MACMILLAN, SANDYS BACKED CIA'S ANTI-JAGAN PLOT

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP73-00475R000401410001-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 27, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 20, 2013
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 23, 1967
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP73-00475R000401410001-7.pdf96.94 KB
Body: 
Declassified in Part-Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 9 oiys roaca.eff-1 50-Yr 2013/12/20 : CIA-RDP73-00475R000401410001-7 7 AT 7r-N A 9 S 6.,iLUL Li continues the Guiana subversion controversy (Letters, page 12). \ jaFan- Talot .4. AMERICA'S Central Intelligence y Agency (the CIA) was working under an agreement with the British Government when it sub- verted the Jagan government in British Guiana in 1963. A senior British security officer disclosed this to the Sunday Times this week. He said the understanding was reached under the Premiership of Harold IVIaemillan. Colonial Secretary Duncan Sandys, and the head and of British security. Other Cabinet Ministers were not told of the decision. And probably the secret papers were. not shown to Harold Wilson on his election in 1964. Last week, Insight reported that the CIA, operating under the " front" of an international trade union office, dealt a mortal blow tol/Cheddi Jagan's leftist govern- ment by financing a 79-day general strike against it. Control of the colony, now the independ- ent Commonwealth nation of Gir;ana, passed to the moderate socialist Forbes Burnham, to the right of Jagan. Last Tuesday, Mr Harold Wilson, questioned in the House of Commons by Labour M Ps, said: " You had better ask the Opposition front' bench." On Wednesday, the trade-union. organisation which was used as a front, the Public Service Inter- national, issued a statement. This admit led the truth of the Insight report, but denied that the P S I leadership knew its Guiana office W:1,,)/(?1112 used for subversion. The PS I is an international all t.meo, London-based, of trade unions operating among public employees. Its statement con- ' firmed that in 1959-60 'one of its American affiliates, the Federa- tion of State, County and Muni- cipal Employees, offered to set up . on the P S I's behalf a department, in Guiana. The PSI did not ? know that this American affiliate had been penetrated by the C I A. The Guiana office ss as ostens- ibly for " educational activities in under-developed countries." But during the 1963 general strike tne Guiana representative of the P S I, Howard McCabe, dis- bursed saround ?100,000 in strike pay, apart from energetic advice and assistance. McCabe, nomin- ally seconded from the State,. County and Municipal Union, appears in fact to have been a C I A operative. Last week the PS I said that although its head office sent some, 'money to Guiana for relief of strikers' families as a normal act of trade-union solidarity, "at no time did the PSI suspect that McCabe may have had other funds at his disposal, or that he in- dulged in activities other than attempts to settle the strike." Insight's report last week dealt only with the C I A presence in Guianese union affairs. But the British security man we ap- proached last week?as he, is still serving, his. name cannot be mentioned?said that the C I A ' were also operating under con- sular cover, in. Guiana He said that to the best of his knowledge the agreement under which the C,] A were in Guiana Was ? the first one. allowing therti to move into a British colony. Although known at first only to Macmillan, Sandys, and the two top security men in Britain, it inevitably became known to a number of British officials in Guiana. Apart from encouraging indus- trial action against Jagan, the C I A appears to have had a good deal of success in encouraging politicians to break away from Jagan's party and government. Their technique for financing sympathetic figures was to take out heavy insurance policies for them. The C I A insured one ex- Jagan supporter for 30,000 dollars in 1964. Clearly, not all the British offi- cials on the spot were happy with what the Americans were doing: they agreed that Jagan and his American wife Janet were in- temperate Marxists, but did not feel that this justified such mas- sive manipulation of the local c. political scene. This feeling was strengthened , by the fact that the C I A. efforts were worsening the colony's already-severe racial difficulties: the Africans supported Burnham and the Indians supported Jagan, and tension.. between the two racial groups grew as the C I A levered the two sides further apart. (Eventually, this broke our in bloodshed.) Our informant indicated that he guiding spirit "Ofl the Bri- tish side of the C I A enIty a;:ree- ment was Colonial St!cre:ary Sandys. 11r. Sandy:, on toot in the Middle Ka.t, wa nti able to comment yesirr,h y ?????????1.1611?Wal....?./111???????????????????????????????????????????????????????=m10*.???????? ano ao.???????????????????? ??????????????????????????...,,..t..4,,n1.71.41,1?1?1.?.??411,..1, ....????????????,... - n,,,-inccifiori in Part - Sanitized CODV Approved for Release @ 50-Yr 2013/12/20: CIA-RDP73-00475R000401410001-7