CIA ON CIA

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00001R000100020053-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
November 17, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 6, 2000
Sequence Number: 
53
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 1, 1971
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00001R000100020053-7.pdf77.11 KB
Body: 
FOIAb3b Approved For Release 21t' i &a r'L : CIA RDP75-00 Q~~~ CPYRGHT CP CXI. IL [.,i 1 tir. 1 .G YRGHTarn the head of the silent service and canno,' advertise my wares." - Allen Dulles, 957. ractices. Such small ad hoc bodies cannot possibly ope with the multi-agencies, their billions of dollars, and their hundreds of thousands of people; in sum, the "Intelligence community." The core question, as with the FBI, is an old one: who guards the guardians? FOIAb3b The American Society of Newspaper Editors was' flattered that theirs was the forum chosen by Mr. Richard Helms, director .of Cenral Intelligence and concurrently director of the Central Intelligence Agency, for his first public speech in io years. "The quality of foreign intelligence available to the United ,States, in .117.1," he told the editors in a self-serving assessment, "is better than it has ever been before." It would have been interesting had Mr. Helms at- tempted a correlation between value and volume. Benjamin Welles in The New York Times Sunday Magazine (April.13, 1971) breaks down the daily mountain of intelligence information as "50 percent from overt sources such as periodicals, 35 percent from electronics (satellites and radio], and the remaining 15 percent from agents. How important is the 15 percent? !vrr. Helms noted the "growing criticism" of CIA, but he avoided any discussion of its cause. The "intel- ligence" function of the agency is not what has pro- voked all the controversy. Criticism has centered not on "spying," but on' CIA's political action abroad- the.suborniitg of political leaders, labor union officials, journals is and anyone else who. students scholars , , can be bought. CIA has been criticized for straying from information gathering onto the path of manipula- tion of foundations and such organizations as the National Student Association or Radio Free Europe, or the AFL-CIO. Through liaison with foreign police and security services, the CIA tries to keep track of foreign "subversives," frequently defined as those who want to depose the government in power. Each report it manages to secure from its clandestine sources has a price in terms of closer alliance with one reactionary regime after another-as in Greece and numerous countries in Asia and Latin America. The complicity is no secret to the host government, or to the Com- munists, only.to the American taxpayer. Mr. Helms' point that "CIA is not and cannot be its own master" is the most difficult to accept, even from the honorable man that Mr. Helms unquestion-, ably.is. To be sure, there is a review system, but it is more shadotiv than substance. The President's foreign intelligence- advisory board, which is supposed to analyze a $4 billion Intelligence program, is char- acterized by inattention, fatigue and a charming lack of expertise. There is only the most cursory inspection and oversight of CIA by "elements of the Appropria- tions and Armed Services Committees," which from timeto` time raise their hands in benediction over, any Intelligence presentation. The average congressional "watchdog" is Iona, in the tooth, and prefers not to rece1Apjan2*e l F,iewifteleas ~tiMonm6m fid3f -RDP75-00001 R0001 00020053-7 fessing in advance lack of training in sound security