FULBRIGHT WARNS ON CUBA

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP72-00337R000200260012-6
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 10, 2001
Sequence Number: 
12
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 28, 1970
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP72-00337R000200260012-6.pdf201.98 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2003/03/25 : CIA-RDP72-00337R000200260012-6 Fulbright Warns on Cuba DATE PAGE Sen. J. William Fulbright (D-Ark.) cautioned the U.S. government yesterday against nuclear brinkmanship in trying to prevent the Soviet Union from establishing a major submarine base in Cuba. The chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee said that to assume the Sovi- ets have no right to establish a base in Cuba is a very ques- tionable proposition. y The Pentagon announced Friday it had evidence that the Soviet Union was building a submarine base in Cuba, and the White House said it would regard with the utmost seri. ousness the positioning of So- viet strategic missiles there. Fulbright, interviewed on the television program "Issues and Answers" (ABC, WMAL), said he did not believe the U.S. could successfully engage in brinkmanship in nuclear weapons. Fulbright said the situation in Cuba calls for diplomacy, not bluff, and urged a redou- bling of efforts to reach a stra- tegic arms limitation agree- ment with the Soviet Union. Without such an agreement, he said, "They will build bases and we will build bases until there will probably be a con- frontation." Approved For Release 2003/03/25 : CIA-RDP72-00337R000200260012-6 NEW Approved For Release 2003/03/25 : CIA-RDP72-00337F O00Z 260012, 1% 11-1 E 2 !ry -.. _ ff ES YORK TIM U.S WARNS SOVIET '.NOm TO BUILD BASE FORSUBSINCUBA intelligence Indicates It May Be Constructing Facility --'62 Warning Recalled BATA REMAIN UNCLEAR efforts at Cienfuegos Being Watched Closely, Perhaps With U-2 Spy Planes By ROBERT M. SMITH Sp, Iar to Tho Naw York Times WASHINGTON, Sept. 25-- The White House, recalling the Moscow-Washington under- standing that ended the Cuban missile crisis of 1962, warned the Soviet Union today -against building a strategic submarine base in Cuba. The White House warning 'following a disclosuer that the United States had intelligence data.. indicating. that the Rus- sians might be building facili- ties at Cienfuegos, on Cuba's south coast, to support the op- erations of their submarines. The Administration official, who asked reporters to identify him as a White House source without using his name, said that the Government was watching developments in Cuba piece of paper he had brought with him to the briefing-a briefing that had been arranged to provide reporters with back- ground on President Nixon's forthcoming trip to Europe. The quotation was from a speech by President Kennedy on Nov. 2, 1962, at the conclu- sion, of the crisis created by the Soviet attempt to introduce medium- and intermediate-range missiles into Cuba. The Presi- dent said: Policy Still the Same "If all offensive weapons are removed from Cuba and kept ,out of the Hemisphere in the future, under adequate verifica- tion and safeguards, and if Cuba is not used for the export of aggressive Communist pur- poses, there will be peace in the Caribbean." After reading that sentence, the official said: "The operative part, of course is 'If all offen- sive weapons are removed from Cuba and kept out of the Hemisphere in the future.' This, were building a submarine sup-, port base.' They have noted Soviet naval activity in the area, including recent visits by' ships and the to win of thrg barges from avana_ I Q _ ien- iiegos. Mr. Friedheim jjgd that some o e merican intelli- gence came from fli h s, 9X1' Cuba b U 2 reco9Rg?A,a.nce arrcra U-2 Flights Continue I U-2 flights over Cuba have continued since the missile crisis and have been tolerated by the Cubans, apparently without incident. . President Kennedy, in his speech; said the Uinted states had "no choice but to pursue its own means of checking. on military activities in Cuba" if offensive weapons were to be kept out. At a briefing this afternoon, a second -White House official reiterated that "there is no confirmation that there is a strategic base" in Cienfuegos .and said there were no Soviet submariens in Cienfuegos Bay. Pentagon spokesmen said there were four Soviet ships in the port: a submarine tender, a tank-landing ship, a rescue tug and a salvage ship. Observers here pointed out that the strategic implications of a Soviet naval facility in Cuba-even one that would service submarines carrying missiles with a 1,500-mile range --were quite different from the [Soviet attempt to put missiles in Cuba in 1962. of course, remains the policy of this Government." The official appeared -to be reminding the Soviet Union of the understanding reportedly reached in 1962. In his speech, "Chairman Khrushchev .... In 1962, they say, the United ,agreed to remove from Cuba all ,States had overwhelming nuc- weapons systems capable of of-, dear :superiority, which the So- -.-- i introduction of such weapons into Cuba, and to permit appro-' priate United Nations observa- tion and supervision to insure the carrying out and continua- L___ (United States. on our part agreed that once these adequate arrangements for verification had been estab- lished we would remove our naval quarantine and give assurances against an invasion of Cuba." The Pentagon comment on Soviet activity at Cienfuegos, which is southeast of Havana, came from Jerry W. Friedheim Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs. He said that the Penta on had. dicat'ons that 'F el- o ~T~eli vvc t at Ussians waantedto t i ai~fuily bti.t that 2t "a' no ayy what yet ina fro ition to s Russianswere building. Keunedy Speech Recalled "We are watching the devel- opment of Soviet naval activity and of possible construction there," the official said. "We ..are watching it very closely. The Soviet Union can be under no doubt that we would view the establishment of a vtrate"ic ? 1 ?,n with the e esta is a permanent sua- r o acility--in Cuba. redheim stressed that Viet pinion was try ng to re- dress. Now there is much greater parity, and the Russians can, and do 'operate submarines r 11 \ Auban nav. -yvquldl e ' give th e Soviet pion?tw vantages, according to Rear m. Norvell Ward, command- er of the Caribbean- sea frontier. Reached by telephone in San Juan, Puerto Rico, Admiral Ward said that submarines uld en more time off the East oast i grey are based in e Western Atlantic than if they were based in the Soviet Union-they wouldn't have to spend time going back and forth." Submarines have to have a protected anchorage-"smooth water"-to make repairs and get provisions, he explained. The second gain the Russians would derive, the admiral said, was "political advantage." A naval-officer at the Penta- gon pointed out that the Rus- sians had shown their flag in the Caribbean only since July of last year. "This clearly indi- cates their intention to operate in our waters," he said. "We can obviously look forward to seeing Russians off our coasts more. and more." Some observers speculated that Soviet naval activity in the area might pose more of a hazard to political stability in Latin America than to the Unit- ed States security. A source in the intelligence community said that what the Russians appeared to be build- ing was a rather limited facil- ity, not a submarine base on the scale of American bases at Holy Loch, Scotland; or Rota, Spain. In The New York Times to- day, C.L. Sulzberger reported in his column that the Adminis- tration was investigating infor- mation that a Soviet naval in- stallation was being built at Cienfuegos. iev J4 Elavana ._:-~.~_ base in tile car w, . roved F utmost seriousn P~ The White House official then turned to a quotation on a tionS anlsure the Russians The New York TImes