(UNTITLED)
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP74-00005R000200150006-1
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
K
Document Page Count:
8
Document Creation Date:
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date:
December 14, 2006
Sequence Number:
6
Case Number:
Publication Date:
September 26, 1967
Content Type:
MF
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
CIA-RDP74-00005R000200150006-1.pdf | 472.98 KB |
Body:
Approved For Release 2006/12/16: CIA-RDP74-00005R000200150006-1
26 Sept 67
MEMORANDUM FOR:
L'C) 1 i .:. x 3 lf3
This is h '-_ to n" ro Hod grid;
S"'f.i-..'t P ? of forts pI 3. .oi-a1p .,]: son
wit': t 4 s ani FAA manuals ~7 t
~Lrl 1.t 1: at PTA' s that the
~+T
p
still tai'' '' . i f nor :e data a I"1F"'I'"7s aT'_1:
letters ?,ta r?o ,e 1:: 71t .otter to degree
0l, have 13e' -,-? r a -?r .'lr'r : !r l rnen their ch r'terss .
State says T Tai?` A nr't ':, are the sa l as t}fee s
sro. So : ctwaalTy the mid coiii . nt; tx is cm'
covers . or our or versions plus those of 6
other govi t agencies.
(DATE)
FORM NQ. IOI REPLACES FORM 10.101
1 AUG 54 WHICH MAY BE USED.
Approved For Release 2006112/16: CIA-RDP74-00005R000200150006-1
pproved For Release 2006/12/16: CIA-R DP7410005R0002001500061
STAT
TITLE &
AUTHOR & DATE
Forms of
Address
Reports,
Minutes,
Agendas
TS
Correspond.
DCI matter
as part of
handbook
Data on new
US Gov't
letter
YES, plus
exhibit.
Part III
Yes, not in
supplement as
Part V with
6 exhibits.
Yes, plus an
exhibit on
same
NO, except
in early
draft
YES, no
exhibit shown
YES though
not as a
distinct paft
or chapter
Letters
kept separat
from memos
mailing let-
ters and
memos separa
Terms used:
"DCI" and
"memoranda"
Use of
Optional
Form 10
Registered
Mail and
Agency Mail
Examples
made distin
from text
Yes, separate
"Parts" on
each/not merg
Yes, again th
two are not
merged.
YES in Chp. 3, YES as Part V
Section C
NO, except Part
X on approval of
R&D projects
YES, but no NO
example given
Chapter IV
Yes as Chp. 5, YES as Part III
only 1 exhibit. but references
to COMMO
To a degree as YES but with
Chp 2 on memo & reference to
Chp 3 on letter, =MIO
but general procd
for both are mer ed
No, all merged YES but with
in Chp 6 on gen- reference to
eral correspond. C6MMO
"DCI" used but
"memoranda" is
re])laced by "ums
Yes to both
terms throughout
the handbook
No, terms use
were "Directo:
& "memorandum
No, that form
has been drop'
from the book
Yes, after OK
from mailroom
people as Part
IX
Examples are
Yes. Standard Yes, with refere
d Form No. 64 for :: to COMMO; NO to
memo was also us''d Form 1954
at this timgNO
to Form 19-54.
Yes, but merged YES, as Part IX
into text.
Some Exhibits Some exhibits
are distinct, are distinct, bu
but most placed examples are in
in text. text style.
pproved For Release 2
6/12/16: CIA-RDP74-
Yes, to a
degree as Chp 1
on Letters and
Chp 2 on memo
but has gen/procd
Again, tho separt.
gen. procedures
cover both at the
same time.
Yes. "DCI" used;
No as "memor/duets
is used.
e YES. But Form
1954 was not used
for MEMO FOR
RECORD.
YES, in text and
as "e" of Section
IV
Some distinct,
most are placed i
text.
TITLE &
_UT1 IU R & IDAT
Forms of
.ld(lros:
Reports,
Minutes,
Agendas
TS
Correspond.
DCI matter
as part of
handbook
Data on new
US Gov't
letter
Letters
kept soparat
from memos
Y-?S, plus
exhibit.
Part III
Yes, not in
suplklement as
Part V with
6 exhibits.
Yes, plus an
exhibit on
same
Yes, separate
"'Parts" on
each/not merg
mailing let- Yes, again th
tees and two are not
memos separa a merged.
Terms used: No, terms user
"DCI" and were "Directo
"memoranda" & "memorandum
NO, only Chp. 4
on telegrams is
unique.
NO--have dropped
memos in favor o
infc"?mal letters
and communicatio
with few excepti
See above; also
refer to its
Chps 3 on mail
and telegrams.
NO-have dropped
d it and most memo
forms in favor o
informal letter
Recristered ! Apymwe~twR l 4e 2( 1 2!'1 : .C)P
GSA 1967 Draft
YES, Chapter'5.
