FUNDING REQUEST FOR THE CONCEPT FORMULATION PHASE OF AN ADVANCED AERODYNAMICS RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEM UNDER THE FY-69 GENERAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (AIRCRAFT) BUDGET

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP74B00283R000100130002-8
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 17
• Document Creation Date: December 19, 2016
• Document Release Date: September 20, 2006
• Sequence Number: 2
• Publication Date: November 6, 1968
• Content Type: MF

Approved For Release 2006/09/20: CIA=RDP74B00283R000100130002-809 5 D
SECRET IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Copy of
6 November 1968 25X1
MEMORANDUM FOR: Comptroller, OSA
SUBJECT Funding Request for the Concept Formulation
Phase of an Advanced Aerodynamics Reconnaissance
25X1 System under the FY-69 General Research and
Development (Aircraft) Budget
REFERENCE : (a) FY-1969 Budget
e . vs. Auvanced Aircraft
25X1
1. This memorand quest for authorization
for the expenditure of to pursue the Concept
Formulation Phase of a Aerodynamic Reconnaissance
System. This is a new FY-69 effort and is appropriate to
the General Research and Development (Aircraft) program.
!? 2. The program, as discussed in detail in Attachment Is
is. to explore various methods of achieving a survivable
-quick reaction reconnaissance capability (manned or unmanned).
The primary objective would be to survive in the lethal
envelopes of projected Sovbloc and other defensive environ-
ments through. the 1975 - 1980 period. In formulation of an
approach to this program, attention is directed to'reference
(a) wherein it is pointed out that the decision to phase-out
the OXCART vehicle and the decision to discontinue work on
the ISINGLASS concept represented a trend away from continuing
maintenance of a high-performance.covert manned overflight
capability in the NRP. Reference (a) further notes that
the cost and effectiveness of alternative vehicle concepts
must be examined; for example, should the vehicle be manned
or unmanned and in each case what type of launch operation,
propulsion, recovery, etc. offers the most promise. These
questions are, addressed in the elements of the task.
NRO review(s) completed.
SECRET
Approved For Release 2006/09/20: C1A-RDP74B00283R00
 9 ASD/R&D/OSA(Chrono)
10 - RS/OSA
25X1
SECRET
Aooroved For Release 2006/09/20: CIA-RDP74B002 Rf flfl11101if10f12-S
Approved For Release 2006/09/20: CIA-R DP74B00283R0001.00130002-8
program.
3. It is requested that funds in the amount of
be allocated to CIA, for use in FY-69, for the concept
formulation phase of an Advanced Aerodynamic Reconnaissance
System, under the General Research and Development -(Aircraft)25x1
Dep ty for
Research and Development
Special Activities
Attachment:
As stated
ASD/R&D/OSA anw/5 Nov 1968
Distribution:
Copy 1 -. COMPT/OSA
2 - B&F/COMPT/O3
3 - DD/SA
4 - D/R&D/OSA
5 - D/M/OSA
6 - D/O/OSA
7 - CMD/COMPT/OSA
8.- ASD/R&D/OSA
 Approved For Release 2006/09/20: CIA-RDP74B00283R000100130002-8
SECRET
25X1
PROGRAM' DESCRIPTION 25X1
TITLE Concept Formulation Phase of an Advanced
Aerodynamic Reconnaissance System
REFERENCE dtd 5 Sept 1967, "Funding
Request or Certain FY-68 General R&D
(Aircraft) Activities"
To explore various methods of achieving
a survivable quick-reaction reconnaissance
capability. Primary objective would be
to survive in the lethal envelopes of
projected Sovbloc and other defensive
environments through the 1975 - 1980 period.
Elements of the task encompass items
3 and 4 of the referenced memorandum.
In anticipation of approval for this
study, the Office of Scientific Intelligence
(OSI) was requested to-provide their
most realistic estimate of the Soviet
Bloc and the non-Soviet'Bloc defensive
environments for the 1975 - 1980 period.
A summary of the results of the OSI effort
are presented in Exhibit (A). These
results in Exhibit (A) together with the
quick reaction capability as stipulated
by USIB for the indications satellite,
Exhibit (B), are used to establish an
approach to the problem.
