CONGRESSIONAL RECORD--SENATE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP69B00369R000200020084-0
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 7, 2004
Sequence Number: 
84
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 14, 1967
Content Type: 
OPEN
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP69B00369R000200020084-0.pdf418 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2904/05/05 : CIA-RDP69600369R000200020084-0 March 14, 1967 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD ? SENATE Committee on the Judiciary, I wish to announce a change in the hearings on the Federal jury selection process. The hearings on March 21, originally scheduled for 9:30 a.m., in room 4200 of the New Senate Office Building, will be changed to 2 p.m. of that same day in room 6226 of the New Senate Office Building. The hearings on March 22 and 29 will still be held as scheduled, at 9:30 a.m., in room 4200 of the New Sen- ate Office Building. NOTICE OF HEARING ON RIGHT OF PRIVACY ACT OF 1967 Mr. LONG of Missouri. Mr. President, on Monday, March 20, the Senate Sub- committee on Administrative Practice and Procedure, of which I am chairman, will begin hearings on S. 928, the Right of Privacy Act of 1967. There are many complex and detailed problems involved In considering legislation which would grant to every American citizen their right of privacy. Wiretapping and elec- tronic eavesdropping, more often re- ferred to as "bugging,': is especially com- plex. Opinions in this area range from all-out bans on snooping to complete permissiveness by Federal, State, and local police. Recently, Judge J. Edward Lumbard, chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit appeared be- fore Senator MCCLELLAN'S Subcommit- tee on Criminal Laws and Procedures. The New York Times of Sunday, March 12, reprinted excerpts from this testi- mony. We intend to hear all sides of the issue; in fact, I have today invited Judge Lumbard to testify before my sub- committee, and give us the benefit of his educated views. Mr. President, I ask unanimous con- sent to insert, at this point in the RECORD, the excerpts from the New York Times. There being no objection, the excerpts were ordered to be printed in the RECORD, as follows: ANOTHER OPINION?IN DEFENSE OF WIRETAPPING The following are excerpts from the testi- mony last week of J. Edward Lombard, Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, before a Senate subcom- mittee considering wiretap legislation: "Any proposals for expanding and clari- fying the powers of law enforcement agen- cies must be considered in light of the fact that it has become more and more difficult for these agencies to secure sufficient evi- dence of crime to justify arrest, prosecution and conviction. "First, decisions? of the Supreme Court now require law enforcement agents to warn suspects who are in custody of their rights in such a way that those who otherwise would voluntarily speak are now virtually encouraged not to do so. Moreover, the requirement that, before any questioning, counsel must be available, if desired, and that counsel be furnished if the suspect cannot get counsel himself, prevents or post- pones questioning at the very time that it would be most fruitful. Thus in many cases the most ready, the most authentic and the most natural, means a getting information by the voluntary statement of the person best able to tell, is no longer available. "Second, court decisions have made it im- possible to secure testimony before grand juries and Government bodies where there Is any claim of Fifth Amendment privilege, however far-fetched it might be. "Third, revolutionary developments in the speed and means of travel and communica- tion have enabled organized crime to operate countrywide, secretly through agents who may be far removed, and in such ways that detection is not only difficult but almost im- possible in view of present restrictions. At the same time it is now unlawful for law enforcement agencies to tap telephone wires and divulge what is thus obtained and the use of any electronic devices is being ques- tioned. "There is a fourth obstacle: the increasing reluctance of victims to come forward to complain and to testify. As law enforce- ment difficulties increase and the likelihood of successful prosecutions decreases, those Who suffer from organized crime become more fearful of the consequences of speak- ing.... "In the light of today's crisis in law en- forcement, the old arguments against wire- tapping are no longer weighty. "We cannot have effective law enforcement without running the risks of some invasion of privacy; no good citizen who places any value on living in an orderly and peaceful society where crime is under reasonable con- trol should object to those occasional an- noyances which sometimes are the by-prod- uct of