HOPEFUL, STEPS IN MIDDLE EAST

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP70B00338R000300060021-6
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
January 4, 2017
Document Release Date: 
July 15, 2005
Sequence Number: 
21
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 27, 1968
Content Type: 
OPEN
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP70B00338R000300060021-6.pdf355.53 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2005/07/25 : CIA-RDP70B00338R000300060021-6 February 27, 1968 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOUSE H 1453 Because of the tremendous number of MORE COOPERATION IN PERSIAN and public opinion leaders there and also credit reports handled, the possibility of GULF at the prior Ditchley House Conference error is always present. Perhaps the most fre- in England led me to the conclusion that quent error involves mistaken identity; that (Mr. MONAGAN asked and was given a failure to negotiate now would have is, a derogatory item is entered on the record permission to extend his remarks at this serious consequences not only for the of one individual which, in fact, involves an- point in the RECORD.) parties but for the United States. other individual with a similar name. Mr. MONAGAN. Mr. Speaker, on Feb- Therefore, the news that the extreme Incompleteness also is characteristic of the ruary 21, 1968, in this Chamber I spoke of system. Staff Reporter Stanford N. Sesser of positions of the antagonists had been the wall -Street Journal pointed out in a re- the critical situation in the Middle East- modified came as an encouraging and cent article that in the New York City met- and particularly in the Persian Gulf- hopeful development. ropolitan area each year about 780,000 derog- which has arisen because of the prospec- With the objections to the form of the atory items are filed. The vast majority of tive withdrawal of the British from this prospective meeting removed, it seems them, about 550,000, are information on law- area before 1971. At that time I stated quite that progress can now be suits filed, gleaned from court records. How that cooperation of the Trucial States, made toward a discussion of the substan- the lawsuits are settled never gets recorded. Iran and Saudi Arabia in effect or in tive matters in argument: refugees, firm. An industry official, interviewed by Sesser, claimed that checking the disposition of cases actuality would be a necessity if subver- to be resisted. I boundaries and free passage of the Suez would be too expensive. Sion or aggression were Canal and the Gulf of Aqaba. The opportunity for malicious derogatory also pointed out the vital interest of the Although no real progress on the main reports is also ever-present. Suppose a man United States in that area and the danger issues can be claimed at this time, the gets a transmission job on his car, drives which a radical disturbance of current fact is that the logjam blocking discus- three blocks and has the transmission fall arrangements there would hold for us. sions has been broken and real move- out on.the street. He feels he shouldn't have I also expressed the pleasure which all ment is now possible toward a permanent to pay for this, and he doesn't. But the trans- interested parties felt in the announce- arrangement that will provide a greater mission shop can-and in many cases does- retaliate by turning in a derogatory report to ment that two of the Trucial States, Abu guarantee of permanent peace in that the credit agency. Dadabi and Dubai planned to join for- area. A CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE eign policy, defense, and citizenship. This We must recognize, of course, that the When consumers rae refused credit for no seemed to be a substantial step in the obstacles to complete agreement on all apparent reason, their natural reaction is to right direction. subjects are very great. Nevertheless, the attempt to find out why. In most cases it is Now has come the statement in this emphasis now can be put upon "bargain- all but impossible to do so because the credit morning's press that the seven Trucial ing in good faith" rather than upon a bureaus and their customers have erected a States and the Sheikdoms of Qatar and possible return to war to settle the mat- wall of silence around their operations to Bahrain are planning a federation to ters under dispute. protect them from law suits. Although for control defense, foreign affairs, and cul- Under unanimous consent ices a I include $25-$50 one can buy a credit bureau's sere- tural matters. Of course, this position the article at this point in the RECORD: ices and get information on perhaps millions assumes the irrevocable character of the [From the Washington (D.C.) Post, Fa. 27, of other persons, an individual is never al- lowed to see his own credit report. The most British decision which is violently dis- 19681 any agency will do is accept a written com- puted in Great Britain itself and which MIDEAST TALKS UNDER U.N. SEEN NAB plaint which may or may not be checked out. just conceivably might be reversed. How- (By Robert H. Estabrook) Again and again there have been reports ever, planning must be carried on with UNnED NATIONS, N.Y., February .6.