Plus style
practices.
STATE, March
1966
YES, Part V.,
Chapter 1; all o
Part V extensive
YES, but spread
throughout book
including a few
exhibits, esp.
Chp 6/Part . I.
NO, though its
Part II deals
with comparable
correspondence.
YES, have adopt
it.
Yes in this
March, 1966
version.
FAA, October,
1962
STAT
YES, Chapter 5.
Plus style prac
tices.
NO, only Chaptc
3 or. telegramsr`
wire services i
unique.
NO, though par-
of Chps. 1&2
refer to their
Administrqbor.
YES, have adop
it.
YES, of. Chps.
1 and 2
YES, see Chps.
1-4.
FAA uses "ism"
not memoranda
No but have a
FAA form 2800
which is simi:
I Approved For Rejease 2006/12/16: CIA-RFP74-00005R00020015 }006-1
2 gister^d Yes, after 0;'
P,ail~ -lnd from mailroom
, coney zi?. people as Part
IX
NO as it is
government wide.
YES, esp. ace j YES, esp. Chps.
Chps. 4-7 of
Part I
3 and 4.
x rnples i,,xamples are
m?tde 3 i:3tin
from text
YES to a large
degree; word,
EXAMPLE is all
caps or exhibits;
is bordered by
bold face lines.
NO, most are YES either they
in text/same are separate or
style print; in bold face.
few are separat
Approved For Release 2006/12/16: CIA-RDP74-00005R000200150006-1
TITL; S.
AUTHOR & I WT :
Forms o
drlrec;;;
Reports,
Minutes,
Agendas
TS
CorresDond.
DCI matter
as part of
handbook
Data on new
US Gov't
letter
Letters
kept separat
from memo -:
mailing let-
ters and
memos separa
Terms use,".:
"DCI" and
"memoranda"
Use of
Optional
Form 10
Registered
Mail and
.,gency a
Examples
made ((3istin
from text
Approved For Release 006/12/16: CIA-RDP74 0005R000200150006-
Y-~,5, plus
exhibit.
Part ITT
Yes, not in
sup&lement as
Part V with
6 exhibits.
Yes, plus an
exhibit on
same
Yes, separate
"Parts" on
each/not merg
Yes, again th
two are not
merged.
No, terms use(
were "Director
"memorandum,
No, that form
has been drop
from the book
Yes, after O,
from mailroom
people as Part
IX
Examples are
Some exhibits
are distinct, but
examples are in
text style.
STAT
NO, except
in early
draft
YES, no
exhibit shown
7ES though
not as a
distinct paft
or chapter
Yes, to a
degree as Chp 1
on Letters and
Chp 2 on memo
but has gen/procd
Again, the separt.
gen. procedures
cover both at the
sag time.
Ye'. "DCI" used;
No i.s "memor/dams
is used.
e YES. But Form
1954 was not used
for MEMO FOR
RECORD.
YES, in text and
as "e" of Section
IV
Some distinct,
most are placed ir,
text.
Approved For Releas 2006/12/16: CIA-RDP-i4-00005ROOO2O015000611
YES in Chp. 3,
Seotion C
Na, except Part
X on approval. of
Red) projects
YES, but no NO
example given
Chapter IV
Yes as Chp. 5, YES as, Part ITT
only 1 exhibit, but references
to COMMO
To a degree as YES but with
Chp 2 on memo & reference to
Chp 3 on letter, C0?1IIU
but general proc d
for both are mer ed
No, all merged YES but with
in Chp 6 on gen- reference to
eral correspond. CO?3110
"DCI" used but
"memoranda" is
reblaced by "ums'
Yes. 'standard
d Form No, 64 for
memo was also us
at this timgNO
to Form 1954
i
Yes, but merged
into text.
Yes to both
terms throughout
the handbook
Yes, with referen
to COMMO; NO to
d Form 1954
YES, as Part IX
Some Exhibits
are distinct,
but most placed
in text.
. Approved For Release 2006/12/16: CIA-RD
TITL,' &
UT1101R & D A'1
Forms of
ddres:;
Reports,
Minutes,
Agendas
Ts,
Correspond.
Y-13, plus
exhibit.
Part III
DCI matter Yes, not in
as part of supplement as
handbook Part V with
6 exhibits.
Data on new Y1 s, plus an
US Gov't exhibit on
letter same
Letters
kept separat
from memos
Yes, separate
"Parts" on
each/not merg
mailing let- Yes, again th
ters and two are not
memos separa a merged.
Terms used! No, terms use(
"DCI" and were "Directo
"memoranda" & "memorandum
Use of
Optional
Form 10
110, that form
has been drop
from the book
GSA 1967 Draft
YES, Chapter
Plus style
practices.