a suitable police action. "WIRETAPPING NECESSARY "If wiretapping by law enforcement agents is legalized because, as I believe, it is neces- sary, it will not be "dirty business." Those who oppose wiretapping have always relied heavily on the eloquent dissent of Justice Holmes in Olmstead V. United States, 277 U.S. 438, where the majority permitted the Government to use wiretap evidence to con- vict bootleggers despite the fact that the wiretapping was itself a crime in violation of laws of the State of Washington. Of course there was no federal law on the sub- ject at the time. "Justice Holmes called it 'dirty business' because the evidence was 'obtained and only obtainable by a criminal act,' i.e. a violation of state law, and he held that courts should exclude evidence obtained by a crime com- mitted by the officers of the law. "It seems clear that had there been a Federal law which permitted wiretapping, upon findings of the public necessity for such legislation, as S. 675 proposes, Justice Holmes would not have said what he did about wiretapping, even in 1928; it would not have been 'dirty business' had the law au- thorized it. "It was Justice Holmes who wrote in 1880, 'The life of the law is not logic but ex- perience.' The bootleggers whose convictions were affirmed in the Olmstead, case in 1928 were public benefactors compared to the professional criminals of 1967. "There is no dirtier business today than the business of organized crime; it rules by violence and terror; it victimizes the public and corrupts public officials. Every possible resource of Government should be used to expose and destroy it. "COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATIONS "The report of the President's Commission ends its discussion of electronic surveillance by pointing out that the 'present status of the law with respect to wiretapping and bug- ging is intolerable' and that the present controversy must be resolved. A majority of the Commission favors legislation 'granting carefully circumscribed authority for elec- tronic surveillance to law enforcement officers.' "We should never forget the price we must pay if the enemies of society are permitted to operate without fear of detection. The Commission appointed to investigate the facts relating to Pearl Harbor, of which Mr. Justice Roberts was chairman, noted in its S 3691 report, filed in January 1942, that the re- strictions then in effect prevented resort to 'certain methods of obtaining the content of messages transmitted by telephone or radio-telegraph over the commercial lines operating between Oahu and Japan' and that the contents of the messages sent just prior to Dec. 7, 1941, might have furnished valuable information. "It concluded that among the causes which contributed to the success of the Japanese attack were 'restrictions which prevented effective counter-espionage.' "Today there are too many enemies within the country in the ranks of organized crime who can operate almost at will because we have denied to law enforcement the neces- sary means of detection. "The Congress should legalize the use of evidence secured by electronic surveillance, under such safeguards as [this bill] pro- poses, as a necessary measure in the war against orga ed crim ." NOTICE OF HEARINGS ON AID TO LATIN AMERICA Mr. FULBRIGHT. Mr. President, as chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations, I announce today that the committee has scheduled a public hear- ing to receive testimony from Secretary Rusk on Senate Joint Resolution 53, which relates to President Johnson's message recommending that Congress approve a commitment to increase our aid to Latin America by up to $1.5 bil- lion over the next 5 years. The hearing will be held at 10 a.m. on Friday, March 17, in room 4221, in the New Senate Of- fice Building. In addition, Chairman POLBRICHT an- nounced that on Tuesday, March 21, the committee will hear several executive branch and public witnesses on S. 1030, a bill dealing with the U.S. informational media guaranty program. This hearing will also be held in room 4221, in the New Senate Office Building, beginning at 10 a.m. ADDRESSES, EDITORIALS, ARTI- CLES, ETC., PRINTED IN THE APPENDIX On request, and by unanimous con- sent, addresses, editorials, articles, etc., were ordered to be printed in the Ap- pendix, as follows: By Mr. METCALF: Letter containing impressions of Job Corps program, written by Robert A. Bailey to Donn Peden, editor, and published in the Meagher County News, White Sulphur Springs, Mont., on October 6, 1966. AIR POLLUTION IN WASHINGTON AND THE HOPFENMAIER ODORS Mr. SYMINGTON. Mr. President, those who over the years have opposed home rule for the District of Columbia apparently do so with the premise that the present setup is better for the people of this city. Maybe so. The other day the press carried a story that Washington currently has the dubi- ous honor of running fourth in polluted air among all American cities. Those of us who live in or around Georgetown have firsthand knowledge of this disgraceful condition in our Nation's Approved For Release 2004/05/05 CIA-RDP69B00369R000200020084-0 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69600369R0002 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD ? SENATE Coital, because for many years, without si, Ccess, we have tried to have something ane about the almost unbelievable st lens which come from the Hopfenmaier Rsndering Co., at 3300 It Street NW., any Ow or night the wind blows the odor over Q ctorgetotvn. 