PUBLIC TAKING 'GET-IT-OVER-WITH' VIEW ON VIETNAM

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP73-00475R000201950002-9
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 27, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 6, 2014
Sequence Number: 
2
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 13, 1966
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP73-00475R000201950002-9.pdf96.48 KB
Body: 
V V 4S LAS`I V J. VSI ANT) 'Timm T-Trm rn S TAT Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release @ 50-Yr 2014/01/06: CIA-RDP73-00475R000201950002-9 JUN J. ;3 lUbb I The Harris Survey ' 'Public Taking 'Get-a-Over- i? - ? ?? By Louis Harris . . eh '1956. The Washington Post CO. American public opinion is :rising toward increased mili- ,tancy about the Vietnam war ' and a "get it over with" mood. i. This, rather than a massive movement toward the so-called "dove" position, is behind the increased criticism of the way 'President Johnson is handling !the war. . *. IThe people show a distaste for what they regard as an in- ;decisive stalemate in which .American lives are being spent, :but they cannot arrive at any firm conclusion about what !should be done to end the war. Recent soundings of cross- sections of the American peo- ple reveal these facts: ? Public opinion is changing about bombing the North Viet- nam capital of Hanoi and the port of 'Haiphong. In 1965, the people were 2 to 1 against bombing these key population centers. Now, opinion is split down the middle, with one in three still uncertain about which course to take. ? By nearly 3 to 1, most Americans now favor.blockad- ing North Vietnam ports, -al- though 3 in 10 cannot make up their minds. ? ? In January, by a slight margin, the people were will- ing to accept free elections in South Vietnam which might result in Vietcong representa- tion in government. Now, by a slim margin, most Ameri- cans reject this as unaccept- able. One in ten of those who once favored such elections now say they are not sure. ? 'The margin by which the public would accept a neutral- ist Sotith Vietnam after nego-. liations .was over 3 tol 1 in. January but is less today. ? Even the heavy majorities. who oppose bombing the main- land of China, or using atomic ground weapons, have shrunk in the past two months. ? The oft-repeated desired of President Johnson's critics that he adopt an enclave stratp: egy and resume the bombing pause are rejected by margins of better than 2 to 1. In short, critics of Mr. John- son who argue that the .esca- lation of the war in Vietnam has been the wrong emphasis in the wrong place at. the wrong time have not convinced American public opinion that the issue is as simple as that. The following tables repre- sent results of repeated ques- tioning of comparable cross- sections of the American peo- ple since last September: "I want to read off to you a number of positions the Ad- ministration has taken on Viet- nam. For each, I wish you would tell me if you think the Ad- ministration is more right or more wrong." KEY MILITARY DECISIONS IN VIETNAM Not Blockading North Vietnam Ports More More Not ? ' Right Wrong Sure May 1966 ? 18% 53% 29% Feb. 1966 24 SO 26 Sept. 1965 31 38 31 Not Bombing Hanoi or Haiphong . May 1966 34 34 32 Feb. 1966 41 30 29 Sept 196547 70 33 Not Using Atomic' Ground Weapons May 1966 64 13 23 Feb. 1966 80 9 11 Not Bombing Chino Mainland ? May 1966 65 12 22 - Feb. 1966-- - 71 10 , '19 . Two key possible peace- ma kin g propositions : have, found .dwindliog :public 'sup, , . ....:.-11..:',..f....,___-:_.? ..t...,,... -... _L.-- ....a.. ith' View on Vietnam port since they were put forth last January: ? "Suppose part of a settlement of' the Vietnam war was to hold free elections in .SoutirVietnam which could result in the Com- munists .being part of the go* ernment..Would you favor our agreeing to such an arrange- ment, or would you be against such an agreement?". . COMMUNIST REPRESENTATION May Jan. 1966 1966 Favor such an election 37% 47% Oppose such an election 40 41 Not sure 23 12 "Suppose, after negotiations, the government of South Viet: name were neutralist?neither on our side nor on the side of the Communists ?would you favor or oppose that way to end the war?" ? NEUTRALIST SOUTH VIETNAM ?? May Jan. 1966 1966 Favor' 54% 62% ? Oppose ? . . ? 21 ? 20 ? Not Writ ' 25 11I The real shift 'W.:American public opinion over. Vietnam can perhaps best be gauged in. a recent re-asking of a ques-.: tion the Harris Survey repeat-, edly tested in 1965: ? "All in all, what do you think' we should do about Vietnam? We can follow one of three courses: carry the ground War. into North?Victnam at the risk' of bringing Red China into the, fighting?withdraw our support and troops front South Vietnam ?or continue to try to hold the line there to prevent the Com.-' munists front taking over South Vietnam. Which do you favor?" ? Hold With- Carry Lino draw War to Support North May 1966 47% 15% 39% December1963 65 7 28 September 196$ 49 75 26 . ? May 196$ 47 31 ? 77 . March 1963 49 ? 38 13 Sentiment for withdrawal has doubled since December,. but it still is less than half- that of a year ago. The num- ber who feel we should carry: the ground war -into 'North. Vietnam has ? almos.t ?. tripled; since March, 1965.? . Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release @ 50-Yr 2014/01/06: CIA-RDP73-00475R000201950002-9