GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, FISCAL YEAR 1965

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP68B00969R000100090013-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 9, 2004
Sequence Number: 
13
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 3, 1966
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP68B00969R000100090013-7.pdf105.42 KB
Body: 
Approved,For Relea; 2004/06/23: CIA-RDP681300969R0024M. S Si?~ - SECRETI 1201-6 l/G , ~~-~`l 3 OCT 1966 MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Planning, Programming and Budgeting THROUGH : Special Planning Assistant to the DD/S!' . SUBJECT : General Accounting Office Findings and Recommenda- tions, Fiscal Year 1965 REFERENCES : (a) Memo dtd 19 Jul 66 to D/L fr DSPA-DD/S, subject: Compilation of GAO Findings and Recommenda- tions for Improving Government Operations (b) Report of Compilation of GAO Findings and Recom- mendations, Fiscal Year 1965 1. We have reviewed with interest the General Accounting Office's (GAO) findings, and associated recommendations, of deficiencies in Government-wide operations during Fiscal Year 1965. 2. In its procurement activity, this Agency normally follows the pro- cedures laid down in the Armed Services Procurement Regulation. There are, however, two important criticisms made by GAO which also could have been made against this Agency. These are: a. Paragraph 4 of reference (b) addressed itself to General Services Administration (GSA) procurement of items on a "brand-name or equal" basis. The GAO noted that 0 could have been saved had GSA pro- cured similar items against more detailed purchase descriptions. We also acquire property on a "brand-name or equal" basis, a practice often made necessary by customer nonacceptance of substitute, but equal, items coupled with a lack of specifications. b. In paragraph 10, the Federal Aviation Agency was criticized for having provided deficient specifications to a contractor; for subsequently SECRE? I CfrP 1 UL 0 460Y -a Ercladed from anlo7atic downirading and 25X1 ? decla~~lllcation Approved For Release 2004/06/23 : CIA-RD 100090013-7 Approved For Rele 2004/06/23: CIA-RDP68B00969ROOi0090013-7 SECRET. SUBJECT: General Accounting Office Findings and Recommendations, Fiscal Year 1965 relaxing these specifications even though they were deficient in the first place; and for failing to make operational evaluations of the resulting preproduction models of the item in question. We are aware of similar cases involving Agency contracts. 3. In our opinion, the two weaknesses discussed above cannot be attri- buted to the Agency procurement process. More germane, in our estimation, is the requirement for an internal Agency mechanism responsible and authorized to: a. Develop all procurement specifications. b. Make final determination as to acceptability of materiel and ser- vices required by CIA. 25X1 25X1. 25X1: Att Ref (b) cc: SPA-DD/S Approved For Release 2004/06/23 : IMAYR[ P68B00969R000100090013-7 U,,a ^ NCLASSM1 O ved F4 e(4 b1O4/06/23: CIA-RDP6aE3 O9QGft4DbAbO13-7 SECRET ^x ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET SUBJECT: (Optional) General Accounting Office Findings and Recommendations, Fiscal Year 1965 FROM: EXTENSION NO. Director of Logistics DATE 3 October 1966 TO: (Officer designation, room number, and buildin ) DATE OFFICER'S COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom g RECEIVED FORWARDED INITIALS to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.) 2 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Approved For Releas 2004/0 /23 : CI -RDP68 00969R000100090013-7 FORM USE PREVIOUS INTERNAL 3-62 610 EDITIONS ^ SECRET ^ CONFIDENTIAL F-1 USE ONLY ^ UNCLASSIFIED 1