001R000100020095-1
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 1
• Document Creation Date: November 17, 2016
• Document Release Date: June 6, 2000
• Sequence Number: 95
• Publication Date: May 1, 1970
• Content Type: OPEN

,
CPYRGH"V Who Assassinated President Kennedy?
Computers and Automation
Approved For 'Release 2000/06/13XiQlAw~P3"RMfO00100
Part 1. Introduction
11
On November 22, 1963, in Dallas, Texas, President
John F. Kennedy, while riding In an open limousine
through Denley Plaza and waving to the surrounding
crowds, was shot to depth. Lee Harvey Oswald, an
ex-Marine, and former visitor to the Soviet Union,
was arrested that afternoon in a movie theatre in
another section of Dallas; that night he was charged.
with shooting President Kennedy from the sixth floor{
ensternmost window of the Texas School Book Deposi-
tory Building overlooking Dooley Plaza. This act
Oswald denied steadily through two days of question-6
Ing (no record of questions and answers was ever
preserved). Two days later while Oswald was being
transferred from one jail to another, he was shot
by Jack Ruby, a Dallas night-club owner, in the
basement of the Dallas police station, while mil-
lions of Americans watched on television. The corn
Lyndon B. Johnson, and headed by Chief Justice Earl
-V 'r in view of the authority of the Warred Commis-
sion, that conclusion was accepted by many Americaaa?;? ~:
for a long time. But the conclusion cannot be con- 1i.
sidered true by any person who carefully considers
the crucial evidence - such as the physics of Jthe ;
was a conspiracy.
to be true on the basis of substantial, conelusiva"?+
evidence, and in particular some analysis of the
photographic evidence.
There was in fact ? conspiracy. Oswald played
elusive evidence that on November 22, 1963, he did
was a pa..;. A.
.'.~
bly four). - none of whom were in the sixth floor
itory building where the Warren Commission placed
Kennedy.
One of .hese shots missed entirely: one hit
with Kennedy; and four hit President Kennedy, one
bend. (The bulk of the undeniable evidence for
these sf.ntemrnta about the shots consists Of:
pally shown in some 60 frames of the famous film
by Abraham Zapruder; (b) the locations of Inc in'
Juries In Kennedy and in Connally; and (c) more
than 100 pictures# consisting of-more than 30
.still photographs and more than 70 frames of mo-
vies.)
?-- persons included members of the Dallas police force
(but not all of the Dallas police - and that so
exiles, some all
very highly I'll
potrators of t:~
Orwell's famou
Of course,
neither true :;
,.,As to believe'
It the United St
investigatio' -,]
Clay Show we
though he pr
The news met
newspapers I
such a way
The media I
opinion, if
poll percen
Note from t o Pub Caner: Zn o er to include the
ortfota bU I?fchard S. Sprague in this issue of Com-
utnrn and Automntionp it, in nooonoari to ty e l
art o a n the tl/pefaan of our'"Aoroao the Ldttorto
Dank" snot{on, rather than the uauat typofaoo oN
our ar~p~I+bveKyR'+b~!~I~J(~+~A8~P1!O~Ih ~!'. ~~P17~
~rrong again in this case. For example,, the?pre.. CPY
lieve for five years (1903 to 1900) that the wrignt
brothers had flown in a flying machine heavier than
air. Only after the Wright brothers had won spec-
tacular air races and demonstrated other successful
flights in France, did the majority of the "hard-
headed" American press believe that the Wright broth-
ers had flown!
But the evidence cited or referred to in this
articli, and the existing photographic evidence and
its analysis, a little of which is published here.
establishes the fact of conspiracy. This evidence
along With other evidence should and can initialize
a major change in the beliefs of the people of the
United States. As for beliefs of the people of
Europe, it has long been and still is accepted thole
that President John F. Kennedy was assassinated by
a conspiracy.
What Is the Evidence?
The evidence for the statement - "the Warren
Commission conclusions are false" - Is now over-
whelming.
There now exists not only a mountain of new evi-
dence, but also considerable new analysis of the
old evidence, the evidence which the Commission it-
self published in the 26 volumes of Evidence and
Hearings accompanying the Warren Report. Much of
the new evidence and the new analyses of the old
evide ce are available for any serious researcher's
inspeItion; if any such person is Interested, he
should write me.
There are four prime sources of new evidence and
s..lyiiat - _
affiliated with the National Committee to
"' ,.~ppaed even from conspirators -
=000Q'JR00~0i'iii tisioas and confessions.