IV. APPROACH TO THE PROBLEM
G?.r,? ~,
Survivability would be considered as
two distinct environments, i.e., Soviet
.Bloc and non-Soviet Bloc. Exhibit (C)
identifies how each of these two en-
?..vironments would be investigated. Since
a "wait and see" approach is recommended
for the non-Soviet Bloc environment, the
effort for FY-69 reduces to concentrating
only on'the Soviet Bloc task. This task
. Approved For Release 2006/09/20: CIA-RDP74B00283R000100130002-8
 Approved For Release 2.006/09/20: CIA-RDP74B00283R000100130002-8
SECRET
Attachment I to
Page
would'be performed in sequence by a
"Think Group" and then an Airframe
contractor. The proposed program
organization and elements of the task
are shown in Exhibits (D) and W.
.The elements of the task would encompass
.the specifics as outlined in Exhibit (F).
Further amplification of this exhibit is
noted below:
a. Profiles and Tactics - Using the
SA-5 (Tallinn System) as the limiting
minimum envelope, investigate maximum
capable concepts. Implicit in the
.development of these concepts will be'
the realization that future defensive
systems expected 10 years hence can only
be postulated. Therefore, the sensitivity
of survival to variation in defensive
system performance parameters must be
considered. All conceivable and
potentially feasible vehicle profiles and.
tactics~would.be considered for survi-
vability. No technological constraints
would be imposed on either altitude or
speed. Also realistic maneuvers, as they
effect the engagement geometry between
the SAM and the vehicle, would be evaluated.
b. Candidate Concept Survey - Based on
using viable profiles and tactics developed
..above, this survey should ideally result
in one or more concepts. This segment
would be the sole responsibility of the
airframe contractor under Headquarters
direction.
. Flight Modes - All modes would be
examined to determine if one or more 25X1
'emerges as a superior approach. The
launch phase would include investigating
SECRET .
Approved For Release 2006/09/20: CIA-RDP74B00283R000100130002-8
 Approved For Release 2006/09/20: CIA-RDP74B00283R000100130002-8
I
Page 3 25X1
vehicles which are air launched, ground
launched, boosted or self-accelerators.
The significant, i.e., intelligence
gathering phase, would consider but not
be restricted to glide, powered,
throttling techniques, high-altitude, low
altitude and combinations thereof and
speeds to encompass from hypersonic to
sub-sonic in consonance with the profiles
and tactics.
Technology - The contractor would avail
himself of the latest materials, manu-
facturing and engineering technology. All
of the technology derived from previous
programs would be considered so as not to
.:"replow old ground." The most futuristic
NASA data would be considered for appli-
cability.
Operational Considerations - The case
of manned vs. unmanned would be considered
in depth with all compromises both from
the vehicle design standpoint and from
the cost and reliability standpoint being
weighed. The type of launch and the
basing facilities would be reviewed as.
they effect the design capability.
Considerations necessary to maintain a
covert program would be addressed.
c. Analysis - A determination/
assessment o F ow well. each concept meets
the problem would result from this phase
of the task.
Force Fit - It is highly unlikely that
any one design would prove superior in
all aspects and certain weight would have
tole given to the various aspects of the
problem during the analysis.
25X1
SECRET
Approved For Release 2006/09/20: CIA-RDP74B00283R0D0100130002-8
 Reaction - Any intelligence collection
system is useful only if the data are
available to the users on a "soonest"
basis. Therefore, the quick-reaction
ability of the.concepts would be given
prime consideration. Both the reaction
time for the actual collection of the
data and also the subsequent steps
necessary for processing, etc., would be
a part of the study.
Man Value -Since politically an
.unmanned vehicle would be much more
palatable', the presence of a man must
prove to be of extreme value from the
reliability and mission success standpoint
if selected'. Perhaps the man might be
present only during the test phase with
.the vehicle being droned operationally.