-A from individuals who have unsuccessfully the premise that British withdrawal, if possible new initiative in Arab-Israel'peace sought information upon refusal of credit, anything, may even come before 1971. discussions appeared to be opening today or have obtained information only after great This is encouraging news indeed and I with the announcement that Unitedlations effort. Recently, for example, a New York State assemblyman introduced a bill into the am sure that all of us hope that this con- Special Representative Gunnar V. Jarring Legislature calling for disclosure to an in- federation will be implemented and that will return to New York briefly for casulta- dividual of his own credit report. His action the work of creating a new structure to tions. What seems likely is that Jarring as pro- by a personal incident. Turned down replace that of the British will be swiftly Vg p Wh a form likely negotiations erring Egypt, by a major credit card company, he was able pursued. Jordan and Israel each would send negates to obtain information on the reason why only All the support which the United to meet in Cyprus under his chairmiship. after considerable trouble and after identify- States ban give should be offered to sup- Israeli Foreign Minister Abba l n said ing himself as a legislator. He then intro- port this eo federation. today in Jerusalem that his governEnt had h t ' a W duced a bill because as he put it: agreed to "a form of negotiations"f a sort happens to the poor guy who walks off the 'which Arab governments have u'ized in street with no leverage?" HOPE STEPS IN MIDDLE EAST the past and which does not deft from THE ZABLOCKI PROPOSAL precedent." The measure proposed by Congressman (Mr. MONAGAN asked and was given This was interpreted as a referee to the ZABLOCKI simply would give every American permission to extend his remarks at this procedure employed in 1949 by RalpEunche citizen and consumer the right to see, and point in the RECORD.) now U.N. Under Secretary Oenerawvhereby where necessary, to take steps to correct, his Mr. MONAGAN. Mr. Speaker, I read Israeli and Arab representatives Ir, on the own credit records. It is based on the belief with great happiness the news in this Island of Rhodes to conclude anmistice. that a person should have the right to know Bunche often served as a "messger" be- the evidence used against him by potential morning's paper with the statement of tween delegations. creditors-just as he has a Constitutional Abba Eban that there finally seemed to [President Nasser of Egypt was N under- right to confront witnesses against him-and be some movement. toward discussions stood to be ready to send represeltives to to have the report corrected or amended if between the Arabs and Israelis under the such U.N. negotiations, the Lond Sunday it is wrong or incomplete. In a sense then, auspices of Gunnar V. Jarring, the spe- Times reported from Cairo.] the bill would establish some right of "due cial representative of the United Nations. Any face-to-face meeting now uld be a process" in credit for American consumers. On February 12, I pointed out to the substantial concession on the p- of the It would affect only credit reports made by House the urgent need for compromise Arabs, who have declared that theiould not credit agencies which operate in interstate by the parties to the June 5 war if any talk directly with the Israelis. Butformula commerce or make use of the facilities of whereby Jarring would share thneetings interstate commerce. It would not, therefore, meaningful negotiations were to be might enable them to say they helot par- have any impact on merchant-to-merchant achieved. I emphasized the serious results ticipated in direct negotiations. credit inquiries within a community. Fur- that might flow from a return of Mr. Similarly, the recognition of a T. role in ther, the Federal Reserve Board would be em- Jarring to the United Nations with a re- peace talks would be a concessio)y Israel, powered to oversee the operation of the law port that his efforts had been fruitless which heretofore has insisted th.rt would and to make exceptions in it if certain re- and that the disputants were holding to discuss borders