STUDY ON POSSIBLE CO-LOCATION OF CIA AND SAC U-2 ASSETS
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP72R00410R000200030001-3
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
T
Document Page Count:
3
Document Creation Date:
December 12, 2016
Document Release Date:
July 1, 2002
Sequence Number:
1
Case Number:
Publication Date:
December 20, 1966
Content Type:
MF
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 105.63 KB |
Body:
Approved For Release 2002/08120: bl a-`F 6P72R00410R000200030001-3
NRO REVIEW COMPLETED
DRAFT 20 Dec 66
MEMORANDUM FOR
SUBJECT: Study on Possible Co-Location of CIA and SAC U-2 Assets
As you will recall, at the November 23 ExCom meeting, the
possibility of co-locating CIA and SAC U-2 assets at a single
base as an economy measure was introduced by the BOB representa-
tive. The NRO was committed to study this matter and report
back to the ExCom.
I understand General Bacalis' people have up-dated some
of the information gathered last Summer pertinent to the U-2R 25X1
discussions then taking place. In that regard, I have reviewed
Attachment F to your July 1966 memorandum to the DNRO, subject:
"Utilization of U-2 Assets and Future U-2 Programs"
and note that it addresses mostly the question of fleet pooling
rather than co-location of assets. In the latter vein, I
propose that CIA-OSA chair a joint study group (CIA-OSA, NRO
Staff, and a representative of Col Saunders' office) to develop
a "strawman" concept for co-location and examine its feasibility
and/or desirability.
As an example, a possible concept of co-location might envisage
Agency Detachment at Davis-Monthan AFB, including aircraft,
ILLEGIB
Approved
Approved For Release 2002/08/20 :4CG4cRO27.2R00410R000200030001-3
25X1
ILLEGIB
cons (many of which are identified in Attachment F to
of the proposal.
aircrews, flight-line maintenance personnel, and operations
and support personnel and fly-away equipment necessary for
deployment or staging of CIA aircraft at overseas locations.
At Davis-Monthan, it would appear feasible for SAC to provide
base maintenance, supply, and other support, and to operate
common operations, weather, communications, etc, facilities.
The joint study group should either expand on this philosophy
or develop a more suitable concept for the co-location of U-2
assets at Davis-MonthanAFB, determine the capability of that
facility to support such an operation, and examine the pros and
If you agree with this approach, please designate'a group
will represent the NRO
Staff and obtain a representative from Col Saunders' office.
chairman from CIA-OSA.
James T. Stewart
Approvec! For Release 2002/08/20 : CIA-RDP72R00410R000200030001-3
25X1
25X1
Approved For Release 2002/08/20: CIA-RDP72R00410R000200030001-25X1
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY
MEMORANDUM
December-20, 1966
25X1
.We feel there was a firm commitment
to the Ex_Com, as a result of the BOB query,
to carefully assess the feasibility and
desirability of co-locating CIA Edwards AFB
U-2's and SAC U-2's at a single air base
'(Davis-Monthan).
There seems to be some confusion
as to who (if anyone) is seriously working
on this matter. Mr. Reber and I propose
to send you the attached to formalize the
.task.
25X1
Comments, please, at your early
Stewart
or General, USAF 4'
!rector, NRO Staff
25X1
25X1
Approved For Release 2002/08/20 : CIA-RDP72R00410R0Q0200030001'.
Attachment
draft dtd
20 Dec 66