Cost - Naturally any large expenditure
of funds committed for intelligence
collection can only be justified if (a)
a requirement for the intelligence exists,
(b) the concept has 'a high chance of
success of obtaining the data and (c) a
more reliable, less costly, more politically
acceptable approach doesn't exist. There-
fore, in the analysis, it is envisioned
that both the Airframe Contractor and
,Headquarters would have an input.
reaction were potentially feasible and
practically achievable, would consideration
be given to a follow-on effort to include
confirmation of system designs and the
investigation of basic technology in certain
critical areas.
d. Answer - This phase of the task
would represent the end result of the
effort. Only if the results clearly in-
,.1dicated that both survivability and quick
with the criteria of Exhibit (G). A cost and schedule ? 25X1
estimate is presented'in Exhibit (H).
Approved For Release 200Ei/Clg1?fl ? C;IA-RnP74R(1[1gsiRflfl(l1(}fl1 iooog-s
Approved For Release 2006/09/20: CIA-RDP74B00283R000100130002-8
Attachment I to
Pa 25X1
 .Approved ?For\Release 2006/09/20: CIA-RDP74B00283R000100130002-8
S O CT
Projected Defensive Capabilities Through 1975-1980 Period
Soviet Bloc
(A) Barrier Defense and Point Defense of High Priority Targets
SA-5 (Tallinn System) - 130,000 feet altitude at Mach 7.0
(B) ABM defenses against ICBM and SLBM threats to principal
urban-industrial concentrations .
(C) Merging of the two defenses will provide capability 'of coping with targets
at all . regimes of aerodynamic operation.
(D) Capability for either nuclear - or non-nuclear warhead
SECRET
EXHIBIT (A)
!,
 DEFINITION ' OF QUICK REACTION
TWENTY-FIVE HOUR ELAPSED TIME INCREMENT FROM
OFFICIAL REQUEST FOR RECONNAISSANCE COVERAGE TO
RECEIPT OF PROCESSED PRODUCT BY INTERPRETERS.
S RET
SECRET
Annrnvpd Fnr Release 2006109120 'CIA-RDP74B00283R000100130002-8
ase=. 2006. /09/20': CIA-RDP7. B00283R000100130002-8
 Approv6d For Release 20.00109120 : CIA-RDP74B00283R000 t0130002-8.
SECRET
PROJECTED RECONNAISSANCE 'SYSTEMS
SOVIET BLOC
USING SA-5 (TALLINN SYSTEM) AS LIMITING MINIMUM ENVELOPE,
INVESTIGATE MAXIMUM CAPABLE CONCEPT WITHIN 1975-80 PROJECTED
STATE-OF-THE-ART.
REQUEST INDEPENDENT CONCURRENT HIGH PRIORITY COLLECTION .EFFORT
AGAINST SA-5 AND ABM SYSTEMS. TO HARDEN- INTELLIGENCE
NON-SOVIET BLOC
FOLLOW TAGBOARD PROGRESS FOR ONE YEAR
IF SATISFACTORY, INVESTIGATE MODS TO TAGBOARD TO IMPROVE
ALTITUDE.
IF ' UNSATI SFACTORY, INVESTIGATE MODS TO A-I21SR-71 FAMILY
TO IMPROVE ALTITUDE.
b D7A Pflfl ,~Qnnn1 nn?i!znnn7-P
EXHIBIT (C)
 App.ro ed .or".Rel
e?2006i09/20: DP7'4B00283'R0001001300022-8'
PROGRAM ORGANIZATA FOR SOVIET-BLOC STUDY
THINK GROUP - Based on reconnaissance targets and ground rules, identify
PROFILES AND TACTICS. Options to be rated in order of
preference.
HEADQUARTERS - PROFILES AND TACTICS to be selected based on think group
data plus in-house assessment
compatible with PROFILES AND TACTICS.
AIRFRAME MANUFACTURER Technological survey of all potential CANDIDATE CONCEPTS
? HEADQUARTERS -7 Review and final judgement. : ? .
ANALYSIS of concepts to provide rating in order of
preference with supporting data.
EXHIBIT c?
 _: Approved Four Release 2006/09
EQiL 74BOO283RO001001.30002-a:
ELEMENTS OF THE TA S K
L PROFILES AND TACTICS - THINK GROUP
2. CANDIDATE CONCEPT SURVEY - AIRFRAME MANUFACTURER
3. ANALYSIS - AIRFRAME MANUFACTURER/HEADQUARTERS
A. ANSWER - AIRFRAME MANUFACTURERIHEADQUARTERS
SECRET
Irr DoIonco Onnnrna?n ? li?_ anp7dR0n9R3Rn0010013000 -8
EXHIBIT (E)(-
 .Approve..d Fo
eiease.2oo6/O.9i20S ?iCR E r4BOO283ROOO1.ao-13ooo2-s.:.