and troop withd'al only quirements are an undue burden on credit radically divergent and unrealistic posi- In direct negotiations. transactions. However, attempts to block dis- A spokesman for Secretary GeneU Thant closure by denying that an agency has made Lions. said Jarring was returning to 1, U.N. at a report on an individual would be pro- My recent visit to the Middle East and Thant's request to consider "pole next hibited. my discussions with political, business, steps and the prospect for_ enter upon a Approved For Release 2005/07/25 : CIA-RDP70B00338R000300060021-6 H 1454 Approved For Release 2005/07/25 : CIA-RDP70B00338R00030006'0021-6 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOUSE February 27, 1968 new stage in the discussions." Jarring then will return to his headquarters in Nicosia, Cyprus. Despite the limited tangible results so far from his frequent meetings in Jerusalem, Amman, and Cairo, diplomatic sources say that no party has wanted Jarring's mission to end. Reports that Israel has termed the mission a failure have been denied by Israeli sources here. The Swedish diplomat arranged the release of 5000 Egyptian prisoners held by Israel, but his efforts to free 15 ships trapped in the Suez Canal collapsed after renewed fighting. Egypt ignored Israeli warnings in attempting to send a survey ship through part of the Canal. Jarring was in Amman today and will visit Jerusalem Tuesday. PEACEFUL USES OF ATOMIC ENERGY (Mr. HARRISON asked and was given permission to extend his remarks at this point in the RECORD.) Mr. HARRISON. Mr. Speaker, the nuclear genie unloosed by the necessities of World War II holds both potential for our destruction and promise for our bet- terment. - The peaceful uses ofatomic energy are many and varied. We know today that nuclear-run elec- trical powerplants are feasible. Nuclear power may eventually desalt the waters of olr oceans for irrigation and con- sixmttion. We know from the success of projwwt "Gasbuggy" in New Mexico last year, that a nuclear explosion can be safell used in stimulating the production of mural gas. We'eel as well that nuclear power can help l extract oil from shale in the enorm3lsly rich Green River Formation of Wycping, Colorado, and Utah. We bow too little of what lies ahead of us ft the full development of peace- ful usejf atomic energy. Theri is evidence, however, that ex- tractiofof the key ingredient of nuclear power--iranium-can be extremely haz- ardous I the health of miners. These are among a reasons why I today introduce a jomtcesolution to create 'a Federal Commi -e on Nuclear Safety and Peace- ful Dev;pment. Envished in this resolution is a 15- membei?ommittee composed of a chair- man, t vIembers of the House of Rep- resentat}ts, two Members of the Senate, the Sec aries of Interior, Commerce, Labor, F lth, Education, and Welfare, and six tubers of the general public who ar ecially qualified to consider and eval the technological, economic, and socpgical impact of the atomic energy pgram. The Ctmittee on Nuclear Safety and Peacefu:evelopment will consider and assess: First. Iw best to accelerate projects invoivin.fe and peaceful uses of atom- ic energ,i'ith emphasis on the use of nuclear donations to retort oil from shale airstimulate the production of natural 4, Seconc'he health hazards encoun- tered by ons engaged in the mining of uraniummd other radioactive elements, and howst to safeguard against such hazards, z Third. Methods of effectively lntegrat- Ing atomic energy into the general energy complex of the United States so that rea- sonable priorities may be determined, and Fourth. The impact of the subsidized atomic energy upon competitive indus- tries not subsidized. Whether nuclear power will continue to be simply an efficient means of mili- tary annihilation, or whether it will be allowed to better show the bright side of its Janus face and become the willing servant of industrial technology and economic expansion, will depend, to a great extent on actions taken by Con- gress. I believe that the creation of a Federal Committee on Nuclear Safety and Peace- ful Development would be one more means for us to not only understand, but to shape, the nuclear future of America and the free world. PROTECTION OF DEFENSE FACIL- ITIES AND CLASSIFIED INFORMA- TION (Mr. WILLIS asked and was given per- mission to extend his remarks at this point in the RECORD.) Mr. WILLIS. Mr. Speaker, a number of recent decisions in the Federal courts have had the serious effect of undermin- ing the national effort to maintain the security of defense facilities, the secur- ity of classified information released to industry, and the security of vessels and waterfront facilities, against espionage, sabotage, and