1 The Hopfenmaier people cook old hi mes, bone scraps, grease, anything to Otain the desired residual and a profit; tOrthe point where the smell is so unbear- a3le that some people have left the neighborhood and others have been "ren- dered" ill, 1 The smell is so bad that the plant next th the Hopfenmaier plant has a sign on ii ; "The objectionable odors you may rlotice in this area do not originate in this lant." ; We have protested this condition for 31ears. All we get are words, never any a etion. 1 As example, in 1964 we received a tlemorandum from District of Columbia / 4reetor of Public Health, Murray Grant, 111tten to the District Commissioners, vihich says in part: The Hopfenmaier Rendering plant has 1 een a source of objectionable odors in its titesent Georgetown location for eighty years, 0 id has engendered mounting community (Dmplaints during the past twenty years. ?4 The memorandum also states: 1' , The Department of Public Health is evalu- liting the present contribution by the plant 14 objectionable odors in the Georgetown 1 ea in the light of recent improvements. 1 sing the evaluation as a guide, the plant will Lc ?> required to take all further steps that are hnically and economically feasible to min- i ze odors from its processing. - This statement meant exactly nothing, *cause last week this air pollution, as ressed by this disgusting odor, was orse than ever. tinder the normal local self-govern- lent of any city, how long do the Mem- oers of the Senate believe this condition Would be allowed to continue? 1 I shall have more to say about this un- warranted condition. In the meantime, II ask unanimous consent that the memo- randum in question, dated July 21, 1964, . Written by Dr. Murray Grant, Director , of Public Health, be inserted at this point kn the RECORD. , There being no objection, the letter was ,Ordered to be printed in the RECORD, as follows: GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DEPARTMENT OF PUB- LIC HEALTH, Washington D.C., July 21, 1964. 'Memorandum to: The Commissioners, Dis- trict of Columbia. ; Through: Commissioner John B. Duncan. 1 prom: Murray Grant, MD., D.P.H., Direc- tor of Public Health. ubject: Hopfenmaier Rendering Com- pany, 3300 K Street NW. time drawing off tallow, used in the soap week back in industry, and solid residual matter, used as itwasra ipos a high protein additive to animal feeds, area to keep As is well known the rendering of fats tO &MS. g0 i produces strong objectionable odors particu- larly when the material being processed is ' putrid. Throughout the country much ef- Mr. BYR 'fort has been made during the past few memorandu years to reduce the odors from sun it read on the processes. These efforts hate met with vary- feasible steps ing degrees of success, never, however, to rate the con the complete satisfaction of neighbors downwind from such plants during adverse atmospheric conditions. The Hopfenmaier Rendering plant has been a source of objectionable Odors in its pres- ent Georgetown location for eighty years and has engendered mounting community complaints during the past twenty years. Twelve months ago the company agreed to make substantial changes to its plant facili- ties providing for the mechanization of han- dling facilities for both raw materials (fat, bone and grease) as well at finished product (tallow and solid residual matter). It also agreed to make improvements, if found nec- essary, to existing odor removal equipment for cooking vapors consisting of water cooled condensers to remove condensible odors and a combustion process fen' the removal of non- oondensible odors. To date the plant has expended $125,000 on a $150,000 program to provide enclosed conveyors, holding tanks, drum washing fa- cilities and other associated improvements all directed toward a more efficient handling of materials leading to a reduction of in- plant odors and at the same time reducing cooking odors which are aggravated when the raw material is allowed to age and putrefy. At the present time, the Department of Public Health is evaluating the present con- tribution by the plant of objectionable odors in the Georegtown area in the light of recent improvements. Using the evaluation as a guide, the plant will be required to take all further steps that are technically and eCo- nomically feasible to minimize odors from its processing. Mr. BYRD of West Virginia. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the distinguished Senator from Missouri be granted 3 additional minutes. The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tein- pore. Without objection, it is so or- dered. Mr. BYRD of West Virginia. Mr. President, will the Senator yield? Mr. SYMINGTON. I am happy to yield to the distinguished Senator from West Virginia. Mr. BYRD of West 'Virginia. Will the Senator from Missouri state to the Sen. ate whether or not he has upon any previous occasion protested to the presi- dent of the Board of Qommissioners? Mr. SYMINGTON. I have so Pre- tested. And may I say to the able Senator from West Virginia that the memorandum which I just placed in the RECORD was sent to me by Mr. Tob- riper, the Chairman of the Washing- ton, D.C., Board of Commissioners. Mr. BYRD of West Vh-ginia. Wha,t 1 The subject company processes fat and is the date of the memorandum? bone scraps from supermarkets in the metro- politan Washington area extending out over Mr. SYMINGTON. The date of the a radius of 50 to '75 miles. It also processes memorandum is July 21, 1964. grease from restaurants in the same area. Mr. BYRD of West Virginia. This The company operates six days per week memorandum was dated over 21,/2 year; around the clock from 0:00 a.m. Monday ago. , Morning until 11:00 p.m. Saturday evening Mr. SYMINGTON. The Senator it arid estimates that it handles approximately correct. , iz000 pounds of product per day. On oc- basion it operates on Sunday as necessitated The reason why the head of the : by production demands. Washington, D.C., Commissioners Sem ; The process consists of cooking fat, bone the memorandum to me was that on The Judickry iilibcOn , teraps and grease and at the appropriate some unfortunate days and nights of the McClellan, card rho Approved For Release 2004/05/05: piA-RDp69509369R0002 oo f 0020064-0 Manh 14, 1967 964?in *Al, as I recall? ible for the citizens of this the r whitlows open. They oors and close their win- of West Virginia. The s Ates, a$ I recall hearing Senate or today, that all wolOd be-taken to amellb- Igi my understand- ing correct? Mr. SYM G17014. The Senator is correct. Mr. mr. BYR a West. Virginia. What steps, if any hate bee 2 tam, so far?a-s the Senator Mr. SYM steps. No been taken, were as bad Mr. B President, I Missouri th matter. Th spoken to m is my intent District of for the fisc Friday. Th on Friday tion to ask t matter, to been taken taken, to i and will be I thank t matter to t Mr. S ate the pos leader in t the Subco Columbia o Priations h fluence an this proble citizer s tha the comme of the Sen Mr. BYR the Senator CR Mr. TA very perce today in th "Crime an editorial to Mr. Pres sent that t this point There be was ordere as follows: [From the Citizens can thank for taking t Court decisi ment, an is touted ant -crime cruade has pointedly NO c)___ r j?,,__ . dors is ffec ire -17PeL -Ps crirldQt:hanV0e e: , cs ca 01 :t 1 ilywir livejt . z _f . tW,4e:e4., ,e,E,,tiet,niilisgesi:::eroni.h has _ lige ex+1,:t6r ,fr-oInIt on the ' I: c131:1Ioe , i it.' a mrb th; i 9:1:r wo,:ho -nei: fshi g ,ai this i about ul I So to i rr 1 g orn tig,,,ro ifiti.,atS appearWistel_ptshave on ip-orrei f'",I about it. bill ? te jeuctiii nert rei eo tits : ti c illkno t4. ii x, ,cdr tv.,e_mtethheiiesi arid 4 if-ul te N(-40N. ..,,,,d ......e 0 ken, . 'hat stelps ca e $ritttCli E'er bringing- e Opnr-i ,s.0 w Is my-ffiteti_ - etelpiy :pripartee-.ci_ 12s have _ n is r6atter: As - n,.,z ZliAlciity - mit me_ 04 th chairman of ' eollIcl have- e 'Dr' APPro- saY! 171e 8r-411nia.- Mr , Seliator :rome;// this th 0-001-on-itt: 1:404ct of much ltL, - r _ co u rylrig to correct for ? literally- bind..r.OS Of our hthe n140(ernilainto zater:111T r on thefloor? te tis r ts o of West- Vi ? ' rglnla. I thank UsTD 1D2OL007 AZGE. JAR. President, a tive! ---1.4&fia1is- miblialied VcralIttilef-JOhiriarefititTed corrunend-the the litten1lori-of-Se114--6kg, den 1-Q4i ThrialtitiChia Nin- e editOria( may be printed at th ink-Mag. ? - ng Tit) Obl?ction, the editorial to x priaed in the RECORD, _ all street ,leurnal. Mar. 14, 19671 - RIM ANO:JDEOLOGY orritcl abitut _morinting_ crime Senate JUliclary subcommittee - stirriDny liowreoadt supreme HA have hint-pared law enforce- us ihich the Administration's avoided. The prac several co nous. The leeway eve go free. analysis of reflect wo about its icEd effect t of these decisions, entatorslEa- ae -6164f; -a-Ya criminal So much a sitif-=0"6itehir"4.-Efer?ean.'" yonclllhatl We're ohtiVirieed.; an the -' the decisionsd 004?deal HIS thlare tee tinicter -Senator" lphia D6tr1cT-At;?_-