JOURNAL OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP71B00364R000500210027-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 1, 2003
Sequence Number: 
27
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 25, 1966
Content Type: 
NOTES
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP71B00364R000500210027-1.pdf224.24 KB
Body: 
6 4 R 2 , 9 0 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 - 1 2 JOURNAL OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL Friday - 25 February 1966 STAT STAT 1. I- JGO) Met with Mr. E. Sampayrac, DOD, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Manpower, concerning DOD comments on the Agency legislative package. Mr. Sampayrac indicated that as of this morning he does not have in hand comments of the three services and the Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Affairs. Mr. Sampayrac noted that one component is expanding its use of overseas personnel and is quite interested in several authorities contained in this proposed legislation and that it would be the first part of the week before this question of the extent of interest would be resolved. When I noted thati of NSSTATINTL had called and talked to us, Mr. Sampayrac admitted that this was the component in question and that there was some desire on the part of NSA to ride this bill. After some discussion of the particular provisions, Mr. Sampayrac inquired whether the Agency would have objection to inclusion of NSA. I responded that although the Agency would like to provide all possible assistance to NSA, as we have in the past, that this particular legislation was composite of some 15 or more almost unrelated items and that to add the interest of another Agency could be a serious complicating factor. Mr. Sampayrac appeared most sympathetic to this point of view and indicated that he would call me as early in the week as possible. Other than the NSA interest, he saw no problem in DOD concurrence in our legislative package. 2. I I- JGO) Met with Mr. David Minton, Senate Post Office and Civil Service Committee, and discussed with him, in general terms, the content of our proposed legislative package and advised that as soon as we have cleared BOB, would comey aria-meel with him and, if appropriate, with Mr. John Burzio, the Staff Director. Mr. Minton affirmed my brief understanding that Mr. Burzio is still somewhat tied up with matters that have carried over from the Aviation Subcommittee of the Commerce Committee, which he had been handling for the Chairman before assuming his present directorship. He also indicated that we would like to have Mr. Minton and Mr. Burzio out to lunch with our staff at their convenience in the near future. Mr. Minton accepted the luncheon invitation and indicated that he and Mr. Burzio would look forward to meeting with our staff. Approved For Release 2003/08/18 : CIA-RDP71 B00364R000500210QW, 6/5/2003 Approved For Release 2003/08/18 : CIA-RDP71 B00364R000500210027-1 Journal - Office of Legislative Counsel Page 3 Thursday - 24 February 1966 25X1 25X1 STATINTL 25X1 STATINTL 25X1 11. 1I CEA) Discussed thel case with Fred STATINTL^ Mesmer, Staff Director of the Senate Immigration Subcommittee. I pointed out that Representative Feighan has reservations on this bill and either Senator Williams or Senator Eastland should speak to Mr. Feighan about it. Mr. Mesmer said that he would get in touch with Senator Williams and suggested that I ask Senator Eastland to discuss it with Mr. Feighan. 12. I I- LLM) Spoke with Mr. Thad Murray, in Representative Porter Hardy's office, in connection with his earlier inquiry on former Agency employee I gave him what little information I had and said we were in the process of getting all the facts pulled together on this 1956 case. Mr. Murray said that would be fine and mentioned that the widow, in her own way, had apparently misunderstood as something improper what had most likely been an act of consideration and concern by Agency representatives.' 13. LLM) I NSA, called in connection with our proposed legislation now pending in BOB. I briefly explained what the package consisted of, said we would send him a copy, and that Mr. Warner would be most happy to go over it in detail with him. 14. I - G LC) Talked with Pat Holt, Senate Foreign Relations Committee staff, regarding his request for information on insurgency in Latin America and his specific reference to the existence of an NIE on this subject. After consulting the Office of the DD/I and Mr. Abbot Smith, ONE, and acting on instructions from the Director, I informed Holt that while there was an estimate on this subject there were problems involved in its release outside of intelligence channels but that the Director had instructed this Office to have one of the experts who participated in the drafting of the estimate meet with Holt and brief him on the subject. Holt seemed to under- stand and said this was entirely satisfactory with him. I told him that we would arrange to meet with him at his convenience and he is to advise us as to a suitable time. One or two ONE briefers will be provided for this meeting. Approved For Release 2003/08/18 : CIA-RDP71 B00364R000500210027-1 Approved For Release 2003/08/18 : CIA-RDP71 B00364R000500210027-1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 \Ut Journal - Office of Legislative Counsel Thursday - 24 February 1966 Page 2 6. JSW) called indicating STATINTL^ that he had reviewed our legislative package and he was considering the possibility of suggesting in their response to the Bureau of the Budget, that the Department of Defense ask that similar authorities be extended to NSA employees presumably in the travel and medical fields. He planned to discuss this with General Carter and wanted to know our views. I indicated that this would complicate the matter and anything that tended to complicate, of course, we would not like to see but that we would not raise any objection. I suggested, however, that he consider that these are only a part of the package since the basic authorities are in P. L. 110; further, he might well wish to discuss the problems he might have in DOD. He might wish to take more time than he has now for NSA to pull together their justification and approach the problem on the merits with DOD and BOB. 8. 1 I- CEA) Called on Arthur Kuhl, Chief Clerk of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and arranged for security precautions for the Director's briefing of the Committee. Also prepared a seating chart of the Committee. 9, CEA) F confirmed security arrangements regarding the transcript of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee briefing. 10. CEA) Delivered the agency information brochure to the office of Senator a ph Yarborough for forwarding to a constituent. Approved For Release 2003/08/18 : CIA-RDP71 B00364R000500210027-1 25X1 25X1 Approved Forele se 2003/08/18 : CIA-RDP71800364R Q 500210027-1 "4 -4 JOURNAL OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL Thursday - 24 February 1966 STAT STAT STAT STAT STAT 25X1 C 1? ~- JGO) Talked to Mr. Bernard Martin, Legislative Division, BOB, who advised that the DOD comment on the Agency legis ative package is still outstanding. Comments received contain no objections to our proposals but do provide minor suggestions. 2? - JGO) Met with Mr. M. Convisser, Legisla- tive Division, BOB, and reviewed with him the Civil Service Commission comments on the Agency legislative package. Although the comments were minor in nature, they are helpful and are appropriate for inclusion. Mr. Convisser had several questions of his own with regard to back- ground of the various sections, which were readily resolved. 3. I I- JGO) Made an appointment to meet with Mr. Edward Sa yrac, , concerning DOD comments on the Agency legislative package. His office indicates that only a few of the DOD components have as yet responded. 4. I I- JSW) Telephoned Bill Darden, Senate Armed Services Committee and advised him that the letter he had furnished to me earlier did not involve the Agency. I further informed him that apparently Senator Russell's personal office had written to the Department of State on this. I advised him that the Army was the depart- ment involved and they had informed us that they would be directly in touch with Bill Jordan in the Senator's office. Darden agreed that there was no necessity for further action on our part. He did request that the letter be returned to him. 5. I I- JSW) Mr. Helms advised that Senator Eugene Mc%~art yy ha iscussed with him the case of McCarthy had indicated that Representative Emanuel Celler wished some assurance that this individual would have a job. Mr. Helms requested that we advised Mr. Celler that he will have a job. Approved For Release 2003/08/18 : CIA-RDP71 B00364R000500210027-1 25X1 C