other subversive activity. The decisions, among others, to which I refer are United States against Eugene Frank Robel, decided December 11, 1967, in which the Supreme Court voided sec- tion 5(a) (1) (D) of the Subversive Ac- tivities Control Act of 1950 which made punishable employment of members of Communist-action organizations In de- fense facilities; Herbert Schneider against Willard Smith, Commandant, United States Coast Guard, decided Jan- uary 16, 1968 in which the Supreme Court declared that the President's se- curity screening program which he ap- plied to vessels of the United States lacked specific congressional authoriza- tion under the provisions of the Magnu- son Act (50 U.S.C. 191 (b) ) ; and the Feb- ruary 1968 decision of the Federal Dis- trict Court at Los Angeles in the case of Dexter C. Shoultz against Secretary of Defense, in which the Secretary was re- strained from suspending a secret clear- ance to classified information, on the ground that the procedures adopted were not authorized by the Congress. The latter decision particularly. cast grave doubts upon significant and vital features of the industrial security pro- gram authorized by the President in 1960 under Executive Order 10865, following the 1959 decision of the Supreme Court In Greene v. McElroy, 360 U.S. 474, which struck down in part provisions of the industrial security clearance review program established for some years prior thereto under regulations of the Secretary of Defense. The Greene case held that in the absence of congressional or Presidential action, the regulations of the Secretary of Defense were without sufficient support in law. The decision, however, made clear that the court did not decide then whether the President had inherent authority to create such a program or whether congressional action was necessary. While the House has ad- dressed itself to this problem in the past, no bill has been enacted into law to re- solve this ambiguity. Obviously these security programs are of the most vital importance to the se- curity of the United States. No one can deny that in this period of protracted conflict, forced upon us by aggressive ele- ments abroad, it would be the utmost folly to relax our precautions. Neverthe- less, our most vital installations and ef- forts are placed in serious jeopardy un- less Congressi acts promptly to remedy the monstrous consequences threatened as a result of deficiencies revealed in the aforementioned and other related deci- sions of the courts. I have, accordingly, today introduced a bill in which I am joined by 24 Members of the majority party. The provisions of this bill will give express congressional sanction to the President to issue neces- sary regulations and to institute such safeguards as may be necessary to pro- tect sensitive defense facilities and clas- sified information, together with the pro- tection of vessels, ports, and waterfront facilities. This bill is, I believe, prepared with the most scrupulous attention to decisions of the courts and within the limits of the powers, and in response to the duties, imposed on us by the Con- stitution of the United States. In light of the urgency of the situation. I assure the House that the committee of which I am chairman will promptly conduct hearings on this and related bills refer- red to us, with a view toward expediting action by the Congress. UNSEEN FINGERS (Mr. ASHBROOK asked and was given permission to extend his remarks at this point in the RECORD and to include ex- traneous- matter.) Mr. ASHBROOK. Mr. Speaker, recent- ly I received a sales letter advancing the merits of a piece of office equipment and suggesting a possible explanation for the outcome of a 20-year-old Texas election now famous in political history. The pos- sibility was offered that the unseen fingers of a bank of automatic type- writers composing thousands of cam- paign letters might have been the differ- ence at the ballot box. The lead para- graph from the above-cited letter reads as follows: AMERICAN AUTOMATIC TYPEWRITER CO., Chicago, Ill., February 15, 1968. Hon. JOHN M. ASHBROOK, House of Representatives; House Office Building, Washington, D.C. DEAR CONGRESSMAN: Twenty years ago this month a congressman from South Texas, named Lyndon B. Johnson, called me on the phone and ordered eight Auto-typists for an office he was opening in Austin for his cam- paign for the Democratic nomination for United States Senator. We got him off the eight Auto-typists and he sent out thousands of personal letters. For your information, he won the primary by 82 votes out of 2,000,000. If he had only bought seven Auto-typists, he might have lost. Approved For Release 2005/07/25 : CIA-RDP70B00338R000300060021-6