NO--have dropped
memos in favor o
informal letters
and communicatio
with few excepti
See above; also
refer to its
Chps 3 on mail
and telegrams.
No to DCI and
GSA used "um"
not memoranda
NO-have dropped
d it and most memo
forms in favor o
informal letter
RArri.st~reci I ApV tec 3R(7 je 2d A2/1 : bA;RD
4-00005R000200150046-1
STATE, March
1966
YES, Part V.,
Chapter 1; all o
Part V extensive
Yes in this
March, 1966
version.
YES, extensive; NO, only Chapte
all of Part III 3 on telegrams&
YES, but spread
throughout book
including a few
exhibits, esp.
Chp 6/Part I.
NO, though its
Part II deals
with comparable'
correspondence.,
STAT
FAA, October,
1962
YES, Chapter 5.
Plus style prac
tices.
wire services i
unique.
NO, though part
of Chps. 1&2
refer to their
Administrator.
YES, have adopt YES, have adopi
it. it.
YES, of. Chps.
192 of Part I.
YES, see its
Chps. 3-7 of
Part I
State uses t9um" B
not memoranda
YD'S, of. Chps.
1 and 2
YES, see Chps.
1-4.
FAA uses "rum"
not memoranda
No but have a
FAA form 2800
which 's simil
t 3R6j6Z00~800 6-1 YE5. esp. ChpE
y,
1te[ i;`tere 1
Xency 'aid
Approved For Rel
Yes, after 01;
from mailroom
people as Part
Ix
se 2006/12/16: CIA-RD
NO as it is
YES, esp. ace
1li3, G"?. -..r-
government wide.
Chps. 4-7 of
Part I
3 and 4.
YES to a large
degree; word,
EXAMPLE is all
caps or exhibits,
is bordered by
bold face lines.
13:arnples examples are
m?Lde distinc
from text
NO, most are YES either they
in text/same are separate or
style print; in bold face.
few are separat
Approved For Release 2006/12/16: CIA-RD174-00005R000200150 J6-1
Approved For Release 2006/12/16: CIA-RDP74-00005R000200150006-1
Forms of
:.dclre:,s
DIA Manual 10-1
4 April 1966
YES) in Part XII
extensive as it
has military
forms too.
Reports,
i iinutes,
Agendas
TS
Correspond.
DCI matter
as part of
handbook
Data on new
US Gov't
letter
Letters
kept separat
from memos
mailing let-
ters and
memos separa
Terms used:
"DCI" and
"memoranda"
Use of
.Optional
Form 10
Registered
Mail and
Agency IMIail
Erxunples
made distin
from text
YTS, plus
exhibit.
Part III
Yes, not in
sup lement as
Part V with
6 exhibits,
Yes, plus an
exhibit on
same
Yes, separate
"Parts" on
each/not merg
Yes, again th
two are not
merged.
No, terms use(
were "Director
& "memorandwa:
No, that form
has been drop-
from the book
Yes, after ON
from mailroom
people as Part
Ix
Examples are
to be done in
4 point,
Sans Serif typ
plus, sepa,'ate
exhibits-"_..b
YES, Parts VI
and VII on Staff
'summary "sheet &
__.misa.__.reports ~._
YES, tho no par-
ticular part is
devoted to it;
security is note
in 5 of the part;
Part VIII deals
with comparable
data and other
special corresp.
Yes, have adopte
it;in Part X on
Sample formats,
many examples of
this
YESParts I&ITI
on letters with
Part IV on memo-
randums
Assembly the sam
for both & their
Services Divisio:
prepares require,
envelopes for bo?
NO, use Director
and memorandum
Yes, Part X,
figures 13,16, 1
20-24 are on Op
Form 10.'
.cf. Services Div
No to large dergre
except Part X does
include all of its
sample format in
one-place.
OSx, Sept. 1963
No, use the
memorandums to
large degree
YES throughout
the book and esp.
in Part III
YES but much is
handled centrall
thru D C&R
YES oh DCI and
YES on memo/de
in some cases,
but generally
memorandum.
NO not even in
exhibits.
DC& appamently
handles most of
their materials
Text is almost
one memorandum
or letter after
another.
OL Notes STAT
NOT in notes
examined
NO, not in notes
examined
Yes, examples
11-14 plus refer-
ences to D/L's
preferences
No, all taught in
Part II,D under
gen. Principles.
tho examples of
same are separate.
not in noted
examined
YES to both
DCI and
memoranda terms
No, only in
correspondence
that stays inside
OL_ used in its
divisions if desirf
not in notes
examined
No, the formats
for memorandums
and letters are
distinct from
- text.
Approved For Release 2006/12/16: CIA-RDP74-000058000200150006-1