PROFILES AND TACTICS
LOW TO HIGH ALTITUDES
.SUBSONIC TO HYPERSONIC SPEEDS
MANEUVERABILITY
SECRET
n a C-, M-1-0 nn _mnrnn . nin onn-7 nonnnooonnn~nn ~onnnn o
EXHIBIT (Ffl
 -..Approved -Foi Release :2.006A09/20?: CIA-RDP74B00283R0
CCi% DCT
CANDIDATE CONCEPT SURVEY
q~;~o~a2=8. :
FLIGHT MODES - AIR LAUNCHED VS. GROUND LAUNCHED
BOOSTED VS. SELF-ACCELERATION
GLIDE, POWERED, THROTTLING TECHNIQUES
TECHNOLOGY - OXCART
ISINGLASS
OPERATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS - MANNED VS. UNMANNED
TYPE OF LAUNCH
-BASING FACILITIES
= COVERT OPERATION
SENSOR CONSIDERATIONS - BROAD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WEIGHT AND
VOLUME ALLOTMENT
SECRET
nirarl Pnr Rala~cc ~nnntnat~n (,IA-Rf1P74Rnn7R-iRnnn1nni3nnn2-8
EXHIBIT (F)
 ANALYSIS
)O10013d00 -8.
17
FORCE FIT CANDIDATE CONFIGURATIONS RELATIVE TO WEIGHTING OF
VARIOUS ASPECTS OF PROBLEM
REACTION - TIME FOR COLLECTION OF DATA
TIME FOR PROCESSING AND DELIVERY TO INTERPRETER
MAN VALUE - IMPACT ON RELIABILITY AND MISSION SUCCESS
POLITICAL CONSIDERATIONS
CONSIDER MAN ONLY DURING TEST PHASE
COST JUSTIFIED ONLY IF:
A. REQUIREMENT EXISTS
B. ACCEPTABLE PROBABILITY OF SUCCESS
C. NO MORE RELIABLE, LESS COSTLY, MORE POLITICALLY
ACCEPTABLE APPROACH 0
,SECRET
onnn.i nn onnn
 Approved !For'Rel as:e~2006/09/20 ~:- C1A=RD 74B00283R0O0.'fi0Q1300,02.8.
C. IF BOTH .A AND B POSSIBLE, DEVELOP PLAN
SECRET
? r -
4. ANSWER
A. SURVIVABILITY POSSIBLE?
B. QUICK REACTION POSSIBLE?
 Approved-For .Release 2006109120SECI T4B00283R0001001300.02-8
IV. CONTRACTOR CANDIDATES
CRITERIA FOR SELECTION
THINK GROUP
AERODYNAMIC TYPE VEHICLE EXPERIENCE
_ VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS EXPERIENCE
TACTI CSIENGAGEMENT ANALYSIS EXPERIENCE
LOCATION OF FACILITY
SECURITY CLEARANCE CONSIDERATIONS
COST
TIME
AIRFRAME/SYSTEMS
DEPENDENT UPON RESULTS OF THINK GROUP EFFORT.
SPECIFIC FLIGHT REGIME EXPERIENCE
HARDWARE VS. DESIGN STUDY
PROGRAM SUCCESSES
PREVIOUS RECONNAISSANCE VEHICLE EXPERIENCE
PREVIOUS AGENCY AFFILIATION.
SECRET
EXHIBIT (G) -
 Approved:For'?Release:2tJ(16t09120. C7P,=RD I4k)0fl 83R00a10013O00*-8."
TT c0cTA 6Cb SCHEDULE
$50,000.
THINK GROUP.
AIRFRAME
.CONTRACTOR
? fY 69
. $450,000
_L
-Y70'
JULIAUGISCE'I
DEC J!-1NIFEGIMAf:JAPf:IMAY JUN
EXHIBIT (H). :!_ 1 J